TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hallashk Archive

View 6 posts and 61 comments by hallashk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This is episode S07E09 of Parks and Recreation.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:21 PM
2

Which episode is it? The most recent one?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:29 PM
1

Some people don't like labels. I'm not one of those people.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 02:17 PM
1

Quite well. But that's just because I've only told the ones that I knew would take it quite well.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 10:36 PM
1

4 of them do, the ones with open minds. I'm not keeping it a secret, but I'm also not advertising it, yet. There's a big social stigma, and I'm ashamed to admit that my friendships are more important to me than my beliefs.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 10:28 PM
2

a great youtube channel She was the first one to get me interested in the MRM. I've seen every one of her videos. She's amazing. please edit the link to manboobz's website, it's like Dishonest Quote-Mining Central I know. I used to believe that Farrell advocated for incest, and thought rape was exciting. That site is a horrible misrepresentation of the MRM. I put it there for context.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 10:23 PM
1

Sorry. My bad. I should have given myself a refresher on the rules.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:10 AM
1

http://www.folkpartiet.se/ http://www.smedjan.com/etta.asp?sida=view_comment&entry=147 Secondly, Ayaan is a feminist. She is currently being congratulated for her work in promoting women's rights.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:10 AM
2

The BJS one is the one I cite most often. It is much more of a "here's what we did well, here's where we need to improve" piece. It shows that stranger rape is rare, while acquaintance rape is common, dispelling that myth that only strangers rape. It shows that reporting rates have gone down sharply, so that's something we need to work on. It shows that most of the rapes happen in the home, dispelling the myth that it usually happens on the street. It shows that most rapists are single offenders…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:05 AM
2

There is no decent study on Male Vicitimization for rape. For female victimization, the Bureau of Justice Statistics is the most reliable: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvsv9410.pdf For something more alarmist, you could look at the CDC's Study: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf For sexual violence by sexual orientation, this study is quite good: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_sofindings.pdf
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:12 PM
9

Many mental illnesses are more prevalent in men than women, and many are more prevalent in women than men. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_disorders_and_gender That said, 10x is an obvious exaggeration. It depends on your border definitions (Where you draw the line between "Psychopath" and "Healthy"). By most borders, men are twice to three times as likely to be measured as having Antisocial Personality Disorder. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735801001258
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:44 PM
2

that stat comes from RAINN, it's been debunked Do you have a link to someone debunking it? I have personally thought this stat seemed extraordinarily low.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:00 AM
1

Can you guys help me find a somewhat modern study or statistic that accurately shows how common false rape is. Short answer, no. The problem is that the studies differ wildly. Kanin's 41% may have been accurate for his city, but generalizing it to the world is problematic. Larger sample sizes suffer from poorer investigative techniques. If you're looking for a really good meta-study, that examines all of the studies, and explains the problems with them, then I'd strongly recommend Rumney 2006. Y…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:49 AM
1

I don't really know if I'm up to it right now. I've been taking an emotional beating regarding my controversial views on sexism in STEM. Probably could have kept my views to myself. You can post it though, as long as you remove the links to AVfM.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 10:32 PM
1

D'aww. Cuddles and love to you too! You're welcome!
/r/MensRights05/07/13 11:29 AM
1

Your arguments for why feminism is bad work equally well for why humans are bad. 18% of all people in the US identify as feminists. I have no doubt that there are feminist rapists, child molesters, and murderers. It doesn't mean that they're all like that. Do you have citations of laws NOW is trying to pass that are anti-men?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:08 AM
1

That's odd. Like I said, I'm no moderator, but I've found that disagreeing with him, even mocking him. 6 days ago I made a post about his moderation policy. It's the only post I've made with the word "douchebag" in it. Shouldn't be hard to find.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:25 AM
2

Well, the idea is that anyone can ask a question in AskFeminists, and then feminists answer the question. I prefer the way AskMen does it, but it seems like a reasonable rule.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:49 PM
3

He broke forum rules by making a top-level comment, (not related to upvotes), see the Text Post for a graphical explanation. He wasn't banned for his questions. He's allowed to make questions, and respond to comments, but he's not allowed to make "root" comments, directly responding to the question.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:48 PM
2

No. Him and I get into many heated arguments. I can't link to any due to MensRights sub rules, but if you look through my history for posts responding to him, you'll find them. You don't need to go back more than a week.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:45 PM
1

I prefer the way AskMen does it, but the idea is that you're asking a question to feminists, so feminists should answer the question.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:42 PM
1

I'm not a moderator, just a user. I don't really know what those questions were. I would support a ban if a young account asked something like, "Why are all you fucking feminists' cunts?" But again, I really don't know who has all been banned.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:41 PM
2

How do you or r/feminists justify an attack on an individual or group? I don't justify attacks on people or groups. I don't attack people or groups, I find it anti-constructive. Do you mean how do I define an attack? Well, argumentum ad hominem is the main example, for instance: "Fuck you bitch!" "Your just an ugly cunt." "Feminazi slut." Whereas allowed language might be: "There have been many studies proving gender symmetry in domestic violence, here's three [Citation] [Citation] [Citation]" "…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:37 PM
2

What about in cases where it is feminist organizations or popular feminists we call out on their lies? It's fine if the organization is provably lying. For instance, if you said, "the NSA lied about monitoring our communications", that's fine. If you say, "all women are cunts", that's not fine. If we are not able to point out how feminism is a flawed subject via pointing out gaping holes in the statistics they use what are we expected to do? As a scientist and active member of AskFeminists, I po…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:30 PM
1

That's the whole point of this post. The whole point.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:05 AM
1

I guess I don't know how many people have walked away, or just been vanished. NSA style.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:42 AM
3

I disagree all the time. I'm not allowed to link to my posts, but if you read back a week, I contest that there is an epidemic of violence against women, I say that the gaming industry isn't mysogynist for its sexism, I talk about male criminalization, DV symmetry, problems within feminism, AVfM, I critique the mod policy at AskFeminists, and more. And that's just in the past week. I've not been banned.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:06 AM
1

Yes. Thanks, but I'm fine. It's complicated. Happy fourth.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:55 AM
1

Yes, well....my emotions surrounding the event are...complicated. Anger plays a role, but it's a minor one. It was a life-changing event though, I'll give it that.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:48 AM
-1

Nah, I'll just wait a few days. Nothing wrong with waiting a few days. Don't get upset based on things asshole feminists say, they're assholes, and not representative of the normal feminist. If they insult you personally at AskFeminists, you can report them to the mods. For the victimization...it's complicated, but I...I don't know. It's...complicated. I'm sorry. I don't really want to get too into it with an "internet stranger", but thanks for your sympathy.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:20 AM
-2

Anti-feminists are welcome, even encouraged to the sub. That is the sub's whole purpose. Just don't be rude. As long as you attack points of view, and not people, you should be fine.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:09 AM
0

I come here daily. Have been doing so for months now. I'm well versed in your movement. I've watched like 30 of GWW's videos. I don't agree with her anti-feminist stance, but she is very informative and scientific, which I, as a scientist, heavily appreciate. That said, I wasn't actually talking about discussion here, I was talking about discussion on AskFeminists. There's been lots of discussion around how feminism is defined.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:07 AM
1

Oh derp. If your post gets deleted (I deleted it, not the mods), then you can't post for a day or two. Remind me in a couple days and I'll post this. Or you can try it. I don't think it would be banned. Take out the part about personal victimization unless you were also victimized 1.5 years ago. 1.5 years ago, I was raped by a woman. It took me about 8 months to even realize it, and when I tried to look at how common it was, I found that we really have no idea. Studies use gendered definitions t…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:03 AM
1

Wait! It mentions AVfM. That's against sub rules. I deleted it myself just now. Sorry. I'll edit the image, remove the link, and repost.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:49 AM
1

I posted it. I can't link to it here, but you should see it in my username's post. This is kind of interesting science.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:48 AM
1

I'll admit they aren't "IRL", but /u/demmian, /u/turiyag, and /u/Carcel are all common posters on AskFeminists, who all care about men's issues. Feminists just tend to see men's rights on the same level as "white rights". It's not that they don't believe that white people have issues, but that the focus should be on the less privileged.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:27 AM
-1

That's a question for demmian. I PM'd him today, asking if he wouldn't mind setting it up like that. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:22 AM
-2

I'm sorry. I would link you to posts where I question feminism, but I'm not allowed. I'm sorry I can't get more specific than that. I've made plenty in the past week. Look for big long posts with lots of URLs in them. Or am I misunderstanding you?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:52 AM
-5

Look at my posts there. I question feminism all the time.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:40 AM
0

Yeah, /u/RoyalAzure called me a concern troll. What other subs/sites would you recommend to get perspective? PM'd Celda, apparently Celda doesn't self-identify as feminist, so they can't post at the top level. You do though, right? You call yourself feminist? Do you meet the demmian criteria of feminist excellence posted here? http://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1h2mfn/how_do_you_feel_about_the_mhrm_and_mens_issues/carn8c5 Fundamentals of feminism – a person/group qualifies as feminist…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:36 AM
3

Nono, my facts and logic REGULARLY hurt people's feelings. I just don't go after specific people. For instance, I'll say "41% of rape accusations are false", instead of "I think you're lying about your rape victimization". Or I'll say, "most feminists have not visited MRM spaces, so they don't have a good understanding of the movement", instead of "you're just being a whiny bitch, get fucking educated".
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:15 AM
-2

Whoa, you were banned from top-level? That's not cool. I wonder about Celda... I do wish that it was more open, even to anti-feminists and vulgar people. Mostly, I wish that there was more than one person moderating the forums. It's too much concentration of power.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:05 AM
5

There are entire subreddits devoted to insulting demmian for his pro-MRM views. I can think of 4 off the top of my head, none of which I'll link to.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:00 AM
0

There's been some interesting discussion about this in the past couple days. /u/turiyag posted about it. I can't link to the actual post, but if you search his/her username, you'll find it.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:59 AM
0

I think the subreddit doesn't so much enforce viewpoints, so much as it enforces kindness and respect. If your viewpoint is unkind and disrespectful, then you are "censored", I suppose. Hardly counts as fascist.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:57 AM
0

I'm not allowed to link to other subs, or posts in them, but look at /u/demmian's posts (the moderator). He gives warnings to everyone, but only one warning.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:25 AM
-3

Fascism refers to a unified totalitarian state, filled with righteous conviction and a powerful militant majority. Feminism isn't uniform by any stretch of the imagination. We are constantly in disagreement. There's anti-MRM feminists, pro-MRM feminists, sex-positive feminists, sex-negative feminists, feminists who hate trans people, feminists who hate feminists who hate trans people, we disagree on what objectification means, on what is sexist, on what is misogynist, and of course, above all, o…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:24 AM
-2

I don't think it's fascist to have responses to questions asked in "Ask Feminists" to come from feminists. I think /u/demmian could have done a better job of describing what a top level comment is, and I think there should be Flair so that non-feminists can share their ideas as well.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:18 PM
-4

He posted top level comments to his own questions. Also, how do you justify the rule? I actually personally disagree with the rule. I think that AskMen does it better with Flair. The rule actually prevents me from posting at the top level, as I do not self-identify as feminist. That said, I believe in any subreddit, rules are up to the mods. While living under my father's roof, I had to follow his rules, even if I thought they were stupid. We discussed a few rules (ex. Curfew, Bedtime) and they …
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:06 PM
0

He did break the top level comment rule, by commenting on his own question. Alex saw that as a way to express his viewpoint, and I believe it was not a malevolent act, but simple misunderstanding. The mods messaged him, but the message was lost in miscommunication. /u/demmian always gives exactly one warning to people. Usually he posts directly in response to their comment, not a PM. One example: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1hkx4g/what_is_rape_culture_and_why_do_feminists_belie…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:43 PM
-5

Hey GWW, First of all, I really do appreciate your videos. Your one on male disposability was excellent, and really did change my view. I really appreciate your scientific and measured approach in your critiques. That said, he wasn't blocked due to his viewpoints. I express MRA-like viewpoints all the time there, and I have not been blocked. /r/AskFeminists is designed such that you ask a question, and then it gets answered by feminists, and then those answers can be discussed by anyone. A top l…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:08 PM
-2

He was blocked not for his questions, language, or differing opinion. /r/AskFeminists is designed such that you ask a question, and then it gets answered by feminists, and then those answers can be discussed by anyone. A top level comment isn't the comment with the most upvotes, it's a comment in direct response to the question. I made a diagram below to explain. Question by anyone -->Reply by Feminist ---->Reply by anyone ------>Reply by anyone ---->Reply by anyone -->Reply by Feminist He broke…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:05 PM
-2

He was blocked not for his questions, language, or differing opinion. /r/AskFeminists is designed such that you ask a question, and then it gets answered by feminists, and then those answers can be discussed by anyone. A top level comment isn't the comment with the most upvotes, it's a comment in direct response to the question. I made a diagram below to explain. Question by anyone -->Reply by Feminist ---->Reply by anyone ------>Reply by anyone ---->Reply by anyone -->Reply by Feminist He broke…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:05 PM
-2

He was blocked not for his questions, language, or differing opinion. /r/AskFeminists is designed such that you ask a question, and then it gets answered by feminists, and then those answers can be discussed by anyone. A top level comment isn't the comment with the most upvotes, it's a comment in direct response to the question. I made a diagram below to explain. Question by anyone -->Reply by Feminist ---->Reply by anyone ------>Reply by anyone ---->Reply by anyone -->Reply by Feminist He broke…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:05 PM
1

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:10 AM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:02 PM
2

Do you have citations for your claims? Not saying they're false, just asking for the science behind it.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:35 PM
1

http://www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/compare/google-vs-sex No surprises.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:11 AM
1

[Citation Needed]
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:07 AM
1

Agreed. All of the feminists I know would definitely think the author is stupid. Feminists aren't a contiguous group. Some are idiots, but most are nice people.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:26 PM
1

With /u/Clausewitz1996 on this one. That's actually pretty offensive.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter