TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

griggori Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by griggori on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I don’t rethink it’s the other way around, actually. I think marriage is both a cause and an effect of higher social economic success. Yes, wealthier people get married more often and encourage their children to, but so to do people who are not already wealthy benefit from the stability of a marriage and with that support rise socioeconomically. Most men who are homeless for any length of time are severely mentally ill, drug addicts, or both. Find me the demographic of non mentally ill, non drug…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:00 PM
5

Innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:38 AM
0

I don’t agree with you on really anything you’ve said so far. Marriage is a predictor of lifelong income and socioeconomic status, and this is related to correlation and causation. Yes, people who are better off encourage their kids to get married, but that’s because they know the stability a marriage (traditionally) provided would benefit their life. I’m not disputing that poverty is a driver in criminality. It obviously is a major driver. But it isn’t the only driver. I do believe that access …
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:24 AM
0

It was. Now it isn’t. There still exist cultural vestiges of the patriarchy, but they’re hollow echoes. We’ve changed so radically in the last 60 years in the West that there is really no point using that description at all, anymore. Whatever we are, we are not a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:39 PM
1

I absolutely agree. It wasn’t meant to be taken as any sort of comprehensive analysis. It isn’t attempting to contexualize every variation of masculinity, least of all world-shaking genius like Tesla or Newton (though they fit into my “men create civilization idea, and you can find both Newton and Tesla discussing their motivations - they were highly pro-social.) It was specifically meant to address the OP.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:02 AM
-3

I think it’s broadly true. There will be exceptions, but they wont refute the rule. In the presence of poverty and the absence of an opportunity to make an honorable living, some men will not steal or commit crime. In the absence of an opportunity to start a family, some young men will be huge assets to their community, and be very pro-social. Most won’t be. It is the opportunity to join civilization, community, family and culture that the most aggressive impulses of men are tempered and directe…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 01:02 AM
1

The best counterexample are poor immigrant communities where men achieve a high rate of marriage experience a mere fraction of the crime that other poor communities with low marriage rates do. Most men would like to be married, be honored for their hard work by their community, and have children. These are the pro-social ends to which women (and culture more broadly) have civilized men. In the absence of these opportunity for respect and family, poverty notwithstanding - crime is sure to follow.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:15 PM
0

Would you care to elaborate on what you think is wrong, or are you content just to insult me?
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:06 PM
4

I don’t think this is nearly that simple. I think it violence and criminality in young men is derived from their inability to advance from pro-social behaviors. If behaving well, being polite, working hard, caring for your family and community, courting a women who will honor you, starting a family, and caring for your community as an adult and a father is all foreclosed to you, then you might well turn to less pro-social behaviors to attempt to get ahead. This is the driver for crime, imho. Ind…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:05 PM
2

This isn’t a very long post, I don’t think “wall of text” is really a fair characterization. If someone can’t make it to the last paragraph, that’s on them.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:43 PM
9

I am in this sub because I agree with the vast majority of the content, and I really feel what a lot of you men have been thru. However, unattached young men are the largest demographic driver of crime, and this is exacerbated by poverty, and by cultural dissimilarities. It isn’t misandry to recognize this fact. Men who are a part of a family unit are far less likely to become criminals in their host countries. This is why solo young men are being discriminated against. I hold to the view that w…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:32 PM
23

You deserve an award for this comment. Women believe they can be this selective. They can’t afford to. So many are being led off a cliff of loneliness and unfulfilled lives.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 01:57 PM
2

Nice white pill, OP
/r/MensRights27/08/23 09:24 PM
18

“Men should show their feelings.” “No not like that!”
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:07 PM
2

All of a sudden?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 04:56 PM
8

Not organically. Like the west broadly, the mainstream and common sense views that most people hold are suppressed, censored, and edited by liberal admins on Wikipedia. (And Reddit, and Facebook, and Twitter until Musk). Yes, this is happening all across the west in many institutions. But this isn’t “society’s way of thinking.” It’s a small leftist elite who have grabbed a lot of tech power.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 01:56 PM
21

In case you needed another reason to distrust Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:17 AM
6

Lol. Do please look up the word “majority.”
/r/MensRights05/07/23 11:36 PM
11

Imagine how paralyzingly bad for your mental health it would be to believe that. Can you control your own insecurities? No, some board room for of men does. Internalized victimhood is a hell of a drug.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 04:08 PM
5

“Women are dressing modestly so as to avoid the male gaze.” How they gonna act like this is an innovation. 🤣
/r/MensRights24/05/23 01:30 PM
2

I thought it was a subtle EUIV reference. I’ll go touch some grass now. 🤣
/r/MensRights07/05/23 04:52 PM
8

American here. I think the draft (I.e. conscription) is immoral and should be illegal. For both sexes. If the country faces some existential military crisis, just call for volunteers to enlist and make the standards appropriate to the needs. If the country can’t survive voluntarily, it doesn’t deserve to.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 08:36 PM
12

Exactly. Take this a a huge time saver. Be thankful they eliminated themselves from consideration immediately instead of multiple dates (or years!) down the line.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 11:28 PM
6

If you have 1, you can get some casual stuff.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 11:27 PM
1

Yes, the changes in the modern dynamics between the sexes has made this worse and more complicated, but that doesn’t mean it’s not going to still happen and also it doesn’t mean that it is necessarily going to end badly on average.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 07:47 PM
4

People meet, find chemistry, and fall in love where they are together. That’s in every field of life, work, school, church, wherever. The idea that work, the place we spend nearly 1/3 of our time and can get to know each other prettt darn well, is somehow especially bad place, is horseshit.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 06:23 PM
11

Literally several generations have met at work, married, etc. the fact that work is not a no-go zone for basically all things human that aren’t increased productivity sort of slaps of a toxic and dehumanizing capitalism.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 04:40 PM
1

Thankfully that level of crazy isn’t common.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 02:34 PM
76

Men know that individual women might care. They know individual men might care. They know society, as a whole, doesn’t care.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:15 AM
1

Assumption then insults. Why would anyone want to talk to someone like you?
/r/MensRights16/02/23 05:16 PM
1

I don’t have any interest in discussion with the sort of people who look at someone’s group and posts, only to then make baseless assumptions about that person. Your assumptions are wrong, btw. Also, that’s no basis for having a good faith dialogue.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 02:29 PM
0

The biology is solving a problem about reproduction and having stability to raise young. How are women supposed to “rise above” it, exactly? What’s your concrete proposition?
/r/MensRights16/02/23 02:07 PM
5

Evolutionarily it isn’t shallow at all. We’ve not gotten a hardware update to our culture’s ongoing software, and women are evolved to look for a stable provider, in order to rear children, and money and social standing (power) are absolutely proxies for that.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 06:17 PM
10

Those women are sick, ideologically possessed, and miserable.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:35 AM
1

It’s an invasion of privacy to film people at the gym. It’s not public, you’re paying to be there, you have a right not to be filmed while you exercise. Men across the country should demand their gyms forbid filming in the common exercise areas, or they’re quitting their memberships and stopping all future payments left in their contracts for invasion of privacy.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 11:20 PM
16

There’s no point reasoning with someone as wrong as you are.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:11 PM
21

What utter horseshit.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:25 PM
3

Male supremacy, so, like, Islam?
/r/MensRights27/01/23 03:31 PM
6

Yea, we only eat cooked babies, jeez.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 02:46 PM
1

They don’t. It’s a trend on average, but other women absolutely do fall in love with and marry men who are, by some metric, beneath their social status. Hypergamy is a trend on average, it’s not a constant like the lose of gravity.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 12:00 AM
2

I basically did that. I’m a stay at home dad that does a little farming on the side. My wife makes x10 my farm revenue. We’re rare but we exist. My example should not be taken as some sort of repudiation of the privilege that is much more common for females.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 04:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter