hego555 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Does this seem credible “[W]omen with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage had an 80% rate of subsequent divorce” in Wikipedia entry for “Female Promiscuity” Imperialism.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/07/20 04:43 PM
0	Does this seem credible “[W]omen with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage had an 80% rate of subsequent divorce” in Wikipedia entry for “Female Promiscuity” Imagine thinking brain volume is what quantifies intelligence. Was Einstein’s brain 10x the size of an average person's brain	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/07/20 01:06 PM
2	What's your n-count? It’s almost like this subreddit doesn’t represent everyone	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/05/19 01:31 PM
3	Does the 80/20 rule apply to the percentage of men or women you would want to marry? most women Most people	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/04/19 12:54 PM
1	Men and women can never be held to the same standards regarding n-count.. nor should they be. But being easily accessible for a non reproductive reason is irrelevant to any evolutionary rational. So, while I don’t particularly like the idea of high n-count in male or female. I don’t see how it lowers anyone’s value unless there is something besides the n-count at play. And all these theories people have are just that. Theories	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/04/19 08:13 PM
1	Men and women can never be held to the same standards regarding n-count.. nor should they be. Ya but your talking about reproductive value. Health weight height etc. are all going to be relevant even if the sex is for pleasure rather than breeding. That’s just how we are. So saying a woman’s value is hurt by casual sex is just a bullshit, in my opinion, way of rationalizing not liking the idea of a woman with a high body count. Which is fine, but it’s hypocritical to say men are exempt from slut shaming because of some (*insert some evolutionary rational)	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/04/19 10:49 AM
1	Men and women can never be held to the same standards regarding n-count.. nor should they be. Your argument would be sound if not for the fact that we are sentient. We can modify our behavior. Someone who would have been selective prior to contraceptives doesn’t have to be selective because it doesn’t matter.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/04/19 02:49 PM
8	If the boy in this article was your son, how would you handle this? Our society runs on the premise of letting 10 guilty people go rather than imprisoning 1 innocent person. Doesn’t mean disregard sexual assault, but the premise that a girl would never lie is unfair	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/10/18 12:18 PM