TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

grocket Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by grocket on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/21 02:27 AM
3

.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 06:11 PM
2

.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:57 PM
1

.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:23 PM
2

.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 04:49 PM
1

.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 03:33 PM
3

.
/r/MGTOW14/09/18 02:56 PM
0

Parent is probably referring to the fact that the woman will always contribute an X chromosome and the man's contribution will determine if the child is male or female. That said, it's not accurate to say "men determine the gender".
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 11:43 AM
3

She's cute when she's angry.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 04:29 PM
1

.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/17 01:56 PM
12

.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:05 AM
19

Damn that's funky!
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:50 PM
6

Adventure Time has done a really great job with it's gender bending. It's in-universe cheesy fan-fiction!
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:27 PM
1

don't rape students Was that wrong?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 06:48 PM
1

Good thing we can all count on the masses of feminists to flip their collective shit over this travesty of justice and start protesting. Right?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 01:12 AM
4

no one infantilizes women more than feminists. I call it Neo-Victorian Feminism.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:03 PM
1

I can't recall where I read this, but my recollection is that men do tend more to physical abuse and women to emotional abuse. Men and women do tend to abuse at about the same rate, though.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 09:06 PM
7

We buy half a cow from time to time and this last time it was amazingly lean. We have to add fat back in to make decent burgers.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 09:01 PM
1

"You have a degree in bologna"
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:11 PM
1

what thmsbsh is saying, sorta, is that even people who are have very little melanin can be not "white" and people who have a lot of melanin can in some cases be "white". Given this understanding of "white", though, it's completely impossible to determine if all the people attending the event are "white" or not. You need to do an intense survey of their background, several generations back, and also their current economic status, assess their privilege, examine their genitals, etc. Only then can …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:10 PM
3

Does anyone know if she has borderline personality disorder? Because the "doubling down" on a lie and aggressive attention seeking behavior strongly indicates BPD.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 01:34 AM
3

Video I mentioned this as an example of the vocal minority with internet following bleeding over into the real world. She got massive exposure when that aired. Plenty of people watched it and took the narrative at face value, will never look into it any further, and she gets a bump in status. Likewise with the Colbert spot she got.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:13 PM
-2

As vague as those platforms are, they act, however roughly, as a measuring post. (Also, I would not agree that the platforms are effectively meaningless, but that's for another thread.) You can say how far someone deviates from the center of the party. You can say they lean right or left from the center of the party. The Republican platform is anti-abortion, but a person can still be a Republican if they're pro-choice. It's not necesarily a matter of challenging someone's party affiliation, it's…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:30 PM
2

I certainly agree that the vocal minority can be perceived as the "head" of feminism. I think that's actually a growing concern. Those vocal extremists are able to amplify their voice over the internet which can then bleed over into the "real world" - see Sarkeesian on ABC. But the original point was that it's reductionist to lay a "simple goal" on top of feminism. I think that the conversation that's spawned from that almost makes the point.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:10 PM
1

Individual democrats and republicans do vary greatly. But each of those groups also have a central organization that effectively defines the party's platform. Individual members of the party can and do disagree with specific elements of the platform, though they might still identify with the party. Feminism doesn't have a central organizing agency. Each feminist is completely free to create a "feminism" that suites her/his self, with no one to "officially" denounce it. And conversely, every femi…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:43 PM
3

That is absurdly reductionist. Feminism is far too varied - almost to the individual - to lay a "simple goal" on top of it. Clearly there are current, extremely vocal voices that want to infantalize women, towards some bizarre notion of equality. But you cannot say 1st or 2nd wave feminism had a goal to remove accountability from women. And 3rd wave wasn't politically active enough to really have a goal. I'm saying this merely to hold men to the same level of scrutiny I try to hold women.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:24 PM
23

Has anyone attempted this with men rights or other "anti" feminist writing. I mean, just to make sure it doesn't cut both ways.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 01:05 AM
8

"... take away reason and accountability."
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:53 PM
2

I don't doubt that Playboy has their models sign consent forms, but that's not really relevant to the situation under discussion. Lawyers go out of their way to make extra double sure that any claims against them will fail. I'm not saying what should or should not be illegal. I'm just saying that to the best of my lay knowledge, if the boyfriend takes the pictures, then he owns the copyright. Period. So far as I know, CA's "revenge porn" law doesn't take away copyright. So if an ex-boyfriend pub…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:51 PM
11

Absent any agreements to the contrary, copyright goes to the person who took the picture, not any person in the picture. IANAL. So if girlfriend takes the pictures and sends them to boyfriend, then yes, she hold copyright and is implicitly granting him limited license for use not distribution. If however boyfriend takes pictures with consent, then he holds the copyright and can do what he wants. But see discussion elsewhere in these comments regarding posting nudes as slander. Again, IANAL.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:15 PM
2

I can't fathom how this is a civil liberties issue and therefore, why the ACLU would take a stand on it. They avoid second amendment issues because the don't consider second amendment rights to be "civil liberties." Seems like this should follow the same reasoning.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:14 PM
11

That is a serious problem in public rhetoric these days - "the other side does it, so it's fine if I do too." Does this kid want to be as low as a politician? Or does he aspire to be something better? If he just wants to be another in a long list of shitty politicians, then not only is he entitled to do the same, he is probably best to do the same. If he wants to be better, he has to do better.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter