TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

honoraryorange Archive

View 0 posts and 117 comments by honoraryorange on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Check out her other videos. She's amazing.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:24 AM
–

I wish people would stop linking his name. All that dumbshit has going for him is his "fame", and he jerks off in his little bedroom to all the attention he gets on Reddit. We just need to let him run off with his feminist friends and live in their happy rainbow land where nobody ever disagrees with them.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:42 AM
1

What, feminists trying to silence opposing views? Who would have thought!
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:08 PM
81

That's enough out of you, Hillary!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 09:18 PM
3

It means without establishing one, yes. They could have said "We're letting you go, goodbye." But by pulling him in and telling him [i]why[/i] (because of what the crazy bitch has done) they've opened themselves up to liability. At will means they can fire you for 'no' reason, not for 'any' reason. There's a difference.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:38 PM
3

That's not what at will means. Stop this stupid shit.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:49 AM
5

Even the Socialist Party is like SRS land, look at their official agenda. Shit is hilarious.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 11:45 PM
9

Always sync to the cloud!
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:51 PM
3

But he has to be right! I mean look how deep and contemplative he is? Looking up at the #bloodmoon, I see Mars and another star, and realize that I live on a rock, hurtling through space. I think that's cool. SO DEEP. Surely he's analyzed this survey and knows it is accurate, right?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:49 PM
–

He's a typical SJW dumbfuck. Which means he's uttery blind and he truly believes this shit is accurate.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:47 PM
4

It is ridiculously unrealistic for that large a percentage to be Strongly Conservative.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:44 PM
–

Watch out for the dickwolves, cunt.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:25 AM
0

/u/unbannable9412 speaks the truth. /r/lgbt is the laughing stock of the community. It is basically just place for feminists to hang out and bitch about oppression like SRS. Source: I'm a big homo and stepped in there once and noped the fuck out.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:37 AM
–

we had about 50 applicants out of 2200 that were female, women just are not interested Of course they aren't. The word is too hard, too long, and too dangerous. There's no societal norms saying they're the ones who should have to put up with all that in order to make a good wage.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:22 PM
–

Welcome to victim-culture.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:13 AM
6

It started as an amusing parody of some of the random shit you see on Reddit (go figure) but then the Tumblr-level Feminists found it and I think the trolls have all been replaced with keyboard warriors.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 07:38 PM
15

Because it didn't fucking happen, you moron.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:01 AM
17

Check your privilege!
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:58 AM
0

Especially when its a Reddit Rage Against the Police Effort. Reddit will upvote anything about how evil police are. (That said, if even half of what this person said was true, all of these officers should be fired. Stepping on fingers? Fired. Snarkily telling people they'll see a doctor while instead bringing them to solitary? Fired - Police need to be above normal standards and fucking with people is not allowed.)
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:43 PM
1

If even half of this is true, all involved officers need to be taken out back dumped in a hole, and buried.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:39 PM
3

Sokay, I had them both tagged already as massive SRS bitches.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:55 PM
–

Basically it is a label they throw on you while telling you not to label them.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:54 PM
–

If a crime isn't worth going to prison over, neither is covering it up.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:13 AM
–

It was an accident - but the boyfriend is still going to jail. If the primary offensive isn't worth going to jail over, no amount of covering it up should be either.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:07 AM
1

I'd like to see a comparison of how much time a male model has to spend at the gym vs a female model. I'd like to say the rates are equal, but something tells me it's definitely not.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 09:45 PM
4

Interns? It should be no surprise that unpaid interns abound in fields that are highly socially desirable, including fashion, media, and the arts Oppression! They're choosing the fields everybody wants, down with patriarchy! The majority of adjunct faculty? You mean there's a ton more female teachers in general? Who knew! I guess a lot of people get into teaching when they graduate from college at a rate 50% higher than their male counterparts with unemployable degrees. Care workers? The article…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:03 PM
42

If you want to make it extra fun - give huge prizes to the top 10 :) Legbeards' heads would explode.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:10 PM
28

The point being that every single one of these things is something that SRSers/tumblr folk have whined about being part of patriarchy or male privilege. Paying for a woman's dinner is both expected and degrading, as is opening a door for her. Male power fantasies (hence all the talk of hard dicks in the satire). It is all much more amusing if you've read a lot of the feminist bullshit here and elsewhere.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:30 PM
30

"Don't tell him unless you want child support" Equality!
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:09 AM
29

Let's not forget: Criticizing Miley Cyrus for acting like a giant slut = Slutshaming her Meanwhile Giving Miley Cyrus attention and talking about how sexy she is as she wears almost nothing and makes out with hammers = objectification. Why are these particular feminists so fucking retarded?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:48 PM
15

I think a lot of it relates to Reddit's #1 dating rule: Be attractive. You aren't objectifying that woman who got all dressed up in a micro mini skirt with tons of makeup if you're a hot as all fuck dude, you're only objectifying her if you're not up to her standards.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:31 PM
3

There's ways you can do it right, and ways you can do it wrong for sure. I work for a rather large worldwide corporation and our LGBT resources have basically ended up like /r/lgbt here (which, if you're unfamiliar with it, means its been turned into a feminist controlled, overly politically correct pile of shit). But that said, I'm not sure MRM and LGBT rights are related any more than any other group with issues. If anything I say we should throw our weight behind LGBT just as people, rather t…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:12 AM
1

You must never have worked a demanding salary job. Unfortunately that's not how things work (and I'm not saying that's right, that's just how it is). If everybody else is working 60 hours a week during crunch time and you choose not to because a 'work week' is only 40 hours because you have a family, a dog, or like video games, you can count on getting 'downsized'.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:08 AM
8

Skeptical as well - the only part I believe is that he was claiming he couldn't put in as many hours as everyone else because of the family. Well, that's not the school's fault. Your family doesn't mean you get to work less than everyone else, some jobs have busy times and some have less busy times and if you can't put in the time during the busy times, too bad. Welcome to being salaried and it happens everywhere.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:23 AM
-1

Oh shut up. There's nothing offensive about calling for a blunt reminder of genocide to be delivered to a Professor... calling for genocide.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:53 AM
1

Did you read it? I don't have my Kindle here so I can't check it out from the free Prime library. If you did read it, and it does indeed seem quasi-serious, please let me know. There are ways :)
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:09 PM
2

They earn less than men because they work less than men - usually because they would never imagine letting their husband stay home with the children. Women will never earn as much as men if they remain the go-to primary caregiver. It is a burden the family has to share and is not an income equality when looked at as a single unit. (And single women are starting to make MORE than men.)
/r/MensRights07/11/13 07:36 PM
6

Back to SRS with you :)
/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:23 AM
7

I probably would have just chosen something else to go there entirely. All of the previous examples are fairly concrete ideas/singular concepts, the last one is completely generic. Heck the one before it is terrible as well - the advertising industry is pretty bad towards male self esteem, too but that's something feminists generally refuse to acknowledge.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:41 AM
169

Until you get to the last one which feels like it goes back to the 'Men holding back women are the reason men have problems' schism.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:39 PM
1

Well there's two easy ways to stop having to pay her money...
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:24 AM
4

I started realizing it when I was applying for colleges and scholarships in high school. The majority of my friends were women and they were accepted places with lower scores and all of them who put in the work found multiple female only scholarships, even low end ones could add up quick. I was what feminists hate - a middle class white male whose parents hadn't saved up a damn dime yet made enough money to make me ineligible for anything need based. All I had was a little help from academic sco…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:59 AM
5

I agree, or child support needs to be itemized and then paid for by custody arrangement percentages. Oh I get 'weekends'? Great, I pay 20% of his expenses. You can't afford the other 80%? I guess we better swap custody percents then.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:02 AM
16

Oh dear lord, now patriarchy is the reason why men's feelings are ignored lol
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:43 AM
4

If you look at Masters graduates, you could say that there are almost 50% more women graduating than men. People have a hard time believing that number when you quote it.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:34 AM
1

Right, but convicting a woman of that in this case will never happen. They had to charge her with something they have a chance of winning. At least this way even when she gets out early I think she'll have to register as a sex offender.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:43 PM
2

That's not the point of it though - it all leads back to the fact that men dominate dangerous jobs. Yet women want equality in safe high pay jobs, not those ones. It all needs to even out.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:17 PM
1

She didn't - but what she said caused it. Sounds like he freaked out about the thought of the guy going after him or his little brother, causing him to go after Zimmerman. She's basically the reason he died.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:25 PM
–

No, it isn't.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:05 PM
–

Are you seriously comparing a very respectful statement to a call to shoot people? That's moronic.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:04 PM
2

It is more common than you think. I've worked for some huge companies, and one guy had a small byline in his email signature that basically was a very well worded 'You should get checked regular, it saved my life and could save yours'. I heard multiple conversations about how that was 'weird', yet not one person would bat an eyelash about a similar breast cancer one.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:31 PM
5

Exactly! "Strong legal grounding" means protecting the woman, because that's what the laws do. Just once I'd like to see a guy regret sex the next day and and try to make a rape charge that he was coerced into it because he was drunk.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:00 AM
7

That's not entirely correct. Since OP found this, OP is the one harassed. They must detail their findings, actions, and corrections to him completely in order to avoid a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:18 AM
-9

Yes, one week out of every month. Words are hard for you, I know.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:34 PM
3

Victim Culture.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:11 PM
1

Not according to some trans folks - you are not allowed to define their gender! (Meanwhile they'll put their own label on you and call you a cis-male, referencing the fact that you are male and were born male) This definitely isn't all trans people - just a small vocal minority, very similar (and often related) to the problem with the crazy feminist minority who tries to speak for all of them.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 08:39 PM
–

Probably a reference to the recent happenings of the trans community having a major fucking freak out over a Penny Arcade author saying that a woman is defined by having a vagina.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:53 PM
4

You dirty rapist!
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:48 PM
6

Dude looking at the other comments you have made in this thread, you are not willing to help yourself in the slightest. I'm not sure, then, what you expect to get out of this rant.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:49 PM
4

I agree with you on those two points - they are not gender reversals but in fact direct changes to make it worse. If this graphic gets updated to have those make more sense it would be awesome.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 08:19 PM
1

You can still take it to the school and demand they take action for creating a hostile environment for your son and other boys.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:40 PM
9

Wow, do you have a link to the entire case file? Is it publicly available?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:20 PM
10

Where is the information about the Woman of the Year award? that isn't in the PDF.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 10:03 PM
39

He did - he won, he got nothing.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 09:40 PM
4

Like many others, I also reported this page and received cookie cutter response that they aren't doing jack shit. We need to get EVERYONE reporting this page.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:35 PM
0

54% are unreported.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:26 PM
2

Yes, it is a lie. According to the Department of Justice about 54% of rapes go unreported, so even th en we're looking at 1 in ~850 or so... so close to 1 in 4!
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:28 PM
1

If you had been my kid, the principal would have had broken limbs.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:21 PM
15

Depends on the location. In Washington state it is a misdemeanor, max 1 year $1000. In Toronto it would be max of 2 years.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:30 PM
6

When your hoohoodilly is put into someone's chacha without your consent. (I guess it'd work for any orifice actually)
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:32 PM
3

Post secondary education stats. Most people are pretty surprised when confronted with the fact that this year (not next year, not next decade) women will graduate with a master's degree at a 50% higher rate than men will. And yet they're still being told they're not equally represented? Some info here: http://www.contemporaryfamilies.org/Gender-Sexuality/why-dont-men-finish-college-as-often-as-women-press-release.html 2013 Statistics (and estimated 2022): http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/05/no-comm…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:58 AM
3

That's a nice example. However statistics are not in your favor. It does not go 'either way' it goes against the father the majority of the time regardless of circumstances.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:55 AM
9

How not to be creepy as a man: Step 1: Don't be unattractive Step 2: Be attractive
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:54 PM
23

We also need more women in the 10 deadliest occupations, but I don't see anyone fighting for equality there.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:38 AM
0

Right, but the idiot above me is talking about 'proper' dosing for growing muscles, and how it can't possibly be harmful.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:23 AM
-2

Did you really just try to tell us that steroids can't possibly be harmful unless they're mislabeled or not dosed properly? LOL.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:45 PM
3

You may be surprised. People can have empathy for things they haven't experienced. Also there's people out there who have not experienced them first hand, but grew up around it. My dad did 1st Recon shit in the gulf war, Somalia, and a few other places - so trust me, I don't have first hand experience but myself and others like me still understand. Don't be afraid to talk to us, and don't think we don't get it. Trust me, we do :)
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:26 PM
0

What the fuck is up with the downvotes there? Did the slutty women find your post?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:43 AM
3

Good point, and looking at his history he has a huge problem with 'fags' and 'bitches'. I think he's just an angry little man.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:59 PM
4

Reading is hard for you, huh?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:55 PM
5

And you're a fucking moron. Want to use beets as an example? At least try to make it real. Some people get touched by beats. Some get touched by potatoes. They both feel pretty much the same when they touch you. Some people say beets are a little more soothing or that potatoes work out the muscles a little better. Those are personal preferences and make plenty of sense. Some people see that a beet might touch them and run away screaming, because they're irrationally fearful of a beet which would…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:52 PM
4

Please follow through on your comment.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:50 PM
1

You mean bigot bashing, you homophobic dumbfuck.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:32 PM
5

Another well thought out answer, thanks! I love all the crazy bigots in this thread HOW DARE YOU QUESTION WHY IM SCARED OF A MAN
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:30 PM
1

That is a perfectly acceptable and very well thought out answer and pretty much exactly what I was looking for :) Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:29 PM
2

Cupcake? Really? Dumbass.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:29 PM
3

OMG some little homophobe on the internet called me a bitch. My feelings are hurt :(
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:28 PM
3

Answer a simple question then: Why do you prefer a woman?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:45 PM
8

While you certainly can choose who you get a massage from, your reaction is pretty much the definition of homophobia. Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:44 PM
2

Not saying any death should be encouraged. But there are some professions with higher accident rates than others, and ones that cause more wear and tear on the bodies. These are hugely dominated by men. As are some other professions - like STEM professions. My main point it is unfair to push your way into one in the name of equality while completely ignoring the rest.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:32 PM
6

Part of the issue is they want equality, but only where they want it. They want equal pay, yet work far less hours. They want equal jobs - but only in the SAFE and high paying jobs (You'll never see them asking to be equal in the top 10 deadliest career fields). When they start fighting for equality across ALL jobs and actually working towards it instead of the ones that purely benefit them (like the high paying safe jobs), then we can talk.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:38 PM
10

Great, so why don't they hold Women of Garbage Collection conventions? Or maybe Women of Grusome Workplace Deaths? You know, so we can get some actual equality in the workplace.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:37 PM
13

ASSHOLES ARE SO MALE CENTRIC GOSH
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:29 AM
25

What a hypocritical little bitch she is.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:33 AM
1

This was brought up previously and recently wasn't it? They responded saying they would look into it and seemed very sympathetic to it all. I'd suggest checking their forums and posting there, it seemed to get a good response last time. (Symantec, that is)
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:51 AM
22

Are you sure she was ever even pregnant? And yeah as the others have said, lawyer up, make sure she follows through. She manipulated you so all bets are off - stick around until you're sure it is gone, then get the fuck out of dodge.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:33 AM
1

To record a phone conversation, not one in person. Also, the following covers notification: *An audible beep tone repeated at regular intervals during the course of the call.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:35 PM
5

Don't you know they all work AND spend 8 hours a day cleaning up after those slovenly males. That means 16 hours a day.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:47 PM
2

Plus a $400 phone is felony (grand theft) in many states. Which really opens up your options for getting your property back.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:48 AM
3

How do you think convictions happen? They do find evidence, or at least enough to meet the legal definition.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:25 AM
8

Strawman. Stop asking what if. Evidence: Yes/No (circle one) Just like every other crime.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:11 AM
74

How about the dude is innocent until some proof shows up?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:13 AM
3

This is not true, 'de rigeur', nor standard for anybody in the video game industry except the most paranoid perhaps.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 09:36 PM
-1

LOL.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 09:35 PM
2

They're already working on fixing it, very nice response on their forums.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:48 AM
0

Your mother is a fucking cunt. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:25 AM
0

Yep just search the name and it comes up. Report it.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:46 PM
1

The problem would be if they told a woman she needed her husband's permission, they'd be sued faster than you could blink.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:26 AM
-9

To be fair teenage boys get away with a LOT of minor things and even harassment with 'boys will be boys', but on the flip side we have the above where it is 100% absolutely guilty until proven innocent in some cases.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:17 AM
4

Adblock doesn't stop pageviews from going up, which still makes them money when they sell to other advertisers.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:45 PM
3

He wouldn't be in trouble. You have the right to defend yourself from situations like this, using any force necessary, depending on where you're at. This is the very definition of false imprisonment and arguably kidnapping as well. (I should add, he shouldn't be in trouble if he defended himself, it is within his rights. That said, sexism goes a long ways, and he might have gotten fucked by the courts/police if he had.)
/r/MensRights10/11/12 08:53 PM
11

To be fair, it has no place in school either.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:33 AM
2

No, legally in the UK if you are over 18 you cannot have sex with someone under 18 if you are in a position of trust over them. EDIT - Ahh I see this was Scotland, yeah it doesn't reply. Others had been mentioning England repeatedly and I didn't go doublecheck.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:06 AM
1

There's also legal responsibility in England because she was over 18 and in a position of trust over him. She should have been prosecuted. EDIT - Ahh I see this was Scotland, yeah it doesn't reply. Others had been mentioning England repeatedly and I didn't go doublecheck.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:05 AM
2

Maybe you should do some research: England and Wales The age of consent in England and Wales is 16[63] regardless of sexual orientation and/or gender, as specified by the Sexual Offences Act 2003.[64] However, if person A is over the age of 18 and is in a position of trust to person B who is under the age of 18, it is illegal for A to engage in sexual activity with B.[65] EDIT - Ahh I see this was Scotland, yeah it doesn't reply. Others had been mentioning England repeatedly and I didn't go doub…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:04 AM
–

Has this man touched you inappropriately Fido? Has he touched you in your nono place?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:17 AM
3

Shit, you have better patience than me. I'd have just gotten him and left and told them to fuck off. And yeah as the others said, it is time to lawyer up :(
/r/MensRights25/08/12 05:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter