hemlock35 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
21	It's low stakes, man, don't sweat it		hemlock35	/r/TheRedPill	29/09/19 05:25 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	No, most men DON'T overestimate their own attractiveness Okay well I agree with the point I guess	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/01/23 10:31 PM
1	No, most men DON'T overestimate their own attractiveness I’d like the whole world to know captain oblivious is a tard of epic proportions.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/01/23 10:26 PM
12	No, most men DON'T overestimate their own attractiveness Goddamn dude check spelling	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/01/23 10:23 PM
1	For those of you 30+, do picky people really start to settle? No that’s modern first world politics.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/07/22 03:51 PM
1	How do you explain sexist women? I agree with the atheist politician assessment. The problem with defining something like judeo-Christian values is that it always ends in a moving goalposts and no true Scotsman debate. There are a million definitions I could give and you could find holes in every one of them. When I say judeo Christian values I’m mainly talking about the moral backbone of western society. I guess I use in contrast to nihilism or pure hedonism as I don’t see any western alternative that could readily be adopted …	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/04/22 10:06 PM
1	How do you explain sexist women? West Texas is hardly the region I’m speaking on, but I still don’t think policy is shaped by public opinion as it’s supposed to. It mainly favors… well you know the gist there. But like it or not me and you do share the judeo-Christian values and their morals are written in our heart. I’d be wary myself of a politician who ran with atheism on his shoulder. Outspoken atheism usually means you have a personal vendetta against religion. Which is not the clarity I want in a leader.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/04/22 06:37 PM
1	How do you explain sexist women? Newborn atheists (I’m one myself) always tend to demonize and magnify the role of religion in a land (the south) where it’s youth and middle age have really outgrown it. Other things are at work.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/04/22 04:12 PM
3	How do you explain sexist women? Religion isn’t nearly as powerful in southern states as you think.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/04/22 12:32 PM
3	How do you explain sexist women? Utah: can confirm Southern states: more at play Source: raised in one, live in the other	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/04/22 12:31 PM
2	Triggered by a confident woman. Missing the point	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/01/22 03:23 PM
1	It's low stakes, man, don't sweat it alright, I’ll take that first point. I’ve learned a good deal from this sub and will continue to. You misunderstand me when you say “assumes the red pill preaches some kind of over-analysis” I clearly do not. I say or imply that this is a common way to misrepresent the red pill. And yeah I did experience this a while ago, but that’s how I see a lot of people on my path doing the same thing. Nobody’s projecting.	/r/TheRedPill	29/09/19 05:45 PM
3	AWALT. Lesson's you can learn from Chanel Miller and Brock Turner Okay I know this is beside the point, but he had no chance of making the 2016 Olympic team. He wasn’t even scoring on Stanford. Let’s not conflate his accomplishments for our arguments sake.	/r/TheRedPill	20/09/19 06:08 PM
1	I started working 48hrs per week and even though my anxiety and inner dialogue is fucking with me every day, I am still turning up and my life IS slowly improving. Keep fucking going! You’ve got this man. You want something big, but it always starts slow. Head up.	/r/TheRedPill	25/08/19 01:50 PM
3	[rant] Why do you care so much? Twitter is perfect example that there is very little consensus in a certain part of our society (I’m American). It’s groups of people who can’t stand other people having differing views. This is most prominent in very delusional leftists, but people of opposite and differing opinions still use manipulative rhetoric and overly simplistic ideas to try and sway or put down other groups. Keep in mind that all of these groups and uncertainty fall under the penumbra of “society.”	/r/TheRedPill	05/07/19 03:28 PM
1	[rant] Why do you care so much? You’re putting a lot of weight on this entity called “society” I’m not sure it actually means anything. This term is meaningless because there is no entity that wants you to be a certain way. Society by definition is the institutions in which physical needs (food, water, shelter, etc.) are provided. People who tend to behave just like everybody else have it somehow in their head that this is the only way that they can survive. Which is why their personalities lash out at people who act different…	/r/TheRedPill	05/07/19 02:19 PM
2	How to get laid even though you're ugly Thank you dr. Freud, wanna give us a half-baked equation to help oversimplify this too?	/r/TheRedPill	19/06/19 03:23 PM
1	Women don't actually want their men to "be in touch with their feelings". Men don't show emotion or share their feelings because there is no benefit for them to do so in society or their relationships. Wow you did a great job at sucking any intellectual complexity from that dialogue	/r/TheRedPill	15/03/19 02:48 AM
1	Women don't actually want their men to "be in touch with their feelings". Men don't show emotion or share their feelings because there is no benefit for them to do so in society or their relationships. Monogamy is a relatively new societal idea that is meant to deal with the innate human concept of love. Just because society reflects something innate doesn’t mean it’s a good reflection or a good way to handle the issue.	/r/TheRedPill	14/03/19 09:50 PM
7	Women don't actually want their men to "be in touch with their feelings". Men don't show emotion or share their feelings because there is no benefit for them to do so in society or their relationships. Society reflects “innate human nature” if it is indeed that.	/r/TheRedPill	14/03/19 01:11 PM
24	Stop Whining. Love the pain Sounds oddly familiar to mike Tyson’s “everybody’s got a plan until they get punched in the face”	/r/TheRedPill	01/03/19 12:40 PM
1	The Friendship Myth Calm down, cowboy, I’ve addressed this in the responses.	/r/TheRedPill	29/07/18 06:33 PM
3	The Friendship Myth Yeah of course, I understand but I also see these kind of relationships in my friends. After witnessing a phenomena like this one, I start to speculate why certain relationships do in fact run in parallel to various ideas such as RP philosophy, and certain relationships seem to not follow suit. I come to a temporary conclusion and compare my speculations to your speculations, and we converse on those differences, and I have at least temporarily come to the conclusion that the RP philosophy overs…	/r/TheRedPill	29/07/18 06:23 PM
2	The Friendship Myth I agree that my definition of “sexism” is left ambiguous, but I do mention that Aristotle (see Politics) sees men as “naturally superior” and views women as only existential subordinates to men. So when he says that men and women can’t be in a virtue-based friendship (which is false I have three virtue based friendships with women, two of which I sleep with occasionally) I naturally distrust him because of his view of women as inherently inferior.	/r/TheRedPill	29/07/18 04:59 PM
17	The Friendship Myth The red pill, where it’s subscribers claim to have objective truth but refuse to engage with a minor objection/correction in a civil way. I didn’t even disagree with the OPs points as a whole.	/r/TheRedPill	29/07/18 03:51 PM
-43	The Friendship Myth Yeah but Aristotle was a little sexist. I’m a philosophy major and Aristotle has perhaps the greatest contributions to philosophy and scientific epistemology, but he had a sexist layer that wasn’t so hidden. He only thought men could achieve his good life and saw women as an inferior species.	/r/TheRedPill	29/07/18 02:40 PM
1	Frame is EVERYTHING “Male confidant” There’s the chauvinism rearing it’s ugly head. “Wear your insecurities as armor” Yeah that sounds like a good excuse not to deal with them because now they play a role in your moronic social power game, and god forbid anybody infringe on that.	/r/TheRedPill	17/04/18 06:40 PM
-11	Frame is EVERYTHING I’m not saying they aren’t owning their shit, I actually think that’s one of the good things about the red pill. However, the idea that your frame is more important than being vulnerable to your closest friends rather than seeing them a social pawns shows insecurity in of itself.	/r/TheRedPill	17/04/18 06:16 PM
-19	Frame is EVERYTHING Not really, this whole post seemed to portray to hide your insecurities by maintaining your frame. Then your insecurities won’t matter because your frame lets you act on your insecurities (I.e. saying or doing self deprecating things) without people noticing. Pretty shit message.	/r/TheRedPill	17/04/18 05:18 PM
6	Blue Pill Peterson Also I think Chomsky holds the view that the people of each socialist country were not conditioned properly for socialism. The Frankfurt school generally has very interesting thoughts, and I don’t think I would do them justice trying to explain them, but they have well thought out left wing opinions (not anything like our left wing today) and should be taken seriously.	/r/TheRedPill	07/02/18 02:55 PM
2	Blue Pill Peterson I’m convinced that very few left wingers understand the power structure that they are entering into when they embrace the ideology. Those at the top very well could be aware and very well could be as much slaves as the feminist going to UC Berkeley. They don’t see the word “kindness” as a euphemism for “control.” Not consciously, the psychoanalysts would probably have something to say about their subconscious though.	/r/TheRedPill	07/02/18 02:53 PM
4	Enough about lifting. Lets talk reading. I disagree that fiction, if properly selected is a waste of time. Good fiction offers an accurate perspective on certain social aspects of our society (I.e. Watchmen is a story all about moral ambiguity and the virtue of the public living on a lie).	/r/TheRedPill	07/02/18 02:48 PM