TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hannahebird Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by hannahebird on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Nah. Ask any single woman when was the last time she had sex, she’ll say something like “about 2 weeks ago”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 12:38 PM
0

https://reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/nddx15/_/gybyx9t/?context=1
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 03:19 PM
1

Well OP is one who was plated by Chad both young and old.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 03:19 PM
3

Only the top 20% of women are getting the “older Chads” who you claim have changed to BB. The majority of women (80% of them) who were plated by Chads in their 20s end up settling with a beta who was sexually unsuccessful in his youth when they are both in their 30s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 12:27 PM
0

https://reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/nddx15/_/gybft4s/?context=1
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 12:21 PM
1

the women who get young Chad also get old Chad Sure, for casual sex. Majority of women (ie, women who are at least 4/10) can get a Chad (young or old) to pump and dump them. However, only a minority of these women (ie, women 8/10 or above), can get the Chad to commit to them Only truly hideous women (ie, the bottom 20%) can’t even get a Chad to plate her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 12:21 PM
–

They are showing their racism and hate. It’s ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:50 PM
–

as he should be Why do you think that ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 08:28 PM
–

That’s because most men are desperate and thirsty and don’t have the option to be picky
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 03:05 PM
2

But the preference for fat women is not
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 01:45 PM
3

It’s obvious teehee They’re so fucking predictable
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 01:22 PM
2

Most ppl are normal
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 01:21 PM
1

Does not messaging women drop your tinder elo? No, if anything it raises it What drops it is swiping right on too many women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 01:21 PM
5

Who said women don’t give good dating advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 01:19 PM
1

Keep these coming haha 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 02:40 AM
2

If by “date”, you mean casual FWBs, then yeah. If you mean LTR, then no.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 10:15 PM
1

thats assuming theyre all fat and balding
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 04:07 AM
2

but no guy with a working brain would flush thousands a month on a call girl. No one is paying thousands on seeking arrangements A given man can see one college “sugar baby” for only a couple hundred once per month if he wants I’m talking normie college women in your biology class. The same girls you’re following on Instagram right now are doing it. The same girls you see and match with on tinder. Not call girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 02:54 AM
3

The rest get paid by the hour for the majority of encounters with clients. The rest arent being paid by the hour. They’re paid a couple hundred to fuck and just stay and chill for however long. You need to re read my original comment I have many friends on seeking arrangements, and I’ve done it myself as well The lavish fantasy of what people think seeking arrangements is needs to exit their minds. Forget what you think you know about Seeking Arrangements. It’s not like that at all
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 02:51 AM
9

Nobody does monthly allowance on seeking arrangements. Thats just what the advertisements say. For 99% of the girls on there, it’s pay per meet prostitution, like backpage
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 12:47 AM
8

Yep. Actual escorts make much more money than sugar babies, because escorts charge by the hour. On the other hand, the sugar baby only collects a couple hundred TOTAL and often spends many hours and even overnights with the dude for that small amount of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 12:41 AM
2

Only fans girls aren’t sugar babies I’m talking about Seeking Arrangements “sugar babies” (ie, prostitutes)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 12:40 AM
2

Most sugar babies aren’t prostitutes. Hahahahahah As a man who has lots of friends on Seeking Arrangements, this claim is laughable Who are you trying to fool? the clueless blue pilled masses of men who dont know whats going on behind the scenes? you're not fooling any red-pilled aware men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 11:42 PM
28

The average man cannot afford a sugar baby. Yes he can. The men and women of this sub greatly misunderstand what actually happens in sugaring on Seeking Arrangements. It is NOT the lavish fantasy you think it is. Its pay per meet fucking for a couple hundred per meet. Basically prostitution, except it’s on seeking arrangements instead of backpage. The average man can just see one (or many) "sugar babies" as often as his budget allows, whether it be once per month, or several times per month. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 11:38 PM
18

Beta bucks time, am ReadyToSettleDownTM 💁‍♀️
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/21 03:55 AM
2

And if we did meet one, they never revealed themselves This is what’s happening. Women get fuckzoned because we estimate they have a high n count. Though, we never give them the real reason why we don’t want a relationship with them (ie, because they have a high n count). We just give a generic politically correct reason such as, “I’m not looking for a relationship right now” with a guy who was her tenth and she was his tenth So her n count was 30 and his was 5
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 11:42 AM
2

And later in life, being more mature and grounded, coming to the realization that such an empty and vapid life is meaningless and uninteresting. Conveniently around age 30 when their fertility and looks start to rapidly decline? Nah, if women’s fertility and looks lasted till age 50, they’d spend ages 18-50 doing this and then only SettleDownTM around age 50 That timing is how you know it’s deliberate and not because they “matured”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 11:40 AM
5

Prenups can be thrown out The only way a man can ensure his financial security is by not getting married
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 10:41 AM
2

You just described perfectly why it’s a bad idea for men to get married
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 10:40 AM
1

I’ve slept with 14 different guys and most were meaningless one night stands. . I plan on waiting until marriage to have sex in my next relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/21 02:36 PM
1

Says the one licking the leftover fluids of other men who recently fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/21 02:23 PM
0

Why are the women upvoting the automod to drown out the men’s comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 11:44 PM
1

I guess in order to do this you must withdraw most sex you have with him. If a woman is even thinking about doing this with a given man (or actually doing this — withdrawing sex) then she sees him as a low value beta. Period. That thought would never cross a woman’s mind if the man in question is a high value alpha male who gives her the tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 11:39 PM
1

Problem is, women don’t want simps. The want the guy who doesn’t give a fuck about them or their pleasure in the bedroom
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 11:34 PM
1

Just based off the fact I was willing to eat a pussy Licking the fluids of the other guy(s) she fucked that week 🤡 You “nabbed” them after the selfish casual guys already finished with them Okay 👌 You put more effort for the same thing. Would you buy a certain meal from a restaurant if you knew they handed it out for free to the 5 customers before you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 11:32 PM
1

Two reasons: I) the man is above her in SMV And/or II) the man has estimated that she’s a hoe (ie, has a high n-count)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 08:47 PM
1

Why do you think women are fuckzoned? Hahahaha ——- In any case You: “How much a man cares about n-count is correlated with his own n count.” Also you: “Ahhh unverifiable anecdotes.. gotcha!” How ironic
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 08:16 PM
1

My own experience, as well as the experience of my friends and acquaintances A woman’s (high) n-count is the reason why they are fuckzoned
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 08:33 AM
-1

Yeah, the more experienced (high n) a man is, the more he will prefer women with a low n count for commitment, because he sees first hand why high n women are bad bets for commitment
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 05:57 AM
2

1 in 10 people around you are born of deceit , and this is based on large population studies done by geneticists in the UK, rather than cases where men doubt paternity. So it’s representative of the population at large. See below: One person in 10 is mistaken about the identity of their father, genetic tests for hereditary illnesses are revealing, according to an NHS chief. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/05/31/oneperson-10-mistaken-identity-father-reveals-nhs-chief/
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/21 05:53 AM
2

/thread
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 02:55 AM
1

Today I found out there was a baby making app. Yikes Same. Never knew this was a thing Post wall women are desperate as fuck lmfao
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/21 06:53 PM
2

Men, if you’re balding just shave your head completely
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 09:22 PM
20

Lol they’re trying to normalize hoe-ness
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 09:21 PM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 09:20 PM
2

Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/02/21 09:14 PM
1

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 04:24 PM
4

using virginity as an excuse to go after young inexperienced women they think will be impressed by their underachievement... etc Wrong. The reason is to avoid women who cheat (ie, high n count women). We don’t want to raise kids who aren’t ours. Female Infidelity Based on Number of Premarital Sex Partners -- Statistics Brain Number of pre-marital partners: percent who cheated once married 2: 10.4% 3: 14.9% 4: 17.7% 5: 21.6% 6-10: 26.0% 11-20: 36.7% 21+: 46.8%
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:25 PM
0

Also we probably don't know what divorce rates are for millennials and gen z yet. It will be in the stratosphere
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 06:03 AM
1

Sureee
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 12:20 AM
2

“They also don't distinguish between pre and post relationship n-counts. Cheating sluts have higher n-counts because their n-counts keep growing once they enter a relationship.” This study distinguishes between pre and post relationship n-counts. Same result, high n-count women cheat more: The high correlation for females (r = .79) between reported numbers of sex partners and EPC partners [extra-pair copulation partners def. sexual partners other than primary partner while in a monogamous relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 12:12 AM
2

Nothing more loyal than a slut in love. A low n-count woman in love
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 12:01 AM
1

I imagine you sticked your fingers in your ears as you said that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 11:55 PM
2

For casual relationships, sure. For committed LTRs and marriage? Nope Why? High n-count women cheat: In illustration of this, the odds ratio of 1.13 for lifetime sexual partners obtained with the face-to-face mode of interview indicates that the probability of infidelity increased by 13% for every additional lifetime sexual partner screenshot Regarding the correlates of infidelity, results indicated that on the basis of both methods of assessment, the probability of sexual infidelity increased w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 11:01 PM
10

that women are indoctrinating other women to slut it up. Crabs in a bucket. Yep. misery loves company.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/21 11:00 PM
0

I.e., an incredibly insecure guy. a guy who wants to avoid infidelity. Sexual promiscuity was significantly positively correlated with emotional promiscuity [r(356) = .261, p < .001], as well with sexual infidelity [r(323) = .595, p < .001] and emotional infidelity [r(323) = .676, p < .001], indicating that sexually promiscuous participants also tend to be emotionally promiscuous, and sexual[ly] and emotional[ly] unfaithful. In terms of the sexual domain, results showed that there is also a posi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:44 PM
0

It’s x8 now? Lol society has really gone downhill
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:41 AM
12

6 Yes 18 is too high
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 01:23 AM
2

6 figure success is different than billionaire success though and I don’t know if he would’ve had that without Mackenzie. Implying that Mackenzie is the reason for Amazons success 😂😂😂😂😂 You should consider stand up comedy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 01:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter