TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

guest121 Archive

View 7 posts and 93 comments by guest121 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Multam fain.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:26 PM
2

What about the victim withdrawing the complaint? is that possible? What then?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:50 AM
1

This idiot has no clue whatsoever about life in Romania, politics here, or gender relations. Source: me. 36 years living in Ro and counting.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:00 AM
7

This is abuse. There is a case (I will look up sources but I'm on the phone now) where following an accident in early chilhood a doctor decided that it's best to reconstruct a vagina instead of a penis. The boy was then raised as a girl. It was a nature vs nurture thing. He was always a misfit. When he got older and found out he had srs to become a man again. Then he married a woman. I don't know why but in the end he commited suicide. It is a very sad story. You cannot beat nature.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 05:38 PM
1

You forgot to mention in between the r/ relationships post and the divorce, there will be a r/ deadbedrooms post where he will be encouraged to do more chores. Because she is tired, and that's why she doesn't want sex.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 07:20 AM
1

Our only recourse is to take our business elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 05:15 AM
-1

Reddit is a privately owned company! Nobody but the owners have a saying in who manages it and how it is managed! It's up to the market to reward the good decisions and punish bad ones! Who the fuck are these people that think they can intervene in somebody's company!?!
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 06:51 AM
46

He does deserve credit. And a lot of credit to his boss who really understands and helps him.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 02:40 PM
26

Well, at least she was keeping him safe from STDs ;)
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 01:46 PM
6

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasectomy)
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 01:28 PM
309

You cannot be sexist against men! To be sexist you must be in a position of power and.....huh....I mean....she is not, I mean....
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:56 PM
2

And finally, the source
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/15 03:48 PM
3

My point was that there should be no surprise for the folks here. Maybe for other guys, but not for those in this sub.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 12:48 PM
19

Really? The way I see it the girl is having fun with a good looking dude. That he is wanted by other girls makes it even better. She is during the "fun" times in her life. Settling down is for much later.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 09:20 AM
63

C'mon, who the fuck would you expect her to date? With her SMV? Of course she would go for the top. Because she can.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 09:01 AM
14

Ha ha , young and good looking guy! Doesn't mean that women are shallow, does it?
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 10:28 AM
9

This I cannot comprehend either. If somebody is made aware that a crime was comitted, are they not obligated to report it to the police? There is prison sentece for rape. If one is conviced that a rape occured and the only thisg they did was to expell the perpetrator and not report it to the police, should they be charged with helping the perpetrator?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:04 PM
5

she is not even willing to try to remember the past accurately and face it. Not trying to defend her, but with such a past I'd rather forget also.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:30 AM
4

OK, but how is this legal? Isn't there an obligation to report such incidences to the police?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 10:04 AM
12

Ok, I have one question because I am not american: How come universities investigate sexual assault? When they are made aware of such an event, should they not report it to the proper authorities? I mean, this is punishible with jail time. Should not the police and DA investigate such events?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 06:49 AM
7

So why do feminists demonize male sexuality? Duh, for a power take over, what else.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:06 PM
1

Exactly. And to add to that: there are many degrees who are unlikely to bring you a good job. And those people bitch about the validity of their degree also (art history, literature etc). But in the case of women's studies, oh it's the patriarchy. Shifts the blame from the student who is not ready to do hard work twords other people.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:21 AM
2

I hate to circlejerk but you are right. And that is beacause their rethoric cannot stand the scutiny of logic, so they resort to other tactics instead, name calling being one of their favourite.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:57 PM
25

It goes against men agressors; women victims narrative and Shows shorter senteces for women than men for the same crime.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:12 AM
2

In a few lines you made a more in depth analisys than the entire article.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:06 AM
14

Good. Now, lets see the law requiring companies to “comply or explain” the number of women janitors. And lets see schools “comply or explain” the number of male teachers.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 01:19 PM
6

I might be wrong but I get the feeling that pushing the homofobia thing is just a tactic. If it were a boy he would stand no chance. And since my understanding is that the law makes no distionction, they are trying to get simpathy by painting her as a victim of homofobia.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:58 AM
3

They are now allready complaining that there are not enough good men. What are they going to say when there won't be enough men?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:27 AM
3

Oh they listen. They know. Otherwise how can you explain the efforts to suppres the data?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 11:42 AM
26

You know sometimes, I'm glad I do not live in USA.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:08 PM
9

Easy. Because women are seen as weak creatures. It's just Patriarchy backfiring at men can't you see? The only way to stop this is to support feminism more to dismantle the patriarchy etc etc you know the rest.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:55 PM
17

Oh c'mon. How sick do you have to be to think like this? Uncertainty allows mothers to select for their children the father who would be best for them. Is this for real? You want to select a father for your children? Well, don't fuck other guys then. Is this really that hard? it has removed from women a powerful instrument of choice. It think they misspelled deceit. So you go screwing around, and then you choose a father? Is this how it is supposed to work?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:13 PM
1

Just commenting to find the link later. That first comment is great: short, to the point, touche big issues.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:40 AM
17

A victory for feminism: Women can't think for them selfs. Or was it women are strong and independent and can do whatever they want? Guys, I'm a bit confused here...
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:31 AM
2

There is some effort on reddit to portray MR as a hateful sub. Anyone coming here often knows that is not the case and debate is welcomed here (more or less, I am not saying there is no hive mind, but definitely not hate). That is why I consider this kind of profanity trolling meant to show how hateful we are. *Grammar
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:22 AM
8

The guy has to be a troll.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 06:41 AM
15

Yes, because men have set up this system, the Patriarchy that hurts them, but they keep doing it anyway just to spite women.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 11:13 AM
7

And if you don't like any boobs you are oppresive. So we covered about everything.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:09 PM
8

Sort comment by rating and you will see that there is hope.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 07:39 AM
1

From what I remember there is a legal difference between free speach and hate speach.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:43 PM
59

woah Were you really surprised? Everytime a feminist argues about top execs being mostly male I allways couter with this: "Ok, let's legislate quotas: half of managers must be female and half male, also half of miners, janitors, lumberjacks, truck drivers etc". It usually shuts them up (or they go into that privilege or mansplaining bullshit).
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:33 PM
5

In my opinion is quite simple: women in general are sane people wishing for equality. That is why they are distancing themselfs from the jebel type feminism, they see it's not about equality and they don't want to be associated with it.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:37 PM
10

Me too, fire departments do not take false alarms lightly.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:28 AM
1

This sounds like a press release.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:09 PM
2

Ah yes, western women are the most opressed.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 02:28 PM
1

Same here. But then again this happened in Eastern Europe, so in the west thinghs might be different.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:03 AM
0

Same issue here, with a female literature teacher in highschool. What these people don't realize it that it hurts girls in the long run also: some of them got the impression that they really were that good, and when the tests came they were devastated that they didn't get the grade they were expecting, and that us, boy got bigger grades. Those particular girls were smart actually and are doing well professionally, but the behaviour of that teacher did not help them.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:35 AM
0

Welcome to life.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:26 AM
2

Furthermore, who the fuck gives you the privilege of defining what words mean. English is not my first language, when I want a definition I go to Oxford Dictionary or some other academic source, not something that would fit my agenda.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:11 PM
2

Not all types of outcome. You see them talking about what percentage of women are athletes, senior managers, artists. You never see them commenting what percentage of women are janitors, miners lumberjacks etc. We want all animals to be equal, but some more equal than others.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:01 PM
2

My point isn't that women have legitimate gripes with the system, or that there isn't sexism still around, my point is that most of what you think is "feminism" is really a work, a gimmick, a marketing scheme. It is straight up consumerism, repackaged as a gender issue. And also: "We need more women in power." Wrong preposition, dummy, but anyway you have them. You have judges and prosecutors and twenty female senators, what has it gotten you? Your own ground floor women don't protect each other…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:06 PM
9

That is femism these days: Anybody (women, men, minorities etc) doing poorly in a field -> blame men
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:02 AM
0

ARRA: I assume you mean "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009" - one can disagree with it, but I don't see how it's sexist. VAWA: I assume you mean "Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA)". On this one even the name is sexist. ACA:I assume you mean "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" - again, I don't see how this is sexist.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:42 PM
7

Well, I am not an american man. I follow this sub from time to time. Could you please explain why you state "goodbye to your rights"? What legislation is he supporting in this area? (I'm from Europe and we generaly like Obama here.)
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:21 PM
1

Many are sex slaves. Many are not. The way to control this is to legalize it, not to ban it. Employers would have to provide papers, health checks etc. Everybody would be better protected, the girls and the customers.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 06:14 AM
19

Yeah, ”UN global ban” that is so effective it will fix it immediately. I mean, why don´t we get the UN to issue a ban on genocide, thus stopping it completely.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 11:48 AM
11

Exactly, WTF, these people don't wash?
/r/MensRights01/09/10 08:43 AM
12

I wonder why those feminists insist on women reproductive rights and not stick to the real issues.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:48 PM
1

Neither do I but the choice of words was a bit strange.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:41 PM
6

the child is dead. No big deal. I really don't know what to say to that.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:36 PM
16

Let's try: The social implications of letting mothers opt out sound so awful that I wouldn't want to ever see legislature passed. If you don't want to be a mother, dont fucking have sex. hmm...
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:30 PM
4

From a moral point no. From a legal point we don't know where he lives, but if it's the US he has no choice. Sad indeed.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:11 PM
3

No, it's not what people think. It's the way it is.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:05 PM
4

You are an adult, this is your choice. We are talking about a kid who is still developing. And even so, you transvest if and when you choose. Are you sure you would like to have this imposed on you and the be paraded for the laughs of others?
/r/MensRights09/02/10 02:09 PM
3

He is 11. It's very important to avoid such behaviors when a kid's personality is developing. Everyone since Freud and Adler knows this, teachers should know better. Do teachers in US not take child psychology classes? This is not about PC, is about a developing child.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 07:01 AM
1

I do hope this is not feminism. Following this logic EVERYTHING is filled with Racism, Misogyny, and Disabled Prejudice. I can analyze a recipe for a Bulgarian salad or pizza in this way and find evidence of Racism, Misogyny, and Disabled Prejudice.
/r/MensRights03/02/10 10:02 AM
3

That was my point. This could be submitted to /equality if there is evidence. But like this it looks like propaganda.
/r/MensRights03/02/10 08:44 AM
3

There are down mode squads but I don't think 2X is one of them. It's one of the sanest places around here. A huge difference from /feminism and /ladybashing.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 01:29 PM
3

Fixed. Thank you, I don't know what happened.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 01:25 PM
1

Crazy people are crazy. Always have been, always will be. A bunch of psychos are not the real problem.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 01:32 PM
1

Whoa, somebody agreeing on the internets, gotta love reddit.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 07:24 AM
5

I disagree, playing with guns is just fun is not preparing kids for the army. I read about a mom who refused to buy toy guns for her boys and they ate their sandwiches in shape of pistols and started shooting each other. We should let the kids be kids more and not see some hidden dark agenda behind every toy. From my personal observation: my daughter plays with trucks and dolls alike. If she will want a toy gun I don't see any harm in buying it for her.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 08:58 AM
1

I sure am glad I don't live in that country.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 07:16 AM
13

As someone said you need a lot more if you want to troll this sub.
/r/MensRights20/01/10 09:59 AM
1

Romania
/r/MensRights04/01/10 06:28 AM
1

The actual percentage is to be discussed. But this also benefits the child. You see, in some unlucky circumstances the father might lose his job, but usually the income increases with the years (promotions, raises, etc.) and so the the amount of money increases automatically without the mother having to go to court or things like that.
/r/MensRights24/12/09 10:22 AM
2

In my country child support is a percentage of your income (I think 33%). This stays the same but the amount of money given changes as the income changes. IMO this is the best solution.
/r/MensRights24/12/09 08:10 AM
2

In Romania we have it. Mothers or fathers get 2 years with 80% pay.
/r/MensRights03/12/09 07:42 AM
4

The problem I have here is with the word systematically . Yes bad things happen but does this guy live in a war zone? Does he know what systematically means?
/r/MensRights06/11/09 10:05 AM
2

Yes, but if you kill 90% of men (I believe he is included in the other 10%) then they guy will have much bigger chances of getting laid.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 02:36 PM
3

Well, the statistics presented are obviously way off. But the interesting part is that there are many women who believe them and in my opinion this is the worst thing that these so called feminists do: they scare women by continuously repeating these numbers, and so many women believe them and actually live in fear. This is a great disservice to both men and women.
/r/MensRights09/10/09 07:52 AM
1

I hope you mean this ;)
/r/MensRights02/10/09 02:08 PM
1

Because famous folks high up the socio-economic ladder said it does not make it true. This is a logical fallacy. Argumentum ad verecundiam
/r/MensRights02/10/09 02:04 PM
0

And it's not even a throw-away account.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 08:58 AM
6

The article is one of the best and balanced I have seen in a while, but this comment is the stupidest and most idiotic I have ever seen on this site. EDIT: After idiotic please read also deranged.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 06:39 AM
23

I actually feel sorry for these people, they obviously have issues.
/r/MensRights01/10/09 01:35 PM
2

Link Sorry, I don't know how to link the title.
/r/MensRights01/10/09 10:59 AM
3

True.
/r/MensRights30/09/09 10:27 AM
0

She is just a politician who will say anything that will get votes. Even male politicians will say this if they think they will get more votes from women than they will lose from men.
/r/MensRights30/09/09 08:02 AM
2

While I agree with this point, please find better sources than a tabloid.
/r/MensRights29/09/09 10:30 AM
1

On the other hand, if they charge this woman, then someone similarly situated in the future might decide to stick with her story rather than coming clean. I suggest we no longer punish murder, this will make all the murderers come clean.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 06:59 AM
3

Yes, I think sarcasm can be used to argue a valid point. Also, it is very helpful to screen who you are debating with, if they are too stupid to get the joke, then there is no point in continuing a discussion. And from what I have seen here, everything is up for joking (see pedo bear)
/r/MensRights22/09/09 06:56 AM
2

Yeah, these rapists are getting younger and younger. /s
/r/MensRights21/09/09 11:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter