TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hhhhhhhhhhhjf Archive

View 1 post and 83 comments by hhhhhhhhhhhjf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
124

social mediahhhhhhhhhhhjf/r/EverydayMisandry29/10/24 11:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Then at least the word means "equality" not "women" and it has no historical connection to a single gender's struggles. That's a lot harder to co-opt.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 02:03 AM
6

All people should move away from "feminism." It's been taken over by bad actors and hasn't been about real equality in a long time. The name itself is a call to misandrists that only care about women. Someone that cares about real equality would be an egalitarian.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 01:44 AM
10

Never said it was. It definitely isn't about true equality though. There is way too little work done for men and too much support for shitty women for feminism to care about men. Those radical feminists are still feminists though because terms evolve. The movement is no longer exclusive for those types of people.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 01:31 AM
15

Radical feminist They are still a feminist whether you like it or not.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 12:02 AM
1

He wanted to alter it, true, because he wanted her to love him. That isn't a crime. "Is it even real?" "Yeah it's real" "no, I know that the... Is her love real?" "Just because you chose this for her doesn't make it less real" He wants her love to be real. Consensual, honest love that would last them the rest of their lives. What he's trapped with isn't real, consensual love and thus he wants to cancel the wish. It's very clear, via what Bear had been going through, that the answer wasn't suffic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 11:04 PM
1

He literally asked to cancel the wish. I already went over why he wanted to change it before that. He asked if it was consensual, if she really loved him. Right after that he attempts to cancel the wish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 09:02 PM
1

What? He tried to solve the issue when he realized it wasn't her. That's why he called customer service. He only tried to solve the issue when she killed Sarah "Solve" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Again, the solution was murder or suicide! Pretend that you're better than me but that solution isn't easy for anyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 08:30 PM
2

Yes, it's so profound that you understand he's the bad guy. We get it. That's the whole point of the movie. He's still a victim of a wish he didn't mean to make. On that call to customer service he asks if her love is real because that's what he cares about. He wants her to actually love him which would be consentual and isn't wrong in any way. After he realizes that isn't possible he does cancel the wish, it just wasn't actually an option. What did you really expect him to do? Commit suicide or…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 05:56 PM
2

She explicitly gives him consent for everything. That's the exact opposite of rape. Hate fucking your ex isn't rape even though you wouldn't have done it normally. The quotes is how it's consensual. It wouldn't be forced if she actually loved him. That's the whole point of the love being real. She actually does want him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 02:29 AM
2

She explicitly asks for his love and affection on multiple occasions. If she literally asks for sex then it would seem consensual to him. The movie already goes over how he's taking advantage of whatever her weird mental state would be but that isn't rape. Again, if her love was real why shouldn't he cancel it? If it really is real love it may be "forced" but it's still absolutely consensual. There is no problem with setting actions into motion that are completely consensual and there is no mora…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 12:20 AM
2

Yes, he clarifies that he doesn't want to cancel it and immediately after asks if her love is real. He doesn't want to cancel the wish because he still has hope it isn't fake. If she really does love him there is no crime so why should he cancel it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/26 04:13 PM
10

Multiple reasons. It does not happen after he realises the wish came true. It happens after he realises it is very possible that it came true. He very much suspects it but that doesn't mean he 100% knows. You have to remember that it's a magical wish that he never expected would come true at all because it's a wish. He only confirms that his wish was actually real after the sex scene when he calls the number on the box due to his previous suspicions. In that call he also literally asks if her lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 05:55 PM
37

Yep. I loved the movie so I went online to see what other people thought and it's just been misandry in every review. The main character was just a normal guy with feelings for his friend and he's confused and scared as he's also a victim. He's been turned into a rapist incel villain by people online.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 05:54 AM
6

The flirtatious competition is just a fun joke.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/26 05:31 AM
14

So anytime a woman is being rude you can call her fat? As we all obviously know, body shaming is awesome when we do it to bad people.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 04:26 AM
10

Yep, I was just told that I was minimizing women's struggles because I was saying that male victims of sexual violence are also common. For simply raising male victims to the same importance as female victims I was somehow minimizing them.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/25 09:27 PM
5

Do we have a list of subs like these? I'd love to do my part.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/25 08:50 AM
13

One often meets his destiny on the path he takes to avoid it
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:14 PM
2

Wow, I just looked it up and this does seem to be statistically true.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/25 06:45 PM
2

I'd hope we wouldn't downvote jokes. Especially ones about real problems. They aren't taking away visibility from the post or anything.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/25 08:24 PM
4

This may be true but women recieve lighter criminal sentences for pretty much everything.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/25 02:07 PM
1

So the dad gets a gift on the day the kids were concieved right?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/25 01:30 AM
4

However that argument has never only applied to men. This is universally true and doesn't have anything to do with the group that is male humans.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/25 12:40 AM
12

To get enjoyment out of it? Who knows? Women can be psychopathic too.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/25 07:25 PM
12

She could also of course rape, kidnap, or murder you herself.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/25 06:47 PM
15

Funnily enough I hear tons of stories about female doctors, especially OBGYN, not listening to their female patients.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/25 08:50 PM
1

Imagine that half of the world's population is replaced by huge beasts that have evolved for millions of years to kill. Those creatures are an upwards of 5 times larger than you and eat meat, your meat possibly. Or possibly not, they'll just maul you for being near their family or any other reason that isn't eating you. That's what it would be like if it were bears instead of men.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/24 09:34 PM
9

Women are only allowed to make their own choices if they choose what I like.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/24 06:01 PM
9

killing off toga, a canonically queer girl, was already bad enough Ah yes, I guess queer characters are just supposed to be immortal.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/24 06:00 PM
38

Just saw that post and it was filled with misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 09:47 AM
5

Men aren't machines yet they are expected to do 90% of the dangerous work. They are expected to do the manual labor. They are expected to go to war. All without support from the people they know and society as a whole. Sometimes shit just isn't fair. When you have sex you are making a choice to risk a baby. Yours and your partner's child. It takes two to tango. That baby is not the woman's to choose what to do with it.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 08:11 AM
3

They, of course, also interject any time a man talks about his issues to completely shut down that kind of talk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/24 08:55 AM
3

Without proof of a crime why would you believe they committed a crime? Guilty until proven innocent is idiotic.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:37 AM
5

Innovent until proven guilty is what you should believe in.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:31 AM
30

Did you even read any of the comments? Like any of them? That sure as hell is misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 04:11 AM
3

Yep, you can look at Redtaboo's account to see that they are the real deal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 09:08 PM
3

Here is a post on this sub from 3 years ago that has the same screenshot: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/EwWdfudUSW
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:58 PM
1

Just give me one second. I have a screenshot of it so I'll need to go find it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:54 PM
4

Yes, that is the exact quote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:53 PM
9

To quote the Reddit admins: those communities don't break our content policy. Our rule1 protects groups that are attacked based on a vulnerability, which doesn't pertain to white people or men as a group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:51 PM
3

Pro male rape? Considering that they want women to dehumanize men so that men can see how it feels... they probably would endorse this.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 06:35 PM
16

I also thought so after I dug through their other comments. They are pretty damn off putting. Especially considering the overwhelming anecdotes from women and men alike that claim women are much harsher about these things.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 05:01 AM
12

What are you talking about? They never said that.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 03:02 AM
26

Men deal with plenty of sexism so this is a pretty moot point. Either way they didn't leave it at "it's done to showcase the absurdity of [it]" like they could have to make an actual point. Instead they told women to change their perspective of men to purposely dehumanize them. This is sexism. This is bad. We don't defend this person's actions.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 02:48 AM
49

Yeah, not to dismiss their personal experience but I have seen way more judgement from women over these things.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/24 12:22 AM
2

It very much does but go off.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:33 PM
1

Because men statistically provide much more financially for a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:55 AM
-2

What? Men are still expected to be the breadwinner. Yes, women do work full time jobs now. That doesn't change that the man is supporting most of their income. Women's money is expected to be hers, women's finances are for independence. Men's money is supposed to go to the family. They are expected to provide. Another example is dating. Men are still expecting to pay for these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:51 AM
-2

Men are the primary earner in most marriages so... no.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:44 AM
1

We're not talking about romantic invisibility. We're talking about total invisibility. Men, women, friends, society as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 04:55 AM
2

I believe you are from your persepective. I can't know what your perspective is. What I do know is how many "invisible," shy, and introverted trans men that have said they didn't understand how lonely it was to be a man until after they transitioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 03:09 AM
4

Men are taught from young that their purpose is to provide for their partner and family and that they should derive a sense of joy, satisfaction and purpose from being a provider. Yes, it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:26 AM
2

Statistics show it's much closer than you think. Men under report at higher rates than women. Men don't believe that what happens to them even counts as harrassment or assault. These things cause men to come forward less and answer polls and surveys which is the most common form of "evidence" for this. Some women count anything as harrassment or assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:16 AM
2

What? Is that really all you got from that? I'm proving that you are wrong. Millionaires aren't altruistic to random people that work for them, yes. This is about families though and millionairs are insanely altruistic when it comes to family.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:15 AM
3

I'm pointing out that you are entirely wrong. Boys also endure more than that. I just went with the most common examples that fit your stupid assumption that boys under 10 aren't sexualized by older female relatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:14 AM
2

We know. Yet this isn't a gendered things as people have already told you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:12 AM
3

Never noticed or literally not interacted with at all. From your point of view it may seem that you aren't noticed but maybe you are. There are many stories from trans men about the loneliness and how hard it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 01:01 AM
6

Yes, hahahahaha. This is very common for men. Having your grandma and aunts telling you that you are such a handsome little man. Telling you that all the girls in kindergarten will be swooning for you. Saying they wish they could take you for themselves. This is very common indeed. Edit: I even forgot about older women calling little boys their boyfriends. Not creepy at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:52 AM
2

There is a very large stigma around men coming out about these things. As well as boys being taught that they should enjoy these things. He very well may have been sexualized you just didn't recognize it and he never told you about the things he experienced in private.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:50 AM
3

Being a millionaire is very altruistic to your family. Ever heard of nepotism? Which is exactly the point. Men are expected and taught to provide for their family and women are taught to be independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:35 AM
-2

I've never known anyone that has been taught or taught others that BS. I've seen many and I mean many men that are taught they need to provide for their women. That they need to have a good job in order to be valuable at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 12:32 AM
8

At least they did include attempts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 10:50 PM
14

1 in 4 women reported completed or attempted rape during her lifetime 1 in 9 men reported being made to penetrate someone during his lifetime. Am I reading correctly that they are counting attempts for women but not for men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 10:39 PM
6

Women have voted more than men in every single presidential election since the 1980's.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 10:46 PM
1

I fully agree with you. Just making sure to point out why it is this way. So yes, there are health issues Those don't count for things like this. Correlation is not causation and all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/24 06:53 PM
2

I get what you mean but medications are prescribed based on a trade off. If the side effects are worse than the symptoms they won't prescribe the medication because it'll just make it "worse." Female hormonal birth control is fine because, while the side effects are bad, it stops all of the horrible symptoms that could come from a pregnancy. There are no symptoms for being a fertile man so any side effects are considered worse than just not taking it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/24 05:17 PM
54

Gotta love the misandry in the comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/24 04:57 AM
25

More so just that false accusations can ruin multiple lives and are very serious.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/24 07:15 PM
21

I see whataboutism pretty much exclusively the opposite way. I do concede that this may be biased because I talk about men's issues more than women's.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/24 05:32 AM
18

No, actually, I don't immediately kill a snake when I see it in my house.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 09:16 AM
3

I wholeheartedly agree. I think using these buzzwords and calling eachother names isn't going to help at all. Even if it did however, nobody ever uses these words in the correct way. Incel has never meant what people say it does they just attribute it to a group. Then femcel came along as a way to get back at them but it still has the same meaning.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/06/24 02:35 PM
3

This question was always defended using the kafka trap. They never actually have a good argument.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/06/24 02:32 PM
17

They constantly talk about men needing to empathize with their feelings... which is bullshit because their feelings rely on men being more deadly than a half-ton killing machine. How do you empathize with irrational thought meant to demonize your gender? Then they, of course, refuse to empathize with men whenever they speak out.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 05:34 AM
7

This post is the proof of it
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 05:16 PM
7

I don't think it would help. They don't take hate speech towards men seriously.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 05:15 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/s/vUfSGReCkG
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 05:14 PM
6

A small number of men and women. There are rich women. There are women in politics. There are women with power.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 05:14 PM
0

You very much could. It wouldn't be sexual at all.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:49 AM
0

No, I did. Its just important to remember that there is a difference. Also where did I explain it?
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:49 AM
3

I get the joke but it very much does not depend on that
/r/MensRights16/05/24 04:37 PM
46

Or if you have a sense of humor. Which you clearly don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/20 07:15 PM
251

This is the only correct response
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/20 04:34 PM
28

Darker colors absorb more light
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 08:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter