TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

holyfreakingshitake Archive

View 1 posts and 37 comments by holyfreakingshitake on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

But sometimes that's the smarter decision, like giving up your career to move so your partner can take a much higher paying job. In that situation it's not fair to get left flat on your ass if things go south.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:23 AM
2

An 11 year old is not the one at fault here, it is the state. Coming forward like that rather that just living on comfortably with it like she could have takes some modicum of courage, though the fact that she had no idea whatsoever about the result of him being prosecuted or what his situation was when she recanted surprises me. No one can expect an 11 year old to act with everyone's best interest at hand (especially when she believed she would be taken away from her mother) or fully comprehend…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:45 PM
2

This MRAs and sometimes even this sub have a bad habit of assuming an allegation is false immediately and getting appropriately outraged/pleased from there. Have to give the victim at least some consideration first, rape is a very real problem. At least, regardless of truth, this shows that one government has more on-point punishment severity for something like this, but I hope she is only prosecuted if her claim is demonstrably false, and he if it is demonstrably true. If the italian courts fuc…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:14 PM
2

How you can believe you are right and are doing the right thing while simultaneously faking the evidence to prove your point because you can't actually find any I will never understand.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:27 PM
0

You replied to my point with pathetic rants that had no relevancy just to create the argument. This in addition to now editing more pathetic condescending bullshit into your comments makes me think you have a chip on your shoulder.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:55 PM
0

Yes, keep editing your comments, that's obviously how debate works. In the order the retardation occurs: It was consistently referred to as "Sue Ann Hamm's lawyers" argued for/that ect. and I never saw any mention of her being a lawyer in the article but even if she is that is arbitrary as hell. These are courtroom tactics, no decent lawyer is going to ask for a sum any lower than is permitted by law to be paid, there is simply no advantage to it. This is getting stupid. I don't where the hell y…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:51 PM
1

It's all good, I just think people in this sub need to take a step back sometimes, not get caught up in it. And from the information given on the situation and Oklahoma law it is definitely hard to say whether or not she is deserving of stock, but I would say that just a large amount of cash is probably the a good, safe answer in this scenario and the judge seems to have got it right.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:01 PM
1

Of course lawyers would go for as much as they could as that is usually then used as the maximum for what can be awarded. And she is no longer an executive, she is an ex-wife, looking for her cut of wealth accumulated over a 26 year marriage. In the article it states that Under Oklahoma law, the enhancement of wealth that comes as a result of the efforts, skills or funds of either spouse is subject to "equitable distribution." Over the 26-year marriage, the value of Continental soared some 400-f…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:06 PM
-2

Reading this it's hard to imagine you even read my comment. My original reply to MrAwesomo92 was only pointing out that his multiple assumptions about the competence and intentions of Sue Ann Hamm were completely unfounded. When you replied mentioning the inaccuracies of his comment and talking about possible corporate destabilization resulting from a division of stock all I did was defend that we shouldn't make any assumptions about Sue Ann, specifically the negative ones made by MrAwesomo92. Y…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:31 PM
-5

...I made no reference to the settlement, only that her career as an exucutive is strong evidence that she is an intelligent person and not someone uninvolved with the company only linked via marriage. At what point can this sub stop assuming women are stupid and greedy just for being women?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:30 PM
0

But she was an executive there (the article says "for years"). It is completely unfair to assume that the wife is some useless greedy moron based on the information provided in the article.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:55 PM
18

After a decently long marriage and considering his wife was an executive at the company for a while this guy did pretty well settlement-wise.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:06 PM
13

Key word relatively. It was entirely possible that she might have got company stock as well.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:32 PM
-9

Making statements about the wife as if you know anything about her.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:30 PM
-8

I've heard from people that have been there that most of Australia is extremely sexist and racist. This isn't the worst thing ever, maybe Australia simply needs women fighting for women's rights there...
/r/MensRights22/09/14 03:58 PM
10

"it's all about my uninformed and/or uncaring parents"
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:54 PM
1

this infographic doesn't really show harshness. you could probably find a better one.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:08 PM
10

Did buzzfeed release a... sensible article?
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:04 PM
3

But he didn't threaten her, he called the police even when struck, showing that he obviously had no intention of being violent
/r/PussyPass14/05/14 01:48 AM
6

Not a percieved threat, an actual threat. You cannot hit someone in self defence before they do anything physical that's retarded
/r/PussyPass13/05/14 01:56 PM
7

...why would he be charged with assault when he didn't touch anybody...
/r/PussyPass13/05/14 01:52 PM
-1

They only had receipts for $6000, she stole a lot more
/r/PussyPass13/05/14 01:15 AM
5

but they are actually are correct, whereas the people in /r/iamverysmart are simply trying out their new dictionary.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 02:26 AM
3

Then state it as a possibility and not as if you assume the woman is lying. The problem here is the unnescessary and slanderous release of his personal information, not whether or not a rape was comitted.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:49 PM
4

That doesn't mean you have any right to pass judgement on this case. Rape does happen, and women have every right to report it. Whether or not what she says is true will be decided by the court, not the news and certainly not you.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:02 PM
9

Funny, that isn't what you wrote...
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:13 PM
4

Threatening to take the children away HAHAHHAHHAahahhahaha... never going to happen.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:28 AM
2

And if that was posted here seriously we would downvote the fuck out of it. That is why this sub is 100x more fair and equal than any feminist subreddit I've seen so far.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:34 PM
2

Number 8. If your vagina is none of my business why does your shirt tell everyone about it?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:29 PM
2

Who rapes people in elevators?
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:15 PM
2

You're right, and as I said, they are both criminals.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:24 PM
1

We can't let this sub spiral into an anti-women circlejerk. He threatened her life, shooting him would have been acceptable. They are both criminals, and should both be treated as such.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:09 AM
1

Kinda have mixed feelings about this one, robbing someone at gunpoint is inexcusable...
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:05 AM
1

Why is "nibling" as hilarious as it is. And this amy person seems to have some sense, has she ever made any similar statements?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:55 AM
69

My penis consented to all of my high school presentations, I am a powerpointsexual dont judge me.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 07:41 PM
6

Glad he said it though.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:43 AM
6

They really outright opposed something that would ensure equality? That's just fucking awful. When it gets to this point they really can't act ignorant of all the problems with men, custody, and child support.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter