TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

howdy_im_jon Archive

View 0 posts and 308 comments by howdy_im_jon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The reactions from most sensible people would be the same, they'd laugh. The reactions from Feminists and other gender-warriors would be similar to the reactions in this thread - lots of butthurt comments from people only capable of feeling hate.
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 05:26 PM
-2

Yeah? Do you like the part where he let a child die over something that almost never happens? edit - Can't reply. Mods banned me for trolling. Meanwhile they're hunky-dory keeping people around who willingly let children die. Nice priorities, mods :P
/r/MensRights03/12/19 06:09 PM
-6

This reads like some MGTOW fantasy porn. In the off-chance that it is real - Congratulations, you let a girl die because of the miniscule chance someone might say you touched her inappropriately.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:38 PM
-3

lol.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:58 PM
3

I decided to call him a retard, because him actually believing that nonsense and worse, trying to spread it, makes him retarded. It really doesn't go any deeper than that :) edit - Also, liberals are retarded. And it's deep-seated, not deep-seethed. Retard.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:36 AM
5

Not necessarily. It's possible he just came across a shitty source that came from there or a like-minded site. Doesn't make him a nazi, just a fucking retard. edit - It should be noted that despite being active within the last few hours, he still hasn't provided a source for his statistics. I have no doubt that immigrants are doing most of the raping over there, I'm just not dumb enough to think it's actually 100%. I'm honestly laughing at how brain-dead someone would have to be to think that st…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:11 AM
2

Where are you seeing 100%? Probably on Stormfront.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:01 PM
2

The Tweet you've linked to was not made by a Feminist, and in context it's clear that they're sarcastically falsely accusing a Feminist of saying 'all men are rapists'.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:15 AM
3

Damn, someone raped that poor woman? Hope they catch the perpetrator!
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:27 PM
-2

Nice.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:48 AM
-20

Man, that poor student. Can you imagine getting sucked off by your teacher in class like that? Poor guy was so traumatized he kept going back for more :( Also - Nice.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 08:57 PM
1

He's talking about the Twitter search function, not Google.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 08:52 PM
0

Might want to mark it NSFW, retard. Also, are you really taking that title seriously? It's most likely fantasy to titillate the weirdos on that sub. edit - Thanks for marking it NSFW.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 08:43 PM
6

Uh, that sun-damaged skin clearly does not belong to a young woman.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:29 PM
2

Nice.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 06:45 PM
0

lol. Both of those accounts are 1 day old. I'm sure they're not trolls or anything.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:21 AM
-20

She didn't actually call you stupid. The person who photoshopped the image wanted you to think she did. But seriously, if you got baited by that image, you are kind of stupid.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:13 PM
2

Anyone who thinks she actually said that has an extra chromosome.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:02 AM
2

Dude, they killed off John Connor and replaced him with some chick. If that's not oppression, then I don't know what is!
/r/MensRights19/11/19 03:28 PM
1

I think most normal people feel the same way about those who watch anime regardless of gender. Which makes sense, as weebs are generally pretty detestable.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:57 PM
125

Woman starts an altercation with strangers and her male friends are forced to defend her and deal with the consequences. A tale as old as time.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:43 AM
2

Do we really need to see another made-up story from AITA?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:45 PM
5

Guys, not everything posted on social media is super serious. Jokes are still a thing.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 10:08 PM
-1

It's scary that people actually think this is real 😂
/r/MensRights10/11/19 10:26 PM
3

lol. Nice bait.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 01:25 PM
-5

It's generally a good idea to be dismissive about a 4chan operation from 2014. You know, "don't feed the trolls" and all that.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:08 PM
-9

Yes, people getting baited by trolls on the Internet. It does sum it up, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights07/11/19 04:29 PM
17

It's a new account and it's full of nonsense like this. Most likely a troll.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 04:24 PM
1

Rapist? Nah. Just someone who falls for old Internet hoaxes.
/r/MGTOW06/11/19 06:17 PM
3

lol, there's some decent memes in there. Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights03/11/19 05:49 PM
2

Why not both?
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:21 AM
3

This is years old and it's a post from a known troll/shitposter.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:48 PM
-9

Wow, someone's trolling AITA again. Better make a thread about it!
/r/MensRights01/11/19 07:42 PM
5

lol, you actually think Tom Cruise has sex with women?
/r/MensRights01/11/19 02:27 PM
1

Well, they probably didn't have a clue, but then someone went and made a very public thread bragging about what went on. Anyway, it's all moot now since their account is back up.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:08 AM
2

Well, for better or worse, you've now got an extra 2+ million people side-eyeing this sub. Can't say it was the smartest move, but it'll sure be interesting to see how it plays out.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:19 PM
0

By "men who decide to remain single", are you referring to MGTOWers? If that's the case, it's not so much that they decide to remain single, it's that a lot of them claim to 'go their own way', but spend their day bitching about women on the Internet.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 01:42 PM
7

Jesus Christ, why is everyone paying so much attention to these trolls? Ignore them. Giving them attention is exactly what they want you to do. They probably piss themselves laughing whenever their shit gets re-posted here.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 02:40 PM
5

Well, that's fucking weird.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:24 PM
2

Second letter is an upper-case 'i'.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:35 AM
2

Just off the top of my head - In my area alone within the past few years there have been two such incidents involving men forgetting children in the car while they went into work. No jail time or punishment in either case. It's not that rare of an occurrence for someone to receive little to no punishment for these kinds of tragedies.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 03:49 PM
1

lol.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 12:19 PM
8

I enjoy calling out fake bs on this sub as much as the next guy, but this one's real. It happened on Twitter in 2015. The original Tweet is still there, but the girl calling regret sex 'rape' deactivated her account shortly after, so those tweets are gone. Some of the replies to her tweets are still around, though.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:21 PM
-4

Never ceases to amaze me how people will dig up 4-year-old clickbait articles to get outraged about. This chick didn't sit on anyone. It's outrage-bait made to garner clicks. Unfortunately for xojane.com, their shitty clickbait didn't generate enough clicks to keep them in business.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 06:24 PM
144

Should be noted that the author of this article (Anna Slatz), along with Diana Davison came out with another article today with more information - EXCLUSIVE: Alec Holowka’s private messages reveal Zoe Quinn’s abuse
/r/MensRights12/09/19 02:56 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 07:56 PM
58

106K likes, because people like jokes. I found it pretty funny, so I went and liked it. Thanks for the early morning joke!
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:10 PM
1

I do. There's a bunch of girls on my manly paper towels and if you don't see how oppressive that is, then I don't want to continue this conversation. BLOCKED!
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:08 AM
1

Paper towels, retard. We're here getting buttmad over paper towels, not toilet paper. Get it right!
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:06 AM
3

You have to jump through some serious hoops to see this as anti-male. BRAWNY's generic empowering message for silly Women's History month - "Women are capable of being strong, too!" This sub - "OMG, WHY DO THEY HATE MEN?!" lol.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:02 PM
1

This is so fake it hurts, lol.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 05:38 PM
9

Damn, poor girl. Tamara, I donated $10 to your cause. It's not much, but it's all I can spare at the moment. Good luck with your surgery, sexy! 😍
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:26 PM
5

lol. Their name is "topnotchfeminist". I'm sure they're super serious and totally not a troll or anything.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:49 PM
1

EPIC.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:06 PM
2

If you have a friend who thinks this is actually real, tell him/her to take a long look...etc etc
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:22 PM
1

Sucks that we don't get to see how this confrontation started.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 05:58 PM
2

I remember when this happened. That chick was pretty funny on her Twitter after the angry mob descended upon her. She's not wrong, though. He looks exactly like what you'd expect from someone who has spent that much time on Wikipedia. So yeah, not wrong, just a bit of an asshole for pointing it out. You see similar comments around here when a picture of an overweight Feminist gets posted, so I find the outrage a little funny.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 05:26 PM
3

Don't think you'll be getting a source on this one. The woman in the image is Liliana Vanegas, who was in the news a few years back for drugging and robbing men. She is not a teacher. Unless someone comes up with an actual source, I'm calling shitty photoshop. edit - And it's fake. Found the source for this image on imgur. The same user also made an image of an even more obviously fake article - Experts say rise in sexual relationships between male students and teacher could be linked to video g…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:27 PM
2

No patients were under her care as she was still going through orientation.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:16 AM
3

Here's a more level-headed headline and article - Diabetic, 27, dies after taking cheaper insulin as he lost private health insurance Leave it to the Post to take a man's death and turn it into outrage-bait. Fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 03:21 PM
3

Yeah, two years ago when this all happened.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:57 PM
7

That comment is still quoting the movie - Men are rats, listen to me, they're fleas on rats, worse than that, they're amoebas on fleas on rats. I mean, they're too low for even the dogs to bite. The only man a girl can depend on is her daddy.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 06:25 PM
3

other discussions (109) Goddamn. How many times are you going to post that absurdity?
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:56 AM
1

It's an Instagram skit, so probably not.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:52 AM
1

lol.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:46 PM
1

There were also two other users in there whose comment histories are nothing but intactivism. Now, I'm not saying there was a co-ordinated brigade, but when you have 3 intactivists showing up in a thread on a sub that they never participate in and dropping a combined 30+ posts (some of them fairly aggressive), then it can look like a bit of a brigade to the mods. Genuinely curious how you found that thread.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 11:48 AM
0

Well, it's attaching a real NY Post journalist's name to an obviously fake/photoshopped article. If everyone understood that it was a fake there probably wouldn't be a problem, but there are plenty of tards out there who seem to think it's real. It should be removed.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 05:48 PM
1

Nice meme.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 11:49 AM
3

He's pretty hot for a drag-queen.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:08 AM
6

So she murdered somebody and nothing happens. Basically. No one was murdered.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 05:28 PM
1

And of course Swiet has to go and re-post this everywhere. Nevermind the fact that it's a collage of tweets by trolls. Gotta get that karma, right?
/r/MensRights22/07/19 10:02 PM
1

But... aren’t lesbians women by definition? Sure, but they're not all Feminine. 'Butch' would be the opposite of Femme.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 09:39 PM
3

Femmes = Feminine lesbians in this context. edit - Unless the meaning has changed recently.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 09:12 PM
1

How many of them aren't just trolls? Nice collage, though.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 09:09 PM
1

Not much context here. Were you having a debate or a discussion on this, or did you just randomly send her a wall of unsourced statistics? If a Feminist friend sent me a bunch of gish gallop like this, I'd certainly be a lot less kind than she was.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 07:38 PM
1

😂😂😂 Calling a gal like me a slut is a compliment. New c😍ck every day, and I don't even have to pay! Whooo!
/r/MensRights18/07/19 01:08 PM
1

lol.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:43 PM
1

Yes, the MGTOWers and misogynists here will always decide to spread unverified information as long as it fits their bias. You seem absolutely giddy at this subs' continued devolution into MGTOW. Congratulations, lol.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:44 AM
1

This post is not showing up if you sort by 'new'. And also - https://imgur.com/a/2eKhxxa
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:41 PM
1

Ceddit shows this post as being 'removed by moderators', so there ya go, champ. Try MGTOW. They'll eat this shit up. Vamoose.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:33 PM
1

well, that's just playing devil's advocate. No, it's called having a fucking brain. You're potentially spreading false information against 3 people. edit - If it didn't this post would've been deleted by the mods Ceddit shows this post as being 'removed by moderators', so there ya go, champ. Try MGTOW. They'll eat this shit up.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:29 PM
1

Yes, cheating is shitty, but this has nothing to do with the sub or its goals. How can you for sure say that particular partner that person is dating is cheating or not. How can you be sure that the 3 women in the photo are cheating in the first place? Is that all it takes to convince you - a photo with a caption? lol.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:15 PM
0

Don't waste your time with Lethn. He's beyond being reasoned with. He's always in these threads defending them to the death, despite them having no relevance to mens rights. It's all about generalizing and shitting on women. Posters like him are why this sub gets a shitty rep and why the decent posters ultimately leave out of frustration.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 11:39 AM
10

Thankfully, she's not an educator. She's a culture writer at Buzzfeed Canada.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 02:52 PM
4

Damn, this chick is good. 6 years later and people are still getting offended by her outrage-bait.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:43 PM
4

Jesus Christ, this chick is a hot mess. She's basically the walking stereotype of a white libfem with daddy issues. Dumpy-looking butterface into BDSM. Links to her 'Master's' Twitter page, which is basically naked pics of her and pics of her sucking his BBC. Super empowering! It's just all so predictable and funny/sad. edit - It's all so predictable, I wouldn't be surprised it's all fake, but who knows.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 02:28 PM
1

Yeah, he also said this when people asked him if he was serious - That was a joke. Any man who let's that type of shit happen is a gullible dumb fuck! #SUCKA Man who accused Cardi B of sexual assault admits he was "just joking"
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:36 PM
-1

For a sub that hates false rape accusations, a lot of people here seem to love falsely accusing Cardi B of raping dudes, lol. Also, this case has absolutely nothing to do with her drugging/robbing men.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:17 AM
4

I hear ya. Probably has pointy elbows, too.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:03 PM
3

Totally a camwhore, bro. I just went to her Twitch and checked out her latest video. She was wearing a big hoodie, but I know she's got tits under there somewhere. Fucking THOTS, amirite?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:57 PM
38

Can you read the tweet? Then you're everything she's stated. THAT'S THE FUCKING JOKE.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:49 PM
2

That's the joke, though. She hasn't blocked anyone. I swear, you people purposely misinterpret everything just so you can be a victim.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:48 PM
2

Alright, I'll tell him. Yo, OP! Depressed women can also be soldiers!
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:47 PM
0

Her ideology of telling everyone they're tall, sexy, and have huge wieners? Which ideology is that?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:42 PM
54

No need to brag, OP.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:39 PM
1

Jokes about beating women are never good. You can atone by signing my petition.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:46 PM
1

Danielle Herzog is a freelance writer. Daniella Herzog (the person in the screenshot) isn't a real person. Just someone's troll account .
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:26 PM
-1

Wow, misogyny much?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:19 PM
1

There were no testimonies. There were two dudes who came out with stories about being drugged, robbed, and raped by her, but they both admitted to making the stories up shortly after.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:04 PM
-6

Sooo, you won't be signing my petition?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:33 PM
-1

Jokes are oppression. Gonna make a change.org petition to cancel jokes. Who's with me?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:28 PM
1

There were no suspects. And yet almost everyone just assumes it's the work of Feminists. I guess false flags never happen, eh? Also, this "Become a feminist and abuse the male, whether he is a boy or a man,” can be interpreted a couple of ways. Since a lot of people in this sub love to do the whole "swap the genders!" thing, let's do just that - A slogan pops up on a monument saying "become an MRA and abuse the female, whether she is a girl or a woman". I guarantee you that most people in this s…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:14 PM
1

'She' is a 4chan troll. I have no idea how people keep getting baited by this shit 5 years later.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 01:11 PM
2

www.register-her.net
/r/MensRights19/06/19 12:49 AM
3

Dude, you're doing it all wrong. The whole point of trolling is to not take it too seriously, and here you are getting all defensive - "I HAVE A HOUSE AND A WIFE!", lol. Keep practicing and I'm sure you'll get the hang of it. For what it's worth, you're definitely not the worst troll I've seen.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 03:29 PM
6

Dude, relax. Once Mom leaves the house you can get back to beating your dick to lolicon. You just have to be patient.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 03:08 PM
6

Sorry, champ, but PoGo is pretty fucking weeby. What's wrong, weeb? Did the hole in your waifu pillow get a little too stretched out for your baby dick to feel anything?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:57 PM
2

No problemo!
/r/MensRights15/06/19 08:19 PM
2

This gets posted on Reddit every so often and it always gets pointed out that the alleged attacker pleaded guilty in court. So, I'm gonna be that guy this time around - The attacker (Dacian Martin) pleaded guilty - https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/good-samaritan-mum-headbutted-by-thug-1495221
/r/MensRights15/06/19 08:12 PM
1

Considering he has no say in what happens to the zygote created, why should he bear any responsibility? Feminist Karen DeCrow said it best - "The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liabl…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:46 PM
6

You should use the "4chan troll" flair.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:56 PM
2

Yeah, I read the article, but I've seen too many hoaxes and false flags over the years to immediately assume this was the work of Feminists. Not saying it isn't, but jumping to conclusions and pointing the finger at an entire group is kind of silly at this point.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:02 AM
-17

Did they apprehend the person/people who did it, or is everyone just assuming it was Feminists?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 12:33 PM
9

You actually think this is real? lol.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 07:20 PM
6

Yeah, she also said he farted blood and that she was sleeping with his best friend. i.e. - 'she' was trolling.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 01:12 AM
3

Yes and there is a small bit of that skin that exceeds the lenght of the actual penis which is cut off. Maybe in some cultures, but the typical circumcision done in the Western world involves removal of the entire foreskin that covers the glans, not just the 'overhang'.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 12:37 AM
7

Don't get too upset, it was clearly a troll post.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 08:14 PM
32

White knighting is toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:10 AM
1

That's bait.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:07 PM
1

On set for the filming of the Netflix series 'What/If'. It's makeup.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:59 AM
8

The tweets are by one woman. A young-ish, fairly attractive, blonde-haired white woman. At least that's how they appear in the few photos they have of themselves and their profile picture. It's the Internet, though, so it could just as easily be some tubby basement-dweller from 4chan.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:05 PM
26

It's called trolling.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 09:07 PM
1

Guy, this thread isn't about abortion.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 03:40 PM
1

Can you explain how this is oppression of women? Genuinely curious. I've read the bill, doesn't seem egregious to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 02:33 PM
2

If you give birth you should get maternity leave, regardless of which gender you identify as.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:23 AM
1

No one said "Men can't be raped". They're very clearly saying what happened in the video wasn't rape, which is true, it was sexual assault. Technically, it wasn't sexual assault either. As it's a scripted video by Instagram actors.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:04 PM
1

By confronting a violent aggressor.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 11:15 PM
0

No.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:10 PM
4

sexxystaceface and princezee on Instagram.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:37 PM
3

It's scripted. They're instagram 'comedians' or some shit.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:16 PM
4

She just didn't want to inject herself into the situation out of self preservation. Exactly. They have no obligation to put themselves into potential harm's way, and expecting them to confront a violent person is unrealistic. The only thing I expect people to do is check on the victim and call the Police.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 06:34 PM
-6

baby-dicked incel.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 06:07 PM
-6

Yeah, dude. Those two older ladies in the front would have massacred him! Stop being unrealistic. We have no idea what happened immediately afterwards as the clip ends mere seconds after the push. People are still processing what they just witnessed in those first few seconds.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 06:04 PM
2

LEADING STARTUPS
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:42 PM
2

whereas boys are following pursuits that grow their character. Playing Fortnite and beating their dicks to anime. "It's not what it looks like, Mom! I was growing my character!".
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:45 PM
12

Hah, that's pretty funny. Hopefully she doesn't get any backlash for it. I remember a few instances of dudes making similar jokes and getting pilloried online by overly sensitive Feminists who are incapable of taking a joke.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:54 PM
24

Threatening people with violence, eh? The same people cheering it on would be screaming "toxic masculinity" if Shapiro was the one dishing out the threats.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:01 PM
1

Of course it's bait. The whole purpose of their comments and sub is to trigger men. By going there, getting outraged, and then spreading their words, you're just bringing more attention to them. That's exactly what they want.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:59 PM
3

Stop taking the bait.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:14 PM
8

Does this "actual feminist" happen to also be a dominatrix? This is a femdom meme.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:02 PM
4

This is the second thread I've seen you in where you're doing your whole "don't censor me, bro!" routine. First thread was someone asking people to verify information before posting, and now this thread, where a mod is telling us not to take the bait. I really have to question the motives of someone who's against "don't feed the trolls" and "fact-check before posting".
/r/MensRights07/05/19 01:23 PM
1

Keep fighting the good fight. It's frustrating when I see false information or photoshops getting passed around as fact and getting hundreds of upvotes. It's a bad look for the entire sub. I don't think asking posters to verify their information before submitting is asking too much.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:20 PM
6

No one's eating their own here. It's a troll petition. I mean, it kind of has a point in that it's asking idiots like Larson to put their money where their mouths are (they won't), but the author of the petition is obviously "anti-sjw".
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:13 PM
1

lol, no she didn't. This is what she said - "Yo, if a nigga cheat on me, I'd be "aite". I'ma take him out, we gonna get drunk, I'ma get him all perced up and everything, we gonna have a good time. Get him super twisted, then bring a bitch around. We gonna have a threesome. And when he wake up, he gonna be like "what the fuck?". Yeah, because the bitch was a tranny. I'd be like "yup, we had a threesome with a tranny. Yup." This isn't her admitting to anything. She never said this is something tha…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 07:29 PM
-2

No, she didn't Stop spreading misinformation.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 05:15 PM
-1

She never said she drugged men and had sex with them, only drugged and robbed them. Which video are you watching?
/r/MensRights02/05/19 05:15 PM
1

If the mods are removing misogynistic comments, then that means there are some misogynistic assholes here. I mean, those comments don't just appear out of thin air, do they? Someone has to write them.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 05:18 PM
1

The normal prizes listed here - https://www.qutclassic.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/853702/classic-prizes.pdf, are separated by gender, so I can understand where the confusion may lie. In fact, a lot of racers didn't even realize there was an additional cash prize being awarded to the winners of each race. I'd have to see how those cash prizes were advertised before coming to any conclusion.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:53 PM
1

His link wasn't disproved, though. The quote in the image is fake, as are the others in the article he posted. Just because she's said shitty things in the past and is a genuine racist/sexist piece of shit, doesn't mean we should be okay with spreading misinformation.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 08:22 PM
0

You won't get banned, you'll just get downvoted by the hivemind here who hate having to put their outrage-boners away.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 07:30 PM
1

200+ upvotes for 4chan memes! Nice job, swiet.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:52 PM
2

he*
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:47 PM
41

Doesn't even look like she alerted anyone, either. Just put her head down and high-tailed it outta there. edit - Not saying I'd confront the guy, but I'd certainly yell "dude's got a gun!" before scramming. edit2- After reading an article on it, she apparently yelled "get down!".
/r/MensRights20/04/19 06:52 PM
20

Wikipedia is a joke. Check out r/wikiInaction to get a glimpse into some of the ridiculousness that goes down.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 03:56 PM
1

Sure, partly. I think it's pretty obvious that the type of media people consume influences what their sex lives look like. Of course, maybe it's a chicken and egg thing. Are trends in mainstream porn influenced by people's desires or is porn shaping people's desires.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 01:24 PM
0

I will be very careful, thanks for the warning!
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:46 PM
-8

Anyone else burst out laughing when the piano came in? This chick's pretty funny, kay. edit - Didn't watch the whole thing, but I agree with some of what she's saying. Honestly, she just seems like a nice gal who's tired of dealing with dudes in a porned-out, overly-sexualized world. I can sort of relate. So many women I meet are into polyamory or want a stable of FWBs at their beck and call. Super anti-monogamy. Even the seemingly normal chicks call you "daddy" and want you to choke them, pull …
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:35 PM
0

You got baited by an obvious troll. Congrats?
/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:36 PM
1

When will trolls stop trolling? Probably when people stop giving them attention. Never, would be my guess.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:31 PM
-2

Do you have an archive/source for any of these tweets? I know the 'planned parenthood' one is fake. Would appreciate a source on the other two, thanks!
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:19 PM
1

lfrsolutions, huh? Never heard of it, let's go check it out. "THE STORIES POSTED ON LFRSOLUTIONS.COM ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THE STORIES MAY MIMIC ARTICLES FOUND IN THE HEADLINES, BUT REST ASSURED THEY ARE PURELY SATIRICAL." Oh, ok.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 07:46 PM
2

Source that the author is a Feminist? I'm not entirely sold on the author being an MRA, either. To me, the whole thing just seems like someone capitalizing on outrage. Write something outrageous to rile people up, and enough people will buy the book to see what all the fuss is about. Easy money.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 07:39 PM
4

19th*
/r/MensRights05/03/19 11:59 PM
0

I think a skilled labourer would find sitting on their ass most of the day, taking calls and bringing coffee to their superiors to be pretty challenging. Not in terms of skill or physicality, obviously, but I don't think it's a job they'd be suited for. People who wind up doing jobs that they're not suited for, will find those jobs hard. Like a poster below said - "irritating, maybe. Hard no". I guess it depends on your definition of 'hard', but I'd certainly find doing a job that I find irritat…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:59 PM
0

You're clear.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:36 PM
8

Well, it's a tried and true business model. Write a controversial book. People post about how outraged they are, spreading awareness of the book. And since people love being outraged, a lot of people will inevitably buy it just to see how terrible it really is. Pretty smart on the author's part, whoever he/she is.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 03:12 PM
2

Conveniently forgot to cross out her name in the reply, huh?
/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:09 PM
5

'hard' is entirely subjective and down to the individual. I guarantee you that most of the people in the upper column would find the jobs in the lower column to be hard.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:58 PM
13

Stop getting baited by fucking memes. It's an FB page full of memes/pics of ass and titties. 'She' has another post where she says something similar about women with anxiety.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:54 PM
4

It's not just you. There's certainly a discussion to be had about why men and women choose the jobs they do, but both gaps are ultimately due to choices. edit - Similarly, if a Feminist were to handwave the occupational death-gap away with a "Yeah, but men choose those jobs!", and then go on to whine about the Wage gap, they would also be a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:29 PM
2

Not all circumcisions are the same. Depending on the method or practitioner, there can be varying levels of tissue removed or left over. There's 'high and tight' cuts, 'low and loose'..etc There are also 'partial circumcisions' which will leave enough foreskin left to cover the corona.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 07:12 PM
10

It's satire.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 07:37 PM
3

No, you fucked up the link. It's still up - https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/2018/10/25/court-says-pedophilia-does-not-apply-because-perpetrator-is-a-woman.html
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:47 PM
6

Person posts unverifiable story to Reddit. Media picks up on it and does an article. That article then gets posted to Reddit. It's an interesting cycle.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:33 PM
6

Pretty sure it's a troll account.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:25 AM
140

What a weirdo. Women are not sex toys, they are not dolls. No shit? Sex toys are sex toys, dolls are dolls. They're not women, and anyone claiming they are is off their fucking rocker. *checks out her twitter. And to the surprise of absolutely no one, the first pic on her account is her in lingerie. It's always the chicks who love objectifying themselves who cry about objectification. I think she's just scared of having to compete against dolls.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 11:11 PM
1

You're right, but <insert completely unrelated nonsense> Oh, ok.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:32 PM
1

Depends. If it's a woman making fun of a man, plenty of men seem to get outraged. If it's a man making fun of a woman, plenty of women seem to get outraged. If it's same-sex bullying, no one seems to care. As for this particular incident. Feel free to check out the actual Tweet on Twitter and see how Twitter 'society' reacted.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:21 AM
4

I've seen unattractive people of either gender being made fun of for doing anything.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:30 AM
-11

Yeah, and?
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:27 AM
-14

The fuck are you talking about? He's getting made fun of because he's a man? I guarantee you, that if it was an unattractive overweight woman instead, she'd be getting plenty of comments about her looks, too. Anyway, let's be real here. You're only upset about this because the person being made fun of is a man. If it was a woman, you probably wouldn't give a shit.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:15 PM
2

Anything taken to extremes can be toxic. I don't think masculinity is exempt from that, but neither is femininity.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 06:27 PM
2

Wow, that's a lot of bullshit stuffed into one paper. The author says that Brodsky's study on stealthing involved her visiting sites within the manosphere associated with men's rights. Of course, anyone who looked at Brodsky's study and viewed her sources, knows that's simply not true. Brodsky's sources were experienceproject.com (now defunct), and Iblastinside.com (also defunct). Neither of them have anything to do with the manosphere or men's rights. At the time she did her study, the experien…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 08:20 PM
2

I don't remember exactly, but something along the lines of - "i bet the baby was a boy, that's why she only got probation"
/r/MensRights25/12/18 06:11 PM
18

Cyntoia Brown claims they never had sex. She also admitted to lying about her age when Johnny Allen picked her up. She told him she was in her early 20's. I feel like maybe you're getting a lot your information about this case from celebrity tweets and instagram posts. Probably not the most reliable of sources.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 09:03 PM
42

Your idea of "escaping sex slavery" certainly differs from mine. I mean, the person who allegedly forced her into prostitution was her boyfriend/pimp. He was also the guy she ran back to after killing and robbing her client while he slept. That doesn't exactly sound like escaping to me. Just sounds like plain old murder and robbery.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:39 PM
6

She's eligible for parole, though.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:35 PM
25

From the article in the comment you replied to - In a Snapchat message to her boyfriend, Lopez wrote, “It was a girl by the way.”
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:13 PM
8

Wrestlers are allowed to wear legal hair covers during matches And therein lies the issue. He had a hairpiece, but it was deemed illegal. Because he had dreadlocks, he needed a special hairpiece that connects to his headgear. He didn't have one, so he was given a decision - cut your hair or forfeit. He chose to cut his hair. An official allegedly met with him before the start of the season and told him he'd need a special hairpiece. If that's true, then he either wasn't paying attention, or didn…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 10:53 AM
31

I bet that screenshot is super-duper real!
/r/MensRights22/12/18 06:47 PM
1

It's a fake news site.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:13 PM
1

Nice meme, my dude.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:50 PM
3

Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 03:08 AM
43

I think Karen DeCrow's quote perfectly conveys how I view the situation - The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women mak…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:59 PM
-3

Did the story fool you, too? Don't worry, you're in good company.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 07:05 PM
-2

Well that'd be no fun, now would it? It's hilarious to see retards working themselves into a tizzy over a blatantly fake story. Seriously, that story should have set off some alarms to anyone with decent bullshit-detector. But because it was a story where the woman was made out to be a piece of shit, everyone's bullshit-detectors malfunction and they gobble it up. Guys, I'm saying all this because I care, honestly. This sub used to be awesome, but it's slowly gone to shit. Before instantly belie…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:48 PM
12

Yeah, I've read the story. Thanks, though. Here's another (deleted) story from that same user, btw - https://www.removeddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/a4ybga/30m_called_my_wife_26f_a_cow_in_the_making_and/ In one story he's a divorce lawyer, in the other he's a surgeon. In one story his wife is a "landwhale" and "a cow in the making", and in the comment section of the other story he describes her as "really fit". I just don't know what to believe? I mean, the dude posted it on Reddit, so…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:24 PM
18

Wow. Could you imagine actually believing that story was real?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 11:07 AM
0

also - your use of the 'at its finest' meme indicates a lack of original thought. 'at it's finest' is flavor text - it has no meaning. what would be the intended difference in semantic content between these 2 phrases: "This is idiocy." "This is idiocy at it's finest" what would represent a less fine example of idiocy? Am I expected to believe that you have never seen a more glaring or obvious or tragic or otherwise 'fine' example? Autism at its finest.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:24 PM
4

Because it can lead to harassment and threats. And if that harassment gets linked back to this thread, then we're deemed responsible. Depending on the level of harassment, there's always the possibility the media picks up on it. Which leads to a wave of - "Men on Reddit co-ordinate harassment of stunning and brave woman" articles. Not a good look for Reddit. At that point, the Reddit admins have a perfectly valid reason to take a long hard look at this sub and determine whether or not it's worth…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 04:38 PM
3

Everyone who disagrees with me is a Feminazi! Take a deep breath and simmer down, champ.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 05:49 PM
0

Why the fuck would I send him to jail? Probably just have him attend a few Ass-Eaters Anonymous meetings. That oughta set him straight.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:48 AM
-1

The kid obviously needs help, too. I mean, if he's 15 and already pestering his Mom into doing some kinky shit, imagine how much of a sex pest he'll be when he grows up?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:08 AM
4

Haha, you are being ridiculous. The article you linked to didn't have those facts. Instead of going "my bad, I should have linked to a better article", you're here pms'ing on anyone who doesn't have all the facts due to your incompetence.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:04 AM
-5

"It's stated clearly in other reports that I didn't think to link to". Good job. Still not rape, though.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 12:32 AM
3

This post should have been down voted into Oblivion. It should be. Unfortunately, few people actually read past OP's title or even click on the article. People see a headline that confirms their bias and they automatically click the upvote button. That's not a knock on this sub in particular, as you'll see the same behaviour everywhere. It's one of the most frustrating things about the Internet.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 07:34 PM
6

That's cute. I remember when I had my first beer.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:54 PM
7

Female predator Paid actor thinks teenage boys would be "lucky" to be victimized by her
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:09 PM
10

Considering she's clearly not white, I don't think that'd fly in court.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:00 PM
1

She says controversial shit to get attention. Stop giving it to her.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 01:00 PM
2

Teacher only goes in after he hits her The dude was able to get 20+ swings in before the teacher showed up, lol. I think it's most likely that the teacher wasn't there when the fight started.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 10:59 PM
2

A new account posting retarded shit. Very subtle.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 04:02 PM
2

I wouldn't really call it a double-standard, but people are generally more shocked when they hear about a Mother leaving their child. Not sure why you felt the need to make a thread about this, though. She realized her child would be better off with the Dad, paid child support, helped out...etc Seems like a genuinely good person. Certainly doesn't seem deserving of the vitriol you're spewing at her over there.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 10:50 PM
82

Aside from the fact that they both frequent Southhampton Uni., this has absolutely no relation to the tard who wanted to paint over murals. Adding that bit to the title is a bit disingenuous. Not sure what your motive was, but it will (and seemingly already has) mislead people into thinking they're somehow connected.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:32 PM
3

Let's try using our brains for a few seconds and not get pissed off at obvious satire.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:46 PM
24

They reported on the story earlier. The headline was - "Mom accused of shooting her kids in the head while they slept.". The article went on to say that her son died while the daughter was injured. The purpose of this newer article is to update everyone on the daughter. I mean, I guess they could include the son in the headline. Maybe something like - "Teen girl allegedly shot by her Mom while sleeping has died. Son still dead."
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:21 AM
1

Dude, delete this shit, it's embarrassing. You get in a little e-argument and you come running here for backup?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:22 PM
1

I actually bothered checking the user histories of a few of the people insisting she was raped. Surprising no one at all, they were from the MGTOW sub.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 08:57 PM
0

I just don't feel like documentaries should depict this as "part of the culture". But it is part of their culture. If they were to document it as anything but part of the culture, they wouldn't be documenting the truth. Cultures can have gruesome traditions that should stop being performed. This is one of them. I agree. But that doesn't mean we should stop objectively documenting these things when they do happen.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 01:51 PM
-2

I want to stop the mutilation of children, too. I just prefer when documentaries and reporting are done without bias. Just give me the facts so I can form my own opinion. You prefer documentaries that tell you what to think. That's perfectly fine. Just a different preference is all.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 12:30 PM
-6

it's a documentary with a bias Not really. They're reporting on the tradition and how the locals view it. Reporting or documenting practices/customs/events...etc is not neccessarily endorsement. You, on the other hand, want them to condemn the practice. That would be a documentary with a bias.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 12:25 PM
8

lol. It's a pretty funny joke.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 07:16 PM
0

Damn, you right. Backpage totally wasn't filled with fake ads, scams, or escorts false-advertising with pictures of models/pornstars. Let's try thinking about this a little bit. Do you really think she'd take a trip down to Denver, Co and start advertising with her Instagram photos and not even attempt to hide her identity by cropping out her face or blurring her tattoos? Hey, maybe she did, but don't you think this would be in the media? TMZ would be all over this shit, but a quick Google searc…
/r/MGTOW05/10/18 08:00 PM
-1

Whoa, an escort on backpage used someone else's pics. Riveting stuff.
/r/MGTOW05/10/18 06:48 PM
1

Kate Morgan has said plenty of stupid shit on Twitter, but that tweet of her advocating abortion of white baby boys is fake.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:08 PM
3

That's a pic of Matthew Mcconaughey, btw. Cool story, though.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 07:56 PM
0

Because he was the one who allegedly shoved his penis inside her without her consent.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:21 PM
1

Thanks for the info!
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:08 PM
4

Where did you get this photo, OP? Did you add the writing or did someone else? Did you verify the info or just blindly believe it? Are you ready to question the propaganda? I'm ready to question anything that doesn't have a source. If you can't verify this photo, for all we know this is propaganda.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:39 PM
0

And his looks are relevant to the story because? They're not. Maybe the responses should be slammed for that. You're free to visit TMZ's FB page and do so.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:59 PM
-6

"Obvious physical injuries", lol. One could argue that wearing guyliner is an obvious mental illness, but it's certainly not a physical injury.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 03:06 PM
8

That's a different husband, by the way. Also, while they did neglect to mention that she's been accused of domestic violence in the past (towards a different hubby), they also failed to mention that Glendon Crain (current husband) was also accused of domestic violence towards Stormy Daniels in 2015. They're not playing favourites here. They're just listing information that is relevant to the restraining order.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:19 PM
8

Wow, nice googling! The thing is, your title says he filed a restraining order "due to violence". I've read multiple articles on the restraining order, and none of them have mentioned violence as the reason. If you can find an article that says otherwise, please post.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:52 PM
20

You should try actually reading the article. She's not being accused of violence.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 03:14 AM
-8

Pretty much. Blue text is basically exemplifying behaviour this sub used to mock Feminists for. It's essentially "I assumed your intent, and even though my assumption was wrong, you still need to apologize for hurting my feelings".
/r/MensRights13/07/18 02:02 PM
2

Is that the "Bring out the gimp" scene? I remember it being pretty funny, but it's been awhile.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:09 PM
3

Where is he calling himself an MRA? I've checked out his Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube page and didn't see anything mentioning him being an MRA. Granted, I didn't dig very deeply, so I could've missed it.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:01 AM
3

Well, we don't really know all the context here. But if he just messages people out of the blue with "Hey, want to see my cock?", that's a little creepy. Being nice about the whole thing doesn't make it not creepy.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 08:19 PM
12

Thankfully. Imagine living in a system that didn't allow jokes? It'd be a Feminist Utopia.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 04:55 PM
12

Don't be ridiculous. One person suggested filing kidnapping charges. A comment that no one seems to agree with.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:50 PM
8

Well, she's obviously an idiot, but I can't say I agree with what the other person is saying either. Stop looking at men's bulges without permission I did not consent to your eyes looking at my crotch! Eye-rape! C'mon, man.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:31 PM
2

Nah, not gonna lose my shit over a joke posted to a banter page on FB.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:51 PM
2

Alright. Don't see how that changes much. Still doesn't necessarily make her anti-male. I wouldn't want to give my Skype details out to someone who frequents Feminist boards. Sure, they may not actually be a Feminist, but if they're on a Feminist board, then there's a chance they'd want to have discussions on the topic of Feminism, which I'd rather not have on my personal messaging apps. I leave that kind of thing to Reddit. That doesn't make me anti-women. It just means I only give out my detai…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 08:51 PM
2

How old are you, man? You are going to have a tough time out there if this is how you react any time someone says "no thanks".
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:14 PM
4

She messaged you on Reddit, which is fairly impersonal. You then wanted to escalate to a more personal form of messaging. She checked you out and decided "no, not a good match". That's it. I get that being told "no" can be a little upsetting. But you're blowing this way out of proportion. You've posted this to two subs, all because someone wouldn't give you their kik details. Think about that for a second, dude. She probably saw that and went "holy shit, I dodged a bullet there".
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:08 PM
4

Not wanting to chat with an MRA doesn't make someone anti-male any more than not wanting to chat with a Feminist makes someone anti-woman. Also, look at it from her perspective. I'm assuming she's a domme. A lot of male subs can be especially whiny and needy. She probably gets plenty of messages everyday from those guys wanting to "chat" with her. I can imagine how exhausting that might be. Because of that, she's probably very selective about who she chooses to interact with. She'd probably rath…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:26 PM
37

Damn. Kid has a Hart of gold.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 05:50 PM
5

Oh, boy. The daily thread where we fly off the handle over an obvious joke/meme.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:08 PM
2

I'll PM you the link to the comment.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 04:47 AM
16

Yep. I've already seen a comment in r/canada referencing Elliot Rodger as "that MRA guy".
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:14 AM
1

You said "these horrible things", which implies you were referencing multiple assertions, not just the one. Also, he's most likely correct in assuming Connolly would have gone away once the girl got her puck. It happens all the time. A player singles a fan out, gives them a puck and goes away. That doesn't make him a bad person. Players don't have time to give everyone a puck.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:04 PM
1

I'm disgusted that you would read that and think he was actually calling Connolly a pedophile.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 11:17 PM
1

/u/abelincolnstophat87's new account? Squawker is fucking trash.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:57 PM
4

Good video calling out a lot of the bullshit misinformation floating around. Misinformation that plays on the insecurities of boys and men.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 03:06 PM
17

Ugh. What kind of a terrible man forces his woman to walk that close to the street? Doesn't he know that's where he's supposed to walk. He's the first line of defense against cars or rocks/dust/puddle water that gets thrown up by cars passing by. Not to mention he probably forced her to wear those high-heels. I bet he's hoping she breaks a heel and stumbles into oncoming traffic. So much misogyny in one picture, I can't even.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:41 PM
2

I would strongly encourage you to watch the Swedish documentary series I link to above. Sorry to nitpick, but it's Norwegian :P
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:34 AM
2

If there's one thing I've learned on Reddit, it's that people rarely read past the headline.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 02:13 PM
5

Source that Leonor Flores was the project lead for this project?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:30 PM
11

I think the source for the unnamed female engineer is this - Community gathers to watch 950-ton bridge move across Southwest 8th Street Basically, a project manager at MCM named Leonor Flores said "It’s very important for me as a woman and an engineer to be able to promote that to my daughter, because I think women have a different perspective. We’re able to put in an artistic touch and we’re able to build, too.” What a monster, I know. Anyway, there were a couple passages within the article tha…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:01 PM
3

I'm not really interested in pointing fingers at anyone, regardless of where the blame lies. I'm just curious as to why everyone is assuming the engineer was a woman, when I've read articles that completely contradict that.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:12 PM
6

It was her fault for making gender a issue. So people want to knock her down. It is only women who do this. Which woman are we talking about here? Everyone's talking as though it's a known fact that "the engineer" was a woman, but I've yet to see definitive proof of this.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 11:31 AM
7

Eh? If anyone was making light of the situation, it was the boyfriend. The reporting seems fairly neutral to me.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:23 PM
0

Ah, yes. Time for the daily "let's get all riled up over an obvious joke" thread.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 01:19 PM
2

She had received a text from him the night before saying "Gone to Florida". She took that to mean he was leaving the state, which would break the agreement they had. So the plan was to lure him to the office, take him into custody and revoke the bond. No bond, back to jail he goes. edit - He might not necessarily be going straight back to jail, but he was definitely going back into custody, which he obviously didn't want to happen.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:12 AM
2

lol, you're delusional. How much money does she get if he's dead? A setup for murder? Cool setup. Kill the guy, never get your money back and then lose even more when the victim's family takes her to civil court. I don't think she's gonna win that trial.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:02 AM
-5

Jesus, dude. You're going balls deep. Look, she's clearly a lying piece of shit who belongs behind bars, but I can't agree that she set the whole thing up just she could escalate things and shoot him. More likely explanation - She meant to detain him, shit went south and the situation got out of hand, she didn't know how to handle it, panicked and overreacted. Then went to court and lied through her teeth hoping for the best. Luckily for her, the Prosecutors are either corrupt as fuck and wanted…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:37 AM
-4

What video are you watching? She closes the door, he says something along the lines of "oh shit", because it's probably starting to dawn on him that he's in some sort of trouble, but at this point he's still calm and cooperative. He doesn't jump up, lol. He stands up when she tells him to stand up. He doesn't become visibly perturbed until she tells him to turn around so she can cuff him. These are all minor details, anyway. Basically, he was getting upset because he realized he was going back t…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:46 AM
5

No, he was set off before that. Well, I 'slogged' through the entire 3 minute video and it didn't seem like that to me. They were chatting cordially about cars up until she stood up, closed the door, then told him to stand up against the wall and turn around.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:22 AM
-11

I'm assuming you didn't have sound? What sets him off is her asking him to turn around so she can put cuffs on him while they wait for the PD to get there. He clearly doesn't want to be detained. He asks her to open the door, she obviously doesn't comply, so he goes out the window. She then retrieves the gun from her drawer and shoots him. Honestly, I don't think she meant to shoot him. She seems pretty surprised that the gun went off. Probably just meant to point the gun at him to scare him int…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:03 AM
1

There were 3 explosions. One on the 2nd that killed a man. One early Monday that killed the boy and injured a woman, and then a later one that injured an elderly woman. That title is referencing the third explosion that injured the old woman. They've already reported on the earlier blast and the title is simply conveying the newest information - that another blast injured a woman. If the title was about the 2nd explosion and the title only mentioned the injured the woman, then I'd understand you…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:32 PM
-1

Yay, another fake/joke post. Is it so hard to spend a few minutes Googling shit to verify whether or not it's real before posting?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:55 PM
0

I'll paypal $10 to anyone who finds the corresponding article to this. Good luck, retards.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:40 PM
1

Ah, good ol' Amanda "rape-loving scum" Marcotte.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:03 PM
10

Her upbringing and her alleged ordeal with her pimp are unfortunate, but that doesn't excuse shooting a man in the head and then robbing him. Her story is bullshit. She alleges the victim was reaching for something that she assumed was a gun and shot him in self-defense, but forensic evidence shows the man died face-down with his hands clasped under his head. In short, she's where she belongs.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 03:09 PM
24

Nothing new. trollx routinely crosses into 'hate all men' territory.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:38 PM
1

99% sure absinthe was being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:30 PM
7

I wouldn't be so sure. My brother's been in multiple bands, that shit is par for the course. As for the texts, those are pretty standard between many friend groups. I can't even begin to count how many times I've had a friend send me links to shit like tubgirl, goatse, lemonparty...etc
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:09 PM
20

He made the mistake of treating her like a regular bandmate, and not a "female bandmate". Bet he won't make that mistake again.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:41 PM
0

Don't think he's full-on jacking it. Just giving it some squeezes to get and keep some blood in there for a semi, hoping she'd glance over and see what he's packing.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:17 PM
1

I hope you're not taking this article seriously.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:29 PM
18

The repercussions of that 30-second conversation came swiftly: I received a call from a Huffington Post reporter while still on the field. This seems incredibly fucked up to me. The woman sought him out, didn't get the answer she wanted and decided "welp, better put him on blast. Time to speed-dial my contact at HuffPo". The speed at which it all happened makes it seem as though it was planned out.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:15 PM
2

k.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:43 PM
2

but eventually the question and all of the replies (except my two comments, oddly enough) ended up removed Your comments were removed. You see them and they're in your post history, but if you were to logout and view the thread, you'd see what everyone else sees, a bunch of [deleted]'s where your comments should be.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 05:51 PM
2

Yeah, this is Lena Kochman. She's either a master troll or has legitimate mental issues. She has plenty of Youtube videos of her accusing Postal workers, UPS drivers, Water and Sewage workers....etc of stalking her.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:41 PM
36

His name has been in the paper before. WASHINGTON MAN ARRESTED FOR INDECENT EXPOSURE, and unless he gets some serious help, he'll probably be in the paper again.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 04:50 PM
16

It's called a joke.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:22 PM
2

Exposing someone to the risk of STD's or possible pregnancy when they explicitly said "no" to those risks is definitely some form of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:46 PM
74

That's just parading_goats being parading_goats. Almost all of her comments border on the absurd. Still not sure whether she's just trolling or not. Either way, point and laugh, then move on.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:55 PM
13

I always enjoy how they mention "dude fragility" while they work themselves into a frenzy over the silliest of things.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:37 PM
4

Anyone who thinks this is real is at least semi-tarded.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:26 PM
1

You're missing the other source for Brodsky's 'study'. This group on a site that hasn't been active for almost 4 years. http://www.experienceproject.com/groups/Remove-The-Condom-Without-Them-Knowing-During-Stealth-Sex/527307 The quote where a woman talks affirmatively about being inseminated and "spreading his seed is a man's right" is a response to the "A Comprehensive Guide" story. There are about 25 stories and I have a hard time believing any of them are real. They all read like laughably ba…
/r/MensRights28/04/17 03:46 AM
1

Sure, but the test won't show intent. Did she honestly forget to take the pill that day or a few days in a row, or did she wink wink nudge nudge "forget" to take the pill. I wouldn't want women being prosecuted for honest mistakes. In the same vein, I wouldn't want men being prosecuted for incidents where the condom accidentally slips off and he keeps going without realizing.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:03 PM
5

Pretty indifferent to the whole Red Pill thing.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 11:19 PM
1

It's cited in the Wikipedia page you mentioned. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2954726
/r/MensRights25/04/17 03:56 PM
1

How do you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Probably the same way you prove a woman lied about being on the pill. 99.9% of the time, you can't. No one's arguing that you should be able to make an accusation of stealthing and the dude should be convicted on the spot. We're just arguing the point that stealthing is in fact sexual assault. The likelihood of actually being found guilty is extremely low.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 03:50 PM
1

Was Seth Rogan assaulting Katherine Heigl in the movie Knocked Up? Of course not, because he didn't purposely remove the condom. It fell off accidentally. I don't think you're grasping the whole concept of stealthing. It is the willful act of removing the condom without the knowledge or consent of the partner. That is a crime, and in places where it isn't deemed one, it should be.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 03:19 PM
1

Being on the pill does not protect her from possible exposure to disease. I agree with you that there should be legal repercussions to women who lie about their contraception use, but the fact that there isn't does not and should not make stealthing any less of a crime.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 03:11 PM
2

These are the "communities" cited in the study - http://www.experienceproject.com/groups/Remove-The-Condom-Without-Them-Knowing-During-Stealth-Sex/527307 and http://www.iBLASTinside.com NSFW, obviously. The first link is an inactive group on an inactive site. The 25 or so stories and the few responses to them all read like bad fiction. The last story was posted around 4 years ago. The second link is a gay blog/site. Again, not very active. The article makes it seem like there are large communiti…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 05:24 PM
2

"Greetings comrades". Hahaha. C'mon, man. There is absolutely no way any of these videos are real. Entertaining, though.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:17 PM
1

DAE FEMINISTS ARE UGLY? How does this trash get upvotes?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:12 PM
8

Switzerland*
/r/MensRights13/01/17 08:50 PM
25

2XC is seen as kind of a 'support group' for some women, so it's generally frowned upon to question whether or not the stories are true. Combine that with the fact that a lot of the posters there seem to have a very "listen and believe" approach to most things, it's not surprising that it's a prime target for fake stories. I've been visiting 2XC for the past 6 years or so, and most days there's usually at least one blatantly false story that people lap up.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 10:39 PM
1

"Definition of muffin top in English: muffin top NOUN informal A roll of fat visible above the top of a pair of women's tight-fitting low-waisted trousers."
/r/MensRights16/09/16 05:34 PM
2

Don't think so for the paddleboard shot, but he's definitely 3/4th's torqued in one of the beach pics.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:48 AM
0

Probably the same amount of damage Trump can do to women if he was elected - none.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:16 PM
14

I get a very "The Young Turks-y" vibe from your post. Don't worry, you'll probably grow out of it.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:25 AM
1

OVER 9000.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:47 PM
1

It gets worse - here's Snopes (you know, that site that supposedly ferrets out the truth!) calling Roosh a Men's Rights Activist, as well. A controversial "men's rights activist" has organized a meetup spanning 43 countries, but the event isn't specifically billed as pro-rape, as some are claiming.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 01:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter