TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hellomynameisCallum Archive

View 2 posts and 29 comments by hellomynameisCallum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Men say they like football, but they also say they don’t like sport. Wtf is up with that??
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:01 AM
12

My initial reaction was ‘yey, they’re finally jailing these twats’ Then I realised what sub I’m on and how messed up that reaction is
/r/PussyPass15/11/18 07:12 AM
1

Friendly reminder that most feminists would think this is as ridiculous as we find it! This school is nuts
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:26 PM
5

I came here to say that this is the main difference. But in a case of assault, the strength of the attacker’s hits is rarely a factor in the punishment received. Same should go for this
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:34 AM
2

Yeah I guess I would start to agree with you there. I’m still adamant that you could teach her this lesson without making her cold. But I guess that if you are both going to be equally unhappy without a coat, you should probably keep your coat. At the end of the day, it probably comes down to how much each of you need the coat and how much you care about her feelings
/r/MensRights29/10/18 06:22 PM
1

Excuse me? I have done this before and it’s likely that I will do this again in future, when anyone is more in need of a coat than I am. You don’t even know me how how can you tell me how I feel and label from one comment I’ve made?
/r/MensRights29/10/18 06:19 PM
1

I agree, but claiming that your reluctance to give up your coat is in order to inspire growth is pretty far fetched
/r/MensRights29/10/18 07:32 AM
1

Alternatively, you could give up your jacket and say “I’m doing this now, but please remember your jacket in future”? And I know I’d do this for male friends, my girlfriend and other girls too, so it’s not really to do with sex at all
/r/MensRights29/10/18 07:00 AM
1

Yeah, and his answer sucks
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:01 PM
1

Also, sometimes the police require news channels to anonymise suspects due to various reasons (the suspect being in danger if known, the risk of evasion increasing). I’m not sure how it works in the country of origin, but one woman with a blurred face and one man without a blurred face is not even close to evidence of a bias
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:43 AM
4

Agreed! Some (most?) feminists want equality in exactly the same way that men’s rights activists want equality. We can’t say “Feminists are bad because they’re all crazy” and “Men’s Rights Activists are all correct”. Some Feminists are absolute pieces of shit, in the same way that some people on this sub are massive twats. But that doesn’t represent the whole movement. There have been quite a few cases of some quite nasty people on this sub recently and we must keep calling them out
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:02 AM
2

Exactly! There has been a massive influx of genuinely fucked up sexists on this subreddit recently, and we need to keep calling them out. Clearly ‘women’ are not raised like this as the vast vast vast majority of women wouldn’t do this
/r/MensRights18/10/18 04:33 PM
15

I think it comes from the fact that the foetus is currently part of her body. If a woman wants to chop her arm off, then that’s legal. If a man chopped a woman’s arm off, that’s illegal. I think that the differences are being caused by one side seeing the foetus as ‘part of the woman’ and one side seeing the foetus as ‘an individual being carried by the woman’
/r/PussyPass16/10/18 09:48 AM
47

It’s always good to remind ourselves that the vast majority of women (and men) are like this. It is just that the few people who oppose normal society shout really loud
/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:47 PM
2

Yes it is. You said that women shouldn’t claim sexual assault unless they have said “no”, whereas I said that women can still be sexually assaulted before they’ve had time to say “no”
/r/MensRights08/10/18 10:22 PM
1

What do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 10:15 PM
4

Yeah it looks like we’re on the same page. I just find that most people who say “but she never said no! How was I supposed to know she wasn’t enjoying it” are the really creepy ones. Obviously if a girl is enthusiastically kissing someone and then goes back to his and has sex in which she actively participates and then calls someone out in the morning, she is a cunt and can go and fuck herself. If there is any doubt, there needs to be a dialogue. The attitude of “I can do whatever I want until s…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:17 PM
1

If there’s no doubt then you can go for it. If you feel that you are good at reading situations and you sense that you are both into each other then that’s absolutely fine for you to shoot your shot. However, I know a lot of guys who go straight in for kisses even after being rejected for doing this before. That shit isn’t ok. In my eyes, if you go to kiss a woman and she kisses back then you’re all good. If she dodged it and says no then you need to apologise, leave the situation and not do it …
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:08 PM
1

What even is this? If a woman looks uncomfortable being touched, stop touching her. If there is any doubt, ask or just stop touching her. Flirtation is not an invite to any form of sex. Sure it can lead that way and often does, but flirting does not mean you are owed sex
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:55 PM
1

Imagine if a feminist posted one dude on twitter saying “I hate girls”. This isn’t to do with men’s rights, it’s just one nut job of a women chatting shit on Twitter. Most feminists that I know would say she’s a twat
/r/MensRights05/10/18 10:40 PM
4

Not sure why people are answering this question with such hostility, but I’ll try to give you a fair answer. It all depends what you mean by ‘work at home’. If you mean people in those jobs where you can take a day of your working week to do emails etc. from your computer at home, then yes I would imagine that this is included within these statistics. If you mean non-job related working from home, like household chores, then this will not be included. You will have to guess for yourself whether …
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:54 AM
1

I’m not even mad about the title. It means that feminists will click on it, ready to arm themselves with more statistics in order to take down the patriarchy. Then BAM, they’ll realise women work shorter days then men. If the headline was “men work longer days than women”, no one would read it
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:40 AM
7

This has nothing to do with men’s rights issues. If you don’t like her, just don’t interact with her! It’s posts like these that give this subreddit (and men’s rights in general) a bad name. We really need to move away from this sub being equivalent to slandering women. Whether or not it funny is irrelevant. It has nothing to do with men’s rights at the end of the day
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:41 AM
1

Who was that? Do you have a link to an article?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:37 PM
8

We don’t know what would have happened if it were a man, so we can’t really get annoyed I’m not convinced this is a gender issue at all
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:09 AM
2

Very interesting invite, that’s very much for taking the time to respond
/r/MensRights12/05/18 09:06 PM
2

Thanks very much! There’s pretty good reads. I actually feel a bit of sympathy because I suppose a place for women to share tips isn’t that bad an idea. However, then I thought that if there was a website which was exactly the same but only men were allowed, they would almost certainly get sued too. Would you agree?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:03 PM
2

Thanks for the reply. Do you have a source?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:01 PM
61

How on earth is there a gap in the market for a website where you can donate to only women?
/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter