TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hellokattie Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by hellokattie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

How dare you ask you husband for help!! You’re not a proper doormat unless you’re cooking him a meal while you’re giving birth...silly girl.
/r/RedPillWomen15/04/19 12:37 PM
6

You sound like a replica of her ex. Your ‘advice’ lacks sympathy and empathy to an EXTREME degree. The fact she’s 21 and only slept with one man, actually proves she’s the opposite of ‘easy.’ You are probably new to TRP and angry. Someone who has genuinely loved a woman wouldn’t have given the ‘advice’ you just spewed so I’m definitely wasting my time replying to you 🤷‍♀️
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/19 12:56 PM
2

The thing with true abusers is they’re cowards so of course they target the weak - that’s exactly why they are monsters
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/19 10:32 AM
10

He would beat the crap out of his dogs That should have failed 100% of vet checks. Personally I take animal abuse more seriously than abuse towards people. The fact the animal can’t fight back means it’s on the same level as baby/child abuse and those people are monsters.
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/19 07:33 AM
2

Yes because she’s NOT HIS MOTHER! Sexual love is selfish. Therefore there has to be something in it for her. Why do men get so offended by this notion? It’s like you previously thought of women as saints. Women have always accepted that a mans love (except for our father) is conditional, we’ve known it since birth. Sometimes it even feels like he loves our vagina more than our soul. But again that’s sexual love for you! 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 11:14 PM
1

Yes because she’s not his mother!! Sexual attraction for women is mental so there are many more facets to their sex drive. Men can get turned on by a PICTURE. Obviously their requirements are not going to be as extensive lol. This does not make his love greater or more valid than hers. Similarly a women shouldn’t go round looking for a man who will love her as purely as her father. It’s not possible and it leads to a victims mentality
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 11:05 PM
1

This misses the point entirely though. TRP doesn't say women are incapable of unconditional love, period. It says that a woman's 'love of a man' is conditional. In exactly the same way that a mans love for a woman is conditional! But TRP has a ‘holier than thou’ position where they claim that men love women unconditionally - absolute bullshit. Yet you don’t see women complaining that men don’t truly love them because that’s just the nature of romantic/sexual love: Unlike platonic love, sexual lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 10:34 PM
1

For me being feminine gives me power. Men have no defense against femininity and if you use it just right - the world is your oyster. ‘Men control the world. Women control men.’ No I don’t think all women need to be stay at home mothers. Certainly I personally am on a very different path.
/r/RedPillWomen11/04/19 10:19 PM
2

How else should I argue my views then? Just say that my gut feeling is that men and women have an equal capacity for love? Not very convincing is it. The statement that women generally their love children a whole lot more than men love their wives and girlfriends is objectively true. If you take this to the extreme you can also say it’s proof that women have a greater ability to love then men. Now I personally believe that the souls of human beings have no gender and for this reason I think our …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 10:01 PM
2

Yes I use that argument for intellectual purposes. Personally I’m not sexist enough to actually believe it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:50 PM
1

it just backs up what TRP has been saying. IT's just said in a masculine way while you are saying it in a feminine way I chose that hill to stand on because as you rightly point out it’s the same argument that TRP uses except from the female perspective. I hoped RP men would realize how crazy of an assumption they make once they see the female version of the same claim. Honestly I think its equally as ridiculous from this female perspective as the male centric version from TRP. I used it though …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:46 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:24 PM
2

If you want to know my personal opinion- I don’t think gender has anything to do with love whatsoever. There is no way of knowing whether men love women or women love men more. The truth is that it depends on the individual people I do believe love is the answer to everything and something we regardless of gender, need to develop and practice in ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:17 PM
3

But women’s love for children is greater than men’s love for women. This means that women have a greater capacity in general for love itself then men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:51 PM
3

Gay male relationships are based primarily on sex and having sex. Men understand very well what other men want. Sure, they're gay, but they're still men, and they still approach sex as men do. So essentially gay men, who are technically the only ones capable of truly loving a man the way he wants to be loved (cause women can’t of course) are surprise surprise just not that interested in love and according to their actions care more about sex...interesting. What men really want from women is resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:49 PM
3

This Freudian idea that men are always looking for their mothers...Well I could say the same - I want a man to love me as unconditionally as my father loves me. But that’s not very realistic is it! As women we know and accept that no man is capable of loving us as purely as our father did. Sexual love by definition is less pure than platonic love because it is selfish in a way that platonic love is completely selfless! Plato himself said this. The fact that some people need to be told this genui…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:24 PM
3

So how does this theory convey to Gay relationships? Do two men love each other precisely in the way that men want to be loved? And how exactly does their love differ from the way a woman loves a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:21 PM
1

So you then say love is love. Which is it? Love is love, or men's love of women can ever compare to a woman's love of her children? It can be both and it is both. A mans love for a woman will never compare to a woman’s love for her child. However this does not mean his love for her is any less valid. Different does not mean worse. In the same way that your love for a cat is different to your love for a dog and yet your love for both is equally valid. Plato talks about 7 different types of love. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 07:25 PM
2

I still find it interesting though that you didn’t directly compare women love for man vs mans love for women. If i knew how one could make such a comparison i would because I do wholeheartedly believe it would show that women love men just as much as men love women. It’s like you’re saying women have the greater capacity for love in general This was precisely my argument. I used the child comparison because the love between a mother and child is the most highly respected form of love in human c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 07:18 PM
2

No such statement was made. My argument was that the love of men to women is not comparable to that of a woman to her child. Because a woman loves her child MORE than a man could ever love a woman!! This means that women technically have a greater capacity for love then men ;) I said nothing of the love of women to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 06:52 PM
2

Wow. That’s a lie because those were not my words. Please don’t misquote me: I would go so far as to say that the love of a man for a woman can never be compared to level of love a woman has for her own child. If you actually read it you’ll notice that I state that the love of a MAN TO A WOMAN is not comparable to the love of a woman to a child. So essentially men are not capable of love to the extent that women are capable of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 06:49 PM
2

This is very different then how men and women love each other. So you love your wife differently to how you love your children. Yet you’re also capable of loving both your wife and children unconditionally. On the other hand your wife somehow is only capable of loving the kids unconditionally, and when it comes to you it’s not really proper love more a sort of warmth I’m guessing?? Honestly the ego is astonishing. I don’t understand the need to strictly define the various types of love. I mean l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 06:32 PM
1

Of course women have the capacity to love their children more than their spouse!! Women also have the capacity to love their spouse more than their own children!! Wow it’s not that rare either! The capacity for these scenarios to exist does not justify the insane belief perpetrated by TRP that women are completely incapable of unconditional love.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 06:23 PM
1

How did I admit that? Please explain instead of making blanket statements. What i would say is that the ability for unconditional love is what makes us HUMAN BEINGS and if women are not capable of unconditional love, you are suggesting that they are not truly human...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 05:50 PM
3

Haha you’ve got them between a rock and a hard place. If Trp theory on women not being capable of loving were true than you have the perfect argument. To me though the whole ‘women aren’t capable of love’ thing is utter bullshit. We are all human. Human beings are capable of love just like we’re all capable of suffering. Whether a woman ever loves a man like she capable of is another question entirely, however her capacity for unconditional love is not debatable. Especially towards their childre…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 05:15 PM
1

The first step is to believe in your worth. A sense of dignity is a fundamental part of dating. Think of it as you don’t ‘need’ a girl you are open to dating a girl if and only if she adds to your life. Try and internalize that because it’s true and it’s healthy. After that witty retorts and banter are much easier because you are testing her as much if not more than she is testing you! Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 10:10 PM
1

Pretty sure no one on tinder is looking for a relationship but I agree with the the second part of your sentence. The only problem is that guys lie, especially when it involves potential sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 12:26 PM
4

But those guys are just looking for sex I think the question was about finding a partner
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 12:17 PM
3

The advice would rather be to not look like giving her attention is all you've got in your life. Yes! This is exactly what I meant - I don’t wanna feel like I’m making your day or life for that matter by sending you text :) She should need to make an effort to keep the conversation witty and interesting. That’s only possible if you have a bit of a 'too cool for school' vibe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 12:14 PM
4

As a woman to men: I’m always most attracted if a man can tease me and give it back in full if i make a joke at his expense! Added bonus if I have to work for his attention - it shouldn’t given on a silver platter even if you’re not the most high value guy (girls love the hunt/chase too!) Most importantly NEVER apologize in the early stages. If you’ve hurt her or made a mistake properly admit to being in the wrong, but do it without using the word 'sorry.' Ps. this advice is what I’ve noticed ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 11:01 AM
2

Wow can you even read?
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/19 12:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter