TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hey2394 Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by hey2394 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We see many men willing to part with a lot of money for things like only fans Completely pathetic. that man who's not willing to part with 20$ for me - is he going to take care of me? I guess I understand that in a way but it doesn't follow logically. I've also never even heard of this angle and you're the first woman I've ever heard bring this up as a concern. The answer if the dude is normal is an obvious "yes, he obviously will care for his offspring". The reason dinner dates are cited more o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 01:29 PM
1

Yes, that's what I assumed it meant but wasn't sure if that was exactly it. I getcha
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 01:50 AM
0

I'm the other guy but what are you implying exactly with this analogy? I like where it's going but I don't see how this exactly lines up to what she said. Cuz the way I see it if 80-90% of women expected a fancy dinner date and didn't budge, men would be in the same situation of the inverse. Even if you like or not like the girl, you still have to drop +$100 on a first date and no matter what they'd have to do it. Is that what you were getting at?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 11:47 PM
2

Sorry if I came off a bit rough, you seem nice and open minded. I said they don't tend to randomly engage in traditional courting behaviours I agreed to that. I don't mean to just be an "incel" or a chud, I say this with utmost honesty and from observation: the current dating market (propped up my feminist ideas) does not reward this type of traditional courting AT ALL. It actually punishes "nice" dudes by trying to go old school by either getting friend zoned, ghosted or fleeced by girls who ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 11:37 PM
1

So your answer is literally "no u"? Let me get this straight: I've been harping on the "men do bring value" angle for a while (which means I'm one of those males in the sub you mentioned) and now suddenly you weren't addressing me in that? Right lol Holy backpedaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 07:28 PM
2

What do you mean it's naive? Do you think I'm gonna take a random chick who might or might not be worth shit on a dinner date on my dime and time? If anything it's the opposite of naïve and borderline jaded. My gf of 7 years and I went out for a walk in the old town for a first date and had coffee on the second. She's gotten plenty of fancy dinner dates since then and I do it from the heart. It might be hard for you to comprehend since you seem to assume every man is a piece of shit from the get…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 07:21 PM
2

It doesn't necessarily mean one is terminally online. There's really no space in real life where you can talk shit about this so where else WOULD you share such an experience? 95% of guys are turbo-simps who would balk at the idea of holding women accountable or holding them to a standard. You're trying to rationalize the fact that tens of thousands of men have experiences that line up almost perfectly and they have clocked a pattern with "oh they're just heckin incels!!".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 03:16 PM
2

Imagine living in 2026 and still expecting women to be consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 03:10 PM
5

Never ever ever ever EVER invite a girl on a dinner date for the first date. Invite her to something you were going to do anyways that was fun. Dinner dates are for girlfriends or for girls you're quite certain you want to take seriously in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 03:06 PM
0

The males in this sub are saying that males built the world without women doing anything so we aren’t entitled to live in this society, or do it is implied Whenever I hear about how reading comprehension is at an all time low I don't even understand how that's possible until I read shit like this. Nobody said women haven't done anything. They give birth so they're literally the ones who bring forth life and in the past were involved in raising the children and educating the next generation. That…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 02:59 PM
0

Do all women just make shit up? Literally when was this said even once? Can your brain not think of anything other than ALL or NOTHING?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 05:08 PM
1

That's... not what I said. Never mind the home run thing, I was kinda including the date itself. Even with that it still stands. Edit: Actually, I got confused. Scratch that. Yes, I was referring to sleeping with the gal. What I meant is that I don't regard it as an "automatic lay". But you're right, that's a fair distinction and I kinda baked them both into the pot. A date =/= a lay. However, the odds are still not 1 in 2 for dates, anyways. Not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 02:19 PM
1

I'm not saying it's impossible. Even a super hypergamous woman is picky by definition. But come on. 1 in 2 men approaching a girl hits a home run with a particular girl? Yeah right lol I don't think I've ever seen that in my life. Think about it. If she got approached 30 times a year, that would mean she got 15 additional bodies. I guess it could happen but I really doubt it. I'm counting EVERY approach here. Whether a dude "casually" chatting her up at the grocery, a bar, etc. Now, 10 dudes app…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 01:02 PM
1

The female genius proving every single stereotype available lol keep 'em coming, man, this shit's great.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 11:35 PM
2

Notice how the NPC cattle literally just copies word for word what I do. Bonus point for petty insult. Keep going, you're really disproving the stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 07:29 PM
2

Notice how the NPC chick cannot make an argument and so resorts to the same thing literally every other chick does.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 04:01 PM
1

Is first grade math your highest qualification? Yes. Graduated with full marks, baby. Errr that’s based on the assumption that it’s 10 undesirable men. Yes but with the caveat that it was undesirable to you or whomever in that moment for whatever reason. Which can happen for whatever reason like vibes, grooming, bad timing, etc. 10 men approach me, 5 are attractive and seem great. I get 5 dates. I approach 1 cute guy, I get 1 date. 5 >1 (> this means 5 is more than 1 btw) And oh, I get the 5 fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 03:47 PM
1

You took first grade math, right? Let me take you by the hand. 10 men approach a woman. She dislikes the 10 men because of an ick or whatever. 0 dates or significant others. 1 woman approaches a guy she actually likes. He's single and says, "nice! A woman that's straight up!" 1 date or possible significant other. 0 < 1. (<- this means that 0 is less than 1) Good job. Btw, I'm not making any sort of illusion. I don't care either way whether women approach or not (they won't) and men will have to …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:38 AM
1

Lol I know right? These girls will really twist themselves in knots to not admit they're wrong or that they misspoke.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:34 AM
1

Nobody took it as ALL men/women. This is your own bad critical thinking skills projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:33 AM
1

In debate subs like this, it’s generally understood that people are referring to a specific subset based on context unless they explicitly say otherwise. It shouldn’t be necessary to tack on disclaimers like “not all men” or “some women” to every single comment. I quote: "What value do you bring to a woman’s life that she couldn’t get from a friend or family member?" Let's use context clues like you did in third grade. The previous discussion was claiming that "Men seem to have trouble understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:32 AM
1

Yeah, I know. Of course their success rate is still high if any guy that wants a whiff will approach and a girl can choose at that point (although if a guy knows what he's doing, he's the one doing the choosing ;)). You were originally talking about how we "gaslight" you into thinking it's a benefit for you and I tangibly showed how it would.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:25 AM
3

Women provide value to men precisely through the unpaid work they do (like cooking and cleaning) even though they have a full-time job. Are you typing with a straight face that modern women are cooking and cleaning for their men as he gets home from work? Thanks for the laugh. Are women in relationships paid to have dissappointing sex with men, where they receive little to no pleasure in return? This is just another form of unpaid work by women, where women provide lots of value to men for free,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:19 AM
2

We've been over this. They are paid for this as part of their jobs. This isn't a gotcha. What does them getting paid have to do with the value they provide? Whether a man got paid or not to build something of use does not make that any less valuable. It's like saying doctors saving lives aren't providing value because they're getting paid. Absurd argument. These are niche, highly specific situations The niche highly specific situation of the fact that EVERYTHING built around you was more than li…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:12 AM
2

Rule #1 of the Most Predictable Basic Chick: when the argument cannot be refuted just imply the other man cannot date, have sex or call them an incel instead of actually trying to make a point. You guys are so programmed it's not even funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 01:54 AM
1

Nice gotcha. Notice how I said "repeat data" not "posted". I usually regret chewing up the data and giving it to other redditors on a plate because they'll always find a way to rationalize it but if I feel like it I'll share it one of these days. Leave me a comment to remind me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 01:47 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 01:45 AM
3

Lol smug gif with no argument at all. Reason #1000000 for why women should not be part of the public discourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:18 AM
3

Because John from down the street is a fireman, all men can claim they are also firefighters? Literally quote any single place I said this. So the only way men can articulate their value is by stealing the valor of the men before them. Quote it. By your reasoning, all women should stop doing childcare and chores for men, because some woman did it in the past, therefore all women can claim they did it. Except that they're not doing it. Where the hell are there women doing chores willingly for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:15 AM
2

...when did I say otherwise? I'm just making the point that if women chose to approach, the success rate would be much higher. It's 100% a pipe dream as I don't think women will ever change their approach, so to speak. You can guide a horse to water, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:12 AM
1

Of which they are paid for. Men aren't doing this out of the goodness of their own hearts. Irrelevant and doesn't really refute what I said. Whether or not it's out of the. "goodness of their hearts" (fucking lol) or because they're getting paid doesn't change the value exchanged, Are these men going to fix my internet and build me a kitchen if l start dating them? First of all, they do exist which funny enough jsut proves the point these dudes are invisible to you. Second, if men knew they woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:09 AM
2

That's a "sneaky" question that tries to be more cynical than you'd like to think it is. But I'll give you something even more cynical. The fact is that by proxy, men 110% provide value nonstop into your life every single day. If you were to point at me or whatever other dude at random and go "that chud doesn't provide any value" I guess you'd be right if we're using your myopic view of whatever the hell "value" means to a woman, as it is rare that any one random individual has any sort of input…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:59 PM
-1

The value is internet, utilities, infrastructure, roads, farming, logistics, oil rigs for the gas for your cute little car, the cars themselves, plumbing, construction... I could go on and on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:37 PM
1

I always laugh at these types of comments. Not only because 1. I'm 100% you'll fall over yourself when a dude who activates your tingles comes along (assuming you're straight) and 2. and most importantly, the fact that you're even able to type that boss babe comment with working electricity, internet, computer, roof above your head, etc. was all because of men. You don't have to approach men. But bro, at least get real lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:26 PM
1

It depends. If you're decent looking and want a guaranteed 95% success rate with getting a dude, then approaching is in your best interest. If you just wanna lay back and hope a dude approaches then that's a separate and optional strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:24 PM
6

This is you not being able accept that women around you don't want you. Lol is it part of the basic bitch manual to always end a comment with a jab? Never fails. It's always some variation of, "uhmm you can't get wet holes so you're a loser". So predictable at this point. Yes I'm aware it says "man" on your flare.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:09 PM
1

They're not necessarily lazy (although if you've ever heard how women talk about their jobs it wouldn't be a farfetched conclusion) it's just not in their wiring. Unless the dude is super famous or something like that, it's such a coin flip for a girl that it's very unlikely they'll make the first move. But it is true it would have an almost 100% success rate if women approached the guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:06 PM
1

Do I need to go to medical school to repeat data?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:01 PM
1

Obviously I'm focusing on men as that was my whole point from the beginning and refuting the argument the original commenter made about old sperm and whatnot. So obviously, it goes without saying that women incur a very heavy risk and, again, I never said otherwise. What the hell are you even talking about making the decision process 50/50? Not even sure what that has to do with my point. Again, I never said don't get optimal sperm nor that it's optimal for a 60 year old dude to impregnate rando…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 03:56 PM
1

How is it solipsistic to state a fact? It is what it is. On average, women by around age 35 present much higher risk in pregnancies. Men's deterioration is a much gradual process and by 45 or 50 they begin to be more outright risks. That's a 10-15 year difference. Like, you call me solipsistic and yet you somehow made the conversation into "a woman don't need to sacrifice her best interests" when I never said otherwise lol I specifically said it's much better if young are with young which you co…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 06:44 PM
1

Yeah, never mind. Either you're not understanding or you're going in circles on purpose to not acknowledge what I'm saying. I addressed and clarified the "asshole" part pretty clearly and I don't know how to make that any simpler.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 05:13 PM
1

Is the hot guy complimenting every woman in the office, or just the ones he finds attractive? What does this have to do with anything? Obviously just the ones he finds attractive otherwise why give the compliment in the first place? Now you’ve switched to workplace harassment complaints. I can't tell whether you're being difficult on purpose. Obviously, it always had to do with workplace harassment or at the very least, the general reaction women give to this type of thing. What else could that …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 05:10 PM
1

You’re acting like if I wanted pizza on Tuesday, I have to eat pizza every Tuesday for the rest of my life. Show me one instance where I say that because you do one thing one day, you have to do it every day. I'm not even sure what your point is here because I never brought this up. I'm just using the standard (sorry for the redundancy) definition of "standard". Whether or not you accept it and just want to hyper fixate on one niche of it to suit your argument, sure. However, from the outside, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:07 PM
1

It doesn't seem like it seeing as women pick the worst candidates ever. But fair enough, I guess. My point was more that if a guy goes more into the asshole spectrum your success will more than likely go way up than just being nice. Your trying to paint it as "the randomness of life" but there must be something going on besides that if there's such a consistent trend in this regard. If good and awful men can both struggle equally according to you then there must be some common denominator for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:00 PM
2

I've never heard of any man reporting to HR or shouting harassment for receiving a compliment from a below average girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:53 PM
1

The funniest part is that you don't realize you're arguing my point for me. What's more, notice how you didn't even acknowledge how the other dude (the one waiting for 5 dates) would've looked at this situation. This isn't rocket science and I don't even understand why this is such a hot button topic for you. Those hundreds of reasons you pointed out? Those are standards. If she decided one day to let a dude be with her and then another day for another dude decided that he would have to wait a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:51 PM
1

You’re acting like it’s a different standard when it’s just a different person. Let's make it super simple. In order for you to pick a men to sleep with you HAVE to have some sort of standard. You just have to. Otherwise, every single men that has ever approached you would have slept with you. I highly doubt this is the case for you so you're applying some type of standard to say, "Okay, this man is NOT going to be with me." when you reject a dude. So my question to you is... why would the perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:51 PM
2

So... you agree with the strip.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:22 PM
1

When I say asshole I don't mean beating the shit out of them or cussing them out. Obviously, when I say "asshole" I'm more referring to a more general carefree edge, which can sometimes make you look or sound cocky (hence why I used the word asshole). If you tease women and don't take them seriously in a playful way, one of the most common proxy compliments you'll get is "You're such an asshole!" as they smile. It doesn't mean that the men are scum. Now take that to its extreme. Are "awful" men …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:21 PM
2

It's nowhere near the same but I know you won't concede. In fact, it's so skewed that women will spend years with a male "friend" and be shocked that they want to have sex with them. They can't even conceive that a man they are not attracted to would want to have sex with them. Thus, they are invisible as far as attractiveness goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:12 PM
1

I was just making the point that's it's not as dramatic as women like to make it out. I agree it's better if both men and women in their prime are having kids. But a 40 yo man having kids is normal in some ways. Put it differently, if I had to choose between older men or older women having kids with their inverse of the younger gender, I'd pick men. Much less of a chance of the kid coming out with certain problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:09 PM
2

Pretty much this but trying to lay out a nuanced point to a woman is like pulling teeth.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:32 AM
2

Then goddamn, even the normal, chill girls are fickle and fake too cuz I've seen it with EVERY type of women across the board and I'd bet a lot saying it's the majority of them. It doesn't matter if they're trashy or tradcons, this pattern is so common most men nowadays aren't even fazed or surprised by this. Girls like bad boys. Sue them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:29 AM
4

Yes there were plenty of people that said that. From childhood to adulthood it's been constantly spewed at us by teachers, parents, movies, other girls, dating podcasts... Like, are you being disingenuous or what? I'm not trying to be condescending but that's ALL we heard growing up as boys(and to some extent, still do). Hell, I'm not even sure male feminists could disagree with this, though, who knows with them. It's only the last half decade maybe where we have insane chicks going on podcasts …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:25 AM
1

Man, I thought genuine incels (I'm talking about the blackpilled dudes) were sad, this is a whole different level. You legitimately think talking honestly about dating and attraction is "sociopathic" and that we'd hit women if we weren't timid. Good luck, for real.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:15 AM
3

Most women have never said they’re attracted to morality. This made me lol. That's pretty much what we've heard all our lives. Be nice, be giving, be sweet, do this for her, do that for her, don't be like those player assholes, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:12 AM

Damn. This should be framed as Cope: The Comment in the sticky. Not only did you not even engage with the other dude's points you outright made up claims he made. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:08 AM
1

Usually after either getting put in their place by them or after getting pumped and dumped.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:05 AM
1

I've met so many dudes in my life I've lost count. Not ONE dude has ever expressed this. In fact, it's actually the opposite lol the dudes that don't take shit from their girls and are absolute assholes are the ones that boast about it. Most non-abusers (i.e. 99% of men) are just living normally.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:04 AM
-1

Mmm this is true but not to the extent most women would like to believe. Old sperm does lower in "quality", yes, but a 50 year old man having a baby with a 20 year old will come out way healthier and, for lack of a better word, normal than a 20 year old guy with even a 40 year old gal. I do agree that the best is if we just start fucking at 18 and have families young but to say that it is poor quality sperm sounds like cope. Older men can have babies with younger women who come out just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 01:01 AM
1

damn, where do you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 12:57 AM
1

That would imply that women on average have reasonable expectations. Sadly, I haven't seen that in my 30 years on this earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 12:54 AM
1

So a clock is a clock? Saying that the sexually unsuccessful men are ones that are not desired is a circular argument unless you just had a Freudian slip and pretty much conceded the whole red pill argument. Yes, I agree, if a girl knows you get no play (even if you are amazingly "nice") she will view you very differently and not in a good way.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 12:53 AM
3

Implying unattractive men are not invisible to women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 12:49 AM
5

Genuine question: how do you explain the tens of thousands upon thousands of men who have gotten success with women by changing their approach and being a bit more of an "asshole"? Are all those guys just a fluke or might there be some truth there that is a bit uncomfortable?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 12:48 AM
3

It's not a peer reviewed study but it should get you thinking that literally 90% of guys will look at that comic and go "yeah, I've seen that happen." But of course, 90% of men are biased incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 12:47 AM
2

This doesn't make sense. If the woman decides to sleep with one guy in the first date but not another guy, she's putting up some sort of standard to which compare one guy to the other. Women mold their standards depending which guy it is all the time. Inb4 "not this girl!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 12:45 AM
2

This is pretty much part of the human condition.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 11:42 PM
1

People are allowed to critique or question whatever approach you use. Though, I don't know which comments you are referring to exactly but everybody's a critic. It is what it is
/r/TheRedPill16/05/24 11:20 PM

noooo you can't not say anything that isn't absolutely worshipping the hecking TRP commandments!! anything that slightly critiques the grandpappies of le heckin Senior Endorsers is wrongthink and will get you banned Like clockwork and truly ironic. Reddit really is the death of free discussion, no matter how ""controversial"" a sub is (and I use that term very loosely). This sub has been going in the tank for a long time, btw, and I couldn't even enter here until I made a new account because of …
/r/TheRedPill16/05/24 11:17 PM
5

Exhibit #5499 of why feminism is a failure. The internet ruined it all, too, in the sense that the cat's outta the bag with hypergamy. Funny enough, the less a girl uses social media (and not that she stopped using it after years of getting attention but that she has almost never used it in her life) the more stable she is. That being said, in general, they're not built to be independent in the same way you and I are. This is what happens when they don't have a man they respect and essentially h…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/24 10:58 PM
1

It may sound like an odd recommendation but The Brothers Karamazov I think is good philosophical fiction on why it's good to cling unto hope in a debased world. Also, A Confession by Leo Tolstoy is also a great essay on rejecting nihilism completely despite its draw.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 07:33 PM
1

I could see myself going monk mode but having a family is a very big goal for me. Godsoeed to you, man
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 07:27 PM
2

And I can respect that. Funny enough, the more you go into introspection and search for truth, imo, it's more likely you will come to a solid sense of right and wrong and realize how much of a superficial bandaid a lot of these solutions are. I understand, OP. I really do. I would love a family. But as much as I know that it is an injustice that men are in such a state nowadays, it can be disheartening to see that most people just don't care. The most I found I can do is to lead by example and i…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 07:16 PM
2

Gotcha. Well, it depends. If you're not religious or spiritual in any way, I don't see the point of that, tbh. The most logical argument I can think of is that a girl that will stay by your side through thick and thin is worth 100 instathots. Stability, support and history can go a long way, imo. That's why I said that context and history matters when you talk about meeting girls
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 07:10 PM
1

Let them come in so that they can at least see what men are saying honestly. It might hurt their fee fees but deep down they know they've been found out and that the clock is ticking
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 07:03 PM
1

The easy, cynical answer is "Enjoy the decline, brah!". The hard, positive answer is try to build a better future for your kids or the rest of society later on. If you want to keep accelerating society even deeper into its sinkhole, then by all means keep running through girls. Choose your poison, I would say, but the easy answer I guarantee will not feel fulfilling aside from the short term cooming. The fact of the matter is TRP is only depressing because you're looking at the state of society …
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 06:53 PM
1

Then i don't understand what your complaint or point of the post is. Either keep banging away or stop
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 06:40 PM
1

If you find your girls through Raya, don't complain when they're not wanting to make it past "that level". The fact of the matter is, where you meet your girls matters. A girl on Raya isn't going to be the same as a girl from an orthodox church, for example. Not saying you should go to church (although, I highly recommend it) but vet your girls better. This is your fault, girls will be girls.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/24 09:36 PM
2

At the end of the day, you really don't know if she did or not. However, the fact that she left you hanging like that considering the circumstances is more than a red flag. Here's a few things you could do: With 0 judgement or emotion, place your boundary that you did not like what she did and explain to her why. If she gets super, super defensive, I would wager she either went with the intention of cheating or she did. I don't know how you set the expectations with your girl in terms of logisti…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/23 08:49 PM
1

heh, you fell into my trap. You asking a question actually proves my point, dude. Check mate Sure, dude. Just say you don't wanna answer the question. But never mind that, I'm genuinely curious: what was the point you were trying to make, then? ​ Edit: Quit ghost editing your comments. Don't know what ghost editing is but I haven't edited any of my comments.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 06:12 PM
1

Obviously, hedonism implies that you're indulging in pleasures rather than just casually doing it. Typing "lmao" and pointing out what I did is not an argument. You still haven't answered my question. What other benefit do you get from actively participating in hookup culture other than pleasure? How does that solve the shit we're supposed to be fighting against as men?
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 02:19 PM
2

Hedonism: n. the pursuit of pleasure; sensual self-indulgence. What other benefit do you get from hookup culture other than pleasure?
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 07:17 AM
1

Unironically, God is the answer to all of your questions. God bless, man.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 06:40 AM
2

Agree 100%. TRP has some useful stuff but for the most part it literally just plays into the shitty hand hyperliberalism has given the people this generation. If anything, it makes me even more depressed, that feminists hold more cultural power than "the real men". No wonder, if the roll over and die the moment things aren't looking up. "I can't change the world". But apparently the blue haired land whale HR manager and her friends can? Yeah, I am feeling very redpilled right about now. Couldn't…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 06:29 AM
2

And that's the part I fucking hate in your argument. You're basically saying that a woman will save you from the pain and anguish of women . She won't! Sorry, but she won't! That's a very nice fairytale, the idea that a woman will come along who is perfect and not like the others, until she is like the others and breaks you. Wanted to add: the other user never said this. The point he was making is that this doomer zeitgeist is just feeding into the shitshow feminism has created, which is true. A…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 06:24 AM
2

You're coming from the position that you can't determine whether a girl is worthy of your time unless you fuck her. That's insane. You can tell 90% of the time whether a girl is worth your time within the first few dates, if not the first date. Knowing what questions to ask, how to frame yourself so that she doesn't feel judged so that she answers truthfully, etc. are tools you use to vet the crazies from the normals and on top of that from the top 1%. Sex is icing on the cake. If you need to ba…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 06:21 AM
2

I get what you're saying but if you just feed into hookup culture, you're being just as hedonistic as they are.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 06:12 AM
1

If you despise the concept of ONS, etc. then don't do it. I don't understand this whole thing where you HAVE to fuck as many girls as possible. You don't need to bang thots to know if a gal is worthy of a relationship or not. A nice girl will be nice and a shitty girl will be shitty, whether you run through girls or not. You can still do other RP stuff that can be genuinely productive. Gym, health, social skills, etc. There's literally no other win with casual sex other than feeling good on your…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/23 06:10 AM
1

Nice try, Myron. I ain't buying your book
/r/TheRedPill26/09/23 11:07 PM
2

Imagine thinking three girls is low experience. What works for one girl will work for every girl; they're all the same. Always be confident and you'll realize how dumb it is to be worried about this.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/23 11:02 PM
2

Level up,homie. If all you find and attract are goblina femcels you're doing something very wrong
/r/TheRedPill30/08/23 12:43 AM
1

That's what I thought, too, fam, and for a lot of things it is. Especially in terms of honest discussions about female nature. Though, surprisingly the mods's reaction to this post have been quite lax but I think it's because there hasn't been that much "controversial" discussion
/r/TheRedPill15/05/23 08:30 PM
2

So where are the TRP users who do want to be good husbands and fathers and find a woman who is worth spending your life with? They're either banned (I wish I was kidding) or mocked. But trust me, there's a good % of men here that care about morals and values. There's been several posts throughout the year talking about just this and it always gets support from men.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/23 08:40 PM
2

I've thought this, too. I've been thinking WW3 is either gonna be the end or the beginning of something worse
/r/TheRedPill12/05/23 08:34 PM
1

Which is why I am the best writer here. Had a good laugh at this one. The Court Jester, indeed.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/23 08:26 PM
2

That's a tale as old as time. Reddit mods (and mods in general, but especially Reddit) are notorious for being pathetic power tripping bullies. They can ban you at the snap of a finger so why have a rational discussion with you? I've also been banned two times from TRP and I wouldn't be surprised if they banned me now without TRPCops making it known because I've had that done to me. I've also talked to other dudes who were banned without any reason other than "you know what you did." So yes, I'v…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/23 08:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter