| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | women in their 20s who work full time now earn more than men of the same age: Britain’s Office for National Statistics.Sorry, my mistake. I wasn't so much complaining about the glass ceiling, as correcting the article. I stick with my main point though, 1.7% is nothing. It is well within the realm of normal variance, and doesn't actually indicate any bias. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/10 05:40 AM |
| 2 | women in their 20s who work full time now earn more than men of the same age: Britain’s Office for National Statistics.Because I care about yours. This article doesn't show anything, though. 1.7% should be well within normal variance and doesn't show a bias eitherway. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/10 07:20 PM |
| -4 | women in their 20s who work full time now earn more than men of the same age: Britain’s Office for National Statistics.I'm sorry, but 1.7% is nothing. In my industry I'm still expected to earn at least 15% less. And do you know what? That isn't even what the glass ceiling is. The glass ceiling means that once I have children, I will likely never be promoted afterwards because I'm expected to stay home with my children. Complain all you want, but this article is stating a difference of just over 1000 pounds when looking at a 60,000 pound salary. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/10 06:27 PM |
| 3 | 'Sex by Surprise' is sex without a condom. Not Rape.Agreed ... except, what exactly is that law? | /r/MensRights | 08/12/10 10:20 PM |
| 9 | 'Sex by Surprise' is sex without a condom. Not Rape.If the article was true, then it was rape when she said stop. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/10 09:47 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter