TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hallowedbe_99 Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by hallowedbe_99 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Depends on how tall. 1D members were usually around the 5'9-5'10 range IIRC, so I don't think they'd stand out as tall usually. If they were NBA tall, say 6'7 or 7'0, then you'd expect women to notice that, but if it was just around 6'0 or lower then maybe they'd be found attractive but usually not to the point of major adulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 06:00 PM
2

Yeah, personality is often relative. What other people care more about isn't your personality, it's typically about the level of chemistry between the two of you, and how you make them feel about their own lives. Typically, people will make significant judgements about others from things like first impressions and general vibes, without actually knowing your personality. Sociopaths have often taken advantage of this, by putting on a barely-convincing, grandiose facade which people get hooked on …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 07:11 PM
15

Nobody's saying that both genders act the exact same. OP is just saying that women can act more cold and selfish because they have more opportunity. I'm not entirely sure that women do actually act more selfish, often they're more outgoing and more concerned about other people's feelings. But it's true that the average woman is in higher demand, and therefore will have higher standards, even if the standards are sometimes based on male gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 12:11 PM
33

What's even worse is that many people will criticize 'nice guys' for thinking that being nice will attract women, and then turn around and advise them to be nice male feminists to get a woman because their dating struggles must stem from not being nice enough. Both patriarchal ideology and many feminists will present female mating choice as a 'reward' for being a good person, and use dating advice as a platform for moral guidance. With this kind of conflicting advice, it's not surprising that yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:21 PM
7

You can't conceive of any situation where a person could be bad at sex, other than because of penis size? WTF. It's entirely possible for people to not enjoy sex, and say so. It's not a euphemism for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 02:09 PM
–

Obviously, in all moral panics, people tend to look for scapegoats and sinister figures who are leading the youth astray. Could be Satanic cultists (Satanic Panic), Soros, Socrates corrupting the youth, violent video games, or rappers who use bad words. It's just a more accessible way to make simple, sensational headlines and stories out of complex, multi-faceted issues. Most young men who turn to 'redpillers' are probably doing so due to their own experiences, rather than being blown away by so…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:44 PM
1

In all fairness, males are still typically expected to take the initiative, approach and express interest. It's definitely true that, especially due to social media, people can become used to continual attention and stimulation and therefore less open to others. The pandemic worsened that, and I'm sure that many young men have had difficulties after that experience. But I don't think you're likely to get much luck convincing men to give less compliments to women. A lot of them are lonely and jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 09:56 PM
0

You seem to be unaware of why people might not take it well when you compare women to dogs, who are kept as pets and need 'manuals and strategies for dealing with them.' Especially since, in patriarchal societies, women were often confined to the home and treated like troublesome pets. Maybe be more careful with your analogies. However, given that your argument is 'women aren't a monolith, but...', I think your choice of analogy here might well betray how you actually see the matter. There's not…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 08:44 PM
24

Wouldn't redpillers classify most dating manuals and advice as 'bluepilled'? Generally, the 'bluepill' isn't a specific doctrine, it's a label used to classify 'ordinary' thinking which isn't redpilled or blackpilled. Most dating books will obviously fit into that camp, because it's how most people think about dating. Even things like Mark Manson 'Models,' which redpillers sometimes recommend, has a lot of bluepilled elements. But it might depend on what you count as a 'manual.' Typically, datin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 07:02 PM
0

Women aren't dogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:31 PM
6

Strictly speaking, ascetics and celibates weren't just 'kept out of society.' Due to the priesthood, papacy and Catholic Church, they actually had considerable social power. The importance those societies placed on asceticism led to significant social roles that were reserved for celibates, as well as to the spread of monasteries, nuns and monks. This is partially due to the early history of Christianity, which preached renunciation and criticized the decadence of the rich and powerful in antiqu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 06:18 PM
–

It sounds like a good quality, but a necessary caveat to keep in mind is that many of these incels want a woman to desire them because they associate that with social status. They idealize 'Chads' and associate them with being 'desired' by women, so their talk about being 'desired' often comes across as wanting to not just have sex but become a 'Chad' and thus (according to them) the apex of social status. Elliot Rodger, for example, often treated women as a status symbol which he deserved, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 08:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter