| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Deployed soldier's wife gives away baby after birth, lies to husband saying it diedI mean, we don't know that. She might just be ashamed that it happened and wants to get rid of the reminder. Seems possible. Not trying to justify her actions by any means but we don't know the full story. No matter the reason, she's in the wrong but depending on the context, it could be more understandable. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/18 02:24 AM |
| -4 | Deployed soldier's wife gives away baby after birth, lies to husband saying it diedI doubt this is the case given the circumstances but rape is a possibility too. Getting super fucked up at a party can lead to things you didn't consent to | /r/MensRights | 21/05/18 04:53 AM |
| 10 | An honest wish of a DadWhich of those parts were about female coding? | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 03:06 AM |
| 3 | An honest wish of a DadThat's probably true though, it's Ohio | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 03:05 AM |
| 1 | Judge Judy Not Having ItAnd yet you did until called out | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/05/17 09:34 PM |
| 0 | Judge Judy Not Having ItBecause it's funny. You run from a conversation when called out lmao | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/05/17 09:09 PM |
| 1 | Judge Judy Not Having ItBut at least it's clean | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/05/17 08:56 PM |
| 2 | Jesus, when my paycheck is $2700 and $2676 goes to my ex, there is something seriously fucking wrongHe put it in quotes because he means sexual pleasure. He just means "why date someone when I can jack off" Going through his history, he is into hentai, animals, and was a virgin a month ago. If that's what you're into, fine but he's seeing women as objects for his pleasure that can be replaced by his hand. That's not all that serious relationships have to offer nor should be treated as. Sex aside, there's a lot more happiness to gain when you can spend time with someone on a deeper level than j… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/16 04:05 PM |
| 1 | Jesus, when my paycheck is $2700 and $2676 goes to my ex, there is something seriously fucking wrongThe only "benefits" you see from dating someone is "pleasure" and their income You sound like the parasite here | /r/MensRights | 30/10/16 03:11 AM |
| 1 | Jesus, when my paycheck is $2700 and $2676 goes to my ex, there is something seriously fucking wrongI'm a nice guy, funny | /r/MensRights | 30/10/16 03:07 AM |
| 0 | Jesus, when my paycheck is $2700 and $2676 goes to my ex, there is something seriously fucking wrongDon't marry or prenup if you do. Don't pretend that you're lonely by choice | /r/MensRights | 30/10/16 03:01 AM |
| 5 | For school I had to create a poster on a cause we're passionate about. I did mine on domestic violence against men.Much better :) | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 05:56 AM |
| 11 | For school I had to create a poster on a cause we're passionate about. I did mine on domestic violence against men."or equal to" on both ends | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 05:53 AM |
| 2 | White Straight Male PrivilegeNo need to argue with me. I'm not making any statements about anything. I was just reiterating what someone else said since /u/willmaster123 purposefully ignored it | /r/MensRights | 11/07/16 01:35 AM |
| 17 | White Straight Male PrivilegeI think you purposefully chose not to understand what he said He never said being white in general makes him more oppressed or anything. He said that the left, specifically the left, tends to want to harm him/reduce my civil liberties/deny him education and social benefits because he is white He never said he has it worse than anyone. He never said other people don't face this. Nothing like that. You are arguing to argue. You don't have a point. You just want to argue | /r/MensRights | 10/07/16 11:09 PM |
| 2 | Woman convicted of molesting a five year old boy, won't spend a single day in jailThe article clearly stated how long it was suspended. 3-8 years | /r/MensRights | 29/06/16 05:18 AM |
| 3 | Woman convicted of molesting a five year old boy, won't spend a single day in jailMake one. Whining about other peoples' inaction isn't action | /r/MensRights | 29/06/16 05:17 AM |
| 1 | /r/PersonalFinance deletes post and shuts thread because user dared to ask for help regarding his female replacement being paid vastly more salary (likely illegally) than him for the exact same position and workThey only show as [deleted] if they had replies. Comments at the bottom of a tree do not show [deleted]. In the case of a tree comprised of 1 comment AKA no replies, you'll never know it was there. This was likely the majority of the removed comments. They're often one time comments that aren't a part of a chain and are removed before there are any replies. Sometimes you see a comment, it says "load more comments (1 reply)", nut when you click to load more, nothing appears. That's because the re… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/16 09:52 PM |
| -1 | Teenage girl posts photo on Facebook of a man she thought was filming her. Turns out the man is innocent, has special needs and is half blind, and his family now fears for his safety after backlash.Oops. I thought it said they were "arranged", not "Let's arrange". I'm sleepy | /r/MensRights | 17/06/16 08:30 PM |
| -6 | Teenage girl posts photo on Facebook of a man she thought was filming her. Turns out the man is innocent, has special needs and is half blind, and his family now fears for his safety after backlash.You already put "not ok" in there | /r/MensRights | 17/06/16 08:23 PM |
| 5 | Girls, 13, lied about park sex attack, say Greater Manchester policeIt wasn't a false rape charge That said, I don't see how this was even a sexual assault. According to the story, he just "approached her from behind before hitting her and throwing her to the floor." I know it was a false story but I don't see the sexual part. That said, there was never any mention of rape charges or anything so don't make this about something it's not. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/16 09:38 PM |
| -1 | A man walks into The Women's Center...So he's off topic and irrelevant. Got it | /r/MensRights | 19/12/15 04:58 AM |
| 24 | Male University of York Student Commits Suicide on Day His University Ditches International Men's Day After Pressure From FeministsAnd they forfeit their degree/credits up to that point. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/15 06:43 PM |
| 5 | University branded “disgusting” and “shameful” over decision to cancel Men’s Day celebration row #InternationalMensDaySo she didn't say it and yet you're quoting her. False quotes are exactly what we need here /s | /r/MensRights | 18/11/15 03:50 AM |
| 0 | How not to report on child sexual abuse: An 11-year-old boy does not “have sex with” his adult babysitterSo you didn't read the article OP posted? Because that article said that... | /r/MensRights | 09/10/15 02:30 AM |
| 1 | Day One of wearing my #MENINIST sweatshirt at high schoolYou can't delete other peoples' comments on Yik Yak btw. They may have been reported enough to get automatically removed though. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/15 06:06 AM |
| -1 | One of the most complete & comprehensive criticisms of feminism I've ever seen (x-post r/TumblrAtRest)I don't care about karma whatsoever, it's just showing the kind of attitude you are portraying. You will never convince anyone if you approach it that way. You need to facilitate discussion, not YOU ARE THE ENEMY DOWNVOTE BECAUSE I DISAGREE | /r/MensRights | 28/09/14 03:47 AM |
| -2 | One of the most complete & comprehensive criticisms of feminism I've ever seen (x-post r/TumblrAtRest)Which is an attacking title setting people up to be on the defensive instead of ready to think. The original article title is shitty too. But you're the kind to downvote when I'm actually explaining something to you because you got defensive. That's my exact point. You are acting just as they would. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/14 05:40 PM |
| -3 | One of the most complete & comprehensive criticisms of feminism I've ever seen (x-post r/TumblrAtRest)Because you posted likely blog spam with an attacking title. Your post was shitty. They can't sift thru everything to check if it's spam or not. Not saying they were right (especially not with the ban), but you made a crap effort to facilitate discussion. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/14 09:40 AM |
| 0 | Hilarious, feminists latest #hashtag got hijacked by women campaigning against male circumcisionSo are vaccinations. If you get a shot in your butt, it isn't rape, promise. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/14 01:10 AM |
| 1 | Hilarious, feminists latest #hashtag got hijacked by women campaigning against male circumcisionAnd people can be wrong. You weren't raped by your parents because they changed your diaper. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 11:22 PM |
| 1 | Hilarious, feminists latest #hashtag got hijacked by women campaigning against male circumcisionSo the doctor pulling you out during birth is touching your naked body without your consent. Is that sexual assault? Your parents changing your diaper without your consent. Is that sexual assault? | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 08:17 PM |
| -1 | Hilarious, feminists latest #hashtag got hijacked by women campaigning against male circumcisionI'm not saying it's right, it's just that legally, you have no basis for your claim whatsoever. Also again, it wasn't sexual in the slightest. But you didn't want to talk about being wrong on that part, huh? | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 09:38 AM |
| 3 | Hilarious, feminists latest #hashtag got hijacked by women campaigning against male circumcisionOr how about we behave appropriately and not be jack asses to fight jack asses? | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 09:28 AM |
| -1 | Hilarious, feminists latest #hashtag got hijacked by women campaigning against male circumcisionNo, that's maybe sexual assault but the point is that currently, your parents gave consent and it wasn't sex so neither main factors of rape happened. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 09:27 AM |
| 6 | Lulu: The Most Sexist App Ever CreatedDid you read the article? There was one (a few actually) but Apple removed them from the appstore since they were "hate" oriented. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/14 10:18 PM |
| -3 | Denmark may soon be the first country in the world to issue a ban on non-therapeutic circumcisionKeep this in /r/braveryjerk. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/14 07:44 PM |
| 16 | Male circumcision is a human rights violation that must be stopped say European leaders….Yea, in American culture, uncircumcised penises are "weird". I'm against circumcision but when I was younger, I found it weird that my friend wasn't. Then I grew up and realized what a shitty thing it is. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/13 02:19 PM |
| 2 | Its been almost a year since I've seen my son. Got to take him trick or treating tonightWell, since he is celebrating here, it's likely a case of him (at least believing) being wrong. If it was him sobering up, he likely wouldn't have posted it here since that wouldn't make any sense and he would know it was his fault. Once again, not saying he was wronged, just at least believes he was. Could be or couldn't be. That's what we don't know. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/13 01:56 PM |
| 6 | When feminists say "Misandry doesn't exist"Citations please. I don't doubt you but I don't believe it either without a source. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/13 04:32 AM |
| 1 | My best friends mom posted this. Faith slightly restored.I have a few of my friends' moms on facebook. They're just like any other adult. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/13 05:15 PM |
| 2 | TV Star Jon Cryer Must Pay Child Support for Son in His Custody, due to ex-wife not having any other income.Not giving it up =/= making up transactions. Yes, I understand why they would WANT there to be a transaction but that doesn't justify it legally. It literally serves no purpose. It'd be better off if my mom were to just pay them the amount directly. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/13 10:56 PM |
| 8 | TV Star Jon Cryer Must Pay Child Support for Son in His Custody, due to ex-wife not having any other income.I've posted this comment before so I'll just copy paste it: I lived with my mom for 14 years. I don't know if she asked for it, he offered, or he was forced but my dad paid child support. Fast-forward 14 years and I live with my dad for various reasons. I am in his custody both physically and legally. They still made him pay child support for me to her. That was a slip-up because they are shitty at their jobs and assumed I was in her care, not his. Once that got straightened out, they started ma… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/13 02:16 PM |
| 1 | After her marriage ended, mom disappears for 11 years because she didn't want to pay for her kids. Why doesn't she have to pay back child support?Holy shit these comments are awful. Just saying "because vagina" isn't helping anything. Sure, it answers the question but it's in such a poor way. Actually explain your reasoning instead of resorting to one-wor answers. You should also read the articles first. The father DID NOT want child support, vagina or not. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/13 11:19 AM |
| 3 | After her marriage ended, mom disappears for 11 years because she didn't want to pay for her kids. Why doesn't she have to pay back child support?Actually, yes they can. Maybe not by the books but unless you are in a position to fight it, they can. Story: I lived with my mom for 14 years. I don't know if she asked for it, he offered, or he was forced but my dad paid child support. Fast-forward 14 years and I live with my dad for various reasons. I am in his custody both physically and legally. They still made him pay child support for me to her. That was a slip-up because they are shitty at their jobs and assumed I was in her care, not hi… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/13 11:16 AM |
| 4 | A friend of mine (female) posted this on facebook, progress =DIt's dumb without sources. Coming from either side. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/13 02:44 PM |
| 3 | [r/worldnews] Canadian father 'appalled' that mother who drowned two young boys and left their dead bodies for her husband to find next to her wedding ring will be released after serving only 10 monthHockey. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 06:19 PM |
| 2 | Warning: /r/feminisms has launched TROLL ATTACK against usIPs change all the time. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 09:05 PM |
| 16 | Warning: /r/feminisms has launched TROLL ATTACK against usYea, his name is Adam and he moderates /r/tldr. I'm not giving out personal info since he doesn't hide it. It's like how everyone knows /u/NotAMethAddict is Kyle. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 09:04 PM |
| 8 | Well put.Yet that's kind of the problem. If my mom weren't she could have kept it. He can't afford a lawyer (along with other legal costs + taking time off work) if he had to pursue it. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/13 07:48 PM |
| 24 | Well put.Sadly the system is set up in a shitty fashion. My dad took custody of me a few years ago before I turned 18. They still took child support form him and gave it to my mom when he had custody and I lived with him. It wasn't enough to warrant suing the state and my mom gave the money back anyway, it was just dumb. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/13 05:00 PM |
| 5 | Equality at its finest.But then you have to look at how it's actually enforced. It's one thing for the laws to exist, another to carry them out equally. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/13 07:10 PM |
| -1 | ..Seriously?I don't have a source so I could be wrong but I've read before that most domestic abuse situations are started by women. As in the woman hits first, not just starts the argument. If that's true, then it is more likely. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/13 04:58 AM |
| 2 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconNo one said that they were... You're arguing something that isn't even related or mentioned. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 09:10 PM |
| 1 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconYes, I agree with this. It does happen far too often. I was just discrediting the first guy's statement that implied all women (people in general but he was referring to women) who marry someone who makes more is just in it for the money. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 07:46 PM |
| 3 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconYou can marry someone then have a kid. It could be the husband's family member, not necessarily the child (dying relative or disabled in general). I never said ANYTHING about "Marrying up to to help take care of your disabled child counts as gold digging." | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 07:33 PM |
| 8 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconExcept you aren't supposed to look at marriage as "how cheap and stingy can I be?". Yes, hiring someone to take the place of your wife is cheaper. Does this fact make your wife a gold digger? No. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 07:31 PM |
| 5 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconNo, they don't have to but unless they want to get a babysitter and stuff, they do for a while until the kids are old enough (assuming they don't space them out). Being dependent doesn't make you a gold digger. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 07:30 PM |
| 5 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconWell just because they marry someone who makes more, even a lot more, doesn't mean they look at it as marrying up. /u/Crimson_D82 is implying they are. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 07:28 PM |
| 6 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconThere's tons of examples. Maybe she handles all of the housework, finances, etc. Hell, they could have a disabled family member with them and be taking care of them. There's plenty of perfectly fine scenraios which don't make them gold-diggers. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 05:28 PM |
| 9 | "The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to 'marry up' now than did so in the 1940s" according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of EconOr they're stay at home moms or have some other large responsibility. You don't have to assume they're all (or even mostly) trashy gold diggers. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 02:16 PM |
| 25 | Man pokes holes in condom, man is charged with sexual assault; woman does effectively the same (takes sperm from used condom), man pays child supporthttp://www.lasisblog.com/2011/02/26/man-receives-oral-sex-ordered-to-pay-child-support/ This is the original. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/13 08:31 AM |
| 1 | Something I find kind of amusing in the gaming community.But that's not what it is directly referring to. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/12 02:50 AM |
| 2 | This kind of Facebook spam photos really get on my nerves. Kudos to the guy, though. [x-post from r/pics]I don't get why it's here either but with the pain thing (kidney stone and child birth), you can measure pain so you can compare. And never did it mention losing someone. It said seeing the one you love be with someone else. If he loves a movie star and she's with someone else, it's the same. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/12 08:49 PM |
| 10 | This kind of Facebook spam photos really get on my nerves. Kudos to the guy, though. [x-post from r/pics]Pointing out that guys have hardships to isn't having a pity party. He didn't bring it up out of nowhere like her, he just retorted. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/12 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Taboo's definition of 'sexist'No, he was saying that there was no challenge in not using their words. The game is very easy. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/12 04:35 AM |
| 1 | Taboo's definition of 'sexist'And he didn't... | /r/MensRights | 20/08/12 04:29 AM |
| 1 | Why is it illegal for the government to tell how a couple should raise their kids, but it suddenly becomes legal once the couple splits?Okay. That makes sense. I just don't understand why it's legal when my dad has enough to support me. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 01:10 AM |
| 1 | Why is it illegal for the government to tell how a couple should raise their kids, but it suddenly becomes legal once the couple splits?Could you explain, please? I'm not sure how they would benefit from this. I don't know economic stuff, that's my brother's field. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/12 11:34 PM |
| 1 | Why is it illegal for the government to tell how a couple should raise their kids, but it suddenly becomes legal once the couple splits?I've heard of those situations as well. It may have just been a bad judge, lawyer, something else. I'm not sure on all of the details. This is in Michigan by the way. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/12 11:33 PM |
| 4 | Why is it illegal for the government to tell how a couple should raise their kids, but it suddenly becomes legal once the couple splits?Actually it's not. My dad has custody of me now (mom was poor and couldn't raising me so I moved in with my dad). They're still on good terms and all and my dad knows she's poor so he said she didn't need to pay any. The court wouldn't listen and made her pay some minimal amount. I'm not sure of the amount but they said that she at least had to pay some. Didn't make sense to any of us. My dad said flat out, "No, I don't need money from her. I do not want money from her. Don't give me money from … | /r/MensRights | 01/08/12 04:44 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter