guspe Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
22	How far are we from artificial womb technology?		guspe	/r/MensRights	18/05/13 02:17 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Feminists: It's always about you, right? It's real pain, but it's not based on reality. I understand, this is actually something I had not thought about. I just want to point out that being asked to explain yourself can easily make you feel like shit. Victims often are already in a position where they lack basic securities. This applies to mental health patients as well. The natural process of earning the trust of someone who can help you, in this context, can make you feel like no one cares.	/r/MensRights	31/01/14 10:03 PM
5	Feminists: It's always about you, right? How can you tell if the person is an actual victim? Would you put her up to a humiliating process of proving her pain is real? Isn't every pain real, by the way? I think it's better to not ask too many questions and eventually help someone who is faking it than to lose a real victim amidst bureaucracy.	/r/MensRights	31/01/14 09:23 PM
1	"Men's Centres Badly Needed In Canada, Advocates Say". What are the majority of comments? "Man up" Dude, it's not one or the other. It's actually both, can't you see? Women weren't sent to war because: They were perceived as less capable and weak They were being protected That's why I'm saying from the very beginning that this is a complicated matter. And that's why your argument alone proves nothing. You're ignoring half of the problem. Ironically, you're doing exactly what feminists do: feminists ignore number 2, you're ignoring number 1.	/r/MensRights	01/10/13 04:22 PM
1	"Men's Centres Badly Needed In Canada, Advocates Say". What are the majority of comments? "Man up" Were slaves in Greece not treated as objects simply because they weren't sent to die in war? The fact that slaves weren't used in the Confederate Army until they were desperate means slaves enjoyed "protection"? Hint: no. What I'm trying to say is that you cannot evaluate the condition of a group based solely on how it's treated during war, which is an exceptional time. Women not being used as cannon fodder proves nothing by itself.	/r/MensRights	01/10/13 03:06 PM
2	"Men's Centres Badly Needed In Canada, Advocates Say". What are the majority of comments? "Man up" I did address your point by trying to explain that your argument makes no sense. People are not sent to war to die, they are sent to win a battle. The Military at the time thought women couldn't fight or use a weapon, so, yes, they looked down on women. On the other hand, they were trying to protect them too. Feminist claims are as wrong as yours.	/r/MensRights	01/10/13 01:16 PM
-3	"Men's Centres Badly Needed In Canada, Advocates Say". What are the majority of comments? "Man up" You're taking a strange twist in this. The fact soldiers would die anyway does not imply they could send anyone. If they didn't believe there was a chance of victory, they wouldn't even fight to begin with. It was obvious to anyone that soliders had only a slim chance of survival once in the battlefield. And this goes to show how tragic those times must have been. It might seem to us now that those who died were "expendables" but that's an anachronic analysis. It certainly didn't look like that …	/r/MensRights	29/09/13 11:16 PM
12	"Men's Centres Badly Needed In Canada, Advocates Say". What are the majority of comments? "Man up" wouldn't a society ruled by masculinity send the feminine members to die by the millions? You're missing the point. Soliders are sent to war to win a battle, not to die. Dying is a consequence. If women are perceived as not being able to win a battle, they are not even considered as an option.	/r/MensRights	29/09/13 09:47 PM
0	So the feminists at my uni have opened up a women's only space... I really don't see any problem in a women's only space. Just chill and let them jerk their thoughts off eternally.	/r/MensRights	28/05/13 06:54 PM
1	How far are we from artificial womb technology? Wow, that's interesting. Those pics probably refer to this story, back in 1997! http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-07-20/news/9707200081_1_womb-fetuses-artificial Then I found this 2009 article about what might've gone wrong: http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/what-happened-to-the-artificial-womb-471959.html	/r/MensRights	20/05/13 02:36 AM
4	How far are we from artificial womb technology? Maybe they just aren't cost effective yet...	/r/MensRights	18/05/13 02:31 PM