TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

groucho_barks Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by groucho_barks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

For one thing, "wifey" is adding a y to the word "wife" to make it "cute" or "little". "Hubby" is just a shortening of the longer word "husband".
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:54 AM
1

You can fight for men's rights to disown a child. More power to you. But why does that fight need to involve taking rights away from women? The two are related yes, but for you to say that women don't deserve something just because men don't have it is ludicrous and childish. We should be trying to raise everyone up to the same level of reproductice freedom, not bring everyone down to your level.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:23 PM
1

Well, when someone invents an artificial womb and men can take all responsibility for the baby and the woman doesn't have to experience pregnancy, then we can talk about giving fetuses rights. Until then, as I said, you can not force any person to do anything with their body that they do not want to do.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:24 AM
3

I should have said 'person' rather than 'human'. A fetus is human yes, it is not a person and does not have legal rights. You would be breaking the law if you did not provide medical care for your child, yes. But even between parents and children, you can't force a parent to donate bone marrow or blood or a kidney to save the life of their child.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:28 PM
1

You can fight against circumcision, against the draft, for rights to disown babies, etc. Do you want to punish women and bring more unwanted babies into the world just to make it fair? To bring everyone down to your level instead of trying to rise EVERYONE up?
/r/MensRights22/01/17 01:36 PM
1

Nope. Not gonna go down that road. A fetus is not a human. Even the evangelical christians of the mid 20th century agreed that the baby doesn't have a soul until birth. Even if we consider a fetus a human - which we don't - you still cannot force a person to undergo any medical condition for another person. You cannot force someone to donate bodily tissue even if another (already born) person will definitely die without it.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 01:33 PM
3

He means the fetuses. He's a moron.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 01:30 PM
9

Women's mothers can also have them killed, that's a ridiculous thing to say. Go on and fight for your right to disown a baby or to end infant circumcision. I disagree with the draft all together, no gender should be subjected to that. What extra privileges is it that you think the women marching today want? As far as I know they are afraid of the repeal of Roe V Wade, the war on Planned Parenthood (on organization that also helps men), and the acceptance of misogyny and sexual assault. Women are…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:16 AM
22

I agree that it is wrong to force a man to pay for a child they didn't want. You should be able to disown a child at any age. But, if you take abortion rights away from women it means that even if both people in the relationship don't want the baby the woman would have to carry it to term and put it up for adoption. The man gets away none the worse for wear, and the woman is forced to endure one of the worst experiences a human can go through, physically. You can not force anyone to maintain a d…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:10 AM
17

Because more unwanted babies born into poverty is great for society.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:55 AM

[You mean like this?] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disownment)
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter