TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hiesatai Archive

View 2 posts and 23 comments by hiesatai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Stop looking and girls will find you more attractive. This is bullshit advice. If you're not making an actual effort to meet and impress people, why would a stranger ever engage with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/18 08:47 AM
2

+/u/User_Simulator hiesatai
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 08:52 PM
-16

Seriously, this sub feels like it's nothing but low effort posts by hard redpill motherfuckers. This isn't what this sub used to be.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:14 PM
1

Ok? And how does this take an opportunity away from the boys currently in the program?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:42 PM
1

From your article: Next fall, girls who are Cub Scout age – in first through fifth grades — can join a Cub Scout pack or den with other girls. Boys and girls will still be separated to some extent, Quirk says. "There won't be any commingling at this point," he says. "It won't be a coed den; it will be a den of all boys or all girls." So no, units will not be co-ed. I received my Eagle in 2006, and my use of the term "sister" may have been a bit hyperbolic, but the fact still remains that this in…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:34 PM
1

The Gold Award does not carry the same weight as Eagle. Individual troops will also not be co-ed. This is literally not taking anything away from boys, and as an Eagle Scout myself, I look forward to being able to call these girls my sisters some day.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:41 PM
1

It's not destroying a boy's opportunity to be a boy. That boy has the same opportunity he's always had. But now girls are also allowed to earn one of the most prestigious awards a child can earn. This doesn't take away from the clout that Eagle carries, just opens up the opportunity to earn it to the other half of children.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:35 PM
2

Then it's not broken, it's malfunctioning.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 08:49 PM
-19

What are stolen jokes, you mean.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 09:13 PM
30

It depends on the jurisdiction. In England, you're absolutely correct, but in some U.S. jurisdictions, made to penetrate is included in the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:46 PM
5

But there are issues that affect all men, regardless of their race, that are posted about here quite frequently. False accusations, custody of children, disproportionate sentences for crimes, these are all something than men of any race can experience, and they're some of the more common topics on this sub.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:23 PM
9

A court case in Louisiana recently had a husband and wife charged with literally, verbatim, the same exact crimes. Man gets prison time, woman gets communicated sentence.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 11:59 PM
24

This. A thousand times this. The quote is not a men's rights issue, but a lamentation of the workin class in general.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:06 AM
1

So what about me? I'm unmarried, have no kids, and no woman relying on my paycheck. And I'm not expected to find one. Yet the quote still applies to me, not because of gender rights, but because of the ever growing disparity in the wage of the worker and the profit of the corporation.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:11 AM
1

Because he's talking about corporate cogs and entry level workers in general. The "somebody else" the worker in question is making rich isn't a wife or a girlfriend, it's an executive.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:55 AM
0

Seems to me like this is a non-profit that has a deal with Verizon, and these women are simply the stock models for that nonprofit. But then again, I don't know the full story.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:45 AM
7

I normally can't stand this woman. Her voice is irritating, and her viewpoints tend to grind my gears. That being said, I'm glad she's calling this what it is.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:06 AM
-5

Posted this days ago
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:17 PM
3

As far as anger is concerned, I agree; channel it through a physical activity. Might I suggest rock climbing or fencing? Those are the two that always give me a cool down.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:23 AM
-8

See, it's not just her choice though. The act that led to conception in the first place was consensual. If pregnancy, occurs, even if both parties agree to terminate, or if the child is carried to term, you don't think the man has any kind of financial obligation, at least during the pregnancy, which is literally 50% his fault?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:05 AM
2

Right, but when the only option in today's society is to shell out a significant portion of your income for a child you'll rarely see, that puts a sour taste in most any man's mouth when they hear the words "child support" or "alimony". If I were to get a woman pregnant and she wanted me to help pay for the child's food and clothes and toys, and other essentials of that nature, that's fine, but you'll be damn certain that I'm going to see my child more than three days out of the month.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:51 AM
6

The bigger issue here isn't simply "Oh, I have to pay money now". It's more about the fact that if you do the math on the subject, the monthly payments wind up adding up, in total, on average, to being more than half the cost of raising a child to 18. We live in a world where both gender's should be treated as equals, and yet, after consensual intercourse, a child is born, and the man still pays more than half of the cost of raising the child, all the while, oftentimes not being allowed to see o…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:40 AM
2

This is what I'm dealing with right now. A whole section of my friends, that I had been hanging out with for years, has all of a sudden turned their backs on me because of something like this. I can't go to my favorite bar anymore because of this.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter