TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

havingread Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by havingread on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Honestly, this is a pretty shit and shallow post and you should resubmit it with more information. Perhaps some deeper analysis too. Even then, if it's focused on women, then this is the result you will get. In itself I don't see a problem there.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 10:38 PM
2

What is this even?
/r/MensRights10/08/15 10:19 PM
0

1940 would like a word with you.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:34 AM
88

I'd like to remind everyone of the outrage you might have felt when reading "they made up quotes from the MRM" posts.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:25 PM
-16

Ireland is a shit country Don't be a cunt.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:37 AM
41

The moment you engage in unprovoked acts of violence against women you become a feminist in my eyes That's dumb
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:50 PM
0

Please don't reply to this guy
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:49 PM
2

Time is money.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 01:55 AM
6

Complain when mothers are praised on Father's Day, praise fathers on Mother's Day.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:21 AM
3

I wouldn't call that a good answer. There's more to a war than the front lines. Factories and such. Women aren't drafted to work, but men are drafted to the front which, along with the horrors, also entails work.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:27 AM
6

Humorous exaggeration?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:17 AM
1

What is etymology?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 07:36 PM
3

Except you'd endure doublethink babbles about how studies should be done properly but the one they support is still doubleplusgood. Unless you're talking to someone who'd open minded and making them think critically about the subject.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:24 AM
8

I breathed sad lols, but lols nevertheless in amusement of the hypocrisy. "1 in 4 is bullshit because x, 1 in 2 is true despite x". Seriously, lads. Stand by your own bloody standards. Commendations to you.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:52 PM
1

It's funny because there'll be people on here sincerely saying that.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:17 AM
0

I was referring to OP who complained about the joke.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:36 AM
9

I'm sure the vast majority of people know it happens, it's that a lot think it 'doesnt' count'. Not just in a statistical, legal or political regard, but also in the damage it can do.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:13 AM
2

I giggled at the thought of that.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:39 AM
4

'Distasteful' is what people call offensive jokes they don't find funny. I for one find dirty jokes to be made extra funny by the offense.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:39 AM
2

Complaining about offensive jokes is indeed a bit zealous.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:37 AM
0

I agree with that. I was responding to OP's title.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:34 AM
0

Many awful situations are the butt of jokes in comedy. Murder, dismemberment, cancer, slavery, rape, racism, dead babies and, yes, domestic violence against both men and women. Making fun of awful things is a large part of comedy and it's funny as fuck. What do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Nothing you haven't told her twice before. Doctor: "It's bad news, you have cancer and Alzheimer's." Patient: "Oh well, at least I don't have cancer." Domestic Violence Jokes. Maybe we should do away …
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:32 AM
-26

Offensive comedy? Shocking. We must do something about this, führer .
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:29 PM
15

Press release voluntary male circumcision provide voluntary male circumcision services to nearly 650,000 men Another PSI article safe male circumcision services for adolescents and men A step up from baby boys.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:50 PM
11

rape is NOT just about "a small subpopulation of men who choose to commit rape. Ah. What satisfying distress.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:57 PM
3

Hey, OP, we noticed you made some rather large presumptions. Try not to do that next time.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:09 AM
3

Does any one have more links of her in discussions, debates or conversations with people who aren't MRAs?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:55 PM
2

http://www.gmp.police.uk/content/WebAttachments/88A190F67550078780257A71002E5DC8/$File/claire%27s%20law%20other%20people%20booklet.pdf http://www.ntu.ac.uk/apps/news/151610-15/Expert_opinion_Clares_Law_victims_names_and_the_police.aspx The law itself is gender neutral. It's the articles that are ignoring male victims, not the law. Do your research (or at least a few Google searches) and spread less ignorance, ey.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:57 AM
13

There's an ironically large number of people here to employ methods similar to feminism because "no, we're right". It pretty much becomes fem'masculism'. Same stuff, genders reversed. Look at the title of this post. The article seems egalitarian to me and she was disappointed, not hurt in her 'feelz'. She came here with an open mind to give this place a chance, but there isn't enough opposition here to 'them vs. us' mentality.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:05 PM
7

Were it not for the easily found tactlessly hostile posters here, this article might be shedding a better light on this place.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:58 PM
1

I can hear the reactionaries already.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:47 AM
26

"OMG, YOU ARE A RAPE APOLOGIST TOO!?! That was too much.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:51 AM
-2

I think the person on FB means to say women are shamed for having sex.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 03:00 AM
1

Much logical.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 09:54 AM
4

I'm sure a thorough explanation will be given in the show, but could you give us a brief one now?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:34 PM
9

Rape culture Social rape Sounds like gender swapped feminist writing. I've heard on the show the disagreement with calling things rape which very clearly aren't. It's a disservice to the MRM to borrow feminist language and reasoning, because that's where we largely disagree with them. Of course you're not equating looking at someone lustfully with rape, but you're using the same principle of calling something rape which isn't in order to bundle it in with other connotations of violation and so o…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:39 PM
0

That's very rude of you. You're sounding fanatic.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:06 AM
1

Wow those comments. I think I'm going to lay down for a while to recover.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 03:46 AM
14

The judge said it detracts from real rape victims, not that they're the 'real' victims. The father's an idiot though, saying the punishment is taking it too far. What a joke.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 12:36 AM
14

I applaud this. A large part of the MRM is fighting against feminism, more because of the fallacies that litter the path to feminist conclusions than the conclusions themselves. That is,a after all, how you argue against a conclusion. It only follows that the MRM should hold itself to the standards it's trying to enforce on its opposition.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:21 AM
1

It can be used as preventative treatment when the patient consents. His VanBuren's swimmer friend could have had his circumcision when he was able to consent and before the swimming, instead of when he was a baby and might not have had a problem at all. You don't perform harmful preventative treatment to all people when only some might be at risk.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 05:22 PM
2

It's done in Islam as well. Social attitudes need to change, because politicians only play on that.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 06:00 PM
4

There's a premise. Perhaps, to the joy of those who like ballet, you'd leap towards your conclusion without landing on some fallacies?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:48 AM
6

You're being presumptuous about me and the story of 'Karen'. There's no indication in the article that the other men were aware that she was trying to cuckold. If they were, shame on them, if not then they're victims as well, though only regarding the children. I don't understand how preventing and shaming this would be oppressive: It's not what she's doing to herself, its' what shes doing to others. I'm equally offended by both sexes cheating, however women aren't tricked into raising children …
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:50 AM
6

No one advocates forcing the victim from their home, but having somewhere to stay is very helpful. They may be forced out by the abuser or staying after the abuser has been sent packing leaves them at risk. Other people are unable to get help while at home and their only option is to run away. Shelters keep the victims safe while they take further steps to stop the abuse.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:59 PM
8

This is an article about someone deceiving a man into responsibility for children that aren't his, and you say oppression of women's sexuality.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:55 PM
11

Escaping the home is often part of escaping the abuse and is a positive option to have. Shelters exist to help victims and are necessary. I think you're making a leap there.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:15 PM
0

the fact that there are... The fact is.... I don't have empirical evidence to support this, but its my gut instinct Okay.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:03 PM
0

I got to page 4 before I gave up. I don't see what you're talking about. Could you show me where it is?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:37 AM
14

I had a good laugh reading that. Then I sighed.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:00 AM
21

That quotation is from a comment. Take a trip to YouTube and gain some perspective on comments.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:58 AM
1

I suggest you hold yourself and your views to higher standards than those of feminism. It's how you've reached your conclusions that make them better.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 06:45 AM
1

I found it to be less 'you go girl' to women in general, but more 'don't be a bitch so other can 'go''.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:35 AM
0

A stupid list item, but it's on the female list as well. Haha, you kind of have to make your post gender neutral, don't you?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:33 AM
0

You should feel silly because my post was a call for cases, studies, and citations. You responded with a demand of citations from me. I wrote nothing either way on the issue, just that one should show why it's the case.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:50 AM
-1

I'll simplify my post for you. Show evidence when you state facts like these. I hope you read yours again and feel silly.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:31 PM
-2

This may be how you perceive it to be interpreted by society, but legally they're the same thing. If you have facts to show that there's descrimination in the law or conviction; or whatever possible facts there could be to show the social double standard, please present them instead of what I honestly must describe as an unsupported circlejerking.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 07:29 PM
2

People post stupid shit on the Internet. This is one of those instances where you shouldn't give a shit and ignore the trolls.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:08 AM
16

For others looking for it: "After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics"
/r/MensRights20/10/13 09:15 PM
1

Generally there's nothing illegal about it and that would be ridiculous. They're adults. However, it's often bad for their professional relationship and I think it's the organisations perogative to punish and deter it. In some places you'll find laws regarding positions of trust which are there to protect people above the age of consent but not yet adults from abuse.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 09:13 PM
0

Those things aren't necessarily present in the article.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 08:58 PM
15

In the unemployment answer I see no issue. Although very presumptuous I don't see sexism and Elli, the writer, seems supportive of both parties. Again very presumptuous in the second answer, inferring not just possible criminality but stating it in fact was from 'I wanted to be friends with him only, but he kept pushing for it to be a relationship'. Ellie writes: 'But in reality, and in retrospect, this was different from rejection. It was abuse by a professional who harassed and took advantage …
/r/MensRights20/10/13 12:33 AM
4

'For the purposes of this Statute: (a) "Group" means: a number of people joined by racial or cultural roots, ethnic origin or descent, religious affiliation or linguistic links, gender identity or sexual orientation, or any other characteristics of a similar nature.' Only the last criterion could be applied to protect feminism, but it also applies to those spreaking for mens rights. 'The purpose of this Statute is to: (e) Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to e…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 11:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter