TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gvs77 Archive

View 6 posts and 332 comments by gvs77 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

I don't even know what that is (and I don't care)
/r/MensRights26/07/26 07:24 AM
4

So, another singer can ask all black women to stand in the back from now on and point at this as a precedent. Rules should work all ways.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 07:23 AM
4

No they are not in the same category. Scientifically they are women but trans men is accurate and avoids confusion. CIS men is redundant. Alphabet mafia is very accurate, cancelling everyone who not only disagrees but who doesn't enthusiastically commit to their believe. I'm a libertarian, I don't interfere with what adults do to themselves, but that isn't acceptable.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 05:02 PM
11

I'm prefixing the deviation form normal only. So trans woman/man vs man/woman. But the alphabet mafia disagrees
/r/MensRights30/06/26 09:30 AM
8

"Oh, no, they've got a black one-eyed lesbian transgender woman in a wheelchair, we've lost!" I want the flying cars I was promised as a kid!
/r/MensRights30/06/26 05:49 AM
3

They formalized minority bingo!?
/r/MensRights30/06/26 05:39 AM
7

I hadn't looked at it thia way. It felt like we went from trans man/woman to having man/woman be trans so we need to prefix the real deal.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 05:35 AM
5

100℅ correct
/r/MensRights30/06/26 05:34 AM
12

When will the western people wake up and realize Zelensky cancelled the elections because the kidnappings and torture of men, his own people, mean he would not win again. It took a lot of money and months of planning to get my (steph)son out safely after he was violently taken by the army.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 06:42 AM
38

They brainstormed for hours how to make hiring women even less attractive. They succeeded
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:38 PM
9

We work less, not more, then our grandparents who did manage to meet on social events.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 08:46 PM
1

Offensive is in the eye of the beholder. It is a very reasonable assumption to make and if you are in some minority, no need to have a fit over that. I'm pushing 50 and I've known one married same sex couple in my life (IRL).
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:29 AM
1

Yeah, but an assumption that is correct 99ish % of the time is pretty reasonable to make
/r/MensRights01/04/26 03:13 PM
-1

Yeah, most are...
/r/MensRights29/03/26 08:54 PM
-4

It says how my wife fixed. Making it reasonable to assume the husband posted it.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 09:14 AM
1

Do I want to know what ableism is?
/r/MensRights25/08/25 10:03 AM
11

Look, I found the worst possible men on the planet, now we extrapolate that to guilt all other men. Not enough brain cells to know that if we apply the same method to women, the results would be equally bad (in different ways). They'd have a fit if I analyzed OnlyFans women to conclude all women where narcissistic, self centered who're that we should all run from. Neither position is true.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 08:30 AM
2

If the gender pay gap can be accounted for by choices like profession and hours worked, there is no gender based gap. Given that, what exactly are women asking for that they currently do not have (being paid the same in exactly the same circumstances)?
/r/MensRights27/11/24 02:38 PM
1

in what way?
/r/MensRights26/11/24 09:19 AM
3

Indeed, if there is a real wage gap, it's at the disadvantage of men through female privileges because of this lie
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:49 PM
13

The claim of his GF demonstrates that is false. She tells him she's working for free from that point on, feminists claim women get payed less while they actually work less. Wnat to earn more, work more and choose jobs that pay well. Wat feminists are asking for is that women get payed as much as men for less work or for less demanding jobs. which is privileges over equality.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:17 PM
31

There is a wage gap between different jobs, there is a wage gap between those who work more hours then others. There is no wage gap based on sex, that part is a lie. A man working parttime as a teacher does not outearn his female coworkers in the same situation.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 04:58 PM
76

The pay gap is a LIE, is has been disproven time and time again. When you account for hours worked and actual jobs, there is no paygap. Your GF seems to buy in to the man hating culture, proceed careful
/r/MensRights22/11/24 10:32 AM
1

Get a lawyer today, keep it a secret. Only communicate written and where not possible record video and audio. Good luck
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:47 PM
8

What concrete laws are the proposing in that respect and how does it take away from women's rights? Fascism is government and private companies banding together to suppress people. Not unlike communism. How that serves men, who die first in any conflict, is beyond me.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 07:14 PM
15

My personal experience is Europa as the West, I'd include at least the US as well. The lady asking the question did not specify what she considers extreme men's rights so hard to answer. I have not seen many demands for anything like that
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:32 PM
35

Most feminists who whine and complain about oppression live in the west, a place where they hold preferential treatment and have all rights men do without some of the obilgations men do have
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:17 PM
2

In general, feminists are not in favor of equal rights but privileges and equality of outcome. Both are fundamentally unfair. Today, there isn't a legal right in the west that women don't have and men do, but the reverse is true. Men can be drafted, forced into service etc. Don't propagate lies such as the wage gap (it has been disproven over and over again), don't demonize men and argue for equality of opportunity over outcome
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:15 PM
15

You are not forced to do anything. There is pressure from society to do so, which you can ignore without any harm coming to you
/r/MensRights20/03/24 12:59 PM
14

One, he does not mention men. Two, he is right and wrong at the same time. I live in Belgium and we also have government mandated pensions. The thing with those is that they are a scam. Deposit your pension money in an investment account during your working years, have it collect interests over your life and you can retire at 65 IF YOU WANT. Now, if you die at 66, the government makes a huge profit and you kids never see anything from the stolen loot.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 10:17 AM
7

Yeah, far-right is authoritarian (as is the entire left). Libertarian is the opposite of authoritarian
/r/MensRights18/01/24 02:15 PM
4

Easy, feminism is not promoting equality, it wants privileges for women. Take the wage gap, that can be easily explained by the amount of hours worked by women and chosen profession. Hence feminists want women to be paid more per hour to close a gap in the length of their workweek. Which means the want men to work more hours for the same job. Privileges for one class come at a cost of rights of the rest, so therefor men's rights are at odds with female privileges.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 03:00 PM
23

If you are in a committed relationship and neither of you had this at the start, you can do whatever you want between the both of you without risk. Despite all bullshit we've been fed, hookup culture is dangerous (not just from a health perspective, paternity is another one)
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:41 PM
21

I think woman who let men raise kids thinking those kids are theirs should be put in jail.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 03:23 PM
10

Oh, I haven't even heard that one! Precious. Nobody can be born this stupid, it requires years of practice and dedication to achieve that level.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 03:22 PM
5

Mandatory, well if a man wants to have such a test before accepting a child is his, yes. The ONLY reason a woman would oppose that is if she knew or suspects that the child is not who she wants to collect money from.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 03:21 PM
7

There are, more then you would think.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 11:35 AM
1

There is a lot of fallout for this, but you did absolutely nothing wrong. Playing with her hair after asking her on the fourth date is really slow. This is bullshit. She was probably milking you for free stuff (you payed for the movie?)
/r/MensRights28/06/23 03:40 PM
1

What!? Hell no (father of 4 boys, been doing that by myself for about 18 years now)
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:03 AM
1

Neither can, because they just look like the opposite sex, they are in fact their own biological sex, hence they will never understand
/r/MensRights21/06/23 01:09 PM
3

Nope, I am just as sure men can't become women as I am sure women can't become men and a dog can't become a cat.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 08:29 PM
7

b and they know it. 90% of the women go after 10% of them men and rather share those.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 11:48 AM
2

Here is my take. Don't have sex with women you are not willing to commit in a relationship with. Don't have him pick up random crazy chicks in bars either. Either find a good woman to start something with or wait. The risk is terms of diseases as well as unwanted pregnancies combined with false rape charges etc are not worth it.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 11:47 AM
1

Yes, it wasn't clear on my mobile app...
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:04 AM
1

At face value, this is correct. It explicitly mentions female victims. What it implies but does not state is that men tend to be rapist, which is not the case at all. But that's not explicitly stated. I'd ignore it therefore.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:59 AM
1

You don't have to search for anything. Men as a whole cannot be oppressed, neither can women BTW. Groups of men have always been oppresses, as much as groups of women have always been oppressed. Feminists will hide behind having no voting rights, when most of history, men in general did not have them either. Men can be forced to fight in pointless wars etc. So I land at this conclusion, people without power can and will be oppressed by people with power. The only thing that varies is the degree …
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:49 AM
3

They did not withdraw consent they never gave in the first place. If I blindfold a partner and someone else penetrates her but she didn't feel it, was that OK. I don't think so.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:06 PM
10

Lying about your biological sex and penetrating them with an object pretending it's part of your body is not a list of things during sex.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:35 PM
5

Consent to insert a real body part, not penetrate with a toy. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:57 PM
4

Thank you. But, I managed to get my kids safe from her. So I did get what I wanted most.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:59 PM
6

I'm a single fulltime dad of 4 as well. Haven't seen a cent in the two years we've been apart and I doubt I ever will.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:52 PM
3

Oh, one other thing. Record every interaction with her. Communicate only written.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:39 PM
4

Get a lawyer, do it right now.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:37 PM
2

I feel for you man. Also going through a divorce but I have my kids almost always with me. So one word of advice from experience, but I live in another country, call your lawyer immediately.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 03:39 PM
1

Yes, but it is totally worth it. Be the best version of you.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 12:36 PM
3

Belgium has a default donation. You have to go to City Hall and do quite some paperwork to reverse it, which few people do (or know)
/r/MensRights22/01/20 07:16 AM
3

You know what you should do right? Change jobs and don't see him again. Anything less is playing with fire. And next time this happens, do that without telling your husband.
/r/RedPillWomen08/12/19 03:24 PM
8

You read the rational male, didn't you? Good, it's one of the bigger truth bombs I've eer seen in my life
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:07 PM
2

Men are being told they are fighting for women and children while they indeed fight for special interests and banking cartels that profit of wars by financing both sides. Those are not 'other men', there an elite class made up of both men and women. I say this as the grandson of a decorated soldier who defended my home country against the german invasion in WW2. I was quite pissed to find out many things in those wars that devastated my bloodline where lies and propaganda and there were parasite…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:57 AM
10

Yeah, those are the reasons. Not that feminism is putting men of relationships with women because of the potential cost and harm to them.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:19 PM
4

File a police report, try to collect proof and leave her today.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:41 PM
5

We need to define standards for rape. As bad as this behavior is, there has to be an element of force for rape. That standard should apply to men and women.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:55 AM
1

As far as I know, if you can prove a child is not yours you get out of jail free in Belgium.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:36 PM
1

This part is important: A challenge to the presumed legal fatherhood can be started: by the mother, within one year of the birth; by the legal father, within one year of discovering they are not the biological father; by the biological father, within one year of discovering they are the biological father; So you can prove the kid is not yours, you're free from support extortion.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 08:52 PM
1

I understand and that sucks. But in this case there's proof that he isn't the father and putting up with that is way worse.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:40 PM
2

To honest, I'd still divorce and pay child support since there are no other children involved. Or leave the country. Anything but accept that situation.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:38 PM
1

Belgium
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:36 PM
2

I'm not American. I suppose he can prove that the child is not his. So there should be no child support. But even so, staying won't make that better either.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:07 PM
14

D I V O R C E
/r/MensRights16/07/18 11:17 AM
2

I'm sorry if it sounded like that. I never doubted that women can't rape men and in fact female teachers rape male students at least as much as the reverse. I simply approached it cautiously as to not dilute actual cases of rape as women are doing now. The same standard should apply and it should be reasonable.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:29 PM
1

Yeah. Clearly rape and probably quite common.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:48 PM
3

Sorry for you and yes, that clearly is rape. I wasn't saying women can't rape men, but I was curious about the many ways.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:47 PM
3

Ok. But that isn't rape for either sex.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:45 PM
10

What are those ways (honest question)?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:28 PM
8

They feed you a narrative. Public school is propaganda.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:07 PM
14

Because you had to own land of a certain worth to vote. Which excluded a lot of men.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:00 PM
18

Oh no. You are using facts against feminists. That's not allowed. Only female feelings are admissable.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 03:59 PM
3

I would not recommend divorce when there are kids involved unless there is little other option, but as you are already in the process, there's nothing stopping you to go MGTOW from now on. It's fathers who stay with their wives who can't even if they want to.
/r/MGTOW22/06/18 01:16 PM
1

The thing is, she probably won't find anyone to settle down with, let alone that the available time frame will still include kids. Then she'll blame it on men, but who cares.
/r/MGTOW22/06/18 01:07 PM
1

Honestly, a lot of what is being said in this sub is based in truth. But I doubt all or most moms would side with a woman that cheats on their son. I'm pretty sure my wife would line up with me to do nasty things to such a woman if this happened to our sons. Not saying no woman would react like this, a lot may do that, but I would be very surprised to see this as the norm (at least where I live, even though feminists can get away with murder)
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 12:52 PM
1

Adding insult to injury, she's a liberal (classic liberal) who introduced a tax on fat and sugar. That one must have personally hit her bad.
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 02:17 PM
1

One of the reasons I took this on, and it's a huge challenge, is that I have 4 sons... I can only imagine how much worse this insanity will be by the time they have grown up.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:11 PM
2

I started a site to try some activism a couple of years ago. It's at www.mannenrechten.be, have gotten a little bit of press attention so far but quite small. Belgium is doomed.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:24 PM
23

It statutory rape I think. Stationary rape involves dirty things with paper :-)
/r/MensRights01/03/18 03:46 PM
1

The thing is that science can only determine at which point something is likely in a certain state, like being able to survive outside the womb. The entire discussion is however based on morality (murder of an adult is also not a scientific matter, but a moral one). There's actually no scientific problem with any murder at all, only morality is involved. Now, what you call a foetus is a separate human being that up to a certain point depends on it's mother's body to survive. There will be other …
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:33 PM
73

I call us free range slaves for a reason. So I understand you fully.
/r/MGTOW25/02/18 11:55 AM
18

These people are beyond braindead. I hope they keep themselves out of the human gene pool, we'd all be better off.
/r/MGTOW25/02/18 11:53 AM
1

I understand that. But that line is arbitrary. Puberty is also a measurable barrier, yet you can't kill kids before they enter it (and some old cultures did exactly that).
/r/MensRights24/02/18 02:39 PM
1

Living outside the womb is not a requirement to be a human being. In fact, should a doctor harm a foetus during an operation, he's liable for damages.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:46 PM
2

It's not. Just pointing out that age limits on killing your child are arbitrary.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:44 PM
2

Hell no. I'm saying that killing children is as wrong at any age. I think 100% that abortion is murder.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:41 PM
2

Boys aren't broken. Society is. Trying to fix boys by turning them into women is what created the problem, it is not the solution.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:17 PM
5

Your opinion on something doesn't change reality. You are killing what is even scientifically a human being. You can place arbitrary limits to what age you can kill them, the Romans thought kids where only full people at the age of 12 and were ok with parents killing them before. Your arguments are quite the same. But I also want to be clear that if mothers can't kill their children, fathers have to accept responsibility. With the latter comes the right to full access to their children.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:51 PM
14

Circumcision for medical reasons is very different from mutulating healthy boys. It's the difference between amputating your leg because you die otherwise vs just for fun.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:43 PM
3

Both the man and woman did something they knew could result in pregnancy. Killing the child is a sick option.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:34 PM
13

She only realized this year that 36 is old for starting families? And she's an attorney?
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 07:28 AM
12

Not the opposite, a secure attachment and breastfeeding with the mother is a requirement, but indeed, fathters play a unique role and children who don't have them end up badly. Look at the statistics for fatherlesness in the prison population, it is mindblowing!
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 01:08 PM
16

Not in my country (Belgium). In The UK, a group has a 20k bounty if you find such a law there.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:00 PM
5

I know very few women who are happy, despite having it easier. I do know lots of men that are happy or relatively so despite facing great difficulties.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 05:27 PM
18

A lot of men do look stressed.... but have you looked at feminists? Yelling, screaming, throwing tantrums. They're constantly angry and unhappy, yet they can't tell you why. They live they lives they think they want only to find out that they missed out on what they really wanted when it is too late. It's a practical implementation of karma.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 03:19 PM
2

Troll! But even if you are MGTOW, those strong, independent feminists still chase you for support because they can't seem to make it on their own.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 05:24 PM
7

And later the editors whine and complain if men stop buying it. Every men should refuse to buy that tag or hand in their balls at the exit.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 05:17 PM
2

And the liberal crowd hits a new low, it was quite an effort since they hit rock bottom years ago.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 08:54 AM
1

No, they want all the benefits men have by for example working more without actually doing the same things, and especially without being accountable.
/r/MGTOW05/02/18 09:16 AM
86

Feminists should be happy if you treat them as equals. Somehow, they're never happy.
/r/MGTOW04/02/18 10:15 AM
3

The article misses the entire point. It talks about the stereotype that men can't control themselves around women, and that proposition is insulting. But it fails to see the simple fact that the #MooToo backlash isn't us being afraid of our behavior, it's our exposure to false allegations and the lack of innocent until proven guilty' for men that triggers this and it is entirely proportional to the threat.
/r/MGTOW03/02/18 07:48 AM
5

What an idiot
/r/MGTOW24/01/18 09:40 AM
2

Indeed. It's self delusion.
/r/MGTOW20/01/18 10:07 AM
1

A man risks raising another man's kids when women are promiscuous. A woman does not take any such risk. Hence this behavior is treated differently because it is different. So, you can go off and do whatever you want but sensible guys won't consider you for a serious relationship. Which biologically makes sense. Feel free to disagree and/or to be a slut, I don't care as I have nor want any envolvement with you.
/r/MGTOW19/01/18 11:02 PM
2

You can do whatever you want but other people can call your behavior whatever they want. Freedom cuts both ways and you don't seem to like that.
/r/MGTOW19/01/18 10:39 PM
22

She is setting things up so if 99.9999% swiped left it is because /they/ are fat (or balding). Not because she's morbidly obese. Clever
/r/MGTOW19/01/18 10:30 PM
4

Indeed. And if she could carry a gun, she'd be safer off. Criminals don't seem to mind buying them illegally.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:19 PM
9

Why is society sugar coating prostitution? They are not sugar babes or whatever other name is in fashion, they are prostitutes.
/r/MGTOW30/12/17 06:55 PM
1

Bullshit. What kind of a POS dad abuses his kid like that. Title is very misleading,he belongs in jail.
/r/MGTOW29/12/17 04:13 PM
21

He said with half a brain, feminist men had every last braincell removed.
/r/MGTOW28/12/17 08:19 PM
1

That summarizes politicians.
/r/MGTOW21/12/17 11:39 AM
1

Given that she is from the liberal party (not in the US sense of the word, they promise more economic liberty, lower taxes and less government), those taxes are against everything the party promises. The weird part is that she's one of the most popular politicians in Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium). I don't understand people.
/r/MGTOW21/12/17 09:36 AM
6

I'll top that, she's a medical doctor. And one of here accomplishments as minister was the introduction of a tax on sugar and fat...
/r/MGTOW20/12/17 04:46 PM
11

AFAIK (I live in Belgium), she does not have a thyroid problem
/r/MGTOW20/12/17 04:38 PM
1

Feminism was started by social engineers, and both the nuclear as well as the extended family made that difficult. Feminism was one of the tools used to break that up. It servers both that purposes as well as helping to bring the population down. We would need 2.3 kids per woman to keep the population steady, most western countries are at or below 1.3, so a rapid decline will start soon.
/r/MGTOW19/12/17 03:11 PM
1

Oh, I fully agree with that. Rape has been hollowed out and the victims of actual rape (as in being physically forced) will loose. But feminists don't care about that, everything is justified to further their political agenda.
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 09:28 PM
1

True if she was asking him to act on her claims, but she was just telling her story. I understand him not believing her but as I commented earlier there's a line between disbelief and his actions.
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 09:25 PM
3

There is a reaction in between baby talking and submitting a private conversation that wasn't an accusation to himself on social media.
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 07:07 PM
31

Not every rape allegation is false, neither is every one true. Disbelieving all rape allegations is as bad as believing them by default. There's something like innocent until proven guilty and proof. But saying all rape claims are fake is as insane as the reverse and doesn't do MGTOW any favors.
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 11:18 AM
5

That was an amazing parody piece. The colored trans sex worker had me almost rolling on the ground laughing.
/r/MGTOW12/12/17 10:57 PM
-1

Again, clearly assault and she is at fault entirely. But rape is a step further and im my view requires being overpowered.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:24 AM
1

you were sexually assaulted by the first christian lady. The second incident is quite different, I have a hard time believing that a drunk girl could have gotten onto you and got your pants off while you were using force to stop her. Was she a body builder or black belt in karate
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:54 AM
2

Stop paying for her shit.
/r/MGTOW27/11/17 11:25 AM
86

The commenters fail to point out that she agreed and went back on her promise. Not a good start for a marriage. That alone justifies his decision, add to that that she outsourced her mind to her crazy coworkers.
/r/MGTOW25/11/17 09:54 PM
10

Are you an undercover feminist with a new plan to remove our genitals ?
/r/MGTOW24/11/17 09:51 PM
2

Ghost her. Don't do tactics, don't play games.. And don't take her back as her games indicate she will eventually come back.
/r/MGTOW01/11/17 11:11 AM
1

Don't know which country he is in, but most of Europe has no-fault divorces so her affair wouldn't affect the divorce settlement here... But do get the lawyer, do it quickly. Having your initial nationality may allow you to move wealth outside the court's jurisdiction.
/r/MGTOW01/11/17 11:09 AM
5

Sabotaging the thing, yes. Withholding sex is their perogative, as it is ours
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:20 PM
0

Thank you brave web-browser. Disabled scripts on that site, adblocker stayed on :-)
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:18 PM
0

I have 2 issues with this. Firstly, we don't need to whine like a feminist self-help group if men are talked out of using a condom. Adults are responsible for their own choices. Secondly, I hate condoms and in a committed relationship, the added benefit is that you don't need a plastic bag to make love.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:17 PM
1

This falls apart on so many levels. what if you are both too drunk to consent? Did you rape eachother? I'd agree with you if they weren't in a sexual relationship already, but this isn't.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 08:34 AM
19

I'm sorry that you feel bad about what happened. But when women make claims this is rape I disagree,, so I have to now too. By your own admission, you were both drunk and possibly she was unable to judge her own actions either.. You already were in a consensual sexual relation, so it makes initiating sex something normal. Bottom line is that getting this drunk is a bad idea and I feel that the relationship was bad outside of these incidents too.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:45 AM
4

True that the article was written with an agenda.. But the conclusion that sex robots will be hacked isn't wrong, as have computerized cars been.
/r/MGTOW08/10/17 07:08 PM
9

Actually, that danger is very real.... But it applies even more to smart/driverless cars. IOT will bring many dangers.
/r/MGTOW08/10/17 07:00 PM
2

Nothing new. Modern lifestyle causes disease. Pharma lives of that.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:56 AM
2

The advice they give is not good, but she's right to see it as a problem in the relationship. Same if the sexes were reversed
/r/MGTOW24/07/17 03:43 PM
8

I'm guessing the solution to this one is not hard. Dr Who is mostly watched by men if I'm not mistaken, so drop the show, don't watch it. If viewership trashes, they'll have to come around.
/r/MGTOW24/07/17 08:21 AM
13

That is exactly what the feminists are saying.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:52 AM
3

Yeah, I've seen so many IRL cases where stephdads abused kids while I've to see the first IRL of a stepmom doing the same.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:07 PM
2

Disagree. The safety of kids should always be more important.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 11:54 AM
10

I rarely hear older men who remained single complain... Men who do want kids tend to have them early enough to make it all work.
/r/MGTOW20/07/17 10:20 AM
1

Yeah, I believe it is possible. Though in western society, it is almost if not completely extinct
/r/MGTOW14/07/17 01:14 PM
58

Karma is a bitch. Dude is probably happily married to a.nice girl and has kids. Love it.
/r/MGTOW14/07/17 09:43 AM
1

True, but the extended family includes the nuclear family...
/r/MGTOW10/07/17 09:17 PM
3

Sex with a condom is nowhere near as good as without. It doesn't in any way feel the same.
/r/MGTOW10/07/17 03:51 PM
1

There's still the risk of pregnancy and if you want to have kids, the nuclear family is the best thing for them. Feminists seem intent on destroying the latter for unknown reasons. MGTOW is a fine life philosophy if you don't want a family, it doesn't work if you do.
/r/MGTOW10/07/17 03:50 PM
4

Option 1. Clearly
/r/MensRights08/07/17 09:34 PM
2

I get your point about befriending them as a precaution, which only works in small towns. But I can't understand policemen or soldiers. It is scary to consider that someone would initiate violence upon another person that did not try to harm them just because another costumed person tells them to do so. I remember the images of the Greek banking crisis where militarized police defended the banks from the people they robbed.
/r/MGTOW08/07/17 07:59 PM
1

I don't agree with the last part of his sentence, but OMG, this is fun to watch
/r/MGTOW29/06/17 11:09 AM
2

Could you please flag pictures like that, nearly threw up over my keyboad. Sjeez, safety first people!
/r/MGTOW29/06/17 09:59 AM
19

What an idiot
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:41 AM
16

Where is her real dad?
/r/MGTOW22/06/17 11:37 AM
1

Go join the feninists, they share your logic.
/r/MGTOW22/06/17 06:01 AM
2

Very to the point
/r/MGTOW21/06/17 06:55 AM
1

I believe the current system will collapse upon itself (at least for the monetary system, that is an absolute certainty), it makes sense to prepare alternatives for when that happens and to provide people with information as much as possible. There is a spectrum of things you can do between doing nothing and committing suicide by trying to physically fight against a power that is absurdly larger then yourself. Until you gain enough numbers to resist by force if needed (not aggression, defensive …
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:10 PM
1

Otherwise we're sadly relegated to using the current system to bring about a more enlightened society That is impossible, you can never turn an inherently violent system into something good. But regardless of what systems do, I will not have any part of them.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:55 PM
1

I falsely assumed you'd be in nation that has acceptable gun laws since I find making such an argument without those provisions isn't really possible since the NAP isn't pacifism which requires that the participant is armed in order to defend himself. I fully agree, big proponent of the right to have weapons. Off course, governments fear armed people more then anything else in the universe. Now they also fear cash money, cryptocurrencies and gold. someone else deciding to ignore the nations laws…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:53 PM
1

You live in one of but a very few nations (I'm sure one of two others do qualify) where you might even have the means to defend yourself from the radicals or the state. Here in Belgium? Not really. keeping an extremely observant eye on the movement of people Observing is indeed in line with NAP. Not resisting the institutions forcing this upon you would actually be violating the NAP since you encourage future violations of an even grander scale which will require even more suffering to mitigate …
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:38 PM
1

The issue is extremists definitely don't follow the NAP so you either act or get acted upon. Acting when a 'truck of peace' hits you sadly doesn't work very well. Something like the NAP works just fine so long as everyone agrees to follow it. The moment people don't (which is the majority of people) it loses any authority sadly There are two important things here. You cannot follow the NAP and initiate violence against any group of people on the premise that they may initiate violence because so…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:46 PM
0

but secular law is definitely less so than extremist religious law (it's really a situation of choose a lesser evil or the grand-daddy of evil). If you follow the principle of non-aggression, you don't need either secular or religious laws. Either can only be forced upon someone like myself through violence since I never agreed to any of it. You don't have to choose any evil at all. The primary threat here is that if you put your religion before your nation which is secular and democratic you It…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:38 PM
0

There's a.difference between Islamists and Muslims, the former are the latter but not the reverse 🙂 But I wanted to point out there's nothing wrong with putting your religion over nationality in your identity. I do the same. Also, statism doesn't magically make immoral things right by rubberstamping them. Killing someone that didn't initiate violence against you is morally wrong, even when politicians tell you to do it.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:14 PM
7

To add to that, my moral convictions are also first, not the laws of any country.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:44 PM
3

That is different. A man is what you biologically are. Nations aren't a natural thing. I hold little value for the country that I was born in or the artificial nationality that comes with it. And, no, I'm not Muslim
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:35 PM
2

I think he may have left his balls in the shelters locker… But seriously, that guy needs help
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:33 PM
2

I think he may have left his balls in the shelters locker… But seriously, that guy needs help
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:33 PM
14

Good news guys, I'm no longer a tree, I'm a Grizzly bear and sueing because you called my paws branches!
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:52 AM
18

I think I'm a tree. Will sue if you advertise gloves for hands instead of branches. Please change the signs on barbershops to botanist trimming salon or I sue!
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:45 AM
18

Technically she is right, she isn't fat but has (lots of) fat. The technical term is (morbidly) obese.
/r/MGTOW17/06/17 09:07 PM
3

Some context would be nice? Is this a daytrip for mental patients?
/r/MGTOW02/06/17 10:20 AM
10

This HAS to be fake. It has to be fake.
/r/MGTOW02/06/17 10:12 AM
1

Society would totally treat a woman different, but that doesn't mean we should hold the opposite extreme view.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:53 AM
0

That's why it's important to always be consistent. Rape implies force. Saying no while taking of your own clothes and kissing the other person is not rape.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:09 AM
-6

Again, there is no more information in there about what happened.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:05 AM
-1

He didn't go into much detail. I will not call it rape based on what he wrote, same if genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:23 PM
15

If the answer is something the government does, can we please have the problem back.
/r/MGTOW29/05/17 08:17 PM
2

Most people use birth control within marriage too though. But I fully agree with your view on abortion.
/r/MGTOW17/05/17 08:41 PM
3

Disagreeing with any woman on anything.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:30 AM
1

It rules the world, but it's just a tool. When a.rich man becomes very sick, he'll envy the poor man who has his health.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:39 AM
1

Scientific consensus is a fraud. Google climategate
/r/MGTOW13/05/17 05:39 AM
1

I'm not continuing, it is beyond pointless.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 10:41 AM
0

Yes they do. It's called a condom or vasectomy. Or as you said above: No law force you to fuck women, you can ignore them. We agree on something! If you make kids you are fully responsible to support and care for them. This is why abortion is insane.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:50 AM
1

I want your words and an as short as possible explanation Dear lady, why do you think you can stomp into a men's subreddit demanding things from people. I mistook your post to be a genuine interest in trying to understand why we dislike feminism. Many here have tried to explain to you. I discuss feminists frequently publicly as challenging their views is for the benefits of those listening. It is however quite pointless to discuss religous dogma.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:49 AM
1

You are quickly highlighting why discussing with feminists is quite pointless. You offer no evidence, refuse to counter any arguments made against you, you make claims about this mysterious patriarchy movement yet retract the notion of a male conspiracy when pressured about it. You did not come here to have any questions answered (which I did try), you came here to make statements and expected them to go unchallenged. So, please go back to /r/feminism and continue on there. Have a nice life.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 04:04 PM
1

if for some reason women are only offered part time jobs From their own propaganda, it's because they feel they should work part time when having kids.... So, who's treating women like kids? (I can send you the links if you like, google translate makes it readable). This is a misconception spread by people who most likely have never read any leftist literature or seek to demonize it. Seek to demonize something that takes away basic human freedom? That doesn't sound hard to do.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 03:50 PM
1

Concerning Rockefeller I can still only view it as an assertion It's really not as the source is a direct descendant of his, but even if it weren't true, it changes little about the effects of feminism. I'm not really approaching this from a US-centric perspective. However, here's some relevant timelines. It seems to me that you're mistaken. No, I'm not. The requirements to vote where: - Be of legal age (21) - owned property worth 50 English pounds - Reside in the country > 1 year The property c…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 03:45 PM
1

But again, I want to point to the patronization of women and children You are lumping two categories together, women and children. Today, women have every single legal right men have, which is not something you can say if you switch genders. But please feel free to argue among feminists that military draft should apply to women, that custody should go equal ways and alimony is patronizing :-) So unless you want to suggest that there's some ancient conspiracy among women to control men, to have m…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 12:45 PM
1

I'll add one more to that :-) I recently pushed a feminist organization on my country on their campaign "equal pay day", because their own numbers show that women get payed as much (and young women more) compared to man of the same age in the same job. Turns out, their complaint is that women often work part time and that makes them earn less then men that work full time. They call this gender discrimination and are protesting to get it changed. How is that equality? The problem with social Marx…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 12:31 PM
1

You're welcome :-) I'll start with my first statement that feminism is a construct of rich men. The movement was fueled by Rockefeller, who benefited hugely from it. This was confirmed by statements Nicholas Rockefeller made to Aaron Russo. Feminism is a globalist, Marxist construct to get rid of families. You talk about liberty and emancipation, but did you know that feminist claims like women not being allowed to vote in the US are simply not true. Historically, voting was only for land owners…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 12:22 PM
2

I define the patriarchal world view as the cultural/social notion that men are the historical >protagonist of mankind. Which inevitably results in women being reduced to the supporting role The current world view is that men are commodities and expendable. They can die on their jobs, they can be killed in wars. Men are here for the power structure and women to use for their own benefit rather then have any intrinsic value. The solution is not feminism, which is that world view taken further to i…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:49 AM
2

Ok, this warrants a longer reply, for the sake of not writing books on here, I will probably post multiple answers. First off, I will partially agree with you, our biggest problem are other men, not women. Before anyone has a fit, please read on. But I'd like to digress briefly, feminism itself was invented and started by (rich) men, it was meant to flood the labor market to drive wages down. And it worked. In that sense, feminists are tools used by people who shape society. That being said, it …
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:41 AM
1

Too long to comment on the phone, but challenge accepted.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:16 PM
2

You're catching on. All this has been socially engineered. Now, of they want the population below 0.5bn before 2030, this won't cut it.
/r/MGTOW09/05/17 03:09 PM
2

Given that most are feminist and there for bitter and angry, yes this could be true
/r/MGTOW09/05/17 08:54 AM
10

They started their 'relationship' when he was 15! What would you call that had the sexes been reversed?
/r/MGTOW08/05/17 04:23 PM
10

Normaal is thinking there are 30ish genders and you can become any of them by thinking so. A nutjob knows there are only 2 and by the same simple logic, a world controlled and molded by an elite class is obvious. I'd rather be the nut job.
/r/MGTOW04/05/17 10:20 AM
8

To get rid of the family unit, which will slowly be replaced by the state. A lot of progress has been made by cutting fathers out of the picture and have single moms depend on the state, so they will never critique it.
/r/MGTOW04/05/17 09:05 AM
6

It's more complicated then that. The CIA is just part of the deep state and works for the globalist communists. Feminism is indeed one of their creations.
/r/MGTOW04/05/17 09:03 AM
5

Belgium also didn't
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:18 PM
2

My reference to statism was just an analogy. Walking away from gynocentric society will be partial. It won't let you be, from prosecuting manspreading to gender quota, it will impact you like the armed minions will be sent on anarchists who cut ties to the criminal organization that claims to be authority.
/r/MGTOW27/04/17 08:39 AM
3

just a note on that. As an anarchist, I already want nothing to do with the state. But walking away does not work when being chased. The state will hunt you with tax extortion, society will prosecute manspreading, it will favor women in employment and so on.
/r/MGTOW27/04/17 06:59 AM
7

That is not MGTOW, please get help
/r/MGTOW25/04/17 02:18 PM
2

I think we all fear that...
/r/MGTOW14/04/17 07:20 AM
36

Cultural Marxism
/r/MGTOW12/04/17 10:08 PM
6

Oh, and I forgot to mention that no-fault divorces should be removed. It is insane that a party can blow-up a marriage and financially profit from it.
/r/MGTOW10/04/17 03:09 PM
4

A fair marriage is hard to define. It's an agreement to do life together. It is fair when both parties agree to the terms. Which may not be in any way like what you described or it may be exactly that.
/r/MGTOW10/04/17 02:55 PM
8

Kids, 4 boys. And they are mine. Having sons got me into Men's rights.
/r/MGTOW10/04/17 06:27 AM
62

Some men love to be fathers, I for one do.
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 10:30 PM
2

Banks tend to fund both sides of any war, so it is hugely profitable. Secondly, they need a reason for the upcoming financial crash, war provides that.
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 09:41 PM
3

Look, it's a though spot to be in for him. But there really was no way this could turn out well, so divorce was at that point his best option because there were no children of his own yet… Besides that, she pretty much had infidelity tattooed on her forehead from the start.
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 08:50 AM
3

You shouldn't have made her abort, it was over back then. So, now you can only push forward and divorce anyway
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 06:37 AM
7

The banks urgently need WW3...
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 06:21 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 09:05 AM
1

*Flood
/r/MGTOW06/04/17 05:56 AM
1

Feminism was socially engineered to food the labor market to cut salaries. Which it did
/r/MGTOW06/04/17 05:38 AM
7

Oh, we can. Protesting doesn't work BTW. Just wake up enough men, collectively refuse to comply and watch things change. But as long as our biggest oppositions is other men, we can forget change
/r/MGTOW05/04/17 08:19 AM
2

Not all women do. I happen to have 4 sons, but I could have easily had 4 daughters instead. Would they be genetically defect and inherently bad? I refuse to believe so. Girls are being raised and conditioned socially to be a certain way (just as men are). That is the cause of the current condition.
/r/MGTOW05/04/17 07:19 AM
9

Gynocentrism is a part of globalism, it's advanced social engineering to break the population. So, globalism (marxism) is the bigger threat.
/r/MGTOW04/04/17 07:54 PM
2

April fools
/r/MGTOW02/04/17 08:19 AM
3

The problem is with him. She's quite right not to date a dude crazy enough to kill himself to get a date with anyone, talk about low self worth.
/r/MGTOW21/03/17 10:39 AM
5

It's uncommon amongst Europeans, though legal in the entire EU AFAIK. The practice is limited to Muslims and Jews.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:08 PM
1

Oh, yes
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:32 PM
2

I think that may be the only place where we don't score to bad, to my knowledge you can obtain DNA tests in child support battles as a father. If that gets you out of payments depends on circumstances (if you knew before that the child wasn't yours, but you did act as the father, that would be a problem).
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:13 PM
6

Most are the usual: - Mothers win most if not all custody battles - Divorces almost all started by women - Despite the previous, women win big-time in alimony - Positive discrimination means that young single women now outearn young single men - Kids do not automatically get the father's name any more (even for married couples) I could go on for a while :-)
/r/MensRights20/03/17 04:32 PM
1

Belgium is as horrible as it gets form an MRA perspective...
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:20 PM
2

Well, at least in Belgium (where I am), people should see the strangeness in what they are asking...
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:52 AM
1

Basically, trans persons have to take hormones for the rest of their lives, or a lot of their physical appearance reverts back to their biological sex. Secondly, they still have the same chromosome pair as before, essentially biologically they are still the same sex as before. There is no process that makes women men or vice versa on anything but the superficial level.
/r/MGTOW20/03/17 09:51 AM
6

There's no opinion. They are physically men and have to constantly take medication to keep looking like women.
/r/MGTOW18/03/17 11:32 AM
3

This is an organisations tied to a union and an MP. Love it how they openly admit that single women without kids make more then single men without kids. You'd think that wakes people up, but it won't.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:26 AM
1

This is mainly a Belgian thing, it is illegal (with high penalties) to pay a woman less for the same job, so if that happens you can just sue. So they changed their narratives.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:25 AM
3

Well, on their site, the feminist organisations stated that working part time accounted for the wage gap and single women now out-earn men! How they call that equality defies logic, but we already knew that.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 10:17 PM
3

admid -> admit
/r/MensRights16/03/17 04:54 PM
1

We had extensive talks about that already :-)
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 01:35 PM
1

I don't agree that what we are seeing now is the true nature of women, as in they are not born this way, they are thought to be this way. Hence it is entirely possible for women to be different. But as I put forward in my post, the thing of greatest value in my life as been fatherhood. I do not think that recommending they skip that is good for them either. I honestly don't know what to recommend them yet, I did have several talks with my eldest sons already about being careful...
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 01:12 PM
2

Indeed, that is part of why I say that MGTOW is a personal solution only. In my case, I need to at least try to change things so my boys get a fair chance.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 01:00 PM
2

I agree that men currently get a very raw deal. But saying that can't go away is not right IMO. I think it is quite possible to a mutually beneficial form of marriage and relationships. That is just not something feminists want.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 12:46 PM
2

And men are men... Meaning that we both want things out of relationships in general. Which doesn't have to be a bad thing.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 12:18 PM
1

We are in agreement on many, many things. Thanks for your well thought out reply!
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 12:17 PM
2

Interesting perspective, so you believe it has always been the same? Most RP (myself included) assume this started somewhere last century. I personally even believe it is deliberately engineered, but I don't think many see it that way.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 11:49 AM
1

I believe it is possible, but it would require a large portion of the male population to wake up. Right now, most men are more against MRA/MGTOW then even the feminists themselves, most men call themselves feminists.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 11:43 AM
3

It's quite powerful to have this kind of bond between you. But he wouldn't have had you if he had gone MGTOW. In my case, my boys were a big part of waking up.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 11:41 AM
1

Let me be clear, those who allowed their minds to be poisoned and inflicted harm on others did so themselves, they could have chosen not to. I don't want to change society for them, I want to change it stop the damage for those who have done nothing wrong: kids. They're the victims of this culture.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 11:38 AM
3

Women are social creatures and they have been successfully programed to respond the way they do. Not only that, but people forget that when feminists flooded the workforce, wages dropped sharply because of the increased supply. Why do you think rich men funded that cause... Maybe women are easier to condition, but it also provided the biggest benefit.
/r/MGTOW13/03/17 11:35 AM
2

Correct. That needs to be reverted asap
/r/MGTOW06/03/17 10:08 PM
6

The biggest problem are no-fault divorces. If you cheat, your life should be dramatically different
/r/MGTOW06/03/17 10:35 AM
17

Smart guy…
/r/MGTOW01/03/17 05:39 PM
1

Thanks. But there is an issue, if the DVD is region 1 (US), it will not play on EU DVD players, I think bluray has the same issue (though I don't have that). The itunes store is also region blocked, I already checked.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 02:28 PM
1

Thanks, it is on itunes as a pre-order for the US only. My problem is mainly that most of the venues she offers are not available in Europe...
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:53 AM
5

Don't know about that. Remember during the election Trump talking about his friend 'Jef' liking beautiful women almost as much as he does, but liking them 'younger'. Disturbing stuff.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:34 PM
7

Epstein. He's a close friend of Trump also.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 01:29 PM
4

Didn't read this article, but in Belgium press it was reported that they 'inserted' the a telescopic baton... That is rape. BTW, how can you beat someone with it and cause internal damage? Why was his pants down.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:57 PM
6

So, let's give every woman living with a man a shorter workday! And put a massive fine with checks that their men never lift a finger to do any housework. :-)
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:14 PM
2

I don't think women are hard wired to be that way. You see it even in die hard-feminist once they pass 50, many regret not having invested time in kids. But I got 4 sons, so I haven't lived through it. It must not be easy though as kids are exposed to much more than their parents and every disney movie looks like a recipe on how to screw up your life.
/r/MGTOW06/02/17 08:54 AM
2

The question is if the behavior is born to them or learned. I don't believe half of the population has always been born like that. What if I ever have a daughter, do I treat her like she is malformed? (I won't)
/r/MGTOW06/02/17 08:25 AM
3

They weren't born to do anything, get a grip man. Society thought them for 14 years that they are princesses and men are evil. The consequence will also fall on them.
/r/MGTOW06/02/17 08:10 AM
3

I doubt that, MGTOW is for one not limited to the US and Trump is not that popular elsewhere. At best, you could argue that 75% of the US based MGTOW are in favor of him, though I doubt they support his every decision.
/r/MGTOW31/01/17 11:42 AM
2

It is indeed ridiculous to believe the president actually runs a country, he never has.
/r/MGTOW31/01/17 11:41 AM
6

I highly doubt it. Also, I think it is more that Trump will push less for legislation against men, where Clinton was publicly and openly anti-male. So just from a men's rights/MGTOW viewpoint, Trump is IMO more neutral instead of possitive.
/r/MGTOW31/01/17 11:40 AM
0

While I do think men can be raped by women, we should be careful that we don't reinforce the same low standards as are currently used for female rape. To be rape it has to be involuntary by nature and the victim has to have resisted and/or at least said no. Regretting it the morning after doesn't make it rape, doing it while drunk doesn't either. Being passed out does, being physically overpowered does, anything an adult does with a minor does.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:26 PM
3

I'm the father of 4 (boys) BTW
/r/MGTOW29/09/16 02:23 PM
3

The problem with Western culture amongst many things is that we measure everything by how happy it makes us. That is a recipe for disaster, and one of the reasons marriage will never work here.
/r/MGTOW29/09/16 02:20 PM
1

I couldn't even read the whole thing. It would be much simpler to allow fathers a dna test and if a child is not his, refund him all payed Child support. After all, we'd never force a woman to pay for a child the man conceived with another woman during Marriage.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 08:37 PM
1

valuation fees, bailouts?
/r/MGTOW01/08/16 02:01 PM
-1

I don't know where he got the story. But I don't see anything wrong with reflecting how you survived a difficult time.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 09:13 PM
2

There are tons of entitled women out there who use men. But being left to take over a business you don't know and raising kids on your own is hard, be it the man or the woman. So without more information, I'd cut her a lot of slack.
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 12:02 PM
-2

So, let's judge this very muddy situations without more details. Nobody knows what their situation was and why he committed suicide, yet you blame it on the wife by default. WTF?
/r/MGTOW18/07/16 12:00 PM
1

Yes. But most of us do. Secondly, most that don't mind aim Young also.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:34 AM
4

She claims to be early thirties. I will bet that by late thirties to early forties, she'll be crying why no man want her. And how guys in their late thirties go after girls under thirty.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:51 PM
1

Does collecting taxes end racism, does it end sexism?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:15 AM
-1

Let me Be clear, coercing someone into sex is very wrong... But for it to be rape, the victim has to be unable to refuse.. Like being passed out or held down
/r/MensRights05/02/16 09:30 PM
-1

Thaise are blackmail, not rape.... Very wrong But there is a difference
/r/MensRights05/02/16 09:06 PM
-7

Blackmail as in I hold your mother captive and will kill her, yes. But that doesn't seem to be the case here. He is talking manipulation. This goes both for men and women...
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:28 PM
-11

Only the knife is rape. Same standards should apply to both genders.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:21 PM
0

What the fuck are you smoking? /exit this Bs
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:13 PM
1

I'm a parent, we keep creeps away from our kids. You defending a borderline paedophile is frankly disgusting.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:36 PM
2

You are talking marriages and starting a life versus having sex with a minor. There is a big difference
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:46 AM
2

Your father probably wasn't 49 though... There's a big difference in 2 17yo as opposed to a 49yo
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:24 AM
-6

If a 49 year old man or woman approached my 17 year old kid, I would kill them.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:48 PM
0

In many such cases, I agree. But she was 17. I would have the same idea if genders where reversed. Though technically, it is not I crime I think
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:43 PM
1

That also holds true
/r/MGTOW08/09/15 01:48 PM
2

You are partly right, that is what western feminist women do and I don't think there is any way you can ever be happy with one of them. But it does not hold true for older couples or non-western (or the very rare non-feminist western) woman.
/r/MGTOW08/09/15 01:48 PM
-1

I take it to mean that you don't bother fretting over every little detail. This goes to age-old arguments like the position of the toilet seat. It does not go for your wife making decisions for you. Just my 2 cents.
/r/MGTOW08/09/15 01:46 PM
2

I mean here :-). For me europe
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:15 AM
2

I like the idea. If she has other men, her ex should not pay anymore. I'd like that to apply both ways here also and in case of divorce, an adultering partner should not get compensation and leaves the home.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 01:04 PM
1

Kids don't only do that as babies. And protection offered by dad is often more impressive.
/r/MGTOW02/08/15 10:30 AM
1

I plan to take it easy mid fifties, play some with my grandkids but not stay up nights. Youth is wasted on the young
/r/MGTOW02/08/15 09:27 AM
1

I had my first kid at 27, than 29, 33 and now 38. If I would give my younger self advice I would tell him to do it earlier. Most 20ers are behaving like kids because we have pushed this concept of extended adolescence which is very new. My generation probably is the first to not treat a 20 year old as a full man. Other cultures do, and I see behavior patterns in their 20 year olds that European males show late thirties. I'm curious though, how old is your wife?
/r/MGTOW02/08/15 09:25 AM
6

Though men can reproduce at almost any age, there are 2 things to consider. Recent discoveries show that semen from older men is not as good as before leading to increased health problems in their kids. But you also don't have as much energy ever again as you did in your twenties. But also in terms of grandchildren, it's better not to wait. If you become a parent late in life and your kids also do that, you won't have much time with your grandchildren either. I consider all that more fun than an…
/r/MGTOW01/08/15 08:37 PM
0

That did not make much sense.. And this waiting until you are almost a corpse to have kids is insane.. If you want kids, do it young
/r/MGTOW01/08/15 06:01 PM
0

Again not true.. Going from the assumption that both parents actually love their kids, the need to both be around all the time.. In addition, there's the damage of not having a single home but commuting between parents and the stress of the dating lives of both parents and potential blended family.
/r/MGTOW31/07/15 10:13 AM
0

I disagree that divorce without fighting is not bad for kids. Secondly, kids need both mom and dad close all the time. And lastly, there is the mom and dad dating hell or the horror of blended families.
/r/MGTOW30/07/15 09:25 PM
1

As a father of 3 sons, I talk to them about everything.. From the fake claims by women to what to look for in a wife. But most important: I act. Children will do as you do, not as you say.. Lead by example!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 11:30 AM
2

That is not true. Kids need both parents around and divorce precludes that. Although unpopular politicly, studies do back that up.
/r/MGTOW29/07/15 05:57 AM
4

His marriage sounds awfully.. But please stop acting like 21 is young.. At 21 you are a man, not a boy so get on with your life.. If that means MG TOW, OK.. But don't marry and have kids when you are half dead.
/r/MGTOW28/07/15 07:52 PM
2

Divorcing also fucks kids up... Perhaps even more so
/r/MGTOW28/07/15 07:48 PM
2

I want to be on there too!
/r/MensRights28/07/15 07:42 PM
-6

This is a long story with many facets... In a healthy relationship, women are right not to tolerate porn. You should make love to eachother. My guess is that she is emotionally invested in the relationship, hence the jealousy.. He needs to grow a pair and tell her NO.
/r/MGTOW28/07/15 07:34 PM
0

Ok, I read most of that and I disagree with the point that this was rape, though I do agree that if the genders where reversed, society would have called it that. But it isn't. Basicly you only gave a verbal no, while doing yes. You chose to get drunk, you chose to make out, you chose everything else and you let her into your room. You even admit to have actively taken part in this (being on top). It is insane to define this as rape because you said no and did yes, because you regretted it after…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:21 AM
1

Ok, I'm sorry for you man, but... You let her tie you up, enjoyed the oral, you posted "...I'm in extacy and before you know it", so I don't think you can claim rape here. From your story, you were hardly screaming her to stop, fighting to get the cuffs off. In fact, you cuddled ans spent the rest of the night with her. The only thing you resent is her ending up pregnant. Which could have happened (with a low probability) if you used a condom too, or it can happen with her on the pill. The only …
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:37 PM
1

That really got to me. I lived the life of the husband for years thinking I really was wrong. I'm not (not all the time anyway)
/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:19 AM
0

Actually, if it works both ways, it would actually make sense!
/r/MensRights07/01/15 06:40 PM
2

Anyone from Belgium or the Netherlands who likes our cause, interested to join?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 04:14 PM
0

Prostitute, how gross
/r/MGTOW05/01/15 07:48 PM
1

Though I can't help you right now, I feel for you and I hope you make it.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 11:40 AM
-9

Isis does not exist and I'm sure twitter will not ban CIA accounts
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:05 PM
2

I checked the other's twitter accounts. It is amazing that they maintain that the quotes are false while they are on the site of the guardian. Amazing that they got away with that!
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:02 PM
1

Maintain itself at what cost? Constant perpetual war, engineered crisises, etc. I think we define success differently.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:00 PM
1

We disagree that it functions (well)
/r/MensRights27/12/14 10:45 PM
1

Baby's don't have a soul, and neither do you. In essence you are right. I do not have a soul. I am a soul and I currently have a body.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 10:17 PM
1

Society is selective in what murder it allows. Abortion is just one example, the death penalty, war is another. You draw an arbitrary line on fetal development which others don't Agee upon either. Hence the discussion on what is the age limit on it. I am closest to a taoist. And as for your statement that we don't have souls, read the book 'the field' , it summarizes many scientific trials that put popular science on it's head. Essentially proving beyond any doubt that we are more than carbon ba…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 10:08 PM
1

Regardless if you accept the existence of a soul, killing is killing.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:51 PM
1

I am most certainly not a christian (or Muslim or Jew). What do you call laws against murdering adults and why force them on me?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:32 PM
1

Who is not capable of raising a kid? It is not complex, but it is very hard. It's a choice though. So, again, I disagree
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:30 PM
1

The mistakes are your own to carry. As for rape, that is a false argument for abortion, solved by 'abortion is only allowed in these cases: rape, ...'
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:06 PM
1

Who determines when a human is actually a human? Doctors who are failing to find a standard for when you are dead? Do the understand how our soul works? When does a baby get his soul? Secondly, actions have consequences. Having sex, specially unprotected, always includes a chance of pregnancy be it 0.01% or 35%. Doing the deed means accepting that.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 12:36 PM
3

Wanna bet the weren't
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:53 AM
1

I disagree with you. And the man and woman already made their choice when having (unprotected) sex.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:41 AM
0

Also, gender is real. Man don't carry babies etc. Ignoring the differences that nature created is foolish. Not saying it should be forbidden, but it makes sense. For example, many feminists want the career in full and kids, they put that latter of until 35-40 than cry that they cannot conceive...
/r/MensRights26/12/14 10:39 PM
8

I highly disagree with most of what you wrote. And if you look at the west, women are the privileged class by far. As for abortion, there aren't two people involved, but three, the one ending up being killed gets no vote.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 10:29 PM
1

The last months, we have been seeing a lot of protests from different groups including unions but also small business owner groups against the austerity measures of this government, this follows similar situations in Greece and Spain. I assumed the women to be union activists instead of feminists. When I saw a picture of the Belgian PM in this sub, I was naturally curious.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 12:16 PM
1

That means I was wrong, sorry. I just started posting here when I found this sub
/r/MensRights25/12/14 09:56 AM
1

Belgium is different. The pm is from the only Walloon party in a federal government of 4 parties. The mayor of Antwerp is the chairman of the largest of the 3 Flemish parties and controls all 3 of them. Hence, the pm is stale and can only cooperate or let the government fall. The latter scenario will most likely mean opposition for his party again as they are not strong in wallonia and needed this coalition to make it to the federal government, hence he has no power.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 11:41 PM
0

You forgot to ask the commenter who liked our pm the same BTW :-)
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:21 PM
-1

Apart from his political views being idiotic, he is only the pm in name having to do the bidding of the real pm who is the mayor of Antwerp...
/r/MensRights24/12/14 07:33 PM
8

This is Belgium, previous PM's got pied and not all by women. We don't shoot on sight
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:59 PM
1

He is an idiot, but that's not a discussion to have here.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:58 PM
-4

Why is this post here, nothing to do with men's rights. As a previous commenter stated, this was a purely economic protest, not feminists nor on a men's rights topic...
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:57 PM
2

I actually like it... Well said of him and not anti-male at all...
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter