harpyprincess Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	What’s the most controversial negative opinion you have about your own gender? That we keep gaslighting each other and everyone else that there's some kind of sisterhood and all our troubles come from men. I've been abused more by fellow women including my own mother than I ever have men. No men aren't a unique threat to me. If caution is warrented it's towards any human, not just men specifically. It's dangerous to believe otherwise. I refuse to reduce caution or presume more a less a need for any simply because of gender and I refuse to trust a fellow woman simply becaus…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/06/26 07:28 PM
2	The stay at home wife is not traditional and is mostly a myth. How in the world did you interpret what he said to mean or imply that? I'm struggling to figure out your logic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/06/26 12:37 AM
6	Has anyone noticed that there’s a correlation about the treatment of men and racism from the left? Or daughters like myself who loved their father who was destroyed by their abusive mother.	/r/MensRights	14/05/26 02:22 AM
16	Senator John Fetterman says Democrats are becoming anti-men and warns of a male voter exodus Or they get excommunicated. Like is happening to him.	/r/MensRights	11/05/26 01:34 PM
1	Far too many men cannot see that they have undesirable trait's and behaviors which results in not just nobody wanting to be around them but nobody wanting to date them either and it's an issue which will follow many for their entire life. No I didn't. You misread. Try again.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/05/26 03:23 AM
0	Far too many men cannot see that they have undesirable trait's and behaviors which results in not just nobody wanting to be around them but nobody wanting to date them either and it's an issue which will follow many for their entire life. I don't think that about men at all. I don't accept your charicature of most men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/26 06:27 PM
1	Far too many men cannot see that they have undesirable trait's and behaviors which results in not just nobody wanting to be around them but nobody wanting to date them either and it's an issue which will follow many for their entire life. This is true for us women too. That's why we're moving further and further away from each other. We're not going to get anywhere on either side with one sided accountability. It's why so many of the men we do want use us as fuck toys. We aren't worth keeping to them because like those men you're criticizing, that's how those men see us. Difference is, we're at least functional as a sex toy. But even they are starting to turn us away. But sure, let's continue pretending this is just a man problem…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/26 04:05 AM
4	If feminists truly cared about abuse and r*pe victims they wouldn't be silencing male victims and excusing female abusers Yeah, I really wish people would stop pretending feminists speak for all us women or that all women accept their framing of what the fight for equality should look like, or where our percieved problems come from and our priorities in combating them. They are an advocacy group with very specific philosophies that go beyond just seeking equality. They aren't THE equality movement by any reasonable standards and should stop trying to claim a monopoly on it just because equality is ONE of their clai…	/r/MensRights	17/04/26 08:47 AM
1	Women Aren't a Monolith is Just "Not All Men" for Women. Technically it's Men aren't a Monolith for men. You can just switch the gender you know. People do it all the time. You can do people aren't a monolith even and get everybody.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/04/26 07:19 PM
5	The "Patriarchy" Causes Misandry? They feed each other and fuel the fire. The concept they are the only way to start said fire is however absurd. Irrational hate is not a gendered emotion. That said patriarchy isn't feminism its the delusion of feminism that leadership would improve if we replaced noble men with noble women. No wait you're kind of right.	/r/MensRights	13/03/26 07:10 PM
4	Just a Reminder that there are Many Women who support us and oppose feminism and that blaming all women for Men's issues is completely misguided. Eh, same problem feminism has. It can't truly support equality unless it centers both genders, and feminism or men's rights the name itself will constantly step on it's own toes and create a bias or the perception therof, both internally and externally. I'm not against the existence of the men's rights movement despite that, feminism exists, and counter balances are necessary. Nor do I disbelieve many of both men's rights and feminists believe in the equality for everyone claims of their movemen…	/r/MensRights	12/03/26 04:27 AM
34	Just a Reminder that there are Many Women who support us and oppose feminism and that blaming all women for Men's issues is completely misguided. We get called "Pick me's" and stuff. You see us around now and then. Though I wouldn't call myself "men's" rights so much as human rights. I can't stand feminist hypocrisy, misandry or mysogyny, nor divisive oversimplifications like the "patriarchy." Men fought with us for our rights, and I'm not one to forget that when men are struggling too. We get nothing fighting against rather than for each other.	/r/MensRights	12/03/26 12:10 AM
14	"everyone is a feminist until war breaks out and conscription begins" Irrelevant to the fight itself. We women needed men on our side to get our rights, obviously they need us too. Or do you propose the fight for equal rights should be a one sided affair? Doesn't seem like a good path to achieving equality. Almost seems contradictory even.	/r/MensRights	02/03/26 05:54 AM
0	Wanting people to be honest that they just want sex is not the same thing as being sex negative. Which not everyone is. Which is where many men and women's trauma comes from. People with different natures coming into conflict. Sure there are people that like casual sex. But many that engage in it don't, they do it because it's the only touch/connection they can get, not everything they want but better than nothing. Both kinds of people exist and they end up with each other and bad shit happens. The people for whom sex is more, be they man or woman, gets hurt by people for whom emotional att…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/02/26 06:02 PM
0	Wanting people to be honest that they just want sex is not the same thing as being sex negative. Yeah, no. You're not a mind reader. Lots of people want love and relationships, not just sex. People come in more variety. I like sex, but I prefer it with someone I love. Your insistence everyone just wants sex with zero emotional attachment is simply bullshit. Both kinds of people and people inbetween exist. It's a spectrum. And to be clear amongst men and women both.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/02/26 05:38 PM
0	Wanting people to be honest that they just want sex is not the same thing as being sex negative. Different people want different things. But that's complicated and requires understanding and accepting a nuanced world. So instead it's easier to just force people into simple molds and call them all liars if they dare to insist they don't fit it. Heaven forbid people have different natures from each other that often comes in conflict.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/02/26 04:14 PM
1	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. I already explained that. Proof you're not really reading what I'm saying.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/26 09:32 PM
1	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. It says absolutely nothing about your average man. Predators come in both genders. And they're once much rarer than you think or the world would be a very different place. But I think we're done. I'm going to agree to disagree. Can't argue with projective mind reading required generalizations anyway.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/26 09:04 PM
1	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. It's normal for both men and women to do so. It's ultra fucking rare for either gender for that to be end all of how they see each other, or what they want out of relationships or life overall. I'm going to need some serious proof that outside of the west men are all psychopaths incapable of compassion or empathy for their fellow human. Which is what would actually be required to ONLY see us as sex objects. Don't confuse having options and shopping around with lack of desire for more. Sure some …	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/26 08:35 PM
1	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. Both for different reasons. Obscured vision is bad. With one you fail to trust someone you should, and the other someone you shouldn't and both can lead to travesty and death. Also please be clear, who exactly do you think I was calling assholes, because you're doing some of that assume the worst mind reading shit.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/26 08:18 PM
1	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. If you say so. You have no proof of this nonsense. It's all assumptions that rely on mind reading. It also requires reality that clearly doesn't exist. If the majority of men wanted us to be nothing more than sex objects/slaves we would be. We aren't because they are outnumbered by men that see differently. That care about theit mothers, their sisters, their daughters, their grandmothers and their girlfriends and wives. They can't, these kind of men require the shadows to succeed for a reason. Y…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/26 08:11 PM
1	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. That's an absurd take. When all someone has is a picture that's all they have to go on. How should men feel in the same sense then? We get millions of matches compared to their few. They could use the same argument to call us just as shallow if not more so, as they tend to get less matches. Who's really more shallow if you want to play with that dumb shit? Imagine using a shallow dating site both men and women use more for hook ups than actual dating to determine shit about anything. No it's mis…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/26 07:57 PM
1	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. You put a lot of words in my mouth I did not say, and added implications I did not imply. I have no way of responding to you, because I have no idea how to untangle what you seem to think you have read compared to what I actually said or meant. I view humans as an ultimately neutral species. Both men and women. Try reading it again with that in mind. I think that "might" help, but I'm not sure. Complex means variable, we range from self sacrificing saints to complete murderous psychopaths that e…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/26 07:25 PM
3	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. When was the last time you saw a fellow woman dating their literal sex toy? Meanwhile we see men marrying and going on fake dates with their sex dolls. You're not a mind reader. Stop projecting on men what they feel or want. They have as much right to reject you after sex as you do men. Why you not chastising the women that jump from relationship to relationship? Men have as much right to feel the same as you when women do that. Why you giving your fellow women a pass? We don't compliment men to…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/02/26 04:00 PM
5	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. Yeah my bi ass has been both abused and treated well by both genders. I find people that think either being treated well or abused by your partner is a gendered thing weird as hell. People get so caught up in gender wars they forget at the end of the day we're all humans and unique individuals.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/02/26 11:20 PM
11	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. I'm not going to project on men what most do privately to make them look bad in my mind. You don't know what most men do or how they feel. Are they more visually oriented, sure, but that just determines what sexualy attracts them, not how they feel about the individual once they are. They could say the same about us and status (which many do obviously) and the stereotype would be just as accurate. Many of us will ignore huge red flags if the man has enough status, same as many men will for women…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/02/26 09:59 PM
9	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. You mean like a human being I judge as an individual based upon their actions? Like a stranger worthy of caution until proven otherwise, but given the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise while in a safe environment with others I trust? To not assume they should be trusted alone unless the situation does not allow for otherwise, until trust is earned? What exactly should I do differently? The mistake would be doing otherwise. A fellow woman is just as capable of being dangerous or leading…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/02/26 09:18 PM
54	Apparently, men dehumanizing women is a normal part of male sexuality. That most men just want us for sex alone claim is misandry. It completely dehumanizes men as complex emotional beings with the same desire for love, companionship and support we desire. But like us, those with options tend to be pickier in their pursuit of that. So generalizing men for what a minority of men do (because they can), which are those most pursued with the most options, who themselves may just be being picky and shopping around, no differently than we do (If we can) is rightfully que…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/02/26 07:28 PM
4	They still don’t get it, still blaming some bogeymen for the rightward political shift of young men I don't blame men. I'm a woman and I don't trust them*. If your entire sale is equality for all while ignoring blatant discrimination from your own side towards literally half of humanity, well I don't believe you. And if I were the one being discriminated against, that would be doubly so. Them being the people doing this, not men in case is unclear. Got a response that was immediately deleted. I think they responded then realized what I meant. So in case there's any other confusion.	/r/MensRights	23/02/26 05:00 PM
1	From Past Patriarchy to Modern Dating: Why the Red Pill Backlash? I think fighting to be better than nature to create a society that better serves all of us, through trial, error and data collection is one of our greatest strengths. I think fighting our natural instincts and being able to plan long term, and recognize trade offs between short term benefit over long term benefits matters. I think these conversations need to happen, because life isn't perfect and demanding and expecting perfectioin is bad for all of us. None of us are perfect yet we think we des…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/02/26 02:48 PM
2	From Past Patriarchy to Modern Dating: Why the Red Pill Backlash? Nature pill is the worst pill. Rape is natural, eating your kids is natural, killing the kids of your spouse if you replaced their spouse is natural, cannibalism is natural. Nature gives no fucks natural beings rape dead baby bodies on the regular. Strength and power is natural. Men enslaving us and forcing us to bear children can be natural. I'd rather not submit to nature, because once you do, you give permission for others to do the same and men are stronger than us. If you appeal to nature c…	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/02/26 06:36 PM
2	The "patriarchy" is a boogeyman used to justify hatred and abuse towards men. Define dominance of men. Because I don't see it in the US at least. I don't feel any men here have any dominance over me that isn't almost entirely nepotist rather than male based. Most men are irrelevant, and women with the right relations can be just as powerful as any man. Again, cause if nepotistic reasons. It's been us all slowly fighting for our rights against nepotists for centuries. Historically speaking as soon as the common man got the vote from these people, because unlike us women th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/01/26 03:57 PM
-1	The "patriarchy" is a boogeyman used to justify hatred and abuse towards men. Again nothing going inately because "males" are in charge. It's because it's how the nepotists benefit themselves at the expense of both men and women. It's not patriarchy. Male has nothing to do with it. Both men and women are used and manipulated in different ways to their benefit, not the benefit of men or women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/01/26 03:41 PM
2	The "patriarchy" is a boogeyman used to justify hatred and abuse towards men. The problem is by calling it the "patriarchy" You're labeling it as an inevitable outcome of men being in charge while recognizing most men choose to be more egalitarian than that. It's nepotism not "patriarchy" and replacing these people with their wives and daughters is not going to fix anything. It's purposely shifting the blame to gender rather than the actual people, which is an absurdly small fucking number that has, nothing to do the majority of humanity, and lives in ways most could only…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/01/26 03:36 PM
7	Gaming is a vital frontier (unfortunately) in the struggle (if it's even happening) to stop feminist revisionism & attempts to conquer male spaces No they don't and they were delusional to think the could and strategically retarded for trying. They've done nothing but created enemies, extreme pushback and awakened non political people to enter politics against them. All of which was completely unnecessary as half the shit they're pushing other women or minorities don't want either.	/r/MensRights	22/01/26 04:32 PM
0	Can the far left be MRAs? Do you consider yourself far left?	/r/MensRights	18/01/26 04:51 AM
2	My philosophy/beliefs regarding men and women in the United States. Easiest most obvious strategy that way too many people refuse to acknowledge for some strange fucking reason.	/r/MensRights	03/01/26 04:57 AM
5	This was just so heart breaking and unfortunate to see Original poster being dogpiled, is a woman. Many people here chastising the dogpilers here are women. You: "All women are like the dogpilers." Stop gaslighting yourself and feeding into the cycle of abuse. We only win when both sides start treating each other as individuals and bad actions as bad regardless of the what shallow ass traits like gender, skin color or sexuality they have.	/r/MensRights	16/11/25 01:56 PM
1	Patriarchy exists to cover up for failures of women who are losers We women have our own privileges unique to us in society too. Different privileges and different expectations. These have evolved and changed over time. Also there are privileges minorities recieve that you don't as well. For reasons that have nothing to do with anything you personally have ever done. When we start arguing over who's more privileged instead of how to actually lift each other up, we all lose. It's becomes a bizarro dick waving contest where the winner is who can prove they have t…	/r/MensRights	15/11/25 09:40 AM
9	Patriarchy exists to cover up for failures of women who are losers Depends on what one means by equal. It can be pretty vague, and complicated in scenarios where outcomes are different, which is where your fairness comes in. Like the abortion debate. Obviously men don't have a womb so it complicates the question of what's a true equal and fair solution to the whole choice debate and what outcomes, rights, and expectations come with that choice for all parties. But yeah, replacing equal with fair, is, well fair enough. But that doesn't make equality a bad thing …	/r/MensRights	14/11/25 05:46 PM
21	Patriarchy exists to cover up for failures of women who are losers Yeah they aren't and as usual when men have had enough society has started reversing course. Feminists are retarded. They don't get how power works. It must be backed by force, and men have that in spades compared to us. Without men being on our side we'd have none of our rights, and without men fighting for theirs, they'd have none either. Pushing men away and demonizing their entire gender was and is the most dumb fuck thing feminism has ever done. It's nepotism, always has been, gender wars e…	/r/MensRights	14/11/25 04:49 PM