TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

guntermench43 Archive

View 1 post and 326 comments by guntermench43 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

guntermench43/r/MGTOW22/03/17 03:23 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/
/r/MensRights21/06/19 02:09 AM
2

This. Or go on a Tuesday in a couple weeks when it'll be like $6, I'm ok with that.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:32 PM
1

Her powers and abilities? She's basically Superman with Starfire's starbolts instead of laser eyes and Spidey sense instead of frost breath. Also she can apparently time travel and isn't weak to magic or kryptonite.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:31 PM
3

Huh, so you're the one guy keeping that series occasionally alive...
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:29 PM
3

Disagree, Rogue One was garbage. The characters were terrible and the majority of the movie was boring. The only good part was the Vader scene, and even then they fucked that up by having Leia's ship participating in the battle. There being good female led shows I can agree with, but not that one. Not any of the new Star Wars shit really.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:23 AM
2

Is that NISVS? Add the made to penetrate and rape stats for last 12 months for men and compare to the rape stats for women. That's a neat one as well.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:59 AM
1

I was speaking purely about Carol Danvers, who has been known as both as well as Binary and something else I forget and has remained mostly unchanged with the notable exception of her time as Binary where she was effectively a god. Edit: also she's only been Captain Marvel for like 5/6 years.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 08:45 PM
1

To my knowledge she doesn't have any weaknesses. Her power list, however, is quite extensive: super strength, endurance, durability, resistance to toxins and poisons, is at one point able to tap into a white hole manipulating heat and gravity and the electromagnetic spectrum with the side bonus of light speed travel, can otherwise survive in space and fly 6x the speed of sound, has some precognition, energy blasts and energy absorption.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:24 PM
15

I mean, Ms. Marvel is a Mary Sue character. She's basically Superman without the weaknesses and ice breath.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:47 PM
1

Which would be true is they weren't built to do both. Plus this whole situation is a joke.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:41 AM
1

Yes, even if people are pissed off about the meta. The extent of the PR teams involvement would be "hey, people are pissed" to which the likely reply would be "we know". They're completely different teams that do completely different things and likely have little overlap in skillset.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:38 AM
1

The balance team is entirely unrelated to their PR department.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:34 AM
1

Ok? What does that have to do with two teams protest banning all of the supports?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:28 AM
1

Following the release of this competitive ruling, the LCL community come to the defence of ROX. in the LCL Open Cup earlier today, Der Zentral Magier and Elements Pro Gaming used all 10 bans on support champions. Fucking LOL. That's fantastic.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 12:03 AM
2

I swear I read somewhere that most of the girls were support mains in solo queue, so they literally just did ban out their champion pools.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 12:02 AM
1

When TSM would ban champs so the first letters spelled TSM...
/r/MensRights23/02/19 12:00 AM
4

Depends where you live. Edit for clarity: there are a number of places where it is not illegal for women to be topless.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 01:36 PM
1

Which is mildly ironic seeing as being fatherless increases chances of crime.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:34 PM
3

Well, federal law is one-party consent. And Illinois' wiretapping law was deemed unconstitutional in 2014. It was reintroduced and now, to my understanding (which is limited to about 15 minutes of Googling) prohibits eavesdropping and recording or oral conversations, but not electronic ones. So I guess only ever talk to people on the phone?
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:57 PM
2

Only the sith deal in absolutes.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:28 AM
3

They just add it all and divide to get an average for each gender and call it a day. No, they are not likely including homelessness.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:05 PM
5

If you're responsible for driving drunk, why would you not be responsible for fucking drunk?
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:43 PM
4

Yeah, the point is that if they choose parental surrender they don't get visitation rights or anything else. Why would that mean that it should be opt in? The point is to give men the ability to opt out like women.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:34 AM
1

By the time we see her she's had like 14 years of practice with Violet, and still has some trouble keeping the kids in line over dinner (asking Bob to intervene when Violet and Dash are fighting under the table). She's shown as a good parent, but not perfect. Bob in the movie is shown to be a little in over his head at the start, but he definitely figured out most of it. There's definitely some things not in his wheelhouse but nobody's perfect. Also everyone would have trouble with Jack Jack. Ho…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:42 PM
11

That's not a bug, it's a feature.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:59 PM
4

"have you ever had anything to drink and then had sex?"
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:17 PM
2

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf Definition of rape used: forcible penetration of an orifice Bullshit stat used that wasn't included in the "fact sheet": made to penetrate 1,473,000 women raped in prior 12 months 219,000 men raped in prior 12 months Oh wait...1,715,000 men made to penetrate in prior twelves months, that means up to 1,934,000 men were raped This is often where that came from (though it's 1-in-5) and it used leading questions and practically exc…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:14 PM
1

Suspended I believe.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:22 PM
1

Speak your opinion. If they justify your fear of voicing it, they aren't your friend.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:19 PM
3

When did they ever welcome open discussion?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:54 PM
20

Men were 2.5 times more likely to be sexually assaulted in an institutional setting (school, non-commercial or non-corporate area) than women. Damn.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 04:38 PM
14

The vote was expanded to all men in the UK in 1918, a mere 10 years before women. The only ones that could vote prior were a limited group of land owners, a process that started in 1832. Prior to that there were 360'000 eligible voters in the UK, it was increased in 1832 to 650'000, or 18% of adult men. The right to vote was never taken away, it didn't exist in the first place. For nearly everyone.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:17 AM
3

OK, that thumbnail is fantastic.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:51 PM
144

"The only punishment a guy like that deserves is a bad case of blue balls!" Holy shit that was fantastic.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:18 PM
13

I've taken genders studies courses. They're designed based on data from questions that seem innocent to the one being surveyed and can be twisted by the one doing the survey. This allows them to teach that women are being discriminated against. They then peer review rubber stamp each others work, because there's no one that disagrees with them ideologically in the field, to give it more weight. So because girls are taught that they're being discriminated against, they go through life expecting a…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:06 PM
10

It started as rich white girls that wanted rights without responsibilities and devolved into a modern day victimhood complex that prompts people to use shitty questions to get questionable statistics to "prove" the need for feminism so they don't lose their job which is entirely dependent on the genders being unequal. Edit: Oh, sorry, I forgot about the part where they were literally terrorists for a time as well.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:41 PM
4

Everything
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:36 PM
1

Actually heard on CBC Radio 1 this evening the statement that in the 70s close to 50% of Canadian married couples (I think, I don't remember the exact statistic) met and started dating at work, and now it's dangerous to ask someone out at work.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:30 AM
10

The statistics only say that because there is no effort to differentiate between suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-harm.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 11:20 PM
3

Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:08 AM
1

That time of the week I guess.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 08:58 PM
-3

I sound like a nagging wife? Hahahahaha a nagging wife would be bringing up the same shit for three years every couple of days. Edit: You want to point out hypocrisy go ahead, but it'll be more effective finding new examples.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:27 PM
-6

Then go post it on r/feminism instead of dropping it here every week.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:37 PM
19

Oh hey, this post again.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:12 AM
4

You may want to go see a doctor about that.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:05 PM
1

Pretty sure most colleges and universities, at least in Canada, can let you appeal and have someone else grade the paper.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:21 PM
2

Because they've spun being anti-feminist as being anti-women.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:26 PM
7

As an owner of a Microsoft Phone, Bing isn't as horrifyingly bad as people make it out to be.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:02 PM
3

Stemple’s 2016 study found that a stunning 4.5 million American men have been forced to penetrate another individual at some point in their lives That's lowballing it...
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:20 PM
0

Well, technically it IS a code name and can be either, but it wouldn't be James Bond.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 11:22 PM
2

The great white strong and feminist.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:10 AM
1

That of in fact what they said on the 2X post for this article.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:09 PM
2

Pretty much. There are significant hormone differences between boys and girls. This leads to problems when both boys and girls are expected to act like girls.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 07:03 PM
4

It's more both are socialized to act the same, but it comes naturally to most girls and few boys.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:59 AM
1

Still doubt it. A major stink, yes, but nothing will come of it. They'll just tell whoever makes a fuss to send a woman that can meet their standards and she will pass.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 03:16 AM
13

I doubt they'll pass her. There will obviously be a huge outcry, but I doubt they'll budge.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 03:07 AM
3

They were far ahead of their infantry and the terrain was not particularly good for tanks to begin with. This was also early in the war when Hitler would have still been listening to his generals. No historians actually believe the "Oh he showed mercy".
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:28 PM
2

That's just a theory, and a far fetched one at that. Far more likely the tank lines were over stretched and Göring was able to convince Hitler that the Luftwaffe could finish the job.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 08:38 PM
1

If we hold people accountable for deciding to drive drunk we should hold them accountable for deciding to fuck drunk.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:18 PM
2

I saw it last night and thoroughly enjoyed it.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:15 PM
2

And neither of these are on either canada sub. That's not surprising.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:07 AM
2

The problem is when the language is used, which is immediately. It immediately colors the investigation and trial and presumes guilt. I'm not saying people aren't raped and it isn't a terrible thing, but the presumption should always be innocent until proven guilty and in the minds of enough people for it to matter these terms imply guilt. They are then used to push legislation that either makes sexual assault a guilty until proven innocent crime or like in Canada just gets rid of your ability t…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:49 PM
1

Because feminism.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 09:06 PM
0

Fighting against due process is a problem, but using "survivor" to describe people who have survived sexual assault has absolutely no relation to that I disagree, it implies guilt the guilt of the accused just as much "victim" when used instead.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 07:30 PM
10

Common-law partner This applies to a person who is not your spouse, with whom you are living in a conjugal relationship, and to whom at least one of the following situations applies. He or she: has been living with you in a conjugal relationship, and this current relationship has lasted at least 12 continuous months; Note In this definition, 12 continuous months includes any period you were separated for less than 90 days because of a breakdown in the relationship. is the parent of your child by…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 05:15 PM
21

It exists, afaik, in all of Canada :(
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 05:07 PM
2

or hold onto conversations/evidence in case a girl cries wolf and claims rape. Unless you're Canadian, in which case you have to present those as evidence to your accuser before the trial* and have them be worth almost nothing.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:58 AM
6

There's a difference between sexism and good networking.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:08 PM
28

It actually only covers women, they just aren't allowed call them women's studies.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:04 PM
1

I know.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 04:45 PM
2

Ah. Well then.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 03:47 PM
1

That's the point? IIRC he did it purely to see how hard it was to do in Canada and afaik just never changed it back.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 03:29 PM
0

Well I can't because they've already banned me, and I can't read Portuguese so I can't read the original article. If that's the case that guy's a shitbag.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:31 PM
1

Please someone post this on feminism or 2X. Please. I need the entertainment.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 09:52 PM
3

There are other countries giving 95% to women and girls and the remaining 5% to women and girls, and maybe men and boys?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 01:22 AM
4

Not enough to justify 95% of the spending going to women and girls. It's sexist as fuck.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:16 PM
6

Ottawa unveils new feminism focused foreign aid policy The federal government has unveiled what it is calling “Canada’s first feminist international-assistance policy,” with plans to eventually ensure that at least 95 per cent of the country’s foreign aid helps improve the lives of women and girls. True, we don't yet. But it is the plan to.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:11 PM
21

My disdain is not spending money on them, it's spending all of our money on them.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:46 AM
27

There's nothing wrong with that. There's plenty wrong with basically exclusively doing that, which is what we're apparently doing now. The point is the Liberal Party of Canada is effectively the Feminist Party of Canada and it should not be surprising that they want to get rid of being able to defend yourself against rape accusations. Just listen and believe.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:34 AM
59

This is a country that has feminist foreign aid spending.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 08:51 PM
3

Post this in the CanadaPolitics does Canada have a gender equality problem thread.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 03:16 PM
2

equality I hope you're being sarcastic, if not I pity you.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:59 AM
5

I think in this case they are saying every single as in all women they've met do this, not all single women.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 09:51 AM
1

My bad. Totally missed that and just saw only looking for 50/50.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:35 PM
1

Oh my bad i missed that
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:34 PM
2

That's be a perfectly good reason for you to get your parental rights taken away. In fact that's literally a divorce strategy for women. "I'm scared of him and scared of what he might do to our son" She obviously does not like you. If she has primary custody she may attempt to alienate you to your son, and there's fuck all anyone is going to do about it. And by that point you may not have a leg to stand on because will undoubtedly look like a perfect mother. I'll not saying don't let her get cus…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:06 PM
2

If she's threatening you, she could end up threatening him. Willing to take that risk?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:40 PM
20

Egalitarian is a better term...
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:09 PM
1

God damn I hope this is abused.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:56 PM
3

You say millions of Muslims have been killed in unnecessary wars like they haven't been doing that to each other for hundreds of years.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:06 PM
2

Didn't they get rid of default subs?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:21 PM
1

It's desperation because she seriously needs good publicity. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 09:00 AM
1

No, I'd say no one used it because it's ridiculous to pronounce.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:46 AM
2

Masculinism is also ridiculous to pronounce.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 02:59 AM
1

Loaded with the truth and they have no defense.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:25 AM
1

They're allowed to do the blanket band only because they are a "safe space" and have admins on the mod team.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/17 12:34 PM
1

SJW: Useful idiot.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:07 AM
1

You would have to prove they did it maliciously...
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:09 AM
2

So you are bat shit crazy, ok.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:23 PM
8

A pat on the back and a "better luck next time".
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:56 AM
2

It already is? There are already more women than men. The fuck are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:41 AM
1

Agreed, I was counting sexual violence as violence for the sake of laziness. The whole culture is much more literal over there and it's not a culture that plays nice with itself let alone others. Massive waste of resources to expect that to change in a reasonable time by moving here.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:03 PM
3

Of course it's bullshit all by itself, but it's not like they listen to reason.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 01:37 PM
5

I want to move :(
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:37 AM
5

You're preaching to the choir here, I'd prefer we didn't accept refugees. I'm just saying that the men are higher risk for crime, especially violent crime, than the women.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:04 AM
6

I never said there weren't.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:58 AM
1

Then they say men are more successful if they don't go, therefore only women should go.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:47 AM
7

Wear a camera and specifically do it in sight of a woman taking up multiple seats with her bags. Then say you found her sprawl offensive.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:44 AM
3

He likes being popular, and unfortunately being feminist makes him popular.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:43 AM
4

It makes you higher risk, yes. Even if they aren't a terrorist. It sucks, but it's true.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:42 AM
3

Everything.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 07:27 PM
51

There's no way that's not illegal...
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:56 AM
1

They're listed if you look at the tables, yes. They aren't listed if you just read their reports on the data. If you read the overviews they have men basically don't exist, despite in several cases provably having it worse using their own data. The people that would laugh at a man being raped probably wouldn't even agree that they can be made to penetrate against their will.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:39 PM
3

The problem isn't the severity of the penalty, the problem is that made to penetrate makes it sound less important. Which is the entire reason it's used in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:25 PM
3

Their definition is being penetrated without your consent.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:57 PM
5

Very sexist.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 02:03 AM
25

This was a very questionable study, but I know many feminists that use it like gospel: NISVS Women raped in the 12 months prior: est 1,473,000 Page 18, table 3.1 Men raped in the 12 months prior: est 219,000 Men made to penetrate in the 12 months prior: est 1,715,000 Page 26, table 3.5 So 1,473,000 women were raped and if we use a sensible definition of rape we have 1,934,000 men raped in the 12 month period before the study. It's important to use a sensible definition of rape because the CDC do…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:11 AM
6

Because female only gyms and gym times are legal.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:13 PM
9

Feminists reached were they are right now because of gynocentrism and no one seemingly being able to tell them they're full of shit.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:21 PM
1

I remember how upset he was that people were saying he had the Vimy Ridge memorial destroyed and had the SS guard it. But that's about it.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:38 AM
3

Since they started being mildly concerned.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:33 AM
4

Think they'll add the bit from the comics where if her arms are held together by a man she loses every ounce of her power?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:30 AM
2

The CDC counts being penetrate by anything, and only being penetrated, as rape.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:46 AM
2

including an instance where they both penetrated me anally Hell that's rape even by the CDC's standards.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:25 PM
5

"I STUDIED GENDER STUDIES!" "Well, that'd be one reason you make less."
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:17 PM
1

I was referring only to the sex, as that seems to be what the comment I was replying to was taking about. Children possessing "child pork" I agree should not be punished if it was not being distributed, but that will never happen because think of the girls! Edit: Child pork ha. Child porn*
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:48 PM
1

Because they're the Nazis and men are the Jews. They put men on a pedestal and then demonize them to get support and power. If men have issues too that power crumbles.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:08 AM
2

She's bitching that it seems to be accurate to the comics. So... Yeah...
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:58 AM
0

Not legally
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:33 PM
3

Just move to Canada.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:12 PM
3

Eating that well is so fucking expensive, but that's not the issue, obese people spend more on food. As you said, too lethargic and lazy.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 03:05 AM
-12

I wasn't. Then again, I was repeatedly almost expelled for beating the shit out of people that bullied my sister.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 03:04 AM
3

Shame those are illegal in Canada afaik.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:17 AM
1

Hahaha "oh it doesn't make it criminal, stop worrying!" Ahahahahaha How hard is it to move to the US?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:38 AM
3

Men are also more likely to push for a raise.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:10 PM
2

If I wasn't banned in all of the ones that'd be "risky" in, I would.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:09 PM
2

Yeah, I was just thinking if how you can replace "Jew" with"men" and any references to the German people with women and get pretty identical statements as those made by many feminists. That guy's comment is way better.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:53 PM
7

Because we are the Jews and this is post WWI Germany.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:42 PM
1

Yes. Standards are lowered when they need to draft people anyway.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 12:05 AM
4

Every time someone says if you believe in gender equality you are a feminist, I say if you believe in gender equality then you are an MRA. 50/50 on utter silence and outraged shrieking.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 12:09 AM
1

Oh my...
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/17 10:04 PM
1

And they wouldn't if they only had women to send? Doubtful.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:59 PM
1

Ehhhhhh, queens were more likely to start wars than kings, so it's probable that there would be just as many wars.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:27 PM
3

It's fair to base it on the ones that are most active and most influential.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:34 PM
3

Because it's inconvenient for feminism and therefore isn't taught.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:28 AM
12

Teach mothers not to kill babies.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 05:12 PM
28

Standards get lowered when people get drafted anyway.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:11 AM
1

For Canada you are incorrect: 16 is age of consent, period. 18 in cases that could be considered exploiting the younger person (like a coach, teacher or boss). 14/15 year olds can consent to have sex with anyone less than five years older than them. 12/13 year olds can consent to sex with anyone less than two years older than them. EDIT: IDK why this was downvoted, Department of Justice
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 01:14 AM
3

Feminism stood for the advancement of women against their wishes because a small subset of them were extremely bored and had entitlement issues.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 03:16 PM
3

The first one is how it is in Canada iirc.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:56 PM
2

Well that didn't take long at all O.o
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:21 PM
4

The draft isn't to get you the best soldiers, it's cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:03 AM
2

Technically not wrong if they're just beating soeone, remember that 3v1 with the migrant and some female cops?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:58 AM
1

Yes it was, but I still meet people that treat it as bible and it's fun to throw it in their face.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:02 PM
1

If you look through the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) from the CDC that gave rise to the 1 in 5 women have been raped in their lifetime nonsense and look at the previous 12 month numbers they're pretty similar, even in that study. You just need to add made to penetrate for the men. EDIT: Here's a copy of a post I made recently that went through it. One slight edit. Using tables 4.1 and 4.2 we see that the estimated number of victims in the 12-months before this stu…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:04 AM
2

Hey look, my comments were removed by automod. Fucking bots. Edit: Actually only mine were. Wonder if I got banned.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:12 AM
3

Just because women complain more doesn't mean they face more harassment. Women have many privileges that men don't have, and one of those is being listened to and not brushed off when they cry foul.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:13 AM
2

The CDC study that got the whole 1 in 5 bullshit started also effectively neuters the narrative that only men rape women. Well, provided you personally consider forced penetration to be rape. Actually just went over this in that r/news article about the guy killing an older gentleman over his (the shooter's) ex-girlfriend, more focused on the domestic violence section, but still. Wasn't even downvoted to oblivion, that was nice. Did have one person that repeatedly attempted to make it seem like …
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:08 AM
2

Neither does anything else lately
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:06 PM
1

I don't understand why people think they should get respect by virtue of existing.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:52 PM
4

Or decided she'd never be able to pay more
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:13 PM
1

Yes, but you admitted you hit her. Doesn't matter the situation.
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 10:09 PM
2

I'd delete this on the off chance it's used against you in the divorce proceedings.
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 04:26 PM
1

Didn't some feminists run a study and find she was even less likable as a man, and Trump even more likable as a woman?
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 08:32 AM
2

Don't go for anything huge I would assume. I am also not a lawyer, however, so I have no idea. Just think this kind of abuse should come with something.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:22 PM
2

Np
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:15 PM
2

True, she wasn't really trying to extort anything other than him finishing the ride, but it could be used as an example in a court room to get some other charge. Maybe. Like I said, at some point there was no precedent for anything. This seems like a good time to set one.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:00 PM
5

The charge is apparently extortion Not to mention for every crime there was at one point no precedent. This could be the case for something new.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 03:40 PM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States Criticism of the government, political advocacy, and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment include obscenity (as determined by the Miller test), fraud, child pornography, speech that incites imminent lawless action, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 03:37 PM
3

No, but the Junos are Canadian and Russel Peters is Canadian, so it's still relevant.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 05:16 PM
5

There is no rape in Canada, technically.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 05:00 PM
1

Except you'd be in jail for life because jail time does not reduce the debt, it keeps ticking.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:29 PM
1

Nuke it and try again? Or just sit back and wait for it to kill itself. Really am interested in a men's strike, shit would go to hell in less than a week.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:21 AM
214

I shared it anyway. Laughs all around.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 06:53 AM
6

He looks almost bored throwing rocks at the car lol
/r/MensRights03/04/17 04:21 AM
52

And then never refers to them again and only mentions women.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:00 AM
2

She doesn't name MGTOW, just mentions there's men that are justified in seeing relationships as a raw deal and just not taking part. But yeah, it's pretty good.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:09 PM
3

TL;DR men are abused the same as women, men in general are not violent, there is zero support, despite hundreds of millions of dollars yearly being raised, for men who are victims. MGTOW is completely justified as women have been given too much power. Apparently if a man calls a suicide hotline saying he wants to kill himself because of abuse the police hunt down his partner to confirm his story, and Victoria is changing the law to throw out men's right to privacy to assume all men that say they…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:06 PM
6

Sexual assault rates are the same for men and women. Same for domestic violence.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:23 AM
6

Women and men, overall, are victims of intimate partner violence at almost the same rate.
/r/MGTOW26/03/17 01:06 AM
1

Assumptions are dangerous, they could be a geth.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:11 PM
3

Because power.
/r/MGTOW22/03/17 06:51 PM
1

Yes she can. She just won't say that's why.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:56 PM
2

That's exactly like saying your own life has no meaning so why don't you kill yourself. In a few million years it won't matter if you were ever born anyway.
/r/MGTOW19/03/17 06:41 AM
1

Women got it for being bored.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:02 AM
6

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11509811/Why-has-everyone-forgotten-about-male-suffrage.html You are aware that 40% of men got the vote at the same time, for being drafted, right?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 04:27 AM
2

Better question is when did it become a movement? Isn't it in the name, going your own way?
/r/MGTOW10/03/17 05:16 AM
45

Why are the companies with the biggest disparities run by women?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/17 12:43 PM
2

The joys of working outside, you just have to deal.
/r/MGTOW01/03/17 04:30 AM
1

I mean, TRP documentary kept getting cancelled due to petitions in Australia. And mansplaining (holy fuck Microsoft why is this word in autocomplete) was used seriously in some branch of government I forget which.
/r/MGTOW10/02/17 04:21 AM
1

I mean, it kind of was when he was a grandfather.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:56 AM
2

Same reason Hitler went after the Jews. Give the people an enemy and you can unite them beneath you. This lets you commit whatever attrocities you want towards the target group and distracts from everything you don't want the people to notice.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:53 AM
1

I mean, they aren't even the athlete in equestrian though. Which is hilarious because they still get drug tested.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 05:37 PM
2

Feminism only needs to fight for rights if men actually already have those rights.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 05:28 PM
10

It also has an episode where they take male rape seriously and admit it happens, then show the woman get off easy because the justice system is a joke. Was actually a pretty good episode.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:34 AM
5

Related searches for 20th century male values 20th Century History 20th Century Music 20th Century Events 20th Century Investments 20th Century US History 20th Century Artists 20th Century Fox 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
/r/MGTOW10/01/17 08:50 PM
1

Oh look, someone knows how to google!
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:44 AM
1

Just like there's no such thing as cancer.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:27 AM
1

Everyone is highly sexualized in society, unless you're ugly as sin.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:57 PM
10

Who's mad as hell.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/17 04:15 AM
1

I fucking hate my country right now.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:25 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:13 AM
40

It was never repealled, so it is technically still law, but anything covered by it and the constitution is overruled by the constitution. She's trying to say because he's not a slave he doesn't need a license. Fucking lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/16 03:22 PM
1

Ha I got banned then asked them twice why and the second time they said they told me the first time and said they'd report me to the admins or something for harassment if I continued to message them, then muted me for 2 days.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:04 AM
5

She had just been roughed up in the chamber. She assumed it was because she was a woman and the fact was, it was because she was useless." I like her.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:48 AM
1

I can think of a couple but it is extremely rare.
/r/MGTOW12/12/16 02:45 PM
2

Historically it was probably camouflage, then tribal war paint, then makeup to scare the shit out of peasants, then mass produced shit. So it was men that started it. Women do wear to much now quite often, but when its well done it can do wonders so it's not that surprising they wear it.
/r/MGTOW12/12/16 04:12 AM
11

If anyone ever said that to me I'd try for as much as I could out of spite.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 12:01 AM
2

So...fast then lol
/r/MensRights08/12/16 08:15 PM
11

Wonder how fast this would get removed on one of the feminism subs...
/r/MensRights08/12/16 07:28 PM
5

Just want to point out 2016 had 252 working days in Canada. If they got 2 days off a month that'd be 24 days, or 9.5% of the work year. So unless they just want 24 more sick days for everyone, they either get a pay cut or to fuck right off.
/r/MGTOW07/12/16 06:26 PM
2

"Foster debate" I think you failed that class.
/r/MGTOW07/12/16 07:23 AM
3

That it's still around. It's mission statement was completed, it can fuck off now. As well as all the other shit in this thread.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 05:21 AM
12

And yet we can have an entire month where everything goes pink.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:16 PM
2

I thought women could do everything men could do, so why can't they defend themselves?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:43 PM
1

Do they? I didn't see anything that said that when I read it, hens to post it note comment.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:16 PM
1

I read that on the title and... Oh man I don't even know...
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:51 AM
10

It does require the signature of both parties and needs to be before the act if I remember the wording correctly. So you basically need a stack of post it notes and a pen beside your bed.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:45 AM
3

4.25%-9.5% of the work year this year in Canada. Yeah, that's kinda bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:30 AM
5

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa wheeze Aaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaaaaa
/r/MensRights05/12/16 03:36 AM
1

In Canada this year, if they got 24 days off, would have worked 9.5% less than everyone else.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 07:24 AM
1

I'd be down just to laugh at them freaking the fuck out.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 07:21 AM
2

So... This is going to come out of their pay right?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:46 AM
5

This is always fun to say.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:22 PM
2

Because then the victim club wouldn't be exclusive.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:01 PM
3

Would a 100lb boy be able to do the same?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:39 PM
25

You can probably appeal that if you go to the department or professor, especially if they wrote that down. It might come bite you in the ass in later assignments, but you can try.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:52 AM
1

Best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 12:11 AM
11

I know. I just want to watch feminists freak the fuck out as society just shuts down for a while. Probably should have tossed in cops.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:00 PM
27

Sanitation. Power workers union. Stuff that runs society.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:20 PM
4

I can't even.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:13 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyBKz1wdK0M
/r/MensRights29/11/16 02:23 PM
16

I assume they'd say it refers to sex not gender.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 02:09 PM
68

handed out baby pacifiers My fucking heroes.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/16 01:29 PM
14

You could try to report the teacher, but I wouldn't expect anything positive to come out of it.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 12:54 AM
2

You should just accept that you aren't going to make her think twice about anything and just try to pass
/r/MensRights28/11/16 07:02 PM
3

Oh I'm sure a few have been shot by distraught wives during at home births.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 06:19 PM
2

Beautiful.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 12:05 PM
1

Happy thanksgiving to you as well.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 08:04 AM
1

Pretty much. Edit: He was already dirt broke though, I think he said rent where he worked was already more then he could afford.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 08:01 AM
1

It's nothing really out there, and I just get drunken pieces occasionally. I do know one guy that had to declare bankruptcy because he went into dept to pay support and rent, but the child support debts and the child support missed while bankrupt was still waiting for him when it was over. I don't know what it's called in Canada but in the US it's priority depts or something. Which is hilarious because it's what fucked him over (mostly, he was bad with money but it didn't help).
/r/MensRights24/11/16 07:57 AM
6

I mean the guys pay rent, they pay utilities, they pay child support, they pay for food, and they don't have a life anymore, or the ability to save money. The women, who I am no longer friends with because they're scum, sit pretty and make an extra 20-25% of their exes salary on top of what they make, then do their best to make the kids despise the father and attempt to sabotage the father's visiting rights but still get paid.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 07:21 AM
39

It's literally in the side bar of the feminist subs that anything that challenges their view will be removed. They say anything not sourced, but that is a lie.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 07:15 AM
1

I have a very biased view from having friends being neutered by payments, and former friends that laugh about not needing the child support money they get and thus just spend it all on themselves.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 07:06 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights24/11/16 06:34 AM
6

But then women wouldn't be able to milk child support, and we can't have that.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 05:49 AM
1

I'm starting to despise being Canadian.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 05:45 AM
2

It's called a disorder, scientifically. I'm wrong legally.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:11 AM
2

I think sex and gender are the same thing, and anything else is a mental illness. Transitioning is just genital mutilation. Supporting the idea doesn't seem to make them any less suicidal. Looks like an illness to me.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:07 AM
15

Because they have a monopoly on not thinking transgender is a real thing? Right.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:18 AM
16

I'm not a feminist? Nor am I particularly radical.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 11:39 PM
12

What the hell is a Terfer?
/r/MensRights20/11/16 11:26 PM
25

Biological sex determines gender. Everything else is sick people.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 10:50 PM
3

"Why is it my responsibility to block..." Because that's what it's fucking FOR.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 09:27 PM
2

I wish.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 01:51 AM
12

I like stunning them into silence when they complain about random shit by quoting a radio station where I live: "just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right." Blows their minds.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:20 PM
4

Because #patriarchy
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:22 AM
1

Men can't breastfeed, the wage gap is a lie, men have no reproductive rights other than the right to be a wallet, it's not written but a woman (in Canada, where I live) has not been successfully charged since before 1991 for being topless because no one gives a damn. Asking for a raise and speaking are not things that should be regulated by the government.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:29 PM
1

Name a right men have that women do not? That piece of legislation is no longer required. (edit: for women)
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:42 PM
1

I get pissed when they want more, when there is not a single right that men have that women do not, but there are rights women have that men do not. As well as multiple institutions that discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:26 PM
3

"mansplaining" is women taking offense at how men talk to other men. They're literally pissed that they're being treated equally.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 04:26 AM
2

Vergara’s legal team wants to quiz both women under deposition to probe Loeb’s sexual past I'm sorry, what? Why? How is this okay?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:43 PM
1

Ha, everyone knows it's not abuse if the "victim" is male!
/r/MensRights15/11/16 07:54 PM
9

Ha. I have up on thinking things will get better, and instead am resolved to watch the world burn.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 07:50 PM
2

They can't not have seen this coming...right?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 06:40 PM
1

"If my mansplaining (holy fuck that came up in my autocorrect) triggers you then you can fuck off to your safe space!" Ha. A very similar line got my slapped a couple weeks ago. Love it.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 09:09 PM
3

"But I don't like it when people yell things I don't agree with!"
/r/MensRights12/11/16 06:31 PM
1

I'd like to know as well so i can build a wall there first. We don't want 'em.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:30 AM
2

If feminists actually looked at statistics, there would be no feminists. There would be no movement. There would be no cult of yahoos to manipulate. There would be no victim culture to get high off of supporting. There would be a bunch of salty women that are mad adults have to deal with the odd crass comment.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:28 AM
1

Hahahaha Ahahahahahahaha Baaahahahahahahahahahahaha Oh man, that's rich.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:20 AM
5

More like low taxes are too great.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:03 AM
3

Oh man. I need this.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:02 AM
2

We don't want her
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:43 PM
1

Last time I did that I literally got slapped.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:22 AM
1

Them for picking a fight. I'm not going to allow them or you to try to tell me actions only have consequences for men.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 10:33 PM
2

Raised to never hit a lady, but are they a lady if they hit you?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 12:51 PM
37

I hope you don't just let them. That's really rude.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:11 PM
13

I got banned for saying we don't live in a patriarchy, we live in a rich kids club. It's actually an upvoted comment too...
/r/MensRights06/11/16 01:16 PM
2

Not really, homosexuals with children are still either a mother or a father, and in many places can marry.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 04:29 PM
5

I haven't actually seen some of these names before lol
/r/MensRights05/11/16 01:59 AM
1

There's a showing in Toronto that was posted here a couple days ago
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:19 PM
2

This would be so hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:12 PM
1

I kind of want this to happen now.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 12:21 AM
1

Please, someone, post this in r/feminism. And then link it here.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:57 PM
1

These people are all under the assumption they were perfect little angels apparently.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:55 PM
2

I think it's bullshit that what she said is allowed, and yet if it was reversed there would be mass outrage. Basically I'm pissed more people aren't pissed.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:26 PM
3

ALRIGHTY, 16 days for them to protest this. Let's see how long it takes.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 03:29 PM
1

The point is, how would people react if a guy said "October is when we buy a bunch of pink shit, who knows why?"
/r/MensRights03/11/16 03:25 PM
1

It's mostly awareness, because supporting men's causes isn't nearly as lucrative as women's.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 03:23 PM
1

Who tried to fund the film so they could spout misandrist nonsense*
/r/MensRights03/11/16 02:07 PM
1

Yeah, pretty much.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:42 PM
1

http://archive.is/rZNjk It's been entirely ignored.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:25 PM
1

It was already linked, with the title "curious as to your thoughts on the validity of this study"
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:05 PM
1

Hahaha thanks
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:42 PM
1

Maybe I'll just make a throwaway and do it anyway...
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:35 PM
1

So when I laugh at women they shouldn't get upset? I'll keep that in mind.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:32 PM
1

I'm banned though... They wouldn't even tell me why (though I can assume)...
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:30 PM
1

I fucking hope so.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:23 PM
3

You'll never see this is r/feminism... Well, you would if I wasn't banned, but there goes that plan.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:16 PM
4

Ha. She'd get a sister of the year golden raspberry so I don't really care.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 09:06 AM
6

It's just a whole bunch of "man up" and "this is discrimination" bullshit that's hilariously sad and ironic.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 04:31 AM
6

If it's anything like watching my sister getting the shit kicked out of her, I'm pretty numb to that particular feeling at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 03:28 AM
12

Ha, you just described my sister. Which probably proves the point actually...
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 02:05 AM
22

That would be ideal, yes. Sometimes you won't know until they do hit someone though.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 12:09 AM
86

Idk, if I was dating someone and they hit someone much larger than them, then got a shot back in return that took the fight out of her, I'd probably just laugh and make sure both parties are ok.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/16 07:19 PM
12

Humana have been fighting fucking everything since we've existed. Nature is fucking metal
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/16 05:57 PM
3

It's literally hard wired into us by biology/evolution. Men are disposable and women must be protected. Fuck that noise, maybe 10,000 years ago before we built cities.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:49 PM
3

Yea, but nothing ends up happening. If something does happen they get something like 30% of the sentence a guy would.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:37 PM
3

Yea it's serious shit.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:28 PM
10

I've had a lot of concussions, so if someone ever tried to do this to me either they'd get fucking dropped, or I'd end up in a hospital after blacking out the first time they make solid contact with my head.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:07 PM
3

Unfortunately the ones that are left are louder, larger, and generally more destructive.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:03 PM
3

It's an old law from when women didn't work that just never went away.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:00 PM
1

Oh I know, ad hominem arguments were unfortunately only discouraged if they made the majority of the class uncomfortable. We actually still got the highest marks in the class because the teacher was impressed that we could make arguments for a subject we were really against. The "winner" of the debate was, as was always the case at my highschool, decided via class vote which was unanimous against us.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 12:34 PM
1

You'd be surprised. I went to a Catholic school, and for an English class had to debate for women being able to be priests. My partner and I were rather vocal atheists, and we "lost" the debate because the other team quoted me from earlier in the year in another class (Religion) saying I thought religions as an institution were a bunch of bullshit. High school is fucked up in Canada.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:27 AM
3

Is this the article that either glosses over or ignores that they stopped the study because two people died?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:18 AM
-6

Except during the with hunts. Then they got burnt for being able to read.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/16 02:24 PM
-6

Pao, right I'm the wallet?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 11:31 AM
10

https://twitter.com/tornadoliese/status/770120437338628096 this is great
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/16 11:02 PM
3

"As a baby behaves" Apt description.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/16 04:19 AM
16

Yeah he was clearly out of breath.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/16 03:25 PM
2

Oh yeah ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/16 04:24 AM
3

True, you are burning money. But I'm an asshole, and shit like that makes people squirm. It's fucking great.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/16 03:31 AM
1

True, but some people just aren't worth dealing with.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/16 01:02 AM
-1

And this is why you ignore her and take a nap until she leaves.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/16 10:02 PM
18

You can remove them, technically. The issue is it's a chick, and he is not, which can make this a bit of a gray area because of that whole "don't hit girls" bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/16 10:01 PM
2

Not going to lie, that guy's got some serious patience. Though he probably could have solved the problem faster by just ignoring her and taking a nap.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/16 09:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter