TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gushisgosh Archive

View 1 post and 86 comments by gushisgosh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Questiongushisgosh/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

To be fair, they just cracked into wife beating husbands... Knowing what we know about DV, it's clear that in the process they would get plenty of evidence of wife beating on husbands as a result. The logical approach, considering the more modern rational mindset is to crack down on both. And if they are doing it right they will probably reduce the amount of spousal victimization a lot through it, way more than in more urban settings which are dominated by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 08:11 AM
1

No, but people beg for sex out of need for sexual intimacy and validation they can't get otherwise. People beg for stuff they can't get otherwise. Of course, one can just be overtly nice, but that's not coherent with a rapist by coercion. Specially considering it's first bribing and begging then if it fails coercion is used. All of those together in that order amounts to a tactic to get a yes when otherwise one wouldn't. Which implies really bellow average ability to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 03:15 PM
1

Your argument is that he begged needlessly. He doesn't strike the canadian type to me, considering how many times he coerced needlessly as well. And for christ sake, are you suggesting he isn't physically repulsive?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 08:14 AM
1

You said he begged because he wanted to exert his power. Do you understand how much of an oxymoron that is? Saying "he paid because it turned him on" yeah, maybe, I get that, but saying "he coerced because it turned him on" when before using coercion he begged, sometimes he just begged. You take that he used coercion some times and then uses "he was an abusive fuck" as an explanation to why he begged. By his account and the witnesses, he first attempted to bribe, then he begged and only then he …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 08:32 PM
1

How begging is in any way a show of power? Begging to get off power? lol! No, he begged so he wouldn't have to use coercion, because he didn't got off power, he got off in pretending he was in any way desirable or attractive, that's why the voyerism thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 06:38 PM
1

Well, yes, they did it to hurt kids from the outgroup. They didn't beg though. They just groomed, threatened and violated kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 06:14 PM
1

That's not how those encounters are described. We don't have him only black mailing, but also begging and bribing. Does that sounds like being sexually successful? Begging just to masturbate in the same room as them?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 06:00 PM
1

Well, why do such things if one can get it easy? Was he able to fuck his wives easily?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 05:48 PM
1

Weinstein. Are you going to say he doesn't have a problem getting women to suck his dick? That he didn't? I'm broke as shit, and I'm close to hitting the wall and I have no problem getting women to suck my dick, actually I have a problem with having sex with women and getting them to not suck my dick. (I'm not a fan of oral sex)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 05:34 PM
1

Sexually, certainly a great looking dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 04:57 PM
1

There's a difference between rational selection and instinct. Wanna know who was loaded? Weinstein. Wanna tell me he didn't hit the wall?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 03:59 PM
1

Well, if women make the choice of not sticking around because of financial issues it says nothing about physical/sexual attractiveness. Yes, women can be mercenary with their whole life, what's the point? Money doesn't make you a desirable sex object, it does make you, regardless of sex, a desirable victim to be financially exploited. One of the reasons women don't marry their paid dicks is because they know exactly what the bimbos are going to do because that's exactly what they would do in suc…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 03:25 PM
1

Keep telling yourself that... You sound like those weaboos spending on twitch thots "she cares about me" no, she pretends to care, she pretends to be attracted. People like feeling interesting, that's why people feign interest. Sometimes they just feign the reason they are interested in you sexually or just at all. Most friendships are loaded with utilitarian interests but with a pretense of common interests and sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 07:04 PM
1

Nothing, if you can spend money in order to get laid it doesn't mean you haven't hit the wall. You said men don't hit the wall because they can pay for sex. I said women also can pay for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 03:35 PM
1

They are relevant, you said men can fuck if they have money, so can women. That's definitely not the same thing as not hitting the wall, actually when you starts to need to pay to fuck then you hit the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 09:23 AM
1

20% of all prostitutes, that seems like a reasonable proportion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 09:53 AM
1

Not as rare as you think. Technically people making use of prostitutes is already an infrequent phenomenon proportionally to the population, but the proportion between both are way close to 1
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 01:44 AM
1

Women with money can always get guys, all they have to do is be willing to dispense with cash. Man whores exist, and women do make use of it, even though they make goddamn sure no one talks about it even if they are caught doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 01:58 PM
1

It's in the article, you found the article. Do you want me to do what? Post the relevant charts in the article and walls of text? if you want I can link videos talking about the article in detail about this issue, but wouldn't that be the equivalent of leading the witness?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 09:29 AM
1

Second wife's father is also a real estate developer. What would trump's family get from that? What would her family get from that? And I don't even have to bring up melania. He got a lot from that, a brilliant fashion market director, a charismatic first lady. She comes very close to his first wife in profitability. The trump's business are family business, the trump family is a business family as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 10:06 PM
1

Guys do. Not only they hit the wall, but just like for women, that's one of the reasons for a midlife crisis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 09:59 PM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/29/trump-czechoslovakia-communism-spying Here's first what his first wife family got from the marriage. What he got? Clearly enough insider knowledge not to do a tower in moscol and a lot of business from soviet officials (even if just using his hotels and courses in diplomatic/business missions) and goddamn ivana, who was a brilliant woman and became essential to his business. That's just his first marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 09:57 PM
1

look for forced envelopment, which is just rape by another name, and compare to forced penetration and similar stuff, but those will be classed as rape. Then look for who was identified as the perpetrator in forced envelopment cases. All last year, mind you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 09:39 PM
1

Are you going to play dumb for a fantasy? Just when it comes to his daughter marriage, it's clear he and his family got a lot of access to israel because of that. Not to mention no jewish mom would let a marriage like that go through besides for business reasons, and really good business reasons at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 07:10 AM
1

Just go to the cdc and look at the figure of one year. It shouldn't be hard to see it if you aren't absurdly biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 07:07 AM
1

Yeah, pretty much. He fucks pornstars on the side, clearly he didn't married for sex. And it's also clear he didn't married for a romantic relationship. But he got a lot of business out of it though... But not from his lovers, not from his prostitutes. Now, does that mean they didn't have sex and didn't enjoyed themselves while at it? No. Does that mean that they had no form of friendship? Of course not. Just that neither were the motivation, at least not for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 10:35 PM
1

Yeah. Because marriage for interests and political marriages aren't a thing, at all. God, even his marriages when he was young and fit were clearly fueled by business interests in both parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 07:41 PM
1

Harsher laws don't work. Increased frequency of punishment works, but only if due process rights are respected. And the biggest reason most perpetrators get away with it is because the victim knows the perpetrator and is concerned about the perpetrator's well being. The second is because dealing with a judicial procedure is hard, but in order for this to work is has to be hard. This last part doesn't work like this just for rape, it also works for theft, robbery, assault, specially in places wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:48 PM
1

Michael jackson demonstrably was falsely accused. I never met a single avid defender of R. Kelly. Not even online. Specially not part of the mainstream media.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:37 PM
1

I've worked with prostitutes. Believe me, most have a lot of marketable skills, most even use it. They are in it for the passion, apparently. What do you call men who sleep with pretty much any willing breathing person and enjoy themselves while at it? A man-whore is a good term. They don't even have to get paid, I certainly was called one without ever having accepted money for sex, goddamn, I was called one when I was a virgin for no other reason than their perspective. Could it be that whores …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:36 PM
1

Well, you mean the obscure thing that almost no one says, but everyone is saying about people who cardi B drugged and raped, even the people appalled by her comments? Now, it's goddamn obvious that if you hang with monkey you are going to have shit thrown at you, doesn't make throwing shit something nice and doesn't make monkeys into moral actors deserving of praise. I've been victimized countless times, including sexually, being groped is just part of a weekend for me, and I god damn know that …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:28 PM
1

All of them have their careers hurt on the mainstream because of it. Rap used to have a bad fame over this sort of stuff and still does. but cardi B is a mainstream feminist icon. So is amy shummer, so was lennah dunhan until she defended a friend from a rape accusation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:19 PM
1

And they get flak and their careers are ruined on mainstream rap because of it. those who admit doing it at least, and those who write lyrics about it even when they say "it's just a story". but of course, their careers is also at least centered on the controversy that at least the lyrics bring. But that's not cardi B. She's lauded over being a feminist icon of female empowerment, more than half of the positive comments on her instagram that lay a reason for why she's so great use her status as …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:17 PM
1

No, let can imply consent or inaction both in future and past forms. in this case it implies consent. Considering trump just admitted to respecting a woman's withdraw of consent right after having paid for her luxury furniture, and lauded her for rejecting him because "she's faithful", instead of saving his face from rejection with "she's stupid, she doesn't know what she lost" or "she was playing hard to get and I have no patience with it", then it shows he didn't said that just to save face bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:10 PM
1

I don't think the "grab them by the pussy" is literal. "Grab him by the cock" rarely is literal, just like "grab him by the stomach". Also, all while admitting to have being rejected after spending a small fortune on a woman's furniture, not allowed even a lip kiss, being respectful about it and even promping her up by saying it's because she's faithful, which he didn't have to do in order to save his face from the rejection (the common female response to such rejection is "he is stupid, he does…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:06 PM
1

And right after talking about how a woman didn't let him even kiss her, how he respected it, and how she probably didn't let him because she's married, all after having bought furniture to her. So basically he lied about his sexual allure, claiming his fame gives him a lot of it, all after admitting to not have that sexual allure and because he admitted not having that sexual allure. Basically they are taking trump in denial about hitting the wall and twist it into him admitting sexual assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:59 PM
1

You claim that "we are going to have a good time" is the same thing as "x let me" then you are a retard. Me saying "I drive my friends' cars, they let me because I'm famous" after saying "I tried to drive my friend's, we got to the store for parts shopping on my count, I tried to mount my friend's bike by my friend didn't let me" is the same thing is "I told them we were going to have a good time, then I drugged them and drove their car to a hotel." and then saying "these friends were all awake …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:54 PM
1

So he got away with it because there was procedural misconduct? And he still lost a lot in his career. Saying that he's still somewhat afloat because he still got fans who for some weird reason really like his music and because he got friends in the industry is retarded. Rylie Reid admitted to raping a kid when she lost her virginity, and got no flak over it, zero, I just learned this to be honest. Amy shummer admitted to fucking a guy so drunk that he was passed out. Got no damage to her career…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:46 PM
1

By the last year CDC statistics, just as many women rape men, and with a consistency in the result when asking the women if they ever forced, coerced, drugged or took advantage of someone's incapacitated state to have sex, as well as when you ask men if they have being coerced, drugged, forced or had their unconsciousness taken advantage of and when asked the sex of who done it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:39 PM
1

She denies having sex for money, but, she said "these men" (in a reference to the men drugging and robbing) where conscious and willing participants. Considering she was talking about the men she admitted to drugging and robbing she just admitted having sex with the men she drugged and robbed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:36 PM
1

Well, this is actually done a lot, both the sexual assault, the drugging and raping, in juvenile detention centers, in foster care, and on retirement homes, it doesn't generate much outrage, otherwise you would have known it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:34 PM
1

"his wife beating" you mean his demonstrably mutually violent relationship with a demonstrably more violent and unstable wife with which he divorced over how toxic the relationship was, and which had a demonstrable negative effect on the publicity of his career. Wanna know who wasn't hurt negatively over being a sexual assaulter and a husband beater? Courtney love. Well, besides the arrests.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:33 PM
1

Eminen got a lot of flak, lost contracts, was harassed and worst, all for a character he made to be as offensive as possible. That's not cardi B manufactured character she made to make her show more interesting, that's how she presents herself to be as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:30 PM
1

You can't say women are more picky and men put more value on appearance on the same breath, specially considering the evidence. A woman will have a child with a man for no other reason than his appearance, but if he's perceived sufficiently lacking on other regards he probably won't know he fathered a child, sometimes he won't even know he had sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:26 PM
1

"rape by deception" is a thing in her feminists circles, so yeah, rape. but that's being passed around like an hypothetical situation, didn't sounded like one to me, but I can give them that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:19 PM
1

Probably both. Cardi B asked her boyfriend if she's good in bed, he says "well, probably good, I don't remember..." lol!
/r/MensRights19/04/19 05:01 PM
1

People, there's a reason details aren't out, it's so pitch forks aren't grabbed before the evidence is out and the victim is ready to come out.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 04:44 PM
1

I get your point, but still, she was a close acquaintance of his girlfriend, enough to at least maybe call that DV.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:45 PM
1

Technically you could sue the judge. Seriously, he called a woman who you barely knew your girlfriend in court without any reason to do so.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:43 PM
1

Karen, your fluff argues better than this woman...
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:06 PM
1

And the look don't touch policy only applies from clients to employees apparently.
/r/MGTOW06/12/17 02:57 AM
3

That's actually pretty based. They will ignore it, of course.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:46 PM
1

Please, I need the link.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:04 PM
1

More of the later than the first. Women don't like been shoved in their face that they have to pay for sex.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:04 PM
1

No, actually it's sorta the opposite, manspreading is hot, therefore it isn't ok unless you are being objectified, and it's ok to objectify you because you manspread, so it means you are asking for it. look at the video of the guy walking in newyork and women justifying the other women behavior and you'll see western women are like muslim men and women.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:02 PM
1

Why do you think they complain, you fucking moron? Because it literally makes them weak in the knees. Newsflash, wanna know why men most frequently dress conservatively and not like these guys in the picture? Because western women are like muslim men (and muslim women), completely lacking sense of personal responsibility and restrain. It's an eye opening experience to be shamed for "sexual harassment" by being nothing but bare chested while the accuser cups a feel while making the accusation and…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:00 PM
1

Don't be like a feminist. It's neither. though we can assume the journalists want contacts for "further research". A quick walk on any female populated website with a picture of a hot man and you'll see women asking who the guy is for "further research" which usually means more fap material.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:57 PM
1

This is not news, sites like this exist since I was 15. (though less frequent and with less random photos because cameras weren't a norm back then and smartphones didn't existed)
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:54 PM
1

I can, but he wouldn't admit to it. No, I can't, a male prostitute is happy just getting clients.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:06 PM
1

Look up. It's not victim blaming, neither. Flaunting stuff around without due precautions is not smart. Gosh, I was fucking ten when my mother taught me not to leave my drink unattended, I was also 10 when my sister told me not to "leave a woman hanging" or things could turn sour. That's not victim blaming. But somehow people say it's.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:05 PM
1

If you aren't capable of walking yourself it would make a sense to trust it with a stranger.
/r/PussyPass19/10/17 04:18 PM
2

So someone is saving your (or your partner's) ass and you wouldn't let them carry your kid? That's a bit extreme.
/r/PussyPass26/09/17 12:36 AM
1

If she's sick, no, if she's, yes. If she's not sick and care about the baby, why would she let the man tire himself out when he could be carrying the baby for her? But if she's sick, yeah, normal. Sorta stupid to carry both at the same time, but a real man does it in one trip, right? lol.
/r/PussyPass25/09/17 06:44 AM
1

It's a crime to rape someone, which she probably did. But the moron didn't took the test and police didn't asked for a test so it will be hard to prove.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:31 PM
1

Congratulations, she's not degrading herself, you are. "I have no desire to give a girl a swirlie, absoluetly none." And yet here you are...
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 02:06 AM
2

I bet it's more than that. Like, one in 5 men, and 9 in ten of those will talk about it like it's a badge of honor and drink their sorrows.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 04:01 AM
2

Honestly, I can take some yelling, there are worst things in life than that... Hiding black eyes is way harder than acting cool.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:58 AM
1

I almost puked.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:56 AM
1

I looked very happy as a child, I still look very happy when I'm with sis. Gosh I want to puke!
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:29 AM
1

They don't have to allow. That's the whole point. And today, many men (and women) are learning how to tear toxic bonds with family members. (mostly men are learning from women)
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:23 PM
2

agreed.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:23 AM
2

No one will let that happen. No one wants to rule a wasteland.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:38 AM
1

It bought it on the west. I encourage you to take a deeper sight at things.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:11 AM
1

It's not about desire, it's about a mental experiment on the condition of male disposibility. And no, not literal mountains of bodies. As we see from women complaining about the strike on marriages, it doesn't take much for a shortage of males to bee felt.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:10 AM
1

Well, on a WWIII civilian casualties would ensue, but if you research a little you will see how less civilian casualties hit women compared to civilian men.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:23 AM
1

Ok, on the first I can easily do it. eastern feminism is much more docile and much more focused on making it more functional for women to work or stay at home, while still retaining responsibility for managing their own choices on how to balance work/life/marriage/childbearing choices. It still maintains the traditional male role, but cut men a little slack for their sacrifices. It's not perfect, but much less toxic than on the west. (for example, it still uses the same traditional techniques of…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:21 AM
1

I'd actually say, look at eastern europe remnants from ex soviet union.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:04 AM
3

I highly doubt it. No nuclear weapons would be used, on that you can bet on the bigwigs desire to have something to rule, not a waste land.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:02 AM
1

No, just recent account. No redditer, no MRA either, so I'm kinda new to this place. Don't worry, just argue.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:01 AM
1

Well. have you researched into eastern europe attitudes towards males? And also, yes, they are expected, but if they don't don't they can refuse, where's the bargain power. Now men have been learning to refuse And though many have decided to withdraw in drones, their mere existence fuels the state, which in turn fuels women's ambitions, which in turn fuels status quo.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:59 AM
1

Well, by a technicality you don't, but most people here will act as if you did for the sake of equality. Technically any rights you gain are either human rights or women rights, but most MRA will fight for your rights on the grounds of "it's not like feminists are going to do this job anyway, and someone gotta do it, so it might well be us." mentality.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:08 AM
1

That's why men's rights (and actually any human rights issues) is inherently libertarian.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:51 AM
1

Ok, let's agree with what you are saying and compare it with data. Men die earlier, of more violent causes, well, you get the gist. So lets compare your prized group with markers of oppression, those being the supper oppressed black gay females and white straight males. Violence in general. White straight males are more likely to be the recipient of violence than black gay females. Violent deaths. White straight males also more likely to die violent deaths than black gay females. Wealth and fund…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:39 AM
1

Good question. i bet there are some out there but I can't point out of memory any serious extremism (like advocating violence, genocide, etc). But I'm sure there is and that I've found it, just can't remember. Nut jobs exist everywhere. The problem is when people give power to them.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:23 AM
1

No and yes. not a MRA here, but the issue seem to be more directed at a libertarian world view which means "do as you fucking want without fucking with others" which means no enforcing of gender roles, but no suppressing either.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:10 AM
1

No shit, sherlock, and potatoes aren't the opposite of oranges. No one on anywhere but in some very dark corners of feminist blogs thinks like that.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter