| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | The new poster campaign on campusI absolutely agree, in no way does it make it less true. But things expressed hatefully generally either make their point invalid (despite how true it is), or make some listening to it unlikely to agree with it because they disagree with how it has been expressed. Some people will whole heartedly agree of course. But if you express it rationally, and not hatefully, many more people will see it as true, and agree with it. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 09:14 AM |
| 1 | My Ph.D program, doing it right!!Good luck! | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 07:15 AM |
| 0 | The new poster campaign on campusThis is fantastic. Thank you good sir. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 07:00 AM |
| 2 | The new poster campaign on campusIf a female were to rape a male, I would still call it 'penetration without consent'. Not sure if the FBI would though. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 06:58 AM |
| 4 | The new poster campaign on campusSo silly. There would be situations where neither party wants to have sex but feels like they have to, and hence both do so against their will. These posters are indeed fantastic. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 06:54 AM |
| 14 | The new poster campaign on campusI think the issue is how it was said, not what was said. "Women are less likely to be convicted for the same offence then males are" is statistics, and science. "A vagina is a get out of free jail card" is based on science and statistics, yes, but is a hateful statement. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 06:53 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter