TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gt_peter Archive

View 4 posts and 24 comments by gt_peter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

So I always thought this was crazy internet conspiracy stuff. WTF!
/r/MensRights24/04/15 09:03 PM
1

Another area for improvement would be breaking down the numbers on types of FGM and MGM. The counter argument usually given when MGM-FGM prevalence numbers are compared is that they are totally different where only extreme FGM is considered. Breaking down by type and compare types (minimal to minimal vs . Extreme to extreme). Many of the cultures that practice more extreme FGM also practice extreme MGM. It would go a long way in breaking down this method of minimizing common MGM (circumcision).
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:41 PM
1

This is in no way surprising or some big conspiracy. STEM field companies are under great pressure to improve the gender ratio. My company is quite clear -> all things being equal pick a diversity candidate. This is not strictly enforced, but the message is clear. In the case if NCG (new college grad) hiring most of the applicants are pretty close so the women will be hired first. They are not less competent or ready than their male counterparts, but their gender does act as a tie breaker and wi…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:43 AM
1

Lego city series (noted in the article) does have almost no female mini-figs in it. My kid has most of the fire truck ones. Of 20-some mini-figs, there is one female firefighter and a woman who's cat is stuck in a tree. The criticism there is somewhat legit. That said, if Lego wants to make "girlie" Lego sets then more power to them. I think it's more inclusive to have products targeting a range of play styles.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 01:58 AM
2

This just seems like a troll...
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:38 PM
7

Yeah, I don't have a problem with this. Women should be able to dress in normal clothing (shorts!) without being harrassed. Directing it specifically at men isn't great (women judge also), but given the context of the situation perhaps those doing the shaming were all men.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:42 PM
-5

I have mixed feeling on this one. If we take as given that prostitution is illegal, prosecuting the demand seems a better way to go. Street prostitutes are probably in a bad situation and not really there by choice. Busting them into the prison system isn't helping anyone. Johns on the other hand are taking advantage of people down on their luck. It IS exploitative. Many street prostitutes are young men also!
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:02 PM
1

I came to say the same thing. They more than don't add up. They are a total failure.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:45 PM
1

Here is why it's a problem: other people who it DID make uncomfortable overheard it. Like it or not that is still sexual harassment in the workplace. You can't tell naughty jokes in the workplace even if your intended audience is okay, your unintended audience might not be.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:55 PM
5

Ugh, I read the blog, I read the Ada initiative response, and I read the conference talks list. I think they were right to pull the talk. Every other single talk is technical. The pulled talk is totally off topic for the main conference. I work in tech in the Bay Area. This is a professional industry conference and this type of talk just shouldn't be in the main talk. There were off site events more related to hacker culture (lock picking). At most her talk could be there, but its still iffy eve…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:09 PM
2

The comments section is the interesting part of this article. The usual double standard..."he's lazy", "deadbeat" - but also some push back. It looks like maybe Sslate is trying to balance out some of their recent anti-male articles a bit.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:11 PM
14

I get frustrated with gendered disparities (circumcision), but this is a bit different. Based on what women see in media you'd think that breast cancer was the big one and it isn't. People know its the number 1 for men, but they don't know about it for women. Also, women have different heart attack symptoms than men, which is not publicized. I just can't bring myself to take issue with a campaign targeted specifically at a group where there is ignorance. This is done routinely in public health. …
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:35 PM
6

Read the article...carefully. The only thing the murder victim is accused of is looking at pornography and being possesive (t-shirt with her name) that was arguably created AFTER his death. All of the abuse was done by her parents and by her PRIOR boyfriend. Gvien the lack of substantiation (and frankly even if there was some degree of abuse) it doesn't justify stabbing someone 27 times and then shooting them. Also, lying about it to police and trying to cover it up is not behavior of someone in…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:28 PM
8

You're absolutely right. What is more interesting is that the defense thinks this will work. Now that IS indicative of sexism. This is equivalent to blaming the victim that you sometimes see in rape cases.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:16 PM
3

Mandated reporting is nothing new. My partner is a high school teacher in CA and they have been mandated reporters for years. I'm a manager at a large corporation and we're effectively mandated reporters on sexual harrasment as we can be sued individually for not taking action. Article author is freaking out over nothing!
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:17 PM
3

I'm not stay at home, but I am equally involved in parenting. So far I have only had good experiences at the park with other parents. That said the shunning of me as a father started in the hospital, has shown up at day care, and the total lack of support for new fathers. Fathers having equal status as parents is one of the most critical steps to solving issues around custody and men being viewed with suspicion around children.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:43 PM
1

Thanks for catching that. I fixed the post. Here is another copy of the link: http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201204180900
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:27 PM
1

So I take your point that she does well financially, but in New York that 100k doesn't go as far as you think it might. However, cost of living aside the idea that there should be no alimony under any circumstances is a pretty extreme position. How do you set things up for one partner in a relationship to stay home with kids, even for a short period? Most mid to high level execs have stay at home spouses who totally support their career by taking care of everything else. This type of team arrang…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:16 PM
1

So I don't disagree in principal with what you are advocating, but let's be realistic. We all know about bias in the courts against men. If you open any of it to interpretation you open the door to misandry. A strauighb formula wouldn't be perfect for every situation, but if I were getting divorced I'd much rather have a formula than my ex sobbing to the judge about the injustice of it all and what a bad man I am.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:10 PM
0

So are you saying there should be no alimony at all? Let's say one spouse stays home with the kids, or the wife earns more than the husband, or one partner is taking a lower end job in order to support the others career. These are all very common scenarios. I'll state that alimony should be time limited and shouldn't be a life sentence. I'll state that alimony should be adjusted when income changes. Perhaps consider a "true up/adjust" at tax time where if alimony paid exceeds income difference (…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:46 AM
-2

So the revised values don't seem too out of line to me. If his post tax take home is $12750/mo And we assume a 30% total tax burden his annual income is $215k vs. hers at $103k. At $112k/yr difference a "fair" alimony. Divide. The difference by 2 (they split the difference)and then by 12 (monthly) you get $4800. The article reports a revised payment of $5k so the new number is reasonable. They have 3 kids and in their income group $700/kid/mo isn't crazy either depending on age and custody. That…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 01:01 AM
1

I completely agree with you. Read the stories closely. There are photos of the bruise that were taken before the police became involved. Why take photos unless you are documenting? Unless you think the wife is out to get him (unlikely given her public stance) then I'm not willing to shout from the hilltops that this guy is being railroaded by evil feminists. All I said above was that we should watch and wait before we make strong statements.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 10:09 PM
-2

So let me sound out another take on this. From what is in the media it seems like there is actual physical evidence: text messages from the wife discussing the events, photos of the bruises etc. It seems like the wife confided to the neighbor and the neighbor reported it. I dont think the wife wants the prosecution, but it does seem like an argument got physcial and was reported. The police do need to act on this type of thing even over the objections of the spouse. DV case have the victim livin…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:30 PM
58

I'm in management at a high tech company in the Fortune 500. The groups I work with are male dominated and I'll tell you flat out that sort of humor would get shut down fast even if there weren't ladies in the room. You're at work, not a bar. You got a big time pass from this woman. Apologize and completely stop the jokes and count your lucky stars she didn't complain to anyone officially.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 08:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter