guntis_regards Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	Why does this sub get linked to TBP? it's the starting point which is the problem. if someone's most fundamental belief upon which everything else is built is something like 'all women have certain common traits which can be understood in order to be manipulated such that I can fulfil the desires I have towards them', then there's no point in me even starting a discussion with that person. We can't start talking specifics because our basic worldviews are too different. I also find his/her fundamental beliefs offensive and degrading…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/05/14 05:33 PM
1	The premise of this subreddit is ridiculous. pretty much. reminds me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjuGCJJUGsg except with climate sceptics replace anyone subscribing to 'red pill beliefs', and scientists with 'everyone else'. framing the 'debate' as if these are two equally legitimate positions vying for supremacy is just misleading.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/05/14 05:25 PM
37	Shooting at UCSB, guy posts video explaining that he did it because women "throw themselves at obnoxious men, instead of me, the supreme gentleman" video and news story link included. this is what happens if you're really angry and really entitled - you end up believing bullshit dogma about how women are inferior to try and feel better about yourself. When that doesn't work you go on a fucking killing spree. god fucking dammit.	/r/TheRedPill	24/05/14 04:38 PM
0	Insecurity the point is very obvious, i dunno if you're a troll or you honestly just don't understand why people are ridiculing it, i'm gonna explain it anyway cuz i'm bored. people who find the analogy ridiculous, amusing, absurd etc find it absurd precisely because it oversells these supposed risks of dating. people who have this reaction aren't failing to understand the analogy, as you claim, rather their experience of dating is so different from the one of fear and stress suggested by this analogy that…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/14 08:33 PM
1	Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage? i really wanna meet you in real life, can we go out for coffee?	/r/askTRP	23/05/14 07:29 PM
-1	Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage? hahahaha oh man	/r/askTRP	23/05/14 07:28 PM
0	Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage? it cracks me up how you spent so long on this. you are such a fucking loser!	/r/askTRP	23/05/14 07:21 PM
1	No amount of self-sacrifice can win her heart, ex. 539. you were already friendzoned before life hit you. literally while you were in the womb you were friendzoned by all women, past, present and yet to exist.	/r/TheRedPill	22/05/14 11:20 PM
2	No amount of self-sacrifice can win her heart, ex. 539. you're hilarious man. you should be one of those dudes who rants about stuff.	/r/TheRedPill	22/05/14 11:19 PM
1	[META]How did you guys get here? snap	/r/PussyPass	22/05/14 11:15 PM
0	Guy finds his girlfriend in bed with a stranger. She sends him an email explaining her justification for cheating. or is she bluffing that she's not bluffing...the plot thickens...	/r/TheRedPill	22/05/14 11:12 PM
16	Guy finds his girlfriend in bed with a stranger. She sends him an email explaining her justification for cheating. ah yes of course. the old quadruple bluff.	/r/TheRedPill	22/05/14 08:49 PM
2	[FR] ClassicPunk walks away. priceless	/r/TheRedPill	22/05/14 08:12 PM
1	Does it make any sense to "not respect women"? sure bud ;)	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/05/14 12:41 PM
2	Why do Redpillers and Red Pill Women think they have the moral standing to refer to some women as 'sluts' or 'riding the cock carousel' when they themselves often advocate for plenty of casual sex? it's an empirical question, one that would be quite interesting using some panel data if there is any. I think that if you did a study of traits that men find attractive/unnattractive in women over time, you'd find that chastity would start off high on the list until around the 1950s where it would start to decline, continuing to decline to today. I think the decline will continue. Going back to your original post, you say that saying a women is a slut is like calling an unemployed alcoholic a d…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 09:06 PM
1	Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage? ok, if you insist that your theory isn't even falsifiable (it might be a hundred years but no matter) then...you can't assert that it's true for you, much less that it's true for all people. Here's another unfalsifiable theory - there is a part of your mind that is unconscious which structures your every desire. Every manifestation of desire in your conscious mind actually comes unbidden from your unconscious, which takes as its raw material traumatic events that occurred in your early childhood…	/r/askTRP	20/05/14 09:00 PM
1	Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage? no, it's not. this isn't really debatable. What you've described is just a theory about behaviour. It's similar to the utility maximisation hypothesis in economics. It's a theory, neuroscience hasn't advanced far enough to tell us whether it's actually true.	/r/askTRP	20/05/14 08:23 PM
5	Why do Redpillers and Red Pill Women think they have the moral standing to refer to some women as 'sluts' or 'riding the cock carousel' when they themselves often advocate for plenty of casual sex? It's one thing to say 'I have it, and I can't control it', and another thing entirely to say 'this preference is true for all men'. The second statement is obviously false.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 08:21 PM
4	Why do Redpillers and Red Pill Women think they have the moral standing to refer to some women as 'sluts' or 'riding the cock carousel' when they themselves often advocate for plenty of casual sex? I'm going to argue that I'm 100% right, given that I said 'socially determined to some extent'. But listen. I agree with you. I think that it's trivially true that there is a biological basis to sexual attraction. But the question is, to what extent does that biological basis determine the conscious, real life manifestation of my sexual taste in women? The answer is, no one knows. No one knows, especially not anyone arguing from an evolutionary psychology perspective. You should be really skepti…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 08:09 PM
10	Why do Redpillers and Red Pill Women think they have the moral standing to refer to some women as 'sluts' or 'riding the cock carousel' when they themselves often advocate for plenty of casual sex? The sexual tastes of both men and women are also socially determined to some extent. Following your social argument again, it's not just some essential fact of human nature that men tend be attracted to chaste women. It obviously has something to do with the genesis of social norms that we talked about earlier. Thus a man's taste in women will just as much follow the evolution of social norms as social judgement about behaviours will.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 07:14 PM
9	Why do Redpillers and Red Pill Women think they have the moral standing to refer to some women as 'sluts' or 'riding the cock carousel' when they themselves often advocate for plenty of casual sex? the stigmas attached to most of these "moral judgements" as you're calling them are highly related to what was good for society when they were invented. Do you also agree that the reason why we're having this debate is because the society we live in now has no social need for the cultural imperative - 'women shouldn't sleep around' - any longer? If so, isn't this particular 'standard for a relationship with many guys' a kind of hangover effect of a bygone era with no social basis anymore? If you…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 06:43 PM
2	Redpill men (and women), what do you think of advice such as this? here's a tip: you're not gonna get anyone half-intelligent to take you seriously if you take seriously an article entitled 'men should assert their dominance over women through anal sex'.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 04:46 PM
2	Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage? It's obviously entirely your own prerogative what kind of relationship dynamic makes you most content, and I respect that you acknowledge that women don't need to be part of a traditional relationship to be content. I think that the empirical claim of universal hypergamy across women is false. I think it's probably true for some fraction of the population, and hence basing dating strategy on it will probably yield some positive results. The extrapolations that people on TRP make from this succes…	/r/askTRP	20/05/14 02:44 PM
4	Does it make any sense to "not respect women"? 'It just seems that we hate all women because the majority of modern women act deplorably.' in other words, I only hate women who act deplorably; most modern women act deplorably => i hate most modern women. I, and anyone not indoctrinated, would obviously disagree with the second statement. the fact that you bring this up in support of how trp is not a 'vile cesspool of misogyny' is laughable. you're deeeep down the rabbit hole guy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 02:17 PM
7	What is Rape? he can't reply he's too busy having sex with children.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 02:05 PM
2	Why give power to your partner? essentially it is, because all your final counterexample always boils down to 'why present your significant other access to all your investments if they'll be indifferent either way etc etc' - the important element is 'why expose yourself to significant risk'. It's not really possible to answer your question because I'm unsure whether you're talking about 'you' personally, or if you're referring to the general 'you'. If we're talking about you personally, then you and you alone have the criteria…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/14 01:59 PM
2	Curious where I went wrong. orbiter orbiter	/r/askTRP	20/05/14 12:40 PM
1	Is NAWALT always true, without exception? essentially what you're saying is that people prefer to associate with people they perceive to be similar value as themselves....why do my eyes hurt...	/r/askTRP	20/05/14 12:31 PM
-2	Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage? yeah the problem with the historical argument is that it kind of belies the whole evolutionary psychology basis of the entire edifice. it goes something like this: the quality of your woman is an important element to your societal status; a woman known to be 'whorish' is a lower status woman; => hence men prefer chaste women. However, cultural shifts, i.e. women being able to work and not being solely dependent on a man mean that women no longer have to care about portraying themselves as 'chast…	/r/askTRP	20/05/14 11:50 AM