hon3ytree Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number You keep coMparing things that obviously are not the same 😆	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 03:39 PM
1	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number Wrong again. You’re dense	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 03:24 PM
0	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number I never said that. In fact personally I’ve always dated men regardless of their looks and I’ve always been told I am better looking than the person I was dating. What would be hypocritical would be if I was unattractive but only wanted attractive partners, or if I had a high body count but only wanted partners with a low one 😆 I know you know this but with an IQ of 70 paired with misogyny you’re going to keep defending your dumb ass view.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 02:45 PM
0	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number And you’re trying to justify misogyny and it’s giving IQ of 70 🤡🥴	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 02:26 PM
0	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number I literally already told you. Body count is not similar to height differences between male and female partners. Body count can be likened to someone’s physical attractiveness. It’s hypocritical to be extremely unattractive and to only accept attractive partners. It’s hypocritical to have a high body count and only choose someone with a low body count. Bc you possess the trait you dislike in someone else. Why should that person want you then? This whole conversation is insane lol you’re purposely…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 01:47 PM
1	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number Bc someone’s character could change and they could stop having casual sex. Duh	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 01:44 PM
1	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number “Promiscuity is a choice, height is not. Promiscuity cannot be attributed to solely one gender or another— whereas tall is considered masculine and short or small is more feminine. This is more akin to a butt ugly balding man only preferring beautiful women. ALSO disgusting and annoying and hypocritical.”	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 02:00 AM
1	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number I didn’t say I was having trouble understanding 😾I said it was a weak ass analogy and that it was stupid.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 02:00 AM
1	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number Promiscuity is a choice, height is not. Promiscuity cannot be attributed to solely one gender or another— whereas tall is considered masculine and short or small is more feminine. This is more akin to a butt ugly balding man only preferring beautiful women. ALSO disgusting and annoying and hypocritical	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 01:59 AM
2	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number That is so dumb. You’re literally comparing apples to oranges and it makes no sense.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 01:55 AM
3	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number As long as you’re not a fucking hypocrite like technoronin.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 12:11 AM
3	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number Lmao body count isn’t a personality trait. If he doesn’t like women that have casual sex bc it indicates something unsavory about them, then goes and has casual sex himself, then that means he is ALSO going to have that unsavory aspect. Duhhh. Men who sleep around and have casual sex are the fucking same, character-wise, as women who sleep around and have casual sex. The only thing worse than a man who sleeps around is a man who sleeps around a ton but thinks women shouldn’t! Go back to 1800	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/10/22 12:10 AM
3	Dating a woman who was promiscuous is questionable is based on the type of men she has been with, not necessarily the number Do you never have casual sex? Do you hold yourself to the same standard?	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/10/22 08:06 PM
3	Prime example that having money does not automatically make you a HVM! Beware of ‘godly men’ queens. What the fuqqqq this is so cringe!!!	/r/FemaleDatingStrategy	03/11/21 01:00 PM