TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hashtagwindbag Archive

View 0 posts and 99 comments by hashtagwindbag on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

The Spacey Maneuver.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:38 PM
-1

Do you really expect someone to be insulted and just take it? Yeah, dude. It's the internet.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:07 PM
1

I didn't say breast size is the only thing that matters to me. It is by your own admission a single attribute which can entirely disqualify someone as a potential mate. So although it's not fair to say that it's the only attribute you consider in a mate, it is fair to say that you are willing to rule someone out based solely on that one attribute. That's exactly what a dealbreaker is. Frankly I don't really care what you do. And I don't know why others in this thread care so much what you do. Bu…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:07 AM
2

aka twitter bullshit
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:16 PM
6

Is he allowed to estimate the density of his son and then just measure how much volume he displaces from a tub of liquid?
/r/MensRights10/02/19 12:11 AM
3

stop appropriating deaf culture
/r/MensRights07/02/19 11:10 PM
3

If I'm being honest it's a little funny, too. We're hypocrites if we can laugh at them but can't laugh at ourselves.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 10:50 PM
9

tfw no infantry sabers allowed on planes
/r/MensRights09/12/18 10:48 PM
1

First posted 29 Jun 2017 Just pointing out that this is over a year old. Anyway, I wonder how much of this difference is due to how people sell themselves. If we're to accept the idea that men who get paid more do so because they are more aggressive negotiators, it stands to reason that the same salesmanship might also have an effect on how they compose a c.v. compared to how a woman might compose a c.v. Men continue to outnumber women at senior ranks of the public service, despite vastly outnum…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:55 PM
7

Gotcha buddy.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:55 PM
2

Be awkward Way ahead of you.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:07 AM
2

I genuinely can not accept a compliment in any way. I will instinctively ignore the compliment or turn it into self-deprecation. How does one even accept a compliment? Saying "thank you" seems weird and dismissive. But going more in-depth just seems egotistical. And asking for clarification would be considered fishing for more compliments. I don't know what to do.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:55 PM
5

If the problem is as simple as having a poor education and choosing a more lucrative line of work, then can't that be easily remedied in a rehabilitative system?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:19 PM
4

How do you know recidivism isn't an outcome of a punitive system?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:45 PM
4

Ah, the good ol' "our behavior is set in stone, we're not responsible for it, therefore change your behavior, you're responsible for it" trope.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:18 PM
2

I checked out some more of the blog. She believes science comes from the gut and that evidence-based science is all a big male con. She's also a TERF. FFS she uses Spider-Man as an example of hidden male evilness. My science gut says she's not worth listening to for a moment. Giving her our attention is the best thing that's ever happened to her, because she will use anything said about her to prove to herself and others that she's a victim. Ignore her and move along, citizens.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:29 AM
3

you don't get this way about your dentist spending five minutes digging around in your mouth?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:27 AM
5

Why are some people so worried about their buttholes? is only smellz
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:15 AM
3

How can you generate all the power if you're just laying there?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:58 AM
10

It's really not a big deal. It takes all of four seconds.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:58 AM
1

I philia, man.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:10 AM
1

phillyphile
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:21 AM
12

Samantha Bee left Comedy Central. Full Frontal is on TBS.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 05:38 PM
2

Change "crap" to "junk" and put that crabby old lady on the side, they'd sell it.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:09 AM
57

I wouldn't. This is the kind of tepid humor you'd find on the side of a coffee mug at the Hallmark Store. I'm not offended by the sentiment, just the shitty delivery.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:45 PM
11

Seriously. Here's the archive.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:12 PM
8

"Not going to jump to conclusions..." Good, good, justice should always be cautious. It's important not to be biased any one direction until we have all the facts. "investigate the husband... very thoroughly." Goddammit.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:50 AM
6

And very few people in racial minority communities gets crucified for being homophobic. The person you're responding to didn't say that homophobic people in racial minority communities get crucified. They said that if you call someone in a racial minority community out on their homophobia, then you will be crucified. I'm pretty sure, anyways.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:05 PM
2

Breve, here here, on core.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 11:10 PM
154

You mean the same argument that outrages them when it's used in abortion debates? I want to see the movie but if it's just going to piss me off with stuff like this, I might not have the patience for it.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:56 PM
32

No kidding. It's "36 Summer Olympic bulges that deserve gold" followed by forty gold trophies. Absolute garbage.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 03:32 PM
23

In fairness, this isn't a bad point. There are a lot of good, genuine, and open people out there, and they're not so difficult to find. It's easy to stick to one's little circle of the internet (regardless of your social or political leanings) and convince yourself that all X are like Y. That such prudish guy-fearing behavior exists is ridiculous considering the blatant hypocrisy, but you're right - we shouldn't get so carried away sitting behind our keyboards that we fall into the trap of think…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 03:29 PM
69

Condescension happens in both directions. I'm sure it is or was an actual issue as women began working in various industries where the more experienced group was typically also older and male, but for the most part it's just a subcategory of speaking condescendingly to someone. Which is rude but not unidirectional. Men do it to women and other men, women do it to men and other women, and some people get defensive when anything is explained to them, even if they truly don't understand the subject…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:33 PM
8

Everyone should garden if they can. It's not hard to do a little, and it's always nice to have some aloe vera or fresh basil on hand.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:11 PM
27

"45% of women will be unfaithful at some point in their marriages" Don't get left out!
/r/MensRights23/04/17 11:34 PM
32

I was expecting some kind of human interest story about women with husbands who are missing in action or in a coma or something, or maybe about people exploring open relationships. Nope. All three of them were unhappy and decided to ditch their relationships rather than figure out why the marriage wasn't working or just ending things. Cowards.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 11:33 PM
5

More importantly, you would have to discuss all of your business plans that might be profitable in the future. The stock market is a risk and it could just have easily gone the other way. If that's the case, I'm guessing she would have laughed in his face if the company's value had instead plummeted and he had come after a share of the cash she'd received. They either share in the future value, gains and losses, or they don't.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 11:07 PM
3

It's been a long time since I've seen such a Deep Thought.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:12 PM
3

Liv47 is saying that both of the subreddits in question are against the particular movements but not against the rights themselves. (I don't know that that's true, but that's the idea.) For example, I don't consider myself a feminist, but I think they should be treated equally to men. I don't want to take any of their rights away, and in some cases they are clearly being held back in favor of men. Similarly, there are feminists who want fathers to get fair custody, who care about the male suicid…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:54 AM
2

I mean, it's not as good as Louie, but Pamela Adlon is pretty boss and Louis CK still had a hand in creating the series. It's a little preachy sometimes but I can deal with it.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:44 PM
34

You do not possess a haram yet Absolutely haram. I think you're looking for "harem".
/r/MensRights17/12/16 12:13 AM
7

People on Facebook are idiots, this is news? You could find just as much ignorance in any demographic, this anecdote just illustrates what we already knew: some people are idiots who don't even realize the implications of what they're saying.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 05:45 AM
2

An inanimate object could cause a lot more physical damage, whereas a penis (since it's part of another human) could conceivably cause more emotional trauma. I suppose both are capable of transmitting disease, although I know which of the two potential vectors of transmission worries me more. So in short: I don't know, and I hope I never find out.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 12:09 AM
5

I never have to worry where I poop. Even the sink?
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:53 PM
14

Good enough for me.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:24 AM
5

I'm the same way. I've seen people express disgust for the idea of a female Bond (primarily because they reject the fan theory that the 007/Bond identity is a mantle passed from agent to agent,) but personally I'd watch it. Some interesting stuff could happen with a female Bond, more than just a simple genderswap. But if the movie was a grrl-power propaganda piece about a secret agent using her feminist superpowers to foil the evil plans of the big bad patriarchy, I'd pass. Just keep ideology ou…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 06:11 PM
16

What a weird coincidence.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:23 PM
39

I got a ten-year pin. It was given to me (and some 20-odd other employees) in one of those cheap plastic boxes with the see-through tops that fall apart on the drive home. The pin itself was so cheap that it broke when I tried to apply it to my badge. No doubt it was a fifty-cent piece of shit from some office supply catalog. Companies generally don't give a fuck about being loyal to their employees. There's no financial upside. The other way around, though? They do want to foster the idea that …
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:30 PM
3

Do you think feminists would sit quietly, twiddling their thumbs, if only women were required to fill out a variety of forms just to get access to federal employment or aid, and meanwhile men just got access to those things automatically? The draft itself doesn't matter much (mostly for the reason you gave) but the gender-specific penalties associated with failing to register with selective service are complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:21 PM
10

That's fine. I've always been anti-draft. But if the selective service registration should continue to exist, it should be equal. If for no other reason than that some people might reconsider the draft's existence once it can affect both their sons and their daughters.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:18 PM
10

If the problem is at all difficult, BLOW UP THE RELATIONSHIP. How could I forget?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:39 PM
44

I used to lurk there a few years ago. Eventually I realized that practically every post's responses boiled down to: dump that guy, you can do way better you're being selfish, consider what she wants and start doing that from now on he's crazy, get out, post on Facebook, tell your friends, call the cops And very rarely, she's crazy, have you talked to her about this? Much of the time, voices of reason or those advocating non-drastic measures were frequently at the bottom of the page. Assumptions …
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:16 PM
73

What possible place could such speculative horseshit have on Wikipedia? The situation probably persisted... This discovery must have led to a sense of upset... Breeding in particular is likely to have led women... And don't forget the weasel words: Some scholars believe the well-known Venus figurines... Still today, this social model... tends globally to prevail. Some may even go as far as to argue... Clumsy and sometimes inappropriately-floral prose aside, this is Wikipedia Deletion Fodder 101.…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:46 AM
3

I have no idea what she even means by "socially constructed." My guess is it's just a thought-terminating cliche.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:34 PM
3

For all you know, the guy's 15/16ths Hispanic, and the last several generations of Zimmerman men just keep having boys who like full-blooded Hispanic women (whatever that means.)
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:45 PM
1

There's that huge shitlord database somewhere, isn't there? Posting to certain subreddits gets you added automatically, whereas posing certain arguments can also get you added to the list. I don't know if it's still active or not.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:18 PM
70

The Council of Eldhers will decide which of them has internalized the most misogyny, and she will be sent for re-education.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:16 PM
2

Clickbait title. The mystery tactic is what they call "opposition research." Basically doxxing. How it's "newly trendy" is beyond me. DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim & Offender) is only loosely related to the article, as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 12:21 AM
33

"Your entire subreddit has been banned because of, um... doxxing? brigading? encouraging violence? maybe hate speech..." Meanwhile SRS does all of the above with no repercussions whatsoever.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 12:59 PM
42

This flies in the face of the typical feminist response to gender bias regarding child custody. (They'll do the usual routine where, if something is bad for men, it's actually because of misogyny.) When it comes to child custody, they'll say the court's bias against men is actually misogyny, because custody is primarily awarded to women based on the sexist notion that women are or should be the primary caregivers. So why aren't feminists taking this opportunity to dispel the sexist notion that w…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 04:44 PM
3

I just don't care about some barely-offensive remark about gender roles on social media. Even if society started caring about men's rights overnight, you'd still have idiots like this, just like there are still people who are against miscegenation or who believe we never landed on the moon. I just can't care about something so small.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:19 PM
10

I'll take "Things they would never say to a woman who presented video evidence of her abuse" for $500, Alex.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 01:59 AM
6

There isn't really any evidence to support a large number of Jews fleeing Egypt like that, unless you mean the Jews that were expelled by the Egyptian government in the 1950s. The exodus as described in the Bible is wholly unsupported by archaeological findings or historical record. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Egypt#Ancient_times
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:17 PM
1

The Boondocks - Return of the King
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:04 AM
7

Well, there's the bro code. But that's not really instilled at a young age, so it isn't quite analogous.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:13 AM
29

It's not about being PC, it's about being respectful to Native Americans. And if nothing else, it removes ambiguity.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 05:18 PM
6

Sounds like a good time. I'll bring pizza.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:41 AM
20

If she actually made eleven false rape accusations against innocent men, you have to wonder how often she used the threat of a false rape accusation to get what she wanted from innocent men. I'm guessing she has made the threat a lot more than eleven times, and her victims were forced to comply because they knew their lives could easily be ruined.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:28 PM
16

But wait, if a woman isn't a feminist then feminists will say she has internalized misogyny. Does that mean that everyone is the patriarchy? And if everyone can be part of the problem, does that mean that there's really no fair place to put the blame? No, no, that can't be right. It's probably just the men's fault.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:43 PM
2

And after he stole the leap day idea from Julia! #patriarchy
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:17 AM
17

Gregorian calendar is misogyny.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:48 PM
16

Or do you not know how bail works? Do you?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:23 AM
1

Not only is this a textbook example of a perfect solution fallacy, but it does the same bullshit politicians have been using to divide us for generations: Voters are concerned about a topic you don't want to address? Distract them with social issues. This is such a blatant line of horseshit. It's a wonder to me how anybody in the 99.9% thinks they can trust her to stay true to her word on anything.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:29 PM
14

Confirmed: Binomial distribution is mansplaining.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:27 PM
0

Sorry, I took too long to get my response just right and it ended up being marked as edited. I don't like having comments marked as edited in this subreddit, for reasons that may no longer be relevant. So I deleted the old one and re-submitted.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:41 AM
14

I'm not entirely comfortable referring to drafted service as slavery, but I see where you're coming from. But even when the draft doesn't happen, it's still bullshit because it's one extra step that men have to take to keep some of their rights and avoid possible punishment. Women don't have to do it. If there were a form that women had to fill out (even if that form were obligation-free, which the selective service application is not) in order to get all of the rights that men got by default, f…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:39 AM
42

They'll act horrified and say no, of course. That's the part where you assure them that there hasn't been any forced impregnation for a long time, and the government is not likely to invoke the birth draft ever again, so what's the harm? Because when I hear people defending a male-only draft with that line, it pisses me off to no end.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 02:16 AM
5

Well, that's one way to appeal to younger female voters, a demographic with which Hillary has come up embarrassingly short. If this tactic doesn't work, I'll have a lot more faith in the younger generation.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:00 PM
6

Any woman attempting to educate and control men is a valiant hero, but no woman is required to do so. Well yeah, because expecting somebody to do something just because of their gender is wr- Wait a minute... To these individuals, strong European women are ‘easy’ and easy victims; they have respect only for strong men – and strong men aren't exactly thick on the ground in Europe. The deficiency of masculinity in European culture renders it impotent in the face of the political and cultural chaos…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:53 PM
26

Wage gaps exist, in certain demographics, for various reasons. Hell, there are even wage gaps that favor women. And with the education gap currently favoring women by a significant margin, female-favoring wage gaps could very possibly see some serious growth in the not-too-distant future.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:41 AM
3

SAGE SAGE SAGE
/r/MensRights29/01/16 04:43 PM
16

Worst case scenario for them, the comment is widely condemned and the person who made it is deemed "not a real feminist."
/r/MensRights29/01/16 04:59 AM
2

And then you have secret courts, and people being disappeared off the streets.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 11:35 PM
2

Good thing it was raining when you saw this post or you would've looked like an idiot standing outside that way.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:14 PM
77

A self-defense instructor demonstrates how to handle an attacker with a knife
/r/MensRights16/01/16 05:55 PM
5

I may be cracking open a huge can of worms by trying to describe this in relatively simple terms, but here we go... Gamergate purports to be about ethics in journalism. For many of its supporters, this is true. Anti-Gamergate purports to be about protecting women in gaming and gaming journalism from the hate machine of the internet. For many of its supporters, this is true. GG mostly thinks the Anti-GG crowd is a bunch of SJWs who want to gain traction in the industry by social means rather than…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 10:05 PM
37

mental health professionals I'm now parsing this as health professionals who are fucking mental.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 03:00 PM
4

This is the kind of mansplaining bullshit at the root of the problem! I can't believe you would verbally attack me like this. Please donate $5 or more to my Kickstarter campaign so that I can create videos about why free speech is so problematic for the internet and how video games physically harm women.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:58 AM
2

So, Batman?
/r/MensRights10/01/16 01:58 AM
10

Well one has laser eyes and super speed but the other one has x-ray vision and can leap tall buildings in a single bound. I guess it all depends on whether it's a surprise attack, and how much preparation is allowed.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 11:45 PM
19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment#Feminists_split
/r/MensRights28/12/15 08:49 PM
6

http://i.imgur.com/YRvG0sL.gifv
/r/MensRights27/12/15 07:56 PM
3

By that logic we should be able to get away with the mom character in a sitcom being a complete buffoon while the dad always comes through in the end with a poignant-yet-comedically-delivered solution to all the problems she's caused. There have been thousands of others who are the exact opposite!
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:49 PM
5

See also: the DEA's crusade against weed.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:21 AM
1

I'd never considered that. I still think that the criminal justice system itself is a larger problem when it comes to decreasing the size of the male voter base, but I definitely underestimated the effect that the fear of a draft could have on male voter registration. Good point.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 08:27 PM
1

Since the failure to register with selective service is rarely prosecuted, it can not reduce the male voter base in any noticeable way unless a draft is instated. Until the draft is instated, I'd say that the criminal justice system's bias against men and for women is a much more significant source of attrition against the male voter base.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 08:11 AM
5

The draft might not be the most damaging issue facing men today, but it certainly is up there in terms of the most obvious inequality. In the United States, a woman has more rights than a man. They have every right we have, and then some. To get those extra rights, we have to register for the draft. If we do not, we definitely lose access to those rights and possibly face consequences. From the U.S. Selective Service website: A young man who fails to register with Selective Service may be inelig…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 12:43 AM
46

The closing remark – ‘gender equality is for everyone’ – echoes misogynistic rhetoric that men’s issues have been drowned out by the focus on women’s rights. The doublethink here is maddening.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:25 PM
24

If Daily Mail does something despicable, don't give them clicks. Here's an archived version of the link provided above.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 04:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter