TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hackop Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by hackop on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

All those "single" subs are always dominated by bitter women. The thing is, people certainly can be happy and single. I've been mostly single for quite a while and I'm quite content. The people who are truly happy aren't joining a reddit sub like that and posting to it though. I'm sure this person is miserable, not necessarily because she's single but because she's just miserable in general. Subs like that are just a way for them to continue to lie to themselves and/or everyone else about it.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 04:02 PM
13

None of what you wrote requires nor is an intrinsic part of being married. All of that can (and should) be done without getting married. The one exception might be having kids but, really, no one should so idiotic as to do that at all. Speaking as someone in his 40s who's "been there done that" and, thankfully, dodged the kid bullet.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 10:02 PM
5

Lol, imagine telling 15YOE engineer / data scientist that they don't know how data works. The arrogance.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:29 PM
7

I don't have to prove god doesn't exist; the religious have to prove that he does. We don't prove medicine doesn't work; we prove that it does. You're (intellectually dishonestly) asking for people to prove a negative and then acting smug about it. Sorry, burden of proof is all on you. You're making the substantive claim. Not only that but your "parameters" are bullshit. Who is the judge of "authentically", "qualified", and "relationship appropriate"? You? Please. I'm sure no matter what anyone …
/r/MensRights05/03/25 01:02 AM
12

Congratulations, you've discovered survivorship bias ⭐. Nice that you've worked with dozens of men who managed to fall into the niche where therapy wasn't useless. Now let's take a look at the millions where it is.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:45 PM
7

The reality is these white men in power, who SHOULD be representing your interests, largely simply do not. So you understand that just because they may share appearance, it doesn't mean they actually have representation. This makes what the above commenter said true: Men don't have actual representation. The (white) men in congress don't represent men. If we're being honest, they represent corporations, lobby groups, or the top 0.1% in wealth but definitely not "men".
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:41 PM
30

First, it's no secret that a vast majority of alimony is paid by men. This is a fact and is not up for dispute. In my opinion, alimony is inherently immoral and unethical. There is no possible justification to force an adult to pay another adult some form of continued compensation when a relationship ends. Aside from that, there is no standard of calculating both duration and amount of alimony across the US. Often, a spouse can be awarded permanent alimony of an excessive amount. Alimony can als…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 09:10 PM
111

I'll give you some specifics, since you asked. Completely rework or, ideally, abolish state-sponsored marriage Abolish alimony Child custody is default 50/50 and there needs to be a damn good reason for that to deviate A focus on male mental health - Therapy/Counseling are great for women's problems. The current practices do little to nothing to assist and help with men's problems, unless they happen to overlap with women's problems. Domestic violence (DV) laws needs to be addressed to stop pain…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 06:02 PM
15

This is something I've thought about before as well. There are some other good replies in this thread about data, methodology, etc. My issue is more of a semantic/linguistic one, which I think is what you're getting at. My native language is American English. When we use the word "attempt" in nearly every other context aside from suicide, the attempt is the overarching umbrella which is then broken into subcategories, mainly success and failure. If I attempt to run a mile, fail once, and succeed…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 03:32 PM
2

I've used Roboform for about a decade now and it works great for me. At work we use 1Password which is quite similar. They both work similarly where you have a master password to access all the stored information. That master password is essentially the symmetric encryption key to your stored data so even the provider can't access it. There's also a browser extension which detects when you're logging into a new site for the first time. It'll offer to save your username/password and generate a pa…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 03:01 PM
-1

That would be quite odd. Marriage is literally just an asset agreement between two people and the state saying "Treat these two, and their income/assets, as one entity." Having legally separate assets post-marriage isn't really possible as it would go against the exact (and only) thing the marriage is supposed to accomplish. Anything acquired during the marriage is acquired by that single entity in the eyes of the law. There may be some grey areas if you start talking about trusts and shell corp…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:03 PM
1

Assuming you're not trolling... It's trash because it's the belief in a fiction which has been, and continues to be used to harm others, especially those not in the same cult. It's not simply "different", it's outright dangerously incorrect. Not only that, but the sense of moral superiority that accompanies religion is used as a flimsy justification to control and limit what others can do and say. An appeal to an imaginary authority figure (god) along with the inane bible passages does nothing t…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:35 PM
1

The bible is a nonsensical book of bullshit and has no place in any type of serious discourse. GTFO with your religious trash. I wish you morons would just exit the MRM as all you do is make it more difficult for people take our issues seriously. You contribute nothing of value.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 04:03 PM
16

Is there any point in marrying someone with these superficial requirements In most circumstances, the answer is "no", it isn't worth marrying someone. More people, especially men, need to truly evaluate marriage for what it is and not what we (society) pretend that it is. What it is for most men is a high risk, low reward proposition. It's a contract which you aren't allowed to read, that can be altered at any time, and that the other person is often incentivized to break. Ask yourself, what are…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 02:33 PM
12

Similar to what you wrote, this is what I've noticed when it comes to what men and women find attractive in each other. Men are attracted to beauty, youth, kindness, etc. Women are attracted to ambition, power, money, social status. I don't think it has to do specifically with "survival" but just has to be something that she sees can directly benefit her. Essentially, women are attracted to things that they can benefit from or exploit in another person to improve their standard of living or soci…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 06:09 PM
15

Everyone has to do what's best for them. However, I think most people (not just men) have an idealized view of marriage. We need to realize what marriage is and what it isn't. The prevailing view of marriage is all about love, fidelity, commitment, partnership, 'til death do us part. It's important to understand that none of these things is intrinsic to marriage. You can have all of them without a marriage license. What marriage actually is, is an asset agreement between two people and the state…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 02:24 AM
1

Oh this has been going on long before covid. This comment does a good job of outlining the decay of "third places". Men have been hit especially hard by this as many of our traditional third places have been actively demonized for being men-only.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 06:48 PM
46

This might be part of it but even men who have high beauty standards (whatever that may mean to a particular individual) are far far less critical than other women. I would also wager that the level of criticism from the social group will increase if, overall, that social group is generally more objectively attractive. Meaning, very attractive women are even more harsh towards their peers and would pick out smaller flaws.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:20 PM
4

Grow up. It's not murder and you anti-choice morons give the rest of us on this sub a bad name. Also, the fact that you even mention the whole kpop backstory is nonsensical and only serves as emotionally-charged bullshit. She's 24, wasn't ready to be a mom, got an abortion. End of story. She made a perfectly acceptable choice.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 09:45 PM
5

The quote in question wasn't about the single mom. It was about the other woman the writer mentioned who didn't have kids and was looking to get married but was perpetually single.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 06:11 PM
14

One of the longer term consequences of this and instances like it is that statistics will continue to fail to demonstrate how common female abusers are. These women are never charged, never entered into the system, and therefore never counted when the data is run. People will still assume males are the primary pedophiles or child abusers because males are charged.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 06:37 PM
13

Eh... I'm 40 this year and I've been dating since my divorce when I was 31. Is it easier to simply go on dates? Sure. But it's not easier to find someone who's worth a shit and a great partner. In fact, it's almost harder because single women in their 30s and 40s are single for a reason. There are good ones out there, and I've met some (we just didn't fit for other reasons) but it's few and far between. Finding a woman who wants to be a good partner, cares about you, and wants to put in the effo…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 02:16 AM
1

What type of joining process did the group have? The one around here is annoying to try and get into.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:34 PM
1

Oh nice! Frozen Tundra is one of my go-to's. I love the mentholated ones.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:37 PM
1

You may want to check out this company. I order all my shave soaps from them (as well as bar soaps). https://www.stirlingsoap.com/
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:33 PM
1

That's what r/menkampf is for
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:07 PM
7

I'm familiar with this statistic and you are grossly misrepresenting it. It is NOT "90% of college educated women". That would imply that it's 90% of all married, college-educated women that initiate divorce. The stat that 70% of divorces are initiated by women is accurate. 90% OF THOSE are initiated by college-educated women. So it's 90% of the 70%. That's a very different number.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:29 PM
18

This is exactly my viewpoint. The issue is finding women who are accepting of that. However, I'll say that the women I've met who do understand that and agree with it (despite it not working out between us) have always been open-minded, understanding, and genuinely kind people. So there's that.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:20 PM
1

I appreciate the reply. I'm getting the impression that the legal system views Common Law Marriage as a bit of a headache then. I wonder how the state legislature views it and how many districts are in favor / opposed to it. It may still be worthwhile to formulate an argument to have Common Law Marriage abolished in the state of CO, bringing us in line with a majority of other states. I just have to get off my butt and write my senator :D.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 04:34 PM
1

Also in CO. How do the courts and law firms view common law marriage here? Favorably or more of a nuisance? I've considered making an attempt through state government to get it abolished but I'm unsure how receptive people would be to that idea.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 03:59 PM
1

This is leftist mentality and I'm not saying that to be edgy. This isn't in American or any other specific national context, it's more theory-based. If you look at leftist (not liberal) politics at its core, they're centered around ideas of oppressed and oppressors (think Marxist philosophy). Someone who identifies as a leftist (not liberal, as you can have liberals who aren't leftists) needs to categorize people. They need to know who is an oppressor and who is oppressed. That style of group-or…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:29 PM
1

they're not asking us to throw people in jail just because they accuse someone of raping them The problem is a lot of them are asking for exactly that. I think there are a lot of sane, moderate, people who just want proper justice and due process to be done. However, we've also seen the side where those making accusations do, in fact, want men instantly imprisoned and publicly shamed.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:08 PM
1

I'd wager I could pay 6 women $1000 each to accuse someone of raping them. Heck, maybe even $100 each. There's no possible way they'd get penalized for it and they're now richer. It's a win/win. People's morals are easily manipulated, especially when you frame it as making sure the "wrong" people don't have power.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:19 AM
1

I'm sorry, I wasn't asking about Democrats and Republicans. In your original post, you also didn't mention Democrats and Republicans. You mentioned liberals and conservatives. There are plenty of liberal ideas and liberal people who are neither Democrats nor Republicans. That's why I was asking, specifically, why liberals wouldn't be good for men's rights. Not Democrats.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:41 PM
1

I'm genuinely curious why you'd think that liberals (not leftists) wouldn't be good for men's rights? Liberals, almost by definition, want to change and progress that status quo. Conservatives want to maintain it. Mens rights, in general, is an extremely liberal idea (just not a leftist idea). We want to change the status quo for alimony, child support, custody, mental health issues, prison, etc. I see the separation with people on the left, as leftists care far more about group identity and the…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:13 PM
1

What the feminists want of me is something they haven't examined because it comes from religion. They want me to bear witness. What they would really like me to say is, 'Ha, sisters, I stand with you side by side in your struggle toward the golden dawn where all those beastly men are no more.' Do they really want people to make oversimplified statements about men and women? In fact, they do. I've come with great regret to this conclusion. — Doris Lessing, The New York Times, 25 July 1982 She's h…
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:36 PM
6

There's certainly a difference between systemic sexism and some asshole being sexist. There will always be sexist people in the world. Men and women will both continue to experience sexism at individual levels probably forever. She's more than likely referring to institutionalized sexism, which is illegal and gone. Sexism is not legal nor is it enshrined in any type of governing documents / systems. The rest is up to individuals. Unfortunately people are shitty and will continue to be so.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:49 PM
18

Bro... That sucks. Not to get all /r/ relationships on you, but this isn't a problem that's going to solve itself. Excessive weight gain, obesity, refusal to better oneself, refusal to work on problems together... these are all valid reasons to leave a relationship. It seems like unless she has a drastic shift in attitude, you're going to end up miserable and depressed (if you aren't already). I don't know why people get upset when there's talk of ending a relationship over excessive weight gain…
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:40 PM

No joke. I'm 5'11" 160lb and keep myself in shape. It's difficult as hell to find a woman who does the same. I'm not gonna be a prick and ask more of my partner than I'm willing to give, myself. However, I would expect them to put in as much effort as I do. It's like looking for a damn unicorn.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:33 PM
1

When did that happen?
/r/MensRights10/02/17 06:59 PM

Where something looks somewhat human, but not human enough, and it makes people feel weird and uncomfortable. Robots that look like robots, cool. Robots that look exactly like humans, cool. Robots that look human but not perfectly, weird.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:30 PM

Women’s groups will counter that even if most of the wage gap can be explained by women’s choices, those choices are not truly free. I'm sorry, but that is ridiculous. I'm tired of this moving-of-the-goalposts. If you don't have the strength of character, willpower, discipline, etc to go against what your friends and family think you should do, then tough shit. Your choices are still your choices and your responsibility. I've met so many people, men and women, who, as adults, are still essential…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 02:57 PM

Awesome, thanks for the response.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:22 PM

I may check this out. I assume you're the author. I read through the table of contents and some of the excerpts. I get the impression you're making a lot of, possibly controversial or radical, claims. Do you cite sources for your data points? Is the book mostly opinion?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:06 PM

I wonder how many teachers understand this about boys and how they learn. Is this covered when getting a teaching degree? This seems like a problem that may vanish if more men were in the teaching fields.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:15 PM

This should also help, in addition to all the answers already provided: http://np.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1jt1u5/cmv_i_think_that_mens_rights_issues_are_the/cbi2m7a
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:56 PM

His links are a bit of sarcasm because, obviously, those feminists don't support it. You know there are feminists that aren't a part of any organization, right? Yup, and essentially they don't matter. I'm sure many of them are great people and are reasonable but they simply don't matter. They're the silent majority who, through their silence, implicitly support the vocal minority (the organizations, such as the ones eaton80 linked to). Your point about there being many women, many identifying as…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:20 PM
3

Is that exactly the "Women Are Wonderful" effect? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:35 PM
1

Ah, ok, understood. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:07 PM
1

Do... Do you live in Boulder, CO by any chance? Your description is perfectly apt.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:54 PM
1

When you say 20% having 80% success, are you referring to 20% of men or women or what?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:26 PM
1

I thought it was just me and my noscript not showing the content. Is it really just that few sentences? That's fantastic...
/r/MensRights19/12/14 05:51 PM
3

Stitches?! Heck, I had one 4, almost 5 years ago now, and there were no stitches. They must have used a scalpel for yours then? Mine was a non-scalpel version. Flippin' awesome!
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:37 PM
3

I'm with you.
/r/seduction07/10/10 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter