TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

highspergyme Archive

View 5 posts and 95 comments by highspergyme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

oh god you're even cringier than I thought lol. you can quit swinging around your big dick energy now. we get it. you're r/iamverybadass there's only room for one atlas around here, and people come here for the real thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 01:33 PM
1

lol aren't you a fucking dog groomer. dense population of geniuses in your field, I'm sure. continue to flex 'muh iq' though; it's not any less cringy when chicks do it than when neckbeard bravetheists do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:39 AM
9

Negging and dread game are meant to be playful banter, not deliberate emotional abuse or insecure lashing out. Reds and blues are visualizing completely different interactions whenever these are discussed. AWALT is not meant to be an all-encompassing reductive blanket explanation for why all women suck and are inferior people, but a prophylactic against oneitis and a way to snap men out of the mindset that just because you looooove your unicorn 'for who she is', it doesn't mean you can stop gami…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/19 11:07 AM
1

Lots of guys like fat women Your disgusting landwhale beastiality is a rare peversion
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 08:13 PM
16

I first found TRP in late 2014 and read it regularly until the end of 2016. The time period is important, arguably the halcyon days of the sub, when dr_warlock, Woujo, UncleVasily, and MikeHaines were the most prominent contributors, and GLO was still funny. I was the ideal target: awkward but not pathologically anti-social, skinny, inhibited but not a mute autist, had a gf or three by my early 20s but struggle to maintain sexual chemistry from women...your run of the mill AFC. I was motivated t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 01:51 PM
1

because it's her, electra
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 04:29 PM
4

wildly varying demographics Yes, we get it, you're a rich girl from a nice place who never has any problems unlike those icky proles who get what they deserve
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 09:09 PM
1

Cool, thank you for answering. Yeah, I think her issue with it also comes from past relationships where it was much more of a focal point in her exes lives' and she felt neglected/crowded out. Your husband's pattern sounds similar to mine; I only use it at night before bed or late in the afternoon to relax or change my headspace to pursue my hobbies. She also reports not really noticing a change in my personality and since I dont use it in front of her she often doesnt even know I've smoked unle…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 08:47 PM
3

How do you find the stoner/non-stoner divide affects your relationship? Your dynamic seems similar to mine with my LTR except Im the introverted one and she's more socially inclined (but not really what I'd call a social butterfly by any means). I can tell she finds my usage less than ideal because it makes me more inclined to just hang out at home, cook in-house and just mess around with personal projects, but we still do go out every weekend and I manage to have a good time. As a non-user do y…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 08:05 PM
1

The obesity is highly localized tho, if you go to any college town or hip urban center pretty much everyone walking around is fit and attractive. The rise in obesity is mostly from flyover country and small town America and it skews the average
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 07:28 PM
2

Now it's like why would I even consider a date You dont think most women crave the extra, hi-res validation from men* that can only be gotten from face to face interaction? *that they find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 10:03 PM
1

ah my mistake
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 07:14 PM
1

And yet being a leader of men is not necessary to being a fucker of women, as with Black Jack Davy from Atlas's comment. Neither necessary nor sufficient. Doesn't this imply that women's raw sexual attraction is not necessarily tied to power or status, that it is other traits that are really responsible?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 07:09 PM
5

Fair point but do you think there is a distinction between women being attracted to a man based on power/status vs just the raw sexual attraction to Casanovas? I submit that there is. Most men would prefer that women be sexually attracted to them based on their competence but, seeing as this is often not the case, wish they had the same draw for women as Black Jack Davy from Atlas's original comment
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 06:37 PM
1

What would that better society look like, to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 06:26 PM
2

I used to have the misconception that these two kinds of attractions are interchangeable for women. I think a lot of us here grew up with that misconception. Once aspired to the former, then the latter. What made you change?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 06:24 PM
1

You were in the military, no? I think that makes your perspective unique here. Did that experience influence your values at all? Do you think there's something to be said for valuing male leadership and male hierarchy? Also, what if you only had daughters?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 06:22 PM
1

Haha, fair enough, I'm sympathetic to your unconventional value hierarchy and I can get on board with Fighting the Man. Maybe noble was a poor choice of word but I couldn't think of a better antonym for 'hedonist' fast enough. You have made me aware of the covert judgment my post is loaded with and I think I agree to an extent that hedonism takes on many forms of which our lizard overlords are far from innocent of, while the libertine lifestyle gets a bad rap in our culture despite not being nec…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 06:13 PM
2

Did you ever feel differently? How do you think society would change if every man felt the same and was taught TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 06:00 PM
1

Elaborate? Are you conflicted about this? If most men felt as you do how do you predict this would affect the culture and society at large? Do you care or is it enjoy the decline all the way
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 05:58 PM
2

He started talking marriage Yeeeeah not a red piller
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 10:27 AM
-1

Anyone with experience is damaged
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 09:00 PM
3

Not with him
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:20 PM
5

Autism on reddit is fake news. Those with legitimate pathologies are no more prevalent here than elsewhere. Everyone here thinks they're a secret savant but they're really just neurotics with garden variety anxiety and mental illness. We had a term for these people in the past: Losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:32 AM
2

I mean, obviously you are not just spergily declaring to them that they are replaceable. I'm the one who did the OP on the importance of illusion to seduction the other day. I understand the value of innuendo. But you are convincing the woman, if in a deep, liminal, sub textual way, that you are used to making many women feel the way you make her feel; that he is not mine, it's just my turn
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:21 AM
5

Hell, half of TRP is helping guys learn how to convince a woman that she is being treated like a special snowflake and not like "all the other girls." This is false. What happened to AWALT? TRP was all about convincing women of the exact opposite; you know, abundance mentality, making women feel like they are interchangeable and easily replaceable and that their primary value to your life (their sexuality and XX bodies) is a readily acquireable resource for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 02:52 AM
3

Well tbh I don't follow MRP and have no experience with what sorts of complains the men there have about their spouses, but I can only guess that anyone drawn to that community is far from typical and shouldn't be extrapolated from. The larger point, to me, is that men tend to be much more forgiving of unsexy behavior in their partners than the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 07:41 PM
2

Oh for fuck's sake. "Only women are loved post-honesty"? Come ON. Yeah, fair. I regret that line in the OP; otherwise, I stand by it. This sounds like the reasoning of someone who's never been close to a woman, even as a friend, in their lives. Well, it's important to distinguish that we're not talking about friendship but specifically romantic LTRs and sexual attraction. I don't know if it reinforces my point to disclose that I have close female friends where full disclosure is not a concern, s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 07:12 PM
2

There is nothing really dishonest about being mysterious. I take umbrage with the word 'dishonest' here, otherwise I think we agree. It is dishonest, in a quite literal sense. I agree that not oversharing or confessing every detail of yourself isn't necessarily lying, but what I'm talking about goes a little bit further. You are intentionally manipulating your partner's image of you in ways that are less than perfectly transparent to the benefit of both of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:42 PM
2

That’s just lying Yes, it is. That is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 06:37 PM
7

Yes, exactly. Those men wouldnt hate their wives for being sick or having kids if they stayed as interested in sex
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 05:58 PM
4

So like a guy who was never very successful with women being vague about his past and making jokes like "yeah the ladies love me but I'm off the market now" would be an exmaple of soft delusion to you? No, my point is that the guys who are successful with women are the ones who are vague about their pasts, in ways that entice women and make them wonder about your past exploits/relationships. There's a lot of nuance here that's hard to describe with words, but basically there is an art form to fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 05:51 PM
3

Seriously though what are some examples of those things you deem “white lies and soft delusion?” Basically subtle distortions of who you really are, to keep a woman's interest and to avoid turning her off. Things like not always telling her where you are or what you're doing, answering probing questions with humor and deflection rather than total honesty, and, in more long-term set-ups, avoiding exposing her to seeing you in less than glamorous light, like if you're sick or dealing with a loss/e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 05:25 PM
2

Would you agree that, typically, the burden is greater for men though? It is usually the man who has to cater to the woman's sensibilities, rather than the other way around. TRP used to be about teaching men how to have relationships work on their own terms instead
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 05:16 PM
3

The reason would be that he knew you would not see it as ideal and likely would not continue the relationship. Even if he gave you a different reason, would this not be what you would suspect regardless? Because you would have felt willfully mislead, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 05:12 PM
1

But that doesn’t mean women aren’t burdened by totally equal incentives to keep their mouths shut about certain things or cast certain ideas in a benevolently deceitful light. I don't disagree entirely. Women definitely have their own illusions to maintain, but I would argue that it comes more naturally to them, and in fact it is their own sensibilities that make the deceit necessary. The burden is shared, but unequally.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:55 PM
3

Is that not just a lie of omission? If your boyfriend secretly had a child from a past relationship and did not tell you about it until a year into the relationship, would you feel deceived?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:39 PM
2

Your situation is interesting though, you took the alternative route of opening up your relationship to keep it exciting. I submit that this makes your situation an imperfect comparison for the type of sexual chemistry common to most LTRs
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:26 PM
1

You're welcome to search through my post history to find examples of me taking women bitching to be the gospel truth about anything, but I'll save you the trouble and tell you you'll find nothing of the sort. Speaking of post histories though, madsci, I remember the days when you used tell us how your husband was the sexiest fucking thing you'd ever seen, how you were so on fire for the Lord and for your husband, how you were so passionate and dedicated to your new born-again life in the church …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:12 PM
1

Herself
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 09:31 PM
3

where i come from it's potayto, potahto, respectively
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 06:22 PM
1

++ for Carousel Kings Amish country easycore ftw
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 01:21 PM
1

Can you provide me with an example of any action free of limitations? When are humans in a society truly free of limitations?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:16 PM
1

Gay men and women faced consequences, yes, in certain societies at certain times. Yet they freely engaged in socially shamed sexual behavior anyways, because, ultimately, they were FREE to. Do you know anything about LGBT counterculture in the states during the 20th century, places like the Castro in SF during the late 50s and 60s, bathhouse culture, etc. Social exclusion just drove these people to form their own subcultures, they were rarely if ever physically prevented from having all the gay …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:08 PM
1

The consequence of murder is imprisonment aka the negation of freedom. Thus you are not truly free to murder, you actually put your personal freedom at stake. There is no equivalence to ambiguous social consequences. Social exclusion does not truly physically or psychologically prevent you from making a choice in the same way that the justice system will physically limit your freedom if you are found guilty of murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:55 PM
2

No, my standard is the law, or actual psychological or medical restriction, like underage children not being mentally capable of consenting to sex. De jure vs. De facto. Murder is illegal. It's pretty much the most illegal thing no matter where you go. That's not just vague 'social shaming' as a consequence but actual legal ramifications enforced by the state. How can you equate that to non enforceable shaming?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:42 PM
1

It was de facto not de jure. Plenty of women eloped or ran away with sexual partners their families didn't approve of. 60 years ago was the 1950s not the 1250s, did you never read On the Road or any of the beatniks? Women freely chose to abandon their lives of safety for men all the time. Do you think in 1950s America families were literally still trading their daughters for cattle?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:25 PM
1

Legally and psychologically, yes. Unmarried women were free to have sex with whom they wished. That does not mean it was free of consequences. Fathers and brothers de facto regulated THEIR women's sexuality, that is not the same as it literally being against the law. Are you seriously suggesting that just 60 years ago the state was involved with female sexuality? Or that women somehow were not cognitively capable of making the choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:09 PM
4

It doesn't impede the freedom to choose, it merely levies certain consequences. You are still free to make the choice if you are willing to accept the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 04:24 PM
2

Life has 100% led me to believe that women naturally consider multiple variables at all times; and that men honestly don’t as much. lol i.e. 'I have run out of arguments but I'm right anyway because my personal experience cant possibly be wrong' Pure undiluted female solipsism. Female neuroticism is not some XX superpower, just because you want it to be. It's likely evopsych origin is FSM status games, not some benevolent talent snatching babies from certain death. And like/u/Plopolok pointed ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 02:16 PM
18

'Emotional labor' is just femsplaining for 'validating my neurosis'
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 06:20 PM
1

Very cool, thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 09:23 PM
1

Which books are your favorites?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 08:42 PM
5

The whole point of the thread is which gender is more diverse and inclusive in its sexualization of the opposite sex. That this is even up for debate is baffling to me. It is universally acknowledged mathematical fact that men find a much greater proportion of women sexually appealing than the reverse. Anyone that denies that cant be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 01:21 AM
2

even if she isn't what a lot of them are super into I dont think any would be like "ew dude, seriously, gross" That's cuz any dude who has the words 'ew' 'seriously' and 'gross' featured prominently in his diction is into sucking dick. The real test is taking a picture of a woman with some prominent objectively fugly trait, like obesity or excessive hairyness or bad ratios, and then showing it to ten guys and finding that no matter how repulsive the girl you'll always find at least one or two gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 12:28 AM
9

a hot girl is still going to almost always look virtually the same with slight variations in clothing. Says the girl who's 'type' is 6'2" with broad shoulders and good hair. I mean, its cool; no non-incels are offended by women choosing Chad. We get it. But why does every girl have to act like her attraction is some kind of complex, impenetrable mystery?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 10:57 PM
1

Women only want to fuck penises they've placed on pedestals To be pedestalized by a woman forces you to look down upon her, by definition
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 08:47 PM
1

Do you view marriage as primarily based upon companionate love rather than romantic/sexual love? I feel like a lot of people here would disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 02:10 AM
2

No man by woman born shall AMOG me
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:22 PM
3

No he just proved that your point is too simple and unrealistic to actually say anything. What does it mean for two people to be otherwise identical/equal besides attractiveness? There is no universal objective scale to even quantify attractivess, along with countless other human traits that factor into mate selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 10:26 PM
3

Bitch slapped by the Invisible Hand
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 03:31 PM
3

lol smug female cuck actually resorts to bragging about her cuckhood just to win PPDs Most alphaest Hubby contest
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 09:28 PM
1

Was swinging and sexual non monogamy a feature from the beginning of the relationship and, if not, how did you go about transitioning to a lack of sexual exclusivity?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 02:20 AM
0

Let us pretend that is true for a moment, would you give me an account of why most pornographic material is catered towards men and why there is 1000+ pornography subreddits catered to men? Men's greater sex drive and thus more frequent appetite for pornographic content does not negate the possibility that women are just as likely to hold objectifying attitudes about men, nor does it address the apparent double standard in our culture reflected in our media.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 02:03 PM
1

OP is a white chick
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 09:43 PM
3

Some people actually work for a living. There aren't enough sinecure personal assistant jobs to go around.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 07:12 PM
3

True. But important historical events (like 9/11) or watershed technological developments (like the widespread adoption of the internet) can cause a kind of generational punctuated equilibrium. Years of stasis and suddenly everything changes all at once
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 09:48 PM
2

Whenever I read you I swear that deep down in the crypt of your being you're as red as it gets. You are what happens to red pillers when they get older, softer, and drop the fashionable nihilism. This is a compliment btw /u/blackedoutfast is the opposite extreme, peak 'enjoy the decline' and all clear, practical language. /u/Aaren_Augustine is 50% more cryptic, and thus the exact median between the two of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 01:38 AM
1

He was actually pretty funny back when he was notworthmuch
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 07:04 PM
4

Now you just get burned and never smash, bro
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 01:09 PM
3

I don't care if I orgasm at that point, I care way more about whether she does. This self-sacrificial obeisance towards women is exactly the attitude that repulses them. The irony is that by being more selfish about what you want, they get what they want as well: a masculine presence to be enjoyed. Sex is not a zero sum game.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 05:55 PM
5

So live somewhere less shitty I could just as easily say “So live a less shitty lifestyle.” to repulsive self-hating fat people, but this site decided that was wrongthink. You cannot be without a body. And my point was that, even further, you briefly could not be a citizen of this country without being forced to subsidize the poor choices others made with their bodies. Or does the right to bodily autonomy only exist when convenient for arguing pro-choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:05 AM
3

For people in most parts of the country, owning a car is not optional if you want to work and provide for your family. And yet, for a time, it was illegal not to purchase health insurance despite not exposing myself to any optional major risk factors to my health like fatness or smoking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 04:37 AM
5

BearSaint 2.0
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 05:44 AM
0

Well, no. Just show that it doesn’t necessarily follow from solipsism; you’re the one making the claim, it’s incumbent on you to show the connection. No precise definition needed to undermine your attempt. You’re asking him to do your job for you, and then claiming victory when he fails...as would be expected for anyone trying to shoehorn together two so obviously diametrically opposed concepts. And yet this is the hill you have chosen
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 12:33 PM
0

He doesn’t have to define empathy to negate your argument, just demonstrate that it’s basis is not in solipsism. Which is easy if you actually know the definition of solipsism
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:56 AM
3

I see you’ve been to Nola
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 02:53 AM
1

why hasn’t this unfunny troll been banned yet? I’d like to believe it’s just a bot programmed to spit out SJW mad libs if the truth that he’s just a miserable shitposting virgin gone wayward from foreveralone weren’t so much more hilaious and satisfying. Say what you will about Lewis’s cock but at least he’s got it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:11 AM
1

you didn't answer my question though
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 08:03 PM
1

Not every subjective interpretation or alternative worldview is equally valid
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 08:03 PM
3

Surgery is a complex discipline that can involve various unpredictable variabilities and require both precision as well as improvisation (occasionally) to solve difficult problems. The origin of much of that theoretical knowledge is the accumulated empirical findings of past surgeons. And this is how surgeons are trained; even after years of absorbing concepts from textbooks they must still sit-in and observe experienced practitioners before performing on their own. Would you trust a lone surgeo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 07:59 PM
8

There is a big distinction between catching malaria and going on a date with a girl. Contracting malaria is an objective event that can be measured and quantified. Seducing a girl is an intertwining of subjectivities that cannot be fully described 'from the outside' so to speak. There's always an element of unpredictable randomness when dealing with people, especially in a sexual nature. This is your issue. Since you have no sexual experience you assume that the kind of knowledge you're missing …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 07:45 PM
9

I think it's great you chose this example above all others, as it's the classic example of how young children begin to develop general theories about the world; small child touches hot stove and deeply imprints a lesson about reality he'll not soon forget. It's easy to say you'd prefer to learn this lesson from theory, but I promise you that pain is a much more powerful teacher.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 07:33 PM
12

Theories are developed from experimentation, which is square zero for all knowledge. Starting from theory instead will obscure important nuances. All models are false and few are useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 07:23 PM
13

Niles is the BP beta-simp par excellence. His marriage to Maris is exactly the kind of nightmarish hellscape that you find in many a terper's origin story. He never deserved the girl and in real life would never get her, but DHP's portrayal of him made him likable and popular enough that the showrunners felt pressured to give him a happy ending, at which point the show promptly jumped the shark.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 01:07 PM
2

You really think so about Lilith? I mean she's a well-educated, wealthy single mom with a prestigious career and full custody of a young son who appears well adjusted. I agree she's caricaturish in a lot of ways, but that's all sitcoms, especially for a recurring character.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/18 12:57 PM
1

I predict your life will not have a positive outcome
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/18 06:19 PM
2

touché
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 04:14 PM
5

your comments are like atlas-lite, minus her balls
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 04:08 PM
2

True, but it's also fair to say that it's largely a social media mirage. There's always been a party scene, but a sequestered one - because exclusivity is cool. If anything, young people are having less sex now than previous gens, and all the spergy "Party World" alarmism from the Dadosphere happens because social media marketers curate a distorted perspective that the mainstream takes as more widespread than it really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/18 06:10 PM
1

lol as someone who has used public transit in LA, let me tell you, not everyone in Cali is hot
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/18 03:03 PM
4

I agree, but I think it's too often used as a tool to shut down discussion. UMC people telling other UMC people what it's really like to be high value. It just reeks of insecurity and it gets repetitive
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/18 10:15 PM
2

Haha, dudes like that are my favorite. My buddy's dad is a wildly successful local contractor, no degree other than his two year stint in vo-tech. His family has a big plot of land with vehicles and weapons for dayyysss.. God I love rednecks with resources
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/18 10:08 PM
1

What do you think of my suggestion that class oversensitivity is the defining trait of the middle class. Poor people know they're poor; there's nothing to quibble over. Same goes sevenfold for rich people (although if you ask any rich people what it's like to be rich they'll just insist they're poor, because it's easy to joke about being poor when you're loaded)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/18 10:04 PM
5

Didn't realize today was class war day on PPD. Here's the thing. If you're this sensitive to class distinctions, and class consciousness is your primary personality trait, you're almost certainly LMC larping as UMC or UMC larping as UC. No one else gives a fuck. Poor people are too busy struggling and rich people are too secure in their bubble to think about the people crunched in the middle grinding it out to keep the capitalist class floating above the rest of us. Seriously, people here should…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/18 09:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter