TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

heb0 Archive

View 1 post and 58 comments by heb0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
127

social mediaheb0/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 12:54 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Cognitive dissonance gets misused on reddit, but I think this is an actual example of it. You've been confronted with evidence that can't be reconciled with the not-evidence-based worldview you hold, and it has made you extremely angry, and you've chosen to lash out at us. By the way, most of your posts are getting deleted in here by auto-filters, I assume because of the abusive language. I'm glad that I checked your comment history, because it was really funny to see that you've wasted your tim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/25 02:24 PM
0

They were clearly downvoted
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 05:21 PM
3

get no compensation from her labor While there are major issues with traditional gender roles, this is not an honest framing of them. An egalitarian society would still have some families with a stay at home mother or father. That person not being paid a wage by their spouse doesn’t make the arrangement exploitative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/24 05:35 PM
2

Trump really cares about due process, indicated by how he treated the Central Park Five, right? That was a Devos action. Trump doesn’t give a shit about due process.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 09:14 PM
5

I think it’s just because there’s a lot of variability. Just because some reddit exec said misandry isn’t hate speech doesn’t mean that an automated system won’t flag it, that a staff member wont identify the hate, or that a reasonable mod won’t delete the content themselves. There are a lot of mods even on women-centric subs that don’t hate men in their lives and will remove and ban for men-bashing. I think there is value in some forums (e.g. monopolized or government-controlled spaces) priorit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 08:48 PM
5

I will second this. People on this sub point out that the admins have a semi-stated policy of not deleting misandry, but in practice, I've had a lot of success with getting it removed and users banned for spreading it by reporting. And the success rate isn't even 100% in the "conventional" direction of prejudice, either. I reported a post in which people were literally calling black people monkeys and got an automated message saying it wasn't rule-breaking, probably because the admin or bot didn…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 08:31 PM
9

Republicans speak to a world in which men have value and respect. It’s superficial, but it’s something other than scorn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 05:14 PM
5

Trump is bad for men primarily because, policy-wise, he is worse for research on men’s mental and physical health, workplace safety and labor issues, homelessness, policing, incarceration, addiction treatment, education, and the military (make no mistake, despite the rhetoric on Dems being warhawks and Trump not starting any wars, all evidence is that his cabinet had to reign him in to stop him from escalating conflicts). Not because he gives misandrists fuel to be misandrists. While true, I str…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 05:12 PM
1

Gender is one of the weakest demographic predictors of opinion on abortion. The difference between men and women in polling, when it shows up, is modest and could be reasonably expected given that a portion of people are going to be driven totally by self-interest, and men won’t ever be in a situation where they personally need an abortion. The people enforcing these rules taking away women’s right to bodily autonomy are religious, conservative men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/24 02:13 PM
3

I can’t imagine trying to pressure my children to live a particular lifestyle like that OP. Any normal community would call that out. That sub certainly wouldn’t approve of a parent sending videos to their kid about why they should get married and have children. Reddit feminist communities are fostering the same antisocial, bitter, and paranoid mindsets that male incel communities do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/24 03:04 AM
10

There is no compelling evidence that the death penalty deters crime any more than imprisonment, and a lot of evidence that it leads to the murder of innocents by the state. It also costs much more than imprisonment and no claims that it can be made cheaper successfully explain how those changes wouldn’t lead to even more wrongful executions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 05:10 PM
64

These individuals blocked reviews which were backed by the courts system and could have investigated this man’s potential innocence. They didn’t do this based on evidence. They did this based on hatred of black men. If you take even a second to look into the political history of these guys, they never quit playing politics with their positions. They’re just culture wars demagogues. This is especially disgusting for an AG. I’ll note that I’m awfully skeptical of “he was no angel” arguments over s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 01:49 AM
107

The Missouri governor and AG are evil people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 12:27 AM
8

I find the idea of sex robots dystopian and depressing. Just another example of the commodification of human connection by creating or taking advantage of (often artificial) scarcity. They seem like just another step in normalizing modern sex/companionship trade, similar to onlyfans, strip clubs, dating sites, and the parasocial side of streaming. That said, I don’t think they, or any of those above mentioned things, should be illegal. It’s not my place to impose my morals on how people use thei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 06:39 PM
13

At my elementary school, an unknown student once spread feces on the walls of the boy’s bathroom. This led to a meeting between our female principal and only the male fifth and sixth grade boys (the oldest two classes) in which she told all of us that she fully expected our parents would get calls later in our life about how we had been arrested and they needed to come pick us up from jail, because of the path we were all on. Learning years later that behavior like that is commonly a sign of abu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/24 02:34 PM
2

I think most of us are. If it didn’t work, social media vampires wouldn’t do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 04:04 AM
3

Really hope this sub doesn’t veer in the direction of posting ragebait. There’s an unlimited supply, but limited opportunity for discussion when the prompt isn’t even sincere. Sure, you might be able to find ways it conforms to traditional gender roles and criticize that, but when the motivation is “what outrageous things can I say to generate engagement”, it’s mostly a waste of time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 03:57 AM
0

hence No, that doesn’t follow at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/24 01:03 PM
24

This is a pretty central LWMA position. Calling it a feminist talking point is just poisoning the well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/24 06:13 AM
12

“Almost everyone knows someone that’s been robbed, but nobody knows a robber.” Just as true of a statement. Damn, and their version was supposed to prove something?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 07:46 PM
2

french men are known all over the world as good lovers Has your entire exposure to the outside world been through romance novels or something? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:05 AM
47

The first draft has his phone number in the signature.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 01:55 AM
3

If this is enough to make you dip out, then you were never really interested in participating here anyway. Your history here has literally been: show up, immediately and broadly criticize the community, engage negligibly when you receive pushback, and then throw your hands up, declare us a lost cause, and leave. So I reiterate my belief that you were never here in good faith to begin with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 04:56 PM
7

I suggest actually reading the comments they recently posted. There is a gulf between their stance and red-pill views. Characterizing anyone who disagrees with you as red-pill is dishonest. The fact that people on this sub disagree with them on patriarchy theory and whether or not there is a femicide epidemic does not prove that there is a red-pill contingent represented here. They’re essentially espousing somewhat radical feminist beliefs and then saying “oh, but I’m an LWMA.” So where exactly …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 03:43 PM
10

You seem to think that you are somehow special and that your opinions by default should be accepted. I’ve read a few of your recent comments here and they seem to be heavily you trying to police what views are and aren’t acceptable. Why are you surprised that it isn’t well received when you center every topic around patriarchy theory? You even are promoting the conspiracy theory that there’s a massive hidden problem of femicide that the media isn’t reporting on. Your views are very disconnected …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 03:08 PM
5

You first said you didn’t see an example. You’re now saying it’s instead that you just didn’t see any evidence of the example that you previously said you didn’t see. You aren’t acting in good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/24 05:08 PM
3

Try reading it again, more slowly, starting with the phrase “as in the example of.” If you’re still having trouble, find a friend to read it out loud for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/24 05:04 PM
4

Do you have trouble reading? The post that started this thread gave an example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/24 04:56 PM
10

Right wingers famously base their worldview around positions that make their "enemies" mad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 05:56 AM
20

Most murderers being male does not mean most males are murderers. Should we be afraid of black people based on the same reasoning?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:17 AM
28

No, we should not. Quit encouraging misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 02:26 AM
159

The people on Reddit who will argue that women should stash money away in case their partner becomes an abuser—and that men shouldn’t feel betrayed by this—will argue that a man asking his partner for a paternity test of their child is revealing an unforgivable betrayal of trust—and that his partner should leave him for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 08:31 PM
1

So I'm judging you in how you are misappropriating their hardship into something it isn't for a cheap internet argument. That's just low. You live half a world away and you dare accuse me of not caring about my friends and family. Go fuck yourself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/24 01:12 AM
2

You're not here in good faith. You lie, then mimic the criticism directed at you when people call out your lies. That's obvious to anyone who cares to read your posts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/24 01:03 AM
2

I thought at first that they were just here in good faith but were misinformed, but these recent posts are making me feel like they're not. They're clearly smart enough to understand why it's inappropriate to compare absolute numbers of occurrences between populations of very different sizes, but they don't seem to care that it's misleading. It's also suspicious that every "mistake" they make is in the direction of downplaying men's issues. They're literally in here calling themselves a LWMA whi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/24 05:06 PM
1

I just figured you might be interested in educating yourself seeing as you were spouting off false claims and ignorant judgements of miners. But you seem to be a pretty incurious person so I’m not holding out much hope.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/24 03:15 PM
1

Sedentary lifestyles being unhealthy doesn’t prove your false claim because you need to show that the risks of desk work are higher than the risks of trades work. Your article says nothing about relative risks. My article in fact does, and you’ve still failed to justify why you should disregard it. You’re just inventing reasons to do so because it proves you wrong, and you can’t take being wrong. The fact that you’d imply I’m a red piller just for correcting your misinformation is enough evidenc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/24 03:14 PM
1

Relative risk is the only way to compare the dangerousness of these industries. You don’t have a point here, you’re just dead wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/24 03:11 PM
2

I’ve already explained why you’re wrong. You’re just restating your already debunked claim about the article without showing any consideration of my explanation of why it is wrong, and then outright lying about what I said. You can’t even grasp the concept of per-capita numbers but you have the nerve to behave like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 09:39 PM
2

No, I made the argument that, in the west, men are overrepresented in the trades, which disproportionately include careers that are dangerous and debilitating to the body. And it’s hardly an argument, seeing as it’s plainly backed up by statistics. Are you even a left wing male advocate? Every post you make seems to be a failed gotcha attempt at downplaying men’s issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 09:35 PM
1

If you’re really interested in understanding the issues at play here, Uneven Ground: Appalachia Since 1945 by Ronald D. Eller does a great job of exploring why attempts to address poverty in Appalachia have failed. It’s not a matter of people being stubborn and refusing help. It’s a matter of outsiders not listening to the people about the problems they experience and instead assuming they know better and throwing money at programs to build bigger roads so that people can commute out of the area…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 09:30 PM
1

Are you under the impression that people working in the textile industry in Bangladesh are college educated, or did you forget the argument you’re making?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 02:55 PM
1

No, my source doesn’t agree with you. What you’re claiming is that because my source looked at late career mortality, that must mean that the same trend doesn’t hold for young people. But that’s not how burden of proof works. You’re trying to say “you haven’t disproven my arbitrary moving of the goalposts, which means I’m correct.” The researchers looked at a cohort over a long period of time (decades) to track mortality, which means they inherently will be producing numbers that show death rate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 02:53 PM
2

The number of coal miners in the US fluctuates in the 40-60k range. The number of public school teachers in the US is 3.5 million. So taking your numbers as true and assuming incorrectly that only teachers die in school shootings (and not the vastly larger number of students), you still would find that miners die at a 39x higher rate. If you’re too stupid to understand what a denominator is, you’re not equipped to debate this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 02:48 PM
1

Nope, not playing whatever game you’re trying to here. The conclusion pretty clearly shows that types of tasks which most typically fall under trades jobs decrease life expectancy over the course of a career. You’ve provided no source for your questionable claim that trades jobs are healthier, and I’ve provided one that directly contradicts that claim. If you want to argue otherwise you need to engage with the paper rather than being a sarcastic asshole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/24 07:47 PM
1

Nope, not playing whatever game you’re trying to hear. The conclusion pretty clearly shows that types of tasks which most typically fall under trades jobs decrease life expectancy over the course of a career. You’ve provided no source for your questionable claim that trades jobs are healthier, and I’ve provided one that directly contradicts that claim. If you want to argue otherwise you need to engage with the paper rather than being a sarcastic asshole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/24 07:46 PM
1

Results: The exposures, physical heaviness and sitting had a non-linear, inverse relationship. During the 26-year follow-up, 1536 men and 759 women died. Among men, physical heaviness of work was positively associated and sitting at work was negatively associated with all-cause, cardiovascular and external cause mortality but they were not associated with cancer mortality. The HRs for men in the highest quartile of physical heaviness of work compared with men in the lowest quartile were 1.54 (1.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/24 02:33 PM
2

Trades are typically more dangerous and harder on the body than jobs requiring a college degree, and they typically offer lesser career mobility, so I take issue with the claim that male disadvantages in higher education are even partially mitigated by their overrepresented in the trades. That disparity in and of itself is an inequality that men face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/24 11:11 PM
1

As long as you get the last word, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/23 01:21 AM
2

I don’t think the moderators have done any such thing. The sidebar even mentions that trans issues are relevant. You’re either misinformed or acting in bad faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/23 04:48 PM
1

It’s very possible, but I don’t think the way that social media provides immediate access to a large audience promotes it. The reward mechanism for sharing content and receiving engagement also is harmful. You need to be humble and respectful of the weight your words are given when people view you as an authority, but a lot of public figures seem like they get addicted in a way to that role and spiral into crazier and crazier beliefs. Instead of being cautious and fact-checking themselves, the p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/23 04:45 PM
8

In addition to what others have said, he’s pushed misinformation on climate change and diet. While nobody is an expert of everything, when a pattern like this emerges you eventually have to question a person’s overall self-awareness, critical thinking, and ability to evaluate new information. If he’s not able to filter bullshit before spreading it to his audience, that’s a big sign he isn’t qualified as a public educator. Public educators need to be extremely cautious and discerning before they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/23 02:18 PM
11

The problem with changing the original meaning of the term to include this different meaning is that it allows people to place a vague economic value on the degree to which they worry about things and therefore claim that their partner needs to make efforts to “pay” for this worry. Why not use different terms to capture that organization and strategic planning are also household chores, and that having a partner recognize your feelings and help you navigate them are common roles in a relationshi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/22 01:29 PM
24

Emotional labor is the concept of having to perform emotions as part of your job description, as is common for customer-facing job and service industries. It’s not the concept of winding yourself up into a frenzy over whether or not the neighbors are going to think your Christmas cards are tacky.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/22 03:36 AM
7

I think there’s some difference in the way in which male and female victims are dismissed, though. Women seem to be more often viewed as incompetent (e.g. being told they misinterpreted the situation or were unintentionally leading their assaulter on), while men are taken to be competent, but offenses against them are viewed as unimportant because they’re more disposable (e.g. sure, she forced herself on you, but you’re a man, so if you didn’t want it you could have stopped her; OR you should ju…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/22 06:42 PM
47

"Take women seriously" would have been a much better slogan. It affirms the validity of investigating credible accusations instead of reflexively dismissing them like social conservatives do to protect powerful people (I say "people" here to be inclusive, but for conservative, typically religious institutions, the explicitly powerful really are men in most cases). It also is an effective appeal for people who emotionally deny the possibility of sexual abuse happening to good women (or men) becau…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/22 05:55 AM
68

Isn't it funny how all of those insults promote traditional gender roles? "Pick-me" = a woman who competes for male attention, and I would say with the accompanying implication that she "gives it up" too easily. "Incel/virgin" = a sexually unsuccessful man who fails to convince women to be with him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/22 01:08 AM
46

I agree. I think a succinct way of putting this is, as a general rule: feminists apply a societal-scale perspective to harmful behaviors by or against women, and a personal-scale perspective to harmful behaviors by or against men. This leads them to diagnose women's problems in terms of institutional injustice and men's problems in terms of personal responsibility. A woman behaves badly? Well what are the societal pressures that might have pushed her toward this behavior? A man behaves badly? We…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/21 09:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter