TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

helleborus Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by helleborus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Was the "original" the one where the girl committed suicide after the police told her to marry her attacker or the one where the girl died from her injuries? At any rate, it wasn't this one.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:27 AM
4

A point.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 06:25 AM
1

Why not? There's so many other things that interest me so much more. the only 'credential' most women's studies professors seem to have is the willingness to ascribe to malice in men what is better ascribed to either ignorance or convention. There's one damn good reason not to try to study it formally! If that's really what it's like, I'd drop that course fast.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 09:35 PM
2

The question here is why white women didn't invent new musical genres. The usual answer is that they were oppressed. That question is way beyond the scope of what I attempted to address - which was the claim that black men created blues. I tried to refute that by offering some examples of black female innovators. Oppression and disenfranchisement are not topics that I would feel comfortable speculating on. I have never studied them - either informally or in school so I'm not really qualified to …
/r/MensRights17/08/11 08:42 PM
2

So black women were less oppressed then white women? The topic was the blues which, in its early days, was pretty much exclusively a black genre. White women did not come into that discussion so I didn't mention them at all - nor did I make that claim.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 06:23 PM
-2

All those female pianists entertained their families and their dinner guests but did not seem motivated to create anything new. Piano playing was considered a genteel accomplishment for girls - much like needle work. The real purpose was to qualify women for the only respectable career open to them - being a wife. They entertained guests with songs they already knew and loved. It would have seemed daring for them to play a new song from a well known composer. I can't see that they would have had…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:54 PM
0

I'll even help you out with a link. This is just one one of many times when I called the girls out for insulting the menfolk. I don't like it whichever side it comes from.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 04:56 PM
1

to lash out passive aggressively against the 50% of the population that you genuinely hate Look at my comment history from the last week and see me lashing out passive aggressively at 2XC for blatant misandry and then revise your theory. I would actually like to see you guys succeed. The status quo is messed up. I just don't see it happening when you're all about hate, hate, hate, gotcha, gotcha, gotcha. You're just driving men away with that shit. I'm not hoping that more men will become disint…
/r/MensRights01/01/11 04:51 PM
0

So if we stop fighting and even talking about how laws and culture are sexist, things will change? That's the thing - you're not fighting, you're just talking. The US government is like 80% male. You could really get things done if you got out of your little echo chamber and really did fight. But bitching on the internet with a small number of like minded individuals is so easy and so satisfying. I would really like to see the inequities that are suffered by men change. I think they hurt everyon…
/r/MensRights30/12/10 03:53 PM
1

Of course you don't believe in anything you say. Thanks for outing yourself as a troll. Finding you gentlemen entertaining and not having a dog in this fight does not mean that I don't believe what I say. I'm just not going to get all emotionally involved in debating a tiny segment of the population that will never be seen as anything but crazy by the majority of people - unless you smarten up, stop hating on/blaming women so much and stop manufacturing outrage on a daily (hourly) basis. If y'al…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 06:58 PM
-2

You poor, sad little person. Yeah, not really. This is just entertainment to me.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 10:01 PM
-4

who downvoted this post? I downvoted it because I think it's nonsense. I bet less women get away with ruining a man's life with a false rape accusation than men get away with actually raping someone. Cops are pretty good at spotting bullshit. The cases that do occur are so sensationalized that some of you think you're in danger every time you walk out your door, when in reality, it's very rare. The divorces I've seen in my life have been equitable with both partners satisfied with the outcome. E…
/r/MensRights27/12/10 09:13 PM
3

Did you or did you not claim in your original post that, through use of sarcasm, the existence and marketing of Cialis and Viagra are proof of the existence of male empowerment? Proving that male sexuality is not demonized in our culture is not the same as claiming proof of male empowerment. So, not - I did not claim that.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 03:15 PM
5

Clearly you are incapable of arguing the point, which is why you're retreating like a haughty, intellectual coward. Because you're insisting that I tried to make points that I didn't even touch upon. I'm not afraid - I'm just not interested.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 01:46 AM
2

the premises you posited (viagra/cialis = male empowerment Since I never posited that, I'm not going to bother arguing the point. You are one of those people who could find definitive of anything in anything. You could prove that up is down, left is right, etc - just because you say so. I'm not going to waste the energy having a discussion with you.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 12:38 AM
1

How did this get to the top of the Reddit front page with only 32 upvotes? Do you have Mens Rights frontpaged? If not, it's weird.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 10:37 PM
1

I don't know how practical this might be, but maybe we should make standard consent forms available on college campuses. At the dorms whatever. It would be as easy as picking it up and asking the girl to get a pen. And it would be invalidated as soon as it was determined that the parties involved were drunk.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 10:36 PM
10

as soon as they have what they want, the sex stops. It happens in all cultures - and in virtually all women. This is such bullshit, I don't know why I'm bothering to respond. WE LIKE SEX. I like sex, my sister likes sex, my friends like sex. One of the MAIN benefits of a long term relationship is having someone to have sex with. If you're consorting with whores, then yeah - what you said is true. Try a decent woman with good intentions - you'll be amazed at the difference. I know women who have …
/r/MensRights22/12/10 09:29 PM
30

Wow! So much hate on one page. We can tell how much male sexuality is demonized by the nonstop viagra/cialis ads on prime time tv. They really have it out for men who want to have sex! This one completely false statement is enough to discredit the whole shebang: "make us fight wars for elitists who sees us only as cannon fodder in the name of protecting women". Anyone who thinks that wars are about protecting women and not about protecting profits is seriously gullible. Today, women only engage …
/r/MensRights22/12/10 08:33 PM
5

Ah. So if women behave badly, it's the womens fault. If men behave badly it's the womens fault. Glad we got that cleared up!
/r/MensRights21/12/10 09:41 PM
2

I'm not obligated to tell a girl I just started dating that I had a vasectomy and am sterile. There is no adversarial spirit that I am going into a relationship with, I am simply not disclosing irrelevant information. When I am in a relationship, I get to know the person. Any major life decision is part of that process. I find it very hard to believe that you withhold this information with no agenda. I will go so far as to state definitively that this is not true. This is reinforced by you sayin…
/r/MensRights17/12/10 07:45 PM
2

He never said he entered relationships in that spirit, I think you're being overly presumptuous. The part of his comment that I quoted showed that quite clearly. As for the 'childish games'... well, I'm fairly certain both sexes are guilty of that, even in stable relationships. Some people in both sexes, sure. But I'm not complaining about men in general - I'm complaining about the piece of shit little brat that I responded to.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 04:54 PM
1

then a man should also get to freely choose how his body (and labor, time, efforts, and therefore money) is used. He can. It's called a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 03:44 PM
8

its tons of fun when girls don't know you are sterile and call you up worried about their late period and you pretend to be worried but know all along it's probably just case they aren't feeling well or are sick that they are late or something. This is utterly revolting. To enter into a relationship in an adversarial spirit, playing childish "gotcha" games ... well, any decent, honest, well intentioned woman will spot that from a mile away. Like water seeking its own level, you will wind up with…
/r/MensRights16/12/10 03:43 PM
1

Well I can think of a reason or two why people will downvote this comment. I'm sure you can think of plenty. I'm guessing the main reason you would actually be downvoted is that you gave any credence whatsoever to this article to begin with.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 06:48 PM
-2

Yeah, I've spent the last half hour in this subreddit and now see that it's more an issue about a vocal minority than the fact that this is a pervasive view. Spend more time. It is a pervasive view.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 05:25 PM
3

Calvary Cavalry. Calvary is a cemetery.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 12:24 AM
6

feel free to get your woman hate on and the conspiracy theories flying. Wait ... you claim that all women with blogs write instructions for getting back at men, but I'm the conspiracy theorist? And I don't hate women - I am one and most of my friends are women. I was actually defending women from your spurious charge that we're all about revenge against the menfolk. I have no opinion about this Assange thing - I just don't have enough information to form one - and neither do you.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 06:16 PM
4

what woman who owns a blog hasn't written about getting back at men? Um .... most of them? This is not "par for the course". It's actually pretty extreme behavior.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 05:07 PM
10

Is it like telling your partner that you're on the Pill when you've stopped taking it because you've decided you want a baby, and have maybe even convinced yourself that he'll be thrilled once you've told him that you're pregnant? How is this relevant to this case? Because some women do fucked up shit, this guy should get a pass for doing fucked up shit? (If he did, that is. I have no idea what the facts in this case are - and neither do you.)
/r/MensRights03/12/10 03:11 PM
4

we need to start treating women like the children they are Even on Reddit, I seldom come across people as childish as you. Being in a state of tantrum is your baseline. It's downright hilarious that you think you are qualified to pass judgment on the maturity of others. we will have a civil war and we will pave the roads with the skulls of feminist males. Yeah, all 1500 of the radical MRA's who are the same page as you are really going to shake things up. The rest of us are downright terrified!
/r/MensRights02/12/10 09:59 PM
2

I was referring to those who have suggested that there should be some sort of enforcement of what links can be in the sidebars. Ah, gotcha - I thought you were responding to the headline. Thanks for setting me straight.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 01:26 AM
1

I don't think it's ok to demand people stop linking to a page on the internet. If by "demand", you mean bring to your attention and suggest in the mildest possible manner...yeah, I guess.
/r/MensRights28/11/10 11:26 PM
1

I think he was making the point that no one is winning. I doubt that. Were you just trying to be intentionally divisive and antagonistic? That would be responding in kind in this case.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 03:37 PM
5

If I had to choose between a soulless pale, shell of a dad or a mom who has a sense of morality and won't tell me that "anything goes" since there is no such thing as "universal morality" - I would choose the mom. Yeah - because you can't be a moral/ethical person without believing in an omnipotent sky fairy. Most of the crap that's wrong with the world today is directly attributable to religious beliefs. More correctly it's greedy, smart people influencing the credible cretins who "believe" tha…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 03:43 PM
3

That's why there is a very low birth rate in Western Countries That would be birth control and high socio-economic status, but enjoy the fantasy that you're "winning" if you like.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 10:10 PM
1

freep.com Detroit Free Press, a paper of record in Michigan, which assigns all of these "family" type matters to "Moms Like Me" in which fathers generally aren't encouraged to participate, and don't. Ah. Really no way to know that from the post. Have you approached them about starting a Dads Like Me group? Maybe it's not entirely malicious and they just don't realize that the interest is there.
/r/MensRights20/11/10 01:55 AM
2

I upboat you a million times if i could. Well, I guess they don't call you the village idiot for nothing. Wanting to "upboat" a statement that makes a claim that is against all the evidence gives it some validity.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 05:19 PM
2

you are the reason men die younger! That is an interesting position since married men live significantly longer than single, divorced or widowed men.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 05:17 PM
5

Where did you get the "dads' opinions aren't relevant" from? Because an internet forum for mothers said that this decision should be left to the parents and not the state?
/r/MensRights19/11/10 05:13 PM
3

They are correct in saying a women's value decrease with age. I've actually become somewhat curious about this statement. Do you really believe this to be true? That the only thing that matters in determining a person's worth is their sexual appeal to boys? A woman could be an award winning author, a groundbreaking scientist, a world famous sculptor, the mother of a President - but he only thing that counts is her sex appeal? Doesn't this seem terribly inane to you? I see this assertion over and…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 02:22 AM
3

Mind you, someone in your age group is reproductively speaking an utter waste. Well, I always was because I don't like children. it sure is fun watching all you women who told men what pieces of shit they are for your whole life live with the consequences.... Except we're not - except in the fantasies that you lads spin for each other. Where do you even get this crap from? Far from having "no options", I could have dated a different guy every night of the week. I didn't, because I'm picky, but I…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 08:11 PM
2

....as evidenced by the tons of men ignoring young, nubile women and lining up for the 48 year old 'hotties' I suppose? I wonder why this bothers you guys so much. It's like I've crushed one of your cherished dreams or something.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 07:28 PM
3

The attack "you can't get laid" is pathetic for you to make Ah - but when you make the exact same attack it's "science". They are correct in saying a women's value decrease with age. This is so stupid, I don't know why I'm bothering - but here goes: If the only metric that matters to you is sexual attraction for very young boys, you may be on to something. We'll just ignore the woman's professional achievements, families raised, relationships nurtured - every other thing that gives a person "val…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:27 PM
3

And it's disgusting to see all these comments gleefully predicting horrible futures for women. I've even seen comments along the lines of "Oh those bitches want equality? I'll show them "equality" if you know what I mean >:)" I don't know if you saw my other comment, but one of them actually said to me: "I'll be sportfucking barely legal teens while your 50 cats are pissing on you." This idea that we're going to end up bitter and alone is so very, very important to them. It's like a cornerstone …
/r/MensRights08/11/10 03:04 AM
2

No, hun, she's a fucking whore. Because all women are. I think I'm going to do a research project about this recurring ultimate vengeance theme I see cropping up so often. I really do see it over and over: "the bitches may have the upper hand now, but just wait til they get all wrinkled and no one wants them anymore." You actually have to feel sorry for them, if that's the one thing that they cling to for consolation. And it's not even true. Me and all my other old bat friends find that there's …
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:51 AM
2

Game theory (the economic kind) says your situation is and extreme outlier I see that it is very important to you to cling to your ultimate vengeance scenario. I've probably deeply upset you tonight, so I'm going to show you the mercy you don't deserve (because, after all, the thing that is so near and dear to your heart is your glorying in the imaginary suffering of other people - and that makes you a prick) and I'm going to leave this be. Pity is really all you can muster from me anyway, so it…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:42 AM
3

So, none of you are married. Your guys are safe from divorce-theft. That is all I'm telling guys--rent, don't buy. Good lord - give it up! The guys are not the ones reluctant to get married. Why do you make that assumption and why on earth is it so important to you?
/r/MensRights08/11/10 01:52 AM
3

...for sex. And it's the betas who never got any play and don't excite you much, but it's all you can get at that age. Keep dreaming. Me and my friends range from the late 40's to early 60's. 4 of us have monogamous boyfriends that are crazy about us that we met within the last 2 years. This revenge fantasy is so important to your well being that you will just not give it up - despite any and all evidence. This idea that older women can't find good men is just not true. My boyfriend is a musicia…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 01:33 AM
4

Studies clearly show the more partners a woman has before marriage, the less likely it will last. "Used up" may not be the best phrase to describe this effect, but the ideas are not dissimilar. I seriously doubt that the phrase was used in this context (if that's even true - it sounds like dodgy logic to me) - the "when no man wants you" part demonstrates the (mean) spirit in which it was written. My own experience shows that it's bullshit anyway - plenty of men want women when they are out of t…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 01:06 AM
3

Life doesn't give us sense. It gives us lessons and we have to figure out the meaning. "Life" didn't give us this post - and as far as I can see, the only "lesson" involved is that some men really hate women.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 11:08 PM
4

Okay but the title of this thread is still talking about how men should react to it, so I'm not sure what point you are making in that context. That makes it even more nonsensical: men should ignore women because they do something that men also do. ??
/r/MensRights07/11/10 10:53 PM
5

What you are missing is the sweet guy who adored her but that she blew off to chase the distant guy instead. I'm not "missing" it. What I said was that "this is not a female only phenomenon."
/r/MensRights07/11/10 09:52 PM
6

wonder why no man wants you when you're older and all used up" syndrome. What exactly does "used up" mean? I think this is an idea that you find consoling, as in "all these bitches who won't give me the time of day now will get theirs someday". I actually had one guy tell me that he would be "sportfucking barely legal teens while my 50 cats were peeing on me." The problem is, it's not true. There are plenty of guys around for women in every age group and there always will be. I was dating in my …
/r/MensRights07/11/10 09:49 PM
0

Endorsing utter drivel like this is why 98% of humanity will never take you seriously. Wow - what insight! People in their 20's aren't necessarily ready to settle down. I'm blinded by the brilliance of this revelation. Does this guy honestly think this is a female only phenomenon? I can't count how many 20 something guys I knew who had a lovely, sweet girl who adored them, but who just weren't ready to commit. It makes me sad that someone would post this as if it actually contains something wort…
/r/MensRights07/11/10 09:19 PM
1

This post seems to be as misdirected as much as OP's. Misdirected how? I directly addressed her points.
/r/MensRights04/11/10 11:49 PM
1

And a female urologist is like an auto mechanic who's never owned a car. 'Cause women don't have urinary tracts?
/r/MensRights01/11/10 05:29 PM
0

WTF is the point of this post? "My friend said something sexist - that's terrible! Yet, there is a little bit of truth to it..." ?? I can completely understand if a woman prefers to see a female gynecologist if she's been through domestic violence or her religious beliefs discourage it. It is absolutely none of your business what doctor a person chooses for whatever reason! Seriously - who the hell do you think you are, and why would anyone give a shit if you approve of or "understand" their mot…
/r/MensRights01/11/10 05:27 PM
-2

Hes only doing this b/c people in Mens Rights were getting pissed off at 2XC Ah, so his actions are determined by his attempt to emulate feminists. What a man!
/r/MensRights30/10/10 03:06 PM
1

The only place I know of on reddit that actually has the balls to ban feminist concern trolls is /r/MaleStudies Oh yeah, right - it takes "balls" to ban people from something they've never even heard of because you suspect that they might disagree with you. I don't know what it actually takes, but it is the polar opposite of "balls". That guy is the biggest crybaby on reddit.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 02:40 PM
20

he doesnt wash his hands after the toilet (oldies rarely do) So - in the same breath - you condemn men being the victims of stereotypes, while perpetuating one just as nasty about senior citizens. The hypocrisy - it's strong with this one!
/r/MensRights26/10/10 03:08 PM
2

vast knowledge of googling and sounding authoritative! Ha - excellent word! I just used it to call someone else out for being smug about something they really don't know much about.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 10:40 PM
5

But they don't make false rape claims. You sure about that, Shakey? So sure that you didn't even bother to google the topic before making your assertion?
/r/MensRights22/10/10 07:27 PM
2

Rape is something is taken likely, so falsely accusing someone of it shouldn't be taken likely either. Please tell me that English is not your first language.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:57 PM
6

..Banging her away is not solving anything It's quite possible that the girl has mental problems, but I think that seeing people serve prison time for making false accusations might make others think twice before doing it themselves. If they want to let her see a shrink while she's in prison, that would be fine.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:56 PM
8

This is why I'm gay, I'm actually bisexual but yeah, I'd rather be gay. Yeah, cause gay men are famous for being 100% drama and bullshit free.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:52 PM
1

Actually, someone did decide to feminize education, starting with Harvard prof Carol Gilligan. At a time when girls and boys were just about equal in primary and secondary educational achievement, a concerted effort was made to make education even more girl-friendly to serve a political purpose. Okay. I was just referring to kids' being kept quite and still in class - this is not a recent development.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 04:40 PM
2

Not always. Some people think recess is a waste of time better spent on academics. That's ridiculous! I can't sit still for 4 hours working on one thing and they expect kids to be able to do it?
/r/MensRights21/10/10 04:20 PM
0

We pay taxes for boys to be educated. Are you saying all public funds should be used to promote eduction for only 1 gender? Traditionally, schools are places where kids are forced to be quiet and, well, studious. No one decided that they would be that way to foster girls' education to the detriment of boys. Schools were like that before girls were even allowed in them - so this is not part of some nefarious plot. If you want to start a different kind of school, one where rambunctiousness is enco…
/r/MensRights21/10/10 04:17 PM
6

Embarrassing tripe. Yeah, but once someone uses the word "mangina" their credibility with anyone but the most hard-core activists will evaporate. No one else will take anything the guy says seriously.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 03:52 PM
0

why do schools today favor only girl type of behavior? Do you think that schools used to encourage boy-type behavior? Things were, if anything, worse in the past when children were "to be seen and not heard." At least they have recess now. Maybe you could get together with other concerned people and start raising funds to start a school for boys where boy behavior would be nurtured and not subdued. I'm sure there are plenty of parents of boys that would like to see this happen.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 03:24 PM
1

Only because you're approaching it from a bigoted standpoint You've got that exactly backwards. The bigoted standpoint is what I'm objecting to. You can't have it both ways: that statutory rape is fine if the female is the underage party, but a heinous crime if the male is underage.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 01:35 AM
5

Have you read feminist carol gilligan, she says women's morality is different than men's Oh, it must be true then. Do you blindly believe everything every random "feminist" says? If so, you're in the wrong reddit.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 02:02 PM
2

I agree that it's beyond outrageous to hold someone financially responsible for actions that they can not have legally consented to. What confuses me is this: In statutory rape cases where the female is the underage party, the consensus comments agree that the system penalizes male sexuality and the male should not be punished for doing what's natural. In statutory rape cases where the male is the underage party, the consensus comments agree that the system penalizes male sexuality and the femal…
/r/MensRights16/10/10 02:54 AM
9

I don't think you know what the word 'indisputable' means.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 03:52 PM
5

Wait. Isn't it supposed to be feminists who can't take jokes? This is the stupidest post I will see all day.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 05:43 PM
8

figuring out breast cancer is fun! Yeah! Having your boobs squished incredibly hard hard by a machine is fun!!!!!! I bet you go every week. What a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights12/10/10 05:58 PM
6

One of my dads old students, a beautiful proud woman, made the mistake of protesting the School of the America's too visibly Horrible story! My mom used to go to those protests.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 07:31 PM
10

If a police officer told a woman that if she broke the law she'd be raped, he'd lose his job What makes you think this? Cops can say pretty much anything to anyone and get away with it. They have also been know to actually rape women and get away with it. I imagine your point is that prison rape is completely unacceptable and one of the great disgraces of our society. If rape doesn't constitute cruel and unusual punishment, I don't know what does. it is not a problem for men only though. Women a…
/r/MensRights11/10/10 02:47 PM
3

You're right. Overpopulation is a bitch. In the case of a fire lock the doors down and then those fuckers burn. I think I wasn't awake enough when I made that stupid comment!
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:41 PM
3

If they want out of the burning building first maybe they should wear shoes that lend themselves to running instead of attracting husbands. I can't answer for them. I walk 3+ miles a day while commuting and wear appropriate footwear.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 04:25 PM
3

People with children or spouses first Why? The earth is way overpopulated. Why should people who chose to contribute to the problem be granted preferential treatment? They should be fined for their irresponsibility, not rewarded.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 03:47 PM
1

You need to get the younger guys with you and file a class action law suit over sex descrimination Who exactly will be named in the suit? A bunch of people panicking in a stairway? Another bunch arguing in a meeting? Until they institute a written policy that is discriminatory, there's really no one to sue.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 03:45 PM
9

The young men should go first, because they are stronger and faster and will not be creating a traffic jam. That's just as sexist and illogical as the reverse. There's plenty of young male couch potatoes who are completely out of shape - and plenty of middle aged women who hit the gym every day.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 03:42 PM
0

I think that a lot of women (and some men, of course) working very, very hard and with great dedication "put breasts first". You can do the same with prostate cancer if you work for it. Get out there and start fundraising! Complaining on the internet isn't going to change anything.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 02:34 PM
10

it's largely been the norm to portray men as buffoons, and the wives as clever Yes, clever - and bossy, bitchy, stuck-up, know-it-alls.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 06:19 PM
5

I'm going to go ahead and express my skepticism that it's any easier to find a good man than it is to find a good woman. Many people - not just women, not just men - are selfish, spoiled, greedy assholes. If you don't want to get burned by someone like that - avoid them. I've been dating for 30 years - I know how to spot an unsuitable person. If you're going to fall apart because the rules are not the same as they were for your parents - by all means, take yourself out of the dating pool. There'…
/r/MensRights05/10/10 05:34 PM
10

Even I find this kind of offensive. I don't think the women would like it if some guy came to 2XC and sat everyone down to tell them what's what. Once in a while I argue with someone here when something really strikes a nerve, but this is their reddit and they can and should vent however they please.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 03:27 PM
5

Ad hominems again? Come on! You can't legitimately make this accusation and then turn around and call the other person names and make all kinds of personal attacks. Look at onmyfaceplease's post and your response and tell me which is more ad hominem-y. There's no comparison! It was a bad day for reddit when people started reading about logical fallacies on wikipedia. Or I guess taking Logic 101 since you're mostly college kids.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 09:23 PM
1

FWIW: I banned this troll in r/MaleStudies When did the definition of 'troll' go from "someone who intentionally disrupts discussions by deliberately posting provocative or controversial statements for the sole purpose of angering/upsetting people and getting them riled up" to "anyone who shows signs of disagreeing with me"?
/r/MensRights28/09/10 07:50 PM
-9

Why are you guys being downvoted? Yeah, really! This is supposed to be safe place for hate speech directed towards women.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 07:13 PM
4

That is why so many wives get killed by their husbands in an age when the husbands are not protected from domestic abuse I am pretty sure you are mistaken about the motivation for husbands murdering their wives. Do you have anything to back up your assertion?
/r/MensRights28/09/10 05:36 PM
12

This is why most men don't want a serious relationship. Most men? Do you seriously think that's true? Maybe most men in your MR arena, but it's not most men in general, I assure you.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 05:17 PM
4

Marriage is Retirement for women! Where do you live? I wanna move there! Because I don't know a single wife/mother who doesn't work at least as many hours as their husbands.
/r/MensRights25/09/10 07:49 PM
1

Could you elaborate a bit on the premise in the headline?
/r/MensRights15/09/10 05:39 PM
6

That's what jail is for, lifting weights, getting stronger, raping effeminate liberal punks. Here you have a big reason why nothing will get done about men being raped in jail. If alleged male activists feel comfortable dissing these victims, what hope is there that mainstream society will give a shit about them?
/r/MensRights30/08/10 03:29 PM
14

Are they still considered "trolls" when they're a funded national body (eg: NOW) making laws to govern you and your children? The authors of this blog are not a "nationally funded body". They are two insane people ranting - probably because it makes them feel important.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 03:23 PM
5

I always wondered where all the feminists who actually do hate men are. Now I know. This person and her acolytes are truly despicable.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 03:16 PM
-1

your you're And don't worry - I didn't really expect you to get it. I realize that the subtleties of why what you said was messed up is probably beyond your grasp.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 11:44 PM
8

it's called a "divorce rate", moron Oh, thanks for educating me. Somehow I didn't realize that the divorce rate = "women causing trouble".
/r/MensRights26/08/10 08:45 PM
1

On behalf of the sane and smart women of the world I would like to apologize for those dumb bitches.. Seriously? You feel compelled to apologize for something done by people you don't know because they have the same kind of parts as you? That's incredibly fucking silly. Did men go around apologizing for Jeffrey Dahmer because they all have penises? For Bernie Madoff? No, right? Because that would just be ridiculous. And some stupid women making stupid jokes don't "bring us back 100 years". What …
/r/MensRights26/08/10 08:18 PM
7

I would expect that women who make this decision are statistically more likely to cause trouble later on... Haha! You really think they keep statistics on whether or not women are likely to "cause trouble"?
/r/MensRights26/08/10 08:03 PM
1

I'm glad you are one of the people able to separate "masculism" from men and do not stereotype or dehumanize men. :) I adore men! And I don't suffer it quietly when i see them disparaged in other subreddits either. Every time I've been called a man-hater or a feminazi (and, by the way, thanks for adding that one into the lexicon, Rush), what I was actually doing was defending my fellow females from some vicious slur or another. In no way was I misusing, abusing or or disrespecting man-people. I …
/r/MensRights23/08/10 12:27 AM
2

Another theory is that men realized that women have escalated the gender war and are more than willing to use hate as a weapon. Hatred is an emotion (not a tactic) and, as such, it is not governed by logic and rationality. I doubt very much that either side saw "how effective" it was and consciously chose to utilize it. Emotions just don't work that way. A small percentage of women hate men and a small percentage of men hate women. Once you dehumanize your perceived opponent - converted them int…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 10:39 PM
2

Ahh, so .0009% of men have positions of authority! According to feminists "logic" that surely must mean ALL men have positions of power! Eh? The logic twisting here is all you. Saying that most positions of power are held by men does not imply that most men hold positions of power - you made that leap on your own. It does, however, prove that we are not inhabiting a matriarchy - in which most positions of power would be held by women. Feminism is a hate movement I've never studied formal feminis…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 09:52 PM
-1

patriarchy simply doesn't exist, in this horribly sexist society. Matriarchy certainly does, and drives our current societies. There is no definition of matriarchy that reflects the current government of the United States. The President and Vice President are men. In the House of Representative, there are 357 men and 78 women. The Senate has 82 men and 18 women. Out of 50 states, 6 have female governors. Because of this unusual application of the word 'matriarchy', it is difficult to know precis…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 08:33 PM
2

If feminism were to be replaced by interest groups that work with women’s issues without attacking men, and without trying to monopolize the gender discourse, then masculists would be able to focus completely on working with men’s issues, without needing to analyze and criticize feminism. However, that is not the world we live in. This argument is completely blind to the fact that, while masculists may need to "analyze and criticize feminism", what they actually do (if /r/MR is representative of…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 03:04 PM
3

If you're making $35,000 a year That's about what my boyfriend makes. I'm 5'7" and I weigh 130 lbs. I think you're hanging out with the wrong kind of women.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 11:43 PM
1

it is obvious that you are female. That explains your response. Pathetic - that's all I can say. Thank goodness you have a support system.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 08:07 PM
2

I think he hates bullshit. Yeah? Then why does he spew so much of it?
/r/MensRights18/08/10 08:06 PM
0

Hard to say if the author of this drivel hates men or women more.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 08:17 PM
6

Don't worry about jayhammers. He's a little slow I'd love to see an AMA done by this girlfriend of his. (I'll take him at face value that there is such a person, though it's hard to imagine!)
/r/MensRights01/08/10 08:15 PM
-2

With this attitude, it is no surprise that this guy can only find vicious, gold-digging cunts to have relationships with. No sane woman with self-respect and a genuine liking for men would touch that mess with a ten foot pole. Like water seeking its own level, the people we have relationships with tend to reflect our own values and qualities. You'd have to be quite damaged to look at relationships in such a petty, mercenary way. And "women" aren't threatened by porn. Girls with self-esteem defic…
/r/MensRights01/08/10 08:01 PM
7

I would personally like to have a paternity test automatically done for me just to assure me, and so that my wife doesn't think that I'm being suspicious. Hurts nobody, benefits everybody. This sounds fine to me. I would like to think it could happen. Men get a raw deal with family issues.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 11:38 PM
5

30% of paternity tests reveal that the subject was not in fact the father. 30% is the high end of the number for paternity testing done when there is already a known high probability that there is paternity fraud being perpetrated. It is not even close to the number for the general population. You could also look at the reverse statistic: 70% of men who are certain they are the victim of paternity fraud are wrong.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 11:35 PM
2

Just like cigarette smoking, it seems that violence is the new way that women are expressing their equality Cigarette smoking began to be portrayed as glamorous for women many years ago. Look at movies from the 40's - you won't see a starlet without a cigarette. There is nothing "new" about this practice.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 02:04 PM
-1

Source I understand that citing an agenda site as a "source", as opposed to the actual research, will give you results that seem to support your claim, but it is not very good for your credibility. The high figure (30%), often quoted as the incidence of paternity fraud, refers to cases where there is already reason for suspicion - testing is done when there is a known high probability of fraud. This is not the rate of paternity fraud in the general population. From Wikipedia: "A 2005 scientific …
/r/MensRights29/07/10 07:43 PM
-1

Congrats helleborus! Thanks! You do a very poor job of filling in blanks and make astounding leaps of logic from utterly insufficient evidence. There is no point talking to you - it's like arguing with someone who's drunk.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 12:27 AM
-6

we can all only assume you are a misandrist with issues. Because I took issue with a misleading headline? And I'm supposed to be the one with issues? Hahaha, thanks for the chuckle!
/r/MensRights16/07/10 02:48 PM
-1

The only other violence As long as don't count "the use of knives, guns, choking, or burning, and it was not concerned with the kind of situation that can drive a woman to seek shelter outside the home". So this is far from "the only other violence". The title is absolutely wrong.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 02:01 PM
3

the shit radical feminists pull over in 2xc Haha! You've never actually read 2XC, have you?
/r/MensRights12/07/10 08:13 PM
8

I commend your efforts sweet cheeks. <3 Thanks! You got trolled hard and got all emotional about it (the hallmark of a successful troll, yes?), and then apologized to a bunch of defectives who despise you. Did you read the utterly hateful comments in this thread? And you apologize to these rejects? You're a disgrace! Have a nice weekend!
/r/MensRights08/07/10 08:59 PM
4

these fucking cunts definitely deserve some Jay and Silent Bob attention You mean the cunts that made up this conversation to troll men's forums with? Yeah - they should get their asses handed to them.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 08:26 PM
7

I apologize for their behavior Seriously - Fuuuuuuck you! Apologize for your own sorry ass, not some made-up troll post. Oh, I get it - you wanna be "the cool chick" - carry on. Maybe you'll grow up some day.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 08:23 PM
39

By the hateful comments in this thread inspired by a made-up conversation? I am!
/r/MensRights08/07/10 06:08 PM
3

Do you not even read articles before posting them and coming up with a headline? Schyman explained that the money had been donated by two men who had chosen the course of action to illustrate the amount of money that women lose per minute due to discriminatory pay.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 07:04 PM
2

I imagine that, when he married her, he didn't know she was a spoiled harpy bitch and this behavior surfaced later on. I doubt very much that was the case unless they married within a few weeks of meeting. Everyone I know who married someone messed up - a drunk, a druggie, an abuser, bipolar, whatever - did so in full knowledge of the negative trait. They went ahead and got married anyway, thinking that it would all work out in some magical way.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 02:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter