hafetysazard Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
43	My girlfriend is calling me immature for being upset that my PS4 broke. If my wife's Sims saved games got deleted, she'd probably feel the same way. I know what it feels like, so I'd comfort her too.	/r/MensRights	30/01/23 09:17 AM
1	The naked truth about marriage and divorce in the 21st century [comics] Is that like second wave MRA? Why are men behind a wave, equality now!!	/r/MensRights	27/05/16 11:12 PM
3	The naked truth about marriage and divorce in the 21st century [comics] I want kids. I want to pass on what I know, and keep the family line going. I want to build a family unit, because a collective effort is always more successful than individual efforts. Lots of reasons to want kids, actually.	/r/MensRights	27/05/16 06:42 PM
2	The naked truth about marriage and divorce in the 21st century [comics] That sounds about as stupid as when women say, "the patriarchal society forces women to behave a certain way,"(ie. it is male influence society's fault certain women make bad choices). You're essentially using the same logic, but in reverse.	/r/MensRights	27/05/16 06:25 PM
3	The naked truth about marriage and divorce in the 21st century [comics] I would like to contradict what you are saying citing that online dating has done an extremely good job at finding compatible partners, and relationships tend to last a lot longer than relationships discovered through traditional means. It could likely be a contributing factor to lower rates of divorce, as well. 10 years ago it would be disregarded, but now it is hard to ignore because it is now an extremely popular way to meet partners.	/r/MensRights	27/05/16 06:15 PM
0	Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised Give me some more details, come up with a situation, and I will use my limited legal knowledge to come up with a verdict.	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 05:02 PM
6	Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised I am thankful that people in this community bring this situation into light. I am not circumcized, so naturally I certainly would have decided against my son being circumcized. A friend of mine first exposed me to the controversy around circumcision, because honestly before that, I never thought twice about it. When my son was born, the midwives and the nurses asked, but none of them ever promoted it, and never took it any further after we said no; which I was thankful for. It was brought up in …	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 12:10 AM
-1	Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised Manslaughter requires that the individual at fault negligently performed an action which lead to the person's death. It is a legal concept, not simply a catchall term for when somebody kills somebody else. Let's say you slipped on a fresh patch of ice, and by some terrible chance it causes you to drop an object in your hands which subsequently strike's a person in the head killing them. You aren't criminally at fault, since nothing you did was particularly negligent. The result of that person's …	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 06:08 PM
3	Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised Seems to me like you have no idea what manslaughter actually is, you just know it is a bad word. "Bad doctor did bad thing so he did bad word.". That is how I imagine your thought process.	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 03:19 PM
-4	Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised I guess everyone failed to consider that lucrative baby foreskin market. I am sure the doctor in the article sells them by the bushell! We should topple his baby foreskin empire!	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 01:55 PM
18	Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised No it definitely is not manslaughter either. It is malpractice if anything.	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 01:45 PM
56	Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised Way to be edgy. Honestly, I can not bring myself to read this kind of bleeding-heart redefinition of a perfectly well and understood legal concept. It is not murder, plain and simple. I have a one-month old baby and we were asked by the midwives and nurses at the hospital if we were going to circumcize. We simply said no. They make you sign all sorts of paperwork outlining any procedures and any complications. The country of Iran has a high circumcision rate; over 80%. I would be willing to bet …	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 10:58 AM
3	Exonerated Rapists are 57% of prisoners released by Innocence Project Well even if they were not rapists, they were convicted rapists, who were innocent.	/r/MensRights	22/06/15 08:48 PM
1	Modern Feminism in America When I was going to school in Finland, I brought up in a class that I saw women-only parking spaces while I was in Luxembourg and found it quite interesting. My female friend, said, "it is normal, we have them in Germany, as well." I said, "Well, howcome?" The teacher jokes, "they are bigger so they don't hit anything.". It was crickets, and all of the girls were glaring at him; which made me laugh pretty hard. There was truth behind what he said, as they were located in the easiest possible pla…	/r/MensRights	07/05/15 11:21 PM
19	As a single father filling out scholarship applications, this frustrates me. If I were you. Single mother? Check. If you have to explain later. Someone in the selection committee might agree with you. If not, fuck em! When my dad raised us, he often fought tooth and nail to get the same benefits as single mothers, because he was a single father. He usually got it. Don't have a box specifically for me? Fuck it.	/r/MensRights	25/04/15 05:09 PM
2	The "manslamming" campaign is literally a campaign for slamming into men and then claiming they slammed into you. If someone bumped into me, an, "excuse me," would suffice if I believed it was mutually accidental or my fault, but if it was intentional, I might choose to ignore it rather than feed that person's obvious need for attention. People who bump into you on purpose are usually crazy; eyes at 12 o'clock keep walking. Maybe the guys thought it was some sort of attempt at flirting or some other stuff, and they just didn't care for her. Where did she do this also? New York City again? Where guys are pro…	/r/MensRights	12/01/15 12:16 PM
10	All men are real men- can't shame us to servitude. Chances are they are against firearms, or any practical method, for self-defense, as well. A lot of the women I know who are into firearms are pretty strong willed and don't fall prey to victim mentalities that most feminists operate under.	/r/MensRights	21/11/14 07:07 PM
22	SJWs bullied scientist Matt Taylor to tears. He apologized for "offending" people by his shirt. I am out of words. But making her cry for her innocent mistake would be an outrage.	/r/MensRights	14/11/14 11:09 PM
17	Teacher gets probation for having sex with student - Students Think It's Too lenient One big factor is not necessarily the age of the student, but the fact that the teacher was in a position of authority.	/r/MensRights	25/02/14 03:37 PM
2	"I'm a girl, we can do that..." It is a right because we say it is, but in reality it is just a privilege which enables you to participate in democratic society. If it were truly a right, that us humans had to express in order to live, then we would exercise it more than we do. If voting was a right, then children would be able to vote, criminals would be able to vote, and mentally handicapped people would be able to vote. That is not the case. The only negative effect that women voters had was introducing a force which made t…	/r/MensRights	21/07/13 08:51 PM
0	Empowering single moms, but at what cost? I would answer by saying. I would love to be as diplomatic as Stephen Fry. I would love to have the work ethic and endurance of a Navvy. I would love the courage in the face of an adversary as a of a WW1 soldier going over the top. etc.	/r/MensRights	04/04/13 12:45 AM
2	Empowering single moms, but at what cost? You are describing yourself through values, which can be universal. But, what I was really asking, was how would you describe yourself through attributes, attitudes, habits, etc., as a man. Which types of male behaviors do you describe yourself with, or admire, which are a reflection of those values? I will use sex/gender as being inseparable in this context since it seems to be the presumption that we're both men, talking about man stuff. In any case, you are right in identifying the, "man up,"…	/r/MensRights	03/04/13 11:27 PM
10	Empowering single moms, but at what cost? Believe it, because it is very important. There's something about being so alike to another creature, where they can say without having to ask, "I understand what you're going through." A mother can never truly empathize with her son's emotional feelings, especially sexual ones, just as a father can never truly empathize with his daughter's emotional feelings. The only advice that could be given would be either based on assumptions from observations, or from general advice given by other women. …	/r/MensRights	03/04/13 10:19 PM
4	Empowering single moms, but at what cost? You invited insult by bringing it up. If you're going to take something as simple as an answer, or retort, as an insult, then you're better off not talking about it. In any case, there are male habitual behaviours that a woman can not teach you. Whether they are socially constructed, or rooted in biology, women have the inability to teach boys how to deal with their emotions, especially sexual ones, as well as other men can. They do not have the personal experience, and the same frame of referen…	/r/MensRights	03/04/13 09:52 PM
2	Empowering single moms, but at what cost? I like to think of it as habitual behaviour which reflect show a man should deal with his emotional responses, and where that is going to lead him psychologically, as an individual, and socially, as a male member of society.	/r/MensRights	03/04/13 09:35 PM
8	Empowering single moms, but at what cost? Well there are things innate to being a male that are unable to be taught by females.	/r/MensRights	03/04/13 09:07 PM
-2	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. It is not the same, at all. Women dress provocatively for many reasons, none of which include a malicious intention to make a man so emotionally disturbed as to cause them to become harmful. It's like blaming a theft victim for having nice things. Existing is not provocating. It is not the fault of women in various societies that men who find them attractive also lack the ability to control themselves. Depending on the circumstances a woman should be taking caution towards her appearance if the …	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 04:26 AM
-3	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. It is not her right to freak the fuck out, it is just her defense response that she has developed for whatever reason. Unfortunately, her right to stand up for herself, and how she chose to act, puts her at odds with the law. She should be charged, of course. However, I think they both have been taught a lesson in politeness (if she gets charged).	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 12:07 AM
-7	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Well, there is a point that women who are physically weaker, aught to have an adequate means to defend themselves against people who would otherwise impose their will on them. The reality is that it is not just women, it is everyone who aught to be afforded that ability. There is no doubt that the human body itself is a deadly weapon. In any case, you are so very right. It is a humanity problem. I think people refuse to acknowledge that it is only in the face of inequality, in which people feel …	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 11:57 PM
-6	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. I disagree in taking the situation out of its context, as if only the actions themselves are important. If only the action itself is what mattered, then it would negate the concept to prove Mens Rea, and people who should not be in jail, would be. He refused to stand down, and he refused to stop acting like a jerk.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 11:24 PM
-6	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. It depends on who starts it. Guy indignant about having to wait, or the woman at the till?	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 11:00 PM
-7	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Stop deluding yourself into think that all violence is bad. It is not. Sometimes it is necessary.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 10:38 PM
-5	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Laws are incentives not to break the law, they do not have any actual control over people's actions. The only way to get people to to abide by the rules, who do not wish to, is to enforce them. There is no expectation that some outside authority will be able to stand up for you if you are on the receiving end of unlawful behaviour, so people must have the natural right to stop it themselves. It is the expectation that people follow the rules, however the rules can not equally apply to every circ…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 10:28 PM
-1	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. The violence happening there is a very different circumstance.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 10:17 PM
-5	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. I would rather live in that world too. However, there is no way to control individuals without stripping them of their rights entirely. Wanting to live in a world without bad people is a Liberal fantasy. Bad people have always existed, and it is likely that they always will exist.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 10:05 PM
-7	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. There are societal rules which people do not follow these days, and that is politeness. People who are courteous, and polite, do not get maced in the face. No level of feeling indignant justifies acting like an asshole. I think the lesson here is: if you are unable to act like a reasonable person, then you should have no expectation to be treated reasonably. It is the Golden Rule, and it dictates people's behaviour more than they realize. Act like a jerk, get treated like a jerk. It is impossibl…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 09:50 PM
-1	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. I have heard that phrase many times, but standing up for oneself is not a wrongful action. If impolite assholes refuse to back down, then a person who feels that escalating the situation physical violence is the only want to stop them on their tirade, then so be it. Not all violence is wrong, some violence is more wrong than other violence. It is not the act itself, but rather the motivation for it; mens rea. Women who dress provocatively are not acting unlawfully, they are doing it to get atten…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 09:38 PM
-6	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. When it comes to exchanging blows, verbally or otherwise, the person acting unlawfully is the person who initiates the confrontation. You can not place all the blame on the woman because she stepped up, and escalated the situation to put an end to it. It is understandable why she reacted, but expecting me to side with the guy who got his comeuppance, instead of the woman who was bullied, get real. What is most ridiculous to me is that people are eschewing the circumstances and framing what happe…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 09:17 PM
-22	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. I do not get what being against the law has to do with it. The legal consequences to these people's actions do not have any weight in regard to what transpired. I find it disconcerting that people are acting as if provocation is meaningless. It is not, and has been justifying many acts of aggression since time immemorial, since it is well-understood that a person can say, or do things, in order to elicit responses which cause others to lose control. In any case, arguing that this is meaningless …	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 09:07 PM
-8	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Exactly. However, it seems as though many people are eschewing the circumstances and treating this as if she did it unprovoked. People are unpredictable, and it would be pertinent to be polite in situations like that, rather than being indignant and continuing the tirade. Nothing justifies battering somebody, but being provoked sure as hell mitigates much of the blame. The standard which people placing on how the woman should have acted is contrary to the standard they are placing on the guy who…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 08:56 PM
-6	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. You can not equate provocation, with an inability to de-escalate. It does not look like he's failing to calm her down, he is obviously trying to rile the girl up. If he wanted to de-escalate the situation, he would have shut up and waited for his turn in line. However, he felt indignant about having to wait, so he continued his verbal tirade. It is not as though he stood idly by, while she continued to be angry at him, and he was standing up for himself. If that was the case, then your presumpti…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 08:30 PM
-6	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Nobody deserves to be assaulted, but the grim reality is that a person's own actions, particularly provocation, can lead to people losing their control and battering others. A, "victim," who provokes their assailant into hurting them is by no means innocent, and are complicit in their own actions. What people seem to think is that the guy did nothing wrong, and did nothing. However, we all know that is not true. He was not randomly targeted by this woman, he was edging her on.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 08:20 PM
-2	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Victim blaming? The man who was maced is not an innocent victim. He is complicit for his own actions. Provocation does not always justify assault, however it sure as hell mitigates the blame placed on the assailant.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 08:00 PM
-34	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. People who are complicit in their own demise aught to bear some of blame. That backwards ass logic that it does not matter applies equally, to men and woman, in my book.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 07:49 PM
-37	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Are you a child? "Sticks and stones can break my bones but words will never hurt me," is not some mantra to live-by. You do not provoke people, and expect to get away with it because you feel you have freedom to use your language to do harm, and upset people. I suppose he could have called her a, "nigger," or a, "cunt," or some combination and variation of the two. Would that be crossing the line, or would she still have had no right to stand up for herself? Some people fight with words, and som…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 05:02 PM
-30	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Not really, no. Male, or female, people should not be provoking other people thinking that there is going to be no repercussions for their actions. But hey what do I know? This is Murcia, where free-speech in the first amendment right gives me the right to be an asshole! Anyone who challenges that right is in the wrong! Period.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 04:43 PM
-31	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. That is all I am trying to point out. The guy was asking for it and underestimated the threat; probably because she was a woman. Hopefully he will not make that mistake again; unless he logs onto Men Rights in order to get validation from his bros that he did nothing wrong and he's the innocent victim. Fuck impolite assholes like him.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 04:33 PM
-116	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. No, I'm not wrong. It is still assault, but to deny that he was provoking her would be absurd. That was my point, not what you imagined me to say. Like what I said about poking a cat, if you poke a cat and the cat lashes back because they are unaware of your intentions and are threatened by you, you shouldn't be blaming the cat for what happened to you. Bringing that into the context of what happened, you can not agitate and provoke individuals expecting them to just put up with your bullshit. T…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 04:23 PM
-48	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. Obviously you are a bad judge of lightheartedness. He was insulting her, by talking back, and laughing at her. That's hardly lighthearted. He was trying to provoke her by continuing his behaviour, when she is clearly agitated. That guy is a prick, and is an idiot for pushing some chick's buttons, thinking she is some sort of joke.	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 04:18 PM
-191	Man and women get into argument in line at gas station, she threatens violence and then maces him when he was only laughing at her overblown anger. I do not see why this is a Men Rights issue. If somebody was standing behind me in line, trying to provoke me like that dude was, I would feel uncomfortable. Assault is wrong, no matter if it is caused by some bird brained chick, or some hot headed dude, but damn, that guy was asking for trouble by being an asshole. He thought that because she was a woman, and not some dude who could pummel him, that he could treat her like a joke. You do not poke a cat until it shreds your hand apart, then blam…	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 04:08 PM
-2	Difference in Resources for Homeless Men and Women in a City in the Midwest I would not say that is what society is saying. However, there's no doubt that many prevailing opinions which make men feel that way. I doubt a useful amount of people are actively motivated to try and prove that point. For that reason, to think of it as some conspiracy, rather than a collection of poorly informed opinion, is rather illogical.	/r/MensRights	20/01/13 10:33 PM
-1	Difference in Resources for Homeless Men and Women in a City in the Midwest Everyone who is disenfranchised will make that claim. Especially when a point of view challenges the status quo. However, they can not expect others to change their way of thinking, who hold opposing views; even in the face of good reason. It is hard to change people's minds. Some people tend lash back against common sense, as being proven wrong is often a greater threat than being wrong. In any case, the more good information that is available, the more it tends to offset bad information. Regar…	/r/MensRights	20/01/13 10:23 PM
-2	Difference in Resources for Homeless Men and Women in a City in the Midwest If anyone is wondering why women get what they need, it is because they want it, and demand it. It is a very immasculine thing to ask for help, and ask to be kept safe. As if it is shameful to act in any way that is not manly. Either stop complaining, or get over the fact that nobody is going to cater to men's needs which are not apparent. Awareness like this, is the first step. The blaming has to stop.	/r/MensRights	20/01/13 09:31 PM
6	Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk? In a contract, if both parties are intoxicated, and both lack the capacity to make a contract, then it is unenforceable. If one party is incapacitated from intoxication, and one is not, then it would be considered an unconscionable for a contract to go through knowing that the other guy is drunk. However, if it is not apparent that the person is incapable of agreement, then the other party can not be blamed for acting unconscionably, and the contract is considered valid. Drunk guys, who take dru…	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 04:14 PM
4	Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk? True, however you are not responsible for the actions of others while drunk. A female who is passed out unconscious, is not responsible for the unconscionable act of rape that occurs when she is incapacitated. She is responsible for incapacitating herself and removing her ability to resist. It still takes an unconscionable act on the part of another person in order for a rape to occur. This is not limited to men vs. women. I had a buddy who was passed out drunk with a girl trying to fuck him at …	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 04:02 PM
1	The younger generation is waking up. In my opinion achieving a true sense of equality means that it must be mutually accepted; between the ones being treated fairly, and the ones being treated unfairly. Regardless of the intended ends, the means are nothing but forced exclusion in this case. It is as every bit as demeaning to the principle of equality as forced inclusion is. Anyone who does not see that, is missing the point. I personally see no need to abolish boys' clubs, or girls' clubs, in the interest of equality. There are ma…	/r/MensRights	05/01/13 02:08 AM
1	6 Habits of Remarkably Likeable People Whip-its? I'll do a whip it.	/r/seduction	05/01/13 01:32 AM
1	“To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.” - Elbert Hubbard Keep in mind that it is very difficult to control your emotions while in the throws of a feeling. You are the hand that holds the gun, and your feelings are the tip of the finger on the trigger. When there is an emotion, the trigger gets pulled, the hammer drops, and the gun powder starts to burn, and the bullet travels down the barrel; the best you can do is trying to control the gun itself, rather than trying undo the action of pulling the trigger. The bullet hitting the mark signifies a healt…	/r/seduction	01/01/13 12:37 AM
2	“To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.” - Elbert Hubbard This is not necessarily true when the criticism is internalized. In order to get criticism from others, it means exposing yourself, flaws and all, to others. You are right though. Any response from others is satisfying, as long as it is not malicious, but you can even get used to that sort of criticism as well. Having somebody not care about something about you is often the best criticism, as it can teach you how you should care about it. It sure beats fishing for compliments and getting empty c…	/r/seduction	31/12/12 04:01 PM
6	“To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.” - Elbert Hubbard It's the most work, however I believe my advice is practical. If you can walk in and out of a bar without spending more than a split second gazing at anyone, your anxiety level will drop quite a bit. Doing this over and over will make you comfortable walking into a joint not looking like you give a shit. The visual stimulus of a pretty girl, or an aggressive patron, is mind fuel and not necessarily helpful if you can not control it. It's just the first step. Eventually you can work on direct eye…	/r/seduction	31/12/12 03:33 PM
11	“To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.” - Elbert Hubbard Just like cold is a lack of heat energy, "confidence," is a lack of anxiety. Anxiety manifests itself in two forms, mental excitation and physical excitation. Trying to control the mind before controlling the body is like putting the milk in the bowl before the cereal; it's not how its meant to work, and it's hard to make it work properly. If you can be relaxed, you can think relaxed. Being relaxed means being mindful of your behaviour. I suggest starting with being mindful of where you direct y…	/r/seduction	31/12/12 01:46 PM