TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hhhhhhhhhhhjf Archive

View 1 post and 127 comments by hhhhhhhhhhhjf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
122

social mediahhhhhhhhhhhjf/r/EverydayMisandry29/10/24 11:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You gonna delete this now or..?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/26 07:51 PM
8

Then at least the word means "equality" not "women" and it has no historical connection to a single gender's struggles. That's a lot harder to co-opt.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 02:03 AM
9

All people should move away from "feminism." It's been taken over by bad actors and hasn't been about real equality in a long time. The name itself is a call to misandrists that only care about women. Someone that cares about real equality would be an egalitarian.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 01:44 AM
11

Never said it was. It definitely isn't about true equality though. There is way too little work done for men and too much support for shitty women for feminism to care about men. Those radical feminists are still feminists though because terms evolve. The movement is no longer exclusive for those types of people.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 01:31 AM
19

Radical feminist They are still a feminist whether you like it or not.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 12:02 AM
2

Sleeping with her because she basically forces him to. Did you miss the "Stay!" scene? "Finally" agree despite me starting this off by saying that Bear is a bad person. You just refuse to listen. I haven't defended Bear's actions as if he was a good person. I have explained how this bad person can still be a victim that isn't as terrible as everyone says.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/26 09:28 AM
1

Yes, because a bad person still has reasons behind their actions. He is afraid of her and she's asking him to kill her. You can bet your ass I'd leave. If the fake Nikki wakes up who knows what would happen and I'm certainly not murdering someone. I wouldn't be in that situation because I would've left her days ago and called the cops but his fear is completely understandable. For the 50th time he is undeniably a bad person. I have never once defended who he is or what he does at a base level. H…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/26 12:33 AM
1

M U R D E R She literally said he needed to be quiet. He was literally going somewhere. She wanted him to kill her, that was the conversation. What was he supposed to do? He literally can't solve her problem and she had one thing she wanted to say. And my God. We know he's an ass! Extremely well established. Never been denied. Bad people can be put in bad situations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 10:51 PM
1

Yes, he wanted to be loved by her. He very explicitly wants her to love him. An idealized version that he put on a pedestal but still her nonetheless. Before finding out that she has been wished into loving him and that he can't stop it he attempts to calm her multiple times. He asks if things are fine at many points in the movie. He asks if she is ok with things. He checks for consent. He asks if her love is real. He asks why she can't just love him. It's not one single instance. He ignored her…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 10:41 PM
1

Bear very clearly freaks out and is concerned for her at multiple points. The script isn't the end all be all. The movie presents things differently than the script. Seriously, can you actually read my comments? Quoting the script means nothing when I watched the movie. They aren't the same thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 08:28 PM
1

I literally already addressed this. That question proves my point. He wants her to actually want to be with him. He does care about her consent and you just proved it. Yeah, he doesn't kill her when she asked. That's murder, it isn't supposed to be simple. You can find a million examples of people refusing to pull the plug for their dying relatives and that isn't even actual murder like this. If you have actually read a lot of the script and not just this cherry-picked example you'd know how muc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 07:58 PM
1

Because he doesn't call the cops or have her admitted. He doesn't tell people what is wrong with her. This isn't a gotcha to my point. He's still a victim. He still didn't have any actual solutions to her condition other than a death. He still wanted her to really love him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 07:39 PM
1

It's called nuance. He's the "villain" but we can still talk about how he was in a bad situation. Curry invites that discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 06:03 PM
1

The director isn't the end all be all of discussion. He even said the film was open to interpretation. He enjoys the different view points. It's beyond me at this point. It's not even mine anymore. This movie just belongs to the world now and they're going to come up with their own ideas of what it means and what it is and I think that's really cool. On that note, Curry literally said that Bear is a normal guy with a crush. We understand that he is the bad guy and that he made a lot of choices h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 06:02 PM
1

that Bear is the villain Wow, it's almost like I've repeatedly said that's the point of the movie!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 05:41 PM
1

"Real." That call was not very convincing of the reality of her love at all. God your reading comprehension is shit. I've gone over everything you've said already. These aren't new points. I've covered all of this already. Keep going in circles if you want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 05:41 PM
1

He wanted her to love him. You made the rest of that up. Literally none of that is ever stated. What is explicitly shown is that he cares about her actually wanting him. He asks on the phone if her love is real and he asks her what would be so bad about being with him. This shows that he doesn't just want a sex doll regardless of her will. I don’t think he is a rapist. He still wanted her to be his little sex doll , regardless of her free will. These are contradictory statements.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 08:54 AM
1

He's a victim. Objectively. Yes, he is the one in the wrong. This has been well established. You aren't some enlightened genius for figuring out the literal plot of the movie. He just isn't the incel rapist everyone claims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 07:00 AM
1

He wanted to alter it, true, because he wanted her to love him. That isn't a crime. "Is it even real?" "Yeah it's real" "no, I know that the... Is her love real?" "Just because you chose this for her doesn't make it less real" He wants her love to be real. Consensual, honest love that would last them the rest of their lives. What he's trapped with isn't real, consensual love and thus he wants to cancel the wish. It's very clear, via what Bear had been going through, that the answer wasn't suffic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 11:04 PM
1

He literally asked to cancel the wish. I already went over why he wanted to change it before that. He asked if it was consensual, if she really loved him. Right after that he attempts to cancel the wish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 09:02 PM
1

What? He tried to solve the issue when he realized it wasn't her. That's why he called customer service. He only tried to solve the issue when she killed Sarah "Solve" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Again, the solution was murder or suicide! Pretend that you're better than me but that solution isn't easy for anyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 08:30 PM
2

Yes, it's so profound that you understand he's the bad guy. We get it. That's the whole point of the movie. He's still a victim of a wish he didn't mean to make. On that call to customer service he asks if her love is real because that's what he cares about. He wants her to actually love him which would be consentual and isn't wrong in any way. After he realizes that isn't possible he does cancel the wish, it just wasn't actually an option. What did you really expect him to do? Commit suicide or…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 05:56 PM
1

Yes, you are. As long as this supposed crisis isn't of a certain severity. Then that exact specification is my point. Someone can be emotional and still be perfectly consenting but how bad their mental state is can change that. He had no idea how fucked up she really was until he finds out the wish came true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 05:10 PM
1

Because she isn't on drugs. Again, it's a magical wish. Nobody had any idea how much it actually affected her judgement until after he finds out the wish is real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 05:06 PM
2

The movie very clearly presents a situation where she doesn't really love him. That's why we're having this conversation about it being nonconsensual.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 05:05 PM
1

I don't know. We're discussing a hypothetical wish where she would have been truly in love with him. We aren't talking about the movie anymore. In this hypothetical you can't tell me how it would work because it's magic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:29 AM
1

What you don't understand is that those things make him a bad person, not a rapist. No, I wouldn't date a weirdo like her after the wish. That still doesn't make it rape. You're allowed to date someone that is going through a mental health crisis. It happens to millions of people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:27 AM
1

And how do you know the wish is "forcing any constraint?" It's a magical wish. You can't tell me how it works at all. Neither of us have any way of determining how this hypothetical wish works.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:23 AM
1

Sure, she's very weird. That doesn't change how much express love and affection she gives him and asks for. Why does everyone keep pretending he's supposed to think the wish worked? It's a literal magical wish. Have you ever made a wish upon a star or thrown a coin down the well? Was the next sign of good luck an indication you took to mean your wish literally came true? Then after the call what is he supposed to feel? He was expressly told his only options were to kill someone, himself or her. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 04:52 AM
1

Yes, after the call. That's what I said. They have sex before that call where he confirms it isn't real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 04:01 AM
1

Rape is nonconsensual sex. If you give active and voluntary consent it isn't rape. You can be upset or depressed or whatever other mental state where you wouldn't normally have sex with someone and still give your rational consent. "Forcing" in what way? You don't know how the wish works. Would it be rape to go back in time and fall in love with someone that hates you in the present? Obviously not because they actually fell in love with you. If the love was "real" it qould be completely voluntar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 03:59 AM
2

She explicitly gives him consent for everything. That's the exact opposite of rape. Hate fucking your ex isn't rape even though you wouldn't have done it normally. The quotes is how it's consensual. It wouldn't be forced if she actually loved him. That's the whole point of the love being real. She actually does want him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 02:29 AM
2

She explicitly asks for his love and affection on multiple occasions. If she literally asks for sex then it would seem consensual to him. The movie already goes over how he's taking advantage of whatever her weird mental state would be but that isn't rape. Again, if her love was real why shouldn't he cancel it? If it really is real love it may be "forced" but it's still absolutely consensual. There is no problem with setting actions into motion that are completely consensual and there is no mora…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 12:20 AM
2

Yes, he clarifies that he doesn't want to cancel it and immediately after asks if her love is real. He doesn't want to cancel the wish because he still has hope it isn't fake. If she really does love him there is no crime so why should he cancel it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/26 04:13 PM
10

Multiple reasons. It does not happen after he realises the wish came true. It happens after he realises it is very possible that it came true. He very much suspects it but that doesn't mean he 100% knows. You have to remember that it's a magical wish that he never expected would come true at all because it's a wish. He only confirms that his wish was actually real after the sex scene when he calls the number on the box due to his previous suspicions. In that call he also literally asks if her lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 05:55 PM
37

Yep. I loved the movie so I went online to see what other people thought and it's just been misandry in every review. The main character was just a normal guy with feelings for his friend and he's confused and scared as he's also a victim. He's been turned into a rapist incel villain by people online.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 05:54 AM
6

The flirtatious competition is just a fun joke.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/26 05:31 AM
14

So anytime a woman is being rude you can call her fat? As we all obviously know, body shaming is awesome when we do it to bad people.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 04:26 AM
10

Yep, I was just told that I was minimizing women's struggles because I was saying that male victims of sexual violence are also common. For simply raising male victims to the same importance as female victims I was somehow minimizing them.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/25 09:27 PM
5

Do we have a list of subs like these? I'd love to do my part.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/25 08:50 AM
13

One often meets his destiny on the path he takes to avoid it
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:14 PM
2

Wow, I just looked it up and this does seem to be statistically true.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/25 06:45 PM
2

I'd hope we wouldn't downvote jokes. Especially ones about real problems. They aren't taking away visibility from the post or anything.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/25 08:24 PM
4

This may be true but women recieve lighter criminal sentences for pretty much everything.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/25 02:07 PM
1

So the dad gets a gift on the day the kids were concieved right?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/25 01:30 AM
4

However that argument has never only applied to men. This is universally true and doesn't have anything to do with the group that is male humans.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/25 12:40 AM
12

To get enjoyment out of it? Who knows? Women can be psychopathic too.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/25 07:25 PM
12

She could also of course rape, kidnap, or murder you herself.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/25 06:47 PM
15

Funnily enough I hear tons of stories about female doctors, especially OBGYN, not listening to their female patients.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/25 08:50 PM
1

Imagine that half of the world's population is replaced by huge beasts that have evolved for millions of years to kill. Those creatures are an upwards of 5 times larger than you and eat meat, your meat possibly. Or possibly not, they'll just maul you for being near their family or any other reason that isn't eating you. That's what it would be like if it were bears instead of men.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/24 09:34 PM
9

Women are only allowed to make their own choices if they choose what I like.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/24 06:01 PM
9

killing off toga, a canonically queer girl, was already bad enough Ah yes, I guess queer characters are just supposed to be immortal.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/24 06:00 PM
38

Just saw that post and it was filled with misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 09:47 AM
5

Men aren't machines yet they are expected to do 90% of the dangerous work. They are expected to do the manual labor. They are expected to go to war. All without support from the people they know and society as a whole. Sometimes shit just isn't fair. When you have sex you are making a choice to risk a baby. Yours and your partner's child. It takes two to tango. That baby is not the woman's to choose what to do with it.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 08:11 AM
3

They, of course, also interject any time a man talks about his issues to completely shut down that kind of talk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/24 08:55 AM
3

Without proof of a crime why would you believe they committed a crime? Guilty until proven innocent is idiotic.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:37 AM
5

Innovent until proven guilty is what you should believe in.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:31 AM
30

Did you even read any of the comments? Like any of them? That sure as hell is misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 04:11 AM
3

Yep, you can look at Redtaboo's account to see that they are the real deal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 09:08 PM
3

Here is a post on this sub from 3 years ago that has the same screenshot: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/EwWdfudUSW
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:58 PM
1

Just give me one second. I have a screenshot of it so I'll need to go find it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:54 PM
4

Yes, that is the exact quote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:53 PM
9

To quote the Reddit admins: those communities don't break our content policy. Our rule1 protects groups that are attacked based on a vulnerability, which doesn't pertain to white people or men as a group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:51 PM
3

Pro male rape? Considering that they want women to dehumanize men so that men can see how it feels... they probably would endorse this.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 06:35 PM
16

I also thought so after I dug through their other comments. They are pretty damn off putting. Especially considering the overwhelming anecdotes from women and men alike that claim women are much harsher about these things.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 05:01 AM
12

What are you talking about? They never said that.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 03:02 AM
26

Men deal with plenty of sexism so this is a pretty moot point. Either way they didn't leave it at "it's done to showcase the absurdity of [it]" like they could have to make an actual point. Instead they told women to change their perspective of men to purposely dehumanize them. This is sexism. This is bad. We don't defend this person's actions.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 02:48 AM
49

Yeah, not to dismiss their personal experience but I have seen way more judgement from women over these things.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 12:22 AM
1

I was just responding to tell you how ignorant you are. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 12:46 AM
1

Please just stop responding. If you aren't going to listen and you aren't going to do any researvh just leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:39 PM
1

Being a man is social invisibility. You have to provide to be cared for. Even then it's conditional. Again, you are just showing off your ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:04 PM
1

Holy shit. Companies don't care about you. Hiring a man doesn't mean you care about him. You're using him. You seriously just don't get it. This isn't some "gotcha" it just makes you look stupid to keep asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:44 PM
1

Do you know how to read? I never said I don't care. I said people don't inherently care about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:11 PM
1

Yikes. Great way to have a discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 08:54 PM
1

It means that people don't care about you. I've already told you I can't explain it. Do some research if you care.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 08:39 PM
1

Again, you simply don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 08:06 PM
2

It very much does but go off.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:33 PM
1

Because men statistically provide much more financially for a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:55 AM
-2

What? Men are still expected to be the breadwinner. Yes, women do work full time jobs now. That doesn't change that the man is supporting most of their income. Women's money is expected to be hers, women's finances are for independence. Men's money is supposed to go to the family. They are expected to provide. Another example is dating. Men are still expecting to pay for these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:51 AM
1

As I said, you just don't understand. I can't explain it to you but that is not at all what I am talking about. Just do some research on the male loneliness epidemic as well as trans men's experience with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:49 AM
1

There are ~3-4 times as many homeless men as there are women. I wouldn't even compare them. But no, not at all what I mean. You just don't understand the loneliness and isolation of being a man. People simply don't care about you unless you provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:46 AM
-2

Men are the primary earner in most marriages so... no.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:44 AM
1

We're not talking about romantic invisibility. We're talking about total invisibility. Men, women, friends, society as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 04:55 AM
2

It's a discussion. You clearly don't understand anything about being a man. You also refuse to believe anyone that brings it up. Dismissal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 04:06 AM
2

You did actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 04:05 AM
2

Because I don't have an issue with discussion. It's dismissal that is a problem. I simply told you that men are also sexually harrassed. You decided that wasn't true and that you were going to dismiss that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 03:12 AM
2

The whole post is about men working to benefit their families. You then said "millionaires" aren't altruistic, which they are. The proof is nepotism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 03:11 AM
2

I believe you are from your persepective. I can't know what your perspective is. What I do know is how many "invisible," shy, and introverted trans men that have said they didn't understand how lonely it was to be a man until after they transitioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 03:09 AM
2

Again, either way you can't say that millionaires aren't altruistic when I just showed you that they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:42 AM
2

No, they don't. You just only see that because you are in circles that only allow women to talk about their issues. This very post has men discussing their issues. Under those discussions are women using their issues as a rebuttal and dismissing those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:41 AM
2

Because that's from the post. This whole discussion is about the post. That thread is responding to the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:32 AM
2

The stats that are surveys and polls. The stats show that men under report and don't believe that harrassment and assault that they are the victims of is a bad thing. I can't believe a survey when I know the stats show that men aren't going to accurately engage with said survey. We do. Then we are shit on and shut down by women like you. I bring up men's issues as well as other men here and you haven't once listened to them. You just keep dismissing it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:32 AM
4

Men are taught from young that their purpose is to provide for their partner and family and that they should derive a sense of joy, satisfaction and purpose from being a provider. Yes, it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:26 AM
3

If you want to pretend that then sure. Problem is, I'm saying men's issues are bad and thus they aren't automatically better than yours. You are claiming they aren't that bad. One is actual dismissal the other isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:26 AM
2

Again. It doesn't matter. This isn't a gendered issue like you claim it is. Maybe I'd be one of the men who thinks nothing bad happened and, therefore, not be traumatized by it You very much would be. And that's the problem. You pretending this is some kind of blessing is just a plain dismissal of men's issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:24 AM
3

Did you even read my comment? I literally said: Boys also endure more than that. Keep dismissing men's issues though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:17 AM
2

Statistics show it's much closer than you think. Men under report at higher rates than women. Men don't believe that what happens to them even counts as harrassment or assault. These things cause men to come forward less and answer polls and surveys which is the most common form of "evidence" for this. Some women count anything as harrassment or assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:16 AM
2

What? Is that really all you got from that? I'm proving that you are wrong. Millionaires aren't altruistic to random people that work for them, yes. This is about families though and millionairs are insanely altruistic when it comes to family.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:15 AM
3

I'm pointing out that you are entirely wrong. Boys also endure more than that. I just went with the most common examples that fit your stupid assumption that boys under 10 aren't sexualized by older female relatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:14 AM
2

We know. Yet this isn't a gendered things as people have already told you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:12 AM
3

Never noticed or literally not interacted with at all. From your point of view it may seem that you aren't noticed but maybe you are. There are many stories from trans men about the loneliness and how hard it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:01 AM
6

Yes, hahahahaha. This is very common for men. Having your grandma and aunts telling you that you are such a handsome little man. Telling you that all the girls in kindergarten will be swooning for you. Saying they wish they could take you for themselves. This is very common indeed. Edit: I even forgot about older women calling little boys their boyfriends. Not creepy at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:52 AM
2

There is a very large stigma around men coming out about these things. As well as boys being taught that they should enjoy these things. He very well may have been sexualized you just didn't recognize it and he never told you about the things he experienced in private.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:50 AM
3

Being a millionaire is very altruistic to your family. Ever heard of nepotism? Which is exactly the point. Men are expected and taught to provide for their family and women are taught to be independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:35 AM
-2

I've never known anyone that has been taught or taught others that BS. I've seen many and I mean many men that are taught they need to provide for their women. That they need to have a good job in order to be valuable at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:32 AM
8

At least they did include attempts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 10:50 PM
14

1 in 4 women reported completed or attempted rape during her lifetime 1 in 9 men reported being made to penetrate someone during his lifetime. Am I reading correctly that they are counting attempts for women but not for men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 10:39 PM
6

Women have voted more than men in every single presidential election since the 1980's.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 10:46 PM
1

I fully agree with you. Just making sure to point out why it is this way. So yes, there are health issues Those don't count for things like this. Correlation is not causation and all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/24 06:53 PM
2

I get what you mean but medications are prescribed based on a trade off. If the side effects are worse than the symptoms they won't prescribe the medication because it'll just make it "worse." Female hormonal birth control is fine because, while the side effects are bad, it stops all of the horrible symptoms that could come from a pregnancy. There are no symptoms for being a fertile man so any side effects are considered worse than just not taking it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/24 05:17 PM
54

Gotta love the misandry in the comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/24 04:57 AM
25

More so just that false accusations can ruin multiple lives and are very serious.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/24 07:15 PM
21

I see whataboutism pretty much exclusively the opposite way. I do concede that this may be biased because I talk about men's issues more than women's.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/24 05:32 AM
18

No, actually, I don't immediately kill a snake when I see it in my house.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 09:16 AM
3

I wholeheartedly agree. I think using these buzzwords and calling eachother names isn't going to help at all. Even if it did however, nobody ever uses these words in the correct way. Incel has never meant what people say it does they just attribute it to a group. Then femcel came along as a way to get back at them but it still has the same meaning.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/06/24 02:35 PM
3

This question was always defended using the kafka trap. They never actually have a good argument.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/06/24 02:32 PM
17

They constantly talk about men needing to empathize with their feelings... which is bullshit because their feelings rely on men being more deadly than a half-ton killing machine. How do you empathize with irrational thought meant to demonize your gender? Then they, of course, refuse to empathize with men whenever they speak out.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 05:34 AM
7

This post is the proof of it
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 05:16 PM
7

I don't think it would help. They don't take hate speech towards men seriously.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 05:15 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/s/vUfSGReCkG
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 05:14 PM
6

A small number of men and women. There are rich women. There are women in politics. There are women with power.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 05:14 PM
0

You very much could. It wouldn't be sexual at all.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:49 AM
0

No, I did. Its just important to remember that there is a difference. Also where did I explain it?
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:49 AM
3

I get the joke but it very much does not depend on that
/r/MensRights16/05/24 04:37 PM
46

Or if you have a sense of humor. Which you clearly don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/20 07:15 PM
251

This is the only correct response
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/20 04:34 PM
28

Darker colors absorb more light
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 08:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter