TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

harbo Archive

View 0 posts and 231 comments by harbo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-17

I have to ask: why this response to what I said, but not to what's said in this post?
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:15 PM
-38

I mean the truth of the current society. I'm hard pressed to think of a society where that is and, given the nature of our biology, will not be in the future. Men are expendable and useless, women are not.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:37 PM
1

My standpoint as a feminist is in line with the Britannica definition. And most people here think it's a garbage definition. If you want people here to take you seriously, stop adhering to it.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:13 PM
1

It led to killing people who were disabled. Invention of fire led to nuking of Hiroshima.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:00 PM
1

Most subreddits seems to be overrun with hysteric ideology driven shrills which accept no thinking outside the accepted parametres of their ideology. That's not true at all; try r/wine or r/weightroom for some eyebleach.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:26 AM
1

The ones who understand anything about filmmaking (ie. the ones with the money) have seen what happened to Atomic Blonde. Not that this rebranding could possibly do any better, as the core audience (45 year old men) just doesn't want to go see such a movie in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:03 PM
2

Portugese people can be white or "people of color" depending on time of day/week/year etc. Only in the US and it's make believe about whiteness. In Europe they're just as white as anybody.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:47 PM
2

people relate to the stuggles of individual people in their lives, they have feelings about the hardships of individual people in their lives Those same women would not give two shits about what happens to the boys living in the neighboring house.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/18 11:48 AM
1

You're a living example of what's wrong in society as described by the article; if I was American, I would vote for Trump just to screw the likes of you over.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/18 11:40 AM
1

I wouldn't say that Tinder was the service that made the difference I have a hard time thinking of an individual service that made a greater difference, but this is a measurement issue on something that has no data available, so I guess we'll just have to leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/18 02:03 PM
15

Tinder wasn't nearly as groundbreaking as regular online dating or even the Internet (chat rooms, forums, etc.) as a new medium for meeting singles. I completely disagree. Online dating was seen as something for losers of both genders before Tinder came along, although there was of course a shift already e.g. between 2000 and 2010. Being on OkCupid in 2010 was something you did not advertise. That said, Tinder really made this stuff completely acceptable and something that almost everyone on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/18 12:05 PM
0

Alienating men have very real consequences. We've already seen some of these consequences in later years as men distance themselves. Refusing accountability also causes a loss of respect. But this is something they don't themselves understand, a bit like people failed to understand fossil fuels and climate change.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/18 11:37 AM
3

It's basically just a horoscope that people like to pretend is scientific. I think the MBTI types are useful descriptors of stereotypes, a bit like saying someone is brave or honest, e.g. it's informative to say that many ENTJs are going to be bold and analytical. It definitely does not go the other way, so that you could predict someone's behavior in any given situation if you know their type.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/18 09:00 AM
1

That may or may not be true, but calling foods "healthy" because of it is immensely misleading and has probably caused people to be fatter because they think they're eating "healthy".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/18 07:11 PM
3

The food that is traditional and culturally accepted is healthier (at least in China or Japan) than in the West. No, there is no such thing as "healthy" food from the perspective of getting fat. Calories are calories, whether it's rice and chicken or a Big Mac. Asians just don't eat as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/18 09:02 AM
3

Bear with me here Stopped reading here
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/18 10:15 AM
1

It's easier to afford the education you need to become either if you're middle class already For getting to manage a hedge fund the education is maybe 10% of the journey.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/18 10:13 AM
1

Even after that it doesn't follow that cutting off body parts is necessarily the right answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 01:34 PM
1

The guy with children from 10 HB9s is higher status than Elon Musk in a group of men, if those men are willing to be honest with themselves. I disagree - or at least I'd rather be Musk because with his wealth I could do what I like with women without getting caught with the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/18 12:25 PM
1

I would say a man with a bunch of baby mama's sounds very low status, not high. Look at what elite men have done for the almost the whole history of the species: you spread your seed by raping the peasant women or by having a harem or by fucking the maid and the waitress when the wife isn't watching. In many places they still do - just consider what Bill Clinton got caught with or what kind of a life Dominique Strauss-Kahn leads. And those are just the ones out in the open. The only reason havin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/18 12:22 PM
2

I can't remember were I read it but it's supposedly proven in game theory (I think it was an analysis of the stable marriage problem) Well, Alvin Roth got the Nobel prize for it, so I guess the proof was ok. Also, given that we observe quite a bit of divorce (i.e. marriages are literally not stable), the market does not end up in the efficient allocation that Roth proposes. To me it seems that a couple of crucial features his model is missing (to explain real world marriage markets, not allocati…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/18 04:23 PM
2

Making arguments for other people to act in a certain way while failing to understand their preferences or cost/benefit structures on the other hand is just sheer brilliance though?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 01:12 PM
1

It's your life, do what you want, but you're just gonna get a shitload of rejection for no reward. At some point men realize that getting rejected means nothing. Again, 0 cost positive expected value opportunity. Who wouldn't take it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 01:09 PM
2

you will get a far lower success rate cold approaching than you would when approaching at social events Why not both? You might as well argue that they shouldn't use Tinder because social events work better. There's just 0 reason not to act when there's an opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 12:40 PM
3

Yeah I've never understood why this is so hard for many terps to grasp. I don't like random people talking to me in public either I wonder, do you yourself grasp the position of the approacher? Because the thing is that as long as you're just a random person to them, what you like is something they give no fucks about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 12:29 PM
14

I find it interesting mommy dearest, such an advocate for justice and all, has no clue if the dude who molested her girls was even tried. Of course she does; she just didn't want to admit that they weren't.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:23 PM
1

If he didn't she had hers and her children's income to fall back on. Wow. Just wow. Do you know why divorce laws on alimony in e.g. the United States are the way they are? Also, I thought you had some evidence on this issue. Could you please demonstrate it as you said you would be able to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 03:54 PM
2

Huh? If anything, the capability of such men behaving so was much greater than the capability of men before them and in other places. Go ahead, demonstrate your evidence of it being commonplace that ordinary men were able to provide for multiple women and their children. I double dare you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 03:40 PM
7

Men were demonstrably untrustworthy, constantly enforcing barriers on women while creating loopholes for their own. Ah, the good old apex fallacy. Do you think 19th-century factory workers (laboring for 12+ hours per day for a low income) had the capability of breaking the deal, i.e. provisioning for more than one woman's children?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 10:28 AM
2

The number of women who marry men is exactly equal to the number of men who marry women. That is not true, because of serial monogamy - some men are able to marry several times, while some never marry.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:26 AM
2

I think it really should not be interpreted as a "test" with any scientific validity, but a classification that's useful for conversation - a bit like being able to call someone "honest" or "brave" is sometimes useful.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:38 AM
3

Like I’ve said before, some people are sexual communists while at the same time being economic capitalists. I for one am both an economic and sexual capitalist, but I complain about the inequality in the SMP not because I'm not having success in it, but because I understand that just as is the case for economic inequality, sexual inequality will have destabilizing effects on society and on my wellbeing, even if I am getting laid. Ain't nothing incoherent about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 01:09 PM
4

My guess is because we drive more is the base cause. Uh, adjusting the actuary table for rates instead of levels exactly to take care of this is trivial. This is not the explanation, sorry.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 07:11 AM
3

7/10 which is model-lite. What the hell
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/18 11:06 AM
10

And the thing is that it doesn't even matter whether it's innate or not. As long as other people will react negatively to my son showing weakness, it is in my best interest to teach him to avoid being weak in public.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 06:07 PM
8

I don't think you quite understood what I said. A insults B. B gets angry. Should A not be taught that this may happen? A cries in public. B laughs and insults him. Should A not be taught that this may happen?
/r/MensRights10/03/18 05:10 PM
3

That’s an extremely damaging thing to teach men. Is it also damaging to teach them that if they insult someone, they may react angrily? Is it damaging to teach someone that society has expectations on appropriate behavior and if you deviate from these expectations, you may face harmful consequences?
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:48 PM
16

What I don't love is when people police other people on their "manliness". I have no sons, but if I did, I would sure as shit "police their manliness" and teach them not to cry in public because other people - particularly women - will judge them as weaklings if they do. When I tell my friends to man up, it is not because I personally think there is an issue, but because I know there is nothing to be gained and everything to be lost by showing weakness in front of other people.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:29 PM
1

I wouldn't actually do this if I became a billionaire Why not though? If I was a billionaire I'd pay good money to the Buzzfeed staff for humiliating themselves.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:20 PM
2

Seriously, take the time to read what other people write. Someone could say the same about you. None of your points have anything to do with what the other guy started this thread with.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:48 AM
3

Exactly. It's so confusing how people don't get that the society that defines the future is the one with the highest birth rates and least adaptive culture because everybody else's values (and genes) will be in a museum at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/18 04:22 PM
3

It'll be ironic if it's not space threats or nuclear war that does humanity in - but the sexes utterly hating each other, and refusing to budge one inch. The thing is that it won't be humanity that collapses, just the societies that go this way, such as Sweden and Germany. The Africans and Middle Easterners will be doing just fine (well, at least in this sense) for the foreseeable future.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 11:19 AM
1

As far as I can tell, (in Europe at least), a quiet yet quite big group of women share this sentiment She's also loaded and old enough to retire - there is nothing anyone can do to pressure her short of threats of violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/18 12:26 PM
1

In the 60s lower middle class teenagers and young adults would literally sleep in the same room as their parents. Somehow they still managed to have so much sex that the whole era got labeled by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/18 04:26 PM
2

This is for sure a part of their motivation. Also, it's not just tradcon women who respond positively to or expect leadership from men. The likes of Bill Clinton and Joe Biden do very well in life because of these dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:21 PM
3

They indeed aren't but the real problem is that many women still want them to lead in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 01:11 PM
6

This is male view where quality of sex is directly related to how physically attractive their partner is. This is not how many women experience sex. "We collected self-report data from 388 women residing in the United States or in Germany. Results support the hypothesis that women mated to more attractive men are more likely to report an orgasm at the most recent copulation than are women mated to less attractive men, after statistically controlling for several key variables." Literally the firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 11:47 AM
2

She seems like the sort of person who lets her actions be governed by the fear that she might in the slightest hurt somebody's feelings - as though people are children who're easily traumatized by even the most insignificant little boo-boo, and incapable of dealing with their emotions. Seems to me that she's just projecting herself onto everybody else.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 11:45 AM
4

I think the people who are especially critical of him have a hard time imagining a man making mistakes out of insecurities and inexperience. It's just the apex male fallacy once again formulated a bit differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 11:41 AM
1

They're ethical principles we believe humans are entitled to. I believe I'm entitled to a lifetime supply of strawberry jell-o.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 11:33 AM
2

I'm saying, why do you care that some strange woman thinks you should care. That strange woman is going to force her opinions of appropriate behavior on me through changes in legislation, corporate policy and social mores.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 11:30 AM
2

The sad thing is that, while it's professional-victim feminists driving the witch hitch, the consequences of it harm non-feminist women too. Why is this sad? If they want to escape these issues, they need to choose the other side. As it is, they're having their cake and eating it.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:36 AM
11

Here's a properly done study that says exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 01:24 PM
1

They are both essentially the same. In one the children aren't fucked up by the divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 11:24 AM
3

Yes and women have accepted this, their message is: tough shit The loser men will never accept this and if it keeps on going long enough society will collapse, either because theyre rioting or playing video games instead of working.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 11:12 AM
1

How is that good for women? Because it ensures stability in society instead of violent revolt by the pussyless; the current setup in western countries is getting closer and closer to what is historically (and even today) observed in for example sub-Saharan Africa in terms of inequality between men, which is a major cause of the instability.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 03:41 PM
2

men could make their own way a hell of a lot easier than women could No, they couldn't. A working class man in the 19th century would quite normally spend 12-14 hours, 6 days per week, at the factory/mine/you name it. Do you think they would have the energy for cooking or cleaning after that? Having a household was teamwork for those not able to afford servants before the advent of washing machines etc with both parties necessary for not failing completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 10:09 AM
1

It's a precious balance, that yet somehow in my experience 99% of the people know how to handle The question is not whether I know how to behave. The question is what I should do when someone else does not (nothing, that's what). There is nothing to balance here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 02:42 PM
1

So there's a part where you should behave correctly and the other where it's your problem if you feel threatened. Everyone should behave correctly all the time, but if someone else is shitty to a third party, too bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 02:40 PM
4

I am with her here
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 12:00 PM
4

within the workplace it is irritating and does underminde your opinion a bit. Why is this anyone's problem but yours? You're irritated, you deal with it. No one - male or female - is at work so that you'd feel better or succeed in your career.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 11:48 AM
4

What? No. Unless there's a very good work-related reason, insisting on anything when someone refuses makes you the jerk. The other person has their reasons, and unless something important is going to go wrong, you respect that.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:06 PM
5

Without language there is no "two" any more thsn there is "green", "spoon" or "politics". You're conflating concepts and reality - i.e. you don't understand what it means to be socially constructed. Even more importantly, what you don't get is that results in mathematics, such as "1+1=2" are not fundamental properties of reality like the gravitational constant, but consequences of choices made by mathematicians (socially constructed!). You were already told go check out Zermelo-Fraenkel set theo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 11:34 AM
5

That's because they mathematically prove that 1 + 1 = 2 No, they do more than that. They construct the sentence from minimal logical elements. If you do not understand how that is different from proving logical claims, you do not understand what "social construction" means. but even without any humans around one rock next to another rock are two rocks. You may need to rethink your approach to mathematics, starting from understanding that the concepts of "1" and "2" require social construction. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 10:23 AM
5

Sure even our number system is a social construct, but the fact that one and one make two isn't. I don't think you quite understand what the statement "1+1=2" is. Try reading Russell & Whitehead to see how they literally construct that statement from axioms - and before doing so, construct the concepts "1", "+", "=" and "2". Edit: you need Vol. II for the construction of arithmetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 09:22 AM
14

You're suggesting transexuality should be shamed No. He's saying that the government shouldn't interfere when it is shamed. He's not saying that anyone should or should not do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 04:29 PM
3

It's a really big problem that is bizarrely overlooked in most of the literature on gender "equality." When you realize that the "literature" is a consequence of the same evolutionary process as the concern for the tampon tax, it's no longer very bizarre.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:25 AM
8

Once Playboy got going and became an established part of the American social landscape, the sexual revolution was inevitable. No, no it wasn't. The revolution was brought about by demographics and the pill; Playboy or any other cultural product has no effect on those.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 04:03 PM
1

but I think the way he treats them is colored by this You make it sound like a bad thing that he understands what many women are like.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:28 AM
6

Now that's equality even the nordic countries can't keep up with. Sure they can. In Finland women can serve in the military for the same stint that is legally obligatory for all men - and it was even legislated using exactly the same rhetoric of it being unjust if women can't fly fighter jets.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 09:40 AM
1

Lifting is great for weight loss No, no it's not. The calorie deficit you can get by lifting is nowhere the deficit that is manageable by eating less.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 02:43 PM
3

Approximately gender equal job market If anything, the job market is extremely unequal, which together with the fact that the market for daycare is nonexistent is one of the things contributing to the fact that women don't want to have children. If you don't get it, compare Norway and Italy. It's the same shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 09:40 AM
1

Honesty has the potential to be damaging.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 03:58 PM
4

is purely a social construct That's not true. Many of the "social" expressions of gender exist because the emphasize and attenuate the biological expressions; clumsy clothes for fancy women are a thing because they express biological femininity which ideally is vulnerable and impractical.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 09:33 AM
–

why would a woman want to be traditionally feminine? /r/pussypass
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 03:39 PM
3

fourth is about abolishing gender entirely. this is not a concept that only attracts uggos The only ones who have something to gain by gender being abolished are those who have difficulty in fitting the confines of gender roles. Very feminine women have everything to gain in life by there existing beauty standards. Similarly, it is in my experience very rare to find men who are both traditionally masculine and truly interested in being feminists or "allies".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 02:18 PM
5

on OKC there's an option to put "I want casual sex" under your thingy. every single woman I've ever met on there got mad at me for trying to initiate a hookup, and every single one of them said "oh i didn't meant to" when i pointed out that you set your profile to say that you wanted it. You just weren't attractive enough.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:50 PM
1

"shirtless selfies need not apply", and "if you have a shirtless pic swipe left". What are you thoughts (not judgments please) on this? They're lying; it's a test whether or not you have the spine to do what they actually like - shirtless selfies - despite them saying otherwise.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:49 PM
1

Yep. That's the whole reason for feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 10:17 AM
3

But, the same also applies to women. Not really. Men won't be vicious and hateful towards women, no matter how ugly they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:18 AM
2

Hoarding resources is a display of weakness that's based on fear. That's where.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 11:10 AM
2

Some guy is looking for trouble? I'm very obviously not able to fight back No one - not even Dwayne Johnson - is going to fight back when confronted by actual muggers with a knife. You're a deluded and solipsistic cunt if you think you or women in general are somehow different here.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:23 AM
1

Italians Your problem is that you live in a conservative catholic country where people have a strong focus on outward appearances. The same things happen in Spain and to a lesser extent France.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 04:39 PM
1

It's very, very disturbing to me that in today's culture, even if you ask a girl if she'd like to have sex and she says yes, if she isn't "enthusiastic" (whatever the fuck that means), it's still rape. The next step is that they start saying that even if it was enthusiastic, she was just pretending so that they don't get raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/17 01:10 PM
11

"be seen as inferior to every man she'll ever meet". Holy fucking hyperbole, Batman. Yes, women of class, with titles and lands and millions upon millions of dollars will be seen as inferior as they stand next to a homeless man with mental illness, just because of their sex. The thing is that the ad is not only sexist but also classist - princesses like her do not associate with riffraff or the help.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 09:46 AM
1

A two percent to five percent drop is not that big of a deal That's the not the point at all; in this case we can causally attribute it to a single root, which is what is special here. Furthermore, the finding regarding direction of the change and it's implications for future policy are quite important.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:34 PM
4

the Irish and Italian influxes into the US were remarkably similar in that they earned a reputation for being indolent freeloaders and criminals at first. The late 19th century labor markets in the US are completely different from what you have in Germany right now; there is very little chance that a significant share of the recent immigrants will be able to find jobs unless there are notable changes, such as relaxation of minimum wages so that they can be employed in no-skill positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 09:35 AM
1

It's about investor confidence. Well, not exactly. The fact that they were women might not be the problem This appears to be true and Ahern & Dittmar even point it out too. The companies seem to have been forced to hire incompetent young people who then made a mess of things.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 01:10 PM
3

Ok, you just don't get it.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 10:54 AM
1

A University of Michigan study found that in 2002 when the law was first introduced in Norway, companies saw a 2.6% drop in company value as a result of hiring women with less management skills in order to comply with the law. This is what happened as Ahern & Dittmar show and you have severe issues with reading comprehension if you think otherwise. The drop was caused by the hiring - that is the whole point of the paper and why it is so important! The part that you don't seem to get (are you dum…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 10:45 AM
21

Let's go to the source. Yes, lets. From the abstract: We find that the constraint imposed by the quota caused a significant drop in the stock price at the announcement of the law and a large decline in Tobin's Q over the following years, consistent with the idea that firms choose boards to maximize value. The quota led to younger and less experienced boards, increases in leverage and acquisitions, and deterioration in operating performance. Now, QJE, where the paper was published, happens to be …
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:39 PM
1

You don't have to show empathy but you do have to understand that large numbers of sexless young men are dangerous to society. For example: As cohort after cohort of young Asians reach marriageable age, all of them containing too few women, a huge number of men will struggle to find partners. Some will import foreign brides, thereby unbalancing the sex ratio in other, poorer countries. A great many will remain single. Some women will benefit from being more in demand. But the consequences are ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 04:15 PM
29

My country has perpetual conscription. Either you do 6 to 12 months in a uniform, 12 months scrubbing floors in a hospital or 6 months in prison. People still don't shut up about male privilege - and the funny part is that conservative women both do that and call you a loser if you didn't serve.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:25 AM
3

I am not sure by Bps are so afraid to acknowledge this side of male sexual development. Most of the women don't get it since they have no issue with getting as much sex as they like and the men are either so successful (upper class hipster Chads) they can't comprehend failure either or in denial of their own nature because they've failed so much (incels who can't admit it). When it comes to my kids, I would rather have my hand on the steering wheel. Agreed. It really is quite obvious that young …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 03:22 PM
2

teaching him that his value as a person and happiness are not determined by how much he has sex How about you teach them that their happiness is also not about whether they starve or not? That their happiness is not about whether they get punched in the dick every day?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 03:04 PM
0

I shudder to think what a female dominated White House would have looked like if hiLLary had won. Blood stains all over the Oval Office couches, that's what.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:39 AM
2

I linked a few that showed that there is simply less consensus among women That shouldn't lead to a change in the mean of the distribution and even less so to a different functional form, which is what we see in the OKCupid data.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 08:55 AM
1

It's not a random sample of businesses. Even more importantly we don't know whether or the "success" is caused by the female management or the other way around. It could also be that the corporate culture is causing both the "success" and the female management and those firms would have been equally successful with a completely male management.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:57 AM
1

I'm saying it helped That's what you said yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:19 PM
1

And now you get upset when it's pointed out that being pretty has helped you in your career, probably every step of the way? Really? Also, I think by your own admission you proved my original point and that your colleagues are right. QED I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:35 PM
1

I didn't get my current position by my looks. I'm sure you didn't. But that's not the point. (Actually, I'm not so sure about it, but I can't be bothered to go Google Scholar for papers on how attractiveness affects the probability that a trial lawyer wins or not. However, given that it affects every other field where you need to "sell" something...) The real point, which you decided to ignore: you would not be where you are now without that first job, which you got by your own admission due to …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 04:48 PM
1

If a person gets an internship based on their father's connections, and then that internship helps them get another position, do you think those connections helped with the second position?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 04:35 PM
2

And once again, it can actually hold me back if others start viewing me as the "token" pretty lawyer who everyone thinks got where I've gotten based on looks. Can you also admit that they might not be entirely wrong in this assessment?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 12:06 PM
2

I have to question why somebody would go right to bigoted attacks if they wanted to hurt someone. Why wouldn't they? You said it yourself, they want to cause hurt - why pull the punches? The thing is that they and you do not share a moral code. Most importantly you cannot infer someone's thoughts from what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 05:38 PM
2

Not necessarily. For someone to be really a racist and not just racist in the mind of a really dumb SJW, that person has to actually think that the insults are true or that black people are somehow inferior. For instance, I could call you a dumb, filthy slut who belongs in the kitchen (which you may or may not be), but unless I actually think it's true, I'm not a sexist but just a rude, obnoxious liar. I can see how this might be difficult for someone like you though; no need to apologize for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 05:29 PM
3

It's just further evidence of distinction and sexism. Everybody gets the personalized insult intended to hurt as much as possible, that's the reason for the distinction. It has nothing to do with sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 04:37 PM
2

Cuntfusion has been occasionally proposed.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/16 04:29 PM
2

I think it's just fair that if TRPs never put any nuance into their posts and just generalize everything it's okay if I do it as well. To be honest I have a difficult time in seeing what this question has to do with TRP. TRP doesn't give a shit about gender neutrality or what someone else does in general as long as it doesn't affect them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 02:32 PM
3

That's up to them of course - especially when they're old enough to understand things - but I for one would not trust the judgement of a child on this matter any more than I would trust them to understand how hard they need to work on school.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 02:26 PM
2

Why should pleasing most men come above my personal happiness? Do whatever you like, but understand that those choices will have consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 02:22 PM
3

I think a lot of anti-RPers and people who are insecure about their own count want to believe that only neckbeards and nice guys care about their partner's count That's because they want to pretend that they're not neckbeards themselves - despite the complete opposite being true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/16 09:08 AM
1

TRP can also be very dangerous and creepy if applied incorrectly. Poor squat technique is also very dangerous and creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 12:11 PM
1

You know what's even funnier? It's not a joke but an astute observation on the dual nature of women's mating preferences.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 08:31 AM
2

You are redundant.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 06:56 AM
1

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/12/22/upshot/what-2000-calories-looks-like.html?_r=0
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 02:28 PM
1

For example, various types of sugar affect your body differently. Sure. It's quite clear that even though nominally two different plates contain the same amount of energy, there are contexts - or differences between the contents of the plate - that will cause one to be absorbed differently. However, I'd at least hope everyone in this conversation by now understands that this does not mean that eating more is somehow not the same thing as eating more - you can not say that CICO does not hold beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 02:25 PM
1

Okay, I do admit that is true. I was imprecise and what I actually meant that this is not due to differences between the sexes - the effects of insulin, for example, are exactly the same for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 01:44 PM
1

CICO is a gross oversimplification of dieting. And yet true for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 12:06 PM
1

Mens' and womens' bodies look and behave differently. No. Not in this sense. A unit of energy is a unit of energy and your and mine and everybody else's stomach will treat one unit of food in exactly the same way, barring idiosyncratic differences in bacteria (which has nothing to do with sex). Your hormones will not allow you to create something out of nothing and they definitely do not affect energy absorption. Women are also SUPPOSED to have more fat than men. Sure. But this has nothing to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 09:06 AM
1

It's only recently that muscle mass is seen as attractive in women I think it's more that it's only recently that people have realized that some muscle together with low body fat is attractive in women. If you look at models and actresses from 70s and 80s, they definitely had "tone" - i.e. they had lifted weights. It's just that most people are very clueless about how that is achieved; many think that you can look like a girl from Baywatch simply by losing weight, leading to eating disorders ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 08:54 AM
2

Well you're not entitled to common courtesy. And you're not entitled to not being spat on and called a cunt after you reject them, whether you were kind or not. You're not even entitled to me not calling you a dumb cunt right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 08:47 AM
2

The whole point of having protocol to follow is that every case gets the same attention Typical police protocol is that frivolous cases are not investigated. Why is that not appropriate here?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 10:48 AM
14

It seems when it comes to women we subconsciously invent victim narratives to explain their bad behaviour. This is a well documented phenomenon.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 08:06 AM
0

You have the hateful Alt-Right and the irrational Ctrl-Left. Both are fear driven. The "alt-right" (what a dumb term) are people from chans. They're doing it for the lulz.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 11:27 AM
1

super easy to tell Yeah, you keep telling yourself that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 10:30 AM
1

Just as some women don't disclose N, do you think those men disclose their criteria, especially given how un-PC "slut shaming" (which this isn't) is right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 09:44 AM
0

But his case has nothing to do with TRP and all to do with the physiological phenomena related to muscular development. If anything, it's pretty much off topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 05:58 PM
1

Why are you arguing this case here? Try r/fitness instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 01:35 PM
4

the whole point of a movement is to end gender subjugation Oh you sweet summer child.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 10:37 AM
5

How would that even be constitutional? Or: how about we start requiring that all parties have 10% labor union members as candidates? 10% Jews? 10% gay people? 10% boy scouts?
/r/MensRights13/09/16 04:14 PM
1

Sure. But no one who is a brute following orders is an alpha. The real "behavioural" alpha is the one who behaves so that they get to give those orders.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 09:29 AM
1

And I think it's incredibly naive to call those genetic losers, those dregs of society anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 09:27 AM
1

This is the part where we manipulate you to die for us and our money.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 09:25 AM
1

They are behavioural alphas, not status alphas You don't get to be a status alpha like a CEO unless you can convince other men that you should be there, nor were you going to keep your inherited kingdom unless you actually were able to keep your underlings in check - i.e. convince them that you should be there. No, cops and soldiers are the real betas of society and have always been. They're the dumb dumbs that the real alphas use to get what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 09:22 AM
1

You demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of what makes you successful in business. Hint: in reality the people who make it to the top are the complete opposite of the childish stereotype some red pillers - who obviously come from lower middle class backgrounds at best - think are good ideas for interacting with other talented men. Engineering training is an education that will drill down into you exactly those things, like hard work by yourself when necessary. Have you ever worked in a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 09:19 AM
4

If women benefit less from monogamy, why do they insist on it? The monogamy - as dictated by modern family law - they insist on is not true monogamy, but monogamy-lite, where they get to choose when it ends with very little negative consequence. Compare to 19th century, when it was both very difficult to get a divorce and very painful economically to the wife. In most places there aren't even any consequences to infidelity. Modern women do not want to commit, they want men to commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 11:17 AM
5

The answer isn't to go extreme in the other direction This isn't extreme, it's fact.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:00 PM
1

You can presume to know whatever you want about sports, but reality will not change - and the reality is that different bodies respond differently to exercise. Yes, but the response to not using a certain muscle is zero. So, again, if they all they did was curls and pushups, they did not get "fit" in any traditional sense. This is not a question of different bodies or genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 07:50 AM
2

When the best argument you can come up with is offhand dismissal, that's when you've lost. What? Why? That makes no sense and if you think it was an "offhand dismissal" you only reveal that you have absolutely no idea about sports.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 07:35 AM
2

with a decent amount of muscle With pushups, curls and running? No, they were not. Stop lying. Edit: you said before that you don't have the time. Why don't you make up your mind and lie a bit less?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 09:42 PM
1

Well whatever it is, you're making an active choice not to go to the gym. I know at least two people who got fit by pigging out on protein rich junk food, doing some pushups and curls three times a week and morning jog every other day. It really is that easy for some lucky people. I didn't notice this part before, but either they're lying or you have some really weird definition of fit. Doing those things simply will not get you anything but biceps and lungs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 02:19 PM
5

and my regular hobbies Ah, so you have time? Maybe spend less of it on Call of Duty?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 02:08 PM
1

The only thing that could be construed as trolling is the extreme he takes it to. Why would I buy someone a house if I'm not getting the things I want in return? Also, your interpretation of it as trolling is childish, as it has to be clear to you too what the real point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 10:09 AM
0

I wouldn't be surprised to find out that some of our higher execs do coke off of hookers asses I'm sure that's true here also. The boss of the boss of my boss is actually a blood relative of a certain individual recently embroiled in an international scandal involving bunga bunga, and I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear that he's done similar shit. Those guys are the real alphas here, and they are so fucking far from the red pill ideal it's not even funny how wrong the silly kids are on mascu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 06:09 PM
0

Keep in mind, this is a rather large financial institution. Well, I'm in a central bank, where the expectation is that even lowest level of managers for talent have suits - but no one here would give two shits if someone did coke off a hooker in a BDSM club as long as it was kept private.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 05:13 PM
0

Either you really are the outlier here or your corporate culture is very different from what we have in Europe. No one would expect anything or care about your private life here unless you were in a very public outward facing role. In some places traditionally not even then.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 04:56 PM
2

Quite; that's hypergamy and the soft harems of the upper middle class in action.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 04:42 PM
1

I've seen first hand that he does VERY will with the types of women that look for the club promoter type You mean that type of woman no one with any sense in them would want to have as the mother of their child? Yes, it's clearly a class thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 04:35 PM
1

To be honest I think you're now overestimating the difference between you (or more precisely the average IT person, you could of course be an outlier) and the bosses of the units you do IT for, especially if you're in the US. I'm in Europe, and the difference between the support staff and "talent" is probably bigger than in the US, but at least for the junior "talent" like me and my colleagues EDM or playing in a metal band is a perfectly normal thing - and the thing is that some of us are going…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 04:28 PM
7

I am solidly upper middle class with a high-paying white collar job and wine tasting as a hobby, and I agree with many red pill points. The girls I went to grad school with - who now have similar UMC lives - definitely reacted positive to red pill methods, just as predicted. For example, even among these "intellectuals" lifting makes a difference, with thick biceps getting commented on post-sex. However, in many ways your assessment is correct. For example, red pill has these really strange idea…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 09:57 AM
3

No, he's not. The point is that there really are some species that are monogamous in the sense that the vast, vast majority will only procreate with one other individual, ever. This does not happen at the same scale in other species, humans included. Therefore by the biologists' definition at species level humans are not monogamous, even if some individuals find success by doing so. Hence monogamy is not a "natural state" for humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 01:43 PM
0

What if you don't meet any girls through your social circle? Find a new social circle. It really is not any harder than that, whether you find it daunting or not (which is also definitely not because you're an "introvert").
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 11:01 AM
1

Huh? You think that evolved preferences for health change in 500 years? What the hell?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 07:48 PM
1

men wanted a healthy, non-malnourished woman as a wife So why wouldn't that still be true? It is clear that somebody with body fat % of 35% is unhealthy, and there is no amount of social reprogramming that will change that. Just because men in the past thought that a certain thing attractive because it signals some health does not mean that the men of today should (or even could!) prefer women that are obviously - at a very primal level - unhealthy. Heck, the logic can even be extended so that i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 10:01 AM
5

r/thathappened
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:17 AM
2

The second is problematic because it starts asserting what are biased conclusions about why things may go awry, and the conclusion, of course, is inherent female fickleness and disloyalty. How do you know that the cause is not true? I don't think there's any solid evidence either way; calling it a biased conclusion is a in fact a biased conclusion in it self.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:03 AM
5

When homosexuality is completely accepted, men might be okay with more touching. This is nothing but speculation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 10:46 AM
3

I am saying your analogy is false No, it's not. Whether or not people die because they do not receive something is irrelevant here for the concept of "deserving". You have done absolutely nothing to show the falsehood. Not that it matters, but even the point You won't even be in pain from not having sex. is debatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:21 PM
5

So now you're saying that people deserve that? How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:05 PM
7

Do people "deserve" to eat? I suppose not, in the literal sense, yet if we prevented someone from eating we would be called monsters - not to mention that many people on the political left definitely argue that transfers from the government to ensure that everyone gets food are a human right. Do you think they're wrong? Or maybe you now realized that your argument on semantics is actually quite stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:21 PM
5

Amnesty hasn't cared about political prisoners since at least this cunt was made secretary general.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:04 AM
53

Wait, was the father returned to the mother?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 03:46 PM
1

Everyone should have a chance to get the job they want without judgement. Does this necessarily imply that fields become less segregated? Because the practical experience is that the opposite happens: in Scandinavia where people are very much able to choose the field they like, segregation is stronger now than it was in say, the 70s.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 01:51 PM
7

Well, I definitely think femininity is quite similar to childishness, so... maybe.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:11 PM
43

Women want to play slut but not get sexual attention. Reward without responsibility is one of the defining features of femininity.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:29 AM
3

the 'spensive gym and a personal trainer not the crappy gym and /r/fitness /r/fitness is a much better source of both inspiration and information than even an expensive personal trainer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:15 AM
2

It just seems so important to so many girls, that it feels incredibly vulnerable to think about revealing myself in that regard. Never, ever tell a woman you've less partners than they do. There is absolutely nothing to gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 11:44 AM
-1

I don't think you quite understand what the word "objective" means.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:09 PM
4

Did you notice that they said those 100k are in the US? Your links have nothing to do with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 10:47 AM
-2

And the nazi flag isn't racist either, whatever the nazis did.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:41 PM
-3

It's not racist and you're a kook too.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:40 PM
11

right wing Republicans and Fox News always talking about it and always defending the use of the confederate flag I'm a leftwing European and I think you're a kook, even worse than Fox News.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:58 AM
2

Imo its because upper class marriages are business decisions made at the tale end of a womans reproductive window, and large numbers involve whipped betas these women know they can control. Or perhaps upper class women (and men) are not as terrible as lower class women (and men)? Perhaps there's indeed a correlation between being upper class and having the sense of not divorcing?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 11:48 AM
1

did not require rape for sexual release He probably still did it, or at the very least would have done if a given woman was not compliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/15 12:17 PM
6

What is your goal? trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 10:51 AM
3

By being weird and demanding. You need to let her go if that's what she wants, not bitch like a little boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 11:26 PM
3

I thought about writing Gale a letter to let her know how I feel. This kills the friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 01:41 PM
3

We are talking about maintaining a safe learning environment. So why aren't the police and the courts handling that? Why not make it so that employers are responsible for maintaining safe working environments with Pete the janitor heading the kangaroo court?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 01:20 AM
5

Ironically, it's precisely this federal funding that forces them to engage in craziness like using "preponderance of evidence" for their rape decisions instead of "beyond a reasonable doubt". That makes no sense. Most universities worldwide receive significant amounts of money from their host countries (many are even legally part of the state), but as far as I can tell the United States is the only place where they participate in criminal justice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 01:17 AM
1

The reason why this is not well known is the same reason why experiences of non-white women in general are not well publicized - racism and white priviledge. You'd think the dumbasses in Jezebel would then heed their own advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 01:07 PM
0

Some boys get hard at age 10. Apparently they can't rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 01:27 PM
2

Social democrat is a progressive lol no You're confusing social democracy here with a lot of things. I'd point out the fag-hating conservative social democrats in my Scandinavian home country, but that would be too much effort. Dude, get out of the conversation. You have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/14 01:35 PM
6

Yes, that is exactly the same as not being social democratic. Like I said, you're moving the goal posts, step by step.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/14 12:52 PM
7

Switzerland is the opposite of a social democrat country. What? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/14 12:32 PM
5

If that isn't moving the goal posts I don't know what is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/14 11:17 AM
2

I assume that by talking about how it is actually offensive and disruptive, some more well meaning catcallers are disillusioned and will stop. I've been given shit for asking the time on the street. What this project does is make me even more cautious of talking to strange women on the street because I'm afraid of their reaction. It also informs more males who might not realize how disruptive it is to try and get their friends who may be doing it to stop No. This really isn't my problem, and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/14 02:15 PM
1

The causality is that more intelligent women are likely to have more education now (as a consequence of feminism) and more educated women are less likely to have children, as they are working harder (as a consequence of feminism).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 12:14 PM
0

They do not have the same issues being accepted by the media and mainstream society that MRAs do. Yes they do. I'm from Finland, and generally agree with /u/hmlaasanen. However, his somewhat red pill opinions on the sexual marketplace (which he's been talking about since 2001 on his blog, longer than anyone else I'm aware of; heck, he pretty much had the red pill/blue pill and alpha/beta division between men covered already in 2002) have pretty much ensured that he's widely regarded either as a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/14 09:22 AM
1

So there can't be several groups of actual socialists that compete for legitimacy and power at the same time? TIL
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/14 09:01 AM
2

Then again, it's kind of hard for me to see what this Jacob Levy has done wrong here; if my girlfriend told me that she had been raped I'd definitely tell her to press charges or GTFO. Why? If she doesn't, it's 100% sure she was cheating instead. tl;dr Levy was just covering his own ass.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:53 PM
1

Except it's just about always a long thought out decision. I suppose you disagree, but I for one would rather have 1000 women have to wait for a day than have a single abortion happen because of rash decisions, emotional duress or coercion. You can keep on going being a bitch about other peoples misfortune because "it's your body" though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 01:45 PM
2

I believe in gentleman ideals. Behaving classy and polite. Ah, you're a neckbeard. Do you tip your fedora at m'ladies too?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 05:33 PM
2

Well, quite clearly you're not much of a man, but that point aside, no, you don't. Other people use them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 03:35 PM
14

Male space should not equal primitive, stupid, testosterone-crazy locker room type male space I don't think you get to decide what male space is like. That's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 02:01 PM
3

I don't think Irigaray's work is relevant here, but I wasn't the one who brought it up. Sure it is. It's strong evidence of the existence of delusional, harmful feminists in academia. Have you studied philosophy - the philosophy of science is a very different thing to science. Let's not get them confused. I fail to see how this is relevant. In fact, I find your argument in defense of Irigaray to be quite Sokalesque in nature; by accident, you're practicing cargo cult philosophy of matters you do…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 03:26 PM
4

I really don't understand what that has to do with what we're discussing. Irigaray clearly doesn't understand one bit about what she's talking about, and I'm not sure you do either. Sure, you can define the limit properly and get new results. Does that mean that you can think about fluid mechanics as "feminine"? No. No you cannot, and the fact that this kook does is pretty strong evidence that she's projecting her own insanity into her work. Also, thinking about sets and limits properly is no in…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 02:46 PM
7

her assertion of a sexed equation was a comment on the epistemology of the philosophy of science - that is to say within the philosophy of science qua qua, there exists a propositional logic that Irigaray is unpacking in reference to extant structures of Western thought considered axiomatic and asking if it's actually an uncertain and subjective experience Sounds a bit like this guy. Do we find "basic" maths basic simply because we're more familiar with it? Only someone who hasn't advanced beyon…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 02:31 PM
-1

I deeply appreciate the downvote brigade I downvoted you for hopping on the bandwagon and still would.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 09:45 AM
0

"I'm a banana and I know a lot about hanging on a tree and I agree". Did I contribute something?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/14 10:48 AM
2

Ah, the famous no true feminist defense. Masterful.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/14 05:16 PM
0

You still didn't answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 03:36 PM
0

And I think it's extremely insulting and demeaning of you to think that that's somehow something less important. Also, you didn't answer the question. Can gays be fixed or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 03:27 PM
0

I don't believe in biological 'truths', and I don't believe that human behaviour and instinct is set in stone. So you think that gays can be "fixed"?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 01:02 PM
5

Just because there are mean and demeaning feminists doesn't mean feminism is bunk. There are very few "nice" feminists who are willing to tell the "mean" feminists to shut the fuck up and get out of the movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 12:46 PM
2

It has plenty to do with showing that there is a good reason to wait for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/14 09:13 AM
0

transferring blame/responsibility Accepting that not getting women is your own fault is one of the biggest tenets of TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 06:11 AM
1

TRP does not care about that in the least as the main question is optimal heterosexual strategy for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 02:12 PM
1

If the British empire hadn't been brought to it's knees by WWII, Gandhi would never had a chance. Heck, most likely he would have been assassinated and that would have been that for his movement, if only the horrors of the war hadn't killed Europe's appetite for violence. He and his approach are completely overrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 01:08 PM
1

You were the definition of snide. If he tells you he isn't snide, he isn't. You failing to grasp that point is why the conversation crashed and burned.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/14 08:21 AM
10

TRP being a huge advocate of them (including men not having feelings). No, TRP is a huge advocate of whatever works. If what breaking gender stereotypes was a valid strategy in the sexual marketplace, TRP would advocate that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/14 10:05 AM
3

How can congress possibly represent the people if they're not representative of the population? Representatives in parliaments are typically also taller, older and better educated than the general populace. Is this also a problem? Should we have midgets, children and elementary school dropouts elected so that the parliamentarians are "representative"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 05:52 PM
1

Only people who were once unattractive but became attractive know what changes they made and can have others make the same changes. Well, people who were once attractive and now are not can also be used as a data point for what to do and what not to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 06:22 AM
3

I consider myself to be a BP male and I am 1.80m and 62kg. So instead of fat you're unhealthily thin?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 06:14 AM
7

The vast majority of serious research in this matter points in the other direction, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/14 04:08 PM
2

"Money."
/r/TheRedPill14/10/13 12:50 PM
0

You completely misunderstood that table. That 0.8981 is the t-statistic on a parameter estimate relating the effect of an additional year of education a black woman has on the probability of the wife initiating divorce. The actual effect is 0.007. Anybody with any education in statistics would now conclude that the wife's education is actually not a statistically significant predictor of the wife initiating the divorce. And those who don't have any training in the matter can look at the stars in…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 01:41 PM
1

It's hard to say for sure that birth control caused a change, because in some sense, it's natural for a relationship to be hot and heavy at the outset and then settle into a routine. In my case it's very easy to tell that it wasn't routine and boredom - as soon as her period returned, we started having just as much sex as before.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/13 07:00 AM
0

Well, obviously there are going to be anecdotes going both ways, and I'll admit that I also have only a single data point. Yet I'd say that the point still stands - (some) women change preference regarding men depending on hormonal effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/13 06:58 AM
0

Have you ever seen (or dated) the same woman with and without birth control? My ex started taking them, and said it out quite clearly that she didn't find me attractive at all. That really made her (and me) realize that I was the person she wanted at peak fertility. It got so bad that she stopped taking them so that she'd actually want sex again.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/13 01:18 PM
24

connotative dissonance ITYM "cognitive dissonance"
/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 12:01 PM
1

You're being sarcastic, right?
/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 05:53 AM
1

Because it's a bitch move. Can you imagine what the other woman must have felt?
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 02:13 PM
9

It's not a troll reply.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 10:34 AM
6

I don’t remember what I said to her initially. I have never in my life seen a more “fuck me right now” look on a girls face, Uh, no. You were too drunk to understand what was going on.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 08:03 AM
13

Don't be boring. Be interesting and different. That's amazingly useful advice.
/r/seduction08/06/13 03:14 PM
1

Stranger? Talking to your kids? Why not reverse it? Call the cops on him, accuse him of trying to molest them. That should teach him to mind his own business.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:08 PM
1

Downvoting for tone, not for the informative source. Downvoting for shitty downvoting.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:42 PM
2

It's in Australia, like Google or reading the ad carefully would have told you.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:30 PM
4

Unless A is doing something illegal, B has no right to enforce a demand for A to stop doing whatever they're doing. That is all. Somebody makes you uncomfortable but it isn't illegal? Tough luck.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:41 AM
7

You can't blame the motorists, who thought they were doing the right thing. So now the right thing is to start beating people up based on a hunch or an instinct? I think you'd make a fine police officer.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:25 PM
7

It's fairly obvious that the reason she got downvoted has nothing to do with Jezebel.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter