TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hedic Archive

View 0 posts and 110 comments by hedic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I have always been an men's rights activist. My older brother was a victim of family court but also my niece who I held in my arms on the day of her birth was a victim. She was shunted off to the female even though said female was a known drug addict. Even after he got custody (it took multiple heroin overdoses to qualify a man for custody) he was attacked for "support". My niece was subjected to an amount of abuse that I try not think about because a father isn't as valid as mother. Even with d…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:23 AM
17

You guys haven't reached the threat of murder stage yet? How cute.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:11 PM
2

It can join the No True Feminist fallacy.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:42 AM
1

It's weird to me how these literally crazy people can hold such a high office.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:23 PM
13

No it isn't. Explaining something in a douchey manner is a thing but it's not inherently gendered.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 11:23 AM
3

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights11/07/22 11:16 AM
3

I mean it's still Zimbabwe. Unfortunately kicking her ass wouldn't have been an issue.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 01:57 AM
2

I have to imagine that was as much an eye-opening as anything else. "Oh this is what they mean by not being allowed to talk about it"
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:20 PM
7

If your plan revolves on trusting a nine year old then it's a bad plan.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 03:15 PM
1

I haven't followed this at all but if it's true that all his accusers have been caught out in lies then that is an issue
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:20 AM
1

Yup it funny how extreme feminists are both misogynistic and misandrist.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:35 AM
1

Debtors prison is live and we'll in America.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:33 AM
1

The thing is she proposed this before the RvW thing. It's kinda scary how many representatives are just fucking nuts. Just look at the Jewish space laser chick.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:30 AM
1

It seems like she proposed this law before. So it's not just reactionary. She is legit nuts.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:26 AM
2

At least to try for it.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:13 AM
58

Lets do the "jew test" Fuck Jews. Yeah. It's hate speech.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:07 AM
9

Is it reasonable to treat all men like adult babies? The original post was sexist as shit and then this chick just doubled down. Men have a right not to be treated like shit for being men. Edit: I will also note that you are a young account posting almost exclusively in this sub with some vile takes. Suss.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 12:52 AM
3

I'll second all the comments here break off. That said dont make it forever. Family is important and she may change.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:04 AM
4

I'm going to respond to the reactionary part of you post. Many people on this sub only realized the issue after being subject some sort of abuse. Then they saw the disregard society held for their pain. Anyone would be angry after that. They lash out. It's not optimal but it's just a human fact. The important thing is groups like ours that can regulate that and turn it towards good instead of extremism.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:56 AM
1

I feel like you are being sarcastic but minus the sarcasm you are right. My bros are a tight knit group that have supported each other through some hard times. Men are not "known" to be humans because certain groups always portray them as animals.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:39 AM
9

"You have to murder your son" I would think its pretty hard to mischaracterize that but if you can make an argument go ahead.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:36 AM
1

I read the article twice and it said nothing of the sort.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:27 AM
10

So it either doesn't exist or is a false flag? Your two options are almost as fucking dumb as his.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:20 AM
1

Yup. The problem is no group wants to just leave once the issue they formed around is solved. So now they are a hammer looking for some nails.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:09 AM
3

Rights are always going to be a balancing act. Imperfect mask seal is such a minor issue especially when most people didn't even wear their masks right anyways. To ostracize an entire section of society over something so small is wrong. This rule did not appreciably increase the health of society for what it cost. Side note. It's kinda funny we are both negative karma. I don't see that often.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:27 AM
0

Your neck beard atheism aside, exactly. Telling someone to choose between what they believe is a clear right or wrong decision is not really a choice at all.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:57 PM
3

Again it doesn't have to be DIRECTED to be discriminatory. You keep saying "people with facial hair" like we have droves of dwarven goddesses rolling around with lush beards. If this was the case you would be right but it's not. You discarded the example of kinky hair bans without even understanding it. If your rule affects a great majority of one protected class over another it's discriminatory. The occasional hirsute lady does not outweigh the fact it affects every man (barring alopecia). I ag…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:12 PM
1

Her: Let's talk about dating and the colonial mindset. Me: Nope! Nope! Nope! Nope!
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:52 PM
9

The sad thing is that post is locked. To much support for men I guess.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:49 PM
4

You might want to try that sentence again.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:34 PM
7

I said almost all men because I saw you already made an appeal to the extremes in a previous comment. it affects any man that can grow a beard. The Sikhs are a separate question because they are dealing with religious discrimination rather then gendered.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:34 PM
31

Not only was this discrimination it was also dumb as hell. Protecting people is literally a part of their religion. You can't buy that kind of dedication to a job.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:27 PM
-4

Saying religion is a choice is like saying you have a choice between shitting in the kitchen or shitting in the toilet. Technically true but one is obviously right.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:21 PM
9

I'll add that there are plenty of spaces that require security that wouldn't also require masking. They could have just been assigned to those instead.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:18 PM
8

Incorrect. Public health policy SHOULD be structured in a nondiscriminatory way.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:15 PM
8

It doesn't have to be directed at a group to be discriminatory. It only has to unfairly and disproportionately affect them. This beard mandate affects almost all men and almost no women. Kind of like kinky hair bans were not directed at black people but they sure as hell were racist.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:13 PM
9

And only then if the respirator is absolutely necessary for the job.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:00 PM
17

And Sikhs get an exception to that at least in the US military.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:57 PM
1

I tried engaging with that sub. An question that isn't an easy softball is reeeee'd out of existence.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:32 PM
1

I'm all for nudism. Go be free. That's a big difference from flashing though. Flashing is a sexual act
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:13 PM
1

I don't entirely disagree. If you just want to let it hang out I have no problem with that. The human body should not be the taboo that it currently is. Flashing on the other hand is a sexual act. If you commit sexual acts on minors you should be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:08 PM
1

Much better
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:03 PM
1

Military life is slavery in general. It just depends on whether you are selling yourself or getting kidnapped.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:57 PM
3

That's such a weird take on #NotAllMen. How is defending yourself from false accusations not being respectful. Are we just supposed to respectfully let them lie on us?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:48 PM
2

Kidnapping?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:43 PM
2

You are stating your opinion based on a historical fact.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:20 PM
13

That last paragraph reminded me of r/menkampf They take shit feminists say and replace the word "men" with "jew". Let's just say feminists would fit right in with some camp directors.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 04:23 AM
1

I think "hate" is poor weird choice. I think most feminists don't hate men they are just being led be cultural propaganda into hurting men. Just look at how many feminists actually believe that DV is a male driven problem. It's really the core group of bad actors knowingly pushing these lies that are the issue.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:39 PM
4

Males can be victims and females can be abusers. Anything that makes this fact visible is promoting men's right. Hopefully some day soon the simple fact this was reported won't be considered a win.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:29 PM
1

Human right are not a zero sum game. I can believe in young peoples right to life and believe in men's rights. Also stop claiming "science". Scientifically the cycle of life starts at conception. You are against science.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:59 AM
2

Well put. Nothing wrong with calling out negative behavior.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:53 AM
1

Exactly. It's sad that it might be used to further oppress the single father but that is a separate issue. This talking point almost feels like blackmail. Let us kill babies or we will financially run you into the ground.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:46 AM
1

I feel like you are implying we are against RvW out of spite. That's not the case. I'm against that ruling in specific because it was bad law. Privacy was such a bad take when there is the whole damn FDA telling doctors what they can do. The other problem as someone that believes in the right to life saying "what about men" reads as shitty as the people saying "what about women" to Depp's win. Flawed society might punish others for a human rights win. That does not detract from the win
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:40 AM
1

While true bad actors have already built up an arsenal of talking points. I don't know if it's worth the fight to reclaim.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:26 AM
1

I mean puppies are cool. Enders Game is a great book. There is probably a good concert happening somewhere near. Yeah society kinda sucks as a whole but you can find some good things in it. Find your place and help us fight for the rest of it
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:37 AM
2

Marching your child over to apologize for bad behavior or even do yard work to pay off a broken window used to be the standard. The fact this is on the news is the issue.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:25 AM
1

That video was so disgusting. General humanity like nodding at someone that met your eye was label harassment.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:15 AM
1

I'm honestly surprised so little "self help" is used.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:11 AM
2

It made me feel bad. I mean it's no lynching but I was negatively affected by her bigotry. The more important issue is that this is just a milder expression of the same sexism that leads to things like harsher sentencing and unbalanced policing. See something say something.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:40 PM
2

Exactly. The first time I actually read the Roe v Wade opinions I was dumbfounded. Ones belief on abortion aside that was a nonsense ruling. The judges that made it should be ashamed of twisting the legal system to support their beliefs.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:00 PM
1

You want to know how we can really make women feel safe walking down the street? Stop feeding them this false narrative that men are waiting to attack them at every opportunity. This fear is a monster of your own making.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:20 PM
2

This is the answer. I walk home from work through some bad neighborhoods and I have been followed before. So I went into a gas station and chatted with the cashier for awhile until the person left. Relying on the person youre are afraid of to alleviate that fear is nonsensical. Either they are innocent and it's unfair to expect them to follow your whims or they are actually up to something and they don't give a fuck.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:18 PM
2

I'm the asshole for being a victim of sexual discrimination?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:10 PM
1

I also take walks. They are wonderfully cathartic.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:07 PM
1

I made the exact same mistake the other day. Why are those two so confusable.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:03 PM
2

You know what we should do to make women feel safe walking down the street? Stop feeding them this false narrative about men waiting to attack them at the drop of a hat.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:02 PM
2

I blame the matriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:54 PM
1

I knew a psychologist who worked in prisons trying to reduce the amount of rape. Shits a serious issue.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:52 PM
2

"The order seldom leaves enough to pay for the children’s care. He has the same strain of shopping, housekeeping, occasional sickness, etc., as a working woman with children, but, he doesn’t get the State allowances such as the woman is allowed. He gets the strong impression that he is ostracised completely and that he and his children have no rights. What he does manage to obtain is purely concessionary." This was my brother. He was raising my niece and paying child support for her at the same …
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:43 PM
9

Thats just an excuse. There are pedophiles in the NBA but it's not a pedophilic organization. Defining the men's rights movement by it's worst individuals is a shady tactic to prejudice people against it.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:37 PM
1

John McWhorter's review of the book White Fragility calls it racist by way of infantilizing and stealing agency from black people. This is much the same. Blaming everything on men disrespects the ability of women to act. If men are the beginning and the end then you must believe women are just shapeless lumps waiting for a man to give them purpose.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:27 PM
1

A part or apart. Very different meanings.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:16 AM
1

Heck of slot better then the 0% we have right now. We arnt fighting for all the support. Just some support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/22 04:40 AM
1

It should be a gender neutral opportunity but someone should stay at home with the kids. Just because single mothers can raise children and work doesn't mean it's the best outcome for the children.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:19 PM
2

It should be a gender neutral opportunity but someone should stay at home with the kids. Just because single mothers can raise children and work doesn't mean it's the best outcome for the children.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:18 PM
-3

The term incel stopped meaning involuntary celibate along time ago and you know it.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 02:37 AM
4

Why is this even on a site named a voice for men? Is it one of those bad faith wolf in sheep's clothing type sites?
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:47 PM
1

So much wrong here but the first thing I noticed was her calling out that MRA is a gendered term so it can't be egalitarian. Does she forget that Feminist is also a gendered name?
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:40 PM
4

I forget the name but the previous system was to arrest both combatants if it was a fight. If it was a clear case of an attack rather then a fight they would still just arrest the attacker. This lead to more women being arrested for fighting and attacking men and surprisingly less men being arrested because the cops actually had to slow down think about what happened to determine if it was an attack or fight. Primary aggressor laws on the other hand stipulates that you should only arrest one par…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:30 PM
1

The Duluth model is more an evolution of the primary aggressor model rather then replacement. It's basically the primary aggressor model but it can only recognize men as the aggressor. Both were created by feminists but on the bright side Ellen Pence the designer of the Duluth model disowned it after seeing it's effects of male victims. So at least she is trying. The primary aggressor model is pretty messed up as it was designed in response to an increase in female abusers getting arrested and d…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:12 PM
27

Date a girl named Princess and expec.... Well just dont
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:25 PM
1

Wow that happened awhile ago Im surprised anyone saw it much less remembered. Yeah I have opinions on the Duluth model but I didn't state a single one. All I did was ask their opinion and they came out swinging. They didn't even know most of the basic facts about it. It was super wierd to watch them fight no one about something they didn't know. All rhetoric no substance.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 10:56 PM
3

Ugh I tried participating in that sub. They were so busy trying to "win" an argument I wasn't even having that they never even tried to answer my question. Then of course when I called them on it it was all denial and blame shifting. Then I recently saw a post about taking back the conversation surrounding male abuse victims from MRAs. That sub at least is actively trying to hinder the advancement of human rights.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:27 PM
15

A blank check.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 09:00 PM
21

Just got banned from r whitepeopltwitter for mentioning Rittenhouse was on camera running away. "Defending a terrorist". Same shit we are seeing with Depp. Even after they lose their case they just double down on the lies and propaganda.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 08:53 PM
12

That sucks. The right to GTFO is pretty fundamental.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 12:11 PM
1

Propaganda in real time
/r/MensRights05/06/22 08:23 PM
20

Myth: The vast majority of abusers are men. Truth: Those statistics are based on arrest records. Given the sexists nature of the judicial system they are heavily inflated. Independent polls have found the amount of female abusers is almost equal to male ones.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 07:42 PM
19

That name alone makes me suspicious. It's a pretty common misandrist talking point that men are bad and need to be taught how to be good.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 07:27 PM
7

The Sun didn't have to prove that he was abusive. Only that they could reasonably believe he was. That is a much easier claim to defend. I guess I misunderstood your point. I thought you were saying Depp was an abuser despite the judgement here. You are right that the verdict didn't explicitly say Heard was abusive. That said from everything we heard about their relationship during this case I feel it's pretty clear she was.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:25 PM
1

Fortunately the jury is anonymous for the next year unless they come forward themselves.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:12 PM
1

I don't think he can sue the ACLU since the statute has elapsed in the six years this has been in trial.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:24 PM
5

Every thread about it is locked and any comments against serial abuser Heard are deleted.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:15 PM
1

Men are not the main drivers of IPV. This is a myth based on terrible policing and reporting of male abuse. Of course most domestic violence arrests are of males when the police are only willing to arrest males for DV. That's like saying you believe the disproportionate arrest records of black men proves they are more violent rather then it's a sign of a broken system.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:59 PM
5

Yup. The problems is our subs are judged based on the lowest commenter while they get a "no true feminist" pass.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:55 PM
4

You should read the verdict sheets the jury had to fill out. It had a section for "Are the statements Heard made false, yes or no". They could only find her liable if they found her claims of abuse false. They also had to find it malicious. There were like 5 question they had to answer "yes" to in order to find Heard liable.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:49 PM
52

Yup. A year or so back they banned a support sub for victims of child abuse. It was pretty disgusting of them.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:35 PM
27

For real. This was the biggest case ever about a male victim and false allegations and possibly a turning point for equality. Can you not make about yourself for a second.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 09:29 PM
7

I totally agree. I was just pointing out the angle the media was playing and why they could technically say it like that.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:53 PM
24

And she managed to knock that totally sincere tweet out before she even left the court building.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:50 PM
3

It's on Depp. One of the issues was whether Waldman was acting as Depp's agent. They essentially decided he said those thing on behalf of Depp and with his consent so that Depp is responsible for them.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:48 PM
2

The count she won on was a hyper specific accusation that they prepped a "crime scene". Believing she didn't do that one thing is not mutually exclusive with thinking she is a lying abuser.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:45 PM
67

Her well polished statement that came 2 minutes after she left the courtroom. Her PR team was on the ball there. It would have been hilarious if they accidentally copy pasted the prepped victory speech instead.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:41 PM
8

The next step is the lawyers arguing the logistics of the settlement. Which means that the lawyer fees might still get covered. It also means JD could wave his payout for an agreement that she just fucks off. Though she didn't care about the last NDA so I don't know if that would be smart.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:37 PM
16

It can mean that. Malice is either intent to harm or negligent recklessness. Unfortunately the jury didn't need/get to say which they believed. But yeah a news outlet saying only that is pretty shady.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:33 PM
35

It's like they think half the victims of abuse aren't people.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:12 PM
2

Punitive damages are capped at 350k. The 5m was just a statement. So 10.35m minus 2m
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/22 07:35 PM
1

First I want to thank you for being reasonable. Not all dissent in this sub is presented as respectfully. So I have a few points I would like you to consider Just because 99% of men are nice doesn't mean women can just suddenly stop being afraid. It's true they can't but that doesn't mean they get a pass to not try. My grandma was raised in the south during the 20s. We didn't give her a pass and she accepted the correction. When you behavior is pointed out to be problematic it's your responsibil…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:56 AM
6

3-0 because they would know better.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/19 02:00 AM
4

It wasnt revenge. He was teaching her the error of her ways. Think of it as a face spanking.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/15 12:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter