TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hankhankhank Archive

View 0 posts and 224 comments by hankhankhank on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

thing is if women defile property and terrorise the streets people will want to know why and how can they fix this great problem. if men took to the streets with all that violence there'd be a small massacre, and maybe a news piece the next day on inherent male violent tendencies
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:24 PM
2

theres also a lot of social standing with those professions. no one respects a coal miner
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:28 PM
5

true, that is a little weird
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:05 PM
20

i disagree. there is nothing inheritly perverted about the naked human form, it's something we all have and will always have. when you reserve nudity to the realm of the perverse you encourage wild associations of shame and deviancy. i'm of the mind that a good reason male sexuality is so ugly and demonised is a symptom of this kind of puritanical thinking. before people think i'd willingly let people strip down in front of my hypothetical children i am not against a degree of modesty. nudity is…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:47 PM
9

a man is always a rapist
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:53 PM
3

hold on there my colonialist brother, are you suggesting i'm not at this very moment whipping my field negros? also, while i'm in agreement with your observations that there doesn't seem to be a strong willed male between the lot of them, isn't our role here to discuss and garner compassion for those failed by the system rather than ridicule? these fucking morons as you put it might not be shing beacons of rational thought but to write them off as quickly as a whip strikes flesh is a little call…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:36 PM
1

they are men first, gays second
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:10 PM
4

if you don't get the joke i'm going to punch you in the mouth
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:09 PM
6

ok well done you've arranged a strawman and torn it down, but really this would be better recieved in menrants. it adds nothing to the subreddit dude
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:56 PM
29

i get it trapped in doors constantly, and every now and again i have to get the scraper i use to de-ice my car with and scrub all the sewage from it. 2/10 would not be born with again
/r/MensRights05/04/14 10:34 AM
1

they were asked if there was a cut in the sexual harassment done by them if anything
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:54 PM
20

so based
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:03 AM
8

hitler's body was made up mostly of water. you don't drink water do you?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:26 PM
22

no such thing as reverse sexism bud, it's just plain old sexism. don't buy into the doublespeak and don't buy their sexist donuts.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:18 PM
6

Cap'n, I be spyin' the USS CIS SCUM off the port!
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:56 PM
1

well he's probably the son of some influential ice cream truck salesman. your run of the mill solider would be lucky to get a cone.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:54 AM
9

what the gif doesn't show is that the ice cream factory expects him to die on the field of battle for its interests against other ice cream factories and the extra scoops are his incentive and reward.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:39 PM
17

nobody ever thinks it could happen to them
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:20 PM
3

he would also be forced to continue paying while incarcerated, with any missed payments increasing his jail time.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 07:40 AM
39

it's the scraggly neckbeards that most people reference when they mention the beard. funny since the shaming of inability to cultivate a secondary sexual characteristic is some textbook gender policing along with the lonely basement dweller stereotype. nice inclusion they've got there.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:51 AM
1

i think the spacing could be tighter, if you take /r/askmen as an example of the perfect spacing, you can fit 3 submissions with their CSS in the space it takes for 2 for /r/MensRightsMeta besides that i think it's ok, i certainly didn't think i needed changing (rabble rabble i hate change) but a new set of clothes is always a nice prospect. the sterile grey background seems a bit off, maybe the colour needs tweaking but beyond that i have no constructive criticism
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:25 PM
4

thank you based YAC, once again you manage to put into words all the jumbled ideas and frothing frustrating in my head. keep it up mate.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:22 PM
30

add in the risks he would've faced in prison, where the real rape culture is. child molesters are some of the highest risk prisoners - chances are the least he would've suffered during his sentence was severe battery. death by inmate is always on the table for these types of prisoners.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 01:32 PM
3

man i just read through that article by YAC, very insightful, thanks for linking it. thanks to YAC for writing it too, i'm 7 months behind on that one it seems.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:49 PM
1

can i buy googlebonds with this :p
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:32 PM
5

i think reddit mod's power is often overestimated. being a mod of a subreddit is like being a dog with a cute jacket in a group of other dogs. i mean sure that jacket is heaps of neat, but man you're still liable to eat poo
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:16 AM
2

this sub has been rife with low-effort reposts and clickbaits for a while now, i doubt it'll get any better without some coordinated effort.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:18 AM
1

Game is hard.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:26 PM
35

boys are children too. also the "type" of human most suited to rough times has a higher rate of survival during extreme crisis? cool. to be petulant for a moment here i'd like to take a hillary clintonesq spin on this. men have always been the primary victims of natural disasters. they lose their wives, their daughters, their sisters and their mothers.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:07 PM
29

also what does he gain from "trapping" a woman with this? "haha i gotcha now bitch, i lied! now i'm gonna be liable to provide for this little shit for 18 years! surprise!"
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:23 PM
3

to piggyback on this comment, it's also preaching to a choir. most people who identify with MRA issues know full well women aren't wonderful. all these low-hanging fruit posts do is lay the foundations of an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:42 PM
16

/r/mensrants pls these low content posts are becoming more and more frequent and serve as nothing but a nudge, wink and a "i know right?". they're the karmabait of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:36 PM
2

please use np. links!
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:20 PM
1

question. under obama's medical program can a male-to-female receive free shit?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 01:19 PM
1

it just looks better!!!
/r/MensRights21/11/13 01:18 PM
7

i believe it was. some of our swedish speaking attendees are often quick to tell us how most of these whacky swedefem laws are by insane (even by their standards) fringe groups with little support.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 11:16 AM
2

we've all got whacky names here; i take it as part of the charm
/r/MensRights15/11/13 11:26 PM
5

as far as i know he's involved with the sceptic community in and around youtube and other things. from what i can gather he rejected atheism+ (the feminist shell for the sceptic community) and is really articulate about his reasoning and why. he's also very critical of feminism itself and has a few videos concerning it. i'd say if you're interested on the effect feminism has on institutions outside of gender politics, are a sceptic yourself or just enjoy dulcet british men speaking at length abo…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:53 PM
6

please don't link to the site directly. you're just giving them views. plus cracked was flagged with malware a few days ago.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:58 PM
8

what gets its wings when a man controls his emotions?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 04:53 PM
4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez_VFjjrdy0
/r/MensRights15/11/13 04:26 PM
9

i enjoy rogan and his podcasts. he likes to keep impartial which leads to his flip floppery on some of the more racy subjects, and the rambling fluidic nature of the podcast means issues rarely get hashed out, the stats and facts get lost a bit in the whirlwind. overall though it's insightful as it can be for what is basically a recorded conversation. i believe ms kasparian converses a lot with the atheist communtiy on youtube, i think thunderf00t had a conversation with her at length about the …
/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:50 PM
2

also the site structure keeps things fairly disorganised. it's easy to spread misinformation and the culture that breeds there is argumentative and aggressive so you can easily just derail a thread with an image.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:34 PM
1

it's a pretty short article i agree, there's not much substance there. i can see him just getting a little frustrated one day and typing up what amounts to a blog post and publishing it. whether or not he chases that frustration to its source and learns a few things is up to him or not.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 04:19 AM
1

i have no knowledge of judaism in any of its forms so i can't speak to the truth of the author's claims in that regard, but i can relate to his woes of feeling unnecessary and unwanted. i think that's the main issue he has with it, and maybe judaism no longer patting male adherents on the head is a factor here, but his use of the phrase men only have obligations speak what he feels very clearly. according to mr. woolf, men have become bicycles in feminist veins of judaism, and the fish are makin…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 04:09 AM
1

i've seen it happen. you won't see it here because this sub is a little more restrained with its shaming tactics (or so i'd like to believe) but i've definitely witnessed in tact men being dismissed and shamed like you said you were. of course until i can provide empirical sources it's all just up the air as anecdotal. but i never said it was bad. you're a person. you matter. the messages you received demonising you and shaming you are not reflective of the debate around circumcision, only shitt…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 01:32 AM
5

see that's the difference. no one in their right mind is going to hate you for your circumcision, but your attitude towards it. being glad you were circumcised, liking it... that sorta stuff really has nothing to do with the uproar about the procedure and all it does is just act to dismiss any discourse surrounding it. you inject your anecdotal experience into a topic that is already couched in a lot of misinformation, denial and bitterness. you'll get knee jerk reactionaries in any line of disc…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 01:02 AM
6

looks better might've been a poor choice of words. maybe looks familiar might've been better.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:57 AM
10

i think frontloading an opinion like that is passive aggressive and it shapes the tone of whatever discussion will be had afterwards. it smacks of false social-truth bravery. you shield whatever you say after the fact by basically inb4'ing on any disagreement or opposition. presumptuous, definitely. twisting words, maybe.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:54 AM
1

the article's comments are telling. something i've experienced myself when speaking my thoughts, feelings and reasons for rejecting feminist systems and institutions. they're conflating mr. woolf's proclamation of why men are quitting conservative judaism with some need to subjugate women. the dichotomy posed by a few of the comments ignores the articles finishing words entirely and insist that men are quitting because they don't feel special (think about the menz). it really is disgusting how t…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:15 AM
23

no one in their right mind here is gonna hate you for being circumcised.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:04 AM
20

it's a pretty textbook example of females invading male space. the more movember because vogue the more there will be a counter-push against it. they cannot interlope into movember because the core is designed around facial hair, which few women can grow, so they'll dismantle it.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:08 PM
1

Have you used Proxtube?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:41 PM
-9

No humour allowed, back into the hatred chamber. rabble rabble something women rabble rabble my feelz
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:40 PM
5

i've noticed it in a few threads recently, i suspect we've a downvoter waiting in the eaves.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:30 AM
1

i think the hairstyle suits diana more :)
/r/MensRights31/10/13 06:30 PM
5

hitler was a man. hitler was right. ergo, hitler is men's rights!
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:12 PM
3

They're not even rich and white and they're getting their privileges checked so callously. Must be great to be a young Indian man.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:57 AM
1

Sour grapes!
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:30 AM
1

it's always gonna be sour grapes with you boy, until you get right with jesus
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:21 AM
1

blue eye pride. we need to throw off the shackles of those brownies! stop oppressing us!
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:51 AM
4

idi nahui
/r/MensRights23/10/13 10:48 PM
6

i mean was there ever any doubt?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 07:17 AM
2

grass is pretty cheap and isn't saddled with a lot of shame, i'm not sure it pans out completely there
/r/MensRights21/10/13 02:46 AM
10

hypoagency. sex is something done to a woman, the liquor loosened her inhibitions to the point where she allowed sex to be done to her. hyperagency. sex is something done by a man, the liquor loosened his inhibitions to the point where he did sex to someone.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:35 PM
33

an omnivore reverts to eating grass when the local prey is too much of a gamble to pursue.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 08:13 PM
3

if you actually do these things i'd like to hear the conclusion you come to, you've endeared yourself to me with your amicable nature.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 06:36 PM
5

there's little work to be done here with spreading the message of gender roles, we're all pretty well aware of them. this isn't an barbarian culture in dire need of education. i won't dismiss your claim of women being held to roles and views perpetrated by men (and women as well) because it's true. society generally holds women to a standard that cannot be adhered to 100%, it is an idealised caricature and it affords all manner of responsibilities and privileges. i will also tell you that the sa…
/r/MensRights20/10/13 06:29 PM
9

i conceded the downvotes to your label because feminism is so vehemently rejected in this sub, so you're going to evoke reactionary downvotes in that regard - much like any other subject with differing opinions. the dichotomy you proposed remains dumb. as to the content, well i'll give you a few examples why people would disagree with their votes rather than their words. Look, men have ENSLAVED women. a highly debated piece of information with no citations, and the way you worded it as if it was…
/r/MensRights20/10/13 06:01 PM
6

You're gonna get downvoted for the content of your post not the label you subscribe to (ok maybe a little with the label because of its implications here). Hoisting up the false dichotomy that you'll only get downvoted because of you being a feminist is dumb.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:36 PM
8

NO FUN ALLOWED, GET BACK INTO THE HATE ENGINE!
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:07 PM
3

i'm always bemoaning reddit's lack of static information structures and this is a grape way to get our swamp of links jettisoned to the rest of the 80k. nicework nicemod.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:17 PM
13

hey custer's revenge was all about putting that native poon on a pedestal. the guy dances past a rainfall of arrows to bang her up against a cactus, if that doesn't speak to inherent female value then i don't know what does!
/r/MensRights12/10/13 09:00 PM
3

if you don't mind me asking what were you reasonings for supporting the circumcision of your son at that time?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:19 PM
5

no compassion for male vulnerability. i hate it but i'm constantly reminded of my own societally encouraged disposability. who outside my immediate circle would show genuine concern for me if i took a long breath from a short pipe tomorrow?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:53 AM
1

"Beware the alien, the mutant, the heretic." if it's different it isn't like us. if it isn't like us it's like them.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:48 AM
-11

the fact you're more able to identify as queer than as a man is evidence enough.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:40 AM
1

i'm pretty sure selling oneself into slavery was a valid form of payment way back when. that would construe as consensual slavery would it not?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:42 AM
5

you demonise the thing so much yet post a direct link to the article. are we unaware of clickbait yellow journalism here or is it just me?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:39 AM
1

it's understandable, i mean to ill will to you or your son. if you don't mind me asking, why were you circumcised and what's your opinion on your circumcision now as an adult?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:23 AM
2

you can't see the humour in that? i thought it was pretty funny
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:54 AM
1

do you honestly think i actively harass, demonise and ostracise circumcised men? that i don't consider a medical necessity to be a valid reason to chop the flop? cmon now mister i think you're aggravated because it's a close subject to you, and your son's case is in the minority i'm afraid. no one i know who opposes circumcision vilifies the circumcised.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:39 AM
2

i've started calling high powered males victims of benevolent sexism lately. it never gets a laugh but it sure makes me crease up. it's such a bollocks phrase.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:37 AM
4

a part of me really, really, really wants this shit to happen, just to see the world crumble. the gynocentric fantasy of a non-existent male is fully realised, which means no glass ceiling, no glass cellar - men are just not there. let the whole fucker burn. woah i got really morbid there. equality of outcome is a horrible paradigm to aspire to and defeats the entire purpose of equality. why should i try hard if i know i'll get a seat on the board to fill the quota?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:25 AM
7

how many young men are in jail because of their vulnerable status within their sphere of life? how many young men have taken the rap for something to save face or out of some twisted sense of loyalty? christ this is so ignorant, women have no agency and there is no compassion for men. the world spins right on through.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:40 AM
5

are you foreskinless heathens that numb to your own past victimisation here? you can't miss what you've never had, sure, but someone took a knife to the most sensitive part of your penis when you were only a few days old because "reasons". there's nothing wrong with ambivalence towards it, but to flippantly suggest it was for your betterment, and indeed anyone's betterment is mind boggling.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:32 AM
13

you were being shakendown and you refused. she defaulted on calling you a buzzword and retreated. you really shouldn't feel bad about this. you had no obligation to her or her cause and she specifically called you a mysoginyst because it's an overly charged term in society today. it was meant to make you feel crummy - don't let that extorting dummy dictate your feelings. but this really belongs in /r/mensrants if anything which i suspect is why there are some acerbic comments are here.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:37 AM
2

cool beans. wish we had the 80k to a person behind an issue, we'd get some serious spotlight for sure.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:27 AM
2

there's an awful hypocritical streak in this sub when it comes to this and the fact that you were downvoted to 0 is evidence if it right here. i agree with you that brigading is an issue we renounce but it still occurs, and it's ridiculous that we act like it doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:49 AM
43

man up is pretty catch-all for "your problems have no value". no compassion, no simple human empathy.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 06:42 PM
3

cmon now fred let's not clickbait.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 02:15 PM
16

i doubt he's an mra by any concious means, he's just a really good observationalist with some self respect. he's also way funnier than louie! (bring the downvotes, go fuck yourselves!)
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:32 PM
7

i feel mrs. davey was far too dismissive about the damage fatherlessness causes and too focused on a cure for the situation of male deserts rather than the prevention, which mr. bailey seemed more concerned with. she rattled on about single parent families needing much more support from the government, how they are often wracked with poverty and that is the true key to the statistics tying these households with criminal children. i disagree and mr. bailey's comments about the lack of a male role…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:25 PM
2

the powerful stefan molyneux
/r/MensRights25/09/13 08:49 AM
8

male power fantasy! animal abuse! how dare he oppress that poor monkey with his y chromosome!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:04 PM
0

the pity party here is really evident in places, it's reddit you have the easily upvoted material that speaks to the mode, it's just how the site works. i personally walked away from this place a while ago because and exchange like the one you're having in this thread. i was berated and caught in looping arguments for an opinion and it was horrible, left a bad taste in my mouth for weeks. there've been modposts to the effect of trying to instil a little less dreary content, there are a few spin …
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:35 PM
2

i'm not sure if you know /u/stln00b personally and he has a problem with people listening to him in life, but saying "This is why nobody listens to you." can only be construed as an all-encompassing you. as far as the conflagration that has risen around you i have no clue. i've tried to be peaceable and diffuse the situation and i even found myself second guessing it, saying that perhaps i'm inadvertently white knighting a deserved recipient of anger. whatever the case, you've come into a place …
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:13 PM
1

true. i'm not one to jump to such wild conclusions but i half suspect Franci to not be here in good faith.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:00 PM
5

you've kicked a wasp's nest, gotten stung and used that as evidence that all wasps are racist. cmon now friendo, let's not pretend your demure posts haven't been the least bit inflammatory in a very emotionally charged thread in a very emotionally charged subreddit. i'm not condoning how people have been lashing out at you but to take that as pudding-proof he hates women is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:51 PM
-1

in his defence, niggle, i think you're being way too aggressive here. /u/FranciBambi said something that obviously irked you at a level that made your passion gland inflame and i think you're barking at the postman here. not that i don't agree with your sentiment however, there was a lot of dismissal of all the good things the people here do, myself include i volunteer at few local centres and engage in education projects for juveniles.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:37 PM
-1

to flip that on its head the same train of thought niggle is on could apply here. just because they visit those subs and don't publicise their defence of men's rights does not mean it isn't there.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:35 PM
20

think of how many enemies you mercilessly slay in games that are all dudes. are there any women you kill in droves in the latest call of duty? i guess that's still misogyny though, they're underrepresented. i find the infection (and it is an infection) of feminism into mainstream gaming these days is the forerunner of people ignoring the glass cellar. they are tonnes of articles, movements, campaigns and studies done on why women aren't in more games - as characters of importance or worth. where…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:24 PM
3

the 80k sub number is deceiving, i was of that mind a bit ago as well, but the active members number more in the thousands than the tens of thousands. and of those, probably only a few are in any position to rally a cause at the drop of a hat. i agree with you that the lack of any noticeable activism from a sub whose denizens call themselves men's rights activists is a little disconcerting, but beyond being lucky enough to be in a location with a men's centre full of like minded individuals we h…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 11:26 AM
8

what is there to activate about here. the victim is dead. his son has been turned against him by a mother who presumably didn't care for his well being. there's no cause to rally around besides pointing out how it could've been prevented. a little compassion in mr. walker's life might've saved him, but the cause of his death is something we pow-wow and rah-rah about quite a lot: the court system. i apologise for being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 10:49 AM
10

feminism has our problems covered it's ok. to be fair we're an unnecessary movement.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 10:35 AM
17

refractory period
/r/MensRights21/09/13 08:46 AM
3

that's kaufman levels of comittment a character. i wouldn't even be mad, i'd be impressed.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:25 AM
23

the /v/ edit is pretty good as well.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:36 PM
12

he doesn't think the patriarchy is under threat so that settles it. the men at the highest echelons of society aren't under any pressure, so fuck little boys. fuck young men. fuck em. under the bus they go. welp :(
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:37 PM
3

how is she going to keep up with you when societal pressures insist she raise a family though? i'm playing devil's advocate here but it's a reasonable question.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 05:35 PM
2

i wonder what will become of him. did he educate himself while incarcerated? can you truly live a live after homelessness and a decade in jail? i'm entertaining the morbid idea that this man has been institutionalised to a degree that remaining in prison would be better off. :(
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:21 PM
5

i prefer low-orbiting ham planet
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:30 PM
3

if you enjoy bill's standup listen to his podcast, the monday morning podcast, it's pretty funny. the guy is on point with a lot of stuff and he's willing to learn and expose himself to new perspectives as well. a real human bean.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:23 PM
1

nice try, guinness spokesperson! but you don't need to link my alcoholism with my activism, i'm already your shill :C
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:20 PM
2

to be fair rightsbot is always up in everyone's business, you never get alone time when he's around. even cold, calculating robots need love ;_;
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:12 PM
-1

poor ignorant men. if that don't have ignorance, what else is left?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:57 AM
2

poor indian men. if they don't have islam, what else is left?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:57 AM
1

poor jewish men. if they don't have money, what else is left?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:57 AM
1

poor hispanic men. if they don't have gold, what else is left?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:56 AM
4

poor asian men. if they don't have maths, what else is left?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:56 AM
6

poor black men. if they don't have rap, what else is left?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:56 AM
1

my intent was to portray the take a gun and you make that sick son of a bitch suffer. as the vigilante justice here, not the act of prying the rapist off his daughter . perhaps i didn't convey that enough.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:02 PM
0

would that vindicate bobby's vigilante execution of daddy? the immediacy of the analogy isn't really the important thing.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:38 PM
0

i was basing the vigilante comment of that if the father was of the mind to extend the rapists suffering in a way /u/M4Strings had mentioned he would no longer apply for the "heat of the moment" defensive type action. the attacker is subdued and totally at your mercy, it then becomes a premeditated act of malice more than an instinctual need to protect.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:34 PM
-1

so lil bobby flores calls the amber lamps after he shoots daddy it's ok? defend is different from kill, man. i understand in his rage he caused death, i have no idea if i could restrain myself in a similar situation, but to lionise that kind of behavior is reprehensible. to state that his violent death wasn't enough is even more so. i mean where's the drop off point of violent vigilante retribution? when does the law stop turning a blind eye? is there even a point to a law if you can just ignore…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:32 AM
10

there's a lot of men who are circumcised who are vehemently in opposition of keeping it in tact. i won't cast aspersions about their character but they are definitely out there and on this sub.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:51 AM
-1

i disagree. this type of vigilante justice appeals to emotion, it's reactionary and honestly where does it stop if you condone this? what's stopping little bobby flores from "avenging" the murder of his big brother jesus?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:21 AM
-1

he should refute blatant sexism on a sub about equality? really? it's not tone policing for him to be angry about someone making blanket statements about women, it's basic human decency.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:17 AM
1

because rape
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:08 AM
0

the attention of a rapist is not my intent! :(:(:(:(
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:57 AM
0

you say that like my point wouldn't have been conveyed otherwise cmon bro step it up
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:54 AM
3

where is Everthing_is_Rape when you need them
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:02 AM
1

one drunk night with my old man i got a little too deep into the sauce and we minced from our usual banter about arnie movies into gender and real world problems. with my wits dulled by the good stuff i had to lay out my opinions to i man a love and respect while i slurred and couldn't formulate sentences. in this case i simply reverted to reptilian logic. i asked why haven't men done for themselves what women have. why, after he acknowledged all the good stuff women had managed to get themselve…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:02 AM
11

thing you gotta realise is that through a lot of jockeying and manipulationg of social zeitgeist, for many people feminism = equality = the default for a decent well-rounded person. so when you've got this ideaology that has co opted and forced the mainstream awareness of egalitarianism under it's umbrella, you get people who think that feminism = equality. a narrative designed to wear the coat of a sheep while lobbying for the wolves will eventually lead to the flock believing a wolf's perspect…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:54 AM
4

there's quite a few subreddits centered around vehement opposition of this one, as is their right. best to acknowledge the few valid criticisms they might have and ignore their vitriol. gender is a very emotionally charged subject, people aren't themselves when it comes to something like this(or perhaps they are only truly themselves, but that's for another time). a life led for malice is often a life not led.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:47 AM
6

u fukin wot m8
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:14 PM
12

as a man you have to earn respect. as women they deserve respect. see how it is? yeah. yeah. :( yeah.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:17 PM
2

it's what i say every time. a company exists to profit. if i could pay my workers less for the same amount of work i would. why aren't women 100% of the workforce?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:43 AM
2

he asked what qualifies as a "top" judge
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:16 PM
0

you've already made your mind up and i will try to re-evalute my thinking on this, but i still implore you to consider that being treated like a child based on your gender is also sexism.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:30 PM
-1

you're eager for a villain aren't you? read back what you just wrote, do you think you're an example of rational thinking equality?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:25 PM
1

i nowhere said that this was really sexist against women, i said it was sexist against both men and women. in your comparison the black's death is devalued. in italy the woman's death is overvalued. it doesn't really work. it's still a crime to kill a man in italy, right? they didn't slip in a part where suddenly a murder is only a murder when the victim is female, right?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:35 PM
0

never said it wasn't friendo. are you that dedicated to injustices men face that you're willing to dismiss the ones women do? remind you of someone?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:16 PM
-4

US OR THEM AM I RIGHT? sexism is a binary switch! a law that coddles women at the expense of men is still sexist against women. would you be okay if i exempted you from an exam everyone else has to take because i thought you were too stupid to answer the questions, or better yet, the questions would hurt you and you were incapable of defending yourself from them? you're directing your anger towards something that isn't there, this is a sexist law, to both men and women. am i to be reprimanded be…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:15 PM
2

no need to apologise, reddit is horrendous for displaying things logically. the sidebar is so out of the spectrum of where you look and it's the only place rules are placed outside of a sticky, which are just green words that link to another page.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:03 PM
3

please observe the rules of this subreddit and change the www. to a np. in the links you provide! on topic: i say this every time the wagegap comes up. if a company, whose sole reason to exist is profit and sustaining itself, could employ an entire subset of people for much less pay and get away with it they would. if women make 70, hell if women make 50 to a man's 100, why aren't all for-profit companies entirely made up of women?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:16 PM
-5

pretty sexist to both genders. men are worth less and entirely disposable, women are deemed precious objects to be coddled. nice job, italia
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:05 PM
20

i'd posit that it might have something to do with the demonisation of masculinty. a room full of something you consider 100% toxic has got to be frightening, don't you think?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 08:15 PM
1

i'm not disagreeing with you here i'm trying to assume the side of arguement that those who downvote you are too afraid to voice themselves. i've got no rebuttal for you, friendo. be still. :)
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:15 PM
1

danke
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:14 PM
1

know any soon-to-be brides i can strip for?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:51 PM
11

man up. no sorry that was a terrible joke. express your opinion without resorting to weird mind games and social jockeying, maybe. i personally don't know much about linux, it's community or this developer so i cannot vouch for its integrity or its meritocratic values, but certainly she can do something other than pull the femm-card to preface her woes?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:44 PM
9

if this thing gets legs i'm betting he will be harassed and tagged as a sex offender. that's enough to warrant an ounce of compassion for him right?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:33 PM
24

i was under the impression that nothing had happened to it. cite its roots in equality and i'll cite white feather campaigns.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:32 PM
0

STOP USING LOGIC AGAINST ME!!!!
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:12 PM
1

nah mate fuck rick, that guy is just irredeemable.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:04 PM
11

in an effort to counteract the faceless/arguementless downvotes you're getting for such a reasonable question: i believe the same as you, however the approach and obvious endgame of this particular developer seems more akin to an attempt to get Torvalds to "play her game" rather than actually improve the community.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:01 PM
1

can't be sex positive if it still demonises male sex. woman are not sex, it's a two sided coin. can't hate a penis and love a vagina and say you're sex positive.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:49 PM
0

so you're saying a woman can never feel joy in her sexuality, knowing that her beauty tantalizes a room? every stripper everywhere has a hidden and dark reason for getting naked, it's not just a simple pleasure with a huge paycheck? if i could get paid, put on a pedastal and deified for how i looked in a spaghetti string bikini lemme tell you the shit i would spend all that money on.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:48 PM
1

mate you manage to articulate a lot of what i am unable to. you're quickly becoming one of my favourite posters and mah nigga.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:43 PM
3

a woman's sex is seen as valuable by default. a man's is seen as degrading. a man gains value through sleeping with as many women as he can, a woman loses value through sleeping with as many men as she can. und this is why shit's fucked
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:41 PM
1

nah i mean it's camp, kinda cheesey kinda self aware kinda not. a lot of 80s comic books and films were pulp. sort of low budget and loving it types.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:18 PM
1

it's pretty good if you get some mates together and make something of drinking session with it. it gets ridiculous at times and it's so pulp, good stuff.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:35 AM
10

is that what your father told you? does he advocate female circumcision as well? play out your logic for me please, i'm curious how what steps you take that lead you to this caveman-correction thing.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:22 PM
7

why did he then?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:06 PM
4

there's such a thing as overstimulation, and it can cause serious discomfort. pleasure isn't a binary thing, it's nerves being stimulated. too much at once is more pain than pleasure.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:00 PM
8

thing is that now that folk have wizened up to the fact there's huge profit to be had within "nerd culture" they're trying to mainstream what is perceived as the positives to being a nerd. the quirky, intelligent, awkward-in-a-cute-way person who is amazing and unique and doesn't conform to what you might thing is normal, but is still a complete person. that's trying to be adopted while ignoring the shame, mocking and ritualised persecution of these weirdos (in this case the unique, different, e…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:25 PM
-1

pretty hostile aren't you, what's making you so angry?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 12:06 AM
2

i'd say the majority of us are against stomping people into puddles too, friendo.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:34 PM
5

to that string of thought i have to ask then that if most employers are so deeply misogynistic then why aren't the ones who aren't miles ahead in terms of profitability? the cards a truly stacked against them if in a world of bottom lines a 20% profit just isn't worth employing a woman!
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:17 PM
3

if it were legal and encouraged to pay women less for the same work why would a business whose sole purpose is profit employ men at all? why aren't women 100% of the work force?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:47 PM
1

can we put the squeeze on the sarcastic bile as well? it's getting really hard to keep a positive mental image of the sub's users when every submission is peppered with comments full of /s. there's enough sarcasm in this place to make a teenager blush now.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:24 PM
2

if i get away with paying someone $0.77 instead of $1 per hour. why would i not solely employ the $0.77? why are women not 100% of the workforce?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:55 PM
4

not all feminists are like that right
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:23 AM
5

tb is my waifu, i'm not ashamed. i hope she reads this. very well put forward as usual, and all that violent hand gesturing? be still my beating heart. also bonus points for that guy in the background about half way through who knew he was in the shot and darted out of frame.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:45 PM
1

nice strawman dude wanna assume my shoe size while you're at it?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:34 PM
-5

a business exists to sustain itself. anything is worth what the customer will pay for it. we've got to separate the view of who the bad guy is here. it's not the business, it's what society expect of men and women. this is entirely acceptable for the business to do. it is entirely unacceptable for society to encourage.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:26 AM
-3

i'm with you here friendo, mangina is a ridiculous word and i'm hard pressed to take anyone who uses it seriously. it reeks of manhood academy MANsculism.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:05 AM
3

you and your heroin metaphor man, just give it a rest. are you projecting? do you consider sex so irresistible and illicit that you have to compare it to an extremely addictive and destructive narcotic? i'm still waiting on that newsletter btw
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:56 AM
17

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_6IjYfHFjw
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:03 AM
3

if you categorise rape to be an act that encompasses a denial and theft of bodily autonomy and choice then this could be construed as rape yes. however if consent was there it ain't. theft, fraud, perjury, and all that other good shit though i'm sure would still stand up
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:40 AM
19

man you come up with some whacky shit, do you gots a newsletter?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:10 AM
2

smell that? man academy maybe? hmm i dunno could just be roadkill. best safer than sorry, i guess. downvote report ignore.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:06 AM
1

he's just spearheading the next wave of super hackers. necessity breeds invention after all. i'm sure magda will cease to be pre-teen human traffic sexually servicing people once she hears about cameron cracking down on porn for her. nice job dave.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:04 AM
1

this seems more like a case of where the writer cannot separate value from vulnerability than i accidentally my hate speech.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:55 AM
3

yeah those stupid broads, incapable of true kinship or camaraderie! only wired with base feels and disgusting emotions! i'd mimic typhonblue here and mention something about niggers in my satirical juxtaposition but it think you get the point. to write off the entire gender based on your own anecdotal experiences? cmon now bub. here lemme play the devil's advocate here and swip swap them genders like we love to do so much round here. I guess it just surprises me to see women getting so frorthy o…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:50 AM
3

so you're suggesting half of the species are inherit sociopaths unable to act in any way but according to their wiring? doesn't this sound a little too familiar, friendo?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:43 AM
-1

entire sub's getting silly. i hate to be of that mind but the zeitgeist of this subreddit has taken a nose dive in integrity lately. might be prudent to invest in a primer of sorts, i'm seeing a lot of awful stuff that can't all be subjective.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:44 PM
8

check your privilege heartland shitlord, the lack of female nazis is blatant misogyny.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:28 AM
1

careful now friendo, assigning the brand to unwilling participants is how feminism approached much of the lgbt community and the notion of 'equality' at large. would you like to follow their footsteps?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:07 PM
1

papa nurgle isn't exactly the best example! he keeps the eldar goddess of healing chained in a cage to perfect his "gifts" it's practically analogous to the patriarchy! hurr hurr hurr
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:03 PM
1

man OP, you really fucked this one up didn't you? :P to all you folks getting angry, scroll down, the point of OP's post was the text below, not the comic.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 09:25 AM
5

ask for citations. be nice about it, seem concerned. whoa what's awful do you have any source for that i'm compelled to learn more. see what they link, if anything.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:25 AM
12

at the very least if such a thing went through there would be prohibition era establishments dedicated to private masturbation, instead of speak easy it'd be stroke easy. such is life in the post-fempocalypse.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:35 AM
17

dude if they did that there'd be wars, not marriages
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:59 PM
-2

glad i could help
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:03 AM
-9

pick your battles friendo. this is some highschool shit right here. i've noticed this a lot more recently but even when this sub peaked over 60k readers the propensity to overreact skyrocketed. yes, it is extremely sexist, insensitive and if the genders were swapped and HR got wind of it things would get squashed quickly. it's an awful affair and it really isn't worth losing your job over. so rise above it. instead of falling into the over stereotyped feminist that sees rape in everything, try n…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:07 PM
5

rediculous, however, is definitely a made up word! :p
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:57 PM
2

so if a woman is incapable of change and abusive at a base level, we shouldn't bother trying to prevent that because it's her nature. and if feminism declares men to be rape loving beasts at a reptilian-brain level, should we bother trying to prevent that because it's his nature? i think we just got the go ahead to rape, guys! :D :D :D :D (not that i needed it anyway) fondles erection and privilege
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:38 PM
23

muh intrinsic oppression!
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:43 PM
7

cool. enjoy your stay, get ready for people to break your balls about identifying as a feminist, these fellas get rowdy at the mere mention of it! :P but i can see from what you like about the demeanor in this sub that you're more than willing to tackle that shit. woop woop!
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:03 PM
1

you dredged a hearty chortle from me, you silly cunt.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 04:14 PM
6

you'd be surprised how easily they can sucker people in. they spam links to long videos with circular rhetoric and "the power is in you!" self-help-guru approach to language. a lot of folks in vulnerable or ignorant situations fall prey to their tactics, not knowing that "growing a pair of fucking balls" is manhood academy's way of using your disposability to line their pockets.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:03 PM
10

when you hear about the radical men's rights movement members, and the misogynist vocal minority, chances are it's these guys. they've been here long before Something Awful's abortion of a subreddit become what it is today.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:00 PM
8

they really don't. their language is foul, overly aggressive, shaming and their "debating" techniques mirror the post modernism approach our beloved friends within the feminist spectrum so skillfully wield.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:59 PM
10

going to hijack your post here typhon, hope you don't mind. this thread is being hounded by manhood academy folks. don't provide links, it gives them traffic and views. i would delete the large example posted here as well mods, and provide a quoted block sans links for clarity if you're insistent on it. these people are not interested in debate, or discussion. they simply want your views and use the same yellow journalism tactics jezebel and kotaku use to get views. flagrant titles and contraver…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:54 PM
5

i was referring to the folks of advice animals subreddit who let the more reasonable comments float the top. nice assumptions tho, must be difficult being so venomous. Edit; gonna apologise about that venomous comment, i was being quite venomous myself. sorry.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:27 PM
10

after the 12 hours that submission has been up i think the common sense brigade has managed to dredge the more level headed comments up toward the top. that thread is a nightmare though.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:25 PM
4

sinfest has been a not so subtle vehicle for the author's politics for a while now, which is a shame because it was a decent comic before
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:09 PM
0

christ on a bike that person is being obtuse. i've never seen someone avoid a point so much - they're practically orbiting it.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:37 AM
-3

i believe he was referring to those who are indeed intentionally friendzoning and are aware of their actions, actively pursuing the avenue because it's available to them. people being oblivious will always happen, and it's a sad thing when it does, but when it's something that is premeditated upon then it becomes a cat of a different coat. the compound upon that, i heavily agree that the revolted attitude towards a man who expresses his woes upon being subject to an intentional (or socially engi…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:58 PM
5

the man asked how this ever seem like a good. what is to this not ever to understand this go as far to like?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:28 PM
6

it's my understanding that feminists only care about the lgbt stock when it suits them. in this case Turing is just another man taking up space that women deserve.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:03 PM
7

the social life outside of the women he lusts for is spent with other males, in those dreaded "male safe spaces" that are apparently breeding grounds for misogyny or even worse - by himself, where he stews in his privilege and sponges from society by simply existing. or such is my rather exaggerated sarcastic opinion.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:41 PM
7

i doubt the people i intend this message to reach even read comments, but can we please stop mindlessly upvoting single image posts? while their content might be mensrights the near zero discussion held within their comments section isn't :C
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:46 PM
-6

the sub has become a grounds for whooping and hollering about every little thing that pertains to gender issues, regardless if it's relevant. i suppose people like to hear their enemies lament over the sound of their own progress and victory. :/
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:16 PM
3

while his words are crass i can't help but agree with them, who are you but someone dipping on both sides and waiting to be redacted? i say the same thing to MRAs during the MRHM split - which i still think is stupid. i appreciate your open mind on gender issues though. :)
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:58 PM
2

i often question the conclusions i come to when i expose myself to both this sub and other, more feminist ones. objectivity is hard to maintain when you feel personally effected by the things that go on in this gender-cold-war but i'm content in my decision to never hold things concrete. apply the scientific method to your political and social outlooks and you find yourself evolving as a person
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:38 PM
3

i love trendy stuff. but i don't LOVE to love it. [pudgy man closes his pamphlet to the local fashion show] because that stuff and the women that love it, LOVE to make us men not love OURSELVES. [previously pictured man sat at a table littered with fedoras] i was only WEARY at FIRST [him rubbing his poorly shaven neck in the mirror] IS IT EVEN possible to look like that? [posing in front of his mirror with an ill-fitting suit, to the reflection of a dapper and flexing gent] IT didn't matter. RIG…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:34 PM
3

orange: in recent years there has been a rash of spray/fake tan and its victims. typically (but not always) younger women trying to darken up to look better. it ends ups poorly done and you've got an orange lady. banshees: while not a strict correlating trait, the people who choose to douse themselves in fake tan happen to be of a certain mind and attitude when it comes to social convention. aka they don't know that belting at the top of your lungs when you're "laughing" is both obnoxious and an…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:12 PM
8

it was a useful albeit wasteful answer to a no-win scenario. tell me, would you rather your tools burn up in a fire or the factory that made your tools? crude analogy, i admit, but it stands that up until recent advances the safest bet was always the factory. the "potential" for more. with woman and children first you hedge your bets that while the potential productivity of the man who sacrifices his seat is permanently gone, the potential that his wife can bear more child, or that his child wil…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:48 PM
2

to expand on this a tad with my own viewpoint, i think the idea of masculinity itself was defined around the strict fact that as a man you are disposable. you are the one who fights the lion with the spear, you are the one who dies in the mine shaft for a wage, you are the one who ships off to fight on foreign soil for ideals and principles. masculinity, to me at least, was always about accepting and adhering to that. you trudge on through hardships "because that's what a man does". i think at i…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:38 PM
18

it's fake, there's a string of them and they started out quite believable. a few of them were talking about anita sarkeesian and the apparent inherit misogyny in men being sexualised in video games (the idea being that trynig to pander to female lust is anti-woman -yeah) but yes it's fake, but for all you folks out there: there's a reason patricia hernandez is made light of with these, she's very smart about garnering sensationalist views on her articles. yellow journalism at its finest.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:54 PM
10

it's 4chan green text, and on a nsfw board too (the pink background), so the legitimacy of the story and its recency is highly in question. however if its content has a shred a truth i can only hope the rest of the thread didn't devolve into a baseless woman hating dance around the central fire and they actually discussed ways to help this individual. of course unless OP was in the thread and it's still open i don't think anything but bile and understandable frustration can be expressed within t…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter