TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

heterosapian Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by heterosapian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

These people will always insist that you’d actually have been deeply scarred and traumatized from it, entirely drawing their morality at whatever the arbitrary US age of consent law is. Every time I talk to one of these people they seem to either be incels or only first had sex in their late twenties so they cannot conceptualize a reality that 16, 17, and 18 year olds around the world have sex - and most would say later in life it’s pretty bad with their classmates.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 01:20 PM
23

Quick way to get a settlement.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:04 AM
3

I mean sexuality is a wide spectrum to these people. They don’t have to know that by bisexual you actual mean if Hugh Jackman tried to come onto you, you would of course resist but if he was very persistent... you might pause before you resist which is clearly more gay than not pausing before you resist.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:57 AM
9

Honestly though the only way to really fight this is to start your own companies and pick up the talent these idiots are leaving behind because they’re too straight, too masculine, too white.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:50 AM
50

Like this obviously. But actually they would just call the police. Their thought process would be: “What older man who isn’t a pedophile/child molester is ever playing with a child at a park?”
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:02 AM
3

The UK is increasingly embarrassing but in the US the same kid might have shot up his entire classroom.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:27 AM
2

If you keep it in the limelight long enough, advertisers eventually take notice. They’re trying to sweep this away as quickly as possible. I suspect there’s a good portion of The NY Times readership who do actually care and may not have heard about this yet.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:41 AM
1

I agree if it’s deemed discriminatory for health insurance, it should be deemed discriminatory for car insurance. I rather we allow gender based pricing for both though.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:55 PM
1

Presumably because you’re missing a word and quoting it in contexts that aren’t particularly relevant.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:16 PM
1

Woman would pay more for health insurance and we should go back to that based on inherent risk. A woman who doesn’t want children might feel disadvantaged that she’s subsidizing women who do want children the same way that men who feel they’re safer drivers (which is every idiot here and not based on statistics at all) feel like they’re getting taken advantage of based on their gender. Fortunately, there are a lot more factors that come into play when determining risk. Unfortunately, the idiots …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:52 PM
1

Geography is taken into account in every risk model and there are models where men do pay less. This is not a case of every man paying more than every women - it’s a case of many men paying more because they have more risk. This case is only stupid because in terms of risk, a transwoman is still a man but I’ll leave the politics of that to others. My point is that the more factors there are, the more we can push risk onto those who are actually risky drivers. That’s why I’m saying to use more fa…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:34 PM
2

it’s economy. stupid Wow.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:12 PM
1

It’s not about presumed aggression. It’s a statistical fact that men have more claims just like a statistical fact new drivers have more claims. Woman pay more for healthcare because they live longer and need coverage for having children. More transparency wouldn’t hurt but I rather not do away with fact-based/usage-based pricing models. There’s a movement lately where algorithms are being called racist and sexist when they for instance give black men worse interest rates on home loans when the …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:25 AM
13

They will start charging the same rate for men and women and that rate will be what they used to charge men.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:01 AM
1

This is pretty much why Dr Lawrence Summers had to resign as president of Harvard. Hurt some feefees at a private conference stating there’s evidence that the differences in tenured professors in STEM, high end research positions, etc were in part due to differences in high end aptitude. Anyone in a software engineering position knows this in the private sector as well - the threshold you have to pass as a minority to get into a company with a diversity officer is vastly different than the thres…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 10:15 PM
6

I don’t think Snopes knows what segregation means. They claim it’s false because “nobody is obligated to attend either ceremony” but that’s not strictly necessary for it to be segregation. New segregation is “This party is for blacks only and is only relevant for blacks but we can’t legally kick you out if you want to come I guess”. The Harvard situation was blown out of proportion but segregated spaces definitely are becoming more prevalent and many are endorsed/created by colleges. They won’t …
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:36 AM
4

Employment lawsuit (check!)
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:19 PM
2

That goes back awhile. These people tend have this strange fascination with Malcolm X and others who outright opposed integration. He would have relegated blacks to separate areas like Chinatown or back to some fantasy version of Africa which isn’t miserable.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:55 PM
1

It would entail a plane ticket.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:38 PM
124

Also strange how many countries culturally push men to be much more masculine than in the US and these countries don’t have any problem with school shooters.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:41 PM
9

His parents divorced when he was 3 years old; his mother, Jill, later came out as a lesbian.[4] When he was 12, his father had neurological surgery following a mysterious assault. Days after being released from the hospital, he was readmitted for an infection and died as a result of an allergic reaction to an administered medication. This is some seriously strange doctor evil background. Why is it that men raised by lesbians categorically have such an affinity with “toxic masculinity”? This guy …
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:37 PM
162

There’s a number of white men currently suing Google for race/gender discrimination and it seems like they will win.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:51 PM
0

Yep, I’m truly devastated that I don’t get paid 45k to play hero and kill goat fuckers for muh freedom! How will I ever afford to lease a eco boost Mustang without my military discount? 😂 Aw cute, what did you get on your test? Were you an ENTJ or did you get a gold star? I’ll give credit where it’s due... at least you didn’t have to take it orally like the 10% of your battalion that’s at a 5th grade reading level.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:58 PM
0

Wow... if that’s your speech no wonder the military is having recruiting issues. That was a small glimpse into why they’ve been increasing the amount of bottom of the barrel fuckwits who don’t even have a GED for years now. There’s no nobility in trying to make the military out to be something it’s not. Not all jobs are created equal. Best of luck with your projection and platitudes.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:14 AM
1

It’s fucking hilarious how much those in the military think civilians are envious of their shitty jobs. It would have been funny to hear a recruiter spout the “are you man enough?” or whatever popular propaganda they’re known for but clearly they do enough due diligence to know what people they’d be completely wasting their time on. I literally am taking a shit right now and getting paid more than a grunt does for hours of being under fire from turban heads. When I get home, I am greeted by firs…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:27 PM
1

You do know that women were not allowed to serve in combat roles until January 2016? The lower standard that “benefits” (if being allowed into the military could ever be misconstrued as a benefit) their gender today is really from an era where they could only serve in a more limited capacity. Since that’s been lifted, women can apply for positions that necessitate more rigorous standards like special forces... and they will be denied just like men. To go with your own example, we really don’t ne…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 03:09 PM
1

I didn’t have recruiters knocking on my door because I’m not fucking Forrest Gump. I make 10x what the average soldier gets paid and have zero risk of stepping on IEDs.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:02 PM
-1

Please enlighten me how service women are incapable of equal work. It doesn’t take he-man strength to pull the trigger of an M16. If how fast you ran a mile correlated to combat lethality, the Kenyans would have thermonuclear capabilities. The reality is that there is basically no bar at all to be a grunt. They’re not looking for super-athletes, they’re looking for literally anyone without diabetes who is fit enough to carry a fucking backpack and stupid/disadvantaged enough to have no better pr…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:43 PM
1

Surely how fit you are in basic has no bearing on how much work you do. I’m a software engineer with an ivy degree but if I apply to work as a fry cook at McDonald’s, I’m going to get paid the same (or less) as all the other fry cooks who were taught in pantomime. That’s true nature of jobs with effectively no credentials... and in the military they’ll take just about anyone who isn’t blatantly unhealthy. There is plenty of disparity between men in fitness as well. They all get paid around the s…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 07:21 PM
20

It’s always been equal pay for equal work, not equal qualifications. A CEO who has an MBA from Harvard is not legally obligated to pay any female with an MBA from Harvard the same as himself. Titles are an easy way to get around disparities in pay. For the military, you’re not paid based on how many push-ups you can do. The idea is just that women of equal rank would get very similar pay to men. Obviously there are other factors like hazard pay, the fact that families get more benefits than sing…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:27 PM
0

Their ideology seems to be grounded in tribalistic ideas where one idiot defends another. My ideology is that of equality - I would report anyone here for the same. It’s not because I’m some arbiter of consequences or that I actually care if anyone gets a slap on the wrist for saying stupid things. I just find it funny how many people care so deeply about these dogshit platforms and would enjoy the off-chance she’s banned. She would think her life is ruined because she can’t stream her retarded …
/r/MensRights31/12/17 01:21 PM
2

Agreed but that would only happen if it was decentralized. All for-profit social media companies have selective enforcement of their own rules to cater to advertisers and mostly just circlejerk the prevailing views of SV. She should be reported like anyone else for hate speech even if they choose not to punish her for it.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 12:31 PM
5

Twitter is not a free speech platform.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 12:01 PM
1

Any fraternity? Granted, most of the people are more familiar with US law. The UK may be very different.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:05 AM
2

Men already outearn women. You’ll literally be subsidizing everyone with a women’s studies degree.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 06:53 PM
5

Men also have more patents and inventions - including just about every important one over the course of history. If males are predisposed to violence because of crime statistics, they must also be predisposed to having more brainpower because of patent statistics.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:34 AM
1

You’re delusional. Have you seen Megyn Kelly’s interview with Putin? She clearly doesn’t have the mental capacity to stand toe to toe with world leaders who do more than name-call. Romney isn’t even in contention with those other names. He was well respected at Bain and in the liberal state where he governed. He’s a decent human being which throws out people like O’ Reilly. He’s also, amazingly, a year younger than Trump and looks like he could live another 50 years - some sort of Mormon skin ju…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 04:11 AM
1

The sentiment of friendliness is by your own attribution though. They both mean fatties and they’re used interchangeably even within the article.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:07 PM
3

What the fuck does that have to do with this article? They literally use plus-sized and overweight interchangeably... like the first sentence uses plus-sized to describe both men and women. There’s so many legitimate issues men face. Being villainized by fatties for only liking objectively attractive women isn’t one of them. That’s just legitimately funny. It’s a small minority viewpoint that’s not worth taking seriously and men aren’t the only ones who have to deal with it. There’s an equally r…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:56 PM
1

Which is stupid to write an article about but seems reasonable enough. You can’t really control who you’re attracted to - being fat themselves doesn’t make them hypocrites for not thinking other fat people are attractive. They probably don’t find themselves attractive either. I don’t see how anyone views this as a male issue. Overweight men still have some desirability in society if they’re rich or funny or even charismatic. I can’t say the same for women who derive so much of their social value…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:40 PM
1

The presumption of innocence is not a flaw in the judicial system. Of course you're familiar with how much bias gets in the way - when the perp is male, when the perp is a minority, when the perp is poor, etc but it's still a desirable quality of our system even if it rarely plays out as intended. You can assign whatever narrative you want to any court case before or after a verdict is given. Society has continued to punish even those found innocent of their alleged crimes like OJ Simpson. Ultim…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:21 PM
1

Most 19 year olds who have sex with someone no more than 5 years younger don't need any rehabilitation. They're not rapists. They're not pedophiles. They barely miss the mark for Romeo and Juliet statutes which are written without discretion. A matter of weeks is often the difference between the registry and consensual sex.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:31 PM
2

It's telling that you consider an age gap of 5 years to miraculously be a grade gap of 7 grades. There were more than a few 19 year olds in my high school. It's very regular to repeat a year going into private school, to be held back a year for developmental reasons, or to repeat a year if you've moved from a foreign country. There were also plenty of 14 year old freshman turning 15. Some of them looked like kids but some of them looked like this. It's not "just as wrong" to assume innocence ins…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 02:22 PM
2

It's definitely abnormal but is it criminal? In the absence of the older party being in a position of power - I think we should strongly err on the side of no. There are many young people between 14 and 18 who are old enough to give consent - it varies from state to state and country to country. Do we want a matter of weeks of maturity deciding non-violent felony charges? It's very possible to add discretionary language to the law, it's just that the US seems to be obsessed with making their jus…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 02:01 PM
9

Is everyone here against young people having sex? It's fairly common across the world to have one party above the age of consent and one below regardless of why the age of consent is set as. This is the entire reason so-called "Romeo and Juliet laws" exist. Having the cutoff at 3 years and the consenting "adult" be only 4 or even 5 years older being charged with a crime for consensual sex is not justice regardless of the gender being charged. It seems like so many people here are so outraged ove…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:58 AM
44

Attempting to ruin 15 lives should have gotten her life without parole.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:39 PM
4

The issue is that there's so many fucking rapists in the first place. The issue is deeply intertwined with Islam.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:31 AM
1

Murder rates already have been on a decline for decades.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:07 AM
9

This is the U.K. just in the event you didn't read the article. You guys have had ass backwards laws for quite awhile.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 04:04 PM
3

The point is that if a conviction isn't the standard of what we consider a rapist, then an allegation alone is all you need to have a man carry around the burden of being a sex offender on google the rest of his life. These men are probably going to have to change their names.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:51 PM
2

Haha is draft evasion really "drastic" if your country decided to force your hand with a deadly alternative? That seems like common sense to me. The complaints about this hypothetical are so fucking dramatic. Our government can't be bothered to fix anything, so it's pretty safe to assume revising meaningless sexist selective service registration from the 40s isn't even on their shortlist. At this point it's just another useless jobs program to give idiots paperwork to push around.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:09 AM
6

Just register then - you're not going to be the only one registered who hightails it out of the US if they ever did a draft.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:11 AM
-5

You can call it statutory rape but then your definition of all rape is tied to the legal standard of a country which may or may not have puritanical laws that, as written, are applied to men and women differently. A young man with a slightly younger girlfriend in certain jurisdictions is committing statutory rape every time they have consensual sex. There's no way I personably am ever calling consensual sex where the minimum age of a party is around 16+ (and it's impossible to give a specific nu…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 03:01 PM
18

You can't outsmart someone who arrived at a conclusion emotionally. These people are dumb enough to think a male CEO would continue to hire "equal" labour for 28% extra just because they have a penis. If that was the case, there'd be no incentive at all to ever hire a man and any company that employed more female labour would be massively more profitable.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:22 AM
1

I'm not arguing with you - just inferring why other people could have very easily been lead to believe she said that based on how it's written. It's not explicit either way and seemingly doesn't matter in the outcome.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:40 AM
0

It does says "[he] was under the impression she was 16"... I'm not sure how else he would be under that impression if not for her telling him.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:21 PM
0

Do you think the majority of Buddhist practitioners would approve or disapprove of what he said?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:58 PM
0

Western media has very much idealized Buddhist pacifism. Still, I guess what I'm getting at is that the deeper idea doesn't exactly seem congruent with the beliefs I've come to understand from many Buddhists I've run across traveling through Thailand, Bhutan, China, etc. At the end of the day if that teaching gives you fulfillment and improves your life, I'm not going to judge - all the better to you.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 03:27 AM
-1

What it boils down to is that he thinks people who are taken advantage of have it coming to them because they're unwilling to retaliate... His advice may have been helpful to you personally and others unwilling to help themselves but it seems like the deeper idea, if taken to the extreme you're suggesting that every action should provoke a reaction, is fundamentally not Buddhist at all.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:33 AM
0

It really goes without saying that speaking to any religion in a few sentences can't represent every possible interpretation.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:40 AM
0

Zen is a subset of Bhuddism. Bhudists believe in karma and anyone who believes in karma almost certainly doesn't advocate tit-for-tat. Look at Tibet's non-violent resistant to China.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:02 PM
2

Liberals will do anything to crate another cult of personality - they've had awhile to digest that Obama wasn't even close to their own expectations and that this might not be their year.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:23 PM
3

It's less about simple disagreement than the fact that there are people making pretty grand claims off personal anecdotes or not understanding the difference between average pay for a similar male and female and the average earned from all males and all females who made radically different lifestyle decisions.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:18 PM
0

More seriously than the other responses: I think modern virginity is considered consensual sex. I don't believe many actual virgin rape victims claim to have lost their virginity to their rapist.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:12 PM
1

So it would seem to make sense to have them all unisex then.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:31 PM
3

"But you can't say every actor that has at one point played Hitler is a neo-nazi. I haven't seen the commercial only disputing this point. In any case, if Tony Hawk didn't think McDonalds was ethical he would not have endorsed them. If Sarah Silverman didn't want to be associated with something that isn't her views then she shouldn't have accepted the commercial. I'm sure there are actors who will endorse anything for the right money but I think that's perhaps even more revealing of their charac…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:24 PM
2

That's a complete strawman since nobody with a brain would call Edward Norton a neo-nazi simply because he played a convincing one in American History X. If you play Hitler in a movie, there's not a single person who will assume you support Hitler's regime because for those two hours you're no longer Martin Wuttke - you're Adolf Hitler. If you're a big name actor, you have complete choice in the products you endorse and therefore they cannot be separated from your point of view. I remember in an…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:49 PM
2

There is - it's called perjury. There definitely are instances of women who have given false rape allegations that have been charged with it. It's hard to charge anyone with it though because it needs to follow the same standard as conviction of the rape itself and there is this toxic idea that it'll discourage actual claims if you prosecute the fake ones.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:03 PM
1

Asians don't really benefit from these programs... in fact, they're the race that's probably hindered most by our divergence from a true meritocracy. On average they're more qualified than everyone else but don't get the same diversity quotas and programs that inflate their status.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:55 AM
1

Basically if you're a middle-class or higher white heterosexual male that happens to be Christian and not use a wheelchair: you're public enemy number one.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:43 AM
3

They're literally was a big story today about a husband tracking his wife's phone messages and he got s ton of shit for it.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:06 PM
6

For fuck's sake these shitlords don't even ask these people (or other-kin) in fraternities if they identify as male.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:23 PM
1

Which you're not likely to get when you're around a group of people who are immune to polio - California's virus isn't polio by the way. I'm not advocating not getting shots and especially not vital ones for children - I'm just saying that children wouldn't be able to weigh what is necessary and what isn't... If it was up to many of them, they would would probably nope them all. As an adult you can opt of of medically recommended vaccines like the influenza shot (which only around 40% of people …
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:32 PM
1

I don't remember the shot... if it was a flu shot perhaps. Either way, I don't disagree with you. See my other comment below for the distinction I was making between giving children the ability consent and limiting parental control over decisions of these sorts. Hypothetically speaking if the child vocally wanted to be circumcised before it becomes a more dangerous/traumatic procedure (10+ according to the testimony) would you qualify that as consent? It's a harder question to answer but it seem…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:15 AM
-2

The vaccination really isn't necessary though especially in well-developed areas where they will likely be protected by herd immunity. Regardless, adults are free to choose what treatments they receive and many forgo having a yearly flu shot for example. I agree with you on the second portion but I don't think children should be given really any autonomy - rather guardians should be restricted on what they can do to their children. It's a subtle but very important difference.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:46 AM
-1

When I was four, I ran around my doctor's patient room not wanting to get a shot. There is a reason we don't give 4 year olds any independence... because they're generally very stupid. In this case, the child isn't weighing any pros and cons... that's what adults do and you're infusing your informed beliefs on the issue into a child. Parents and legal guardians are there to protect children's rights - when they don't, the kid is kind of shit out of luck. You should be arguing from a standpoint o…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:40 PM
4

the worst forms of it are the rarest. Source?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:29 PM
1

I think his point was not all Democrats are feminists rather than not all feminists are Democrats.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:01 PM
2

Ya liberals are generally culturally oversensitive about social issues - they don't like any group to get their feelings hurt and have a lot of internalized white guilt (assuming they're white).
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:00 PM
5

If there is ever a draft, some piece of paper I was forced to sign under duress isn't going to persuade me to fight for this country. The reason for eliminating things like this are more about the premise.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 04:19 AM
35

She has gotten more praise for this stupid UN speech than Bill Gates does for his charity that offers real value to the world so it's clearly not just a matter of money.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:24 AM
2

No, because all things cannot hold equal for such a large discrepancy in wages. The higher earner for instance might be earning more because they're a lot more involved in their work. The personalities of the same person growing up in different classes could be entirely different as well - the lower class person might be more appreciative of small things, willing to stay home and start a family, etc.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:52 AM
5

They'll simply reconstruct the definition to mean whatever they want it to mean: namely that only white males can oppress others. Extra points if they're straight, successful, fit, and educated.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:40 AM
4

...Let’s first define racism with this formula: Racism = racial prejudice + systemic institutional power. Saw this on my FB feed today... we have already apparently redefined racism as requiring institutional power.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:07 AM
-1

No, Barra is the sole successor to Akerson in GM's CEO position. Undoubtedly others will step up in during her adjustment but that's certainly not quantifiable as her doing "25% of the work".
/r/MensRights11/02/14 01:34 PM
3

I don't think there is anything in which 14 people that are experienced and trained for a job couldn't do the job better than a single person. This just shows how little you've thought about this. It's not a matter of more bodies equating to more output - it's an executive position where one decision-maker is necessary for the direction of the company. By your logic we should also have 14 presidents... but why stop there, if 14 is more efficient surely 100 presidents will be able to get much mor…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:04 PM
-3

Bunch of morons disagreeing with you. Women are simply more interested in teaching/working with children. This alone is unappealing as a chicken/egg problem where men probably don't have other men to relate to in a work environment filled with women... probably why in a lot of "girls club" professions you see a lot of gay men and in "boys club" professions you're more likely to see butch women. The cultural stereotype creates an additional barrier to entry for feminine women and masculine men as…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:22 AM
1

Young people don't view fighting for their country the same way they used to. If there was ever a draft, many of them would leave. This would negatively affect public opinion which are low already following our recent interventions.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:40 PM
1

Sociology isn't a science. Not only do those women have no inherent obligation to be partial but their positions naturally follow an incentive to stir up social issues when there may be none. Not only is there no such incentive pertaining to circumcision in medicine but there is far stricter standard of ethics.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:11 PM
0

Going skate boarding is not analogous to knowing whether you prefer having foreskin or not. I'm not making that indirect comparison though. To go with that example: looking at a skateboard (your baseline perception) is not a proper indication to knowing whether or not you enjoy riding a skateboard (actually having the experience). There's no denying that a correlation exists (admittedly a very strong one in the case of sexuality) but it's almost never hard set. "personal bias" and "experience"..…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:41 AM
0

I don't need to actually experience the situation to determine that it's not something I am interested in. Yet I claim I have no interest in an uncircumcised dick and you claim men wouldn't know they're preference unless it is experienced. Calling one a "personal bias" and another an "experience" is just semantics... you cannot logically hold both positions.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:36 AM
0

Yep doctor's in the US routinely manipulate studies to favour those deeply rooted traditions of theirs.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:31 AM
0

If you haven't had sex with a man - how do you know you don't prefer it? /s My preference is based on aesthetic so it wouldn't have changed. Sexually I wouldn't be able to know the alternative without commitng to it so I can only assume I would just stick with what I was given
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:13 AM
-1

Is it? That's a very simplified ethical framework of most of medicine - I didn't just come up with it. Just out of curiosity, what's the medical benefit of cutting off one's earlobes?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:10 AM
-10

Personally I prefer being circumcised though I certainly wouldn't be happy to have the procedure as an adult. The general population of men seem to not give a shit. I don't think there would be many females who would feel the same way...
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:09 AM
-8

For fuck's sake... there's a reason why the AAP approves of one and not the other. FGM increases risk of urinary and vaginal infection, cysts, complications during birth (assuming they can still give birth at all), etc. Reddit has a real hard-on for comparing the two because they both use the word "circumcision".
/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:26 AM
-8

I can see why you'd say that but it's a bit of black and white thinking - an "all criminals are equally terrible" mentality.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:09 AM
-9

Male circumcision arguably has health benefits. Even if you don't acknowledge the decreased risk of STDs (notably HIV) - you must acknowledge that there are no negative health implications when done correctly. Female circumcision has negative health implications even when done correctly. Same reasons? Maybe if you bundle both reasons as "cultural". Female circumcision is typically done for purposes of purity. Depending on the degree of said circumcisions - that woman may not be able to enjoy sex…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:59 AM
-9

Female circumcision is far more similar to castration than it is male circumcision. Is it ok to perform castration on males? (Hint: society has decided that the answer is no.)
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:11 AM
-17

Female circumcision and male circumcision are entirely different procedures performed for entirely different purposes. It's objective that female circumcision is far worse.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:07 AM
11

He should have answered these questions "incorrectly" or refused to answer unless they were changed to be gender neutral.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:12 PM
-1

Make a new sub - realbestof or openbestof or something.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 02:13 AM
1

Well the child would just end up being called Adolf or perhaps Dolf. Not that either are good names but I would hire a Dolf long before a Blue.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:26 PM
1

There are entire books written about the intricacies of these problems. How will roads be built? How would drugs be tested without the FDA? How do you hold corporations environmentally accountable without the EPA? How are any regulations created in the private market? How are laws enforced when there are multiple private police forces? If you understand the simple answer to such questions and are not satisfied, why are you still asking simple questions? Your understanding of "basic economics" is…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:15 AM
1

I don't have time to go into each of your misunderstandings about anarchism. They're simple answers that are commonly addressed in /r/anarchocapitalism or the like.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:12 AM
1

Anybody who understands any given industry understands why regulation is in everyone's best interest. Hail the state! Anyone with knowledge of a specific industry, given sufficient insight on the amount of regulations that exist, would be able to point out major regulations that need not exist or negatively impact the market. There are many logical premises for why anarchism would not work but "all regulations are necessary" certainly isn't one of them. You have to understand that many anarchist…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:29 PM
1

I can't attest to anything he's saying but anarchistic movements are usually just changing public systems to private systems. The creation and interactions between the specific domains like the police force and the courts would be equally abstracted away from the people outside those domains as it is now. The laws would not be any more "simple" though it's expected there would be far fewer laws because the market would demand fewer laws.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:17 AM
1

I'm sure the best sharpshooters will be men as well.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:52 AM
0

What form of anarchism? It certainty hasn't hijacked /r/anarchocapitalism
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:34 AM
3

Your links aren't working and I want to see what could have been
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:21 AM
3

That's unlikely if he did it with a small group of people and they walked though the necessary eggshells in their protest.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter