hairloop27 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Got white knighted yesterday We can't, this is why politicians don't talk about ethics or determinism. I know it doesn't feel comfortable to accept moral relativism because we like to think that right and wrong are concrete things and thus guide our actions with those judgements, but they're still just judgements. Its not an argument for anarchy though because we can identify certain actions as worth preventing, but that doesn't mean we have to identify the perpetrator as an immoral alien; it just means that we have to cond…	/r/MensRights	17/03/13 08:44 PM
1	Got white knighted yesterday Actions are just manifestations of beliefs, most people don't choose what to believe, it's taught to them and they just assume that they're doing the right thing. That's a good example there, but no I would not judge them; I would judge their views. Clearly if someone goes out of their way to attack me based on a moral obligation, they are very passionate about being morally good. As Socrates would say, evil is just misguided good. I realize my viewpoint is controversial, but Ive written a fair …	/r/MensRights	16/03/13 09:16 PM
1	Got white knighted yesterday I would say that about anything.	/r/MensRights	16/03/13 08:41 PM
1	Got white knighted yesterday Unless blaming both parties is wrong. It's unfair to judge someone for their beliefs, only judge the beliefs themselves. We're all trying to be good and morally right, so the fact that some people have found less defensible arguments then ours shouldn't matter. The white knight tried to be just and ethical, so judging him for that is immature. Feminists are trying to make women's lives better which is A GOOD THING, they just don't see the big picture. Let's not make this a hate zone.	/r/MensRights	16/03/13 08:11 PM
3	Suggesting that biological differences between the sexes could make one sex, on average, superior to the other in specific ways is perfectly fine only if women are on the winning side. I agree. Men and women have significant hormonal differences, so why would they not tend to develop separate traits? I would never suggest that a woman has to be nurturing and dainty, and a man has to be strong and technical, but evidently both sexes have their tendencies.	/r/MensRights	04/03/13 02:35 AM
7	Suggesting that biological differences between the sexes could make one sex, on average, superior to the other in specific ways is perfectly fine only if women are on the winning side. I could state the opposite and say that this proves society perceives men as superior, but we feel the need to constantly pander to the under-dog or else be called prejudiced. I think feminist hypocrisy is largely caused by insecurity, their knee-jerk reactions are indicative of this. Most feminists I meet like to dismiss misandry as a myth, I think because they think the two problems are opposed. It's unfortunate that everyone can't just look at their causes and realize that everyone is seeking…	/r/MensRights	27/02/13 10:21 PM
4	Equality at its finest. It's unfortunate because the feminists who are advocating equality don't want to abandon the title of feminism, while the loonie sexists keep calling themselves feminists, so the group has become polarized. I believe that one of the best responses from feminists is defending mens rights because it reverses the gender stereotype that men are the strong protectors and women are the damsels in distress.	/r/MensRights	25/02/13 04:18 PM
6	Penn & Teller: Bullshit! - Cheerleaders. A brilliant example of how feminism hurts women as well. You didn't even watch the video, they want cheerleading designated as a sport. They are pro-safety, not con-sports.	/r/MensRights	24/02/13 04:00 PM
0	Made this after reading the Marine cuckold story below. Go to /r/funny then.	/r/MensRights	24/02/13 01:09 AM