TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

haveacigar4200 Archive

View 0 posts and 273 comments by haveacigar4200 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, you're just a stupid asshole. Generalizing a group like you did is just wrong.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:16 PM
9

Thanks for joining the fight to prevent this movement from devolving into something identical to feminism.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:15 PM
6

Thank you! I've been doin this and I get downvotes to hell.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:14 PM
10

Woah woah! Don't try to provide a nuanced view of both sides now! Not on this sub.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 12:20 AM
1

Did I ever say it was an attempt? Men and women both threaten suicide and attempt suicide for attention. Men just are more successful with their attempts because they use better methods. (Guns)
/r/MensRights24/11/17 03:50 PM
1

My thoughts exactly of yourself.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:28 PM
2

It is equally attention-seeking when you threaten it every opportunity you get. Are men incapable of using suicide threats as a control mechanism?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:11 PM
-1

It's easier if you use a gun. Men usually use guns. This is an effective way to do it. Women prefer to take pills. My aunt killed herself. It wasn't for attention. She botched it though. She was hospitalized, brain dead. Eventually the family had to decide to pull the plug. I find it irritating when people say "women do it for attention." That's not always the case. Men also sometimes do it for attention too. These mass shooters that intend to bring others with them don't desire attention? Pussi…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 03:46 AM
1

Fuck You! BC is used to alleive cramps and slow bleeding. It also causes less periods. I know women that need this MEDICATION otherwise they miss work, school. Picking and choosing what meds are covered is horseshit. When was the last time a group of female politicians decided that you must pay for a medication that without, will cause you to bleed excessively and feel extreme pain?
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:53 AM
1

If you are paying for insurance, that is free? The point of insurance is health care. BC is health care.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:49 AM
1

It is used for cramping and bleeding as well. When have a group of female politicians decided that you must have to pay for your meds out of pocket? Meds that without, cause you to bleed excessively and cramp so bad you Can't walk? Well, you're a damn bigot for pointing out that particular inconsistency. You're a damn fool for thinking BC is strictly for preventing birth.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:48 AM
-1

VIAGRA IS NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY. Fuck. Birth control is. Some women NEED birth control for normal functioning. You can't work when your tampon won't hold the blood in. You can work with limp dick. These congressmen also allow the DoD to prescribe Viagra. We spend 55 million a year on it. My point was that we don't have congressman trying to limit access to viagra(unnecessary) but they DO try to limit access to BD (necessary)
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:41 AM
0

Haha schooled on substance? Where?
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:37 AM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2867898/Lena-Dunham-breaks-silence-say-gave-rapist-pseudonym-protect-apologizes-man-falsely-identified-attacker.html Found it
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:49 PM
1

I will do some digging. All I can find right now is the latest Lena Dunham scandal. This one is about a year or so old. I will do some digging. All I can find right now is the latest Lena Dunham scandal. This one is about a year or so old. That article is buried
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:48 PM
1

There is a perfect example of the fact-free bullshit! Breitbart totally started a witch hunt. It certainly wasn't feminists running a witch hunt, nope not at all. They literally were the ones that named the accuser by full name. Fuck off with your fact free idiocy.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:19 PM
0

And you can't do either so you aren't worth arguing.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:53 PM
1

Surely! A couple weeks ago in the comments section someone started criticizing Lena Dunham, (very common here, I know lol) I hate Dunham for many reasons. She is a vile person. But what was being said was vastly untrue. An article was posted, which I read. The article was about her sloppy use of a pseudonym in regards to a sexual assault story she wrote that resulted in Breitbart starting a witch hunt to identify the perpetrator. Eventually they pinned their investigation on a guy that fit Dunha…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:47 PM
-8

Do you logic? lol Logic is a verb now, eh?
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:34 PM
-5

Anyone can get it if they can afford it. That's how everything works. And fuck the ones that can't! Capitalism! Insurers cannot deny you anything. If you provide "health insurance" you shouldn't pick and choose what people need. This sentence is so poorly written that it defies accurate interpretation. Again, insurers are not required to cover Viagra, and most do not. As this is the current situation, it would not make sense for anyone to go out of their way to achieve this. The same congressmen…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:33 PM
-1

Criticize the BS all you want, just don't expect people to ignore yours. Well one can't be ignorant if he does not ignore things! Is this the part where you cherry pick downvoted posts, misrepresent every argument we make, and complain about our hostility towards feminists? No, this is the part where I criticize the circle-jerking, the double standards and fact-free criticisms y'all make.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:30 PM
-7

When did I say anything about free shit?
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:17 PM
0

No, just basic facts. They tend to be dismissed to make way for feelings.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:16 PM
1

Shall I write you a book?
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:16 PM
-20

It limits access. Viagra is not medically necessary. Not having it will not cause you to bleed all over the place. Not having it will not cause you intense pain. Not having it will not cause you to miss work. Birth control is an important medication. Congressman, mostly male congressman, have allowed insurers to deny the med based on religious grounds. These same congressman have not went out of their way to get Viagra from being covered. HYPOCRISY!
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:15 PM
1

When men and women work side by side and earn the same they still offload the risky work to men for free. just look around at who stocks the shelves in stores and who presses buttons and collects money. Now check out wages of stock boys and wages of cashiers. You will find that women actually make more for a safer and easier job. That is pure opinion. In my experience, I would try to due the heavy lifting and dangerous shit in exchange for the ladies doing disgusting things I didn't want to. At …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:01 PM
-5

And it is slowly turning the movement into a symmetrical version of feminism. Facts are not important. They are ignored. The points made on this sub are all emotion, free of fact.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:46 PM
-29

Birth control. The state has allowed insurers to not include it. If a bunch of female politicians did this with Viagra the MRAs would flip shit.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:43 PM
0

I'm not the one doing the whataboutism, the double standards, and the circle jerking. I'm not part of the problem. I want the movement to do well. If we don't criticize this BS then it will go nowhere.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:42 PM
-3

I agree! The lack of moderation has allowed this to turn into a "we-are-so-much-better-than-feminists" circlejerk. Actual issues are not brought to the communities attention.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:25 PM
-10

Truth.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:12 PM
-25

And misogynists use state overreach to block women from medication.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:12 PM
-13

Well most of the men on here are right wing dipshits, so it is not a surprise.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:11 PM
2

You are not applying your metrics universally. What does that have to do with the fact that men die 17 times as often on the job? You are citing a national statistic that disregards type of work done. It just measures all men and all women and spits out that number: 17 times more dangerous for men than women. Feminists cite a national statistic that disregards type of work when they claim that there is a paygap. It just measures all men and all women and spits out that number: women make 77 cent…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:10 PM
1

I'm not going to tell you about your life. I know nothing about it. What I do know is: The double standard is that many MRAs criticize feminists for complaining about a pay-gap. If we criticize them for choosing lower paying jobs on average then we should shut up about men having more dangerous jobs. Or we could complain about dangerous jobs and shit up about the pay-gap "hypocrisy."
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:03 AM
-11

Men are forced at gunpoint to take dangerous jobs? So are women forced to take lower paying jobs? You are emulating feminists. You are making it seem like men have no choice in what jobs they do. Then you use the danger they put themselves in as a talking point. Is the paygap talking point feminists make at all valid? Do feminists have no choice in the jobs they take? Whose fault is it that they tend to take lower paying jobs? Whose fault is it that men tend to take more dangerous jobs?
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:57 AM
1

It is funny that you keep screeching "LIAR" but you can't point to one lie that I said. Society and people like you have a beef with MRA and call it a hate movement because we called out feminism and its lies. When did I call it a hate movement? I never did. Weird. Sounds like you lied. LIAR. Let us talk divirce. Assets are divided disproportionately with the men being left homeless and broke. Who do you blame this on? Judges decide divorces on a case by case basis. Judges are also mostly men or…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:30 AM
1

What did you say to me you lying sack of period blood? What lies have I stated? Wow, you really do mental gymnastics in order to feel oppressed. Pay gap, manspreading, mansplaining, visual rapes...and so goes the lies feminism breeds and shit like you spread. Show me where I said anything like that. As long as there are SJW men like you there will never be true equality? I'm not the SJW here. SJWs hate stereotyping and generalizations. But.......generalizations tend to be true: Men tend to be mo…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 01:14 AM
1

The reason WHY is because they were only recently allowed to enter the workforce. Women only joined the workforce en masse during World War II. Most universities did not admit women until this era either. You seem to desperately want to blame it on something else.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 12:53 AM
0

hahaha forced fight for your rights? Are you 14? It would make a lot more sense if you are a high school student. Come back at me with that stupid shit when prescriptions like Viagra can be excluded from insurance plans and thousands of men die of back alley vasectomies every year. When a MRA rally is tear gassed and fire hoses then come at me with that "forced to fight for rights" idiocy. You are quite the ignorant pussy.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 12:51 AM
0

lol people like you need to be called out. You hold back the progression of men's rights with your stupidity. Keep up your fact-free diatribe if you intend to make your causes go nowhere. You make MRAs look like crybaby retards. Just stop.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:32 PM
0

Stop projecting your own SJW crybaby status on me. Your circle jerking of MRAs is pretty faggy.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:38 PM
1

Being rich is irrelevant. Did I state that she is rich or well connected? They are not at all the same. Because people never work with the same producers in future projects and want to keep those ties to make future projects easier to get off the ground. Do you understand what 'name recognition' means? Someone like Lena Dunham can take a shit and call it a show, and it will get picked up off the ground. If you need proof, watch all 5 seasons of girls.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:47 AM
1

Lmao, her show is over and she has been well connected since birth. Her livelihood is fine. I never said she was better. Based on her statements (that you seem to not have read) she has seemed to have learned. Learning doesn't make you magically better. I'm not trying to defend her, I think she's dispicable for many reasons. If you are going to criticize a despicable person it shouldn't be hard to make accurate criticisms.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:07 PM
1

Well people, even terrible people, are capable of growth. Treating people like they are irredeemable is how we become like the feminists that we hate.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 03:53 PM
0

Really? I'm not obsessed with trying to figure out how I'm a victim. That's your game, bitchass MRA pussy.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 01:21 AM
1

Yes, when three men surround a woman that is walking home alone that is totally not the man's fault that she is uncomfortable. You should try having close female friends. You'd be surprised how aggressive men can be when there is nobody around to witness it. It is a daily thing. I have friends that primarily walk. There's a creepy guy almost everyday. When three guys were standing behind a gas station, catcalling my friend while standing in a dark alley, were they really trying to be friendly? W…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 03:36 PM
1

So we hate her for saying women don't lie about rape And now we hate her for recanting that idea? It seems she has educated herself about misreporting based on her statement. We should chastise her for forming a more realistic outlook based on her learned experiences? That's hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 03:29 PM
0

I'm a man. You're a little bitch though. You lack the traits that make men manly. "Oooooh, wahhhh, poor men. Men are always victims." That is you. You sound like a womanly pussy.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:01 PM
1

Holy shit, you don't know things. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/07/21/538518569/cdc-half-of-all-female-murder-victims-are-killed-by-intimate-partners Half of female murder victims are murdered by their intimate partners. Pretending that women are a bigger threat to men is insane. Seriously I am way more likely to be, quite liter\lly, randomly punched in the face at any given moment in any public space than any woman is of having anything at all done to her. No, you just desperatel…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 09:58 PM
2

Stop the whataboutism to start off. When someone criticizes MRA behavior or thought, don't immediately try to make it seem acceptable to behave that way just because the feminists have done A, B, and C. People on here could also stop repeating things that are obviously false. For example: There was an article about a woman that basically got away with murder. It seemed clear that she likely killed her husband purposefully. The prosecution had no case though. The only evidence they had was her st…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:44 PM
0

I'm not new here. I've been here for months. I'm also a man. I've been catcalled once. She was not aggressive. She did not follow me. She did not cuss at me. Men aggressively catcall. I didn't make this up. Have you ever felt unsafe due to rejecting someone? Women get this shit daily. I've seen it happen too many times.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:27 PM
-2

How many times have you been rudely catcalled?
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:30 AM
2

Or we could acknowledge each side objectively............ JK!
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:29 AM
-20

That was her point. In America or Romania it is common for men to acknowledge that they are attracted to you. It is very animalistic. In my city last month a man was Cat calling a woman on the street. She ignored him. Guess what he did. He pulled a gun out and started shooting at her. https://www.google.com/amp/fox4kc.com/2017/10/24/woman-walking-in-waldo-neighborhood-shot-at-after-rejecting-man-who-wanted-phone-number/amp/ Or this one where three guys attacked someone that denied them: http://f…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:45 PM
1

Well I would argue that stupidity, but why? I'm going to take Twain's advice here: “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.” Everything you say is invalid. You "beat me!"
/r/MensRights16/11/17 03:37 AM
0

And you likely don't care about the underlying issue that a feminist has, you just see the points made as invalid talking points.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:05 AM
0

Oh yes, some PAC cares about a woman that needs birth control. /s
/r/MensRights15/11/17 11:32 PM
0

Can you name a prominent MRA who has advocated femicide? There are not prominent feminists that advocate genocide. Just because you have heard of them from right wing outlets does not make them prominent or influential among actual feminists civilians. The only people that give these people a platform are right-wingers that want the general public to see feminism as insane. Elizabeth Cady Stanton created the first feminist conference in American history. She wrote in her diary that "we are, as a…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 11:31 PM
1

No, I just hadn't had time to respond to this idiocy. I might as well go argue a dumbass feminazi.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 10:45 PM
-3

Name some. I'll wait. This sub has plenty. If you have not noticed an influx of He-Man Woman-Hater's Club members in the last 6 months you are either turning a blind eye or you are not frequenting the comments. Whereas feminists frequently express a desire to see men placed in concentration camps or killed No they don't frequently express that. You want this to be true, desperately, but that is total bullshit. I know plenty of feminists and I have never heard that sentiment. You can't cite one c…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:33 PM
1

Yes, men that think women deserve equal access to perscriptions medicine in their insurance plans are cancerous. Why would we want equality?!?! /s If a woman supports certain men's rights issues, is that cancerous?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:21 PM
-11

Yeah, there are literally zero misogynists that absolutely hate women within the MR movement. /s And the modern feminist that advocates keeping politicians out of her medical decisions is definitely full of hatred. Her need for birth control is unimportant and her actions to assure equal access to medicine is exactly what hate groups do. /s
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:17 PM
0

And men that behave like feminists are not cancerous to the MR movement?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:19 PM
1

we use logic I'm sure the feminazis think the same of themselves. and actually want equality Many on here do not. There is a huge problem on this sub of men that want to be able to control a woman's reproductive rights. There are men on here that see women doing better in the workplace as a threat to men. They don't want equality. They want to return to the days where men definitely had it better. They only see men as victims and women as oppressors. We aren't denying the stats; but women take t…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:18 PM
0

Fox News: let's bring the most ridiculous feminist we can find and bring her on Fucker Tarlson's shitty show so that everybody thinks that all feminist are like this. r/MensRights: Yeah, look at how ridiculous those feminists are! We are so much better!
/r/MensRights12/11/17 12:29 AM
2

No, if the prosecution had just a sliver of evidence she would never get out. Circumstantial evidence does not meet the criteria for a conviction.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:55 PM
1

Finally he told me it happened in Georgia. The law in Georgia makes his story impossible. In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully So his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:49 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:22 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:22 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:22 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:22 PM
1

Showing no remorse does not mean you are guilty. That is not evidence.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:21 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:21 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:21 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:21 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:21 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:21 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:20 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:20 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:20 PM
2

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:20 PM
2

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:20 PM
1

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:19 PM
2

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:19 PM
2

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:19 PM
2

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:19 PM
0

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully No, his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:19 PM
0

In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully Your friend knew she was 15. The law requires that they willfully and intentionally engaged a minor sexually. Either he is lying to you, or you are lying to us.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:11 PM
1

What state are you in? I'm curious about the laws there.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 05:08 PM
1

No, he is making shit up or leaving out details. I scoured Google for a while and I could not find anything remotely close to this case. He has respected his friends dignity as he has maintained his innocence. His friends privacy is already gone though. Once you are convicted of a crime, it is public knowledge. He is just bullshitting everyone and nobody is calling him out because he is a male. People on this sub are so quick to call rape accusers liars, but when a obviously fabricated story is …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 05:07 PM
1

Then condemn these misogynistic assholes every opportunity that you get. They hurt your reputation as a MRA. They hurt the MR movement. If you want to be better than the feminists you MUST keep a lid on the extremists of your movement. You do not want this sub to have the reputation as the he-man woman-haters club.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:20 PM
1

And this whole men's rights thing is by and large men grasping onto power they know they have lost. Most on here don't give a shit about equality either. They have became symmetrical to the third wave feminists that they hate. Mosty, I agree that there are issues that man face that women don't. You used a perfect example of male circumcision. You are right. Women do not care about this issue and actually make it worse. No problem I have with this sub, and so many MRAs, is that they don't care fo…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:18 PM
1

For starters, which lie did I state specifically? Secondly, if you read more than the headline you would find out the truth of the matter was that she did not get a pussy pass. The prosecution tried to charge her with murder but they had no case. All they had was circumstantial evidence. You can't try someone for murder just because they're happy that the victim is dead. You're an idiot if you think otherwise. The prosecution tried. You lie if you say otherwise. I find it in funny that people on…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:05 PM
0

Men and women have equal legal rights? Viagra is required for insurance plans. Is birth control? And are you implying that women have full access to healthcare? 44 Abortion is under attack. It is a medical procedure, like it or not. Are you barred from getting certain procedures via state legislation? Claiming that men are on the bottom of the totem pole is fucking ridiculous. They made the totem pole.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:50 AM
1

so have you never considered that most men don't feel victimized? Why do you think so many feminists exist? Are they all making shit up? Or have so many been so dramatically victimized that they decided to stop being complacent and start being advocates? Why do men lack so many advocates? Does it have nothing to do with the lack of victimization?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:03 AM
0

Well this guy is full of shit. Talking to him makes it obvious.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:58 AM
0

He's a liar.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:47 AM
3

He's a liar.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:47 AM
-1

Well calling the feminists "they" seems a bit dehumanizing, no? And besides that, how do feminists have more power than men? Did feminists create he institutions we are built on? If they were only allowed into certain institutions recently, how can they control them? Remember, not until 1945 were women allowed into Harvard. If they control things, why is his true?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:46 AM
-11

Because you are full of shit. His info is already splashed all over the place. Anybody that he knows already knows his situation. You are full of shit and you know it. Edit: In general, under Georgia’s Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, a person commits the offense of computer or electronic pornography if such person intentionally or willfully So his friend knew she was 15. Georgia law makes it clear that they must willingly and intentionally engage a minor sexually in order to be charged.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:54 AM
-1

This thread is full of liars with an agenda.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:53 AM
0

True. Shit does happen. But to my main point, either the guy that posted this comment has not given enough details, he is lying, or his friend is lying. Unknowingly texting someone underage is not illegal. Pornographic images are though
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:53 AM
-9

Yes, most lobbying groups are ran by women. Not men. /s They dont need our help and in fact actively oppose any work to further men's rights in areas such as paternity and domestic violence. Who is this mysterious 'they?"
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:42 AM
-12

Nobody here is trying to say women in general got it easy False. There are many men that have shared this perspective with me. It is a HUGE problem here. I can pull an example from the past week if you'd like. this post is just an example of how messed up our judicial system is and how men often get punished more severely for the same crime. I know the purpose of this propaganda. It misconstrues the fact that the prosecution tried to charge her with murder but had their hands tied due to lack of…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:42 AM
2

Yeah, unless you have physically met it is a bad idea. Even then, revenge porn , cloud hacks, etc are plenty of reason to avoid it.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:29 AM
9

I doubt it. It is way more likely that his friend is not being totally forthcoming. If you receive child porn, you're fucked. Unless.... you report it immediately. He likely did not and was likely charged with possession of child porn which would make sense why he was sentenced so long.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:25 AM
-4

Have an article for proof?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:16 AM
-21

But y'all only bitch about men's issues and minimize female issue
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:15 AM
1

Have an article for proof? Sounds like a load of shit.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:15 AM
-2

It is exaggerated. He is full of shit.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:14 AM
11

Because he is full of shit. That does not happen. If it did, there would be an article somewhere about it.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:14 AM
1

Or his friend is full of shit.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:14 AM
2

Well, they have to be lenient when they only have circumstantial evidence to go on. They had no case for a murder conviction.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:13 AM
-10

Women get in trouble for three strikes too, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:11 AM
2

No, they are especially lenient when they only have circumstantial evidence. Being glad someone is dead does NOT mean you also murdered them. Was George Zimmerman not happy that Trayvon Martin was dead? He talked about it a lot.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:10 AM
1

Your friend is probably full of shit or has a shit lawyer.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:09 AM
5

and zero women https://medium.com/@anoop_alc/almost-everything-that-is-wrong-with-prisons-and-deportation-in-one-woman-s-story-7731cd4b0ee8
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:08 AM
1

Lmao, you sound like a feminist so badly. I am sure you are ignorant to how alike you are.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 12:40 AM
1

Yes, your complaint about that child-producing pressure pressure being sexist against women was bogus and is experienced by men and women in equivalent measures. I'm glad you realize that now Has anyone ever hassled you for choosing to have a career instead of a family? Has anyone ever hassled you for being "a bad dad" because you have a full time job? When that shit happens then I will believe there is equality on the issue. This is true. Boy fights are more frequent, easier to break up, and do…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 12:11 AM
1

Men have exactly the same pressure that women have when it comes to children. I mean, it's not "popping a baby out of their bodies" (biology doesn't work that way), but if you hit 30 and you're not married, everyone starts asking you, repeatedly, when you're going to get married and have a family, and keep insisting that you should. MEN AND WOMEN BOTH. Congratulations, equality! Look, the study in question studied it. Girls and boys with equivalent behavior boys are punished harder. One study? H…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 04:04 AM
1

And the mods here sit on their hands as these folk turn into an alternate versions of feminazis coming together for the He-Man Woman-Haters Club. It is disappointing as there are plenty of real-world issues that men deal with that need to be addressed.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:47 PM
1

Now your argument pretends that women have not expected to start pumping out babies ASAP for millennia. That is just insane. As if there is no pressure for them to reproduce. For fuck's sake, men don't even have the same time pressure that women have. I work with kids. I am sorry, but once you yell at a girl they usually stop doing what they were doing. Boys push limits. Boys hate authority. I have never had a boy cry when I yell at them. They tend to not care that an authority figure is mad at …
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:43 PM
3

SHE DID NOT ACCUSE A SPECIFIC PERSON. Read the article. The reason she made a pseudonym was to avoid a trial by media. She had no desire to press charges. She felt that the rape was her fault, that she did not make it 100% clear that she did not want to do it. That was her entire reason for writing the piece so that others that blame themselves have someone to relate to. This had nothing to do with "sending an innocent to prison." Obviously she should have disclosed that is was a pseudonym. Duh.…
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:06 PM
2

So you are making a baseless claim that she made a baseless claim. Do you see the hypocrisy here?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:58 PM
1

You speak as if men are held at gunpoint to take dangerous jobs. Who forced them to suck at school and have no better option?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:56 PM
1

These husbands have a literally told me that their jobs are easy and that they get to be lazy. They do freelance work in film, Photography , editing, and design. Those manly man, stereo typical jobs that you speak of are slowly disappearing. No matter what though, that doesn't make raising kids and keeping a household not work. If it is not work, you suck at what you were doing. The laundry has not been done, the dishes are not kept up, you have not went to the grocery store, you have not cleane…
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:27 PM
1

Some subs make people crazier than others though. Over the last six months I've watched this sub turn into a really ugly, woman hating, fact free echo chamber. Rules of the sub Reddit and the moderation of the subReddit heavily affect what type of speech is permitted on the sub Reddit.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:19 PM
1

I'm not defending her, I'm just calling out these people for saying false things about her. If someone is truly terrible you can easily make a true assertions about their terribleness. Lena Dunham is a stupid, spoiled, brat. I don't want to defend her but if you say that she was faking a rape you are making a baseless claim.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:12 PM
2

She has some shitty pretentious work. She's super well-connected because her parents are wealthy and connected in the business
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:11 PM
2

I don't like her either. Just because I don't like her as a human being doesn't mean that we should all just say incorrect things about her though. I also hated Hillary Clinton but it drove me insane when people were saying she was the head of a pedophile ring or that she murdered 100+ people. If it's not true it's just not fucking true
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:10 PM
1

You can't just spout untruths just because the person is awful. You need to make correct assertions about their awfulness otherwise you are creating a straw man to throw pitchforks at.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:09 PM
3

Exactly my point! Thank you
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:08 PM
2

Thank you! A lot of people on this sub remind me of the feminists that I have always despised.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:07 PM
-1

This sub is becoming fact free and very emotional. These people are turning into the feminists that they hate.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:07 PM
-5

Because she didn't want to ruin the guys life, that means she was lying?. And y'all wonder why victims don't like to speak out.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:41 PM
0

She lied? About the rape or the name?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:40 PM
-1

She lied?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:40 PM
0

She said we was joking?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:39 PM
-1

It didn't happen ? So you'll take her word when she says she molested her sister but you don't believe this ?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:38 PM
-139

I hate to defend of Lena Dunham, but that is untrue. To say she did nothing to clear his name is a lie. You can read the article above and it explains how she made it clear to her fans and the media about the odd coincidence involved with the pseudonym she sloppily used.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:00 AM
-6

Uh huh, yes. Poor, poor, men. Keep playing the victim. You will turn into the feminists that you chide.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 10:46 PM
1

Your saying shit like this makes feminists sound sane. Rasing kids isn't work? It isnt if you suck at it. My friends that are moms work their asses off while their husbands have cushy design jobs that allow them to be lazy. His work is work and hers isn't, how?
/r/MensRights28/10/17 10:38 PM
-10

Yes, and institutionally women have advantages that men don't. Politicians that make up the institutions are usually women. Priorities of women are put before the priorities of men. This is why birth-control is free for everyone with Insurance and Viagra has to be paid for out of pocket. /s
/r/MensRights28/10/17 10:11 PM
-1

Many men don't consider staying home with kids to be work just because there is no pay.. That is also hypocrisy
/r/MensRights28/10/17 09:57 PM
-9

So the common social issues women deal with should be made fun of while common social issues men deal with should be highlighted. Sounds like y'all are becoming much like feminists.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 09:56 PM
1

Is this a sub promoting Men's Rights or is this the He-Man Woman-Haters Club? Is the point of this sub to bitch about women? I must have not got that memo.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 08:03 PM
1

👍🏻
/r/MensRights27/10/17 08:42 PM
0

I didn't and I proved it. You only prove your idiocy.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 07:59 PM
0

Well after a certain point there is no point in arguing with someone that is projecting their own fallacious arguments onto you. And as Twain put it: “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.” So yes, you "beat me" quite handily.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:30 PM
0

Well never mind. There is no saving you. You are very much like the feminists you chide. The more you talk about men's rights, the more you hurt them. Good work on becoming what you are supposed to hate!
/r/MensRights26/10/17 12:48 PM
1

I think feminist don't give a shit about your grapes and want you to shut up whenever they're facing politicians attacking birth control, birth-control rights, etc. I don't agree with Setting people up, but I don't understand why people are taking offense to this slide. This slide could be taken into many contexts and none of us except the OP know what the other slides had.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:18 AM
0

I don't see how people are taking that from this slide. The three main points are men commit a large portion of murders men are more likely to be in legal trouble due to violence men and women likely commit violence at the same frequency If all of the points are true, then the only correct extrapolations one can interpret is that men are more likely to get in trouble for their violence despite men and women committing violence at the same frequency. Though most murders are committed by men, stud…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:15 AM
2

I already did in my previous comment. You summarised my 2nd comment in this comment chain as follows: No you didn't. Isn't that sentence very clearly implying that I denied that "men tend to be more aggressive and quicker to solve disputes with violence?" Am I having a stroke and misunderstanding how the English language works? I doubt it. You were making it seem that the slide was not reflecting reality even though it was. Do you not understand what a lie by omission is? That is usually how bra…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 11:04 PM
1

So read that one, find out that I don't deny that men are more agressive, and then we'll talk. Please point to the part where I accused you of denying this. Then after that, please point to me the part where the PowerPoint said that women are the victims. The powerpoint was about perpetrators and made no mention of victims. For all you know, the next slide showed that most victims are the same race and gender of the perpetrator. You said the powerpoint will make people think that women are the v…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 09:48 PM
4

So it isn't true that men tend to be more aggressive and quicker to solve disputes with violence? Y'all love to go on-and-on about how woman and men don't have a pay gap. The main point made is that men are more aggressive go-getters and choose more demanding, higher paying jobs. So why is it ok to label men as aggressive when it works for your argument but it is feminist propaganda when it proves one of their points. http://fox4kc.com/2017/10/24/woman-walking-in-waldo-neighborhood-shot-at-after…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 09:02 PM
-4

This sub is dedicated to nitpicking. They also like to nitpick feminist nitpicking. The hypocrisy is strong here.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:58 PM
1

When considering the future of a nation, yes, they kind of are. I didn't invent how biological processes work, demographics, or the war machine. It is not my fault that anatomically men are stronger and unable to make babies with just a drop of their partners fluids. It is not my fault that nations with dying populations tend to be weak militarily and economically. Is not my fault that that nations have been using their men to fight wars for thousands of years. If I could make men and women true…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:15 PM
1

Yes, you should not have the same rights as women because you don't have the same motherly responsibilities like carrying a child for 9 months, birthing a child, or breastfeeding. /s
/r/MensRights24/10/17 06:46 PM
0

No, the summary is that men only need to deposit sperm to ensure a future generation and women need to do a lot more to ensure the existence of a future generation.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 06:44 PM
0

I don't know what you mean by brigaded, but when you say things like you did you give feminists ammunition. You are setting men's rights backward.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 06:02 PM
2

Can we leave the nitpicking to the crazy feminists?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:38 AM
6

(Even though they shouldn't be) And you wonder why the feminists are so fucking crazy.... Men's rights isn't more important than human rights.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:36 AM
-4

That is stupid on so many levels. Biologically, we are inequal. If something like World War III breaks out the women have to stay here to raise babies so that the war isn't completely pointless. Is there a war worth fighting if you are going to decimate the demographics of the next generation? I'm generally antiwar I think that war should be avoided at all costs, but drafting men makes sense because they don't have to carry babies for nine months and naturally over our thousands of years of hist…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:35 AM
1

You can't advocate every cause simultaneously. This is like the right wing criticizing BLM or NFL players for protesting police violence by saying things like "Why are they so mad about police when black people are shooting each other in Chicago?" Obviously, these groups don't approve of inner city violence. Just because YOU have not heard them condemn it personally does not mean that they haven't and that doesn't mean that their protest of police violence is not valid just because YOU have sele…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:13 PM
1

Yes, if at birth I was given the choice I would be a lesbian, black, woman. Wouldn't you?!?!?!
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:10 PM
1

SJWs have so much to bitch about, criticizing them for lack of bitching on an issue you care about is just partisan and stupid.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:09 PM
-21

That's absurd. Why are you bringing race into this? I thought the SJW's are the ones that do identity politics. Why are you doing it?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:47 AM
1

I found peace within myself and won the battle against it quite long ago, as a teen actually. hahahahahahahahaaha jesus christ you are a funny one. Such cringy awesomeness.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:14 PM
0

Of course that doesn't concern you! You are a narcissist, and narcissists can't imagine the idea that people can't stand being around them. Do you really think Donald Trump thinks he will die alone? Of course not! He is so awesome and right about everything and all knowing, like yourself, that he couldn't imagine that anybody could ignore his brilliance. You are an expert on trans people and drag culture, as far as you are concerned. I'm going to let your delicate ego believe that. The last thin…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 04:33 PM
0

You do some extreme mental gymnastics to preserve that ego. People like you die alone. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 02:06 PM
0

There are no wide studies on it yet so I'm also waiting on those, maybe they'd prove me right maybe they'd prove me wrong. I think you have confused me with someone else. Not in my thread. Just because I have no desire to doesn't mean I haven't been around them before. I've met several in person and their behavior is specifically why I don't want to associate with them. I had to associate with them almost daily. It was a part of going to work. You still think your perspective on the subject is m…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 09:56 PM
0

You have not given a single peice of evidence that was not anecdotal. You make up statistics (1/3 of drag queens are trans) apparently our experiences witnessing drag culture are different. Yes, they are. You said yourself that you have no desire to associate with these people and you have said that your experience is limited, but somehow you feel that you know more about the subject than I do despite my heavy involvement with the culture and the people that have cultivated the culture. I would …
/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:37 PM
0

May I ask what city? I've seen multiple trans drag queens In San Francisco, New York, Vancouver, and Chicago. Maybe your city is an outlier. No, drag is drag. It is lampooning gender roles and is a comedic caricature of feminine behavior no matter where you go. You just don't get it, clearly. And besides, it doesn't matter where I live. Like I already said, we get a lot of traveler queens that are not from here that I have seen sans makeup. The Rupaul queens come here annually and there are mult…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:56 PM
0

Ok buddy since you know so many drag queens, go to one of their shows and ask everyone there whether they're straight gay or trans and get back to me with numbers. You'll probably be surprised. No, I wouldn't. I worked next door to my city's largest gay bar. It holds drag shows every Wed, Fri, and Saturday. I knew all of the performers, and I knew them well. (even their orders!) There were often traveling queens that performed there too, and they would come to my work with the queens I already k…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:24 PM
0

Drag queens don't dress up to be made fun of though, they do it for their own entertainment and to act like a woman. You're trying to tell me that when my friend Loretta (who is taller than 6 feet, over 250 lbs, and has hairy ass legs) dresses like Tina Turner and lipsynches Proud Mary, while dancing all frantic like Tina, is not trying to get some laughs? Riiiiiiight. You really have no idea what the fuck you are talking about. A lot of them are trans men who do it for fun. You have literally z…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:40 PM
0

No it's still a man. You clearly don't understand the allure of drag. It is supposed to be funny because it is a man, with typical man features (tall, broad shoulders, square jaw, maybe even hairy) that is in a dress and behaving like a caricature of a woman. A person that seriously identifies as a woman is completely different. They feel like a woman and are not lampooning women or gender roles. They do not want to be made fun of or laughed at for wearing a dress. Also I don't really keep up wi…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:09 PM
0

Cis is a fictional term but it is largely trans. I'd estimate 1/3 of drag queens are trans. Holy shit you are stupid. There is nothing "fun" or funny about trans people. It is no longer a man in a dress, it is a woman in a dress at that point. Can you name a famous trans performer if they are at least 1/3 of the queens? It's not the same but it leads up to it occasionally. Not everyone who drinks once a week end up as alcoholics, but some of them do. Not every person who does drag ends up becomi…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:52 PM
0

I've seen trans who crossdress and do drag, it's not even close to being exclusively straight men. So you are saying that it is mostly trans people or mostly sis people? One has to be the majority here. Either way children cross dressing on a regular basis is a slippery slope and sometimes leads to major life altering surgeries that they may end up killing themselves over in the long run. Dressing up is not the same as claiming you are different than your assigned birth gender. You seem to hate …
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:25 PM
0

Well we don't know exactly. I think it is body dismorphia, but I can't prove this. People that cross dress are just cross dressing because it is rebellious and fun. These are two different things. I know men that are straight but like to crossdress and do drag.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:16 PM
0

Yes, accepting your child is the same as forcing your child.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:21 PM
1

I saw video from a show in SF where the "queens" announced their preferred gender, over 1/3 identified as trans and were always met with applause. Sounds like a parody that went over your head. There is a local drag queen here that identifies as a "queen" and her pronoun of choice is "her majesty." My friend is a drag performer that gets called she and he but he doesn't give a fuck. He dresses like a woman so he isn't gonna get his panties in a twist over the wrong pronoun. except when you're a …
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:21 PM
0

What does that have to do with this case?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:58 PM
0

You asked them if they are trans? I have never met a trans drag queen and I know loads of them beyond "drag shows, at least the ones i've seen." What doe sit matter? Many of them are not trans. You just think they are because you're a dipshit that can't tell the difference.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:54 PM
1

Sounds like a far different situation. What you were talking about is someone forcing it on their kid or making their kid think that it is what all little boys do. That is different than accepting that your kid likes that sort of shit.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:11 PM
0

No no no no no no no. You made this about adult drag queens when you said that most of them are transgender. You said Word for Word "a lot of drag queens themselves are actually transgender," this is false. Virtually all drag queens are sis males that dress up like sis females.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:10 PM
0

I highly doubt that. And even if you did, one case does not make it ubiquitous.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:08 PM
2

It's funny that you think being around trans people causes more trans people. They are people, not zombies. You base everything you say off of your stupid opinion.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:40 PM
1

How many drag queens do you know? I know plenty, tons really, and all of them identify as men during the day. I can't think of one that does not.Most of them have normal jobs, like doctors or head chef.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:39 PM
6

You don't know what drag queen means. Wiki explains it like this:A drag queen is a person, usually male, who dresses in clothing of the opposite sex and often acts with exaggerated femininity and in feminine gender roles for the purpose of entertainment or fashion It is female impersonation, plain and simple. It is supposed to be fun, not serious. Your belief that it "makes children trans by being exposed to it" is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:41 AM
0

I've never seen any MRA on this sub claim that Well I have. There are many subscribers here that have stated that abortion should "be a decision between two people," the man and the woman, as if women never end up in abusive relationships. Men, naturally, do not have much control of the birth process after insemination so many men, including some on this sub, want to have that control and they want it desperately. If I had time to bury through my comments I would link you to these nutjobs. It is…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:41 PM
1

I am sorry but I have encountered women haters here more than any where else. If you think you have the right to make decisions about a women's body for her (abortion) then you are against human rights.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:36 PM
2

Watch the Thirteenth on Netflix, please. Every dipshit that says shit like you just did should.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:35 PM
1

Well, this sub has plenty of misogynists within it. Its not that all subscribers here are misogynists, but if you are a misogynist looking for a sub, then I'm sure you're not on r/TwoXChromosomes and I sure know what sub you will like! Same with Republicans. Not all of them are racists, but if you are a racist then I'm sure you're not voting Democrat and I know which party you will like!
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:59 PM
2

Yeah, because men were forced to be bad at school and were also forced to take manual labor jobs.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 08:42 PM
0

I'm sorry, but there is no point in arguing you even though we probably agree on some men's rights issues. Your sources are consistently unacademic. My professors, even the conservative southern ones, would laugh your sources out the door. YOUR SOURCE IS A LLC. FOR FUCKS SAKE. My dipshit parents run a LLC. Stop projecting your own extreme denial and mental illnesses on me sir. A Voice for Men (also known as AVfM, AVFM or AV4M) is a United States-based[1] for-profit limited liability company[2] a…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:01 AM
0

You pick out one issue that your panty is in a twist about, so that makes the ENTIRE ORGANIZATION BIASED! will rarely debunk the feminist line Better than never like actual propaganda sites like Jezebel. I hope Trump eventually eliminates CPB, NPR, NEH, NEA, and the whole rotting lot of them. Because you're a rube. http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/11/23/503146770/npr-finds-the-head-of-a-covert-fake-news-operation-in-the-suburbs NPR does investigative journalism, something we ne…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:03 AM
2

Maybe try reading more of their shit and you will find that it is generally "stay pretty neutral." They are to the left as Infowars/Breitbart is to the right. That is absolutely insane. InfoWars and Breitbart don't do investigative journalism, (they don't even do journalism in my opinion.) Here is an example. http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/11/23/503146770/npr-finds-the-head-of-a-covert-fake-news-operation-in-the-suburbs Alex Jones is a fear mongerer that sells the solution to…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:45 PM
2

Well to the right wing, anything that isn't right wing propaganda is left wing. You frequent NPR? You read their articles? You listen to their broadcasts? I highly doubt it.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:38 PM
1

Though you may have interpreted the NPR headline as negative maybe read the article. The Department of Education will change its approach to campus sexual misconduct and begin a public notice and comment process to issue new regulations, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos announced today. In a speech at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School, DeVos decried "a system run amok," "kangaroo courts" and repeatedly emphasized the plight of the accused. "One rape is one too many ... one perso…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:26 PM
1

Oh my god, shut up. NPR is fair. Don't criticize shit you don't read. They are great journalists. Just because they tell you shit you don't want to hear on a regular basis does not make it "bullshit." The Department of Education will change its approach to campus sexual misconduct and begin a public notice and comment process to issue new regulations, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos announced today. In a speech at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School, DeVos decried "a system run a…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:14 PM
1

It definitely is not a white supremacy sub but some guys on this sub are quite misogynistic. (not saying that many feminists are not also anti-men's rights) Men's rights are human rights, and the right of men should not supersede other humans. I wish everyone on this sub understood that.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:46 PM
0

Where is some data that is less that 3 years old that shows no change?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:53 AM
1

Doesn't matter what your position is, that wasn't the point I was making. The point I was making that the attitude is changing with younger generations and you will not accept that. Your argument was valid maybe 20 and 30 years ago. It definitely was valid 50 years ago, but it is not a valid nowadays because the attitudes have shifted. Lmao! So now the school system is matriarchal! A system made of mostly male administrators is designed to keep men powerless. Sure. I'm a man and I loved school. …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:03 AM
0

For the love of Christ. Your first source only stated that a majority of people preferred the man to be the breadwinner. They gave no statistics, it's just stated that a simple majority are in favor. They gave no analysis on the change, and just implied that there hasn't been much change. Second source stated that a majority of women prefer the man to be the breadwinner, which makes sense seeing that so many women raise children. That source also stated that women make up 47% of the workforce, w…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:14 PM
0

That is your opinion and it is wrong. This can not be proven, it is your perception of the world. If women had no expectation to be primary earner then why are more of them going to college then men Despite the fact that women are capable of having kids, which makes going to school all but impossible?
/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:29 PM
0

Forcing women to have children is more preverse than selective service. There is ZERO net benefit from forcing births. Actually, studies of communist Romania showed that the forced births INCREASED crime and poverty. Selective service is not something anyone wants, but it is for necessary for protection of a state. Putting women in the military by force harms the nation FAR more than forcing men. And that "alter their lives for nine months" bullshit is so ridiculous I don't know where to start. …
/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:25 PM
0

That is a much less reasonable approach. You're not being objective. Selective service is not perfect by any means. It should be reformed, perhaps only those that vote to go to war should be drafted. Your proposal was insane though. If women are drafted to war then the countries future will be fucked. The disruption in production and live births would cause economic collapse for generations. We have to draft men because of our biological inequalities. We do NOT have to force women to have babies…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:52 PM
1

Have a reproduction selection, what?
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:22 PM
1

Younger men do. I know many men that don't date women who can't support themselves and actually prefer women that earn more than they do. Your point is true of older generations but not so much of the young people of today.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:20 PM
1

Fair point. The crazy feminist that demand equality should be pushing for that. I do think men and women are not equal though. If war breaks out, like it did in World War II, the women need to stay here to bear and raise children and maintain the production. Otherwise, our nation's future is bleak win or lose.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 06:22 AM
0

I have many friends where the woman is the primary breadwinner. That is just stupid on so many levels.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 06:21 AM
-2

My point was that you don't "earn" rights. By definition it does not work that way. A right is godgiven at birth.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:58 PM
0

No. I was saying that raising the world's children is hard work. You don't "earn" rights by definition. Saying women have not earned equal treatment is insane.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:57 PM
-6

What responsibilities are not expected of women but are expected of man? I couldn't understand the argument 50 years ago but not today.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:57 PM
-50

Well, women do because they have to...... Attitudes of men like this guy are why feminists exist. These men don't think that women deserve equal rights and do what they can to assure that they don't.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:56 PM
3

Apparently if you support men's rights you can't support women's rights. Human rights are only important to your own kind.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:55 PM
-11

^ Everything that is wrong with the sub condensed into one comment. ^ Being pro men's rights SHOULDNT mean you're a misogynist. You bear a child and raise it and then tell me about work and "earning" rights.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:49 PM
1

I understand how the market works dude. Teaching is a government paid job though, so it is not held down to the same market constraints as any other job. We as a we society decide how much we are going to pay teachers. We have been cutting budgets for years and states like Oklahoma have severely cut teachers wages and/or benefits, not based on the market being saturated with teachers but to balance a budget. You Can't blame everything on the market, especially when the states have been slashing …
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:16 PM
0

And paying people shitty wages attracts low-skilled people to educate our future generations. You can spout market worship BS all you want, paying teachers low wages does not attract intelligent people to teaching. We shoot ourselves in the foot.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:13 PM
-2

Early education is of little value. Really, what IS the point?!?!?! /s
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:34 PM
1

And aside from everything else, when you guys say that you would rather die than suck a dick you are probably making some men that were raped few less than. These men have a higher rate of suicide and depression and hearing shit like that is not helping them.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 04:46 PM
1

Lmao
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:18 PM
3

You're exactly right, everybody's level of repulsion is different and I find it annoying that straight people assume that gay people are equally disgusted by their sex. That was my entire point. What started this whole thing was that a guy said that he was sure gay people would also rather eat dog shit than have straight sex. That is patently ridiculous. I worked at a pet store for years, cleaning up dog shit all day. I would stick my tongue deep into any sweaty period pussy before I would eat d…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:10 PM
1

Forcible rape is different than saying "i'd rather eat dog shit or die then suck a dick, and I'm sure gay people feel the same about straight people." Nobody put a gun to these peoples head and told him to suck a dick. They just started making this analogy themselves. If actually put in the situation I doubt they would let their pride get in the way that much. People do crazy shit to survive.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:02 PM
1

Sexuality is not a choice. You're right. Being a bitchy, suicidal, overdramatic, queen is. You're weak if you chose death over dick. You are weaker than the limp wristed flamers that I make cry when I fuck them.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:56 PM
-1

Not what I said. If gay shit isn't for you, I understand. But If you say that you would rather die then suck a dick you're being an over dramatic baby. You are being a queen. You're being a little bitch. Man up, suck the dick, save your life.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:49 PM
1

I thought of that but I didn't even when I get into all of that. You're so right.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:46 PM
-4

Yeah, you're an overdramatic baby. Sure you ain't gay?
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:45 PM
-13

Straight guys are trained in the thinking like that. All their lives they see gays as aids infested weirdos that want to suck their dick. (No matter how attractive the straight man is) Plus, straight men are made to feel emasculated just by being attracted to any man. They are also trained into thinking that if you find one man attractive, somehow that makes you automatically gay as well. And then to top it all off most straight dudes think that they have to get it up the butt to have sex with a…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:44 PM
-10

You're an idiot. You'd prefer death to 10 minutes of being uncomfortable. Objectively, you are a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:39 PM
1

It's a really stupid attempt on their part as kids like to rebel against what their parents try to get them to do anyway.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:33 PM
-12

I am straight I would rather eat dog shit than be with a man. I am sure gay people feel the same exact way about the opposite sex. . Gay people are not that fucking unreasonable. I can't think of a single gay person I know that would rather eat dog shit then screw a woman. Equating gay sex to eating dog shit is a dick move dude. Source: am gay EDIT: I worked at a pet store for years cleaning up dog shit all day. I would love to see y'all down a full load of shit produced by a chow chow puppy on …
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:32 PM
1

So are men as vulnerable to sexual assault and rape as women?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:59 PM
1

Late term abortion is not allowed for "choice" reasons.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:31 AM
0

Because early term abortions are only covered by Roe v Wade. That is the only window for "choice"
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:29 AM
-2

No, women aren't the ones that refuse to wear condoms cause "they can't stay hard with them" so it is a different issue. And I seriously doubt any court would enforce the contract if she changed her mind, since child support is legally viewed to be a right of the child, not the mother. That is your opinion. When you sign a contract you sign your rights away. Those are the exact same arguments anti-abortionists use. You're a hypocrite. It is not my fault that there aren't as many options for men.…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:27 AM
2

That is insane. Society already has enough orphans.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:21 AM
2

As of now they only have condoms, unfortunately. Once male birth control is a thing, things will change.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:20 AM
2

Agreed. It would save society money.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:19 AM
0

You can't abort, tough shit. Men and women are NOT equal. We have different capabilities and problems due to our biological inequalities. Laws should just be as fair to all three parties as possible. She can't be led to believe he will help, only to be ditched. He can't be forced to pay for everything, especially if she doesn't work/ is a dead beat. The kid has to eat, have a decent life.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:18 AM
3

Well these people talk about women's health out of their ass.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:15 AM
3

BABIES CAN, YOU FUCKING MORON. Embryos can't! They definitely have no perception in the first trimester. They don't begin feeling things BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO DISCERNIBLE BRAIN FUNCTION!
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:32 AM
-2

Then be careful and selective with your sexual partners, I don't know what to tell you buddy. It sucks, but the kid has to have a decent life even though he has a crazy bitch mom.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:27 AM
1

Men and women are NOT equal. I never said they were. We have different capabilities and problems due to our biological inequalities. The law should treat them as fair as possible, true. But women obviously are getting screwed concerning reproductive rights. They have been under attack this entire decade. What rights have men lost this decade?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:26 AM
-4

Well it is just as realistic as men not paying child support. I was making a point how ridiculous men are that think they shouldn't have to pay child support just because they don't want to have a kid. You put it in. You made your bed now lay in it, deadbeat.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:24 AM
1

A child is sentient. A fetus isn't.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:19 AM
0

It is women's rights, so it is very relevant. Reproductive rights have been under attack this entire decade. What rights have you lost in the last 8 years?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:18 AM
-11

That is just the way it goes. You can't make medical decisions for someone else. Don't want a kid? Don't have sex. Wear a condom. Make her sign a contract abdicating you of fatherhood. You are not powerless in the matter.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:17 AM
-7

If they had sex, they agreed to. Make her sign something before sex, then you're abdicated! Good luck getting it in after that though.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:16 AM
1

The only way you can is by making her sign something BEFORE SEX. Good luck getting laid!
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:14 AM
1

Mens rights seems to trump Childs rights.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:14 AM
-1

Well you don't have to put your body through hell to have a kid. Gender has its pros and cons. You can always make a woman sign a contract that abdicates you of fatherhood. You just won't get laid, ever.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:13 AM
3

I don't presume the intent of the law. Thus far, the Supreme Court has decided that so long as the one clinic remains open, the law is upheld. I'd agree it's indisputable at least one clinic remain open in the state, but I fail to see how the law was not upheld otherwise. The Supreme Court shares my view. I don't care what the law is. It is using regulation to put clinics out of business. You seem to be unaware of the tactics used. The states have passed laws that make the clinics have to abide …
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:11 AM
1

When it is in the first trimester. Duh. You can't get late term abortions willy nilly. "Choice" is only protected in the first trimester on a state level.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:59 AM
2

Seriously, it is NOT a baby. It has the potential, but it is not a baby yet.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:57 AM
-5

Can you bear children? I know you may really desire it, but you never will have that privilege.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:57 AM
-10

Because they can't bear children, correct.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:56 AM
-6

Some insurances cover BC for hormonal regulation with PCOS. "Some" means nothing to you if you don't have it. Viagras only covered as a blood thinner not for ED. Well isn't that convenient, a pill targeted to older men with ED also works as a 'blood thinner'. Aspirin is a blood thinner too, there are so many cheaper options.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:56 AM
4

Men and women are not equal, I never said they are. We have different capabilities due to our biological inequalities. If you think you should a have a say in a women's health decisions then fuck you. It is NOT your body.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:57 AM
3

It is just that they are confusing "men's rights" with "human rights."
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:54 AM
11

Because they can't bear children, correct.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:39 AM
31

You can get an abortion in Mississippi. Placing terms on it doesn't remove your access or violate Roe v. Wade. Placing burdensome regulations on clinics is bullshit, and you know it. There is one clinic in the entire state. The law is meant to inconvenience women to dissuade them from getting the abortion. And most women get abortion for health reasons. Your average woman getting an abortion has already had a kid and is in her late 20s to early 30s. If she could have had the kid, she would. Birt…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:03 AM
142

Except when they need an abortion in Mississippi. Or when they need birth control. (Viagra is covered by most insurance plans but congressman raise all kinds of hell over birth control) So this girl doesn't know what she's talking about. Hard to 'get the fuck OVER IT' when 'it' is an abortion you have to travel across the state to get.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:35 AM
1

What makes you think this?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:48 PM
1

I'm a he.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:48 PM
0

Teaching is not easy. You're a babysitter, a counselor, a social worker, and on top of that you have to attempt to make children sit still and learn algebra against their will. It might have seemed like an easy path but it definitely isn't. I know servers that make almost as much as teachers. That is the easy path. And I don't know where you live but in Missouri a two year degree from a community college allows you to sub, not actually teach.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:48 PM
13

This is ridiculous. People want babysitters through the day. It's not going to change anytime soon.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:13 AM
59

And teacher's tend to be women which has the worst rate of return as far as degrees go. (education) It isn't like all these women fucked around and got worthless degrees dude.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:26 PM
1

Well that is a very simplistic view that, if you had your way, would result in millions of orphans.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 03:31 AM
-1

By that argument it is every man's fault if he didn't wear a condom and make her sign an agreement before having sex. These are precautions you could take. But are they convenient? No. Fertility status is a myth. Even if she has been told she's infertile as long as she has a spotty period then she is fertile. I'm not saying whether or not it should be all her decision, that's just how it goes because it is inside of her body. That's an important factor. Womens' bodies want them to be pregnant. E…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 08:12 PM
-3

It pretty much does. You don't have to carry the thing inside of you. It sucks, but if she decides to get an abortion you have to accept it. On the flip side, if she decides to keep it you can't force her to get an abortion. Men's autonomy should be respected but so should a woman's. Some things transcend women's and men's right and it is a human right to make medical descisions for yourself. If you want the counsel of your significant other that is up to you. If you don't want to listen to your…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 06:11 PM
-1

I'm all for men's rights. But c'mon. You can't force a woman to carry your child. Her rights need to be respected too.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter