TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hitlers_left_nipple Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by hitlers_left_nipple on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

These women were all promiscuous for over a decade, "matured," and married "a very nice man, helping husband, and caring father." were all It would be denying the antecedent if you'd implied the statement "if a woman used to be promiscuous, then she will cheat". But it you don't. Instead, you (perhaps unintentionally) implied "if a woman cheats, then she was once promiscuous" by assuming the history of every woman included in this study.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:51 AM
11

You're missing the point. The idea that "all women desire Chad" is fairly ubiquitous within RP circles - but as OP points out, in actuality this is far from being true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 02:54 PM
2

You'd be surprised. Of course the sub isn't going to be an accurate reflection of our understanding of Red Pill theory - it's used as a reactionary memey circlejerk, not a place of serious discussion (of the theory itself, at least)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 07:01 AM
4

Chiming in to say I'm a woman in my early 20's and NOT in college...and do not experience any attraction whatsoever to men 30+ and nor do any women in my social circle express attraction or interest in dating these men, either
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/18 04:08 AM
2

To be clear, I'm mostly interested in the nature of your platonic relationships with women. My main qualm with your original comment was that you generalized all women as not having "developed personalities to be interesting". However, your examples of uninteresting women exclusively draw from the sub-category of women you're romantically attracted to. This is exactly what I meant by "you may be failing to consider a large percentage of us": I was referring to platonic consideration of personali…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 12:46 AM
1

Yeah, in general you'll find it easier to make friendships you genuinely enjoy in university. But I don't think it's a maturity thing, really - you just haven't been lucky finding like-minded women. Have you sought out friendship with women whom you don't find attractive? You may be failing to consider a large percentage us. It's easy to subconsciously ignore people of the opposite sex who aren't conventionally good looking, especially when you're actively seeking a romantic or non-platonic rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 08:33 PM
3

If you're pursuing a woman for the sake of her company, you're pretty much out of luck, since women generally dont really develop their personalities to be interesting people, so they'll contribute very little to the conversation. Even if you have similar tastes to her or a similar personality, you'll still be expected to carry the conversation and provide all the talking points This stood out to me. What's lead you to believe this? I suspect a lack of substantial platonic relationships with wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 07:00 PM
7

Why is it so hard to believe there's a huge number of women that want to fuck Benedict Cumberbatch??
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 04:31 PM
2

Look, if you disagree with widespread academic consensus I think it's pretty fair to tell you to better educate yourself, lol. I can't respect your disagreement if you don't understand that which you oppose. If you're interested I can link/recommend you some reading on the interplay of sexism/objectification and socialization. Men are more likely to be the victims of violent crime Never said otherwise. This doesn't contradict my point - I'm simply pointing out that women risk rape or physical vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 02:49 AM
1

In many of the situations I described the wrong sort of behaviour (ESPECIALLY physical violence) will lead to getting attacked or raped. Women are physically weaker than men, remember - and even if we weren't, no one wants to put them self in a position of unnecessary danger. Similarly, in cases of innappropriate harassment we are often unable to do anything about it without consequence; if reported in the workplace, for example, women are often at risk of losing jobs (as it's often enacted by m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 08:24 PM
3

The fact remains their exist no forums specific to the topic. General male forums talk about "forever alone" issues just as often (if not more) as their female counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 07:54 PM
3

There aren't forums created specifically for women declaring "they don't need men" or for complaining about lack of male interest. The closest comparison I can think of can be found within the fat activist community - some of their attitudes are similar to that of FA men. But even then, most of their discussions centre around fat activism as opposed to lack of male interest. Male behaviours towards fat women are mostly critiqued for their dehumanizing or dismissive attitudes; the issue of sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 08:31 AM
2

By "force fed" I was referring to unwanted male attention - ex., harassment, catcalling, getting hit on in inappropropriate situations and/or being unable to get away, etc., etc. Obviously, men experience some of these things but the extent to which they occur to women is orders of magnitudes greater. Additionally, due to the nature of our culture - which places disporportionate value on women's looks and sex appeal - the potential negative psychological impact of such treatment is greater for w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 08:15 AM
5

The female equivalent doesn't exist, though. They weren't discounting the existence of self-sufficient men - they were merely pointing out the relative attitude of men as a collective whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:22 AM
10

A more accurate comparison would be starvation vs. getting force-fed spoiled food.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:19 AM
1

-they know what's attractive, they know what women want in a man, and they'll come right out and say it here, but always backpedal if you try to apply it to them, because NAMALT and they are special snowflake outliers. Every. Damn. Time. I'm not sure why you take offence to this. The observable preferences of straight women are merely a trend - obviously they're not going to apply to all women or have similar expression between individuals. It's not contradictory in the slightest to simultaneous…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:00 AM
1

Yes, women obviously have a strong preference for taller men! But it's impossible to tell from this information its RELATIVE desirability to other traits. Which is the point of this post. IQ isn't an enforced requirement because it's less convenient than education as a measure of intelligence - sperm banks are simply unable to provide IQ tests for all their prospective donors.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 02:24 PM
1

...IQ isn't a requirement but education certainly is, as it assumes intelligence/ambition/maturity of the donor. There's no way to measure women's relative preference of either factor (ie, education vs. height) because they're both requirements. And that's the point. The original question focused on the relative desirability of height - which, given the preexisting standards of sperm donors, is impossible to discern from its requirement alone. The only way to test for relative desirability would…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 05:51 AM
1

Yes, but this doesn't prove that height is valued more than other qualities. Due to donor screening processes, the desirable qualities of short male donors are the same as that of taller donors. Therefore, the preference for taller donors simply proves that all other traits being equal, height is valued. It does not, however, prove the desirability of height in relation to other traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 11:32 PM
1

Sorry, should have been more clear. By "good looks" I mean attractive qualities (ex, the appearance of one's face) aside from height. Given the choice between height and "good looks" (so - an appealing face, physical fitness, etc.), women tend to choose the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 04:14 AM
1

necessarily other factors are being viewed as less important than height Sorry, but this is completely unfounded. Preference for taller men does not imply that "other factors are viewed as less important than height" - instead, it simply means that all other traits being equal, taller men will be selected.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 04:11 AM
1

This isn't evidence that women value height over good looks, though . If the only indicator of attractiveness is height, then of course women will prefer to choose taller donors! It's not as if women are being asked to choose between good looks and height.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 02:29 AM
1

If you're interested in "actual evidence", here's a good source.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:18 PM
1

Let's agree to disagree that men and women are generally on equal footing (that's a much larger argument). But I do have to address your claim that "there's no such thing as science favoring men". There is an now a massive amount of evidence women are disadvantaged in STEM fields as a result of gender stereotypes and bias - such evidence has been published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science, and PNAS. To give some examples: this study concludes that gender stereotypes likely have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 11:38 PM
1

You misunderstand me - I am not arguing for retribution. The historic, patriarchal oppression and disenfranchisement of women (or any marginalized demographic, for that matter) continues to have modern-day implications. My justification of female-specific aid/affirmative action lies in a fundamental difference of opinion between you and I: I don't believe that "the fight is over" or that women "have more rights than men"; on a sociocultural level women continue to be marginalized and subjected t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 04:20 AM
1

Not sure why you seem to think I believe women are inherently inferior to men - the reason I listed for women's difficulty in gaining equality with men (i.e., socialized gender expectations and bias) has nothing to do with biological propensity. Women have historically experienced social, economic, and political inequality at the hands of men - such marginalization takes significant effort and consideration to overcome regardless of inherent equality in potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 02:32 AM
1

If men and women were on equal footing to begin with, then sure, this would be unfair preferential treatment. But here's the thing: we're not. Scenarios wherein men and women ostensibly have "equal opportunity" still disporportionately favour men due to socialized gender expectations and bias. Without extra support/affirmative action it'd be impossible (or at the very most take much longer) for women to rise to mens' level.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 11:16 PM
1

Oh, c'mon - isn't the main purpose of this subreddit to come to a better understanding of one another? From this perspective I have much less incentive to "focus on the one I almost got right"; I mean, there's much more to be learned in discussing points of contention... Especially considering you didn't provide supporting arguments in your refutations. So it'd be great if you answered my question: what exactly do you mean by "rationalist"? If not MRAs or Red Pillers - exactly to whom are you re…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 10:43 PM
3

I presented pretty standard and ubiquitous anti-feminist arguments - ones I'ves not only seen within MRA communities, but within Red Pill spheres as well. So I'm not quite sure what you mean "rationalist". Also, I'm assuming by "intellectual failures" you meant examples of logical inconsistency within feminist theory - might wanna be more clear on that next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 01:38 PM
1

LOL, you literally copied the first sentence of wikipedia
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 12:42 PM
3

Not sure I can summarize everything (don't have much time) but here are a few arguments I can think of off the top of my head: -Although third-wave feminists claim their movement sufficiently addresses male gendered issues (ex,. "feminism helps men, too!"), it still places a disproportionate focus on female gendered issues; male discrimination is often downplayed or outright ignored. -Additionally, many popular beliefs within third-wave feminism are harmful to men - an example of this is the con…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 12:19 PM
2

Hmm, some of what you described isn't exactly relevant to the socialization/child development of older teens and adults, though. Liberal feminism has only been popular for the past couple years - the vast majority of older teens and adults have developed with very little exposure to its current concepts (if any!). Although socialization is a lifelong process, cultural influences have most impact during cognitive development. And therein lies another problem - concepts like "#yesallwomen" aren't …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 06:58 PM
6

I'm curious - what's your definition of gynocentric? Because I'd argue the opposite, actually; women are socialized to better relate and empathise with men than vice versa. For example: growing up, girls' primary sources of media disproportionately feature male protagonists. It's also important to note that the presence of a male main character rarely dissuades girls from watching/reading a particular show, movie, or book...while the same cannot be said for boys and female protagonists. This con…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 09:10 PM
3

And your evidence for this is...? Sounds like you're just blindly parroting TRP sidebar theory without any deeper consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 07:16 AM
1

For a lot of women birth control is a necessity though...and in a lot of places, it's still not covered.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter