TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

heldonhammer Archive

View 1 post and 180 comments by heldonhammer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

heldonhammer/r/MensRights20/10/16 11:31 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

The chances of her not going to jail disappeared the moment she began attacking the cop.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:49 PM
1

Process found to be illegal under state court. Likely to be used as an informing decicion in other states.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:59 PM
2

No chance? Want to bet on that? There will be a push given the publicity of this case since Higgins went to the media. Why else would she be complaining about this to the media if she didn't want this to be changed?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 11:55 AM
3

Long standing criminal behavior stopped by counsel govenment. ​ There i fixed your headline.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:56 PM
2

His lawyers say...after the verdict. No the jury said the article was about him
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:24 PM
1

Shadow of a doubt though isn't the legal standard, perponderance of evidence is in civil cases. Which means his lawyers failed to prove it is more likely than not
/r/MensRights01/06/22 09:20 PM
55

You say that, but the Supreme Court of the state of Connecticut says otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 08:10 PM
4

Drop the rope, don't engage, just ignore her. People like this just want to argue, and brow beat. They can't make you engage.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 12:47 AM
14

No he will win because judges don't like being ignored
/r/MensRights29/06/21 12:33 AM
8

The article is just a reddit post done over.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 02:28 PM
2

From what I have read on cursory google searches is that initially the husband will be on the hook but can file paperwork stating the kid isn't his. Still sucks though.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 02:08 PM
8

All I can think of is that poor husband. Depending on how the law is in England he can be on the hook for this child. In some states in the US for example DNA doesnt matter. If you are married and the spouse has a kid- it's yours unless you go to court. Quickly. So now this guy's wife raped a 13 year old and he may be facing the choice of paying for this kid for life or putting it on the victim.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 06:45 AM
1

it does. What a good number of women don't do is just live with the next guy until alimony runs out.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/20 08:50 PM
8

Because it is Canada and she was a minor at the time
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 08:26 PM
28

This is a problem with society. People are never at fault for their own actions. Someone else was a bad influence.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 06:47 PM
43

She sure tried. Yea he is a toxic influence and I cut him out of my life. Which is hard and still following custody laws.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 06:12 PM
1319

Ah yes. Somehow the father of her child is blamed partially for her actions. As well as a some other friend. Yup blame others and request early release. I have no idea why the judge wouldn't let this girl go. Weird?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 01:37 PM
2

Sounds exactly like my ex.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 07:50 PM
5

While I agree with you, a judge must go with what has been proven in court. Not what can be presumed.
/r/PussyPass22/08/20 01:32 AM
19

Ding ding ding. We have a winner. They commited fraud, got off and will likely serve in a minimum security facility.
/r/PussyPass21/08/20 11:44 PM
8

I read somewhere that he took the photos that were used to dupe the university. So they proved he actively participated in the fraud. Which in my opinion is more than enough explanation for the difference in the sentence.
/r/PussyPass21/08/20 11:43 PM
1

Of course not, but I am attempting to assist you in conveying the message you intend.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/20 11:27 PM
0

You cannot have massive parity. Parity means the same. Massive sameness? What you mean is disparity.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/20 05:47 PM
28

Aka victim blaming.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 01:22 PM
1

The article mentioned first that there was a fence dispute. So there was a property dispute. Plus she went on TV to disparage the plaintiff which is probably where the large price for defamation is coming from.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/20 02:23 PM
3

They did it in an attempt to curb hate speech, well a bit too late. TD had gone elsewhere. So instead of stopping it, they just lost control over it. Also with the seemingly coordinated hit on reddit and twitch, will fuel conspiracy theories.
/r/MGTOW230/06/20 06:26 AM
2

Except your wrong. Masks have been proven to decrease the amount of germs one SPREADS. It's not about protecting the mask wearer. It is about protecting the group. Experiments have shown the decrease is around 90%.
/r/PussyPass29/06/20 08:17 PM
5

Guard, therapist, administration, food worker, tale your pick.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/20 08:23 PM
26

And then her response of how dare you hit me. So he put her down.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 04:08 AM
115

You tell 50% of potential customers to pound sand and you tell the other 50% that their husbands, sons, fathers, nephews brothers and male cousins are garbage and its a shock you can find any customers for the business.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/20 04:50 AM
28

If she is in the movie I for one will not be seeing it.
/r/PussyPass14/05/20 12:26 AM
1

I want things to go back to normal so people give me money. But her only thought is entertainment. The fact she cant fathom another industry speaks volumes on how she views herself.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 06:30 PM
12

As they are married he should have known better that his wife has every right to receive proper payments or real estate or other assets. He has enough money by the way. No one has the right in a divorce to take out $5 million out of a joint account without court approval. To claim otherwise is asinine.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/20 09:16 PM
13

Well drinking doesn't allow you to interfere in an arrest. It definitly doesn't allow you to assault anyone. Mich less a cop.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/20 03:59 PM
-5

Nice
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/20 03:57 PM
15

From The men's leagues mostly.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:53 AM
8

Why do people watch minor league hockey? College or high school sports? Little league world series? Surely anyone can play as well as little leagues right? Its because there is something about competition that humans enjoy. ​ Billions watch sports worldwide? Why ? because they enjoy it. Additional benefits- learn new tactics, learn ways to practice and improve.
/r/PussyPass24/04/20 05:13 PM
3

Your reading comprehension is abysmal. I stated the guy has to be found not guilty. The only person who has no idea what I'm talking about is you. Because your statement in no way contradicts anything I said but yet yet here you are putting me on blast? There is certainly a moron here. But it does not appear to be me. And yes. Courts can sometimes be called to declare innocence. Usually when a conviction has already occurred. Since its topical to the discussion on false accusations I will provid…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 10:59 AM
232

It's extremely rare women get CAUGHT. There is no way to prove how many get away with it. So of course it is "extremely rare" as first men have to be found not guilty, then they have to PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that the woman was maliciously lying. That is a high bar of evidence that even if it were common would make it look very rare.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 07:22 PM
59

No, no NO! You don't get to blame the dude because he mocked her for being so upset. It's a game, you win, you lose. It doesn't justify her assaulting him. Non threatening words are never an excuse to assault people.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 01:00 PM
4

Probably what they could PROVE.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 04:33 PM
1

When they established that they would hit the girls. What was that girl thinking walking right up to the one kid?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/20 05:01 PM
2

Reading their controversies section. This company is a complete piece of shit.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:36 PM
2

So, lie to the police and you get a fine if they don't buy it but if they do then the real victims life is ruined and potentially faces decades of prison time and a ruined future because you lied. Your right, that is a little offense. I didn't say lying to police but especially lying to police with the intent to harm another person. Also your attempt to appeal to authority without any citations is a bad argument. Simply "I study criminology and penology" is a bad argument. Give some citations, e…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:14 AM
6

Which is why a false claim is not an unverified claim. A false claim is one that is proven to be unsubstantiated by any evidence. It is better that 100 guilty people go free than 1 innocent person hang. The criminal justice system is designed to defend the rights of the accused. In these types of cases too often those rights are ignored. If it allows the guilty to go free. Well so be it.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:42 PM
10

No prison. Lying to police and perverting justice is a serious crime. It has serious lifetime repercussions to victims of the crime and to society writ large. Outside of the wrongfully accused themselves it takes resources away from real victims, takes resources away from investigation of real crimes. It also hurts the chances real victims get real justice by hurting their credibility. When you add the societal damage that this crime alone their should be sone jail time. But the real punishment …
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:35 PM
12

False!=unverified.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:28 PM
2

They intervened as the conflict reached a point where both sides could be reasoned with. Given the fact that the ones instigating it had been eliminated it was a good time to diffuse.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/20 04:11 PM
8

You know, the electrical grid would collapse, trash would build up, oil production would all but cease, shipping would stop, sea food would stop being a thing,there would be few firefighters, especially those that fight wildfires, and there would be a massive need to teach welding or the existing infrastructure would collapse soon. But you know...evil men would be gone.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:34 PM
10

What?
/r/MensRights30/12/19 06:14 PM
5

In what world is all men cannot feel trauma not hateful?
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:47 PM
70

Complains when getting lenient AF sentence. No, this poor poor woman should only do 2.5 years for 4 counts of rape? How can the lawyer even try to justify that statement?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/19 02:09 PM
34

Yeah I was fucking blown away. I don't disbelieve it outright. But I'm definitely skeptical. DNA test proves it, so what is there to be skeptical about?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 12:10 AM
-1

How is this excessive. He put her on the ground and cuffed her. No strikes thrown. No attempts at bodily harm.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/19 11:46 AM
7

Both the assailant and the girl need serious jail time.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 01:33 AM
1

A whiffle bat?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 11:04 PM
2

Pretty sure such pricing schemes are illegal in the UK.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 04:31 PM
2

Love the part where to diffuse the situation he left the room and took a bath they use the phrase "he neglected her and took a bath". Talk about victim blaming.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:40 PM
2

She was pressured from others to do the thing so it's not her fault... Jesus, What is wrong with these people?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 12:56 PM
20

Do you have any basis for your estimate? Like figures, data points? Otherwise your opinion is just blowing smoke.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 12:18 PM
1

Except a lot of these people only care if women are disadvantaged. That is MY problem with them
/r/MensRights13/01/19 11:51 AM
3

I love how the response is " I feel pretty strongly that having one or two things that are special to woman aren’t going to threaten any great power structure at Oxford." When you know if there was a single men's only thing at Oxford these same people would lose their shit.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 12:28 AM
2

The consequence would be automatic withdrawal of federal funding. Most school districts that would be very, very painful.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 05:51 PM
2

So rewrite the rule to be gender neutral. The judge clearly stated the rule as currently constituted is not gender neutral.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:47 PM
4

You are aware that rules can be discriminatory without being designed to be so?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:57 PM
1

Easy fix is the teams give automatic difference, when cuts are necessary, to those kids in the grade the team is designated for.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:56 PM
1

Or just allow everyone to play for different grades but give automatic difference, with regards to cuts, for those in the grade of the team.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:52 PM
1

Who is the judge going to put in jail? The school board members. Also, if they are not in compliance with Title IX then they lose federal monies which is a death sentence to most school districts.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:51 PM
246

Unwanted touching of a sexual nature, is that not sexual assault, not harassment?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:50 PM
7

As they say in the military, trust- but verify.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 11:50 PM
0

If only we had a system to identify, using evidence, the veracity of a claim of guilt or innocence...
/r/MensRights29/09/18 11:50 PM
3

Failed to legalize abortion despite feminist protests. So people think their side protests so everyone else should fall in line. It shows a very high level of entitlement by the author.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:48 PM
1

If the myth that women don't lie about rape gets squashed by enough prosecutions of false accusers then those found not guilty will probably be treated more fairly.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:50 PM
1

Having worked in law enforcement for over a decade, I would be fired from my department immediately for attempting to contact the employers of those found not guilty accusing them of crimes.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:45 PM
1

Except these aren't average citizens. A police officers actions could be construed a no. Judicial punishment. They will more than likely be destroyed in court.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:11 PM
15

Except that is illegal, unless you can prove it it is slander. A not guilty verdict makes it pretty open and shut.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:51 PM
1

How can anyone assume this is not intentional?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:44 PM
12

The trial has not happened yet
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:40 PM
1

Your probably not wrong.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:53 PM
1

I'm more of referencing my experiences when people believe renting a pavilion means they rent the park.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:42 PM
71

My favorite is the end, where she states I know I can't do this legally, but is there another way I can get what I feel like I should be able to have, fucking anyone else's rights while still feeling morally superior?
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:25 PM
56

The only thing in a public park you are ENTITLED to is access to the park, nothing more, nothing less. Its just as bad as people who have family gatherings at a park trying to kick others out. Sorry, not sorry.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:22 PM
75

That would require this person to be intellectually honest with people, little chance of that.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:21 PM
3

cannot feel remorse? How broken do you have to be to believe HALF of the worlds population cannot feel remorse or generosity. All of those male aid workers abroad? Male members of Doctors without boarders? Nope! What a joke.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:23 PM
11

It hurts me that controversial has now become an advertising slogan. These people deride Trump for being controversial then celebrate themselves for being such. The lack of self awareness is staggering.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:03 PM
33

But...but The PATRIARCY!!!! RAPE CULTURE!!!!MEH FEELINGS!!!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:34 PM
37

except it was the school district that won the money, not him
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:32 PM
1

Not without a large bar in accordance to the SCOTUS
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:39 PM
1

Except its the case where the 19 year old raped the 14 year old. The definition of loss of consent due to alcohol consumption is a murkey one at best. But the 19 year old woman had sex with a 14 year old boy. This is an illegal act, and if the genders had been flipped no one would be defending the 19 year old. So why are you now?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:34 PM
2

legally, a 14 year old, in the jurisdiction that the crime happened in, cannot consent to sex. How is this a complecated issue?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:09 PM
1

Except, rape is the word we have for having sex with someone who cannot consent, and legally a 14 year old in the jurisdiction this takes place in is unable to consent. Therefore, it is rape.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 02:12 AM
10

The linked article shows 0 uses of The world Dunkirk from my use of the find on this page feature...
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:14 PM
2

They had me up until the phrase the snowflake generation. Youd think people mocking others for sweeping false generalizations would avoid making one.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:54 PM
1

Talk about an extra kick in the kidneys.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 02:55 AM
1

Probably, but the girl probably doesn't have much in the way of assets to go after, so a jury probably wouldn't find in his favor for much.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 02:55 AM
12

The state may have a restitution law in place as well, in which case that amount could be on top of what he will get from the state. Plus it is a small enough amount that it might actually be collectable.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 03:34 PM
24

I love her attempts at playing the victim. I was in a prison in my own mind? Please. You didn't want to stand up to your mother so you put a man away instead. Then you try and play the victim?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 03:32 PM
1

Well, even more technically dinosaurs never died out- avian dinosaurs are all around us, aka birds.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 02:39 AM
1

Key word being primary, but I agree, it's not a good post for this sub.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 10:47 PM
9

Why not both?
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:13 PM
2

It's just a flaw in the system, that's all
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:54 PM
-5

Funny thing, there is no evidence that proves that fingerprints are unique to individuals. It can be used to prove someone didn't do it, and imply they probably did it. Also, you can't tell the difference between a Koala and a human fingerprint.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:32 PM
5

Well she was wrong, what I want to see is a photo of the actual assailant and the falsely accused
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:16 PM
2

So your an uneducated anarchist. You don't want a system that you don't know what it does. Nice.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:04 PM
4

Yes, or they poisoned the well by giving her the wrong kind of line up. Sequential lineups are far more accurate than a spread line up.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:44 PM
10

Being wrong
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:39 PM
3

That's because policy for policing is usually a state or local jurisdiction to define. But sure everything should be dictated by the feds.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:39 PM
2

You have zero experience working in a police department.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:38 PM
8

If your not sure, say your not sure. Or say he looks like the person who attacked you not, he did it.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:37 PM
28

Well, if you look at it in the way that they assumed to woman is always right and the man is always wrong, then it's not. With all of the talk of "don't blame the victim" and the mentality of all those accused are guilty this article points out the flaws in that line of thinking put forth by mainline feminism. But your right, the article itself doesn't bring up those issues at all.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:32 PM
369

Not her fault, my ass. She testified that a man who did not commit the crime, did in fact commit the crime. If your not sure, don't blame some guy who looks similar. Also, the judge should be disbarred for disallowing the evidence of his innocence.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 01:27 PM
7

Unless of course, one partyear was withholding information/assets. Not in this case, but I hope your opinion isn't as sweeping as it reads.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:07 PM
15

which is why i dont donate to UNICEF
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:49 PM
3

I think that it's telling that they don't have a position on the integration of sororities. It's the mote and beam thing. It's a part of human nature to see the flaws in others and not in yourself. And it's toxic.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 01:05 PM
1

I was posting it to show that it was on yahoos homepage. It was the first time I had seen it. I have since noticed the link posted elsewhere on a sub I don't subscribe to.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:58 PM
3

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
/r/MensRights20/10/16 11:17 AM
0

Except I notice 1 factual inaccuracy in the article- "There isn't a big demand for school teachers" Actually, there is. In fact there is a LOT more school teachers than engineers. The reason they are paid less, if applying supply and demand theory, is there is a larger amount of supply compared to the demand. There is a ton more teachers.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 09:40 PM
2

You don't have children, do you?
/r/MensRights25/09/16 12:16 AM
3

No what is going to happen is she is going to threaten the wrong person, and then get arrested for verbal assault/disturbing the peace/disorderly conduct.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 12:16 AM
1

As for the title, this proves that A girl is pushing for sex too, not girls. This is an anecdote, not proof of anything. But that said, equality means equal. If there isn't equal punishment, then there isn't equality.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:21 PM
1

Classic shotgun technique, ask questions but don't listen to the answers. Simply try and find a question the person can't articulate an answer to your liking then declare that you are right and it's not worth the effort and walk off. You cannot have an honest discussion with people who are like that.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:02 AM
1

I was summing up the previous statements, not disagreeing with them.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:51 PM
0

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:05 PM
2

No evidence of assault, revictimized ...I'm glad the judge didn't buy it.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:29 PM
7

A simple fact due to the fact that women tend not to work in the dangerous professions, so their chances of dying decreases. Which causes each murder that occurs to sky the numbers as a percentage. Simple statistics, why do people fail at it so bad? Oh right, the 3 types of facts/falsehoods- lies, damned lies, and statistics.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:10 PM
1

How does the judge who signed this Warrent still have a job?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:31 AM
16

The legal concern is, due to their authority position over the child, they cannot give honest concent.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 12:43 PM
32

But they are teachers, so.... what is your point?
/r/MensRights23/08/15 12:41 PM
6

Psychopath have urges to do bad things, sociopaths don't feel emotions.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:24 PM
10

Not psychopath, sociopath.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:56 PM
3

Nope it's in print, so it's libel. J Jonah Jamesen.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:20 PM
5

Thanks JJ!
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:16 PM
5

I think the real reason was she was late and entitled, but the HR lerson went with the nicer reasons...
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:00 PM
9

Unless the recruiter was trying to help ber out, talk about biting the hand that feeds you.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:58 PM
16

Sufficient doesn't make you the best candidate. Someone else interviewed better.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:57 PM
5

Absolutely. You were at best a marginal candidate, add this to being late...your done.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:54 PM
1

Not in the state of Michigan they cant. That age is 16. So yea, there should be charges.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:59 PM
3

Or claims that is the guy that raped her, don't forget the great possibility of misidentification.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:47 AM
4

Just about any well landed punch has the chance of causing a hairline fracture of the jaw (thus a broken jaw). It's not that difficult to do. But also- if you touch my kid your gonna get hurt. Why is it that when a mother does something like this you hear things like "don't mess with a momma bear" and when a father does this its "don't hit women, ever"?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:12 PM
3

I dont know why you're being upvoted for being a PC drone This is why I upvoted him- because not all people who are closed minded about this issue, to the same extent this lady was, are female. So a more accurate statement (to include all close minded idiots) is people, not women as you originally stated.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:16 PM
-3

redacting* FTFY
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:03 PM
10

before or after the wrongful arrest lawsuit?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 02:29 PM
2

But wouldn't she have broken the contract, marriage is a promise to REMAIN faithful someone, so she wasn't keeping the first part of it. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:01 AM
0

To be fair, he should have seen it coming.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:36 AM
1

this is also true. Salt was the principal export when Timbuktu was a major trading hub source
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:58 AM
1

problem with those studies is it "does it happen to boys more" or "more men willing to admit it happened to them than woman"?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:06 PM
1

considering the word Salary derives from the word Sal (salt in Latin) I would say your not wrong, just old, or was this in Soviet Union?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:04 PM
2

1 was not disputed because she didn't stick around long enough for him to counter her claims. 2 Your right on that count 3 correct again 4 woman never paid something she was never requested for, I wouldn't be so sure, if their was a court order before (when the child was living with the mother) ordering child support their is probably one on file. More than likely it was issued as a percentage of her wages (20% of 0 is 0 and all that). and ultimately a good arbiter will first state what should h…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:58 AM
1

She storms out because she didn't like hearing thing contradictory to what she wanted. Your right, Judy was saying what she should have done, not what was her legal obligations. She probably would have won, sadly, due to the actual case in front of the "court" at the time.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:47 AM
1

I would reccomend a Muay Thai class, it will work with what you already know.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 10:24 PM
1

The problem is is that it can indicate guilt, but not innocence. So its not a true test.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 10:23 PM
1

a brown belt in what? And yes, numbers are hard to overcome, no matter how much training you have. But you can at least take one or two of those bastards down with you.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:05 PM
1

well if you are looking for a good place to start feel free to message me, with a few questions about your height, weight and build I should be able to point you in the direction of an art that can get you started. In my experience no one martial art applies to every situation.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:05 PM
2

My favourite thing to do is ask people who cite these facts what there source is. Funny thing, there is none. Its citing, a citation, that doesn't cite anything in particular. I read an article about it the other day, I'll see if I can find it again. *edit that was quick source
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:00 PM
2

WikipediaIn 2007, polygraph testimony was admitted by stipulation in 19 states, Which implies that it is not admitted in 31 states.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:00 PM
2

Oh the lawsuit that this one will have. Her family, she was a minor at the time so they would be on the hook civilly for any acts of slander that she committed, plus the police, the judge, the state for false imprisonment. And every paper that labelled him a rapist.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:52 PM
1

This is why I study martial arts, preferably something more practical like Krav Maga or BJJ
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:27 PM
2

too bad in most courts this is not considered evidence.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:26 PM
2

sad but true
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:22 PM
1

then how do people get away with security cameras?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:21 PM
0

start a blog, now its protected under freedom of the press.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:20 PM
5

or take a pic with your phone during the act, if she goes to the police bada bing. some form of evidence.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:20 PM
10

Its also usually a matter of who goes to the police first, they will tend to trust the first story they hear. But for the love of God lawyer up first.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:19 PM
2

no she can't. Call the FBI, they investigate crimes of extortion, tell them you are being extorted. Show up for the transaction and get it on video tape preferably her saying if you don't give her the money she is going to the cops. Bada bing she goes to jail for ~10 years for extortion.. edit *How to get her to say she's going to the police during the transaction is say you've changed your mind and start to walk away, she will probably go crazy and start spewing forth the treats.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:16 PM
1

Good luck proving that she did not believe these things at the time. But, seriously, why was a paternity test not issued in the previous case?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:43 PM
3

My favourite was her stating that she doesn't even know if the man and the woman know if it was rape or not. Because "its a slippery word". It is a legally defined term, is it not? Secondly, her blatant disregard for the rights of the accused.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:41 PM
2

There are laws allowing gun ownership in the following countries (not a comprehensive list but you get the idea). Australia, Brazil, Canada, Austria, Cyprus, Czech Repubic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Japan. Source Might I ask which of the "most developed countries" are you speaking of? I also understand the point you are trying to make is in reference to CCW type situation, but to own a gun for self protection d…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:26 PM
2

and that is a major distinction in such studies. good work to poin that out
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:06 PM
1

basically the Appeals court told them to reword their appeal and try again.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:59 PM
2

true story
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:57 PM
1

he was obviously trying to kill the cop, right? Remember no one suspects the Spanish Inquisition, er... I mean the police.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:56 PM
2

Minimum requirement for arrest-a probable cause that a crime has been or was about to be committed and b) probable cause that the individual was the one who committed/was about to commit said crime. What did the police state was their point to contact the person? Much less arrest the person. If this young man loses this case in the Supreme Court, his lawyers are idiots.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:55 PM
1

Actually this will probably be overturned due to the Supreme Court precident that states that you can resist an illegal arrest to the point of killing the police officer Plummer v. State, and John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. A nice cite explaining this point here
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:52 PM
1

who brought up title 9? That monstrosity has nothing to do with the case at hand.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:51 PM
4

Can the New York Times be prosecuted for encouraging illegal activity? They are encouraging kidnapping, not to mention contempt of court.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:40 PM
3

Except in the state of New York, where there is a law against it. Same as in Nevada, I don't know about other states.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:34 PM
4

So you are saying that you should be able to put up a "No blacks allowed" sign on your gym? Or more to the point "blacks pay extra"? No, it is immoral, and in the state of New York, illegal.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:32 PM
6

That is federal law, but in New York State, it is illegal under state law.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:29 PM
1

I wasn't commenting on the article, but how people reject any information that doesn't match their paradigm. How is that an interpretation of what the author's said?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:15 PM
34

This is life. Equality is only a buzzword, and anything that challenges people's paradim is sinply rejected. Just ask Copernicus, people don't care what the data says if it doesn't fit what they want it to say.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter