TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hoere_des_heeren Archive

View 0 posts and 174 comments by hoere_des_heeren on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I don't care about "my value" or whatever that means but I have a low of opinion of anything that "wants a relationship"; if it wants sex with me then that it's business and I find it neither a compliment nor an insult, merely practical if the feeling is mutual. Truth be told it probably reflects poorly on me if something wants a relationship with me: it means at least one idiot likes me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 09:06 PM
10

I noticed this happening heavily with males after a certain age around 22-25 they loose the ability to "talk" it seems; they need to "do stuff together" but there is no real conversation and the rare times that there is it's always about politics and never about life which is why I no longer have any male friends any more. I don't think I changed; they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 08:58 PM
1

I'm just saying there is no reason for it to be a "charity".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 08:10 PM
1

Every man has a price and everything is for sale. Sex—like everything else—is a product that can be acquired with sufficient funds.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 08:03 PM
1

Yes, most male humans do, so do most female humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 01:18 PM
2

The slut/virgin analogy is stupid simply because a "slut" whatever the sex achieves its goal. It wants lots of sex and gets it. The majority of virgins are not virgins by choice a slut not by choice is called a serial rape victim; most virgins want to lose their virginity but cannot achieve that goal. Now I personally don't see much merit into "shaming" individuals for trying to achieve goals and failing but to shame one for being a "slut" is just criticizing a personal life choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 01:26 AM
1

I have a pretty hard policy that turned from subconscious to conscious to avoid any and all words that everything has a different definition or not. Believe it or not but I use language to communicate and express ideas and I find that using a word of which I have no confidence that the listener has the same conception of as I hinders that purpose greatly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 11:46 AM
3

The maximum sentence for rape where I live is 8 years. But the US is known for its long jail times and it's working so well, together with the US mentality of "make them suffer" instead of "rehabilitate them"; it's working so well—retributive justice is God's gift to God's country!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 09:59 PM
1

Once when I broke up with my ex she screamed "Youre only an 8 anyway!" I always considered myself a 7 but on my scale 10 doesnt exist so in a way that is an 8🤔 Because these scales are designed in a dumb way. Rather one should give percentiles like "I consider you to be more aesthetic than 75% of human beings".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 12:51 PM
0

Do "women" care so much about that? Do "women" wear high heels? When I walk outside maybe less than 1% of females is waring high heels—I pity the fool. A good 20% is smoking though; honestly I can respect it more if you do unhealthy shit for a drug high than simple fashion. Personally, I think the fact that women still obsess over being shorter than the guy is proof that gender roles aren't going anywhere anytime soon, even with feminism claiming to get rid of them. What is "obsessing" over that…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 11:16 AM
2

Most soldiers are male, most murderers are male, most suicides are male even though females are more often depressed, even proportionally to the number of soldiers males are more often posthumously rewarded for giving their life for the team in armies. I think males are on average more willing to both kill and die to achieve a goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 12:22 AM
-1

Depression isn't actually higher amongst males. Males just have more of a "get it done" mentality overall; I also think that testosterone is probably a hormone that makes one both more willing to kill and die to achieve a goal. Why are most suicide bombers male eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 09:47 PM
1

Correction: Why does some specific subset of the media does so?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 07:58 PM
2

Yes by some, no by others? You don't honestly think there is a universal constant to this right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 06:51 PM
1

Ehh, what case study are you thinking off?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 03:03 PM
1

Looking at those numbers I'm pretty sure the way they count does not add up to 100%. 91% of new homes in this stat are "purchased by females"; new homes are often purchased by two individuals one male, one female, so they count as both. I'm pretty sure that when the same stat is calculated for males it arrives at like 70% or something and the number just adds up to more than 100 because if it's a two-man purchase they add it to both. This "60%" number is designed to arouse the impression that fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 02:35 PM
5

"unwanted sexual attention"; sexual harassment is a legal term and a crime and I doubt walking up to a citizen and requesting a deed of a sexual nature qualifies in most jurisdictions. Incidentally it qualifies where I live for a different far more minor crime; it is actually not legal in a lot of major Dutch cities to walk up to a stranger and make a remark of a sexual nature without a good faith belief that this will be reciprocated and you need only a minor good faith basis; you don't need co…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 02:19 PM
2

I'm sure some are but that's a marginalized fringe movement in the same way some humans believe that the Earth is flat or that Vaccines cause autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 02:17 PM
12

Not at all—if a male walked up to random males and asked them to fuck it would be considered strange at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 11:33 AM
1

"means. gay means looks like a faggot Being muscular, having short hair, and a jawline that looks like cubism like they always have in þe olde gayporn? I agree—they look like faggots. and certainly no beliefs based in "tradition" Oh please, this standard of "masculinity" you talk about is some random arbitrary cultural shit that's like 150 year old western stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 09:07 AM
2

I don't care about all that ancilliary social stuff: I'm simply opposed to any law which considers gender in any way and don't believe it should ever be a legal category that makes a difference. Apart from that my opinion of those who go to a place like Bumble is generally low or rather tthey're not compatible with me. I don't like to be judged on my gender. A far simpler answer both for bumble and real life is a recognizable and legally enforced "do not approach me" sign or symbol that one can …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 08:45 AM
1

That is typically the case in those situations. However, there are other situations where the guy doesn't make his intentions clear to the woman, but it's obvious that he is interested in her. These guys are commonly conflated with "nice guys." Who is talking about "the guy" and "the woman"? You seem to make this oddly gendered. Yes, this is basically what monogamous relationships are. Do you not understand the concept of "mate-guarding" and, in doing so, an animal (or human) is claiming the oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 10:05 PM
0

I'm not sure what you're trying to say with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 03:03 PM
1

If you need to hit the gym to not be skinny-fat or chubby you need to probably just eat healthier or bike to work or something. If you need to use the gym to not be fat there is something else weird about your lifestyle. Most humans who don't go to the gym just look normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 11:18 AM
1

Give me an example of what you think of "muscular". Let's say this. And handsome isn't all that subjective. You can definitely see patterns on what women find attractive in general. How does that not make it subjective? Is musical taste not subjective now because a top 40 exists?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 11:03 AM
1

Not at all, I'm just saying that handsome and muscular is gross because muscular is gross and 'handsome' is a super subjective term anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 10:51 AM
1

I love the word femoid. Really males should be called "moids" and then we have perfection.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 10:47 AM
2

"handsome and muscular", yes—that's a gayporn thing mostly targeted at other males.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 10:45 AM
2

So do all those females who don't lift weights look "scrawny" to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 10:41 AM
1

Maybe they do but the complement of muscule isn't "scrawny"; one can be both not muscular and not scrawny at the same time such as the picture that I linked.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 09:53 AM
0

We want to stick our dicks in you. This is an urge that has been programmed into us after millions of years of evolution. To you it may seem like want, but to men it often feels like a need. If you are wondering if the man standing next to you wants to stick his dick in you, assume he does. No, that's you and yes that seems to be more common amongst males than females; some males don't have that need and some females do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 09:52 AM
1

If he was obviously making advances while she was in a relationship, that’s a sleazy thing to do. I disagree with this perspective: if you continue to make advances when the object has made it clear it doesn't want you to continue then it's sleazy but this whole code against "stealing someone's lover" is not about respecting the lover but respecting the other; it's basically treating humans like property of "the other sex" and respecting the "first come first served" shtick of "Oh someone alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 09:25 AM
2

I was also surprised by the tone of the responses from many women who essentially claimed it was a terrible crime to ask a friend out after her previous relationship ended. It's a TwoX "support topic"; the unofficial rule is that if you make a "support topic" without a villain it'll get downvoted because your life just sucks and there's no one to collectively get angry on and if there is a villain you upvote and you in no way "support" the victim but just get angry at the villain which makes the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 09:21 AM
1

The complement of "muscles" is also not "scrawny". Would you call this muscular?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 09:09 AM
0

You know what—most males don't seem to like it when females are "muscular" and neither do I. I imagine it's more or less exactly the same because I have the same response to muscular males as I do to muscular females "gross".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 09:06 AM
1

This is one of the strangest things on the Internet. Yeah, women love a muscular look. This is not rocket surgery. Most females absolutely love a Micheal Phelps/Alex Honnold look. How is this an answer to my question? It's also false.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 05:52 AM
1

How does that in any way establish that most females like a muscular look? It's simple: the percentage of those that do—however small it is—will now notice you and find you attractive and respond accordingly, even if that percentage is only 5%. Those that don't; even if it's 95% will have not noticed you before and will continue to not notice you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 05:37 AM
6

And "as they do" is that Tom Cruise has next to no female fans compared to the horde of male fans that it enjoys. How many Tom Cruise films are popular with a female audience? Shirtless and muscular doesn't at all seem to a common trope in films that have a large female viewing demographic; where do you even get from that that is "as females do"? that ideal mostly stems from a male power fantasy and repressed male homoeroetic desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 05:09 AM
4

Agreed—I think both "skinny fat" and "handsome and muscular" look revolting and I'm pretty sure that's a very common opinion. Where do people even get this idea from that "handsome and muscular" are so in vogue? watching too much gayporn? Try yoai once in a while for a more balanced perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 05:03 AM
1

You say so but the only females who are interested in older-looking males are those who pray after their money. Rich as fuck females who can afford to go after males purely for their looks are notorious for their taste in young prettyboys because they're legitimately purely going for the looks and not after the money. In the end all the male pop stars that have a large female fanbase are youthful prettyboys. There's a reason Loki is the most popular MCU character with females; every male lead in…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 03:37 PM
1

Where does OP's post in any way specify the sex of the individuals it wants to fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 01:11 PM
3

Most males also don't want to do that; that's just you. There are very few human beings who "want to fuck everything".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 01:09 PM
0

What's this "responsibility" and what are these "benefits" exactly? In most places there is no "responsibility" to not cheat and the benefits are pretty scarce compared to the disadvantages. Marriage is something only the biggest fools do out of sentimental reasons; they like the label and they end up due to that doing what comes down to signing a contract they didn't read which for mysterious reasons is binding even without a meeting of the minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 01:07 PM
0

Ehh, what is "being used for sex" is that just a term for someone who has sex with you who doesn't want a relationship when you do? Yeah I'm sure that sometimes happens to male human beings... is that not a no-brainer?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 01:04 PM
4

I'm female and I don't wear makeup and there's no real reason "why"? Typically individuals have a reason to do things, not to not do things. Why don't I dye my hair blond? I don't know I just don't, never really thought about doing it seriously, same with makeup.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 11:44 AM
1

Rule 3 is there due to the usual feminist response: "men's tax rates are higher (the rate, not the amount. I.e. men pay 11.25% of income, women 8% of income. Thus even if a woman earns the same she pays 3.25% less.)" "Yeah,but women birth children so that's not sexism". That's a stupid argument; tax laws tax the same based on sex but the amount paid is just not linear. That males on average pay more taxes has nothing to do with male but just that they make more income. You can find discriminatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 11:40 AM
1

I scarcely had more than one menstruation per year and they were pretty mild—I can live with it. Going bald would give me a good excuse to just shave it and wear wigs though which I've been wanting to try for a while but if I don't like it I loose the hair I've been growing for over a decade. It should also be noted that androgenetic alopecia is hardly a male constant: it mostly affects those with blood from around Europe and North Africa: this map is about indigenous population only: as you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 10:42 AM
1

Hygiene has fuck all the to do with skin care and other aesthetic thigs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 11:49 AM
3

In what world do males not have this "right"? Every famous male actor in every public appearance is covered with it. The problem with systemic cosmetic enhancements is that if everything is doing it then what used to be a 8 now just becomes a 6 again. So at the end of the day when it's all set and done everything invests a lot more effort but nothing was gained.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 11:48 AM
1

Ehh, I meant "oral sex" there, not "anal sex", no idea why I typed the latter. My point is that that place is full of posts who complain about their sexual partners finding performing oral sex disgusting; it's a super common thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 12:23 AM
1

Lol, you should check out r/sex and see how many there complain about their partners find the thought of doing anal sex disgusting. It's a very, very common thing because genitals are fucking disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 09:56 PM
1

"queer" in this case seems to be commonality then. It seems to be super common for human beings to find generals to be unappealing in general because they just don't look that appealing to the honest; the penis looks like an ugly taproot and the sac hanging nearby isn't too good looking either and a vulva practically looks like an open flesh wound.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 09:06 PM
1

So again, all those individuals who find neither cunnilingus nor fellatio appealing but stil enjoy having sex? are those asexual despite enjoying sex or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 06:59 PM
1

The Mosuo structure has historically not been unusual even in patriarchical societies; it's called an avunculate family structure and is very common in extended family opposed to nuclear family structures because there's not really another way about it. But in an avunculate society a male is not responsible to its own biological offspring but to the biological offspring of its female siblings and other relatives. That's the only way "extended families" can ever work in a binary reproductive syst…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 03:26 PM
1

who said ASEXUAL? what is wrong with how all of you read? No one said, hence I asked/ a human who is disgusted by the genitals of the sex with whom it is engaging is sex acts is not "attracted" to that sex. Okay, then I'm not attracted to any sex, does that make me asexual? despite having sex and enjoying it? It seems to be a very common complaint on r/sex that a lot of males find vulvae disgusting? So what are these males then? asexual? homosexual? if you are a STRAIGHT person who engages in ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 01:40 PM
1

So to be clear I'm asexual despite enjoying sex just because I don't enjoy giving or receiving oral sex? Also a male who has no interest in having sex with males and does not enjoy giving females oral sex either is like what? asexual? homosexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 01:26 PM
1

It's almost like "sexual orientations" are a useless descriptor and are just self-identified labels of no biological but purely social significance. 140 years back German psychiatrists invented the concept of "homosexual" to classify what they considered socially deviant behaviour as a "mental disorder" as psychiatrists love to do. It's been 140 years since then and thee is still no objective materalistic test to determine "sexual orientation" beyond asking the subject what it self-identifies as…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 11:00 AM
5

So what if you like both whites and blacks? What if you like both curly hair and straight hair? Is it the same story there?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 10:55 AM
3

You're deluding yourself anyway if you think that of yourself. Every single thing on the planet settles; you're not the most desirable human on the planet for your SO and it always wants improvements that you can never hope to provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 10:51 AM
1

I've had sex with females and enjoyed it; never in my fucking lifetime am I going to do cunnilingus and I consider that shit disgusting and I'm not particularly interested in "scissoring" either, nor in PIV for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 10:34 AM
1

Not I, but over at r/bisexual it seems to be the norm to make the distinction. Females should have a penis too, really. I think a lot of bullshit I don't tolerate most individuals don't tolerate honestly, but only of one sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 10:32 AM
2

And that is why I am not particularly impressed with being "approached" for social matters by those who know nothing about me. Now of course if they overheard my talking to someone else about something and they are like "I couldn't help but overhear what you said and ..." and a nice conversation comes from that that'd be entirely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 06:07 PM
4

I've seen agreement amongst multiple women on PPD/askreddit that an approach by a guy can turn him from a tiny blip on their radar into something much more than that, as though that guy isn't really desirable (even if he's very attractive) until he approaches. As long as he does not approach, he may be nice to look at but as far as dating goes, he isn't an option. Do you feel this way? Everything is a tiny blip on my radar until I speak to it so if they strike up a conversation the blip might be…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 05:38 PM
2

I wonder if it's just like this in the US and if I'd have better luck in Europe finding what I'm looking for. I'm really at a loss at this point. You'll have a hard time finding people in Europe that are as "conservative" as the average US resident. From the perspective of the average European citizen the US is an absurdly religious place whose social values are 40 years in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 05:35 PM
1

What "culture" teaches anyone this? I first heard of this idea when I was like 29 on reddit or something on subs like this one. I have never been taught anything of the sort by any culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 09:48 AM
2

Semantics—marriage is a "legal status" because it dates from a time where females could not sign a contract on their own and needed a male with the power of attorney over them—either their parent or spouse—to do so. Naturally in such a case a contract between spouses made no sense so they hardcoded marriage into the law but it still functions as a contract. If females were able to sign contracts from day 1 under their own agency marriage would never have existed and it would have been a normal c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 09:25 PM
0

Some are, some aren't. Do men’s emotions disgust you? Is there a context where it’s for men to cry or be sad without turning you off? Or is an expressive man okay? Emotional humans annoy me—this is not a gender thing. I've a very low tolerance of sentimentality, irrationality, and exuberance and those three things are completely unrelated qualities that need not go hand in hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 09:18 PM
1

Pretty much, females also come to the defence of females more than that of males and all come to the defence of minors of either sex more. "women and children first" is an ingrained social belief eh—I don't think it has much to do with scoring at all unless they all want that sweet catholic choirboy arsehole.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:00 PM
1

Would you think for practical purposes that this is a reasonable(sensible and logical) belief to hold and mantra to repeat to herself? If you're going this far to protect yourself you might as well believe it in the same way of every single human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:07 PM
1

Isn't this a clear cut example of the "Female privilege" that women enjoy? Men like Louis CK and Aziz Ansari were raked over the coals for doing a lot less than what Cardi B has admitted to have done. How are men supposed to take things like #metoo seriously after seeing double standards like these? Yes, but with the exception that it's not unitary but binary. With sexual assault there's a perpetrator and a victim. By and large society only cares if the perpetrator is male and the victim is fema…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:05 PM
6

Okay, let's limit to romantic and/or sexual interaction I'm saying that whilst originally the MGTOW movement was a bona fide abstinence from all that it's been watered down completely and most members of the MGTOW movement nowadays partake copiously in romantic and sexual interaction with the opposite sex; it has therefore lost its very raison d'être; the point was "I think the game is unfair so I'll just refuse to play it" and I can respect that but nowadays it's just a place of complaining abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 12:22 PM
9

Because "feminism" isn't a genderswap of MGTOW? I'm not criticizing MRA's here on this argument now am I? I'm criticizing a group that claims that avoid female contact but nowadays really no longer does. Neither feminism nor MRA's big supposed shtick is "I avoid interacting with the opposite sex". If you call yourself a feminist separatist however and you're still married to a male then yeah you're not really being a separatist now are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 12:09 PM
2

There's a reason r/relationships exists but not /r/friendships Everything is asking about "relationship advice" but not about friendship advice which is generally smooth sailing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:19 AM
10

It used to legitimately be males that stopped being interested in romantic interaction or interaction at all with females because they felt it wasn't rewarding and was stacked against them—respect if you actually put your money where your mouth is. Most individuals who bitch about "the opposite sex" that way seem to still continue to go on and on wanting to court their favour. It turned out that like any movement it attracted those like the latter so originally it turned into that you could stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:47 AM
3

Jesus Christ—this whole "provide" crap is 50 years outdated. Independent female income exists. The only party that "provides" me with anything is the state; I'm an adult approaching midlife crisis; I'm not "provided" by any other party.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:44 AM
1

The consensus doesn't extend beyond the consensus of "attractive".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:26 AM
2

No that's the problem; everything has a different idea of what a "chad" or "alpha" is. That's another thing of "chad" and "alpha"; that it acts like it's universal and everything acts like everything else has the same definition of it but when a topic arises which asks "what is an alpha really?" it's revealed that everything has a different definition of what an "alpha" is and the all contradict each other. Kind of like "pansexual".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:19 PM
4

"alpha" is just a fancy scientific-sounding word for "what the speaker subjectively considers to be attractive"; when you call it "alpha" instead of "[subjectively] attractive" it makes it sound more scientific I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:11 PM
2

Freud claimed that every 12 year old female goes through that stage so the "consequences" would just be 'being female and being older than 12', yeah? Freud also made this claim in a very different time clearly since it claimed that around that age 12 year old females first realize they don't have a penis. Since this is the 21st century I showered naked together with children of the opposite sex including my own sibling from a young age so I was well aware of this anatomical difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:55 PM
2

If you're talking about "penis envy"; Freud claimed that was a "stage of psychosexual development" that occurred in 12 year old females. I'm like three times as old as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:40 PM
2

That the opposite sex needs to ejaculate and that my sex lacks a penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:04 PM
1

There's still no advantage except for the label so why would you? This is like saying "crossing the street with your eyes closed is not a bad idea because it's unlikely you'll get scooped by a car"; if you do you pay for it dearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:59 AM
1

There's usually such a thing as legal bankrupcy if you can't make your debts any more. Your wages will be garnished for the rest of your life yes to make that debt but you will keep some of your wages to still have a humane existence so the creditor will never recover the entire debt. If you're married they can go after your spouse's assets before bankrupcy is reached. Your spouse can come home one night with say a giant gambling debt or a huge debt due to accidental property damage and suddenly…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 09:48 AM
1

Marriage is a bad deal for all parties involved except if one party plans to screw the other over from the start that is only followed through with because of sentimental reasons. Marriage—legally speaking—is business and a very poor form of business that individuals continue to get into because they hold sentimental attachment to the label; 99% of those who get married don't even actually read up on what it legally entails nor do they understand it. It's like making your company a publicly trad…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:19 PM
2

And yet people often still want to believe they were the best when it's not the longest one and when they are confronted with the reality that they are not they emotionally collapse hence lying to your fellow man to stop that from happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:09 PM
2

And this expectation that you'd be the last is equally deluded. The ones before you also had that. But regardless of how realistic those expectations are: that's why there's so much lying eh—people want to keep that delusion alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:57 PM
6

Because they can and for males it's harder to fake an orgasm obviously. Outside of orgasms males lie just as much about the quality of sex. I mean there was a topic on this very sub a while back which revealed just how many cannot handle the idea that the best sex others are having is not with them... that's just not statistically likely if they had a more than one prior sexual partner that you're going to be the best but people really want to believe that it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:50 PM
2

I believe that paternity tests should be mandatory by law if the claim of legal parenthood is based on assumption of biological relationship. This is 2019—there is no reason to "assume" these things any more. Also, I don't do this whole sexual exclusivity thing so yeah, but then again I also don't do this whole "SO" thing or this whole "having children" thing or this whole "caring about the biological relationship between legal parent and legal child thing".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 10:43 AM
1

Are you asking "would" or "do"? I habitually fuck some friends of mine but I'd assume that that doesn't really tell you much.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:44 AM
1

Let me ask you a simple question: would you fuck Brad Pitt? No way in fucking hell. Are his abs playing a role in your decision? That is the least of my concerns. I am most assuredly not attracted to shorthairs and apart from that It's almost surely just not someone I'd feel comfortable being naked around.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 10:51 PM
1

If a male can't orgasm during MF-sex the typical response is "go see a doctor; this is a medical problem" if a female can't the typical response is "the male is doing something wrong". Reason again being that males have full control and it's very easy to make yourself orgasm when you have full control so failure to achieve it is probably indicative of this. That's not how I have sex at all though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 04:17 PM
2

The problem with "dating apps" (opposed to "hookup apps") is that in general success kills clients. A dating app achieving what it set out to supposedly do as in find you a lover leads you quitting the app so they are designed around giving you a sense that you are making progress but also ensure that you don't actually become taken. In any case I would make a neural AI that would learn about good matches and match people based on that. It would read and parse profiles and learn from that and tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 03:43 PM
1

There is a major gender imbalance though here that I often point out in that how it often works is that in MF-sexual intercourse there is some unwritten rule that the male party is the one "taking control". Therefore the male satisfaction depends very little on the skill of the female because the female isn't doing much to begin with and the male dictates most of it. Which is why a lot of females complain about lack of sexual satisfaction; essentially I notice a common pattern that they complain…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 03:40 PM
1

I disagree; on this sub arguments are constantly made that assume the nonexistence of exceptions. The very phrase "awalt" affirms the nonexistence of exceptions explicitly; that's what "all" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 02:23 PM
1

I have never phrased that opinion as an absolutism and have always said things like "males overestimate how much females on average like muscles" or "in general females do not like muscles as much as males tend to think they do" and various phrases which make it clear it's not an absolutism. The only reason you perceive a statement that was clearly phrased as a correlation as an absolutism is because you're incapable of mentally comprehending non-absolutisms which seems to be very common on this…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 09:54 AM
1

Under the condition that "no relationship" is somehow not an option. At the point of non-monogamy "relationship" really just becomes one of those useless sentimental labels which it already is plenty even with sexual exclusivity—I'm not a fan of such useless sentimental labels. In any case I'm the antithesis of jealous and have no desire whatsoever to control the sex life of anyone nor to have my own be controlled and as said I have a very low opinion of all these sentimental labels people often…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 10:14 PM
3

If you ask this forum what an "actual alpha" is everything will give a different definition typically contradicting the others. It's a buzzword kept vague to obfuscate the idea that everything has a different definition thereof.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 10:06 PM
2

Every human being should be mistrustful of every other human being. Homo homini lupus est.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 10:53 AM
2

Some of them, not others, and other individuals who also happen to be female humans would have a different list of things they could do...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 10:32 PM
2

Of all the things you listed I'm some individuals who are female humans do that and others don't... I don't see why this would be remotely hard to see for any human being; I do two of the things on that list myself sometimes and others do others. PPD has this obstacle it seems to admit the simple and obvious thing that to most of the questions asked here the simple answer is "some do; some don't."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 10:14 PM
2

Also, you never seen someone say "men are strong, man up", "Women are more agreeable" and such? You never even heard of the area of psychometrics by gender? seriously? Nope. It is a great part of contemporary feminism theory "feminists" are also something the internet just talks about that you will never meet in real life; it's a super extreme type you'll only encounter in specific spaces on the internet but never in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 03:18 PM
2

As usual, it depends on the individual? Some don't want children at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 02:40 PM
3

That's a big part of it but also beliefs of gender absolutisms, this whole "negging" approach; "males are like this; females are like that". I have never met anyone outside of communities like that who seriously hold such beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 01:00 PM
2

...no? This whole idea that females are so interested in muscles seems to be only believed on the internet. In real life everyone seems to know it's nonsense. I mean come on a completely mainstream show like Johnny Bravo in the 90s already poked fun at the niche belief that some males have that females are all about muscles, shirtless males, and looks. Aside from that one classmate I have never met anyone outside of communities like this one specifically designed around it who beliefs that stuff…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 12:37 PM
1

I have never seen a "red pill" in my life in real life—this is some internet meme that stays on the internet like most of these things everyone hotly debates on the internet like they are super common but you'll never encounter them. The closest I got was some (male) classmate who got some English evolutionary-psychology based book on courtship believing it to be the holy grail to find success or something—never found out whether it'd end up being successful or not but the consensus in the class…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 11:40 AM
1

Everything is for sale and every man has their price. "paid enough" can be the achievement of total world peace as a price or enough money to realize that goal. I'd of course sell my own children if the price was world peace or a cure for a variety of bad conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 02:59 PM
1

Both men and women know and expect that it's men who express their interest, seduce the woman, and escalate. Men think chivalry will do it, women think it won't. I was initially explaining why "men feel the need to". Some do; some don't again. It's also highly cultural. It's a common studied theme of cultural conflicts where people are a bit at a loss what to do when they go to a culture where it's different. In the culture I live it's customary in male-female courtship for the female to take th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 11:53 AM
0

Those who claim they don't are still doing it, they do it less than other women, so they feel like they're not doing it. But compared to men, they do. Just like men can be short but will still be taller than most women, they're not tall compared to men, they're still taller than women. You have posters in this thread implying they are female and claiming the behaviour is obnoxious or silly. You can't get much lower than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 11:36 AM
2

Yes, women feel like it's men's responsibility to seduce them and to escalate. Some do; some don't. You literally see in this very thread a very diverse set of opinions regarding this. Even when they're in couple. And men have to do these if they want anything to happen. What do you want to do? You can't really change women's nature. Ah yes, welcome to r/purplepilldebate where it seems everyone and its dog seems to find the very basic and simple reality that individual humans have their own indi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 11:23 AM
1

Maybe so but why isn't it in reverse? How do they decide which will open the door open for which and my guess is that that is going to be the male for the female. Apart from that I see this behaviour quite often with individuals who are not in any way "partnered up" where males feel they need to hold the door open for females or females feel males owe it to them to open doors for them. Apart from that this is also just "nice" in a way that wastes my time. The effort I save from not opening the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 10:10 AM
0

I would— I very much dislike it if being "nice" to me is conditioned upon my sex. I kind of like to earn my treatment with some actual tangible merit opposed to having it as birthright due to genitals.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 09:08 AM
1

Dumb and inefficient—seems more inefficient to just open your own door and get out. Gender roles are also silly—especially when they waste everyone's time like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 09:07 AM
1

Do you really summe that all or at least all female "require marriage" after some time? I negatively require marriage: marriage is an absurd outdated legal construct that is mostly entered into out of sentimental value. All the parts of marriage that are not horrible can be achieved by simple contracts. The only reason "family law" even exists is because it predates females being allowed to sign their own contracts; the only reason it exists is because it's essentially a very fucked up "contract…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 08:32 AM
3

Women can get sex any time they want. So can males—just like females—from males they aren't interested in having sex with. What they need men for, primarily, are resources, labour and portection. I do not need anything but the state for any of that. And guess what, the state mandates all of those things are provided for women and taken from men, for the most part. How are they taken from males and provided for females by the state? What men need from women are sex and reproduction. And guess wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 08:40 AM
1

And how exactly do they have ripped boyfriends with square jaws because for one that physique isn't even common? In the end the simple maths is that the majority of males with a female SO are not like that simply because most males are not like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 09:21 PM
4

Apparently not because as I said research indicates females have a higher rate of self-reported happiness with their single status than males, live longer doing so whilst males live shorter doing so and report higher levels of happiness rather than lower levels that males do when single.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:40 PM
6

That's obviously not the "love" I'm talking about; that's platonic love, not romantic love.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 04:56 PM
0

The point is that there's less concern now than there was before it. My guess is going to be that it polarized though; the average may have gone down but I'd wager that for some it went up and for others down.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 01:35 PM
2

I think a better explanation of the common difference is that females more often are the type that does not need love or sex per se and isn't actively looking but when it happens it happens and it's still nice whereas males more often are the type that are actively looking for both.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 01:26 PM
1

There seems to be a very pervasive belief amongst males that the average female is interested in the bodybuilder look and cares about a 6pack. I'm sure some do but the majority does not care one bit. There seems to really big a very pervasive idea in male circles that there's a certain idea which seems to mostly be a power fantasy of males pertaining to masculinity that females are interested in that. There's a reason that all films that portray that stuff have next to no female fans and it almo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 09:49 AM
66

PRetty much all research on the matter seems to indicate that females are far more comfortable being single and sex deprived than males on average. They often say "males want sex; females want a relationship" but I feel that even that is nonsense; males still want a relationship more than females; the difference is just not as profound as with sex so it creates that impression. The only reason females were historically very interested in marriage is because it was a matter or survival back then.…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 09:44 AM
1

"feminine" vs "masculine" is like "left wing politics" vs "right wing politics" as in a bunch of completely arbitrary things grouped in one camp and bunch of completely arbitrary things in the other. The only way someone can seriously be "feminine" or "right wing" is if they put themselves into a box and follow the box I do not live my life around granting respect to such arbitrary lines drawn in the sand.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 04:03 AM
1

Ehh, isn't rejecting whislt wanting to remain friends what friendzoning is? The only way to reject without firendzoning is to not want to see them again...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 01:06 PM
1

Tinder is basically openly a place where you get judged based on your looks yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 06:13 PM
1

One significant event happened in between obviously and that was the whole "MeToo" thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 12:12 PM
2

Many people in The Red Pill community have the belief that men and women want sex as much as each other, but the nature of their sex drive is different. Whereas men sexually desire almost any woman, women only sexually desire the top 10-20% of men. In other words, give a bottom 60% woman a top 10% male, she will want sex as much (if not more) than him. But this theory is a contradiction in itself There is no "the top 20%"; this is the problem with this claim that is often made based on Tinder re…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:04 AM
6

The big thing is that there is also a difference between how high your libido is and how selective you are and people often confuse them. I'm pretty much willing to have sex with anyone I'm comfortable enough to cuddle but I could very easily live the rest of my life without sex and I really don't need it. As in: if you want sex more, your standards are logically much lower. This is absolutely a fallacy; there are a lot of individuals with very high sex drive but nevertheless are very selective …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:03 AM
2

Some do; some don't; I've seen plenty of counter examples and these absolutist statements are never true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 06:24 AM
3

Most of all this "masculine vs feminine" line is some bullshit nonsensical way to categorize that. I daresay that murderous impulses is a masculine trait—who prefers those really? I'd also say that technical insight is—great, no disadvantage there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 06:24 AM
2

"who cares" is not at all a defence that being a virgin at 25 is at the very least statistically unusual contrary to your claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 06:21 AM
1

Wonder Woman is women aspiring to be masculine. Guys don't like that. They want feminine women. So what.. they have their dilussioned shattered because real life is not how the media portrays it and they're sad about that but they don't like what's in the media either?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 01:32 AM
0

To be fair in the media their male love interests are also a lot more handsme, brave, bold and whatnot than the male average on the street. One assumes that when one's own attractiveness goes up the boldness does so too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 12:38 AM
1

Then why don't they have it about all the other lofty lied ideas that schools basically come to students with and lie with as a matter of propaganda? But then again I'm sure they get hit just as hard when they're stuck with a public defender for the first time because they can't afford a good lawyer and realize all this talk about fair trial and everyone gets an adequate legal defence to be the same poopydong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 12:35 AM
1

At 16, boys look like dorks. ...user... on... internet... has... different subjective opinion... must... resist... urge... to... call "troll".... Men are the sexiest from 23-35. 16 year old boys are not sexually attractive, at least not to adult women. Now why is r/ppd always filled with those who cannot fathom individuals having their own individual subjective opinions. Probably because this discussion in general does not work if you do because the answer to every question and every discussion …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 09:07 AM
1

Oh you're several years older than me! Well you know you're still young as fuck because 30 is the new 20 remember? I never said I considered myself old; I just said I'm not a middle school kid. I have most of my life ahead of me yet and my body is showing no signs of slowing down. Anyway this post is about how to age well (that's what the phrase "age like wine" means), and you're claiming that we humans peak at 16 (which is false btw), and at age 16 one is literally underdeveloped and still grow…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:43 AM
1

I'm early thirties bub. And I'm hardly the only one on this sub who says that; the difference is that it's usually males about females rather than females about humans. If a 33 year old male says that females are at their aesthetic peak around 16 and then start to degrade no one on this sub would bat an eye but apparently if you're female and just think that in general about human beings you must be very young.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:18 AM
1

Because "trolling" is your word for "saying things I disagree with" apparently? Apparently you disagree with that human beings in general reach their aesthetic peak around 16 and that there are things more aesthetic than humans in this world... that's like... your opinion man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 07:52 AM
1

Yes, lying is effective in getting what you want in general if what you want is not "retain your honour" and you don't get caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 07:47 AM
2

I'm celibate because I think there are prettier things than humans on this planet?—give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 07:40 AM
2

Not physically age past 16 or something at which point I feel humans reach their physical attractiveness peak and it's al downhill from there but who gives a shit because human beings are ugly anyway in comparison to cats or plants or whatever. If I fucked things over how pretty they are I would put houseplants up my arse but it doesn't work that way eh.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 06:45 AM
-1

I find this phrase to be stupid; you always use each other for sex; if you play a game of chess against each other you also use each other; when I go to the store to buy bread I am using the employers there and they in turn are using me and my money. It's the usual "love vocabulary" where terms are vague and have no real meaning and are basically used to arouse an emotional response rather than to actually communicate anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 06:43 AM
0

That doesn't change that the natural look isn't "ripped" or "looks like they work out".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 10:56 PM
1

I disagree, but Im not sure what you mean by 'ripped'. Jason Mamoa is fucking ripped and is shirtless in all of his productions and women SWOON for him. Virtually every woman I know thinks hes the hottest thing. Oh yeah, Jason Momoa starred in so many female-targeted franchises. Baywatch, Stargate, Conan, Aquaman... oh wait no the target demographic of all those things were primiarly males.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 10:55 PM
1

The majority is really uninterested in abs and in fact not that interested in the body. Looks-wise females are far more interested in faces I feel in practice. In practice they don't consider abs a hindrance but most don't really care either. Apparently this is the ideal male face as perceived by females generated by an AI that induced random variations and asked female respondants which one they liked the most until it arrived at what got the highest score.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 02:52 AM
1

Free contraception is free. If I would be trying to have children I would not be I.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 02:44 AM
1

Yeah, I can explained that quite easily: There is a nonzero number of female humans around who go nuts about abs. Isn't it amazing that your life-long held belief that every single female is a carbon copy of the other with identical tastes is actually wrong and that they all have individual tastes and despite a nonzero number who like abs existing the majority still doesn't care? Did you know the majority of them also does not listen to Bach but that some do... woooowww... they're actually indiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 02:36 AM
0

Well then how come when one of my friends uses his bare chest and abs on Tinder, he gets more matches than when he is bulking during the winter and kinda flabby? Because flabby and abs aren't the only two things in existence? I guess "Girls like long hair" because when my male friend cured male-pattern baldness and grow a luxurious mane it got more matches. Oh wait there are more things than male pattern baldness and a luxurious mane. I tended to do better when I have less fat than more. At no p…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 01:38 AM
1

And do you appreciate romance Nope, "romantic gestures" are rooted in weird gender roles anyway and in practice it's just benevolent sexism. And thankfully no one has ever done anything "romantic" for me that I know of. Do you do romantic things for the man too? Nein.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 12:18 AM
2

No they don't; that's the point. Girls do not care about abs. Ever noticed how there are rarely abs in female-marketed media like romcoms and shit whilst all the male-targeted action hero shit is full of abs. Males are in fact rarely shirtless in female-targeted media and considerably more in male targeted ones. It's a cliché; but it's true
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 11:42 PM
1

Probably because there exists more on the planet than fat and ripped and non-fat/non-ripped males also "fuck women"?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 01:16 PM
6

I cannot believe how many still seem to think that the average female prefers "ripped" despite it like constantly going around everywhere that they don't; it's like they never have been acquainted with at least the contradicting opinion and taking it as fact. Like come on this was already known when Johnny Bravo was still on the air because it was completely based on that; it was a show mocking a male who enthusiastically worked out in the hopes that this was what females desired with almost all…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 11:26 AM
5

There are different things to use muscles for than "to work out" though like actual high-labour jobs. Apart from that the "workout look" is about what you eat; half of it is actually getting muscles but the other half is reducing body fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 11:22 AM
2

I'd like mine to cheat to be honest; takes pressure of my shoulders and improves my sex life if they diversity and pick up some things here and there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 11:36 PM
6

Good: ignore it and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 12:22 PM
2

It's sexist if you only ask one sex; if you ask everyone you're not sexist but just an annoying arsehole. You can be an annoying arsehole without being sexist and all you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 03:16 AM
1

You're asking why people are hypocrite with regards to a specific sex only? Well because that sex is 50% of the species that practically to the man is hypocrite. Human beings who are not hypocrite aren't easy to find.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 08:55 PM
2

"commitment" doesn't mean anything at all; it's a buzzword that is just thrown around but when people ask to define it each and everyone one of them comes with a completely different and often incompatible definition. "commitment" seems to really just be a convoluted way to say "however the fuck I want to be treated personally". You have more luck getting a coherent definition of what "technical" means from Dream Theater fans.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 08:15 AM
1

Maybe—but it seems like every man perceives a smart man who disagrees with the former as "acting smart" and a man who acts smart who agrees with the former as "being smart".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 09:37 PM
1

Meh, same people would not say it if people used the same big words to agree with something. That's how it goes; if you flaunt your intelligence but agree with something then it's like "Ohhh, intelligent thing agrees with me; that means I'm right." but when it disagrees it's like "You're just trying to act smart!"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 09:10 PM
1

Never—fuck "partnerships". No way in hell I'm going to give another any measure of control over my private life to be "partners"; my life is my life; your life is your life; and beyond the time and space they physically intersect others have nothing to say about mine and I nothing of that of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 08:43 PM
1

Depends on the woman in question? It's good for some, bad for others? But hey this is r/ppd where for some reason everything needs to believe in some weird idea that "males are like this; females are like this; individuals don't exist really and there are exactly two kinds of human beings that inhabit this planet with no further individual variance"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 03:28 AM
1

I'm personally one of those maniacs who believes that rape would be considered no worse than any other physical transgression in a perfectly sex-neutral society and the only reason it's considered so bad is because societies put sex on a pedestal. In sex neutral society being raped would be about as bad as having to undergo a prostate examination or even being at the dentist with a dentist rooting around in your mouth: physically uncomfortable? yes—but what makes rape so traumatic is the social …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 03:19 AM
6

50% of the post there are just "disagreed with me and used a big word to do so" to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 01:12 AM
1

I mean the point of this isn't to have a high success rate but a high absolute success number; It's about casting a wide net because it turns out that casting the net is fairly cheap; it's not like you put a lot of effort into this. So success rate is low but if you just try enough times absolute success number will be quite high.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 08:23 AM
6

I think on average yes but only after a certain age anecdotally. Females are often said to be more neotenous than males and apparently it's more than an anecdote I find that after a certain age males become rusted and lose open-mindedness and fluidity and start seeing the world in the more binary and rigid way that adults do rather than the more fluid and organic way a child sees it. Things need to be categorized into rigid categories more so. Before the age of around 22-25 I've noticed now diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 08:16 AM
2

The point is that you don't know before whether it will only last one night eh. If you do know then that was in some way either verbally or implicitly communicated by the parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 08:10 AM
2

Ahahaha, no dude that's the problem with this "approach" stuff; you approach a complete stranger you know nothing about based on the latter's looks alone. I've been in New York—it was absolutely weird how complete strangers just suddenly started to have a talk with you and even waitstaff in restaurants felt it appropriate to share personal experiences with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 06:47 AM
3

Oh please—this "approaching strangers" shtick is a North American cultural idiosyncrasy. In most cultures including mine people by and large have no interest in talking to total strangers they know nothing about and have no history with because it's an empty conversation about the whether.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 06:26 AM
1

Fucking bullshit— On every single female sub ever it's raining with complaints about how they constantly get approached too much and hate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 06:23 AM
8

Yeah here's the thing that a lot of people miss with this whole "expecting to approach"; I don't "expect" anyone to do that in fact literally a post back I said I don't ever want to be "appraoched" at all and then I got called antisocial for that. I'm sure a large part of it is social conditioning yes but another large part is simply being far less interested and far less requiring sex and relationships as a need. A lot of females do approach and those happen to be the ones who have a higher nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 06:21 AM
2

My question ladies both red and blue do you ever want to be approached at the gym? I don't want to be "approached" for social reasons anywhere by strangers—only for business as in if you actually talk to me for a reason rather than make a reason up to talk to me. yes, there is a however small chance that I just happen to actually click with a stranger who knows nothing about me but that chance isn't worth it; there's also a chance that if I dive into the pond right now I find a huge bar of gold …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 06:17 AM
3

Indeed, it turns out that you need a certain level of attractiveness for that. Just as not everyone has the skills to become a programmer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 09:57 PM
2

Well yeah: accepting those which want to have sex with you there and having sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 09:06 PM
2

By being desirable for one night stands by those it desires one night stands with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 09:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter