TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

guytoronto Archive

View 2 posts and 61 comments by guytoronto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

My experience is different. You have to be humble, and want the system to treat your children fairly. And I've had more success self representing.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:00 AM
17

I'm in a custody battle right now. You have to know how to play the game. If you are ignorant and act entitled, you are going to have a bad time in front of a family law judge.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:05 PM
–

Guess what...cohabitating can often mean common law marriage, and assets can still be split 50/50.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:00 PM
–

Carrying people from a burning building is only one aspect of the job, and not every firefighter actually does this. It is attitudes like yours that gives feminists their ammunition.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:39 PM
–

There needs to be a correlation between the standards and prevention of deaths. Are firefighters dying because they aren't "strong" or "tough" enough? Are they dying because they didn't have enough endurance? Or are they dying because it's a damn dangerous job, and no matter how strong or tough you are, shit happens like a floor or ceiling collapses, a fuel tank explodes, the fire spreads unpredictably. It's a very simplistic argument "We need the biggest, strongest, toughest" for the job. It's …
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:46 PM
–

As long as they can justify the standards, then I have no problem with them.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:36 PM
4

You are correct. /u/AGoodWordForOldGil 's post is incredibly sexist. It's a 1950s mentality. Ability to stay focused while stressed and pressured? How incredibly ignorant.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:35 PM
–

I want the department to show there is an actual requirement for the standards, and that they aren't set arbitrarily high for no legitimate reason.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:34 AM
0

Actually, this is a good thing. The state should always bring charges. It shouldn't be the prosecutors decision to determine innocence or guilt. That's the role of a judge and/or jury. In this case, the judge should have dismissed the case.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:12 AM
3

It's not his fucking fault she is in a nursing home. It's not about fault. He's been married to her for 30+ years. If he loved her and could afford it he would support her. Should he be punished because he doesn't want to? It's not about punishment. It's about the fact they were married 30+ years, and SOMEBODY has to take care of her. He made that commitment a long time ago. The U.S. government is so broken, it is not willing to pay to support human life (like most other civilized nations), so i…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:17 AM
3

You should want to be better than that, not sink to their levels.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:14 AM
5

False. The reason U.S. healthcare is so expensive is because your governments don't value adult human life, men AND women.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:13 AM
–

Did any of you actually read the entire article? Couple is married. Woman goes into nursing home which costs A LOT. Eats through her entire savings. Husband files for divorce. Definitely not to protect his financial assets winkwinknudgenudge*. Judge sees through his b.s. and orders him to continue supporting the woman. You want to be angry? Be angry at the broken social system that requires $6000/month from a dying woman's pocket to support her. If you think it's fair and just that a man can ski…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 11:53 PM
1

Correct. Predominantly female environments have their own issues. That's why it's important to have a good balance.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 09:58 PM
–

Yes I have. I've also been in all-male environments and the testosterone, male-macho bullshit just escalates out of control.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 09:14 PM
–

I definitely would not. Women more often than not bring some civility to a predominantly male environment.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 06:04 PM
–

In all honesty, if a teacher did that to either my son or my daughter, and the justice system let them off with a slap on the wrist (which is essentially what she got), I would hunt him or her down and make sure he or she could never harm another child ever again.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:42 AM
1

That first sentence/paragraph is horrible.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:06 PM
1

Now multiply that by every single woman, and it adds up. Plus factor in the fact that you can fight two or three urinals into the space of one toilet, and the problem compounds.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:24 AM
0

That's actually stupidly ignorant.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:47 PM
1

If you don't understand why it takes women longer to urinate then men, you need an education in basic biology.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:46 PM
–

Actually, this makes sense since men can go to the washroom a lot faster than women. Have you ever been to a movie theatre or sporting event? The lineup for the ladies room is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:53 AM
–

Almost everyone who gets divorced has this type of problem. [citation needed]
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:19 AM
–

Millions of people get married. The majority never have these types of problems. I'm happily married, with two kids. I force my wife to work. I tell her being a stay-at-home mom was fine when the kids were small, but not that they are in school, she has to work and upgrade her skills. Neither of us makes much money, so even if we split, there isn't a lot of money or assets to argue over.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 07:57 PM
16

Dude, it's the Salvation Army. They demonize all people. Just read their tenets.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:49 AM
–

RTFA. You want to know why some feminists hate MRAs? Because people like you say shit like this without even knowing what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:58 AM
-2

Nope. Belief without supporting evidence is detrimental to society.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:05 AM
3

In our home, the seat is always put down, full lid and all. Why? Cats, kids, and stuff on shelves above the toilet.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 09:11 AM
0

Dad travelling alone with baby seems to think he is being silently judged by others based on a few weird looks he gets.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:04 AM
–

Why? It's a private interaction. Family, friends, coworkers, employers will have no knowledge of it. What is the issue?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:11 PM
2

You should consider changing books then. Try a dictionary.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:28 PM
-14

I wouldn't refuse. DNA testing has advanced significantly, and is a very reliable identification tool. Eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable. Hand writing analysis is not reliable. Low-res video, audio are subject to interpretation. But DNA is very useful in EXCLUDING suspects, and narrowing the focus of an investigation. How many false convictions have we seen overturned die to modern DNA testing?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:01 AM
-4

Yes, but some people seem to feel that it is overreaching of the government to do this. IMO it's not.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:55 AM
–

No, businesses should not be allowed to do business as they please. I guarantee you no business enjoys paying taxes. Oh, that's different? I guarantee you no business enjoys following all the health and safety regulations. Oh, that's different? Employee pay, employee safety. Lots and lots of regulations . So no, businesses can't just live by their own rules. But they can decide who they want to do business with? Tell that to any black person alive prior to the 60s. In the U.S. it took a major la…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:03 AM
–

I think you are overreacting a bit.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:44 AM
–

Solution: Flood the system with anonymous complaints aimed at Yale administrative staff.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:43 AM
–

Hmmm... Maybe they'll start questioning more aspects of their religion as well. They may discover the foundation of their belief is a huge frickin' myth.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:55 PM
1

That title is painful to read. I actually had to open the article to understand what you were trying to say.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:52 PM
-7

Gender does not mean sex. Sex refers the biological parts (i.e. male/female genitalia). Gender refers to the social construct (masculine, feminine).
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:44 AM
1

It would be statutory rape if they had sex, the news bulletin makes no mention thereof. It's a short news video. A quick google search turns up this: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/Dumped-by-Facebook-boyfriend-14-year-old-schoolgirl-hangs-self/articleshow/25338418.cms "Manoj then invited her to his bachelor pad in Nandini Layout, and when Shikha visited him, forced her into a physical relationship." Also: this concerns Bangladesh, not India. You may want to go back and watch i…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:54 PM
0

One is a city, one is a country, but come on! You expect people to actually read and comprehend? OP probably didn't even realize that because of her age, it was statutory rape under Indian law.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:47 PM
-1

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:44 PM
1

Considering that in this case, girl@14, man@21, India age of consent@18, then this is most definitely rape. Rape in India is a huge problem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/Dumped-by-Facebook-boyfriend-14-year-old-schoolgirl-hangs-self/articleshow/25338418.cms "Manoj then invited her to his bachelor pad in Nandini Layout, and when Shikha visited him, forced her into a physical relationship."
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:42 PM
4

You're right. A threat of no food is stupid. Expecting a 4yo child to make some kind of rational decision is also stupid.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 12:51 PM
-5

While the father is not 'wholly' incapable, his option of "something else or nothing", and then following through on the "nothing" is just bad form, especially for a dad. If you don't agree with McDonald's, take the kid to a better restaurant, but him something decent, and put it in front of the kid. If he doesn't eat it, send it home with him in a doggie bag. Seriously, how did he expect the mother to react having her kid returned hungry? EDIT: wow, it's amazing the number is people who don't u…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 03:58 AM
1

I can understand the desire to regulate the industry, but there should definitely be a grandfather clause. A 50yo barber shouldn't be required to go back to school. Let him live out his days doing what he does.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:17 PM
3

Hide. Delete your Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, whatever. Change your phone number if she has it. If you think she may have your address, consider moving if that's a viable option. Avoid any possible communication with her until well after the statue of limitations. I would say another 10 years minimum. If you get looped into paternity payments, you are completely screwed.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:12 AM
3

You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:08 AM
–

I had a friend who's girlfriend pulled this shit. He was out of country on a job, and she told him she was preg. Even sent him a scan of the ultrasound. Through some Sherlock Holmes work, he figured she was lying about it. The ultrasound belonged to somebody else. They had a big argument over the phone. Then she "went for a walk in the park, got mugged, got kicked in the stomach a few times, and had a miscarriage". He dumped her lying ass.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:55 AM
7

So the sisters make their claim, later recant, then claim it again. They don't go to police with their accusations. They send emails to a bunch of family and friends about their accusations. The uncle sues for defamation, and ONLY then do the sisters pursue charges. Ya, that doesn't seem fishy at all. Shame on the sisters.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:10 AM
-7

The amount of hate spewing from people here towards this woman is pathetic and saddening. It's no wonder so many others have issues with some of MRAs here. She had her life destroyed as well, just to a lesser degree.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:20 PM
–

Every human deserves a basic level of respect. It doesn't matter how much of a douche-nozzle ass-wipe they actually are. You should still extend a basic level of respect and courtesy. It's how we make a better society.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:24 PM
12

"any advice?" Yes. Stop lying for sympathy. You posted the same story over here > http://www.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch/comments/1c8h7g/my_life_is_over/ Posted 19 hours ago with different details. Douchebag.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:03 PM
0

Incorrect. Rape occurs when something sexual is forced on somebody else against their will or consent. Sex without a condom? If it was agreed that a condom be used, then the violation is forcing unprotected sex on someone against their consent. To your original question, you would need to claim that consent is strictly "unprotected sexual intercourse for the purpose of making a baby" and nothing more, and that any variant of that is a violation, and therefore rape. That is a huge stretch. It is …
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:16 AM
-2

That is a completely different situation from the original question. One involves a form of violation (not wearing a condom when requested to do so). The other involves no violation.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:59 AM
-1

My opinion of that case is irrelevant to the original question.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:42 AM
3

Uh, no. This is one of the most inane arguing points ever. This isn't even close to the loosest definitions of rape. Deceit? Sure.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:37 AM
–

This is actually a good thing. This shows very clearly how easy it is for a woman to lie about something as serious as rape AND be so convincing that others genuinely feel sorry for her and her pain and suffering. Should she be allowed to keep the money? Absolutely. It's a contest, and she did what it took to win. The one thing she needs to keep in mind though is that her actions can have serious consequences. Tomorrow she could be gang-raped by the members of an Al Qaeda sleeper cell, and nobod…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:57 PM
–

Wow. Two years? I've been addressing these kinds of issues in real life for the past eight years. I used to work on a radio talk show which had segments dedicated to men's rights issues. Silly posts like this do nothing to advance the issues. They just come across as whining from immature emos.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 11:47 AM
–

You are clueless. You are looking for something to complain about. One of the problems with MensRights is the number of people like you who take ANY little thing like this and try to turn it into an "it's an attack on men" issue. Grow up.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 11:07 AM
–

At this rate I predict the entire planet will be subscribed by December 21 - even those without computers.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 03:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter