TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hahaz13 Archive

View 1 posts and 78 comments by hahaz13 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
42

hahaz13/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:21 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Actually, he’s right. Neither of them are medical doctors. Both just have doctorates in their respective fields (psychology vs education).
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:34 PM
10

He wasn't fined he was countersued for $1 and he lost because he's a fucking idiot. Anyone with working eyes who saw that picture could tell he's touching her ass, not her rib as he claims. I'm all for equality but I don't think we should be using this guy as our shining example of inequality.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 03:58 PM
55

Its a big steak, but its 1k USD b/c that specific steak is crusted with edible 24k gold. Yeah it's fucking retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 03:24 PM
12

Except there’s already precedent cases where a prenup existed and the courts said “nah we’ll ignore this”. Prenups aren’t an end all solution.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 05:07 PM
5

30 days isn't shit. The healthy measure of weight loss is usually about 1/2 pound to 1 pound loss per week. Get that instant gratification mentality out of your head and even if its disheartening at times, take daily logs/weekly pics and you WILL see progress if you're doing shit right like eating healthy/exercising. Key point being DOING SHIT RIGHT. Keep at it, you got this, get that defeatist shit out of here.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 04:01 PM
107

lmao good luck convincing the state to let a single man adopt a child
/r/MensRights20/03/21 05:26 PM
7

For the u-23/20 teams, those women will have mostly fully matured physically, so not that much different from the USWNT in terms of physical ability. For the u-16 kids, they're literally ONE YEAR OLDER than the u-15 dallas boys. Stop jumping through hoops to explain your argument. Why don't you find me anything about a women's team beating a u-15 team?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:15 PM
21

Sounds like you're jumping through hoops and finding excuses. Or wait, burden of proof something something, all hearsay according to you? I find it quite convenient FC Dallas erased any mention of this friendly from their website. Could have potentially been the USWNT asking out of embarrassment to remove it. But that's just my opinion, same as yours. Here's some actual footage between boys and women's teams. Now I must vigorously apologize as it is not the women's national team, but instead som…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:50 PM
50

I'm all for equal rights and quite rude of you to assume I'm sexist. I'm just pointing out a contradicting statement you made. Yes, I agree regardless of gender, the pay should be based on revenue. The USWNT already has a larger percentage of the revenue so what's the argument? The first person's argument is that the revenue is lacking compared to men because women aren't as good as men. It's an inferior product to say the least. So comparing the performance of genders is inevitable.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:42 PM
42

In 2009, 92 (15-16 year olds) and 93 (14-15 year olds) ODP (Olympic Development Program) boys beat two separate squads of the USWNT 5-1 and 2-1. Granted the women's team was split into two groups of 12 and played against a full squad of 18, but the viewer notes had Hope Solo not made some great saves, the score could have been much higher. No footage on the U-15 FC Dallas boys vs USWNT, just an article detailing the background and a very convenient explanation about how the USWNT took the game n…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:33 PM
107

So...you're saying that skill and ability vastly differs with gender...yet you're arguing for equal pay between genders so that both genders are compensated equally.... Hmmmmm the mental gymnastics on this one
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:22 PM
2

Weiners out
/r/MensRights27/06/19 07:21 PM
6

So physiologically there are normal resting levels of sodium in your extracellular and intracellular spaces. If there is an imbalance the body naturally seeks to restore it by moving water from one side to another. If you know the basics of osmosis you can understand what happens. With a high sodium diet, your extracellular sodium concentration is too high, so to equilibrate, water leaves the intracellular compartment which leads to the bloating that is common with high sodium intake. As for alc…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:58 PM
63

Reading those made my brain hurt. "I strongly believe in the social, political, legal, and economic equality of men and women." (okay good point so far) leading to "Perhaps the real feminist problem here is that I pretty much never ask guys out, because I largely abide by the societal norm that men do the asking out and women do the accepting. Thanks for that, society." (wat) and "Plus, if you think about all the stupid shit we spend money on to make ourselves more attractive to men (hair remova…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 02:56 AM
8

Then do the talk while having a 'squirt gun fight'. There might e some 'collateral damage' from being in the general vicinity.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:23 PM
2

Case in motherfucking point. Granted it'd be a case by case situation but just because you have an erection doesn't mean you want it. When someone's sucking your dick, you're gonna get an erection.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 09:40 PM
32

...was told this by a female manager... Well, there's that.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 08:21 PM
-3

Huh? I really don't understand your overreaction. [Seriously] (http://www.buckeyeinteractive.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/flying-lawnmower.gif). And I have no idea what bs you're talking about that's invading this sub, but if a sub about MEN'S RIGHTS keeps getting filled with stupid petty shit about stupid shit women do like fat acceptance and tumblr posts, then this sub is truly lost. Please, keep posting quality posts that will definitely provide thought provoking discussions.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 09:40 PM
-2

Thank you for assuming that I'm joking or trolling. I know what fat acceptance is, and this isn't fat acceptance. This is one person's stupidly hypocritical opinion.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:50 PM
-1

Yes, but this example only show's one person's retarded thinking on the matter.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:58 PM
-8

What movement...this is one person.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:54 PM
3

Pretty sure by gay she means just the lesbians. Also kind of funny that she just ignores that transexuals can be FTM, not just MTF. But then again, she probably assumes that they're traitors or something.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:24 PM
5

ask me about anarcha-feminism, freeganism, anti-capitalism, anti-fascism, sex-critical radical feminism, LGB issues, gender abolition. I am, in the immortal words of Andrew Bolt, a self-styled anarchist ratbag. Long, essay-type posts are under /tagged/blog. and get fucked you transactivist scumbag. CeCe is a man. Not a woman. Get it into your thick leftist skull. You think you stand for feminism by saying MTF people are women? They’re still men. They’ll always be men. GET FUCKED.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:49 PM
6

Oh Jesus you're right. I do feel sorry for him. Fuck that girl, she even specifically supports only LGB, no T, because since transexuals used to be men, they're still men in disguise, so fuck them...sigh... Again, she's most likely a young person going through their rebellious phase latching onto a cause but it's so sad to see so much hate.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 04:59 PM
5

This is her. You think she has one?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 04:45 PM
50

Fear boners...the worst.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:24 PM
18

This is absolutely FUCKING ridiculous. No excuses whatsoever. How the government does not try to do more for him is appalling. Even if the system is slow in getting his name cleared, at least do some shit like have signed documents stating that he is cleared and his place on the registry is a technicality. Elizabeth Paige Coast. Remember that goddamn name. Matter of fact, feminists keep a registry of men who have been 'proven' /s to be 'rapists' and 'women haters'. Why don't we make a registry o…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:09 AM
3

It's still wrong. Doing something terrible to someone terrible isn't justified. It just makes you also terrible.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:10 PM
3

Thanks for the clarification. But it still shows a lack of information in her explanation.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:35 AM
0

All of my what... Nothing has angered me more than the stupidity of this woman. The fact that she points out large smartphones are sexist to women made me want to punch myself in the face to see if I was actually reading those words. So I'm guessing she assumes that all men are larger than women, and all men have large manly hands to accomodate larger phones. Why buy the phone if it's 'too big'? And as a matter of fact, it's not THAT big compared to other phones? Her model was a Nexus 4, and her…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:53 AM
2

Well, the way it was presented made it seem like it was made by women who believe chivalry is dead IMO. Who else would think of such a stupid premise about how men shouldn't forget to be chivalrous by opening doors and ruining your $200 dollar jacket so a woman doesn't have to step over a puddle?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:53 PM
6

I posted this not only as a mention for men's rights, but just equality in general. Not only does this imply that men be servile to women (offensive to men), but it implies women need the help of men to do simple things like walk over a puddle of water (offensive to women). It's just a stupid premise that somehow made it to release. Like the comments say, it's akin to having a commercial for women saying they should make sandwiches for men.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:17 PM
1

It's a legitimate advertisement. I saw it as prevideo advert for the Warren Farrell protest video. I thought it was a joke at first, too, then I realized they were being serious.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:14 PM
1

Indeed it wasn't. I noticed this as an advert for that video about the Warren Farrell protests.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:13 PM
28

Really Gillette, for a month dedicated to men's health, the focus isn't on men's health, but on being servile to women? This should be offensive to both men AND women, in my opinion, and I'm amazed this was approved.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:23 AM
3

Towards the end of the 2 foot journey with a HUGE /s load on her back, she looked like she was going to faceplant. Nothing against women, but it's not just a 150 pound load. You're going to be wearing 150-200 pounds in gear alone. Granted generalizing women's physical fitness is retarded, and I have a female cousin who graduated from West Point and is serving currently who I know can beat the shit out of me but looks just as skinny/fit as any plain noncombatant. tl;dr I wouldn't trust a woman (o…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 09:24 PM
3

Meanwhile, it took me 10 days to get a hearing in the domestic division of the South Dade Government Center. The restraining order was, of course, dismissed easily. Samantha’s mother admitted she had no proof and was not telling the truth. And, of course, nothing was done about the fact that she perjured herself under oath. From here What in the flying fuck? How is Florida functioning right now when everything involved in their government system is so blatantly corrupted?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:54 AM
7

You never mentioned that it was two different countries...
/r/MensRights18/10/13 07:50 PM
1

Which is why the notary on retainer will have a breathalyzer handy. Person you wish to boink is legally drunk? It's up to you whether or not you wanna take the risk.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:36 AM
1

Which is why you have a notary on retainer on nights you go out. Duh.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:34 AM
2

Just an aside, and I know how ridiculous, yet reasonable this sounds, what would it take legally for every guy to just carry around sheets of paper asking for consent that women are required to sign (and vice versa for the opposite sex/differing sexual orientation, etc.)?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:03 PM
2

What I meant was he would believe that killing his wife would be justifiable to him. I'm not saying it's justified.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 06:27 PM
3

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:00 AM
4

To be frank and although this sounds depressing, he honestly would have nothing to live for, and would be completely 'justified' in doing so, which would be the wrong thing anyway. She took his child, his home, his money, his dignity, his freedom, what else does he have to live for? The courts aren't going to support him so what's stopping him from exploding from the stress and stupidity of the system and murdering his retarded ex wife?
/r/MensRights06/10/13 06:59 AM
1

I mean that's obvious. But do you consider the crimes to be relatively equivalent in terms of jail time? And what do you think about the argument that punishing false accusers discourages women from coming out about actual rape incidents? (personally I think it's a load of horseshit)
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:24 PM
10

My beef isn't just necessarily with the lawyers argument, it's just that the general consensus for people who are against harsh sentences for false accusers is that it'll prevent actual rape victims from coming out because of the fear of going to jail. Which is entirely stupid because I don't recall a case where an actual tape victim was sent to jail for reporting a rape. This is why we get people like the accuser of Brian banks essentially run off with no consequences and sometimes free money. …
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:15 PM
0

Damn. I only just thought about it at an average rate of 30 times a second. Guess I'm not up to par and have to think about sex even more!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:06 PM
43

Her lawyer...ugh. His argument that if they convicted her and put her away, the message would be that if you come forward they'll lock you up. Uh no shit for brains. If you come forward and lied about it, they'll lock you up. On a side note, anyone have any statistics on how often women would lose rape cases compared to successful convictions?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:26 AM
9

She committed the act of lying when she was 17, definitely old enough to be tried as an adult. She was old enough to know the consequences. And it was for SUCH a stupid reason too.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:24 AM
-3

All of my wat...
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:43 PM
2

The one in the middle strikes me as most offensive. How the fuck did Kate in any way have any say in the decision as to what gender her baby was? It's fucking genetics and biology, they have no fucking say. And I'm baffled that these people think Kate is some face for feminism for some shit, especially considering the first time William saw Kate, she was wearing a bikini in a contest objectifying women.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:29 PM
5

I don't remember the exact quote but he did say how hard it was for him to believe that this small attractive young woman could commit such a heinous murder. Which is why they/he pushed against the death penalty.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:19 AM
19

The police are who piss me off the most. I guarantee that they said the case is still ongoing only because the mom got the news agencies involved. They obviously weren't going to follow up on shit. They probably though the kid was having the time of his life. This is what happens when we have people who are clearly not qualified as cops running our justice system. How the fuck was that not a crime?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:07 PM
3

It's paradoxical, because an SRSer who hates men is saying that hating men doesn't exist. wut.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:07 PM
5

The comments are so funny. "A man could never go through natural childbirth! Just saying..." The response? "Very true. Considering they don't have the necessary organs to gestate a fetus, it would definitely be an unnatural birth." lolol
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:59 PM
30

If he had hit someone 30 sec prior, those same white knights would be on his ass. The situation is pretty black and white. Guy bet a lot of money on the match. Things not going too well so he's running his mouth off between points. Old couple next to him ask him to keep it down. He does nothing but say it's my right to say what I want. They argue with him about 'manners' and other stupid shit, then proceed to hit him. When old man assaults the guy and he tries to push him off, old man falls down…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:04 PM
3

$750k actually. The rest went to the lawyers. But still despicable.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:35 PM
8

"I wouldn’t be surprised if you comment on this article — prove me wrong, please." So essentially he/she (I can't tell what gender they are, what kind of a name is Indigo...) is saying, "Here, I'll talk shit about MRA's and MRA's are whiny and annoying especially if they comment on this article. But if they don't it's fine even though I'm going to say how MRA's are retarded". Okay "Indigo". Go back to the color spectrum and be the only color no one really likes because you're just a shade of pur…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:08 AM
11

What he meant to say with is that men are more efficient at killing themselves, and may not be doing it sometimes for attention, as is often common with some women. But you are right in that male suicide statistics are not accurate because men are afraid they might be labeled as pussies for trying to commit suicide. A typical example of skewed female suicide statistics, when I was an EMT, a high school girl ran away in her parents' car after 'swallowing' a bottle of pills because her high school…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:32 PM
30

Still not equivalent to being dead.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:33 AM
2

Yeah, because everyone knows writing in the Wall Street Journal, a publication obviously known to be read by the common feminist, will bring about change and equality. /s But yes, his analogy was off. I was confused as well. The other main problem, as pointed out by others in this thread, is that she would not have reacted/thought this way if she did not have a son and if anything, if she had had a daughter who was the false accuser, she would be in total support of it still.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:49 PM
2

Right in the [feels] (http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m63m4wJhyK1ryvjfro2_500.gif)
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:32 PM
12

I wouldn't be surprised if they still didn't take the man's side. Cops tend to be very alpha male type personalities who think any man should be able to handle that kind of situation, regardless of whether the woman is the aggressor. They'd just do nothing and call him a pussy behind his back.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:04 PM
1

But that's not the point. Pretend he wasn't doing this water fast, and that he was an actual male who needed heart screenings, but wasn't able to afford them. That's the issue.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 10:17 PM
-1

Well it's too late for that 'simple' solution. The media enjoys vilifying accused male rapists. And the public enjoys the attention so when they have a chance to meet him in public, they can shame him. It's always going to be impossible in the modern era of technology to keep the accused person's identity anonymous. Some dumbass somewhere looking for some money will give up the info to the press, leading to the kind of exposure we see here. Sad, really. Hopefully he's innocent, because if not, h…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:21 PM
3

Only way 4 attractive women would rape a guy is if they're crazy. And we all know to never stick our dicks in crazy.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:04 AM
6

These guys probably just read the headlines. They just assume it was four average girls who raped this guy at worst, and at best four 'hotties'. If they actually read the story, they would have realized that the accused rapists were 4 women, all of whom were about 5'4'' and over 200 pounds. I doubt they'd voice the same concern if they knew this, which is sad.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:15 PM
3

Not denying that. My point was sarcastic in that they obviously look like they have absolutely no training whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:14 AM
18

Life sucks. The way private universities and scholarships set up themselves, they aim towards ethnic diversity (aka white male need not apply). Lately this has also applied to the Asian community (the top UC's consist of a huge majority of Asians because there is no discrimination in applications for public schools whereas top private schools like Harvard have a more balanced student body because they make sure ethnic 'quotas' are fillled). The original purpose of this was to allow minorities fr…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:08 AM
2

Yes, it's all on video. But if he were to retaliate, and if they were smart, they would delete all video evidence, and play it up as they tried to peacefully detain him and he fought back, causing them injury. Who do you think the judge and jury will listen to? The man accused of a crime? Or three women who tried to arrest him?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:39 AM
5

Feminism.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:37 AM
5

Not if SRS and women's rights activists decide to involve themselves unfortunately... The sad truth is double standards will definitely come into play.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:36 AM
4

Oh hell no. Why the fuck would you EVER want them to be PAID for this shit? Youtube videos are enough thank you.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:34 AM
5

They were supposedly former cops/corrections facility officers. Whatever the hell that means. They could have been traffic cops or juvenile facility workers for all that matters.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:31 AM
5

They likely never will. I'm pretty sure these women vet their potential cases looking for ones that are nonviolent in nature, and involve people who don't seem like they would fight back.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:28 AM
1

Oh I completely agree, this isn't justiceporn. This is just an overreaction on both parties. But he never actually assaulted her before punching her in the face (although that may have been a typo/confusion on my part in reading). To be fair, the video is misleading as to how it got to that situation in the first place. I'm assuming when he tried to arrest them, they immediately caused a scene going WTF JAYWALKING?!?!?, which was the bad first move on their part.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:26 AM
1

If anything, he hit her because she was getting in the way of an arrest, which he had every right to do. No one ever gets arrested for jaywalking, but it's still illegal and up to the discretion of the officer whether or not an arrest should be made. They made it worse by causing a scene.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:58 AM
11

call maury paternity test find out you're not the father profit But in all seriousness, lawyer up and paternity test that shit.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter