guysmiley00 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Feminists continue to promote male genital mutilation. Uh, did you read your "cancer.org" link? In the past, circumcision has been suggested as a way to prevent penile cancer. This was based on studies that reported much lower penile cancer rates among circumcised men than among uncircumcised men. But in many of those studies, the protective effect of circumcision was no longer seen after factors like smegma and phimosis were taken into account. Most public health researchers believe that the risk of penile cancer is low among uncircumcised men with…	/r/MensRights	18/05/13 10:25 PM
4	MensRights, I'm back in school to be a nurse, and was confronted by this shit today That sucks. Just imagine if you had to deal with that type of shit every single day of your life. Like women do. [Citation needed.]	/r/MensRights	13/06/11 02:08 PM
2	MensRights, I'm back in school to be a nurse, and was confronted by this shit today And you're basing that on... what?	/r/MensRights	13/06/11 02:07 PM
2	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate First up - all arguments are politically motivated. Full stop. Everyone speaks from a position of self-interest - some are more aware of it than others, some temper it more than others. But it's inescapable. To be without self-interest is to thwart millions of years worth of evolution. Also, "reasonable human responses" are rarely so - without any kind of research, blindly predicting dire consequences for anything is extremely dangerous. After all, the "reasonable" response to being raped is to …	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 11:09 PM
2	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Most people seem to be understanding the law pretty easily. No, what's wrong with you is that you're refusing to recognize the difference between two distinct concepts, for what I suspect are political reasons - but I'll have a go at explaining it anyway. Say I'm a kid missing a candy bar. I suspect you stole it, because you were close by and I don't like you. I tell the teacher, but the teacher can't do anything, because there's no evidence. Neither of us gets punished, because there's no evide…	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 04:46 PM
1	Womens groups get urinal removed from hamilton eatery. DON'T YOU JUDGE ME!!	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 05:53 AM
2	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Hey, sparky, I don't have to replace your crap stats with better ones - I just have to show that they're flawed. If anything, bad statistics are worse than no statistics, because they give a false picture of what's really occurring. So, no, your original claim doesn't "stand". Go take a debating course. And why would I want to find stats showing that false accusations outnumber unreported rapes? What the fuck does that have to do with the original conversation? Prosecuting false accusers has not…	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 05:51 AM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Yeah, God forbid blogs have commentary. Everyone knows it's totally impossible to scroll past that to the article itself. Rule one, sparky - when you're in a hole, quit digging.	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 05:34 AM
1	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. Nope, sorry - if you're telling blonde jokes, you've got a good case for being designated legally retarded. They're simplistic, predictable, and mean-spirited. I don't have to sample every variety of excrement in the world to know it's not going to be tasty. Tell you what, give me your best example. If it's not utter crap, I'll rethink my position.	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 01:32 AM
1	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. We're not talking about a shirt - we're talking about a sign posted prominently in the dining room of a restaurant. And are you seriously suggesting that the message doesn't change depending on the messenger? Does a black man saying "nigger" get the same reaction as a white one? And your argument that both messages are more harmful to women is ludicrous, and shows a mindset that only values the pain of women. If a man wore a shirt saying "Women belong in the kitchen", would you say that such a g…	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 01:23 AM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Are you retarded? That's exactly the article that's both reprinted and linked to in the article.	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 12:32 AM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Considering how false rape accusers seem to universally get a slap on the wrist, if any punishment at all, I'd say making new criminal law to bring punishments for said offenses into line with those who, say, lie about kidnapping or arson is just leveling the playing field. Or do you think that false accusers for other serious crimes often walk away without penalty?	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 12:29 AM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Are you aware of the irony of defending the integrity of the word "rape" in a thread about false rape accusations? Not that you can't be against both, but at least acknowledge the elephant in the room.	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 12:21 AM
2	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Hi - welcome to adult conversation. It's "common sense" that the sun revolves around the earth - after all, it moves and we don't, right? We can see it every day. Source it or shut it.	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 12:18 AM
0	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Christ, trying to find methodological data for any of that info is like pulling teeth - there's like 5 layers of studies citing studies before you can get back to the original data. In any case, a couple of interesting tidbits - first, that the definition of rape for the NCVS includes "forced sexual intercourse including psychological coercion". Interestingly, though "psychological coercion" is mentioned 4 times in the NCVS interviewing manual, it's never defined. Certainly, one can imagine rape…	/r/MensRights	27/01/11 12:16 AM
2	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate And that's why you're retarded. Why would any rape victim use their rapist as an authoritative source for legal advice? What member of the legal system would allow a victim to believe that? Why would not prosecuting false accusers prevent rapists from saying that anyway? I don't even know where to begin with you. It's like trying to explain quantum physics to a 5-year-old.	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:40 PM
2	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate No, obviously not. Are you really so dense that you can't understand the difference between an inability to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt and actually having evidence of malicious intent on the part of the accuser? What's wrong with you?	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:37 PM
3	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Hi - you're completely ignorant about how the criminal-justice system operates. Tell me - if a murder suspect is acquitted, is the prosecutor arrested then-and-there for malicious prosecution? No - because there's a HUGE difference between being unable to prove something "beyond a reasonable doubt" and actually having evidence of malicious intent on the accuser's part. Why does this even have to be pointed out? The rest of your argument is just as stupid. Would you apply this logic to any other …	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:35 PM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Hi - did you notice that the boy who was originally facing prosecution was younger than the girl in question? No? Then how about you fuck off with your glib generalizations until you learn to read?	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:28 PM
0	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate I dunno - I get that it's an extreme comparison, but think about the repercussions. At least, as a rape victim, you get a degree of sympathy and support. It's horrible, but it ends, and you can move on to some degree. But as a falsely-accused person? That's never going to go away. You might as well be labeled as a pedophile - no matter what you do, or where you go, that's always going to follow you, and people are always going to look askance, if not be outright hostile. You're the modern equiva…	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:27 PM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate People don't usually admit to murder, either, and yet somehow we get convictions. It's called evidence, and is in abundance in those cases where false accusers have been convicted.	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:06 PM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate If we did make it the norm to go after false accusers, wouldn't every rape case that didn't end in the rapist being convicted turn into a false-accuser case? No, for the same reason that every acquittal doesn't immediately result in a criminal case for malicious prosecution. Several people have said this, and you don't seem to get it - there's a big difference between being unable to prove something and having evidence of malicious intent. And what about the impact on rape victims of having admi…	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:05 PM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate What? You've got to be kidding. Rape cases have a complainant - they have a witness built-in, so to speak. Murder cases have to rely on hearsay far more often, because many times the only person who really knows what happened is the last one who's going to admit it. Besides, look at the cases where a false accusation conviction has been obtained - they've got evidence out the ears. Witnesses. Changing stories. Inconsistent behaviour. People can and do get murder convictions on much less.	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 07:01 PM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Except if you, you know, don't execute people, like most of the democratic world. Then you can release the exonerated with at least some compensation for their ordeal. But that's another issue altogether.	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 06:57 PM
1	"It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocate Show me a case of this occurring. Show me someone who has been convicted of making a false accusation on anything but the strongest grounds. This argument is so thin it borders on the absurd. And why, exactly, might this hypothetical injustice against a rape victim, tragic as it could be, outweigh the proven injustice against numerous victims of a false rape charge? Is the pain of one person more "valuable" than the pain of another, or two, or three? No system of justice is perfect. Would you su…	/r/MensRights	26/01/11 06:55 PM
1	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. He can't prove a negative, skippy. Get cracking with your evidence.	/r/MensRights	25/01/11 05:38 PM
1	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. "Not dating them" is different from "not publicly mocking them".	/r/MensRights	25/01/11 05:37 PM
1	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. If you're hanging out with people who tell "blonde" jokes, you need to get new friends - not just because they're bigots, but because they're fucking morons. I haven't heard anyone tell a "blonde" joke since the 5th grade. Honestly, who sees a "blonde" joke as anything other than a sign of a severe lack of humour and intellect on the part of the teller?	/r/MensRights	25/01/11 05:36 PM
1	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. Do you really not understand the difference between a joke meant to deconstruct a stereotype, and one meant to reinforce it? If this restaurant had placards with "wetback" jokes, would you be as forgiving?	/r/MensRights	25/01/11 05:32 PM
0	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. You really don't see the difference between a person choosing to wear a shirt denigrating themselves, and someone publicly putting up a sign to denigrate others?	/r/MensRights	25/01/11 05:30 PM
0	I went out to dinner and this sign was at the restaurant in the center of the fireplace mantle. Then I googled it and didnt realize how ubiquitous it already was. Yes, because those calendars are tacked up in the waiting room, deliberately placed for customers to see.	/r/MensRights	25/01/11 05:26 PM
7	San Francisco man hopes to bring about ban on circumcision I'm sorry, would it really be so hard to google "circumcision" before coming in here as a self-appointed representative of all "ladies" and declaring a functional part of the male body to be "ugh... gross"? How about taking even a shred of responsibility for your own education before insulting an entire class of humanity? Would you tell black people that they should all have their hair straightened because afros are "ugh... gross"? You may have had honest intentions in your original post, but yo…	/r/MensRights	23/01/11 01:51 PM
7	San Francisco man hopes to bring about ban on circumcision You purport to speak for all women in saying that all male babies should have a piece of healthy tissue surgically removed because you think it's "gross", and you're surprised that people are angry with you? Try thinking before you open your mouth. How would you react to a man saying that all female infants should have their nipples cut off at birth because "all guys" find nipples to be "ugh... gross"?	/r/MensRights	23/01/11 01:45 PM
1	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man Yeah, that would work if I hadn't been on reddit longer with less activity. Troll away, moron.	/r/MensRights	23/01/11 03:03 AM
6	San Francisco man hopes to bring about ban on circumcision So, what other permanent physical injuries are acceptable to inflict on a infant? Earlobe extension? Ritual scarring? Tongue forking? One could always remove a few fingers or toes. And how long, exactly, is this magical period when a child can be injured without causing any lasting psychological harm? Should child-abuse laws be adjusted to account for this grace period? What evidence do you have to back this up? History is full of "religious things" that modern society would call barbaric violat…	/r/MensRights	23/01/11 02:33 AM
2	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man Well, sure you are. You just said that dating an unemployed person means you don't have "standards", indicating that you believe that such a person is intrinsically worth less than someone with a job. Lifetip - if you're going to be a bigot, at least own it.	/r/MensRights	22/01/11 05:30 PM
0	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man It'd be a lot easier to take you seriously if you could spell "poll" and "site".	/r/MensRights	19/01/11 01:53 PM
-1	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man So, you're asserting that people should be solely valued by their income?	/r/MensRights	19/01/11 01:51 PM
1	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man Yeah, people concerned about gender inequities are such whiners.	/r/MensRights	19/01/11 01:50 PM
1	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man Speaking of "spurious", you've made a whole bunch of unsupported assumptions in your argument. "Pair-bonding" is a common, but not universal, pattern of mate relationship, both currently and throughout history. Human children, while benefiting from extra investment, almost always survive into adulthood with far less resources than the theoretical maximum that could be provided by a single parent in an averagely-resourced environment. You're so short on any factual basis for your argument, it's l…	/r/MensRights	19/01/11 01:49 PM
-1	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man How does fewer men disqualifying a potential partner due to employment status somehow translate to "banging any pretty face" for you? Are you suggesting that people should only be valued for their income? If anyone's riddled with gender stereotypes around here, it's you.	/r/MensRights	19/01/11 01:25 PM
2	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man Yeah, how dare someone publish data that's inconvenient to my political beliefs?! SEXISTS!!	/r/MensRights	19/01/11 01:23 PM
2	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man Are women known for specifically dating people they find unattractive? That must be why Brad Pitt's so hard up for dates. Where's the gender inequality in being attracted to someone who's appearance demonstrates complementary genetic material? Are you saying evolution is sexist?	/r/MensRights	19/01/11 01:20 PM
0	A highschool loaded with pregnant teens. I wonder how the young men involved are doing. Life's big lessons are coming early. Well, I see someone has never read any statistics on teen sex education and beliefs.	/r/MensRights	16/01/11 03:07 AM
2	Womens groups get urinal removed from hamilton eatery. I think there's a point where "offense" becomes "social censorship". Do we really want to live in a society dictated by the tastes of the most sensitive among us?	/r/MensRights	12/01/11 12:52 AM
1	Womens groups get urinal removed from hamilton eatery. Toilets in the women's restroom? I couldn't give a crap.	/r/MensRights	12/01/11 12:50 AM
2	Womens groups get urinal removed from hamilton eatery. This sort of creeping social censorship should concern everyone who values a diverse society. I find kitschy-country restaurants offensive, but I'm not trying to get Montana's Steakhouse shuttered. I just don't go.	/r/MensRights	12/01/11 12:48 AM
2	Womens groups get urinal removed from hamilton eatery. This is either pure idiocy or the most perfect troll ever created.	/r/MensRights	12/01/11 12:47 AM
1	Womens groups get urinal removed from hamilton eatery. True - but why be offended about something you've never seen at a place you never go to? If this were a bunch of people complaining about, say, an imagine of Jesus in a video at the Smithsonian, people who wouldn't go to the museum if you paid them, they'd be castigated by thinking folk, and rightly so. But now, because a few groups claiming to speak for all women have decided that only a woman's mouth can have red lips, and that no-one is allowed to enjoy "watersports" because it's "degrading",…	/r/MensRights	12/01/11 12:45 AM
1	Why Chinese Mothers are Superior - response from a Chinese daughter If "Chinese" parenting is so successful, why's China such a shithole?	/r/MensRights	11/01/11 12:41 PM
1	Even 'I’m sorry' Is Too Much to Give a Man Falsely acused of Rape IANAL, but there's most definitely law about manipulating others to commit crimes - it's called incitement or conspiracy, depending on the situation. Lying about someone raping you could fall squarely under either definition, in my opinion.	/r/MensRights	22/12/10 08:26 PM
2	Bradly Manning is cruelly being held in solitary lockdown without being convicted of anything ... no wait that was a 14 year old boy in Lansing Michigan. Bonus: The Michigan ACLU was petitioned, but they didn't lift a finger to help. I really can't see where you're getting this from. Much of the ACLU's work in recent years has been in defense of the rights to privacy and protection from government abuse in law-enforcement scenarios, work that statistically is either gender-neutral or more beneficial towards men. To say that "they did jack for men and boys" seems to indicate a complete ignorance of the work done by the ACLU.	/r/MensRights	21/12/10 07:08 PM
1	Bradly Manning is cruelly being held in solitary lockdown without being convicted of anything ... no wait that was a 14 year old boy in Lansing Michigan. Bonus: The Michigan ACLU was petitioned, but they didn't lift a finger to help. OP might want to note that the ACLU is a private organization, receiving no funding from the government, and hence is exponentially dwarfed by the governmental apparatus it seeks to scrutinize (National ACLU revenues for 2004 were just over $85.5 million, compared to the $29.2 billion 2011 budget for the federal DOJ alone). Before you complain about what the ACLU has and hasn't done, I suggest you ask yourself how much money you have contributed to the effort.	/r/MensRights	20/12/10 06:23 PM
1	If women want to be equal in all things, why are they not required to sign up for the selective service? Hi, Canadian here, and speaking as someone who went through basic training and other courses with a coed unit, I can't really see where you're coming from here. Women can be just as untidy as men, and in any case basic discipline should keep disorder from becoming chaos. You've got a pretty weird perspective on gender if you think having a female come live in an all-male environment creates some massive culture shock - it happens every day in apartments and rooming houses across America. From th…	/r/MensRights	16/12/10 06:59 AM
1	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception "Thought crime" means making thoughts criminal, and is generally agreed upon as being a "very bad thing", as thoughts harm no-one and the price for criminalizing thought is repression of the worse sort (the classic example being 1984 or the actions of the political arms of the Soviets, the Nazis or the governments of revolutionary France). Expression of that thought is also covered in the definition of "thought crime". For example, arresting someone for writing a story about assassinating the US…	/r/MensRights	17/10/10 11:59 PM
1	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception Pointing out that nearly half the states in America consider a 16-year-old and a 10-year-old identically under age-of-consent laws is obtuse? If you don't like reality, don't blame me for it. And I've seen lots of women in playgrounds taking pictures - women are famous for wanting to show you the latest 10 000 pictures they've taken of their child prodigy. You really think that just because there are fewer men than women around children in play areas, the men should be treated with suspicion? Ar…	/r/MensRights	17/10/10 11:31 PM
0	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception Edit response - maybe some day you'll learn that, since you are responsible for the facts you present as correct in creating an argument, you should really vet the sources you pull them from. Until then, have fun looking like a complete ass.	/r/MensRights	17/10/10 11:23 PM
2	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception You're really going to quote the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality as a reliable source? Really? And where are you getting this "keynote speakers at Pedo-palooza" from? The source for that allegation in the Wiki article is Anna C. Salter, the author of a book attacking Rind et. al. - a book published outside academia, and therefore outside peer review. Salter was also deeply involved in the "false memories" scandal of the late '80s, attacking those who asserted that th…	/r/MensRights	22/09/10 04:59 AM
3	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception I live in a house. The fact that I sometimes leave that house doesn't change that. You may find, in life, that not everyone always feels they owe you an explanation. This does not give you a free pass for assault.	/r/MensRights	22/09/10 03:58 AM
4	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception You're a great example of exactly why we need to be so careful in these areas. For all you know, that man was taking pictures of the swimming pool itself, or was getting photos to go with one of those "end-of-summer" fluff pieces local media are so fond of. You could very well have killed a man who was just doing his job. Aren't you proud?	/r/MensRights	22/09/10 03:19 AM
2	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception "But taking pictures of other people's children and distributing them "for other pedophiles to delight in" is illegal and people have been prosecuted for this." Legality aside, I see this sort of law as a very bad idea. If the internet has taught us anything, it is that everything is a turn on to someone, somewhere. Moreover, it moves into that more traditional area of controversial "pornography" law - how can you regulate the reaction of a viewer to an image? If a parent takes a picture of a ch…	/r/MensRights	22/09/10 03:16 AM
3	Dangerous pedophile hunter vigilantes threaten harmless pedophile for his thought crimes. \| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception Aren't 16-year-olds and 10-year-olds treated the same under most pornography laws? Are they not both minors in many jurisdictions? I think it's actually quite a good example, given the attention directed towards underage characters and actors by adult women in the Twilight series. I certainly haven't heard anyone complaining about the pedophilic aspects of that phenomenon, have you?	/r/MensRights	22/09/10 03:01 AM
17	Maran: Why I falsely accused my father of incest. (after 1980s feminist-inspired campaign to expose molestation) What a horrible person is this Maran woman. Everything she says or writes drips with a slimy effort to avoid any sort of personal accountability. It was the culture, it was my girlfriend - what a load of bollocks. She wanted to be a victim then, and she wants to be a victim now - because "victims" never have to face the terrifying power of running their own lives. While I'm certainly aware of the remarkable adaptability of the human mind, and the incredible delusions and fantasies that can resul…	/r/MensRights	22/09/10 12:16 AM