~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why wasn’t Chirayu Rana kept anonymous in the JPMorgan sexual allegation case?I just wanted to add that, when someone’s identity is not legally protected in a civil suit, the media generally publishes it and the public generally knows those identity information. So it doesn’t really matter what some journalists chooses to do if the information is already public elsewhere, anyway. So my point is that: while what you pointed out is technically correct, it's practically irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 02:44 AM |
| 2 | Why wasn’t Chirayu Rana kept anonymous in the JPMorgan sexual allegation case?Could you cite any high profile case, civil, not criminal, in which the accuser (female) identity is totally hidden without court order ? I do not think there is any. Without the identity being legally protected. Some journalist may choose to hide it, that's there personal decision, some others will choose to include it, that's also their personal decision. And that is what happened in this case too, some reveal, some dont. A strong case to cite against automatic anonymity is the Sean “Diddy” Co… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/26 04:13 AM |
| 12 | Why wasn’t Chirayu Rana kept anonymous in the JPMorgan sexual allegation case?He may have filed as John Doe,but unless there’s a sealing order or anonymity order, journalists can report his identity if they obtain it lawfully. Also, this is a civil lawsuit: person A suing person B. If someone sues you, you generally have the right to know who is suing you. Without a court order protecting anonymity, there isn’t an automatic reason to hide the accuser’s identity. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/26 02:09 AM |
| -5 | Sold my Uber stockYou’re conflating 2 separate issues. First, you criticize government-collected statistics for being biased, yet offer no proof/ alternative source more reliable. That’s convenient: dismiss any inconvenient data as “biased” ,then declare your "critical thinking" right by default. Second, your claim that rape laws are “gender coded” is outdated in many countries. Most modern legal systems have gender-neutral definitions of rape. Just look it up, don't be lazy. If you’re still stuck in decades-old … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/25 10:21 PM |
| -11 | Sold my Uber stockIt's true, studies can be of low quality. It's important to look for high quality/peer reviewed ones. They are far superior tools than social media to help us understand and have an informed view on anything. Edit: Apparently saying "trust data over outrage social media posts" is controversial in this sub. Impressive. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/25 08:18 PM |
| -9 | Sold my Uber stockThat's why it's important to look at statistics instead of relying on social media algorithm. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/25 07:45 PM |
| -5 | Sold my Uber stockDefine sexist. If your definition is simply: any discrimation base on genders, there are many form of widely accepted sexist behaviour, like gender-based bathroom, genderbased scholarship, military conscription, insurance pricing, ... etc | /r/MensRights | 23/07/25 07:40 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter