TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hexalby Archive

View 2 posts and 92 comments by hexalby on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
31

hexalby/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:59 AM
14

Edu./Occu.hexalby/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:31 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Oh is it controversial tosay that maybe people are not born wrong?
/r/ExRedPill26/09/22 06:21 AM
-1

You are inverting the causal chain. It's the red pill that identifies women as the issue. Men attracted to it are not sexist by nature, they simply have deep insecurities that society otherwise refuses to acknowledge or manage. I understand where you are coming from, but if you consider your statement a little deeper, then you are fucking yourself over. If these people are inherently sexist, then there is no solution other than an execution squad. Such an attitude will only multiply the number o…
/r/ExRedPill26/09/22 05:47 AM
7

Oh hey the worms have come out today.
/r/ExRedPill27/02/21 07:07 AM
2

I don't quite get your point.
/r/ExRedPill22/11/20 01:24 PM
5

Ask yourself what the obstacle was exactly. Women? Other men? Or a patriarchal culture that is used to keep the peasants in check? Making people desperate is not a bug, it's a feature. Desperation can be easily exploited.
/r/ExRedPill22/11/20 11:38 AM
5

As with most trp things, this attitude threatens to be a self filfilling prophecy. Not opening up and not trusting your partner is a surefire way to lose their trust and love.
/r/ExRedPill27/10/20 05:02 PM
4

No, it is not. This is an extremely reductive view, and I have a huge beef with twin studies, 90% are garbage. How do you exllain all the people that share tastes, behaviors, preferences background, et cetera but don't have a single gene in common? What about the twins that are not similar. That study does not present even a coherent theory, it's just an analysis that requires further study that may or may not lead anywhere. This narrative about genetic determinism is insane, and ideologically d…
/r/ExRedPill26/10/20 06:06 PM
7

They are very obviously false, my friend. And human psychology is far bmore complicated than a bunch of genes, not to mention the further complexity added by social structures.
/r/ExRedPill26/10/20 06:55 AM
8

Except they don't reflect reality at all?
/r/ExRedPill26/10/20 06:52 AM
16

The trp appears true because it built its ideology on self-fulfilling prophecies. It's a totalizing view of the world that leaves no possibility open, not even those that it sees as positive.
/r/ExRedPill13/10/20 06:17 AM
1

That's not a problem, do not punish yourself for wrongthink. Everyone has racist and sexist thoughts sometimes, everyone had a though once about killing someone or themselves. Everyone has regrets about how they treated someone or how they reacted to something. Thoughts are not evil, your emotions and feelings about them do not define you, it's what you do with them.
/r/ExRedPill12/10/20 07:55 AM
1

The first thing that must be said is that your present, your psychological situation, and your social situation are not the product of personal failings, or of inherent flaws embedded into your person; they are simply events and situations you are living and lived, no different than an accident while driving that changed the way you move because your knee has not quite returned in the right position yet. Nothing in our psychological life is ever written in stone, change can be made; it's not goi…
/r/ExRedPill12/10/20 06:12 AM
4

Yeah, no, it's a gulag for me.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 10:00 AM
5

Bold claim for someone dramatically short on sauce, you "barely bothering with a paper thin mask" fascist.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 06:09 AM
8

I mean, if you believe women are incapable, removing men from the picture is a sound tactic, if your objective is to destroy their livelihood. The fact that women are not failing without men must be quite frustrating for them. Is their worldview wrong? No, it must be some kind of conspiracy against men.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 06:05 AM
2

I am very disappointed by this thread. People that come to the trp are people that perceive that world as wrong. Telling them that all they need to do is to ignore the bells going off in their headis a surefire way of sending them back to the trp.
/r/ExRedPill19/12/19 07:24 AM
1

Or instead of putting your head under the sand, you can learn and decide withyou own head. You have listened to one side, now listen to the others: liberals, anarchists, and even communists. If you are questioning the society around you, then you realized that there is a problem. Would it really be that healthy to just ignore it?
/r/ExRedPill19/12/19 07:22 AM
1

What psychological tendencies? Why do people feel authorized to talk about psychology without knowing shit about it?
/r/ExRedPill19/12/19 07:17 AM
0

So essentially you are saying that we should not reflect on the nature of our society because that runs the risk of us adopting non-mainstream ideas. And the best thing to do to avoid this is to just shut up and go on with your life ignoring everything that happens around you? I don't even know where to start. Bad take bro.
/r/ExRedPill19/12/19 07:15 AM
2

No need to apologize. We are not here to judge your ideological correctness.
/r/ExRedPill14/11/19 03:37 PM
4

I would not agree on laying the blame so widely on feminism, feminist theory is nothing like the red-pill, at least for the most part.
/r/ExRedPill14/11/19 07:22 AM
5

It sort of dehumanizes everyone involved, though, doesn't it? What is the point of seeking a quantifiable form of love, if what we crave is exactly the non-quantifiable part?
/r/ExRedPill14/11/19 07:19 AM
3

The problem here is of culture. Neoliberalism commodified relationships to a degree that appearance is more important than substance. The ideal relationship is not felt or lived, it is photographed and posted on instagram. Thus for both men and women it is no longer acceptable to have a "good enough" life, that does not get you clicks, recognition, social acceptance. What you need is the best and only the best, and to do that you just need to filter out men under 6ft and women over 20. The fact …
/r/ExRedPill02/09/19 07:17 PM
19

(The following words are from my own experiencr. Don't take them as gospel, but as a starting point for your own reflections). An hard truth when it comes to having a positive experience dating is that before you can be comfortable with being in a relationship, you must be comfortable with being alone. The insecurity you feel stems from your fear or being without companionship, so the only way to cast it aside once and for all is to take the time to learn and live alone for a while. That way you…
/r/ExRedPill02/09/19 05:29 AM
3

Can you provide some examples?
/r/ExRedPill05/07/19 09:31 AM
8

He's integral part of the alt-right pipeline. He may not be a dangerous person by himselfbut he has proven time and time again that he is willing to implicitly support any idea that can make his popularity rise. It's no incident that hsi audience is mainly made up of alienated young white males, who incidentally are also the main demographic of the red-pill. As for why the rule is there, I don't know. It's possible the mods simply decided to close down discussions on him since the point of this …
/r/ExRedPill18/04/19 10:00 PM
5

By the way she has told me that she still wants to talk but just doesn’t want to meet up at the moment? This just makes me feel that she likes the attention she would get from me texting her but doesn’t want to actually meet? Or maybe she just feels a bit overwhelmed/wary but enjoyed your company so does not want to cut you off completely. There's nothing wrong with being pen friends for a while if it helps break the ice. And ehi, if it doesn't work at the very least you got a friend to talk to.
/r/ExRedPill15/04/19 03:15 PM
3

You should not put guilt on your shoulders like this. It is not a weakness of spirit that you came to believe this, as I said it is deeply embedded in us because it is one of the ways we interpret the world and build our perception of it. And it's not a process that just "snaps" into place one day, it is built slowly in time and requires the right environment and the right exposure to dehumanizing messages. This is actually the reason why so much of the left pushes for "policing" language (often…
/r/ExRedPill30/03/19 04:11 PM
3

Semantically, it is similar, but it's a deep ideological difference. The fact that you are differentiating them from the rest of humanity is a very easy step towards the complete dehumanization of women, which is the standard procedure used by pretty much every ideology that requires the oppression of a class of people: the native Americans were a problem for the colonizers, so the solution was to declare them inhuman savages without soul or god, so you could steal their land and property while …
/r/ExRedPill30/03/19 09:38 AM
3

TRP or not, there are plenty of women that would not mind using men, just like there are plenty of men who are more than eager to use women. The point of liberating yourself from the TRP is not to accept universally and unconditionally every human being, but something much more simple: Stop the dehumanization that the TRP requires to function. There are good and bad people, not good and bad women.
/r/ExRedPill30/03/19 08:43 AM
3

Not an argument and nothing to do with the conversation.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:20 PM
4

Good point, let me explain myself better. Identity emerges because of an underlying conflict, it's not a immanent property of a society. What I mean is that gender as an identity gains significance only whenever there is conflict between the social significance of female and male. There were no feminists in ancient Rome not because Roman women were fine with how things worked, but because the male-female social relationship was in an equilibrium, so there was no space for advancement. Modern fem…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 02:15 PM
8

I'll probably get some hate for this, but you are feeling on your skin how identity politics can go on both directions. Outside the ideological baggage those two words carry, at their core they mean having your chosen identity as the foundation of your being. We are not humans we are "women/men", "black/white", "hetero/homo", etc... The unfortunate truth is that there is little value that can be found in this post-modern trend of identifying so deeply to something externally determined. Of cours…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:26 AM
1

It would not be that different if all women stopped working for a day. The effects may be minor, but there would still be a crisis.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:58 PM
6

Have fun living in the economic crisis you just created.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:19 PM
16

Or we can find where the issue lies and solve it, but I guess that would leave no room for people to exploit each other so that's bad.
/r/ExRedPill16/11/17 06:56 AM
1

Are you fucking serious? A society built around workers' unions where the production is directed through the democratic process is somehow more government control? How do you define this "control", may I ask? Because at this point I doubt we have the same definition? And I'm sorry, but the Iphone was not magically born out of capitalism. All the technology inside it were separately created by universities and the military, both funded not by private citizens but the government. All the free mark…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 01:05 PM
1

You're confusing things here. There's nothing necessary about a state outside its primary purpose: the defense of private property, with this I mean the state uses its monopoly on violence to enforce the right of property on everyone. Anarchism as a movement has its roots in socialist political theory and rightly so, since it correctly recognize the elimination of private property would make the state obsolete. (and with private property I don't mean personal propery, but the means of production…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:47 AM
3

Well it's not surprising they're lamenting the loss. Just as a worker may see a robot as a threat to his livelihood so a woman may see an artificial womb as a threat.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:29 PM
1

oh no it's totally possible having anarchists believing in capitalism. Stupidity has no limits after all. But this is not the place to discuss this.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:09 PM
1

Oh yeah I misinterpreted your comment sorry. I was really confused for a minute there that someone would confuse ancaps for real anarchists.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:56 PM
3

That gal is an antiFa as much as I am the pope cosplaying as Mario. To me this seems so absurd I'm thinking that woman is a provocateur. That or an ignorant, ungrateful person.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:54 PM
2

ancaps are leftwing since when?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:50 PM
2

Not always. There's always situation where one trumps the other. In this case I can easily see why murder was considered the least of the two crimes: The guy used the child for 11years, it wasn't the heat of the moment or an inexperiemced kid not aware of consent and limits. It was a planned exploitation of a young mind unable to perceive the gravity of the situation. On the other hand the father acted on strong instinctual emotions. What father would not feel his duty to avenge his child?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 05:14 PM
3

What's a cultural marxist?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:57 PM
1

Yes I meant Chomsky. Congratulations on noticing my typo. Well you're free to think whatever you want really. I don't really care honestly.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 06:36 AM
2

So you'd prefer a world built around artificial scarcity rather than any type resource based production and distribution? Also funny you talk of the one Child policy here considering how disruptive it was for chinese men.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:05 AM
3

Birth rates is falling rapidly in all the world. In just 20 years the most fertile zones of Africa went from 7-8 to 5-6 children per woman. In all the western world and the far east we are far under replacements rates. Meanwhile we produce enough food to feed 10 billion People, even if we loose 20% of it we still have enough to feed everyone and more. And really to say that dealing with overpopulation with resources optimization is evil and wrong strikes me as extremely narrow minded and egoisti…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:53 AM
0

I don't agree on the environment. The major issue is how we produce things. Industries such as the meat industry are bloated monstrosities that waste incredible amounts of resources and pollute way more than humans. What we need is more rational ways to produce.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:34 AM
8

there's a subreddit for everyone banned by r/feminism. Bigger than the subreddit itself.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:27 AM
1

Oh really? And what type of anarchism you are referring to? Anarcho capitalism, anarcho syndacalism, anarcho communism, libertarian socialism or mutualism? Are you referring to Rothbar, Bakunin, Kropotkin, Malatesta, Goldman or Chonsky?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:18 AM
0

I'll say you're very good at dodging the point. The list was purposefully exagerrated to show how absurd the claims of communism crimes are, not to mention to show how little accountability is required to our system, but you skillfully dodged it! I'm not even gonna discuss what you wrote in this comment, you have zero awareness and refuse to see further than what was taught you. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:37 PM
-2

Ohhh a kilometric page written on a completely non biased site, with legitimate sources. Can you actually deny what I wrote? On the topic let me post a nice comment I found on capitalism deaths, calculated exactly as the deaths caused by capitalism: Unicef, Results and Bread for the World estimate that 15 million people die each year from preventable poverty, of whom 11 million are children under the age of five. (source) So in 10 years, capitalism kills more children under the age of 5 than soc…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:52 PM
-1

Do you even think about those numbers? They're absurd. You claim that Stalin alone killed 59 million people? The USSR population was 200 million when Stalin died, you think he killed a third of the population? Do you even realize how stupid does that sound? What country on Earth can survive loosing a third of its citizens and still defeat the German army? (Or still exist as a country at all) Oh and let's add the totally realistic number of 27 million dead by famines. So you think the Soviet Unio…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:06 PM
-2

How do you evaluate whether a societal structure works or not? By the number of countries that adopt it? If so why would have anyone adopted capitalism over feudalism, the whole known world used it and it worked like a charm. By the wealth accumulated by the countries that practice it? Then how did the Roman slavery system crumbled under the pressure of the migrating barbarians? Rome did amass incredible amount of wealth, you know? And practiced mass production a lot more than it is given credit…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:37 AM
-2

Which is why we have hundreds of books on socialist and anarchist theory and dozens of philosophers that dedicated their lives to it.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:34 AM
2

You're not alone. I've been banned from r/latestagecapitalism, r/socialism, r/FULLCOMMUNISM and r/shitliberalssay after the whole catgirl drama thing. It's not that bad though. They pushed me towards anarchism and I find myself much more attuned with it than their pseudo-stalinist bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:33 AM
2

It was never part of the far left to begin with. IdPol is just a fancy way for liberals to present themselves as champions of justice, while they are merely upholding the status quo.
/r/PussyPass04/03/17 08:11 AM
3

Far left here. Still hate IdPol.
/r/PussyPass04/03/17 07:58 AM
10

She may be just a Crusader Kings 2 LARPer. Jokes aside this photo is rather unconfortable.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:54 AM
1

What was that? The girl that drew the banner of r/socialism also draws this webocomic about political ideologies as catgirls. The mods somehow found that misogynistic and banned her. The sub rebelled and all kind of fuckery insued, mass banning for example of people trying to make things better, like me. :)
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:11 PM
2

I say socialism needs to stop To stop it needs to be implemented first. Socialism is not government welfare and neither state capitalism. It's workers control of the means of production.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:08 PM
2

core tenet of socialism (state control of production) You just triggered me! Jokes aside communism is a stateless society. State control of the industry is only a middle step towards the end goal. (A stateless classless moneyless society). If you want something closer to actual communism than the Soviet Union I suggest having a look at revolutionary Catalonia, which managed to implement an anarchist socialist society during the Spanish civil war. Another interesting example of socialist society …
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:06 PM
4

The same people that build them now...
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:21 PM
1

Well I agree that the political compass is a bit incomplete. It really does not take into account extreme views on both ends. But the orizontal axis represents economic left and right, on the left end you (should) have communism, on the other laissez faire capitalism. That said I agree with what you say as far as liberarism is concerned, although I would like to discuss what you mean with neo marxist thought.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:18 PM
1

Yeah I would support those. Actually as I wrote would dismantle the capitalist system, but as I said I did not mean to discuss politics here. We can do it if you want. I actually very enjoy it.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:14 PM
2

I wasn't trying to bring politics in the sub. I was simply curious to know where we stand here as political leaning go.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:03 PM
1

Oh I did not mean to give the discussion a political edge. I'm sorry if that was the impression. I was simply curious to know what is the general leaning of the sub. I agree men's rights can and should exist not bind to any ideology.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:02 PM
3

Careful or you'll be called a brocialist!
/r/MensRights31/01/17 01:23 PM
5

Then you've more or less scored close to Bernie Sanders, just to give a reference. You might be interested in exploring social democracy
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:53 AM
2

With which I wholeheartedly agree. Fuck tankies and fuck fascists.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:28 AM
2

It's important for me to be leftist. I'm not here to preach my ideas to anyone. I was just curious to see how much "left" there is here.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:24 AM
3

You can try the famous political compass test to see where you are. I personally scored -9.75 on the economic scale and -7.25 on the authoritarian/libertarian scale. So I am in the bottom left corner of the graph.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:00 AM
2

"Left and right" comes from the French revolution. That were the positions of the two opposing groups in the French parliament. On the right there were the representatives of the aristocracy and on the left the representatives of the bourgeoisie. In modern times they are used to define the political spectrum, putting more conservative views on the right and more progressive views on the left. It's difficult to give proper definitions because the current political climate inevitably changes them.…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:49 AM
2

Well some years ago I would have said the same thing, but now I have very different ideas. What I do have in common with this sub though is agreeing on how senseless IdPol is. There are actually a lot of us in the far left with a similar opinion.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:30 AM
1

the dick.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:40 AM
1

I can try to find relevant passages in Roman literature. It'll take me a while though. Would that be good enough?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:06 PM
1

Exactly. Thank you for adding this.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:04 PM
2

Well Said. Thank you for pointing this out.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:03 PM
1

You're not wrong but I feel I have to say that gender was really not so important in the lower classes, where as you say workforce was needed. In the upper class however the most important job for a woman was being a pawn in strategic political marriages. That said many women found ways to exert influence even from such position.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:52 PM
1

Absolutely true, but such punishment was not enforced by law. The father had the right to kill his daughter and his lover. It was not the law that arrested and executed the offenders. Also such punishments are rare or completely absent from historians records of the time. This probably means that capital punishment for adultery was probably rarely used.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:48 PM
1

I still don't see your point. Of course what I wrote is generic and limited, it would take books to do justice to the various points I listed, but my intention was to give a small window of the life in the Roman empire, not present a thesis. I added that little phrase for Cicero to make a totally ignorant person understand what kind of person Cicero was. Can you make a better summary in 15 words or less? Of course Cicero was not a right wing politician, it was meant to show where he would be tod…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:18 PM
1

I'm afraid I don't follow. What do you think I misrepresented?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:24 PM
2

The common woman yes, but the upper class women were far from powerless. As I mentioned in the post they held considerable economic power and could exert influence behind the scene.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:31 PM
1

I asked that surely atleast Elon ads something to mankind. Elon doesn't add shit to mankind, his engineers do.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:03 AM
16

Gotta ask... are you a troll? Youngish account with very kegative karma. Rarely answers. Spewing propaganda. If you are good job.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 12:10 PM
1

username checks out.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 12:05 PM
1

Brace yourselves Jokes aside well said.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 12:04 PM
1

That is more than reasonable
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:57 PM
2

You just demonstrated why it prevents brigading, with your own action, while also showing the big downside of such practice.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:22 PM
1

While I do agree to a certain extent with what you said, it is also true the situation is suspicious, after all he said he wasn't allowed a copy of the performance review that got him fired.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:19 PM
3

What is this "irony" you speak of?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter