hgg99ggh Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	If you are a Feminist, and you've come here to tell us that "RadFems don't represent Feminism" please read this. My argument would be that its a feedback loop. Like the snake eating its own tail, with humanity as the snake. Frankly, I wouldn't want to be a big name MRA either. I don't want to fight the world, I want a chance at happiness, at peace, and at love. I tend to be quite sensitive to things I hear - I'm the sort of person that feels sad when I read sad words, and when I look around at the world I inhabit, I don't see peace, I don't see happiness, and I don't see love. I don't want to be the footso…	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 11:38 PM
-5	Release to the World Its so good to see you laugh! When you lost your job, I was convinced laughter would never grace our home again.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 10:49 PM
1	If you are a Feminist, and you've come here to tell us that "RadFems don't represent Feminism" please read this. And I have come here to tell you that those women do not represent me. I thought that was readily apparent. So much for mutual understanding.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 10:47 PM
-5	Release to the World Whats wrong, bro - don't like blanket assumptions about what you're capable of on the basis of group association? Even when you provide a denial? That must really be terrible.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 10:45 PM
2	If you are a Feminist, and you've come here to tell us that "RadFems don't represent Feminism" please read this. I understand. I appreciate your saying this. However, its quite personal, and I think thats an important part of it. This is your feminism, and I absolutely urge you to cherish it and nurture it. And compassion, always compassion! Feminists need to understand that telling some people to accept feminism without extreme skepticism is like telling someone who is afraid of dogs to take your pitbull for a walk all by themselves. The default reaction cannot be to simply tell us to get over it. We all …	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 10:36 PM
-7	Release to the World Seriously! But not as cool as your name, and what you do!	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 10:27 PM
-5	Release to the World LOL. You'll understand if I don't take your word for it. You're all potential doxers! LOL! Shroedinger's doxer, if you will.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 10:09 PM
-6	Release to the World Whats really amusing is your spin on this. Definitely show your loyalties. Oh, and say hi to your SRS buddies! You guys are all super smart, and clearly know whats right and wrong, all the time. I'm just sad our time couldn't have been longer.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 10:06 PM
-14	Release to the World You can't answer them, thats why. You think its wrong because you don't like who is doing it. You would dox someone right away if it suited your purposes. Also - how is the internet not real life? If someone has an inbox full of hateful messages telling them they're shit, does this not affect them in real life? Are the real world effects of the things people on the internet say not the bread and fucking butter of SRS?	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 09:50 PM
-13	Release to the World You should have just quoted your original post. Saying "they're just different" is not an argument with any merit, and frankly, it sounds as if you agree with them.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 09:39 PM
-33	Release to the World Are names private? Are places of employ? Are public figures ever held responsible for things that they do in private? Are you advocating what these people would like to do?	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 09:25 PM
-13	Release to the World Oh really? Its totally different? I will ask again, have people on manboobz been harassed? Have any of them experienced real world consequences as a result of manboobz attention? Have any of them been "outed"? If the answer is yes, then may I suggest a closer examination of the relevancy of my point. Lets start here: what, specifically, is wrong about making an effort to link an online identity to a real life one? do we honestly have a right to anonymity? Do we have a right to anonymity if we pl…	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 09:10 PM
9	If you are a Feminist, and you've come here to tell us that "RadFems don't represent Feminism" please read this. I dont deny any of this. However: It was so imbedded in society that women were less Do you think that the men don't experience the gender opposite of this? Do you honestly not see how this is part of the human experience? We are all less to someone, sometimes overtly, sometimes not. I am not calling into question your feelings on this. This is my truth, and the pain is real. I wouldn't be here if it weren't. We don't need gender based solutions, we need to be fucking humane to each other.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 08:57 PM
-23	Release to the World 7 upvotes in 16 minutes on a second page thread. How interesting! Wonder where you're getting all of your internet points? Would you dox a pedophile? Would you dox a pedophile who posted about his plans to molest children online? How is contacting someones employer more criminal than plotting genocide? are you seriously going to try and sell that shit to me? Or perhaps, are you reading "the violence between the lines", the way people like you are so fond of doing? Theres nothing illegal about kn…	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 08:53 PM
7	If you are a Feminist, and you've come here to tell us that "RadFems don't represent Feminism" please read this. This is an understandable response - however, how do you deal with it when people like Mr. Dorkins here do exactly this? For example, when people purposefully conflate a skeptical attitude towards feminism with extremism? It is done all of the time, which may not make this situation right. But let me tell you, I have no sympathy for these women, or for feminism as a whole. Radfems are their frankenstein. Its their monster, a sickness born of feminist culture. Just as one cannot say that all femi…	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 08:28 PM
-26	Release to the World Nope - his fact is true. You can see the quoted text on the many blogs. She ( Tiptree ) has a clear idea: specifically, eliminating the ability of the y chromosome to reproduce, preventing the conception of male children. She goes on to suggest that the male population will be eliminated within 2 generations. She aludes to it openly on some of the public forums, then elaborates on the idea in private. And in the released posts, at least one forum-goer openly agreed. I wonder how many of those po…	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 08:05 PM
-41	Release to the World What you are doing is horrible. Sorry, no. Real life has consequences, right? If an MRA posted a plan, even general, on a forum, public or private, that advocated the mass murder of women, would you have a problem identifying him to the world, and possibly going to their employer? If any of these people are in positions of government power, don't the people they purport to represent have a right to make an informed decision about that representation based upon such evidence? If any of these peop…	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 07:55 PM
-45	Release to the World So do feminists. Take for example, photographing people who patronize adult bookstores. On a smaller scale, there are SRS regulars like you, dropping in and threadshitting. Is it harassment? By definition, yes. Not to mention SRS as a larger entity. And you don't agree with whats posted here. So, I guess its nice to know that you, Archythearchivist, actually advocate the harassment of people who disagree.	/r/MensRights	16/12/11 07:35 PM